Refracture-related bone transport of tibia: technical notes and preliminary clinical results in nineteen cases

PURPOSE

Refracture is one of the main complications of bone transport, which brings additional physical and mental burden to surgeries and patients. We aimed to raise a new classification system of refracture-related bone transport based on the Simpson classification and to present our experience on treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 19 patients with refracture-related bone transport (average age of 37.7 years; 18 men). We developed a modified Simpson classification system to assist decision-making (conservative versus surgical). The ASAMI criteria were used to assess the outcomes at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 12.3 ± 3.2 months. Complete union was achieved in all patients, with no reinfection. Based on the modified Simpson classification, refracture was Ia type (within regeneration area) in three cases, Ib (collapsed fracture at the regeneration area) in one case, Ic (stress fracture) in three cases, II (at the junction between the regenerate and original bone) in one case, III (at the docking site) in nine cases, and V (at distant site) in two cases. Refracture was managed conservatively in six cases and surgically in 13 cases. Average time to bone union was 2.8 ± 1.2 months in the conservative group versus 4.4 ± 1.4 months in the surgery group. Assessment at the final follow-up using the ASAMI criteria revealed excellent bone result in all patients, excellent functional results in six patients (31.6%), and good functional results in 13 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Simpson classification could include refracture at the docking site and stress fracture in the regeneration zone and provide some guidance in determining the appropriate treatment strategy.

Treatment of tibial bone defects caused by infection: a retrospective comparative study of bone transport using a combined technique of unilateral external fixation over an intramedullary nail versus circular external fixation over an intramedullary nail

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the clinical efficacy of bone transport with either circular or unilateral external fixators over an intramedullary nail in the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by infection.

METHODS

Between May 2010 and January 2019, clinical and radiographic data were collected and analyzed for patients with bone defects caused by infection. Thirteen patients underwent bone transport using a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group A), while 12 patients were treated with a circular external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group B). The bone and functional outcomes of both groups were assessed and compared using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov criteria, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Paley classification.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were successfully treated with bone transport using external fixators over an intramedullary nail, with a mean follow-up time of 31.63 ± 5.88 months. There were no significant statistical differences in age, gender, previous surgery per patient, duration of infection, defect size, and follow-up time between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05). However, statistically significant differences were observed in operation time (187.13 ± 21.88 min vs. 255.76 ± 36.42 min, P = 0.002), intraoperative blood loss (39.26 ± 7.33 mL vs. 53.74 ± 10.69 mL, P < 0.001), external fixation time (2.02 ± 0.31 month vs. 2.57 ± 0.38 month, P = 0.045), external fixation index (0.27 ± 0.08 month/cm vs. 0.44 ± 0.09 month/cm, P = 0.042), and bone union time (8.37 ± 2.30 month vs. 9.07 ± 3.12, P = 0.032) between Group A and Group B. The excellent and good rate of bone and functional results were higher in Group A compared to Group B (76.9% vs. 75% and 84.6% vs. 58.3%). Statistically significant differences were observed in functional results (excellent/good/fair/poor, 5/6/2/0 vs. 2/5/4/1, P = 0.013) and complication per patient (0.38 vs. 1.16, P = 0.012) between Group A and Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone transport using a combined technique of external fixators over an intramedullary nail proved to be an effective method in treating tibial bone defects caused by infection. In comparison to circular external fixators, bone transport utilizing a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail resulted in less external fixation time, fewer complications, and better functional outcomes.

Semi-focal bone transport versus traditional bone transport technique for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma

How to deal with large tibial bone defects is still controversial. The purpose of this research was to compare the semi-focal bone transport (SFBT) technique with traditional bone transport (TBT) technique for treating such patients. Sixty-two patients were included and retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, after radical debridement large tibial bone defects remained. Patients were treated by the SFBT or TBT technique. The distraction, consolidation duration and complications were recorded by the patients' medical files. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated. The mean bone defect size was 7.7 ± 1.6 cm and 7.5 ± 2.1 cm for SFBT and TBT patients. The mean external fixation index (EFI) was 1.51 ± 0.14 months/cm and 1.89 ± 0.25 months/cm for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05), respectively. With respect to bone and function results, there was no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.1 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.7 for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05). Compared to the traditional bone transport technique, patients using the semi-focal bone transport technique achieved better clinical effects, including shorter EFI and less complications. Therefore, the SFBT technique could be a new option for patients with large tibial bone defects.

Critical size bone defects managed with modern techniques of bone transport: An update

Bone transport is one of several techniques that has been proven to be effective in addressing critical bone loss. While it was first described over 100 years ago, modifications to this technique coupled with advances in technology have allowed us to perform bone transport with higher success rates and reduced complication rates. Modern techniques of bone transport aim to shorten the duration of time an external fixator is utilized to reduce its associated complications and burden to patients. We present an update on modern techniques of bone transport for critical size defects and methods to shorten the external fixation time.

Induced membrane technique with plate fixation has a lower complication rate than bone transport over a plate for segmental tibial defects larger than 5 cm

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of segmental tibial bone defects remains a surgical challenge. While Bone Transport (BT) and Induced Membrane Technique (IMT) are effective strategies for regenerating bone, there are few comparative studies between them. This investigation undertakes a comparative analysis of BT and IMT for large segmental tibial defects stabilised through plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with segmental tibial defects exceeding 5 cm were prospectively enrolled from 2008 to 2021 in a single institution, with a minimum follow-up duration of two years. All patients underwent either BT or IMT with plate fixation of the tibia. Procedural success, primary union as well as bone and functional outcome scores were compared. Complications, including non-unions, joint contractures and deep infections requiring surgical intervention, were also compared.

