[Update: invasive fungal infections: Diagnosis and treatment in surgical intensive care medicine]

[Candiduria! What now? : Therapy of urinary tract infections with Candida]

BACKGROUND

Yeasts are found in urine specimens relatively often, especially in the elderly and patients under treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics, i. e. especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In some cases, the number of pathogens is very high, i. e. >10⁵/ml. The clinical relevance of detecting Candida in urine is difficult to assess. In the German S3 guidelines it is apodictically stated that an ascending infection of the urinary tract by yeasts does not occur but this may undoubtedly happen in certain instances in patients at risk, for example in the elderly, in diabetic persons and in the case of foreign bodies in the urinary tract. A hematogenous spread of yeasts can lead to pyelonephritis, which accompanies candiduria. In rare cases this can be induced by prostatitis and epididymitis. Therapy is indicated in all cases when a urological manipulation is planned, particularly those with injury to the mucosal barrier, in order to prevent an intraoperative spread of pathogens.

AIM

The antimicrobial agents suitable for therapy of candiduria are limited, namely flucytosine, amphotericin B, which is also used for irrigation and fluconazole.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The in vitro effect of nitroxoline on 100 isolates of yeasts from urine was tested by an agar diffusion test.

RESULTS

Nitroxoline exerted a good activity against all yeast isolates.

DISCUSSION

The antibiotic nitroxoline has a good antifungal activity. It achieves high concentrations in urine and in addition, it is effective at low pH as well as against pathogens in biofilms, which most antimycotics cannot achieve. Hence, nitroxoline is suitable for termination of candiduria. Foreign bodies in the urinary tract, on which biofilms are formed, should be removed whenever possible.

Antifungal therapy in patients with pulmonary Candida spp. colonization may have no beneficial effects

Background

In critically ill patients, Candida spp. can often be identified in pulmonary samples. The impact of prompt antifungal therapy in these patients is unknown.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 500 adult patients with pulmonary Candida spp. colonization admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2010 and 2012 were included. The patients were analyzed according to whether or not they received antifungal therapy, which was administered at the discretion of the attending physician. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of antifungal therapy on hospital mortality and new onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia. In a stepwise backward elimination, the impact of age, cancer as an underlying disease, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were considered.

Results

After excluding 178 patients with multifocal Candida spp., isolated pulmonary Candida spp. colonization was found in 322 patients (cohort 1). Pre-existing pneumonia was found in 147/322 patients. Out of the remaining 175 patients (cohort 2), 44 patients received any antifungal therapy, and 131 were defined as the control group. Patients who received antifungal therapy had higher hospital mortality (50 vs. 30 %, p = 0.02) and pneumonia rates (47.7 vs. 16.8 %; p < 0.001) than those who did not. In Cox regression analysis, antifungal therapy was not independently associated with favorable outcome (mortality: odds ratio 0.854 (95 % CI 0.467–1.561); new pneumonia: 1.048 (0.536–2.046)), but SAPS II and SOFA score were significantly (p < 0.05) independent covariates for worse outcome.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients with pulmonary Candida spp. colonization, antifungal therapy may not have an impact on the incidence of new pneumonia or in-hospital mortality after adjustment for confounders.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40560-015-0097-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Relevance of Candida and other mycoses for morbidity and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock due to peritonitis

This single-centre retrospective cohort study evaluated the incidence and outcome of mycoses in critical ill patients (n = 283) with sepsis due to peritonitis. Overall mortality was 41.3%, and the 28-day mortality was 29.3%. Fungal pathogens were found in 51.9%. The common first location was the respiratory tract (66.6%), followed by the abdominal site (19.7%). Candida colonisation was found in 64.6%, and invasive Candida infection in 34.0%. Identified fungi were Candida spp. in 98.6% and Aspergillus spp. in 6.1%. Patients with fungal pathogens showed a higher rate of postoperative peritonitis, APACHE II and tracheotomy. In comparison to patients without fungal pathogens, these patients showed a longer duration on mechanical ventilation, and a higher overall mortality. Patients with Candida-positive swabs from abdominal sites had more fascia dehiscence and anastomosis leakage. Seventy-two patients (48.9%) received antifungal therapy, 26 patients were treated empirically. Antifungal therapy was not associated with a decrease in mortality. Age and renal replacement therapy were associated with mortality. In conclusion, fungi are common pathogens in critically ill patients with peritonitis, and detection of fungi is associated with an increase in overall mortality. Particularly, Candida-positive abdominal swabs are associated with an increase in morbidity. However, we were not able to demonstrate a survival benefit for antifungal therapy in peritonitis patients.