[Preclinical management of multiple trauma]

Auswirkung der Implementierung eines Schockraumkoordinators auf Prozessparameter der Polytraumaversorgung im Schockraum eines Maximalversorgers

Hintergrund

In der Altersgruppe bis 40 Jahre stellt das schwere Trauma die häufigste Todesursache in Deutschland dar. Entsprechend der S3-Leitlinie „Polytrauma/Schwerverletztenbehandlung“ ist seit 2011 die Anwesenheit eines Schockraumkoordinators in Erwägung zu ziehen, der durch optimierte Versorgungs- und Behandlungsabläufe das Überleben der Patienten verbessern kann. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war die Analyse unterschiedlicher Prozessparameter zur Schockraumversorgung polytraumatisierter Patienten vor und nach Implementierung eines Schockraumkoordinators für die Polytraumaversorgung.

Material und Methoden

Um einen ausreichenden zeitlichen Abstand zum Zeitpunkt der Neueinführungen (2011) einzuhalten, wurden die Jahre 2009 und 2012 zum Vergleich herangezogen: Alle eingescannten Schockraumprotokolle der Jahre 2009 (01.01.2009–31.12.2009) und 2012 (01.01.2012–31.12.2012) wurden gesichtet und ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Aus dem Jahr 2009 wurden 213 und aus dem Jahr 2012 wurden 420 Schockraumeinsätze in die Auswertung einbezogen. Die durchschnittliche Schockraumanzahl lag im Jahr 2009 bei 17,8/Monat und im Jahr 2012 bei 35/Monat. Die mittlere Anzahl der Schockraumeinsätze hat sich nahezu verdoppelt (p < 0,001). Die mittlere Schockraumdauer lag im Jahr 2012 im Durchschnitt 5,8 min unter der im Jahr 2009 (p = 0,56).

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Patientenversorgung war in Anwesenheit eines Schockraumkoordinators bzw. nach Implementierung der SOP weder statistisch signifikant noch klinisch relevant verkürzt.

A comparison of airway management devices in simulated entrapment-trauma: a prospective manikin study

INTRODUCTION

In the patient entrapped after a motor vehicle collision (MVC), advanced airway management may need to be performed before extrication. The aim of this study was to compare four airway management devices utilized by paramedics in a simulated entrapped patient.

METHODS

Twenty-six paramedics performed advanced airway management on a manikin seated in the driver's seat (right side) of a car. Access was through the opened door only. The airway devices were the Macintosh laryngoscope and the Airtraq optical laryngoscope to facilitate the endotracheal intubation (ETI), the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme and the laryngeal tube (LT). Time to first successful ventilation and number of attempts required for successful placement were measured. Following each placement, participants rated the degree of difficulty. For ETI, participants ranked the achieved glottic view using Cormack-Lehane grades (CLG). Finally, participants were asked which airway management device they preferred.

RESULTS

The LMA Supreme had the shortest mean time to first successful ventilation (16.7 s, CI [0.95] 14.9-18.6). Insertion of the LMA Supreme and ETI with the Macintosh laryngoscope had 100% first-attempt success. The LMA Supreme was rated least difficult to insert (mean score 1.7/10 (CI [0.95] 1.2-2.1)). Compared to the Macintosh, the Airtraq laryngoscope facilitated superior laryngoscopy (CLG I view 46.2% and 80.8%, respectively). Most participants (10/26; 38%) chose the Macintosh laryngoscope as their preferred technique, followed closely by the LMA Supreme (9/26; 35%).

CONCLUSION

The LMA Supreme took the least amount of time and was the easiest to be inserted. Extraglottic airway devices may be beneficial alternative airway management devices to be considered by paramedics in the entrapped patient. Endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope was performed competently by participating paramedics. The Airtraq enabled superior laryngoscopy but resulted in poorer first-pass success rate.