RESULTS

41 patients were recruited in total. 28 patients underwent Bone Transport Over a Plate (BTOP), while 13 patients underwent IMT with Plate fixation (IMTP). The procedural success rate trended higher in IMTP compared to BTOP (100% vs. 85.7%). The primary union rate also trended higher in IMTP compared to BTOP (92.3% vs. 79.2%). BTOP and IMTP achieved similar rates of satisfactory bone outcome scores (78.6% vs. 84.6%) and functional outcome scores (75% vs. 76.5%). There was no statistical difference between procedural success, primary union, bone and functional outcome scores. The complication rate in BTOP was 78.6% (22 of 28), including five docking site or regenerate non-unions, eight deep infections and nine joint contractures. IMTP had a 38.5% (5 of 13) complication rate, including one non-union, two deep infections and two joint contractures. The complication rate was 2.04 times higher in BTOP compared to IMTP (p = 0.0117).

CONCLUSIONS

BTOP and IMTP are both equally effective techniques for regenerating bone in large tibial bone defects. However, IMTP may be a safer procedure than BTOP, with a lower probability of requiring additional procedures to address complications.

A unilateral external fixator combined with bone transport and tibio-talar fusion for the treatment of severe postoperative infection of peri-ankle fractures: retrospective analysis of 32 cases

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical effects of a unilateral external fixator combined with bone transport and tibio-talar fusion in the treatment of severe postoperative infection of peri-ankle fractures.

METHODS

The clinical data of 32 patients (22 men and 10 women) with severe postoperative infection of peri-ankle fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' age ranged from 26 to 62 (mean, 42 ± 9.5) years old. The types of fractures were distal tibia fracture (25 cases), distal tibia and fibula fracture (5 cases), and talus fracture (2 cases). All patients underwent treatment with unilateral external fixation combined with bone transport and tibio-talar fusion. 6 patients with severe infection received two-stage treatment involving focal debridement and external fixation, osteotomy, and bone transport. The remaining 26 patients underwent debridement, external fixation, and osteotomy simultaneously. The length of bone transport, total fixation time of the external fixator, and postoperative complications were recorded for all patients. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using the American Association of Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 16-36 months, with an average follow-up time of 24 months. The length of tibia bone transport ranged from 5 to 15 cm, with a mean length of 8.5 cm. The external fixator was applied for 12-24 months, with an average duration of 16 months. One patient suffered from refracture at tibio-talar fusion site, and one patient had external fixation pin-tract infection. No complications, such as recurrent infections (especially the MRSA infection), poor mineralization, refracture, iatrogenic nerve damage or fusion failure, were found in the remaining patients. The preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot function score was 40.0 ± 3.8 (range, 30-52) points, and it increased to 75.0 ± 3.0 (range, 67-78) points at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A unilateral external fixator combined with bone transport and tibio-talar fusion is an effective method for treating severe postoperative infection of peri-ankle fractures. This approach is capable of reconstructing large bone defects that remain after clearing the infected lesion. Additionally, it provides stability to the ankle, enhances ankle-hindfoot function, and improves the patient's quality of life.

Docking site interventions following bone transport using external fixation: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Although bone transport is a well-recognised technique to address segmental bone defects, optimal management of docking sites is not absolutely determined. Some surgeons routinely intervene in all cases, and others prefer to observe and intervene only if spontaneous union does not occur. Primary aim of the study was to compare rates of docking site union between patients who underwent routine docking site intervention and those who did not.

METHODS

A systematic literature review using the keywords "bone transport", "docking", "tibia", and "femur" was performed in PubMed using PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English from January 2000 to August 2022 were included and assessed independently by two reviewers. Pooled analysis was undertaken dividing patients into two groups: those managed by routine intervention and those initially observed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three clinical studies met the eligibility criteria for pooled analysis, including 1153 patients, 407 in the routine intervention and 746 in the observed group. The rate of union after initial treatment was 90% in the routine intervention group and 66% in the observed group (p < 0.0001). Overall union rates at the end of treatment were similar at 99% in both groups. Patients in the observed group required an average of 2.2 procedures to achieve union overall compared with 3.8 in the routine intervention group. Time in frame was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current literature, routine docking site interventions cannot be recommended, since this may lead to unnecessary interventions in two thirds of patients. Timely selective intervention in those at high risk or after a defined period of observation would appear to be a logical approach.

Advances in the Application of Bone Transport Techniques in the Treatment of Bone Nonunion and Bone Defects

Bone nonunion and bone defects frequently occur following high-energy open injuries or debridement surgeries, presenting complex challenges to treatment and significantly affecting patients' quality of life. At present, there are three primary treatment options available for addressing bone nonunion and bone defects: vascularized bone grafts, the Masquelet technique, and the Ilizarov technique. The Ilizarov technique, also known as distraction osteogenesis, is widely favored by orthopedic surgeons because of several advantages, including minimal soft tissue requirements, low infection risk, and short consolidation time. However, in recent years, the application of the Masquelet technique has resulted in novel treatment methods for managing post-traumatic bone infections when bone defects are present. Although these new techniques do not constitute a panacea, they continue to be the most commonly employed options for treating complex large bone nonunion and bone defects. This review evaluates the currently available research on the Ilizarov and Masquelet bone transport techniques applied at various anatomical sites. Additionally, it explores treatment durations and associated complications to establish a theoretical foundation that can guide clinical treatment decisions and surgical procedures for the management of bone nonunion and bone defects.

Surgical treatment of critical size bone defects with Masquelet technique versus bone transport: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

To date, the management of critical-sized bone defects lacks a universally accepted approach among orthopedic surgeons. Currently, the main options to treat severe bone loss include autologous grafting, free vascularized bone transfer, bone transport and induced-membrane technique. The purpose of this study is to critically compare the outcomes of Masquelet technique and bone transport to provide a higher level of evidence regarding the indexed techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic search on several databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. English-written reports comparing outcomes of the Masquelet technique versus the bone transport technique in patients with critical-sized defects in lower extremities were included.

