[Pre- and postoperative quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis with ileoanal pouch operation]

Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications

The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40^th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.

A longitudinal study of quality of life and functional outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is considered the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis. It is safe and effective but associated with long-term complications, making functional outcome and quality of life important factors in determining patient outcome. Longitudinal studies on long-term functional outcome and quality of life are sparse. The purpose of this study was to longitudinally evaluate the long-term functional outcome and quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients who underwent proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

METHODS

The study group was composed of ulcerative colitis patients who underwent pouch operation in our institution between 1990 and 2001 who had filled in quality of life and functional outcome questionnaires 60 months (mean) after ileostomy closure and responded to the same questionnaires at 133 months (mean) after ileostomy closure. They served as their own controls. Quality of life was scored using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36. Global Assessment of Functioning Scale was used to evaluate functional outcome.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 63 of the 77 patients (82%) who had answered the first questionnaire. The mean interval between responding to the 2 questionnaires was 73 +/- 3 months. Functional outcome did not deteriorate over time. Some quality of life scores (bodily pain, general health perception, and the physical component summary) worsened over time, whereas the other scales of the Short Form 36 scores did not change.

CONCLUSION

The functional outcome of ulcerative colitis patients after a pouch operation did not change significantly over time. The overall quality of life was generally stable, however, some aspects did deteriorate over time. These findings merit further investigation.

Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess quality of life (QOL) in a long-term follow-up of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) 10 years and more after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) to correlate these results with pouch function and to assess the long-term pouch failure rate.

METHODS

In a unicentric study, 294 consecutive patients after IPAA between 1988 and 1996 were identified from a prospective database. QOL was evaluated according to the validated Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

RESULTS

Overall median follow-up was 11.5 years. Thirty-seven patients experienced pouch failure (12.6%). The rates of ileal pouch success after 5, 10 and 15 years were 92.3%, 88.7% and 84.5%. According to the GIQLI, patients with a functioning pouch achieved a mean score of 107.8, reflecting a decrease of QOL of 10.8% compared to a healthy population. There were significant negative correlations between QOL and an age of >50 years (p < 0.05), pouchitis, perianal inflammation and increased stool frequency (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

QOL and functional results of patients with UC 10 years or more after IPAA were acceptable; however, those were reduced when compared to a healthy population. Pouch failure rate still increases up to 15.5% 15 years after IPAA. This result represents an important issue in providing patients with comprehensive preoperative information.

Preoperative and postoperative quality of life in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to prospectively examine functional outcome, quality of life, and patients' personal experiences and adjustment to functional changes during the first year after prophylactic surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were examined before proctocolectomy (T0), on ileostomy reversal (T1), and 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) after surgery by means of standardized questionnaires and interviews.

RESULTS

Average physical and mental health declined profoundly after proctocolectomy, followed by a steady improvement after 6 and 12 months. The majority of patients reported the ileostomy period as particularly distressing. After one year, 75 percent of patients reported complete recovery in terms of physical, emotional, and social functioning, whereas one-quarter of patients did not regain their former level of functioning. Despite substantial improvement in pouch functions, functional impairment persists because of frequent bowel movements, resulting mainly in restricted social activities. Ten percent of patients reported impaired sex life, irrespective of gender.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were found to adjust favorably to functional impairment while maintaining satisfactory quality of life. Complementing standardized quality of life measures by patients' personal experiences may help to identify vulnerable patients in need of psychosocial support.

Complicações imediatas e tardias após cirurgia de reservatório ileal na polipose adenomatosa familiar

RACIONAL: A retocolectomia total com confecção de reservatório ileal é cirurgia ideal para o tratamento do cólon e reto dos doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar, no entanto pode estar associada a complicações no pós-operatório imediato e tardio. OBJETIVO: Estudar as complicações pós-operatórias da cirurgia do reservatório ileal na polipose adenomatosa familiar. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 69 doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar submetidos a cirurgia de reservatório ileal no período de 1984 a 2006, pelo Grupo de Coloproctologia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP. O seguimento médio pós-operatório foi de 82 (2-280) meses. Dados de interesse: ocorrência de complicações no pós-operatório. RESULTADOS: A morbidade e mortalidade foram de 63,8% e 2,9%, respectivamente. As complicações mais freqüentes foram obstrução intestinal (17,4%), estenose da anastomose (15,9%) e sepse pélvica (10,1%). Outras complicações foram isquemia aguda do reservatório ileal (4,3%), ileíte do reservatório (" pouchitis" ) (2,9%) e fístulas relacionadas ao reservatório (2,9%). CONCLUSÕES: A morbimortalidade foi semelhante à da literatura e aceitável para uma cirurgia complexa como é a do reservatório ileal, realizada em dois tempos operatórios. A obstrução intestinal foi a complicação mais freqüente. Entretanto, isquemia do reservatório, " pouchitis" e sepse pélvica constituíram importantes complicações relacionadas à perda do reservatório ileal.

