1
|
Timar M, Saki N, Bayat A, Hanafi M. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 75:197-203. [PMID: 37206753 PMCID: PMC10188708 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03339-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) has been successful in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) over the last few years. This study assessed the auditory and speech performance results of pediatrics with inner ear malformations (IEMs) following cochlear implantation at the Ahvaz cochlear implantation center and compared the outcomes of various malformations. All pediatrics with IEMs undergoing CI were included in the study. This retrospective study was performed on pediatrics with congenital IEMs who underwent cochlear implantation in Ahvaz cochlear implantation center between 2014 and 2019. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores are two of the most frequently administered tests. The CAP with ranging from 0 (displays no awareness of environmental sounds) to 7 (can use the telephone with a familiar talker), was used to measure the speech perception performance of the implanted children. Furthermore, SIR consists of five performance categories ranging from "prerecognizable words in spoken language" to "connected speech is intelligible to all listeners". Finally, the study included 22 patients. The evaluation of the CT-Scan revealed three types of inner ear malformation: Incomplete Partition (IP)-I in 2 (9.1%), IP-II in 12 (54.5%), and common cavity in 8 (36.4%) individuals. The results were shown that the median CAP score preoperative was 0.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-2) and postoperative was 3.5 (IQR: 3-7). There were statistically significant differences in CAP scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.036). The results were shown that the median SIR score preoperative was 1 (IQR: 1-5) and postoperative was 2 (IQR: 1-5). There were statistically significant differences in SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.001). Following a thorough preoperative screening, patients with specific IEMs can be candidates for CI and not a contraindication. There were statistically significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative in the common cavity and IP-II groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Timar
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Nader Saki
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Associate Professor of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medicine of School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Arash Bayat
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Associate Professor of Audiology, Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammadghasem Hanafi
- Hearing Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller A, Kropp MH, Mir-Salim P, Aristeidou A, Dziemba OC. Intraoperatives Tip-Foldover-Screening mittels Spread of Excitation Messungen. Z Med Phys 2020; 31:276-288. [PMID: 32900558 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In rare cases, a cochlear implantation can lead to a so-called tip fold-over during insertion of the electrode array. In order to detect or exclude such a misalignment a radiological check of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array is carried out intra- or often post-operatively (gold standard), thereby exposing the patient to additional radiation. Alternatively, successful electrode insertion can be verified by measuring the spread of excitation (SOE). However, interpretation of the test results requires considerable expertise, and standardized measurement protocols and reference values are also essential. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate an automated screening procedure in order to obtain a reliable statement about the normal tonotopic position of the implanted CI electrode array intraoperatively and with as little effort as possible. METHODS For CI surgery with Cochlear™ Nucleus® implants, an intraoperative tip-fold-over (TFO) screening was performed in a bi-centric study in over 100 adult patients: Firstly, threshold measurements for electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) using AutoNRT™ were recorded. Subsequently, SOE measurements were carried out on electrodes 13 and 22. The automated evaluation of the SOE data sets then made it possible to make a dichotomous decision about a normal or abnormal test result. The position of the electrode array was checked intra- or post-operatively using conventional transorbital X-ray (reference method). RESULTS The intraoperative TFO screening procedure is applicable in around 80% of cases. The accuracy of the screening for measurements via the active stimulation electrodes 13 / 22 is 63.9% / 95.4%. The classification error is 36.1% / 4.6% and the phi coefficient is 0.27 / 0.69. All radiologically proven tip-fold-overs were reliably identified with the intraoperative screening (sensitivity = 100%). A higher specificity (>95%) can be achieved only with measurements via electrode 22. CONCLUSIONS The TFO Screening via measurement at electrode 22 can successfully distinguish between a correct and incorrect position of the electrode array due to a tip-fold-over, and the remaining cases would require further imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Müller
- Hörzentrum Berlin (HZB), Klinik für HNO, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Miriam H Kropp
- Hörzentrum Berlin (HZB), Klinik für HNO, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Parwis Mir-Salim
- Hörzentrum Berlin (HZB), Klinik für HNO, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Aristotelis Aristeidou
