Pseudarthrosen der langen Röhrenknochen

Volumetric evaluation of osteotomy gap following mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using a novel semi-automated approach: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To establish an analysis pipeline for the volumetric evaluation of the osteotomy site after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before, directly after BSSO, and 6-12 months after surgery. Image segmentations of each osteotomy gap data set were performed manually by four physicians and were compared to a semi-automatic segmentation approach.

RESULTS

Five patients with a total of ten osteotomy gaps were included. The mean interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of individual patients was 0.782 and the standard deviation 0.080 when using the manual segmentation approach. However, the mean ICC of the evaluation of anatomical sites and time points separately was 0.214, suggesting a large range of deviation within the manual segmentation of each rater. The standard deviation was 0.355, further highlighting the extent of the variation. In contrast, the semi-automatic approach had a mean ICC of 0.491 and a standard deviation of 0.365, which suggests a relatively higher agreement among the operators compared to the manual segmentation approach. Furthermore, the volume of the osteotomy gap in the semi-automatic approach showed the same tendency in every site as the manual segmentation approach, but with less deviation.

CONCLUSION

The semi-automatic approach developed in the present study proved to be valid as a standardised method with high repeatability. Such image analysis methods could help to quantify the progression of bone healing after BSSO and beyond, eventually facilitating the earlier identification of patients with retarded healing.

Preventing Atrophic Long-Bone Nonunion: Retrospective Analysis at a Level I Trauma Center

Background: Among the risk factors for nonunion are unchangeable patient factors such as the type of injury and comorbidities, and factors that can be influenced by the surgeon such as fracture treatment and the postoperative course. While there are numerous studies analyzing unchangeable factors, there is poor evidence for factors that can be affected by the physician. This raises the need to fill the existing knowledge gaps and lay the foundations for future prevention and in-depth treatment strategies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to illuminate knowledge about nonunion in general and uncover the possible reasons for their development; Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 327 patients from 2015 to 2020 from a level I trauma center in Germany. Information about patient characteristics, comorbidities, alcohol and nicotine abuse, fracture classification, type of osteosynthesis, etc., was collected. Matched pair analysis was performed, and statistical testing performed specifically for atrophic long-bone nonunion; Results: The type of osteosynthesis significantly affected the development of nonunion, with plate osteosynthesis being a predictor for nonunion. The use of wire cerclage did not affect the development of nonunion, nor did the use of NSAIDs, smoking, alcohol, osteoporosis and BMI; Conclusion: Knowledge about predictors for nonunion and strategies to avoid them can benefit the medical care of patients, possibly preventing the development of nonunion.

Quantifying bone healing after mandibular displacement in orthognathic surgery

Impaired bony healing following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a major unmet medical need for affected patients, and rare occurrences can hinder the identification of underlying risk factors. We hypothesised that osseous union following BSSO can be quantified using volumetric analysis, and we aimed to identify the risk factors for impaired bone healing. The percentage change in bony volume was measured in orthognathic patients following BSSO using two consecutive postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Patients' characteristics and treatment parameters were documented, and correlation and regression analyses of these variables performed. Thirty-six patients (23 men and 13 women) with a mean (SD) age of 33.28 (11.86) years were included. The gap site (lingual versus buccal) (p < 0.01) had a significant impact on the change in volume. Age (p = 0.06) showed a trend towards significance. Initial width of the osteotomy gap, sex, and indication for surgery did not influence osseous healing. Increased age at surgery and the side of the buccal osteotomy are independent risk factors for impaired osseous healing following BSSO.

[Extracorporeal shockwave therapy as an alternative treatment in cases of posttraumatic delayed bone union]

BACKGROUND

Impaired posttraumatic bone healing is a relevant complication of fractures. Usually, the standard treatment is surgical revision. For about 30 years extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as an alternative treatment option with similar consolidation rates but less complications.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to present our data in context to the current literature MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2016 a total of 97 patients diagnosed with impaired posttraumatic bone healing were treated with ESWT. Clinical and demographic data of this population were retrieved and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The general consolidation rate was 60.8%. Multiple variables were analyzed. A preinterventional bone gap ≥ 5 mm, initial dislocation > ½ of the bone shaft, nicotine consumption and a long time span from fracture to ESWT (> 6 months) were found as factors which significantly impair bone healing after ESWT.

