3
|
Rauer D, Gilles S, Wimmer M, Frank U, Mueller C, Musiol S, Vafadari B, Aglas L, Ferreira F, Schmitt‐Kopplin P, Durner J, Winkler JB, Ernst D, Behrendt H, Schmidt‐Weber CB, Traidl‐Hoffmann C, Alessandrini F. Ragweed plants grown under elevated CO 2 levels produce pollen which elicit stronger allergic lung inflammation. Allergy 2021; 76:1718-1730. [PMID: 33037672 DOI: 10.1111/all.14618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common ragweed has been spreading as a neophyte in Europe. Elevated CO2 levels, a hallmark of global climate change, have been shown to increase ragweed pollen production, but their effects on pollen allergenicity remain to be elucidated. METHODS Ragweed was grown in climate-controlled chambers under normal (380 ppm, control) or elevated (700 ppm, based on RCP4.5 scenario) CO2 levels. Aqueous pollen extracts (RWE) from control- or CO2 -pollen were administered in vivo in a mouse model for allergic disease (daily for 3-11 days, n = 5) and employed in human in vitro systems of nasal epithelial cells (HNECs), monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs), and HNEC-DC co-cultures. Additionally, adjuvant factors and metabolites in control- and CO2 -RWE were investigated using ELISA and untargeted metabolomics. RESULTS In vivo, CO2 -RWE induced stronger allergic lung inflammation compared to control-RWE, as indicated by lung inflammatory cell infiltrate and mediators, mucus hypersecretion, and serum total IgE. In vitro, HNECs stimulated with RWE increased indistinctively the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6). In contrast, supernatants from CO2 -RWE-stimulated HNECs, compared to control-RWE-stimulated HNECS, significantly increased TNF and decreased IL-10 production in DCs. Comparable results were obtained by stimulating DCs directly with RWEs. The metabolome analysis revealed differential expression of secondary plant metabolites in control- vs CO2 -RWE. Mixes of these metabolites elicited similar responses in DCs as compared to respective RWEs. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that elevated ambient CO2 levels elicit a stronger RWE-induced allergic response in vivo and in vitro and that RWE increased allergenicity depends on the interplay of multiple metabolites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Rauer
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
| | - Stefanie Gilles
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
| | - Maria Wimmer
- Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Helmholtz Zentrum München Munich Germany
- Members of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL) Munich Germany
| | - Ulrike Frank
- Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology (BIOP) Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
| | - Constanze Mueller
- BGC Research Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
| | - Stephanie Musiol
- Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Helmholtz Zentrum München Munich Germany
- Members of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL) Munich Germany
| | - Behnam Vafadari
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
| | - Lorenz Aglas
- Department of Biosciences University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria
| | - Fatima Ferreira
- Department of Biosciences University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria
| | | | - Jörg Durner
- Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology (BIOP) Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
| | - Jana Barbro Winkler
- Research Unit Environmental Simulation Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
| | - Dieter Ernst
- Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology (BIOP) Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
| | - Heidrun Behrendt
- Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Helmholtz Zentrum München Munich Germany
| | - Carsten B. Schmidt‐Weber
- Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Helmholtz Zentrum München Munich Germany
- Members of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL) Munich Germany
| | - Claudia Traidl‐Hoffmann
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine UNIKA‐T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München Augsburg Germany
- Outpatient Clinic for Environmental Medicine University Clinic Augsburg Augsburg Germany
- Christine‐Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐Care) Davos Switzerland
| | - Francesca Alessandrini
- Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich (TUM) and Helmholtz Zentrum München Munich Germany
- Members of the German Center of Lung Research (DZL) Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marselle MR, Hartig T, Cox DTC, de Bell S, Knapp S, Lindley S, Triguero-Mas M, Böhning-Gaese K, Braubach M, Cook PA, de Vries S, Heintz-Buschart A, Hofmann M, Irvine KN, Kabisch N, Kolek F, Kraemer R, Markevych I, Martens D, Müller R, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Potts JM, Stadler J, Walton S, Warber SL, Bonn A. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 150:106420. [PMID: 33556912 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Biodiversity is a cornerstone of human health and well-being. However, while evidence of the contributions of nature to human health is rapidly building, research into how biodiversity relates to human health remains limited in important respects. In particular, a better mechanistic understanding of the range of pathways through which biodiversity can influence human health is needed. These pathways relate to both psychological and social processes as well as biophysical processes. Building on evidence from across the natural, social and health sciences, we present a conceptual framework organizing the pathways linking biodiversity to human health. Four domains of pathways-both beneficial as well as harmful-link biodiversity with human health: (i) reducing harm (e.g. provision of medicines, decreasing exposure to air and noise pollution); (ii) restoring capacities (e.g. attention restoration, stress reduction); (iii) building capacities (e.g. promoting physical activity, transcendent experiences); and (iv) causing harm (e.g. dangerous wildlife, zoonotic diseases, allergens). We discuss how to test components of the biodiversity-health framework with available analytical approaches and existing datasets. In a world with accelerating declines in biodiversity, profound land-use change, and an increase in non-communicable and zoonotic diseases globally, greater understanding of these pathways can reinforce biodiversity conservation as a strategy for the promotion of health for both people and nature. We conclude by identifying research avenues and recommendations for policy and practice to foster biodiversity-focused public health actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa R Marselle
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Ecosystem Services, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, 07743 Jena, Germany; Institute of Psychological Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom.