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Greifswald, Deutschland
| | - Oliver C Dziemba
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Greifswald, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rotter N, Schmitz B, Sommer F, Röhrer S, Schuler PJ, Bischof F, Scheithauer MO, Hoffmann TK. First use of flat-panel computed tomography during cochlear implant surgery : Perspectives for the use of advanced therapies in cochlear implantation. HNO 2017; 65:61-65. [PMID: 27534759 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0213-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implantation in routine cases with normal anatomy is commonly performed without intraoperative image guidance. Revision cochlear implantation as well as surgery in malformations require not only a precise understanding of the underlying complex anatomy, but surgeons need to transform two-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) scans into the surgical field and use this information for intraoperative surgical navigation. So far, information about the exact position of the electrode during insertion cannot be provided to the surgeon. Here, we present our first operative experience with cochlear implant surgery supported by intraoperative Dyna-CT technology, providing the surgeon with detailed views of the electrode location. METHODS To prove the feasibility of the procedure, two cases of cochlear implantation were performed with intraoperative application of cone-beam CT acquired by a C-arm Dyna-CT system (Artis Zeego, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Image reconstruction was performed intraoperatively in order to assess the correct positioning of the electrodes. RESULTS Intraoperative Dyna-CT enabled clear visualization of the surgical anatomy and intracochlear electrode position. Dyna-CT technology can be applied with acceptable additional time requirements without adding too much complexity to the surgical procedure. CONCLUSION Intraoperative data acquisition by Dyna-CT represents a suitable option for online surgical navigation during cochlear implant surgery. This imaging technology will push further advances in cochlear implant surgery and lateral skull base surgery, particularly if linked to intraoperative navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Rotter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
| | - B Schmitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - F Sommer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Röhrer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - P J Schuler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - F Bischof
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - M O Scheithauer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| | - T K Hoffmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Frauensteige 12, 89075, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grauvogel TD, Engelskirchen P, Semper-Hogg W, Grauvogel J, Laszig R. Navigation accuracy after automatic- and hybrid-surface registration in sinus and skull base surgery. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0180975. [PMID: 28700740 PMCID: PMC5507282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Computer-aided-surgery in ENT surgery is mainly used for sinus surgery but navigation accuracy still reaches its limits for skull base procedures. Knowledge of navigation accuracy in distinct anatomical regions is therefore mandatory. This study examined whether navigation accuracy can be improved in specific anatomical localizations by using hybrid registration technique. Study design Experimental phantom study. Setting Operating room. Subjects and methods The gold standard of screw registration was compared with automatic LED-mask-registration alone, and in combination with additional surface matching. 3D-printer-based skull models with individual fabricated silicone skin were used for the experiments. Overall navigation accuracy considering 26 target fiducials distributed over each skull was measured as well as the accuracy on selected anatomic localizations. Results Overall navigation accuracy was <1.0 mm in all cases, showing the significantly lowest values after screw registration (0.66 ± 0.08 mm), followed by hybrid registration (0.83± 0.08 mm), and sole mask registration (0.92 ± 0.13 mm).On selected anatomic localizations screw registration was significantly superior on the sphenoid sinus and on the internal auditory canal. However, mask registration showed significantly better accuracy results on the midface. Navigation accuracy on skull base localizations could be significantly improved by the combination of mask registration and additional surface matching. Conclusion Overall navigation accuracy gives no sufficient information regarding navigation accuracy in a distinct anatomic area. The non-invasive LED-mask-registration proved to be an alternative in clinical routine showing best accuracy results on the midface. For challenging skull base procedures a hybrid registration technique is recommendable which improves navigation accuracy significantly in this operating field. Invasive registration procedures are reserved for selected challenging skull base operations where the required high precision warrants the invasiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Daniela Grauvogel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Paul Engelskirchen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Wiebke Semper-Hogg
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Juergen Grauvogel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Roland Laszig
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
7
|
