[Adverse reactions to metal orthopedic implants after knee arthroplasty]

Clinical Results of Revision TKA in Patients With Presumed Metal and Cement Allergy

BACKGROUND

Metal and cement allergy affects a small subset of patients, causing severe pain and often systemic reaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Revision with ceramic-surfaced femoral components has been reported to resolve these symptoms of metal allergy, but no solution currently is available for patients with allergies to metal and bone cement.

METHODS

Five patients (5 knees) with documented metal allergy were revised with custom porous-coated ceramic femoral components (Magnesia-stabilized Zirconia) from January 2007 to January 2013. An additional 23 patients (23 knees) met inclusion criteria from 2007 to 2015, but because the ceramic implant was unavailable, they underwent different treatment based on their underlying allergy to metal, cement, or both. Inclusion criteria included the history of clinically documented severe metal allergy, severe pain, swelling, and effusion >1 year after TKA, negative workup for infection, loosening, and ligament imbalance. Knee Society scores were compared for each cohort.

RESULTS

Mean Knee Society scores for all 5 patients revised with custom cementless ceramic femoral components improved significantly for objective score (preoperative, 39 ± 5; most recent visit, 90 ± 2) and function score (preoperative, 33 ± 8; most recent visit 93 ± 4) (P < .0001). The 12 knees revised with off-the-shelf cemented ceramic-coated femoral components had similar results. The 7 unrevised knees (including 4 knees with allergy to metal and bone cement) and the 4 knees revised with standard CoCr femoral components did not improve and worsened over time.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms resolved in the 5 patients revised with custom ceramic implants and in the 12 patients revised with ceramic-coated components, but did not improve in the patients unrevised or revised with CoCr femoral components. Symptoms presumed to be associated with metal or cement allergy improve with the use of ceramic femoral surfaces, but patients who are allergic both to metals and bone cement would be candidates only for porous-coated ceramic implants fixed without bone cement.

Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study

This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.

Large Soft-tissue Mass Formation After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Unusual Case of Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris and Review of the Literature

We report about the rare case of a patient who developed large soft-tissue mass formations related with revision total knee arthroplasty which was implanted 4 years prior. Owing to suspected periprosthetic joint infection, the prosthesis was removed and the lesions were resected, resulting in severe soft-tissue loss and temporary arthrodesis using a poly(methyl methacrylate) spacer. Histological analysis revealed a type VI periprosthetic membrane. The situation was further complicated by wound infection requiring multiple revision surgeries. After discussion and evaluation of the available treatment options, the decision for an above-the-knee amputation was made. The tissue reaction resulting in these soft-tissue lesions is referred to as an "adverse local tissue reaction." Wear-induced lesions after total knee arthroplasty, especially of this magnitude, are very rare and difficult to treat.

Metal Hypersensitivity in Joint Arthroplasty

Metal hypersensitivity in joint arthroplasty is a very controversial topic with limited evidence. With increasing numbers of joint replacements being done annually, a clear understanding of the pathogenesis, clinical picture, preimplant screening, postimplant workup, and treatment plan is crucial. This review article looked at all the available evidence regarding metal hypersensitivity and summarized the key findings. An algorithm was also proposed for preimplant screening, postimplant workup, and management.

Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

There is ongoing discussion about arthroplasty surgery of patients with metal hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and eosinophil counts of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients with and without a history of metal hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of the medical records of 148 extremities of 140 consecutive patients who underwent primary UKA between January 2016 and December 2017. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened for history of metal hypersensitivity using a questionnaire. The functional outcomes of patients and eosinophil levels were evaluated immediately before and at 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 37 months (range, 18-48 months). Of the total 128 patients, 13 (10.2%) reported a history of metal hypersensitivity before the operation. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with or without a history of metal hypersensitivity in respect of the functional outcomes or eosinophil counts (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that the functional outcomes of patients who underwent UKA using a standard alloy did not change between the groups who reported having or not having a history of metal hypersensitivity. Although the study also showed that the eosinophil counts decreased after surgery compared to the preoperative counts, there was no statistical relationship between the eosinophil count and functional outcomes or metal hypersensitivity history.

[ARMD reaction patterns in knee arthroplasty : A novel hypothetical mechanism: hingiosis]

BACKGROUND

There are case descriptions of pronounced peri-implant inflammatory reactions and necrosis in non-infectious knee joint replacements with metal-polyethylene pairing.

