1
|
Masood M, Low DE, Deal SB, Kozarek RA. Endoscopic Management of Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Complications. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2011. [PMID: 38610776 PMCID: PMC11012813 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Obesity is associated with several chronic conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and malignancy. Bariatric surgery, most commonly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, is an effective treatment modality for obesity and can improve associated comorbidities. Over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the rate of bariatric surgeries associated with the growing obesity epidemic. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most widely performed bariatric surgery currently, and while it serves as a durable option for some patients, it is important to note that several complications, including sleeve leak, stenosis, chronic fistula, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, may occur. Endoscopic methods to manage post-sleeve gastrectomy complications are often considered due to the risks associated with a reoperation, and endoscopy plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of post-sleeve gastrectomy complications. We perform a detailed review of the current endoscopic management of post-sleeve gastrectomy complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaaz Masood
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Donald E. Low
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
| | - Shanley B. Deal
- Division of General and Bariatric Surgery, Center for Weight Management, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
| | - Richard A. Kozarek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
- Center for Interventional Immunology, Benaroya Research Institute, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masood M, Low DE, Deal SB, Kozarek RA. Current Management and Treatment Paradigms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease following Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1246. [PMID: 38592683 PMCID: PMC10932325 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Obesity is associated with serious comorbidities and economic implications. Bariatric surgery, most commonly Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, are effective options for weight loss and the improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. With the growing obesity epidemic, there has been a concomitant rise in bariatric surgeries, particularly in sleeve gastrectomy, which has been the most widely performed bariatric surgery since 2013. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in obese individuals, can significantly impact quality of life and may lead to serious complications. Obesity and GERD both improve with weight loss. However, as the incidence of sleeve gastrectomy rises, recent data have revealed a risk of exacerbation of pre-existing GERD or the development of de novo GERD following sleeve gastrectomy. We performed a detailed review of GERD post-sleeve gastrectomy, including its overall incidence, pathophysiology and current treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaaz Masood
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
| | - Donald E. Low
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
| | - Shanley B. Deal
- Division of General and Bariatric Surgery, Center for Weight Management, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
| | - Richard A. Kozarek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Health, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA;
- Center for Interventional Immunology, Benaroya Research Institute, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scavone G, Castelli F, Caltabiano DC, Raciti MV, Ini' C, Basile A, Piazza L, Scavone A. Imaging features in management of laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass post-surgical complications. Heliyon 2021; 7:e07705. [PMID: 34401586 PMCID: PMC8353499 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity is a widespread pathology among the population related to an increase in mortality and morbidity of patients. Bariatric surgery provides several forms of treatment for obese patients. Laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) is a recent low risk bariatric surgical procedure common in a large number of countries in the treatment of severe obesity. MGB/OAGB, compared to other bariatric surgery techniques, offers the significant technical improvement of requiring only one anastomosis in place of two. In this scenario, diagnostic imaging takes a significant role in the postoperative period, to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment and to detect possible complications both in early and late postoperative period. The prevalent radiological procedure to investigate suspicions of clinical post-operative complications is Computed tomography (CT) with oral and intravenous contrast administration. This pictorial essay aims to illustrate and identify normal radiological aspects of MGB/OAGB and post-surgery complication imaging features. We think that this article will serve to familiarize all the specialists with the diagnostic imaging of MGB/OAGB. Laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) is a recent metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) technique that proved safe and valid for patients who were morbidly obese as a malabsorptive or metabolic gastric bypass. Diagnostic imaging takes a significant role in the postoperative period, to detect possible complications both in the early and late postoperative period. Water-soluble contrast upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series represent the first radiological modality in the detection of early postoperative complications. Computed tomography (CT) is a more frequently used imaging technique in the clinical suspicion of possible early and late postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Scavone
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, "Garibaldi Centro" Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesù, 5, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Federica Castelli
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, "Garibaldi Centro" Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesù, 5, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Daniele Carmelo Caltabiano
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, "Garibaldi Centro" Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesù, 5, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Raciti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Contrada Ferrante, 94100 Enna, Italy
| | - Corrado Ini'
- Department of Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G.Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Basile
- Department of Radiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G.Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Luigi Piazza
- General and Emergency Surgery Department, "Garibaldi Centro" Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesù, 5, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Scavone
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Neuroradiology and Interventional Radiology, "Garibaldi Centro" Hospital, Piazza Santa Maria di Gesù, 5, 95124 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gjeorgjievski M, Imam Z, Cappell MS, Jamil LH, Kahaleh M. A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:551-576. [PMID: 33234879 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus. OBJECTIVE To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed. DESIGN A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise. CONCLUSION Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Zaid Imam
