Fähigkeitsbeeinträchtigungen und Teilhabeeinschränkungen: Erfassung und Quantifizierung in der sozialmedizinsichen Beurteilug von psychischen Störungen

Effects and Side Effects in a Short Work Coaching for Participants with and without Mental Illness

Employees with mental illness are often the first to be unable to cope with increasingly complex psychosocial work demands. But people without mental illness can also suffer from, for example, high workload. This study compares a short coaching to stabilize work ability for employees with and without mental illness regarding coaching topics, effects on work-related resources, goal attainment, and unwanted events. Individual coaching of three sessions (problem exploration by behavior analysis, practice of new behavior, reflection) was conducted with employees from different professional fields. A medical history was taken to determine whether participants are affected by a mental disorder. All coaching was conducted by the same behavior therapist in training (L.P.W.) under the supervision of an experienced behavior therapist (B.M.). Two hundred and three coachings with three sessions were completed. In total, 103 participants did not have a mental illness (51%), and 100 participants reported a mental disorder (49%). The coaching participants with mental illness had lower initial levels of work-related capacities (more severe impairments) and coping behavior as compared to the participants without mental illness. In the pre-post comparisons, both groups achieved significant improvements in work-related coping after the coaching. There were no differences in goal attainment between both groups. While participants without mental illness reported more unwanted events in parallel to the coaching (30% reported negative developments in life), participants with mental illness reported coaching-related unwanted events (20% felt to be dependent on the coach). Coaching with an individual focus on one topic can improve work-related resources in participants with and without mental disorders. Since participants with and without mental illness experience different unwanted events in coaching, psychotherapeutic expertise is needed in order to set the right focus.

Type, distribution, and frequency of psychological capacity disorders in patients with different somatic illnesses

PURPOSE

Somatic illnesses are often accompanied by (psychological) capacity impairments which impact on everyday life and work. The question is whether different somatic illnesses are associated with different capacity impairments, and whether impairment is more severe in cases of comorbid mental disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with neurological (N = 318), cardiological (N = 307) and orthopedic illness (N = 311) with and without comorbid mental illness according to MINI were investigated in a rehabilitation hospital. Psychological capacity impairments were assessed with the Mini-ICF-APP observer rating.

RESULTS

The "baseline rate" of capacity impairment in patients without mental illnesses was 40.7% in orthopedic, in 36% of cardiology patients (36.1%) and in 74.9% of neurology patients. Patients with additional comorbid mental disorders had stronger impairments than those without mental illness. The most heavily impaired group overall were neurology patients with comorbid mental illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic patients also have psychological impairments; these are more pronounced in the case of comorbid mental illnesses. It should be clearly explored whether psychological symptoms and impairment are an expression of the somatic illness per se, or due to a comorbid mental illness. Rehabilitation diagnostics should consider capacity impairments routinely in order to make indications for capacity trainings or context adjustment.

Self- and observer ratings of capacity limitations in patients with neurological conditions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the self- and observer ratings of capacity limitations in patients with neurological conditions. Research on this topic is relevant for assessing the patients' ability to participate in work and social life and improving collaborative patient-clinician relationships.

METHOD

The self- and observer ratings of capacity limitations in a sample of N = 245 patients with neurological conditions from a rehabilitation facility were compared and assessed using the short rating of activity limitations and participation restrictions in mental disorders according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (Mini-ICF-APP) and the equivalent self-rating questionnaire (Mini-ICF-APP-S).

RESULTS

Paired-samples t-tests revealed significant differences between the self- and observer ratings for six out of 13 capacity dimensions. On average, the patients rated the capacity dimensions adherence to regulations, planning and structuring of tasks, professional competency and endurance as significantly less limited, in comparison to the observers (small to medium effect sizes). The self-ratings for limitation of contact with others and self-care were only marginally higher than the observer ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings show that psychological capacity limitations occur in patients with neurological conditions. In clinical practice, limitations in each capacity dimension and discrepancies in patient- and clinician-ratings should be thoroughly assessed. This is especially relevant in patients with neurological conditions who have a potential tendency to underestimate or deny their disability.

[Participation Restriction and its Prediction in Victims of Acts of Violence During the Proceedings Under the Victims Compensation Act: A File-Based Exploratory Cohort Study]

After an act of violence, affected individuals not only suffer psychological and physical damage, but also impairment in their professional, social and societal participation. So far, however, no studies have been conducted examining the severity of participation restrictions and prognostically relevant characteristics. Using a category system, sociodemographic information as well as trauma-, crime- and health-specific characteristics of adult victims of acts of violence, whose entitlement to benefits were recognized under the German Victims Compensation Act (OEG), were recorded from files. Based on psychiatric assessments of damage, participation restrictions were also assessed post-hoc based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The data are extracted from 99 files; 72 of those affected were female. The average age of the victims at the time of the offence was 25 years. 53 were victims of sexual violence, 24 were victims of forms of bodily injury and 45 were victims of other acts of violence. 29 victims experienced more than one type of violence. All had at least one mental disorder with pathological significance. An average of four years passed between the first and second psychiatric assessment. While 85 of those affected stated that they had been employed before the offence, the number of employees dropped to 53 after the offence. The most pronounced participation restriction was found in professional participation. A multiple regression analysis revealed that a higher degree of participation restriction was associated with lack of employment and a stronger negative impact after the crime as well as the victim's familiarity with the perpetrator; but not associated with a mental disorder or a lack of a victim's trustworthy relationships. In future, participation restrictions should regularly be assessed based on the ICF during the psychiatric assessment. The results suggest that particularly benefits for professional participation are to be granted within the framework of the OEG.

International classification of diseases/disorders diagnosis and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health activity/participation limitation among psychiatric patients: a cross-sectional and exploratory study

To explore the relationships between international classification of diseases/disorders (ICD)-10 diagnoses and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) disability dimensions - activity and participation restriction among mental health service users. Three hundred sixty patients from different health services diagnosed with diverse mental disorders (ICD-10) participated in the study. Functioning restrictions were evaluated by use of the Mini-ICF-APP. Selected sociodemographic and clinical variables were also analysed. The Mini-ICF-APP scores correlated positively with the clinical impression of disease severity and negatively with general functioning. As independent factors determining the Mini-ICF-APP score, regression analysis suggests diagnosis and severity of disorder but also contextual factors such as general functioning and active occupation. Percentage and percentile distributions of activity and participation restrictions in diagnostic sections and categories revealed noticeable variability regardless of diagnosis-related differences. The diagnosis determines them neither in an ambiguous nor an absolute manner. There is a need to further explore the covariability between clinical diagnosis and ICF activity and participation restriction, particularly in regard the rationalization of social welfare benefits.