1
|
Grün A, Cumaoglu S, Kluge A, Schlomm T, Böhmer D, Miller K, Heidenreich H, Zips D, Kalinauskaite G. Early and repetitive novel-tracer PET-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer after definitive first-line therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02304-9. [PMID: 39331064 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02304-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging can detect prostate cancer (PCa) nodal oligorecurrences (NOR) at very low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Prospective studies on oligorecurrent (OR) PCa have been hampered by either dated diagnostics or inhomogeneous cohorts and/or treatment approaches. We hypothesized that early and-if necessary and feasible-repetitive PSMA-PET-based metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) would improve freedom from palliative (systemic) therapy at low toxicity. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of patients treated for OR PCa after definitive first-line therapy using PSMA-PET/CT-based SBRT. Endpoints were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), SBRT-free survival (SBRT-FS), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 67 patients and 248 metastases (211 nodal) were treated. Patients on concurrent ADT were excluded. Median PSA at inclusion was 2.175 ng/ml. bPFS, SBRT-FS, and ADT-FS for multiple-course SBRT were 9.5, 19.5, and 35.0 months, respectively; 32 patients had ≥ 1 course of SBRT. Median PSA nadir was 0.585 ng/ml. There was no ≥ grade 2 toxicity. CONCLUSION Modern-tracer PET/CT-based early and repetitive focal SBRT yields promising results with regard to bPFS, SBRT-FS, and ADT-FS with low toxicity. The ability of this approach to postpone initiation of palliative treatment with low toxicity should be re-evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Grün
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Selin Cumaoglu
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- MVZ Leipzig Strahlentherapie, Landsberger Straße 81, 04157, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department for Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Department for Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Heidenreich
- Department for Urology, Bundeswehr Krankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststraße 13, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sheikh GT, Trapp C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Buchner A, Stief CG, Unterrainer M, Kunz WG, Cyran CC, Grawe F, Delker A, Zacherl MJ, Holzgreve A, Unterrainer LM, Brendel M, Belka C, Li M, Rogowski P. PSMA-PET/CT response after metastasis-directed radiotherapy of bone oligometastases in prostate cancer. EJNMMI REPORTS 2024; 8:25. [PMID: 39155339 PMCID: PMC11330950 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00212-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bone metastases are very common in advanced prostate cancer and can sensitively be detected utilizing PSMA-PET/CT. Therefore, our goal was to evaluate the suitability of PSMA-PET/CT-guided metastasis-directed external beam radiotherapy (MDT) as treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence and oligometastatic bone lesions. MATERIALS & METHODS We retrospectively examined 32 prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence and PSMA-positive oligometastatic disease limited to the bone (n = 1-3). A total of 49 bone lesions were treated with MDT. All patients received a post-radiotherapy PSMA-PET/CT-Scan. Changes in SUVmax, PSMA-positive tumor volume per lesion and PSA, as well as the correlation between the PET/CT-interval and SUVmax response were calculated. RESULTS MDT lead to a SUVmax decrease in 46/49 (94%) of the lesions. The median relative decline of SUVmax was 60.4%, respectively. Based on PSMA-positive lesion volume with a SUV cut-off of 4, 46/49 (94%) of lesions showed complete response, two (4%) partial response and one lesion (2%) was stable on PSMA-PET/CT after MDT. Most of the treated patients (56.3%) showed an initial PSA decline at three months and a PSA nadir of median 0.14 ng/ml after a median time of 3.6 months after MDT. The median relative PSA change at three months after MDT was 3.9%. CONCLUSION MDT is a very effective treatment modality for prostate cancer bone oligometastases and lesion response to MDT can be assessed using the (semi-)quantitative parameters SUVmax and PSMA-positive lesion volume with established SUV cut-offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel T Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Matsukawa A, Nyirády P, Shariat SF, Rajwa P. Defining oligometastatic state in uro-oncological cancers. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:261-265. [PMID: 38704827 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic tumors illustrate a distinct state between localized and systematic disease and might harbor unique biologic features. Moreover, these tumors represent a different clinical entity, with a potential of long-term disease control or even cure, therefore they receive growing attention in the field of urologic oncology. RECENT FINDINGS Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer, most experts limit it to a maximum of three to five lesions and involvement of no more than two organs, excluding visceral metastases. Quality data on oligometastatic bladder cancer is scarce, however, a consensus of experts defined it as a maximum of three metastatic lesions, either resectable or suitable for stereotactic therapy, without restrictions to the number of organs involved. As for kidney cancer, a maximum number of five metastases, without limitations to the location are defined as oligometastatic, with an important implication of timing of developing metastases since diagnosis of the primary tumor. SUMMARY Defining oligometastatic state among urological tumors reflecting their distinct biological and clinical behavior is crucial to establish a sound framework for future clinical trials, and to facilitate guideline and policy formulation for improved patient care. Advancements in molecular imaging are expected to transform the field of oligometastatic urologic tumors in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Janssen S, El Shafie RA, Grohmann M, Knippen S, Putora PM, Beck M, Baehr A, Clemens P, Stefanowicz S, Rades D, Becker JN, Fahlbusch FB. Survey in radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: state of digitalization by 2023. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:497-506. [PMID: 38052968 PMCID: PMC11111513 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02182-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to assess the current state of digitalization in radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. METHODS A comprehensive survey was conducted in a digital format, consisting of 53 questions that covered various aspects of digitalization including patient workflow, departmental organization, radiotherapy planning, and employee-related aspects. RESULTS Overall, 120 forms were eligible for evaluation. Participants were mainly physicians or medical physicists responsible for digitalization aspects in their departments. Nearly 70% of the institutions used electronic patient records, with 50% being completely paperless. However, the use of smartphone apps for electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROMs) and digital health applications (DIGA) was limited (9% and 4.9%, respectively). In total, 70.8% of the radio-oncology departments had interfaces with diagnostic departments, and 36% had digital interchanges with other clinics. Communication with external partners was realized mainly through fax (72%), e‑mails (55%), postal letters (63%), or other digital exchange formats (28%). Almost half of the institutions (49%) had dedicated IT staff for their operations. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first of its kind conducted in German-speaking radiation oncology departments within the medical field. The findings suggest that there is a varied level of digitalization implementation within these departments, with certain areas exhibiting lower rates of digitalization that could benefit from targeted improvement initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- Private Practice of Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Grohmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Hospitals Schwerin, 19053 Schwerin, Germany