RESULTS

Six observational studies involving 364 patients were included. The systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data showed no significant difference in most outcomes, except for ASAMI bone outcomes and residual deformity, which showed better results in the bone transport group. The 64% of patients treated with Masquelet technique obtained excellent/good bone ASAMI results compared to 82.8% with bone transport (p = 0.01). Post-operative residual deformity was 1.9% with the bone transport method versus 9.7% with the Masquelet technique (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Masquelet technique and bone transport showed comparable results for the management of critical-sized bone defects of the lower limb. However, these findings must be carefully interpreted due to the high risk of bias. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are necessary to better clarify the strengths and limitations of these two techniques and to identify the variables affecting the outcomes.

Docking site complications analysis of Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects

BACKGROUND

Treating long bone defects of the extremities caused by trauma, infection, tumours, and nonunion has been challenging for clinical orthopaedic surgeons. Bone transport techniques have the potential to treat bone defects. However, inevitable docking site complications related to bone transport techniques have been reported in many studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with docking site complications in patients who underwent the Ilizarov bone transport technique for the treatment of tibial bone defects.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 103 patients who underwent bone transport for the treatment of large bone defects in the tibia from October 2012 to October 2019. Patient demographic data, complications and clinical outcomes after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were collected and retrospectively analysed. Additionally, univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to analyse the factors that may affect the development of docking site complications in patients with tibial bone defects treated with the Ilizarov bone transport technique. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of the Ilizarov criteria (ASAMI) at the last clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

All 103 patients with an average follow-up of 27.5 months. The docking site complications rate per patient was 0.53, and delayed union occurred in 22 cases (21.4%), axial deviation occurred in 19 cases (18.4%) and soft tissue incarceration occurred in 10 cases (9.7%). According to the results of the logistic regression analysis, the bone defect length (P = 0.001, OR = 1.976), and bone defect of distal 1/3 (P = 0.01, OR = 1.976) were significantly correlated with delayed union. Bone defect length (P < 0.001, OR = 1.981) and external fixation time (P = 0.012, OR = 1.017) were significantly correlated with axial deviation. Soft tissue defects (P = 0.047, OR = 6.766) and the number of previous operations (P = 0.001, OR = 2.920) were significantly correlated with soft tissue incarceration. The ASAMI bone score at the last follow-up showed a rate of excellent and good bone results of 95.1% and a rate of excellent functional results of 90.3%.

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov bone transport technique is a practical and effective method for the treatment of tibial bone defects. However, the incidence of complications at the docking site is high, of which bone defect length, external fixation time, the number of previous operations, soft tissue defects and the bone defect of distal 1/3 are statistically significantly associated with the occurrence of docking site complications.

Complications analysis of Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects-a retrospective study of 199 cases

BACKGROUND

The clinical treatment of long bone defets in the extremities caused by trauma, infection, tumours, and nonunion has been a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Bone transport techniques have become the only way to treat such bone defects. However, inevitable difficulties and complications related to bone transport techniques have been reported in many studies.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for complications and the effectiveness of the Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defects.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 199 patients who underwent treatment with the Ilizarov bone transport technique at our institution from May 2012 to September 2019. Patient demographic data, complications and clinical outcomes after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were collected and retrospectively analysed. Additionally, a risk factor analysis was performed for the top three major complications. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria at the last clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients underwent follow-up for 12-40 months, with an average of 23.5 months, and all achieved bone healing. A total of 310 complications occurred, with an average of 1.04 minor complications and 0.48 major complications per patient. The top three complications were pin tract infection in 48 cases (61.3%), axial deviation in 86 cases (43.2%), and delayed union in 50 cases (25.13%). Multivariate analysis showed that the bone defect length (P = 0.02, OR = 5.489), the number of previous surgeries (P = 0.003, OR = 2.204), and the external fixation index (P = 0.01, OR = 1.202) were significantly correlated with pin tract infection. Bone defects of the middle 1/3 (P < 0.001, OR = 23.769), the bone defect length (P < 0.001, OR = 2.776), and the external fixation index (P < 0.001, OR = 1.154) were significantly correlated with axial deviation. The bone defect length (P = 0.003, OR = 1.242), soft tissue defects (P = 0.013, OR = 0.312) and bone defects of the distal 1/3 (P = 0.023, OR = 4.257) were significantly correlated with delayed healing. The ASAMI bone score at the last follow-up showed a rate of excellent and good bone results of 95.48% and a rate of excellent functional results of 87.94%.

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov bone transfer technique is an effective method for treating tibial bone defects, and shortening the treatment period can reduce the incidence of complications. Older patients and those with longer bone defects, a higher external fixation index, more previous operations, and defects of the middle and distal 1/3 had a higher incidence of complications.

Preliminary Outcomes of a Staged Percutaneous Retrograde Prefabricated Gentamicin-coated Intramedullary Nail to Manage Complications after Ankle Fusion through Tibial Bone Transport

Aim

Distal tibial injuries combining bone loss, articular destruction and infection can be treated through distraction osteogenesis combined with ankle fusion. Bone transport is not without complications. This study investigates our preliminary results using a retrograde prefabricated gentamicin-coated nail (ETN PROtect®) to treat complications after infected bone defects of the distal tibial were managed by ankle arthrodesis and distraction osteogenesis.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective case series study. All consecutive patients with bone transport complications after ankle arthrodesis and distraction osteogenesis who were subsequently operated on using a retrograde ETN PROtect® nail were analysed. The cases occurred between 2017 and 2020. The primary objective was to report on the resolution of the clinical problem and the risk of deep infection after nail implantation.

Results

Five patients have included: two docking site non-unions, two regenerated bone fractures and one hypotrophic regenerated bone. These complications were resolved in all patients (5/5, 100%). A painless, stable and plantigrade ankle arthrodesis was achieved in all cases. No patient developed a local infection or required nail removal (mean follow-up: 35.2 months). The mean LEFS score was 46.8 ± 13.8 and the mean knee ROM was 112 ± 12.7°. All patients tolerated full weight-bearing. All patients were very satisfied with the procedure (mean SAPS score was 93.8 points).