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Mitchell S Cappell
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zacharoulis D, Perivoliotis K, Sioka E, Zachari E, Kapsoritakis A, Manolakis A, Tzovaras G. The use of over-the-scope clip in the treatment of persistent staple line leak after re-sleeve gastrectomy: Review of the literature. J Minim Access Surg 2017; 13:228-230. [PMID: 28607294 PMCID: PMC5485816 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_245_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Staple line leak after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a severe complication associated with increased mortality rates and the potential need for reoperation. We report the successful management of a re-SG staple line leak with the use of an endoscopic over-the-scope clip.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Zacharoulis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Eleni Sioka
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eleni Zachari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - Andreas Kapsoritakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - Anastassios Manolakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Postoperative peritonitis is still a life-threatening complication after abdominal surgery and approximately 10,000 patients annually develop postoperative peritonitis in Germany. Early recognition and diagnosis before the onset of sepsis has remained a clinical challenge as no single specific screening test is available. The aim of therapy is a rapid and effective control of the source of infection and antimicrobial therapy. After diagnosis of diffuse postoperative peritonitis surgical revision is usually inevitable after intestinal interventions. Peritonitis after liver, biliary or pancreatic surgery is managed as a rule by means of differentiated therapy approaches depending on the severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Lock
- Klinik & Poliklinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| | - C Eckmann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-,Thorax- und Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie, Klinikum Peine, Peine, Deutschland
| | - C-T Germer
- Klinik & Poliklinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after sphincter preserving anterior rectal resection in patients with rectal cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of AL on long-term survival has, however, still not been sufficiently investigated and is currently the subject of controversial discussion. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AL on long-term survival in patients with Union of International Cancer Control (UICC) (y)0-III stage mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter preserving rectal resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 108 patients with a mid-to-low rectal cancer (UICC stage (y)0-III) who underwent sphincter preserving surgery between January 2003 and October 2010 were identified within the institutional prospective colorectal cancer database. The impact of AL on 5-year overall (OS), cancer specific (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated. RESULTS The overall leakage rate was 17.6 % (grade A 4.6 %, grade B 4.6 % and grade C 8.3 %). After a median follow-up of 70 months (range 24-123 months), patients with an anastomotic leakage had a significantly decreased 5-year OS (63.6 % versus 87.8 %, p = 0.02), CSS (72.2 % versus 93.5 %, p = 0.02) and RFS rate (61.1 % versus 84.2 %, p = 0.01). In univariable Cox regression analysis AL was associated with an unfavorable OS (hazard ratio HR 3.05, 95 % CI: 1.11-8.39, p = 0.03), CSS (HR 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.13-15.70, p = 0.03) and RFS (HR 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.20-7.58, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION In the study cohort anastomotic leakage after sphincter preserving anterior resection in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer was associated with a significantly unfavorable impact on overall and oncological survival.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abou Rached A, Basile M, El Masri H. Gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy: Review of its prevention and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:13904-13910. [PMID: 25320526 PMCID: PMC4194572 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Revised: 05/21/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric sleeve gastrectomy has become a frequent bariatric procedure. Its apparent simplicity hides a number of serious, sometimes fatal, complications. This is more important in the absence of an internationally adopted algorithm for the management of the leaks complicating this operation. The debates exist even regarding the definition of a leak, with several classification systems that can be used to predict the cause of the leak, and also to determine the treatment plan. Causes of leak are classified as mechanical, technical and ischemic causes. After defining the possible causes, authors went into suggesting a number of preventive measures to decrease the leak rate, including gentle handling of tissues, staple line reinforcement, larger bougie size and routine use of methylene blue test per operatively. In our review, we noticed that the most important clinical sign or symptom in patients with gastric leaks are fever and tachycardia, which mandate the use of an abdominal computed tomography, associated with an upper gastrointrstinal series and/or gastroscopy if no leak was detected. After diagnosis, the management of leak depends mainly on the clinical condition of the patient and the onset time of leak. It varies between prompt surgical intervention in unstable patients and conservative management in stable ones in whom leaks present lately. The management options include also endoscopic interventions with closure techniques or more commonly exclusion techniques with an endoprosthesis. The aim of this review was to highlight the causes and thus the prevention modalities and find a standardized algorithm to deal with gastric leaks post sleeve gastrectomy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method. ISRN SURGERY 2013; 2013:960424. [PMID: 23986875 PMCID: PMC3748772 DOI: 10.1155/2013/960424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/14/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. To present our experience regarding the use of pancreatic stump occlusion technique as an alternative management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, hospital records of 93 patients who had undergone a Whipple's procedure for either pancreatic-periampullary cancer or chronic pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. In 37 patients the pancreatic duct was occluded by stapling and running suture without anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant, whereas in 56 patients a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. Operative data, postoperative complications, oncological parameters, and survival rates were recorded. Results. 2/37 patients of the occlusion group and 9/56 patients of the anastomosis group were treated for chronic pancreatitis, whereas 35/37 and 47/56 patients for periampullary malignancies. The duration of surgery for the anastomosis group was significantly longer (mean time 220 versus 180 minutes). Mean hospitalization time was 6 days for both groups. The occlusion group had a lower morbidity rate (24% versus 32%). With regard to postoperative complications, a slightly higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas was observed in the anastomosis group. Conclusions. Pancreatic remnant occlusion is a safe, technically feasible, and reducing postoperative complications alternative approach of the pancreatic stump during Whipple's procedure.