[Trauma of the lumbar spine and the thoracolumbar junction]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Patients who have experienced high energy trauma have a particularly high risk of suffering from fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. The detection of spinal injuries and the correct classification of fractures before surgery are not only absolute requirements for the implementation of appropriate surgical treatment but they are also decisive for the choice of surgical procedure.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

By the application of spiral computed tomography (CT) crucial additional information on the morphology of the fracture can be gained in order to estimate the fracture type and possibly the indications for specific surgical treatment options. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is ideally suited to provide valuable additional information regarding injuries to the discoligamentous structures of the spine.

PERFORMANCE

Magerl et al. developed a comprehensive classification especially for injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine, which was adopted by the working group for osteosynthesis (AO). This is based on a 2‑pillar model of the spinal column. The classification is based on the pathomorphological characteristics of fractures recognizable by imaging. The injury pattern is of particular importance.

ACHIEVEMENTS

In spinal trauma a distinction is made between stable and unstable fractures. The treatment of spinal injuries depends on the severity of the overall injury pattern.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Besides adequate initial treatment at the scene, a trauma CT should be immediately carried out in order that no injuries are overlooked and to ensure a rapid decision on the treatment procedure.

Effect of Neck Collar Fixation on Ventilation in Multiple Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

According to the guidelines for treatment of multiple trauma patients, immobilization of the neck and neck collar fixation are essential. However, following neck collar fixation patients usually experience dyspnea. Some studies have found that neck collar fixation can lead to decreased pulmonary volumes, yet there have been no studies on the effect of neck collar fixation on patient ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of neck collar fixation on ventilation in multiple trauma patients.

METHODS

This study was a descriptive-analytical study, which was performed in the emergency department of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences on multiple trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15. The effect of neck collar fixation on ventilation in the study participants was examined with the use of capnography.

RESULTS

This study involved 163 multiple trauma patients. Of these, 65% were male. The mean of end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) of the patients without neck collars was 34.62 ± 4.46 and the mean ETCO₂ of the patients with neck collars was 34.21 ± 2.31. There was no significant difference between the means of ETCO₂, before and after removing the neck collar, among the studied patients (P = 0.196).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of our study, neck collar fixation has no effect on ventilation in multiple trauma patients.

Cervical collar effect on pulmonary volumes in patients with trauma

INTRODUCTION

According to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) for trauma patients, a cervical collar should be applied initially. Patients on backboards with a cervical collar mostly complain of dyspnea and tend to take the collar off or roll themselves off the backboard. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of collar removal on lung volumes and dyspnea in patients with GCS 15.

METHOD

In a physiological study, 50 trauma patients with a GCS of 15 were enrolled. We measured lung volumes before and after the application of a cervical collar in patients.

RESULTS

The average FEV1 in patients with and without a cervical collar was 89.08 ± 17.59 (% of predicted) and 98.26 ± 17.74 (% of predicted), respectively. The average FEF25-75 in patients with a cervical collar was 90.80 ± 26.07 (% of predicted) and in patients without a cervical collar it was 101.90 ± 23.06 (% of predicted). The average FEV1/FVC in patients with a cervical collar was 95.30 ± 18.55 % and in patients without a cervical collar it was 99.14 ± 18.12 %.

DISCUSSION

The FEV1, FEV6, FEV1/FEV6, PEF, FEF25-75, FVC, FEV1/FVC parameters of pulmonary function tests were significantly increased after collar removal.

CONCLUSION

Cervical collar applications in trauma patients cause a significant decrease in lung capacity and spirometry parameters. Patients suffering from lung diseases and respiratory distress require special attention which means that the cervical collar should be removed as soon as cervical injuries are ruled out so as to avoid hypoxia.

Prehospital fluid management of abdominal organ trauma patients--a matched pair analysis