CONCLUSION

ESWT is a safe and promising alternative treatment option for delayed unions. Regarding risk factors of a poor outcome may be identified before and increase the rate of success.

Pharmacological agents for bone fracture healing: talking points from recent clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological strategies might influence bone healing in terms of time to union or quality of mature bone. This expert opinion discussed the current level I evidence on the experimental pharmacological agents used to favor bone fracture healing.

AREAS COVERED

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In April 2023, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase. All the randomized clinical trials investigating pharmacological agents for bone fracture healing were accessed. No time constraint was set for the search. The search was restricted to RCTs. No additional filters were used in the database search. Data from 19 RCTs (4067 patients) were collected. 78% (3160 of 4067) were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 9.3 months (range, 1-26 months). The mean age of the patients was 64.4 years (range, 8-84 years).

EXPERT OPINION

Calcitonin could favor bone fracture healing. Bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronate, clodronate), monoclonal antibodies (denosumab, romosozumab), statins, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, strontium ranelate, and ibuprofen did not influence bony healing. Concerning the effect of parathormone, current level I evidence is controversial, and additional studies are required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, systematic review of RCTs.

Matched-Pair Analysis: Large-Sized Defects in Surgery of Lower Limb Nonunions

BACKGROUND

The treatment of large-sized bone defects remains a major challenge in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Although there are many treatment options, there is still no clear guidance on surgical management, and the influence of defect size on radiological and clinical outcome remains unclear due to the small number of affected patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of defect size on the outcome of atrophic and infected nonunions of the tibia or the femur based on the diamond concept in order to provide recommendations for treatment guidance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All medical records, surgical reports, laboratory data and radiological images of patients treated surgically for atrophic or infected nonunions of the lower limbs (femur or tibia) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 were examined. Patients with proximal, diaphyseal or distal nonunions of the femur or tibia who were surgically treated at our institution according to the "diamond concept" and attended our standardised follow-up program were included in a database. Surgical treatment was performed as a one- or two-step procedure, depending on the type of nonunion. Patients with a segmental bone defect ≥5 cm were matched with patients suffering a bone defect <5 cm based on five established criteria. According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 patients with a bone defect ≥5 cm were suitable for analysis. Two groups were formed by matching: the study group (bone defect ≥5 cm; n = 39) and control group (bone defect <5 cm; n = 39). The study was approved by the local ethics committee (S-262/2017).

RESULTS

The mean defect size was 7.13 cm in the study and 2.09 cm in the control group. The chi-square test showed equal consolidation rates between the groups (SG: 53.8%; CG: 66.7%). However, the Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test showed a significant difference regarding the mean duration until consolidation was achieved, with an average of 15.95 months in the study and 9.24 months in the control group (α = 0.05, p = 0.001). Linear regression showed a significant increase in consolidation duration with increasing defect size (R² = 0.121, p = 0.021). Logistic regression modelling showed a significant negative correlation between consolidation rate and revision performance, as well as an increasing number of revisions, prior surgeries and total number of surgeries performed on the limb. Clinical outcomes showed equal full weight bearing of the lower extremity after 5.54 months in the study vs. 4.86 months in the control group (p = 0.267).

CONCLUSION

Surprisingly, defect size does not seem to have a significant effect on the consolidation rate and should not be seen as a risk factor. However, for the treatment of large-sized nonunions, the follow-up period should be prolonged up to 24 months, due to the extended time until consolidation will be achieved. This period should also pass before a premature revision with new bone augmentation is performed. In addition, it should be kept in mind that as the number of previous surgeries and revisions increases, the prospects for consolidation decrease and a change in therapeutic approach may be required.