Huber M, Pletzer B, Giourgas A, Nickisch A, Kunze S, Illg A. Schooling Relates to Mental Health Problems in Adolescents with Cochlear Implants-Mediation by Hearing and Family Variables. Front Psychol 2015; 6:1889. [PMID: 26733898 PMCID: PMC4683195 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of this multicenter study was to investigate whether schooling relates to mental health problems of adolescents with cochlear implants (CI) and how this relationship is mediated by hearing and family variables. One hundred and forty secondary school students with CI (mean age = 14.7 years, SD = 1.5), their hearing parents and teachers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Additional audiological tests (speech comprehension tests in quiet and noise) were performed. Students of special schools for hearing impaired persons (SSHIs) showed significantly more conduct problems (p < 0.05) and a significantly higher total difficulty score (TDS) (p < 0.05) compared to students of mainstream schools. Mental health problems did not differ between SSHI students with sign language education and SSHI students with oral education. Late implanted students and those with indication for additional handicaps were equally distributed among mainstream schools and SSHIs. However, students in SSHIs were more restricted to understand speech in noise, had a lower social background and were more likely to come from single-parent families. These factors were found to be partial mediators of the differences in mental health problems between the two school types. However, no variable could explain comprehensively, why students of SSHIs have more mental health problems than mainstream pupils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
| | - Belinda Pletzer
- Department of Psychology and Center for Neurocognitive Research, University of Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alexandros Giourgas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Nickisch
- Department of Hearing-Language-Cochlear Implants, kbo-Kinderzentrum München Munich, Germany
| | - Silke Kunze
- Department of Hearing-Language-Cochlear Implants, kbo-Kinderzentrum München Munich, Germany
| | - Angelika Illg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huber M, Burger T, Illg A, Kunze S, Giourgas A, Braun L, Kröger S, Nickisch A, Rasp G, Becker A, Keilmann A. Mental health problems in adolescents with cochlear implants: peer problems persist after controlling for additional handicaps. Front Psychol 2015; 6:953. [PMID: 26236251 PMCID: PMC4502340 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of the present multi-center study were to investigate the extent of mental health problems in adolescents with a hearing loss and cochlear implants (CIs) in comparison to normal hearing (NH) peers and to investigate possible relations between the extent of mental health problems of young CI users and hearing variables, such as age at implantation, or functional gain of CI. The survey included 140 adolescents with CI (mean age = 14.7, SD = 1.5 years) and 140 NH adolescents (mean age = 14.8, SD = 1.4 years), their parents and teachers. Participants were matched by age, gender and social background. Within the CI group, 35 adolescents were identified as “risk cases” due to possible and manifest additional handicaps, and 11 adolescents were non-classifiable. Mental health problems were assessed with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in the versions “Self,” “Parent,” and “Teacher.” The CI group showed significantly more “Peer Problems” than the NH group. When the CI group was split into a “risk-group” (35 “risk cases” and 11 non-classifiable persons) and a “non-risk group” (n = 94), increased peer problems were perceived in both CI subgroups by adolescents themselves. However, no further differences between the CI non-risk group and the NH group were observed in any rater. The CI risk-group showed significantly more hyperactivity compared to the NH group and more hyperactivity and conduct problems compared to the CI non-risk group. Cluster analyses confirmed that there were significantly more adolescents with high problems in the CI risk-group compared to the CI non-risk group and the NH group. Adolescents with CI, who were able to understand speech in noise had significantly less difficulties compared to constricted CI users. Parents, teachers, and clinicians should be aware that CI users with additionally special needs may have mental health problems. However, peer problems were also experienced by CI adolescents without additional handicaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thorsten Burger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cochlear Implant Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | - Angelika Illg
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany
| | - Silke Kunze
- Socialpediatric Center Munich Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ludwig Braun
- Section of Communication Disorders, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Mainz Mainz, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kröger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cochlear Implant Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Gerhard Rasp
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Goettingen Goettingen, Germany
| | - Annerose Keilmann