PURPOSE

Severe bleeding after trauma frequently leads to a poor outcome. Prehospital fluid replacement therapy is considered an important primary treatment option. We conducted a retrospective matched pair analysis to assess the influence of prehospital fluid replacement volume on the clinical course of patients with solid abdominal organ trauma.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from 51,425 patients in TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society. Inclusion criteria were as follows: injury severity score ≥ 16 points, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, no isolated brain injury, transfusion of at least one unit of packed red blood cells (pRBCs), and systolic blood pressure ≥ 20 mmHg at the accident site. The patients were divided into "low-volume" (0-1000 ml) and "high-volume" (≥ 1,500 ml) groups according to the matched pair criteria. In each group, 68 patients met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Higher volume in fluid replacement was associated with increased need for transfusion (pRBCs: low-volume: 7.71 units, high-volume: 9.16 units; p = 0.074) and with by trend reduced clotting ability (prothrombin time: low-volume: 71.47 %, high-volume: 66.47 %; p = 0.27). The percentage of patients in shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) upon admission was equal in the two groups (25.0 %; p = 1). The mortality rate was discretely higher in the high-volume group (low-volume: 11.8 %, high-volume: 19.1 %; p = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive prehospital fluid replacement is able to lead in an increased mortality rate in patients with solid abdominal organ injury. Our results support the concept of restrained fluid replacement in the preclinical treatment of severe trauma patients.

Influence of prehospital fluid resuscitation on patients with multiple injuries in hemorrhagic shock in patients from the DGU trauma registry

Background:

Severe bleeding as a result of trauma frequently leads to poor outcome by means of direct or delayed mechanisms. Prehospital fluid therapy is still regarded as the main option of primary treatment in many rescue situations. Our study aimed to assess the influence of prehospital fluid replacement on the posttraumatic course of severely injured patients in a retrospective analysis of matched pairs.

Materials and Methods:

We reviewed data from 35,664 patients recorded in the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU). The following patients were selected: patients having an Injury Severity Score >16 points, who were ≥16 years of age, with trauma, excluding those with craniocerebral injuries, who were admitted directly to the participating hospitals from the accident site. All patients had recorded values for replaced volume and blood pressure, hemoglobin concentration, and units of packed red blood cells given. The patients were matched based on similar blood pressure characteristics, age groups, and type of accident to create pairs. Pairs were subdivided into two groups based on the volumes infused prior to hospitalization: group 1: 0-1500 (low), group 2: ≥2000 mL (high) volume.

Results:

We identified 1351 pairs consistent with the inclusion criteria. Patients in group 2 received significantly more packed red blood cells (group 1: 6.9 units, group 2: 9.2 units; P=0.001), they had a significantly reduced capacity of blood coagulation (prothrombin ratio: group 1: 72%, group 2: 61.4%; P≤0.001), and a lower hemoglobin value on arrival at hospital (group 1: 10.6 mg/dL, group 2: 9.1 mg/dL; P≤0.001). The number of ICU-free days concerning the first 30 days after trauma was significantly higher in group 1 (group 1: 11.5 d, group 2: 10.1 d; P≤0.001). By comparison, the rate of sepsis was significantly lower in the first group (group 1: 13.8%, group 2: 18.6%; P=0.002); the same applies to organ failure (group 1: 36.0%, group 2: 39.2%; P≤0.001).

Conclusion:

The high amounts of intravenous fluid replacement was related to early traumatic coagulopathy, organ failure, and sepsis rate.

[Time in care of trauma patients in the air rescue service: implications for disposition?]

BACKGROUND

Time plays a crucial role in treating multiple traumatized patients and delays in management worsen the prognosis. Furthermore, current studies show that trauma patients profit from primary delivery to a trauma center. Therefore, the goal of physician-staffed ground and air rescue services in Germany is to treat these patients as quickly as possible and deliver them to a suitable trauma center. The aim of the present study was to investigate prehospital treatment times for the air rescue team in terms of disposition and efficiency when a ground rescue team was already present at the scene.

METHODS

In a nationwide, multicenter analysis emergency missions carried out for traumatological emergencies in 2006 by 28 air rescue centers (ARC) of the TeamDRF and 6 ARC of the federal police were evaluated using the medical database MEDAT of the German Air Rescue Service. A distinction was made between combined missions with (MEDAT 1 group) and without (MEDAT 2 group) physician-staffed ground emergency medical services already being present at the emergency site and in particular the rescue helicopter treatment times for both groups were investigated. Furthermore, combined missions (MAN 1 group) and solo missions (MAN 2 group) for traumatological emergencies in the period 01.05.2006 to 31.01.2007 were investigated in a complementary prospective regional study at the ARC Heidelberg/Mannheim "Christoph 53". In both groups the total treatment times for all physician-staffed emergency systems involved in treatment at the scene were investigated.

