[Why do osteosyntheses fail? The problem with biomechanics and biology]

Hardware Removal in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Management Algorithm

Background

Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Open reduction and internal fixation can be complicated by hardware exposure or infection. The literature often does not differentiate between these 2 entities; so for this study, we have considered all hardware exposures as hardware infections. Approximately 5% of adults with CMF trauma are thought to develop hardware infections. Management consists of either removing the hardware versus leaving it in situ. The optimal approach has not been investigated. Thus, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken and a resultant evidence-based approach to the treatment and management of CMF hardware infections was devised.

Materials and Methods

A comprehensive search of journal articles was performed in parallel using MEDLINE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect electronic databases. Keywords and phrases used were maxillofacial injuries; facial bones; wounds and injuries; fracture fixation, internal; wound infection; and infection. Our search yielded 529 articles. To focus on CMF fractures with hardware infections, the full text of English-language articles was reviewed to identify articles focusing on the evaluation and management of infected hardware in CMF trauma. Each article’s reference list was manually reviewed and citation analysis performed to identify articles missed by the search strategy. There were 259 articles that met the full inclusion criteria and form the basis of this systematic review. The articles were rated based on the level of evidence. There were 81 grade II articles included in the meta-analysis.

Result

Our meta-analysis revealed that 7503 patients were treated with hardware for CMF fractures in the 81 grade II articles. Hardware infection occurred in 510 (6.8%) of these patients. Of those infections, hardware removal occurred in 264 (51.8%) patients; hardware was left in place in 166 (32.6%) patients; and in 80 (15.6%) cases, there was no report as to hardware management. Finally, our review revealed that there were no reported differences in outcomes between groups.

Conclusions

Management of CMF hardware infections should be performed in a sequential and consistent manner to optimize outcome. An evidence-based algorithm for management of CMF hardware infections based on this critical review of the literature is presented and discussed.

Bone Transport for Limb Reconstruction Following Severe Tibial Fractures

A common treatment of tibial defects especially after infections is bone transport via external fixation. We compare complications and outcomes of 25 patients treated with a typical Ilizarov frame or a hybrid system for bone reconstruction of the tibia. Average follow up was 5.1 years. Particular interest was paid to the following criteria: injury type, comorbidities, development of osteitis and outcome of the different therapies. The reason for segmental resection was a second or third grade open tibia fractures in 24 cases and in one case an infection after plate osteosynthesis. Average age of the patients was 41 years (range 19 to 65 years) and average defect size 6.6 cm (range 3.0 to 13.4 cm). After a mean time of 113 days 23 tibial defects were reconstructed, so we calculated an average healing index of 44.2 days/cm. Two patients with major comorbidities needed a below knee amputation. The presence of osteitis led to a more complicated course of therapy. In the follow up patients with an Ilizarov frame had better results than patients with hybrid systems. Bone transport using external fixation is suitable for larger defect reconstruction. With significant comorbidities, however, a primary amputation or other methods must be considered.

Can bone healing in distraction osteogenesis be accelerated by local application of IGF-1 and TGF-beta1?

Because complications of distraction osteogenesis are largely related to the long duration of therapy, increasing efforts were reached to shorten treatment by using osteoconductive replacement materials incorporating bioactive molecules such as IGF-1 and TGF-beta1. The controlled release of IGF-1 and TGF-beta1 from coated biodegradable poly(D,L-lactide) implants could stimulate fracture healing locally. We investigated the effect of locally applied IGF-1 and TGF-beta1 from IGF-1/TGF-beta1-enriched polylactide membranes on fracture healing in a sheep model of delayed callus formation. Twenty-eight sheep were used for this study. Callus distraction of 1 mm/day by means of a unilateral fixator was continued for 30 days. At the beginning of the subsequent consolidation phase, either growth factors were applied locally or the defect was packed with cancellous bone, or both. The groups treated with growth factors were compared to a control group. The consolidation phase lasted for 60 days and both tibiae were dissected for histological and histomorphometric analyses. This investigation found a reduced absolute callus area in the lengthening zone in all treatment groups. The two treatment groups that received a membrane coated with growth factors showed distinctly higher relative bone areas than the groups treated with an uncoated membrane or packing of the osteotomy defect with cancellous bone. The differences in bone areas were not statistically significant. Application of the growth factors accelerated bone healing and achieved results comparable with those of established treatment methods (packing with autologous cancellous bone). The best results were achieved with a combination of both methods.

[Pelvic stabilization in cases of septic instability. Triangular osteosynthesis in case of infection related vertical pelvic ring instability]

The combination of transiliac screws and lumbopelvic distraction osteosynthesis is usually an appropriate procedure to treat vertical pelvic ring instabilities under the condition of full weight bearing. In this case, due to the extent of septic destruction of the dorsal portion of the iliac bone, the common triangular fixation method using conventional pedicle screws was not possible. Using the transiliac dorsoventral screw position with special long screws, we achieved high mechanical triangular stability sufficient for pelvic ring fusion despite the large bony defect.