- Section of Communication Disorders, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Mainz Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Genetic Mutations in Children with Ear and Brain Anomalies. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:696281. [PMID: 26236732 PMCID: PMC4506828 DOI: 10.1155/2015/696281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background. Specific clinical conditions could compromise cochlear implantation outcomes and drastically reduce the chance of an acceptable development of perceptual and linguistic capabilities. These conditions should certainly include the presence of inner ear malformations or brain abnormalities. The aims of this work were to study the diagnostic value of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants and to analyse the anatomic abnormalities of the ear and brain in patients who underwent cochlear implantation. We also analysed the effects of ear malformations and brain anomalies on the CI outcomes, speculating on their potential role in the management of language developmental disorders. Methods. The present study is a retrospective observational review of cochlear implant outcomes among hearing-impaired children who presented ear and/or brain anomalies at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. Furthermore, genetic results from molecular genetic investigations (GJB2/GJB6 and, additionally, in selected cases, SLC26A4 or mitochondrial-DNA mutations) on this study group were herein described. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis was conducted using statistical tests. Results. Between January 1, 1996 and April 1, 2012, at the ENT-Audiology Department of the University Hospital of Ferrara, 620 cochlear implantations were performed. There were 426 implanted children at the time of the present study (who were <18 years). Among these, 143 patients (64 females and 79 males) presented ear and/or brain anomalies/lesions/malformations at neuroimaging investigations with MRI and HRCT. The age of the main study group (143 implanted children) ranged from 9 months and 16 years (average = 4.4; median = 3.0). Conclusions. Good outcomes with cochlear implants are possible in patients who present with inner ear or brain abnormalities, even if central nervous system anomalies represent a negative prognostic factor that is made worse by the concomitant presence of cochlear malformations. Common cavity and stenosis of the internal auditory canal (less than 2 mm) are negative prognostic factors even if brain lesions are absent.
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Bille J, Fink-Jensen V, Ovesen T. Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 272:583-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-2883-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Schick B, Dlugaiczyk J. Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2013; 12:Doc05. [PMID: 24403973 PMCID: PMC3884540 DOI: 10.3205/cto000097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base is a fascinating, yet challenging field in otorhinolaryngology. A thorough knowledge of the associated complications and pitfalls is indispensable for the surgeon, not only to provide the best possible care to his patients, but also to further improve his surgical skills. Following a summary about general aspects in pre-, intra-and postoperative care of patients with disorders of the ear/lateral skull base, this article covers the most common pitfalls and complications in stapes surgery, cochlear implantation and surgery of vestibular schwannomas and jugulotympanal paragangliomas. Based on these exemplary procedures, basic "dos and don'ts" of skull base surgery are explained, which the reader can easily transfer to other disorders. Special emphasis is laid on functional aspects, such as hearing, balance and facial nerve function. Furthermore, the topics of infection, bleeding, skull base defects, quality of life and indication for revision surgery are discussed. An open communication about complications and pitfalls in ear/lateral skull base surgery among surgeons is a prerequisite for the further advancement of this fascinating field in ENT surgery. This article is meant to be a contribution to this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Schick
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Julia Dlugaiczyk
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Janeschik S, Teschendorf M, Bagus H, Arweiler-Harbeck D. Influence of etiologic factors on speech perception of cochlear-implanted children. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14:190-9. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762812y.0000000017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
14
|
Sainz M, Fernández E, García-Valdecasas J, Aviñoa A. Neural Distribution of Hearing Structures in Inner Ear Malformations and the Need of Further Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategies. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 11 Suppl 1:204-6. [DOI: 10.1179/146701010x12671177818902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
15
|
Aschendorff A. Imaging in cochlear implant patients. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2012; 10:Doc07. [PMID: 22558057 PMCID: PMC3341584 DOI: 10.3205/cto000080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Imaging procedures are a mainstream tool in the daily ENT workflow. Cochlear Implant patients are representing a special population with specific demands for imaging. There are different imaging techniques available for pre-operative evaluation, surgery and postoperative controls with different indications and consequences. High-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are mainly used in the evaluation process. New procedures, as digital volume tomography, are increasingly used intra- and postoperatively. Especially the intracochlear positioning in malformations of the inner ear, eventually added with radiological assisted navigation, can be considered a standard of modern cochlear implant surgery. In addition, digital volume tomography may serve as a quality control tool focusing on the evaluation of the intracochlear electrode position. The range of applications, indications and current results are illustrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antje Aschendorff