Proximal ulna non-union: treatment concept and postoperative outcome

PURPOSE

Non-union of the proximal ulna is a serious complication after surgical treatment of olecranon and complex elbow fractures, frequently leading to poor functional outcome. To date, there is a lack of data regarding optimal treatment strategies and functional outcome parameters after surgical revision.

METHODS

From 02/2010 to 12/2018, 31 patients undergoing surgical treatment of proximal ulna non-union could be included. Follow-up period was seven years (SD 2.5 years). All patients were clinically assessed using a clinical assessment tool set and standard elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH score). All complications and unplanned revision surgeries were recorded and all radiographic material was analyzed.

RESULTS

Initial non-union procedures were performed at an average of 6.6 months (SD 3 months) after the index procedures. Those included the use of autologous spongiosa graft in all patients and concomitant compression re-osteosynthesis in 28 patients. Radiological consolidation was achieved in all patients. Overall, patients achieved a good to fair functional outcome with Mayo elbow performance score measuring 78.5 (SD 9.1), DASH score 34.7 (SD 14.4), and Oxford elbow score 31.2 (SD 6.6) points. Initial malreduction/implant-malposition could be identified as a main reason for the occurrence of the non-union. Furthermore, inferior postoperative outcome was detected in patients > 60 years and BMI > 30 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

Using a standardized protocol, bony union and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved in proximal ulna non-unions. However, surgeons should be aware of potential risk factors and proper initial fracture reduction as key to achieve sufficient bone healing.

Prevalence and risk factors for pseudarthrosis in humeral shaft fractures treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: A 10-year review

Introduction

Fractures of the humeral shaft account for about 3% to 5% of all fractures. Although conservative treatment remains the first choice, there are a number of surgical indications. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis shows good functional results. However, complications have been reported, such as non-union.

Objective

To assess the prevalence and risk factors for non-union after treatment of humeral shaft fractures using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was carried out in patients treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis between 2009 and 2019. Demographic data and variables related to the fracture that could influence bone healing were analysed. The unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used for the statistical analyses. Categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

The study population showed a male predominance (53 of 75, 70.7%). The average time for fracture healing was 19.8 ± 15.3 weeks. Seven patients developed non-union. Only the presence of an open fracture increased the likelihood of non-union.

Conclusions

The prevalence of non-union in patients treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis was 9.3%. Patients with open fractures were six times more likely to progress to non-union. Fracture characteristics (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification, fracture location and plate working length) did not influence progression to non-union.

Biophysical Stimulation in Delayed Fracture Healing of Hand Phalanx: A Radiographic Evaluation

Phalangeal fractures are common events among the upper limbs accounting for 10% of all human body fractures. Fracture complete healing process may persevere several months or years. Most phalangeal fractures present favorable union within 3 to 6 weeks. In the literature, biophysical stimulation has yielded favorable outcomes in the treatment of hand fractures. A survey involving hospitals in the US reported the use of biophysical stimulation (72%) in relation to nonhealing fractures at three months after trauma. A noninvasive procedure such as biophysical stimulation may be preferential prior to consideration of invasive procedures. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 80 phalangeal fractures, 43 of which did not show any radiographic sign of healing 30 days after surgery; on radiograms, we calculated radiographic data and the total active motion (TAM) for clinical comparison. All radiographic images were evaluated using Adobe Photoshop CS3 (version 10.0, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). We calculated the index of relative bone healing each month after surgery starting from 30 days, which was considered as T1, and followed up for a total of 6 months after stimulation (T6) with better results in stimulated groups. We concluded that prompt administration of biophysical stimulation supports fracture healing and yields an important improvement in the union rate compared with nontreatment. Above all, our patients experienced less injury-related distress between the fracture and repair period, which consequently reduced immobilization time, envisaging an early rehabilitation interval, with a better patient hand outcome.