A comparison of adverse events and functional outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

Restorative proctocolectomy is the procedure of choice for patients undergoing proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis or ulcerative colitis. This meta-analysis was designed to identify differences in adverse events and functional outcomes between these two groups.

METHODS

Studies published between 1986 and 2003 that compared outcomes between patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis were included. Meta-analytical techniques using random effect models were used to compare short-term and long-term adverse events as well as functional outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies comprising 5,199 patients (familial adenomatous polyposis, 782; ulcerative colitis, 4,417) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in immediate postoperative adverse events between the two groups. Pouch-related fistulation was significantly increased in the ulcerative colitis group (10.5 percent vs. familial adenomatous polyposis 4.8 percent; odds ratio 2.31; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pouch failure between the two groups (ulcerative colitis 5.8 percent vs. familial adenomatous polyposis 4.5 percent; odds ratio 1.22; P = 0.43). The incidence of pouchitis was significantly greater in the ulcerative colitis group (30.1 vs. 5.5 percent; odds ratio 6.44; P < 0.001). Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis had a significant advantage in stool frequency with one less motion per 24 hours (95 percent confidence interval, 0.21-1.76; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to studies reporting similar outcomes for patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis or ulcerative colitis, the present meta-analysis suggested that patients with ulcerative colitis are at greater risk of pouch-related fistulation and pouchitis. Although there was an increase in the 24-hour stool frequency in the ulcerative colitis group, this may be accounted for by the younger age at surgery in the familial adenomatous polyposis group.

Prophylaktische Chirurgie der familiären adenomatösen Polyposis coli

Familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP) may not be considered a single disease entity with standardized guidelines for operative treatment. However, prophylactic colectomy after the manifestation of polyps but prior to the development of colorectal cancer is essential. The optimal timing of prophylactic surgery remains a clinical decision taken independently of mutation analysis. In case of the classic FAP phenotype, restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice. The development of reliable guidelines for attenuated FAP variants requires further evidence from clinical studies on surgical strategy and the advantages of prophylactic surgery over regular endoscopic screening with removal of polyps.

A longitudinal study of long-term quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of longitudinal long-term studies of quality of life (QOL) after surgery with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis, where cohorts of patients are used as their own controls.

METHODS

Forty ulcerative colitis patients who had undergone IPAA were prospectively assessed while they had a temporary ileostomy, and at a median of 18 months and 7 years after ileostomy closure. QOL was measured with the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale and the Well-Being Profile.

RESULTS

QOL was good at all three time points and, with some exceptions, did not change significantly between the assessments. There was a high degree of stability in the patients' evaluation of their QOL over time.

CONCLUSIONS

QOL was already good when the patients had a temporary ileostomy and generally did neither improve nor deteriorate during 7 years after ileostomy closure. QOL was also quite stable in terms of individual differences.

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of life with emphasis on bowel function in patients undergoing either total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 151 patients operated on in our department between 1971 and 2000 were analysed retrospectively. Since 42 patients had to undergo reoperations, a total of 194 bowel procedures were performed. The final operative breakdown was: 48 IRA, 62 IPAA, 33 total proctocolectomies and 8 other procedures. By the end of the period under consideration, 40 patients had died, 28 had been lost to follow-up, 83 patients were still alive and of these 76 were analysed. Continence function and quality of life with emphasis on overall bowel function (Wexner (WS)-, Jostarndt (JS)-, Oresland (OS)- and Pemberton (PS)-scores) were recorded in 59 patients (22 IRA and 37 IAP).

RESULTS

Continence and bowel function were significantly better after IRA than after IPAA (mean scores: WS, 1.1 vs 5.4, P=0.001; JS, 32.5 vs 24.7, P=0.0001; OS, 2.9 vs 7.9, P=0.0001), as was quality of life (PS, 25.6 vs 19.6, P=0.001). The mean values for each single item of all 4 scores were consistently better after IRA. Neither gender, age nor type of pouch-anal anastomosis (stapled vs hand-sewn) had a significant influence on outcome. IPAA patients with uneventful follow-up (n = 27) had better mean values for all 4 scores (WS, 4.2 vs 7.3; JS, 26.1 vs 23.1; PS, 20.4 vs 17.7; OS, 6.6 vs 9.9) than those with postoperative complications (n = 10; 27%), but statistical significance was reached only in the OS (P = 0.026). No such difference was seen after IRA (14% complication rate).

CONCLUSION

The significantly better continence after IRA resulting in superior patient comfort and quality of life must be balanced against the oncological disadvantage of this procedure. On the basis of large patient population studies, genotype-phenotype correlations with respect to the risk for rectal cancer may need to be taken into account. Postoperative complications may have a lasting negative effect on outcome after IPAA.

Digest:

For this quarter's digest, Professor Christian Herfarth and Dr Thomas Lehnert have selected the best from the October to December 1998 issues of Der Chirurg. A digest for the BJS for the same period, written by Mr Colin Johnson, appears in the German journal.