Evaluation of the ability of the Brainlab Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm to correct clinically relevant MRI distortions for cranial SRT

Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors.

Research question

Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments?

Material and methods

Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes.

Results

The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01-12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1-2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1-100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1-99.5%).

Discussion and conclusion

MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.

Impact of magnetic resonance imaging-related geometric distortion of dose distribution in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The geometric distortion related to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in a diagnostic radiology (MRDR) and radiotherapy (MRRT) setup is evaluated, and the dosimetric impact of MR distortion on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients with brain metastases is simulated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic skull phantom was scanned using a 1.5‑T MR scanner, and the magnitude of MR distortion was calculated with (MRDR-DC and MRRT-DC) and without (MRDR-nDC and MRRT-nDC) distortion-correction algorithms. Automated noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (HyperArc, HA; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) plans were generated for 53 patients with 186 brain metastases. The MR distortion at each gross tumor volume (GTV) was calculated using the distance between the center of the GTV and the MR image isocenter (MIC) and the quadratic regression curve derived from the phantom study (MRRT-DC and MRRT-nDC). Subsequently, the radiation isocenter of the HA plans was shifted according to the MR distortion at each GTV (HADC and HAnDC).

RESULTS

The median MR distortions were approximately 0.1 mm when the distance from the MIC was < 30 mm, whereas the median distortion varied widely when the distance was > 60 mm (0.23, 0.47, 0.37, and 0.57 mm in MRDR-DC, MRDR-nDC, MRRT-DC, and MRRT-nDC, respectively). The dose to the 98% of the GTV volume (D98%) decreased as the distance from the MIC increased. In the HADC plans, the relative dose difference of D98% was less than 5% when the GTV was located within 70 mm from the MIC, whereas the underdose of GTV exceeded 5% when it was 48 mm (-26.5% at maximum) away from the MIC in the HAnDC plans.

CONCLUSION

Use of a distortion-correction algorithm in the studied MR diagnoses is essential, and the dosimetric impact of MR distortion is not negligible, particularly for tumors located far away from the MIC.

Quality requirements for MRI simulation in cranial stereotactic radiotherapy: a guideline from the German Taskforce "Imaging in Stereotactic Radiotherapy"

Accurate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) simulation is fundamental for high-precision stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, collectively referred to as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), to deliver doses of high biological effectiveness to well-defined cranial targets. Multiple MRI hardware related factors as well as scanner configuration and sequence protocol parameters can affect the imaging accuracy and need to be optimized for the special purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning. MRI simulation for SRT is possible for different organizational environments including patient referral for imaging as well as dedicated MRI simulation in the radiotherapy department but require radiotherapy-optimized MRI protocols and defined quality standards to ensure geometrically accurate images that form an impeccable foundation for treatment planning. For this guideline, an interdisciplinary panel including experts from the working group for radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO), the working group for physics and technology in stereotactic radiotherapy of the German Society for Medical Physics (DGMP), the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC), the German Society of Neuroradiology (DGNR) and the German Chapter of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (DS-ISMRM) have defined minimum MRI quality requirements as well as advanced MRI simulation options for cranial SRT.

Relationship between imaging parameters and distortion in magnetic resonance images for gamma knife treatment planning

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is necessary to reduce image distortion as much as possible because it suppresses the increase in the planning target volume. This study investigated the relationship between imaging parameters and image distortion when using G-frames. The images were obtained using a 1.5-T MRI system with a 09-101 Pro-MRI phantom. Image distortion was measured by changing the RF pulse mode, gradient mode, asymmetric echo, and bandwidth (BW). The image distortion was increased in the high RF mode than in the Normal mode. The image distortion increased in the following order: Whisper ≦ Normal < Fast in the different gradient modes. The image distortion increased in the following order: Without ≦ Weak < Strong in the different asymmetric echo modes. The image distortion increased in the following order: 300 Hz/pixel > 670 Hz/pixel ≧ REF (150 Hz/pixel) in the different Bw. The relationship between parameters and image distortion was clarified in this study when G-frames were used for gamma knife therapy. There is had relationship between the parameters causing variation in the gradient magnetic field and image distortion. Therefore, these parameters should be adjusted to minimize distortion.

Five-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Non-Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Based Target Definition and Moderate Dose Spillage Margin for Limited Brain Metastases With Impaired Renal Function

In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning for brain metastases (BMs), the target volume is usually defined as an enhancing lesion based on contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance images (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) images. However, contrast media (CM) are unsuitable for certain patients with impaired renal function. Herein, we describe two limited BM cases not amenable to CM, which were treated with five-fraction (fr) SRS, without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), through a target definition based on non-CE-MRI. These included synchronous and partly symptomatic four BMs from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Case 1) and one presymptomatic regrowing lesion after WBRT for BMs from lung adenocarcinoma (Case 2). In both cases, all BMs were visualized as well-demarcated mass lesions almost distinguishable from the affected parenchyma on non-CE-MRI, particularly on T2-weighted images (WI). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined mainly based on T2-WI under a comprehensive comparison of non-CE-T1/T2-WIs and CT for SRS planning under image co-registration and fusion. Stereotactic radiosurgery was implemented with volumetric modulated arcs using a 5-mm leaf width multileaf collimator, for both of which 5 fr was selected, considering the maximum tumor volume and the effects from WBRT, respectively. Dose distribution was designed to ensure a moderate dose attenuation margin outside the GTV boundary and a concentrically-laminated steep dose increase inside the GTV boundary. Specifically, the peripheries of the GTV and 2 mm outside the GTV boundary were covered by ≥43 Gy with <70% isodose relative to the maximum dose and ≥31 Gy, respectively. The not-too-steep dose spillage margin can cover potentially invisible tumor invasion outside the GTV and other inherent uncertainties regarding target definition and irradiation accuracy. Post-SRS tumor responses were excellent clinically and/or radiographically with mild adverse radiation effects in Case 2. In limited BM cases unsuitable to CM, multi-fraction SRS with non-CE-MRI-based GTV definition and sufficient GTV dose along with moderate dose spillage margin would be a valuable treatment option for selected cases, with the entire GTV boundaries being almost visible on non-CE-MRI.