Conclusion

The staged retrograde nailing technique using the ETN PROtect® nail may represent an effective and safe treatment for bone transport complications in high-infection-risk patients. Furthermore, the technique allows simultaneous achievement of ankle arthrodesis. The patients had good functional outcomes and were satisfied with the procedure.

Clinical significance

This strategy of using retrograde gentamicin-coated tibial nails offers a solution to resolve bone transport complications while simultaneously achieving functional ankle arthrodesis.

How to cite this article

Pujol O, Vicente M, Castellanos S, et al. Preliminary Outcomes of a Staged Percutaneous Retrograde Prefabricated Gentamicin-coated Intramedullary Nail to Manage Complications after Ankle Fusion through Tibial Bone Transport. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(3):155-162.

The use of 3D printing technology in limb reconstruction. Inspirations and challenges

The management of septic non-unions with associated bone necrosis is challenging, especially when the resulting bone defect after the debridement is extensile. Different techniques have been described in the literature for the treatment of these demanding cases, with the most prominent being free vascularized Fibular graft and bone transport with distraction osteogenesis principles. Recently, 3D printing technology has been increasingly utilized in many complex orthopaedic pathologies. However, the application of those advancements regarding septic non-unions with residual bone defect has not been previously studied. This study presents a novel 3D printing technique for the management of an infected critical bone deficit of the tibia. Queries, challenges and future perspectives concerning the recruiting of 3D printing technology in limb reconstruction are also being discussed. Clinical Evidence Level: IV.

Complications associated with single-level bone transport for the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of single-level bone transport with a unilateral external fixator for treatment of proximal, intermediate and distal tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection (FRI) and compare their complications.

METHODS

The clinical records and consecutive X-ray photographs of patients with tibial bone defects treated by single-level bone transport using a unilateral external fixator (Orthofix Limb Reconstruction System) were analyzed retrospectively, from January 2012 to December 2018. Patients were divided into the proximal group (P, n = 19), intermediate group (I, n = 25), and distal group (D, n = 18) according to the location of the tibial bone defect. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard was applied to assess the bone and functional outcomes and postoperative complications evaluated by the Paley classification.

RESULTS

A total of 62 participants were included in this study, with a median age of 36 ± 7.14 years. Sixty patients with tibial bone defects caused by FRI were successfully treated by single-level bone transport using a unilateral external fixator, with a mean bone union time (BUT) of 7.3 ± 1.71 months. According to the ASAMI criteria, there were statistical differences in bone and function results between the three groups (P vs. I vs. D, P < 0.001). The excellent and good rate of bone result in the intermediate group was higher than the other (P vs. I vs. D, 73.6% vs. 84% vs. 66.7%), and the excellent and good rate of function result in the proximal group was the highest (P vs. I vs. D, 84.2% vs. 80% vs. 73.3%). Complications were observed in 29 out of 62 patients (46.7%), with pin tract infection being the most common (14.8%), followed by axial deviation (14.8%), muscle contractures (12.7%), joint stiffness (12.7%), and soft tissue incarceration (12.7%). Other complications included delayed consolidation (12.7%), delayed union (6.3%), nonunion (4.2%), and neurological injury (8.5%). Two patients (3.2%) required below-knee amputation due to uncontrollable infection and previous surgery failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pin tract infection was the most common complication in tibial bone transport using an external fixator. Complications of distal tibial bone transport are more severe and occur at a higher rate than in other parts. Axial deviation mostly occurred in the intermediate tibial bone transport.

Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series

Aim

Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated.

Results

The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence.

Conclusion

The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union.

How to cite this article

Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117-122.

A modified hybrid transport technique combined with a retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nail for the management of distal tibial periarticular osteomyelitis and associated defects

BACKGROUND

This paper aimed to propose a modified technique of bone transport. An annular frame combined with a retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nail was used in this novel technique for treating large distal tibial periarticular osteomyelitis and associated defects.

METHODS

Our team conducted a retrospective research. Forty-three patients with large distal tibial periarticular bone loss were involved in this study. Sixteen patients were treated using the modified hybrid transport technique (MHT group) while 27 were subjected to traditional bone transport (BT group). The mean bone loss was 7.8 ± 2.4 cm in the MHT group and 7.6 ± 2.6 cm in the BT group. The external fixation index, time in transport frame, self-rating anxiety scale, bone healing results and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean time in frame for the MHT group was 3.6 ± 1.5 months, while that of the BT group was 10.3 ± 2.7 months (p < 0.05). The mean external fixation index of MHT group was 0.46 ± 0.08 months/cm versus 1.38 ± 0.24 months/cm of the BT group (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference for the bone healing results between the MHT and BT groups (p = 0.856). The self-rating anxiety scale and total complication incidence of the MHT group were significantly lower than that of BT patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the traditional BT technique, our modified hybrid transport technique showed better clinical outcomes for treating large distal tibial periarticular bone loss, including less time in transport frame, lower external fixation index and complication incidence. Therefore, this modified technique should be further promoted and developed.

Management of bone loss in acute severe open tibial fractures: a retrospective study of twenty nine cases-a treatment strategy with bone length preservation

PURPOSE

The present study investigated the outcomes of bone loss associated with acute open tibial fractures classified as Gustilo-Anderson classification grade III B (GIIIB) using a bone length preservation strategy.

METHODS

Among acute GIIIB open tibial fractures, 29 limbs of 29 patients requiring bone loss treatment were included. The reconstruction methods for bone loss were selected among the Masquelet technique (MT), bone transport (BT), acute shortening followed by gradual lengthening (ASGL), and free vascularized fibula graft (FVFG). Primary outcome measures were the rate of bone union and time to bone union.

RESULTS

The median radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG) was 46.75 mm. Bone loss was treated with ASGL only in two patients in whom it was not possible to cover large soft tissue defects by a single free latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap (with the serratus anterior (SA) muscle). The other 27 patients underwent soft tissue reconstruction and bone loss treatment with the preservation of bone length, including the MT for 23, BT for six, and FVFG for one. The bone union rate was 75.9%, and the median time to bone union was six months. Salvage surgeries were performed on all seven patients with nonunion; all of whom eventually achieved bony union.