RESULTS

Nationwide, 26,010 primary missions could be evaluated and of these, 11,464 missions were traumatological emergencies (44.1%) with 2,229 (19.4%) carried out by the MEDAT 1 group and 9,235 (80.6%) by the MEDAT 2 group. For both groups the helicopter treatment times depended on the severity of the injuries (NACA classification) and were between 17+/-12 min (NACA I) and 34+/-19 min (NACA VII) in MEDAT group 1 versus 21+/-10 and 36+/-19 min in MEDAT group 2 (p<0.05, p<0.001), respectively. In the MEDAT 1 group, the average treatment times were between 2.8 min (NACA VII) and 8.1 min (NACA VI) shorter compared with the MEDAT 2 group. Moreover, when taking the severity of the injury into consideration, a regular and significantly higher treatment effort (e.g. intubation, repositioning and chest tube insertion) and a greater proportion of patients who were transported to the clinic via rescue helicopter were observed for the MEDAT 1 group than for the MEDAT 2 group. In the regional study 670 primary missions were evaluated including 382 traumatological emergencies (57%). From these, 90 multiple trauma patients (NACA V) were not resuscitated or died at the scene, 58 from the MAN 1 group and 32 from the MAN 2 group, and were investigated more closely. The helicopter treatment times were comparable to those observed in the nationwide study and were found to be 26+/-12 min and 35+/-20 min (p<0.05), respectively. In the MAN 1 group the treatment times for the ground rescue services up to the time when the helicopter arrived was 22+/-11 min on average; the total treatment time was 48+/-15 min and 12+/-8 min longer than the time for the MAN 2 group, which was statistically significant. In the MAN 1 group the helicopter was alerted on average 17+/-15 min after the physician-staffed ground rescue services arrived at the emergency site. Treatment by the rescue helicopter teams was significantly more extensive in the MAN 1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment times for the helicopter were several minutes shorter when a physician-staffed ground rescue team had already arrived at the emergency site. However, it must be assumed that the total prehospital time is significantly longer for such missions. These results directly affect the disposition at the emergency dispatch center and indicate that when air rescue is required to transport a patient to hospital, the helicopter should be alerted at an early stage. In such settings, it is likely that initiating the operation in this way would improve the prognosis of severely injured patients and save costs.

[Emergency treatment of thoracic trauma]

Thoracic trauma, most often associated with other serious injuries, is the main cause of death in the first 45 years of life. The percentage of chest injuries in multiple trauma, mainly from blunt impact, has remained relatively constant at 80% during the last 30 years. Isolated thoracic injuries comprise only 25% of all trauma cases, 90% of chest injuries are due to blunt impact, while penetrating injuries make up 5-10%. Since 25% of deaths from trauma are attributable to chest injuries, they determine the survival rate in multiple trauma to a significant extent. The pattern of chest injuries is variable, frequently in different combinations comprising rib cage and diaphragm, lung parenchyma, airway and mediastinal organs. This article details the immediate simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the prehospital phase, management in the emergency room, the relative importance of computed tomography, ultrasound examination and endoscopy in the primary diagnostic evaluation and the principles of anaesthetic management of thoracic trauma.

[Spectrum of patients in prehospital emergency services. What has changed over the last 20 years?]

BACKGROUND

In Germany the physician staffed emergency systems have announced an increase in rescue missions over the years. The aim of this study is to analyse the development of the spectrum of patients in an emergency system over the last 20 years in order to highlight the significant changes.

METHODS

In a retrospective study we analyzed the prehospital chart views from 2004, 1992 and 1984 with respect to patients' demography, type of rescue mission, degree of internal disease or injury (NACA), state of consciousness (GCS), as well as prehospital interventions performed by prehospital emergency physician.