Collapse
|
10
|
Single-Stage Operative Management of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Without Endoscopic Stent Placement. Obes Surg 2013; 23:722-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-013-0906-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
11
|
Ahn YJ, Kim TH, Moon SW, Choi SN, Kim HJ, Jung WT, Lee OJ, Ko GH. [A case of perforated xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis presenting as biloma]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2012; 58:153-6. [PMID: 21960104 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2011.58.3.153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis is an unusual inflammatory disease of the gallbladder characterized by severe proliferative fibrosis and the accumulation of lipid-laden macrophages in areas of destructive inflammation. Its macroscopic appearance may occasionally be confused with gallbladder carcinoma. We present a case of perforated xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis presenting as biloma. An 80-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a 1-week history of abdominal pain and febrile sensation. Abdominal CT showed a biloma in the subhepatic area. The follow-up CT showed that the biloma increased in size. Therefore, ultrasonography-guided aspiration was performed. The aspirated fluid/serum bilirubin ratio was greater than 5, which was strongly suggestive of bile leakage complicated by perforated cholecystitis. She underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cyst aspiration and adhesiolysis. A histological diagnosis of perforated xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis was made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Jeong Ahn
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Pathology and Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cerroni M, Cirocchi R, Morelli U, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Mezzacapo M, Listorti C, Esperti L, Milani D, Avenia N, Gullà N, Noya G, Boselli C. Ghost Ileostomy with or without abdominal parietal split. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9:92. [PMID: 21849090 PMCID: PMC3170210 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2011] [Accepted: 08/18/2011] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In patients who undergo low anterior rectal resection, the fashioning of a covering stoma (CS) is still controversial. In fact, a covering stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) is worsened by major complications related to the procedure, longer recovery time, necessity of a re-intervention under general anesthesia for stoma closure and poorer quality of life. The advantage of Ghost Ileostomy (GI) is that an ileostomy can be performed only when there is clinical evidence of anastomotic leakage, without performing further interventions with related complications when anastomotic leak is absent and therefore the procedure is not necessary. Moreover, in case of anastomotic dehiscence and necessity of delayed stoma opening, mortality and morbidity in patients with GI are comparable with the ones that occur in patients which had a classic covering stoma. On the other hand, is simple to think about the possible economic saving: avoiding an admission for performing the closure of the ileostomy, with all the costs connected (OR, hospitalization, post-operative period, treatment of possible complications) represents a huge saving for the hospital management and also raise the quality of life of the patients. Methods In this study we prospectively analyzed 20 patients who underwent anterior extra-peritoneal rectum resection for rectal carcinoma with TME and fashioning of GI realized with or without abdominal parietal split. Results In the group of patients that received a GI without split laparotomy mortality was absent and in one case an anastomotic leak occurred. In the group of patients in which GI with split laparotomy was fashioned, one death occurred and there were one case of infection and one respiratory complication. Clinical follow-up was 12 months. Conclusions The use of different techniques for fashioning a GI do not present significant differences when they are performed by expert surgeons, but further evidence is needed with more randomized trials, in order to have more data supporting the clinical observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Cerroni
- Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, St, Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Surgical intensive care unit - essential for good outcome in major abdominal surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396:417-28. [PMID: 21369847 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0758-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2011] [Accepted: 02/16/2011] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgical intensive care units (ICU) play a pivotal role in perioperative care of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Differences in quality of care provided by medical staff in ICUs may be linked to improved outcome. This review aims to elucidate the relationship between quality of care at various ICUs and patient outcome, with the ultimate aim of identifying key measures for achieving optimal outcome. METHODS We reviewed the literature in PubMed to identify current ICU structural and process concepts and variations before evaluating their respective impact on quality of care and outcome in major abdominal surgery. RESULTS ICU leadership, nurse and physician staffing, and provision of an intermediate care unit are important structural components that impact on patients' outcome. A "mixed ICU" model, with intensivists primarily caring for the patients in close cooperation with the primary physician, seems to be the most effective ICU model. Surgeons' involvement in intensive care is essential, and a close cooperation between surgeons and anesthesiologists is vital for good outcome. Current general process concepts include early mobilization, enteral feeding, and optimal perioperative fluid management. To decrease failure-to-rescue rates, procedure-specific intensive care processes are particularly focused on the early detection, assessment, and timely and consistent treatment of complications. CONCLUSIONS Several structures and processes in the ICU have an impact on outcome in major abdominal surgery. ICU structures and care processes connected with optimal outcome could be transmitted to other centers to improve outcome, independent of procedure volume.
Collapse
|