CONCLUSION

Bone loss associated with acute GIIIB open tibial fractures were treated with "bone length preservation" if the size of the soft tissue defect was less than the size that was covered by a single LD myocutaneous flap (with the SA muscle).

Acute shortening and double-level lengthening versus bone transport for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present our experience with a new modified Ilizarov technique of acute shortening and double-level lengthening (ASDL) for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection and compare it with bone transport (BT).

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was performed on 47 patients with large tibial defects after trauma and infection from June 2014 to June 2018. Depending on different Ilizarov methods, these patients were divided into ASDL group (n = 21) and BT group (n = 26). The difference in bone lengthening time, time in frame, external fixation index, docking site healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Bone and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Complications encountered in both groups were categorized according to the classification of Paley, including problems (treated nonoperatively), obstacles (treated operatively), and sequelae (unresolved at last).

RESULTS

All patients were followed for at least two years since the lengthening frame was removed. All cases achieved complete union at the docking site and consolidation of the regenerate callus. The mean bone loss was 8.9 cm (range 6.5-16.0 cm) in ASDL group vs. 10.3 cm (range 5.2-18.5 cm) in BT group. The mean bone lengthening time was 2.4 ± 0.7 months in ASDL group vs. 4.1 ± 1.4 months in BT group (p<0.001); time in frame was 9.1 months (range 7.0-14.5 months) in ASDL group vs. 17.7 months (range 13.5-23.0 months) in BT group (p<0.001); and external fixation index was 1.04 months/cm (range 0.83-1.38 months/cm) in ASDL group vs. 1.91 months/cm (range 1.28-2.70 months/cm) in BT group (p<0.001). The incidence of obstacles occurred in ASDL group was significantly lower than that in BT group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the bone (p = 0.635) and functional results (p = 0.293) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with bone transport, our modified technique of acute shortening and double-level lengthening could reduce bone lengthening time, time in frame, external fixation index and postoperative complications. It showed better clinical effects in patients with large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection.

Bifocal versus trifocal bone transport for the management of tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of bifocal bone transport (BFT) and trifocal bone transport (TFT) for the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection (FRI).

METHODS

The literature searches of Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar databases, PubMed/Medline, and Web of Science for literature published up to September 20, 2022, were performed. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the MINORS scale. Patients were divided into the BFT group and the TFT group, depending on the site of the osteotomy. The demographic data, defect size (DS), external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), bone and functional results, complications, and autologous bone grafting (ABG) were extracted and analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.3).

RESULTS

Five studies included 484 patients with tibial bone defects treated by bone transport investigated in this meta-analysis, with a mean bone defect of 9.3 cm. There were statistical differences in DS (MD =  - 2.38, 95% CI - 3.45 to - 1.32, P < 0.0001), EFT (MD = 103.44, 95% CI 60.11 to 146.77, P < 0.00001), and EFI (MD = 26.02, 95% CI 14.38 to 37.65, P < 0.00001) between BFT group and TFT group. There was no statistical difference in bone results (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06, P = 0.67), functional results (RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07, P = 0.37), complications (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.59 to 4.14, P = 0.36), and ABG (RR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.84, P = 0.42) between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TFT was a feasible and practical method in the treatment of massive tibial bone defects caused by FRI to receive shorter EFT and satisfactory bone and functional results.

A retrospective analysis of the definitive management of open talus fractures at a major trauma centre, comparing ORIF to FUSION: cohort study and audit of BOAST 4 guidelines

PURPOSE

Open talus fractures are notoriously difficult to manage, and they are commonly associated with a high level of complications including non-union, avascular necrosis and infection. Currently, the management of such injuries is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, and thus, definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. The key principles of open talus fracture management which do not vary between surgeons are early debridement, orthoplastic wound care, anatomic reduction and definitive fixation whenever possible. However, there is much debate over whether the talus should be preserved or removed after open talus fracture/dislocation and proceeded to tibiocalcaneal fusion.

METHODS

A review of electronic hospital records for open talus fractures from 2014 to 2021 returned fourteen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, and five cases were definitively managed with FUSION, while the others were managed with alternative methods. We collected patient's age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. The average follow-up of the cohort was 4 years and one month. EQ-5D-5L and FAAM-ADL/Sports score was used as a patient reported outcome measure. Data were analysed using the software PRISM.

RESULTS

Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group.

CONCLUSION

FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there is a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate and quality of life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients.

Three-stage limb salvage in tibial fracture related infection with composite bone and soft-tissue defect

INTRODUCTION

Managing critical-sized tibial defects is one of the most complex challenges orthopedic surgeons face. This is even more problematic in the presence of infection and soft-tissue loss. The purpose of this study is to describe a comprehensive three-stage surgical protocol for the reconstruction of infected tibial injuries with combined bone defects and soft-tissue loss, and report the clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study at a specialized limb reconstruction center identified all patients with infected tibial injuries with bone and soft-tissue loss from 2010 through 2018. Thirty-one patients were included. All cases were treated using a three-stage protocol: (1) infected limb damage control; (2) soft-tissue coverage with a vascularized or local flap; (3) definitive bone reconstruction using distraction osteogenesis principles with external fixation.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

limb salvage rate and infection eradication.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

patient functional outcomes and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Patients in this series of chronically infected tibias had been operated upon 3.4 times on average before starting our limb salvage protocol. The mean soft-tissue and bone defect sizes were 124 cm2 (6-600) and 5.4 cm (1-23), respectively. A free flap was performed in 67.7% (21/31) of the cases; bone transport was the selected bone-reconstructive option in 51.7% (15/31). Local flap failure rate was 30% (3/10), with 9.5% for free flaps (2/21). Limb salvage rate was 93.5% (29/31), with infection eradicated in all salvaged limbs. ASAMI bone score: 100% good/excellent. Mean VAS score was 1.0, and ASAMI functional score was good/excellent in 86% of cases. Return-to-work rate was 83%; 86% were "very satisfied" with the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

A three-stage surgical approach to treat chronically infected tibial injuries with combined bone and soft-tissue defects yields high rates of infection eradication and successful limb salvage, with favorable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.