| | - Terry Hartig
- Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Box 514, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Box 1225, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel T C Cox
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, United Kingdom
| | - Siân de Bell
- European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, United Kingdom
| | - Sonja Knapp
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Sarah Lindley
- Department of Geography, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Margarita Triguero-Mas
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katrin Böhning-Gaese
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt (Main), Germany; Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Institute for Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Max-von-Laue-Str. 13, 60439 Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| | - Matthias Braubach
- WHO Regional Office for Europe, European Centre for Environment and Health, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - Penny A Cook
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford M6 6PU, United Kingdom
| | - Sjerp de Vries
- Cultural Geography, Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Heintz-Buschart
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Soil Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Max Hofmann
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany; Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), Theodor-Lieser- Strasse 2, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katherine N Irvine
- Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom
| | - Nadja Kabisch
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Geography Department, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Franziska Kolek
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine, UNIKA-T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany - German Research Centre for Environmental Health, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Roland Kraemer
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Geography Department, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Iana Markevych
- Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 6, 33-332 Krakow, Poland
| | - Dörte Martens
- Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Faculty of Landscape Management and Nature Conservation, Eberswalde, Germany
| | - Ruth Müller
- Unit Entomology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium; Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt (Main), Germany
| | - Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacqueline M Potts
- Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom
| | - Jutta Stadler
- German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Germany
| | - Samantha Walton
- Department of English Literature, Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Sara L Warber
- European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3HD, United Kingdom; Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Aletta Bonn
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Ecosystem Services, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Straße 159, 07743 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Earth Observation Data Supporting Non-Communicable Disease Research: A Review. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12162541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
A disease is non-communicable when it is not transferred from one person to another. Typical examples include all types of cancer, diabetes, stroke, or allergies, as well as mental diseases. Non-communicable diseases have at least two things in common—environmental impact and chronicity. These diseases are often associated with reduced quality of life, a higher rate of premature deaths, and negative impacts on a countries’ economy due to healthcare costs and missing work force. Additionally, they affect the individual’s immune system, which increases susceptibility toward communicable diseases, such as the flu or other viral and bacterial infections. Thus, mitigating the effects of non-communicable diseases is one of the most pressing issues of modern medicine, healthcare, and governments in general. Apart from the predisposition toward such diseases (the genome), their occurrence is associated with environmental parameters that people are exposed to (the exposome). Exposure to stressors such as bad air or water quality, noise, extreme heat, or an overall unnatural surrounding all impact the susceptibility to non-communicable diseases. In the identification of such environmental parameters, geoinformation products derived from Earth Observation data acquired by satellites play an increasingly important role. In this paper, we present a review on the joint use of Earth Observation data and public health data for research on non-communicable diseases. We analyzed 146 articles from peer-reviewed journals (Impact Factor ≥ 2) from all over the world that included Earth Observation data and public health data for their assessments. Our results show that this field of synergistic geohealth analyses is still relatively young, with most studies published within the last five years and within national boundaries. While the contribution of Earth Observation, and especially remote sensing-derived geoinformation products on land surface dynamics is on the rise, there is still a huge potential for transdisciplinary integration into studies. We see the necessity for future research and advocate for the increased incorporation of thematically profound remote sensing products with high spatial and temporal resolution into the mapping of exposomes and thus the vulnerability and resilience assessment of a population regarding non-communicable diseases.
Collapse
|