OBJECTIVES

Due to the histopathological similarities to the dysfunctional metal-on-metal (MoM) hip joint replacement, MoM-like reactions in knee joint arthroplasty ("ARMD-KEP") are proposed and a histopathological comparison is made.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This analysis evaluates five cases of "ARMD-KEP" using: (1) the SLIM consensus classification, (2) the particle algorithm, (3) the CD3 focus score and (4) the AVAL score. The comparison groups consist of 11 adverse cases of MoM hip and 20 cases of knee joint arthroplasty without adverse reaction.

RESULTS

The ARMD-KEP cases were identified as SLIM type VI. Their median ALVAL score was 10. The CD3 focus score confirmed an adverse reaction. Particle corrosion was found in two of five cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This data indicates that, in rare cases, an adverse MoM-like reaction may be present in knee replacements, with inflammatory and immunological expression similar to that of the adverse MoM reaction in the hip. The pathomechanisms can be discussed as follows: (1) secondary metal-metal contact, (2) dysfunctional loading of the coupling mechanism and (3) corrosion of the metal components. Much like trunnionosis in the hip, the term "hingiosis" is proposed for corrosion phenomena in dysfunctional conditions of coupled knee endoprosthetic systems.

Long-term outcome after implantation of a nickel-containing cemented hip stem on the right in a patient with type IV sensitization to nickel sulphate

Type IV allergies to nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate and/or cobalt chloride are supposed to be associated with aseptic loosening, pain or infections in patients with hip arthroplasty. However, there is debate on any causal relation between type IV sensitization to metals and any of these complications. We report on a patient with suspicion of pre-existing type IV sensitization to nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate who did not show any complications after hip arthroplasty.

CD3+ lymphocytosis in the peri-implant membrane of 222 loosened joint endoprostheses depends on the tribological pairing

Background and purpose - The most frequent cause of arthroplasty failure is aseptic loosening-often induced by particles. Abrasion material triggers inflammatory reactions with lymphocytic infiltration and the formation of synovial-like interface membranes (SLIM) in the bone-implant interface. We analyzed CD3 quantities in SLIM depending on articulating materials and possible influences of proven material allergies on CD3 quantities. Patients and methods - 222 SLIM probes were obtained from revision surgeries of loosened hip and knee arthroplasties. SLIM cases were categorized according to the SLIM-consensus classification and to the particle algorithm. The CD3 quantities were analyzed immunohistochemically, quantified, and correlated to the particle types. Results - Metal-metal pairings showed the highest CD3 quantities (mean 1,367 counted cells). CD3 quantities of metal-polyethylene (mean 243), ceramic-polyethylene (mean 182), and ceramic-ceramic pairings (mean 124) were significantly smaller. Patients with contact allergy to implant materials had high but not statistically significantly higher CD3 quantities than patients without allergies. For objective assessment of the CD3 response as result of a pronounced inflammatory reaction with high lymphocytosis (adverse reaction), a defined CD3 quantity per high power field was established, the "CD3 focus score" (447 cells/0.3 mm², sensitivity 0.92; specificity 0.90; positive predictive value 0.71; negative predictive value 0.98). Interpretation - The high CD3 quantities for metal-metal pairings may be interpreted as substrate for previously described adverse reactions that cause severe peri-implant tissue destruction and SLIM formation. It remains unclear whether the low CD3 quantities with only slight differences in the various non-metal-metal pairings and documented contact allergies to implant materials have a direct pathogenetic relevance.

Metal wear-induced pseudotumour following an endoprosthetic knee replacement for Ewing sarcoma

Pseudotumours are well recognised as a complication of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties and are thought to develop on the basis of an innate and adaptive immune response to cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) wear particles. We report a case of a large pseudotumour that developed following a knee endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) undertaken for Ewing sarcoma. The lesion contained necrotic and degenerate connective tissue in which there were numerous scattered metal wear-containing macrophages, eosinophil polymorphs, lymphocytes, plasma cells and aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vascular-associated lesion-like lymphoid aggregates. Metal ion levels were elevated. No evidence of infection or tumour was noted and it was concluded that the lesion was most likely an inflammatory pseudotumour developing on the basis of an innate and adaptive immune response to components of Co-Cr metal wear derived from the knee EPR.