- Department for Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paul M Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Baehr
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Clemens
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Sarah Stefanowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Fabian B Fahlbusch
- Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miszczyk M, Soeterik T, Marra G, Matsukawa A, Shariat SF. Metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:178-182. [PMID: 38426229 PMCID: PMC10990025 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the recent findings on the subject of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa). RECENT FINDINGS Evidence from two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and a meta-analysis show favorable toxicity profiles, and the potential to delay androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for up to two years in nearly half of patients with metachronous hormone-sensitive omPCa. Another RCT showed promising results of MDT as treatment-escalation method combined with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) in first-line treatment for castration-resistant omPCa.Surveys by radiation oncologists and consensus guidelines advocate for MDT across various omPCa scenarios. Multiple single-arm trials present encouraging results; however, the evidence for the benefit of MDT is still weak requiring further investigation to assess its impact on pivotal endpoints, such as survival and quality of life. SUMMARY MDT is a promising approach in omPCa, and can be used to defer ADT in newly diagnosed metachronous omPCa patients, or to add to ARSI treatment at first diagnosis of castration-resistance. Ongoing prospective trials are needed to guide its optimal utilization in other settings, and patients should be informed about the evolving landscape of systemic therapies with proven survival benefits alongside MDT options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Collegium Medicum – Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Timo Soeterik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Research Centre for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang C, Sherry AD, Haymaker C, Bathala T, Liu S, Fellman B, Cohen L, Aparicio A, Zurita AJ, Reuben A, Marmonti E, Chun SG, Reddy JP, Ghia A, McGuire S, Efstathiou E, Wang J, Wang J, Pilie P, Kovitz C, Du W, Simiele SJ, Kumar R, Borghero Y, Shi Z, Chapin B, Gomez D, Wistuba I, Corn PG. Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Intermittent Hormone Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The EXTEND Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:825-834. [PMID: 37022702 PMCID: PMC10080407 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit with up-front hormone therapy in addition to established synergy between hormone therapy and radiation, the addition of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to hormone therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer, to date, has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To determine in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer whether the addition of MDT to intermittent hormone therapy improves oncologic outcomes and preserves time with eugonadal testosterone compared with intermittent hormone therapy alone. Design, Setting, Participants The External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease (EXTEND) trial is a phase 2, basket randomized clinical trial for multiple solid tumors testing the addition of MDT to standard-of-care systemic therapy. Men aged 18 years or older with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had 5 or fewer metastases and were treated with hormone therapy for 2 or more months were enrolled to the prostate intermittent hormone therapy basket at multicenter tertiary cancer centers from September 2018 to November 2020. The cutoff date for the primary analysis was January 7, 2022. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT, consisting of definitive radiation therapy to all sites of disease and intermittent hormone therapy (combined therapy arm; n = 43) or to hormone therapy only (n = 44). A planned break in hormone therapy occurred 6 months after enrollment, after which hormone therapy was withheld until progression. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was disease progression, defined as death or radiographic, clinical, or biochemical progression. A key predefined secondary end point was eugonadal progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from achieving a eugonadal testosterone level (≥150 ng/dL; to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 0.0347) until progression. Exploratory measures included quality of life and systemic immune evaluation using flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing. Results The study included 87 men (median age, 67 years [IQR, 63-72 years]). Median follow-up was 22.0 months (range, 11.6-39.2 months). Progression-free survival was improved in the combined therapy arm (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only arm (median, 15.8 months; 95% CI, 13.6-21.2 months) (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P < .001). Eugonadal PFS was also improved with MDT (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only (6.1 months; 95% CI, 3.7 months to not estimable) (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; P = .03). Flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing demonstrated increased markers of T-cell activation, proliferation, and clonal expansion limited to the combined therapy arm. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, PFS and eugonadal PFS were significantly improved with combination treatment compared with hormone treatment only in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Combination of MDT with intermittent hormone therapy may allow for excellent disease control while facilitating prolonged eugonadal testosterone intervals. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03599765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander D. Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Tharakeswara Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Suyu Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bryan Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amado J. Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Enrica Marmonti
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sean McGuire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Eleni Efstathiou
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jianbo Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Patrick Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Craig Kovitz
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Weiliang Du
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Samantha J. Simiele
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Yerko Borghero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Zheng Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
| | - Brian Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ignacio Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Paul G. Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|