[Update on non-unions 2022 : Imaging diagnostics, classification and treatment algorithms]

BACKGROUND

Fracture healing is a complex regenerative process. An unconsolidated fracture that will not heal without further surgical intervention is called non-union. The causes are multifactorial. Diagnostic imaging is a central pillar and provides insights into the morphology and biology of the fracture as a basis for optimal surgical treatment decisions.

AIM

Knowledge of fracture healing, targeted radiological and nuclear medical diagnostics, and interdisciplinary standardized classification are of high importance for optimal treatment.

METHODS

In this article, the proven and modern diagnostic procedures are presented, an overview of the currently used scoring and classification models is given and the optimal therapeutic approach based on the extended "diamond concept" is addressed. A possible diagnostic and therapeutic approach is shown using an algorithm.

CONCLUSION

For successful treatment of pseudarthrosis, targeted radiological and nuclear medical diagnostics with old established but also newest methods, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and hybrid imaging, are necessary. An exact classification of non-unions using additional classification models makes it possible to determine and carry out the optimal surgical treatment at an early stage.

[Diagnostics and classification of non-unions]

BACKGROUND

Non-union is defined as an insufficiently consolidated fracture in which healing without a surgical intervention is no longer foreseeable. Several underlying predispositions and factors have to be taken into account in order to optimize the diagnostics, classification and surgical treatment of this complex and challenging pathology.

OBJECTIVE

As the patient-specific optimized treatment sometimes pursues different goals depending on the specific subtype of non-union, an agreement on the most important parameters within the framework of a standardized classification is of crucial importance. In addition to established diagnostic algorithms, this article also describes modern radiologic diagnostic methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In addition to the clinical examination, the diagnostics of non-union are mainly based on radiological imaging using X‑ray or computed tomography. Complex fracture morphology or uncertainty, particularly regarding the infection status and perfusion of non-union, can be an indication for an extension of the diagnostics using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

CONCLUSION

A practicable and precise classification of the different types of non-union can only be successful based on a focussed diagnostic procedure using radiologic and functional diagnostic tools, which guide the surgeon in establishing the optimal treatment. This also includes modern functional imaging examinations, such as CEUS and DCE-MRI.

[Options for soft tissue reconstruction in pseudarthrosis]

BACKGROUND

Pseudarthrosis can develop as a complication after conservative or operative fracture treatment and after elective orthopedic surgery. The treatment is challenging and is made more difficult when accompanied by large soft tissue defects or impairments in wound healing. In this case close and early coordination between trauma and plastic surgeons is crucial in order to develop a coherent and interdisciplinary treatment plan.

METHODS

Due to the positive effects on bone consolidation and osteomyelitis, timely soft tissue reconstruction via a pedicled vascularized flap or free flap coverage should be preferred. If blood circulation in the affected extremity appears to be compromised, this should first be optimized by vascular intervention or bypass surgery. In atrophic, aseptic pseudarthrosis, bone and soft tissue reconstruction can be performed consecutively in one single procedure, whereas septic pseudarthrosis always require complete resection of all infected debris prior to wound closure. Examples of two commonly used free flaps are the latissimus dorsi muscle flap and the fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. As multiple variations have been described for both procedures, the reconstructive portfolio lists many additional options available for soft tissue reconstruction. Fasciocutaneous flaps should be preferred whenever bone consolidation requires additional surgical interventions in the future.

Stammzellen in der Regenerativen Medizin – Translationale Hürden und Möglichkeiten zur Überwindung

Der Einsatz von mesenchymalen Stammzellen in der regenerativen Medizin wird immer populärer. Nichtsdestotrotz ist ihre Anwendung im klinischen Alltag noch immer limitiert. Zahlreiche ethische, rechtliche und translationale Probleme sowie Ungewissheit bzgl. der Sicherheit hemmen noch immer die Entstehung von entsprechenden Therapien aus vielversprechenden wissenschaftlichen Ansätzen.

Diese Arbeit soll die Hauptprobleme bei der Translation von stammzellbasierten Therapien aus der Grundlagenforschung und Präklinik in den klinischen Alltag darstellen, sowie Ansätze aufzeigen, diese zu überwinden.