[Comparative study of monolateral and circular fixator in the treatment of infectious tibial nonunion]

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment effect of monolateral and circular external fixator in infectious tibial nonunion and to explore external fixation structure with better osteogenic ability and fewer complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 150 patients with infectious tibial nonunion admitted from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into monolateral fixator group and circular fixator group according to the type of external fixation. Demographic and perioperative data of the two groups were collected. New bone quality was assessed by pixels ratio, treatment effect was assessed by complications. Notes for treatment was explored by case analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients with infectious mid-tibial nonunion were included, 26 in monolateral fixator group and 38 in circular fixator group. There was no difference in demographic data between two groups. The pixel ratio of new bone between two groups was from 0.91 to 0.97 with an average of (0.94±0.03), and from 0.93 to 0.97 with an average of(0.95±0.02), respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The external fixation index was from 34.1 to 50.6 with an average of (42.3±8.3) days /cm in monolateral fixator group and from 44.5 to 56.1 with an average of (45.8±10.3) days/cm in the circular fixator group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were 7 cases (26.9%) of complications in monolateral fixator group and 5 cases (13.2%) in circular fixator group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), but 5 cases of foot ptosis in monolateral fixator group and none in circular fixator group. The time of weight bearing in monolateral fixator group was later than that in circular fixator group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Monolateral and circular fixators can achieve equivalent bone formation in the treatment of infected tibial nonunion. Circular fixator is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis or concomitant medical diseases requiring early weight bearing. Hydroxyapatite coated screws are recommended if a monolateral external fixator is selected when the expected enlarged length is long and the fixation time is long and close monitoring of the ankle movement is required to avoid foot droop.

[Clinical therapeutic strategies of refracture after bone transport for tibial bone defect]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical therapeutic strategies of refracture after Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of tibial bone defect.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 19 patients with infected tibial bone defect treated by Ilizarov bone transport technique and then refracture from August 2010 to January 2020, including 18 males and 1 female with an average age of (37.7±13.0) years old ranging from 15 to 66 years old. Cause of injury invlved falling injury in 4 cases, crashing injury 1 case, crushing injury in 1 case and without obvious injury history in 13 cases. The ipsilateral distal femoral fracture in 2 cases occurred before the external fixator of tibia was removed, and the other 17 cases had a minimum of 1 day and a maximum of 30 months after the external fixator had been removed. The site of refracture was at regenerative zone in 8 cases, at docking site in 9 cases, at ipsilateral femoral shaft in 2 cases. According to the modified Simpson classification proposed by the author, the refracture was classified. The treatment of refracture include plaster splint, traction or external fixation. Bone healing and function were evaluated according to the standards of the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov(ASAMI).

RESULTS

All patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 9 to 17 months with an average of (12.3±3.2) months. According to the modified Simpson classification, there were 3 cases of type Ⅰa, 1 case of type Ⅰb, 3 cases of type Ⅰc, 1 case of type Ⅱ, 9 cases of type Ⅲ and 2 cases of type Ⅴ. All the refractures healed without infection or malunion. The fracture healing time of conservative treatment for 6 cases were 3, 5, 3, 2, 2, 2 months fespectively;and the healing time of fracture treated by surgery for 13 cases was 2 to 6 months, with an average of(4.4±1.4) months. According to ASAMI evaluation criteria, bony results showed all patients obtained excellent results, and functional results showed 6 patients got excellent results, 13 good beacause of ankle or knee stiffness.

CONCLUSION

The modified Simpson classification could contain most clinical types of refracture after bone transport, and the external fixation is a simple and effective method for refracture.

Treatment of a tibial bone defect with a motorized intramedullary bone transport nail: A case review with 32 months follow up

Nowadays, massive segmental bone defects represent a surgical challenge for trauma surgeons. Most of these injuries appear in the context of high-energy trauma, not only significantly affecting the bones, but also involving severe injuries of the adjacent soft tissues. For these reasons, their treatment requires complex reconstruction surgeries.

There are multiple techniques to treat bone defects, bone transport being one of the most widely used. Historically, external fixators (monolateral and circular) have been and still are the gold standard for performing this technique, although they are not exempt from complications. By means of specific intramedullary nails for bone transport, it is possible to minimize the complications of external fixation, allowing large tibial bone defects to be treated through distraction osteogenesis (all-internal system), which is favoured by early weight bearing.

Risk factors of transport gap bending deformity in the treatment of critical-size bone defect after bone transport

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors of transport gap bending deformity (TGBD) in the treatment of critical-size bone defect (CSBD) after the removal of the external fixator.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2019, 178 patients with bone defects of the lower extremity caused by infection were treated by bone transport using a unilateral external fixator in our medical institution. TGBD was defined as the bone callus in the distraction area with a deviation to the force line of the femur (> 10°) or tibia (> 12°) after removal of the external fixator. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard was applied to assess the bone and functional outcomes. After the data were significant by the T-test or Pearson’s Chi-square test was analyzed, odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression tests to describe factors associated with the diagnosis of TGBD.

Results

A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 28.6 ± 3.82 months. The positive result of the bacteria isolated test was observed in 144 cases (80.9%). The rate of excellent and good in the bone outcomes (excellent/good/fair/poor/failure, 41/108/15/14/0) was 83.7%, and 92.3% in the functional results (excellent/good/fair/poor/failure, 50/98/16/14/0) according to the ASAMI criteria. TGBD after removal of external fixator occurred in twenty-two patients (12.3%), including 6 tibias, and 16 femurs. Age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m², femoral defect, diabetes, osteoporosis, glucocorticoid intake, duration of infection > 24 months, EFT > 9 months, EFI > 1.8 month/cm were associated significantly with a higher incidence of TGBD in the binary logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05). The incidence more than 50% was found in patients with femoral defect (76.1%), osteoporosis (72.7%), BMI > 25 kg/m² (69.0%), diabetes (59.5%), glucocorticoid intake (54.7%). In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the following factors were associated independently with TGBD, including age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m², femoral defect, diabetes, and osteoporosis.