- HNO-Klinik und Implant Centrum Freiburg, Universität Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Pakdaman MN, Herrmann BS, Curtin HD, Van Beek-King J, Lee DJ. Cochlear Implantation in Children with Anomalous Cochleovestibular Anatomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 146:180-90. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599811429244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To determine the influence of inner ear dysplasia on both surgical and audiologic outcomes following pediatric cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Data Sources. MEDLINE (1982-2009) and data from Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Review Methods. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Variables assessed included age at implantation, duration of CI use, radiologic and operative findings, and speech perception outcome data. Results. The initial search yielded 1326 articles. Including data from our own study, twenty-two fulfilled criteria for inclusion, representing 311 patients. Data for bilateral implants were recorded only for the first implant. Data on simultaneous bilateral implants were not recorded. The most common anomaly seen was large vestibular aqueduct (89/311 or 29%). When comparing patients with mild-moderate or severe dysplasia, rates of cerebrospinal fluid gusher were 31% versus 35% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50), anomalous facial nerve anatomy was seen in 11% versus 51% (OR = 0.15), and postoperative speech perception abilities were found in 84% versus 54% (OR = 1.93), respectively. A large heterogeneity was found among studies regarding all outcome measures. Conclusion. Although we found that severe inner ear dysplasia was associated with increased surgical difficulty and lower speech perception, the lack of uniformity in published clinical data limited the strength of these results. Standardization of surgical and radiologic reporting as well as more consistent speech perception testing is needed to better determine the association between anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N. Pakdaman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barbara S. Herrmann
- Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hugh D. Curtin
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica Van Beek-King
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Daniel J. Lee
- Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arndt S, Beck R, Schild C, Grauvogel T, Laszig R, Aschendorff A. Management of cochlear implantation in patients with malformations. Clin Otolaryngol 2010; 35:220-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02124.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The CHARGE syndrome is associated with ear anomalies and deafness in addition to other malformations. Deformations of the ossicles or aplasia of the semicircular canals, cochlear hypoplasia, hypoplasia or aplasia of the VIIIth cranial nerve and abnormal routing of the VIIth cranial nerve, sigmoid sinus, and emissaries are typical findings. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and procedure of cochlear implantation in patients with CHARGE syndrome and to assess the outcome. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary referral center; cochlear implant program. PATIENTS Ten patients with CHARGE syndrome and 3 patients with CHARGE-like syndrome treated in our center due to hearing impairment. Eleven patients were congenitally deaf, 1 patient had progressive hearing loss, and 1 patient had mixed hearing loss. INTERVENTION Computed tomography of temporal bones and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain; bone-anchored hearing aid surgery, cochlear implantation, rehabilitation results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Surgical suitability and hearing rehabilitation. RESULTS We illustrate the management of preoperative diagnostics, surgical planning, and hearing rehabilitation. One patient with mixed hearing loss underwent bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid surgery. Because 2 patients had bilateral aplasia of the auditory nerves, we recommended an auditory brainstem implant. The unilateral cochlear implantation was performed in 9 patients and bilateral in 1 patient. In selected cases, it was helpful to plan the operation using a simulator for temporal bone surgery. Complex malformations, such as in CHARGE syndrome, with an increased intraoperative risk for complications should be facilitated by using intraoperative digital volume tomography-assisted navigation and intraoperative digital volume tomography control of electrode position. The results after CI surgery vary due to the differing extent of additional disabilities such as developmental delay, intellectual delay, and visual impairment. Nine of our patients showed improved responsiveness with the cochlear implant. Open speech comprehension could not be observed in 8 patients, whereas the follow-up period was less than 1 year in 4 patients. The relatively high age of our patients at implantation might be an important factor. CONCLUSION Careful planning of the treatment of CHARGE syndrome patients with sensorineural hearing loss can, to a limited extent, lead to auditory benefit without increasing surgical complications. Cochlear implantation is therefore indicated after critical assessment.
Collapse
|