RESULTS

In 2004 (3,825), the absolute number of missions was 2 and 4 times higher than 1992 (2,114) and 1984 (957), resp. In all of these investigated time periods non-trauma missions (74%; 2,812 vs. 66%; 1,390 vs. 51%; 485) were leading, followed by trauma missions (18%; 690 vs. 22%; 464 vs. 39%; 375), aborted missions (3%; 126 vs. 7%; 154 vs. 6%; 56), and dead on arrival (5%; 197 vs. 5%; 106 vs. 4%; 41). Although, the percentage of patients with NACA IV-VI (39% vs. 50%) or patients with GCS < or =8 (18% vs. 34%) was lower in 2004, the absolute number of patients in each category was higher than in 1984 (NACA IV-VI: 1,434 vs. 448, p<0.01; GCS: 672 vs. 303, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate, that the percentage of trauma, severely ill/injured or unconscious patients is lower than in previous years. However, the higher absolute numbers of patients demonstrate that the emergency physician now encounters more critically ill/injured, unconscious and trauma patients. It does not seem necessary to question the qualifications for an emergency physician, which have previously been considered essential for the management of acute life-threatening situations.

Realistic assessment of the physican-staffed emergency services in Germany

In Germany the emergency medical services, which include dispatching emergency physicians to the scene, are considered to be among the best in the world. However, the hospitals admitting these patients still report shortcomings in prehospital care. The quality of an emergency medical service depends on both formal qualification and experience in managing such emergencies. Therefore, we determined how frequently emergency medical service physicians in Germany actually encountered complex and demanding emergency situations outside the hospital and how often they had to carry out emergency interventions. We therefore evaluated data from more than 82,000 ground emergency medical service scene calls registered in the MIND ("minimaler Notarztdatensatz") data base of the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany and more than 47,000 helicopter emergency medical service scene calls from the "Luftrettungs-, Informations- und Kommunikationssystem" (LIKS) data base of the German ADAC air rescue service. The results, which were unexpectedly distinct, impressively demonstrate that in part emergency medical service staff only encountered some emergencies very rarely. In particular, patients with life-threatening conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, head trauma, as well as multiple trauma were only treated once every 0.4-14.5 months and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation were only carried out once every 0.5-1.5 months. Furthermore, a time period of 6 months to more than 6 years may pass before a chest tube has to be placed. There are, of course, considerable differences between ground and helicopter emergency medical services. Particularly in areas where the frequency of such emergency cases is low, the clinical experience required to competently manage a demanding emergency situation cannot be gained or maintained just by working in the emergency medical system. As a result of the general pressure to cut costs and also of changes in hospital politics, however, only highly qualified and experienced emergency medical services may survive in Germany in the long term. In addition to formal qualifications and accompanying practice-related courses, future emergency medical service personnel should be drafted from clinical department staff that are experienced in treating severely ill and severely injured patients.

[The preclinical care of polytraumatized patients]

In industrially developed countries, trauma is the major mortality factor for people younger than 40 years. The preclinical management of polytraumatized patients influences the prognosis of mortality and morbidity. In this period, a number of decisions have to be made under unfavourable conditions and with limited time. This situation represents a great challenge for the whole rescue team. Diagnostic overview, protection of the vital functions under the special situation of shock, immobilization of the spine and the treatment of the isolated injuries are part of the preclinical management efforts. Rescue of the polytraumatized patient, organization and announcement of transfer and the protection of the rescue team have to be taken into account.

[Prehospital management of spinal cord injuries]

In both the United States and Europe about 10,000 patients suffer from spinal cord injury (SCI) each year and 20% die before being admitted to hospital. Prehospital management of SCI is very important since 25% of SCI damage may occur after the initial event. Emergency treatment includes examination of the patient, spinal immobilization, careful airway management, cardiovascular stabilization (maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure above 90 mmHg) and glucose levels within the normal range. From an evidence-based point of view, it is still not known whether additional specific therapy is useful and studies have not convincingly demonstrated that methylprednisolone (MPS) or other substances have clinically important benefits. Recently published statements from the US do not support the therapeutic use of MPS in patients suffering from SCI in the prehospital setting. Moreover, it is not known whether hypothermia or any other pharmacological interventions have beneficial effects. Networks for clinical studies in SCI patients should be established as a basic requirement for further improvement in outcome in these patients.