Conclusions

Bone transport using a unilateral external fixator was a safe and practical method in the treatment of CSBD caused by infection. The top five risk factors of TGBD included femoral defect, BMI > 25 kg/m², duration of bone infection > 24 months, age > 45 years, and diabetes. Age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m², femoral defect, osteoporosis, and diabetes were the independent risk factors. The higher incidence of TGBD may be associated with more risk factors.

Tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique in the treatment of distal tibial defect-preliminary outcomes of 12 cases and a description of the surgical technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the preliminary outcomes of tetrafocal (three osteotomies) and pentafocal (four osteotomies) bone transport using Ilizarov technique for the treatment of distal tibial defect and describe the surgical technique.

METHODS

A total of 12 eligible patients with distal tibial defect > 6 cm caused by direct trauma or posttraumatic osteomyelitis who were admitted to our institution from January 2017 to January 2019 were treated by tetrafocal or pentafocal bone transport using Ilizarov technique. Detailed demographic data, including age, sex, etiology, defect size, number of osteotomies (three or four), external fixation time (EFT) and external fixation index (EFI), were collected, and the bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system. Complications during the surgery and the follow-up period were recorded and evaluated by the Paley classification at a minimum follow-up of two years after removal of the fixator.

RESULTS

There were 9 men and 3 women with an average age of 37.4±7.8 years. The etiology included posttraumatic osteomyelitis in 8 cases and posttraumatic bone loss in 4 cases. The mean bone defect after radical debridement was 7.1±0.6 cm. Tetrafocal bone transport was applied in 9 cases, and pentafocal bone transport was applied in 3 cases. The average EFT and EFI were 5.2±0.8 months and 0.7±0.2 months/cm, respectively. The average time of follow-up after removal of the external fixator was 28.5±3.3 months without recurrence of osteomyelitis. The bone results were good in 7 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case, and the functional results were good in 5 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 1 case. The most common complication was pin tract infection, which occurred in all cases, but there were no major complications, such as nerve or vascular injury.

CONCLUSION

Tetrafocal and pentafocal bone transport using Ilizarov technique could be an alternative treatment option in selected cases with distal tibial defect > 6 cm. It could shorten the distraction period, fasten regeneration, and reduce the associated complications.

Prospective randomized comparison of bone transport versus Masquelet technique in infected gap nonunion of tibia

AIM

The present prospective randomized study compared the bone transport technique (BT) and Masquelet technique (MT) in the treatment of infected gap non-union of the tibia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Total 25 patients with infected gap non-union of the tibia with bone gap upto 6 cm were randomised into BT group (group I, 13 patients) and MT (group II, 12 patients). The mean age was 31.77 years in group I and 39.67 years in group II. The mean intra-operative bone gap was 3.92 cm in group I and 3.79 cm in group II. Monolateral fixator was applied in nine patients each in both groups, while four and three fractures were stabilized with ring fixators in group I and II, respectively. Mean follow-up was 31.62 months and 30.42 months in group I and II, respectively. Bone and functional results were compared using the association for the study and application of the method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria.

RESULTS

The average fixator period was 9.42 and 16.33 months in group I and II, respectively (p < 0.001). Union was achieved in 12 (92%) patients and 6 (50%) patients in group I and II, respectively. The functional results were excellent (eight and two), good (four and six), fair (zero and three) and poor (one and one) in group I and II respectively, (p 0.23). The Bone results were excellent, good and poor in nine, three and one patients in group I, and three, three and six patients in group II respectively, (p 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

The functional and bone results were comparable but more reliable in bone transport than the Masquelet technique. The fixator duration and incidence of non-union were higher in MT group. Ilizarov bone transport technique should be preferred in infected non-union of the tibia with bone loss upto 6 cm.

Masquelet-Ilizarov technique for the management of bone loss post debridement of infected tibial nonunion

PURPOSE

Masquelet and Ilizarov techniques have their advantages and shortcomings in the reconstruction of bone defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of both techniques for the management of infected tibial nonunion to combine the advantages of both techniques with avoidance of shortcomings of both of them.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective single-centre study was performed during the period from 2012 to 2019. Patients with the infected nonunion of the tibia with bone defect were included. Patients with pathological fractures or non-infected bone loss were excluded. Management protocol for all patients consisted of two stages. The first stage was Masquelet induced membrane technique and the second stage was Ilizarov bone transport. The results were assessed based on both objective (clinical and radiographic evaluation) and subjective criteria (limb function and patient satisfaction).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The mean size of the defect was 6 cm. Ilizarov bone transport was done through the induced membrane chamber in all cases with an average follow-up of 28 months. Successful reconstruction without recurrence of infection was achieved in 30 cases (94%). No other bone or soft tissue procedure was needed with satisfactory functional outcome in 27 out of 30 cases (90%). Three cases had unsatisfactory results due to leg length discrepancy, joint stiffness, and persistent pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Masquelet-Ilizarov technique can be used for the management of infected nonunion tibia with high satisfactory results without the need for complex soft tissue procedures.

Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with femoral and tibial critical-sized bone defect (CSBD) treated by trifocal bone transport using the Ilizarov method.

METHODS

From March 2011 and January 2017, clinical and radiographic data of patients with CSBD (> 6 cm) caused by infection were documented and analyzed. Patients were divided into the femur group (n = 18) and tibia groups (n = 21) according to the location of bone transport. The bone and functional outcomes were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov (ASAMI) criterion, and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients were managed by the trifocal bone transport for the femur (n = 18) or tibia (n = 21) bone defects with a mean follow-up time of 26.1 months (range 17-34 months). Eighteen femurs and 21 tibias with a mean distraction regenerate length (DRL) of 8.3 cm (range 6-13 cm) and 7.5 cm (range 6-11 cm) respectively. Infection was eradicated in all patients, and the total bone union was received in all cases (100%). Statistical difference of bone grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/11/3/1 vs 2/13/4/2, P < 0.05), and function grade (excellent/good/fair/poor, 3/14/1/0 vs 4/13/3/1, P < 0.05) were respectively observed between the femur group and tibia group. The excellent and good rate of bone (femur vs tibia, 77.8% vs 71.4%), and function grade (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 80.9%) was higher in the femur group than the tibia. The rate of complication in the femur group was lower than in the tibia (femur vs tibia, 94.4% vs 76.2%). One femur and five tibias were performed additional surgery for delayed union and axial deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

The trifocal bone transport using the unilateral external fixator was a practical method in the management of CSBD in the lower extremity. The BUT and EFI of the femur group were shorter than the tibia. Although the complications noted were more frequent on the femur, these were mostly minor.

Novel approach to estimate distraction forces in distraction osteogenesis and application in the human lower leg

PURPOSE

In distraction osteogenesis (DO) of long bones, new bone tissue is distracted to lengthen limbs or reconstruct bone defects. However, mechanical boundary conditions in human application such as arising forces are mainly based on limited empirical data. Our aim was the numerical determination of the callus distraction force (CDF) and the total distraction force (TDF) during DO in the tibia of adults to advance the understanding of callus tissue behavior and optimize DO procedures.

METHOD

We implemented a mathematical model based on an animal experiment to enable the calculation of forces arising while distracting callus tissue, excluding the influence of surrounding soft tissue (muscles, skin etc.). The CDF progression for the distraction period was calculated using the implemented model and varying distraction parameters (initial gap, area, step size, time interval, length). Further, we estimated the CDF based on reported forces in humans and compared the results to our model predictions. In addition, we calculated the TDF based on our CDF predictions in combination with reported resisting forces due to soft tissue presence in human cadavers. Finally, we compared the progressions to in vivo TDF measurements for validation.

RESULTS

Due to relaxation, a peak and resting CDF is observable for each distraction step. Our biomechanical results show a non-linear degressive increase of the resting and peak CDF at the beginning and a steady non-linear increase thereafter. The calculated resting and peak CDF in the tibial metaphysis ranged from 0.00075 to 0.0089 N and 0.22-2.6 N at the beginning as well as 20-25 N and 70-75 N at the end of distraction. The comparison to in vivo data showed the plausibility of our predictions and resulted in a 10-33% and 10-23% share of resting CDF in the total resting force for bone transport and elongation, respectively. Further, the percentage of peak CDF in total peak force was found to be 29-58% and 27-55% for bone transport and elongation, respectively. Moreover, our TDF predictions were valid based on the comparison to in vivo forces and resulted in a degressive increase from 6 to 125 N for the peak TDF and from 5 to 76 N for the resting TDF.

CONCLUSION

Our approach enables the estimation of forces arising due to the distraction of callus tissue in humans and results in plausible force progressions as well as absolute force values for the callus distraction force during DO. In combination with measurements of resisting forces due to the presence of soft tissue, the total distraction force in DO may also be evaluated. We thus propose the application of this method to approximate the behavior of mechanical callus properties during DO in humans as an alternative to in vivo measurements.

Bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation versus simple bone transport in the treatment of large bone defects of lower limbs after trauma

Background

Bone transport has been successfully applied for the management of large segmental bone defects. However, its main shortcoming is the long-lasting consolidation period, which may cause lots of related complications. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of this modified technique with simple bone transport in the treatment of large segmental bone defects of lower limbs after trauma.

Methods

Eighty-four patients with large segmental bone defects treated in our institution from January 2014 to January 2017 were selected for retrospective study. A total of 77 cases were completely followed. Among them, 35 patients were treated by bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique (Group A), and 42 by simple bone transport technique (Group B). Patients with open injuries were classified according to Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification. The general data of Group A and B were compared. The time in external fixator, total cure time and operation times of two groups were recorded. Ennecking score was used to evaluate the recovery of limb functions while self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) for the postoperative anxiety evaluation. In addition, the total complication incidence was compared between Group A and B.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic data between Group A and B (p > 0.05). The time in external fixator of Group A and B was (4.8 ± 1.6) and (18.2 ± 3.9) months, respectively (p < 0.05). The total cure time was (17.6 ± 2.2) and (20.4 ± 2.8) months in Group A and B (p < 0.05). The number of operations in Group A and B was (4.9 ± 1.2) and (4.8 ± 1.0) (p > 0.05). Ennecking score of Group A and B was 84.7 and 75.7% (p < 0.05). SAS score and total complication incidence in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical effects of bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique were better than that of simple bone transport technique, including shorter time in external fixator, shorter total cure time, lower anxiety score and better limb functions.

Evaluation of complications associated with bifocal bone transport as treatment for either proximal, intermediate or distal femoral defects caused by infection: outcome analysis of 76 patients

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of bifocal bone transport in the treatment of femoral bone defects caused by infections.

Methods

Clinical and radiographic data of patients with infected femoral nonunion treated by the bifocal bone transport at our hospital were analyzed retrospectively, from January 2008 to December 2019. Depending on the location of bone defects, the patients were divided into three groups (proximal, intermediate, and distal). The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria was applied to assess the bone and functional outcomes. Postoperative complications of three groups were documented and compared.

Results

Seventy-six cases of infected femoral bone defects (31 cases of proximal, 19 cases of intermediate, and 26 cases of distal) were managed by bifocal bone transport successfully with a mean follow-up time of 30.8 months (range, 23 to 41 months). There were 58 men (76.3%) and 18 women (23.6%), with a mean age of 38.8 years (range, 23 to 60 years). The bone union was received in 76 cases with a mean of 6.9 months (range, 5 to 8 months). Pin tract infection was observed in twenty-nine cases (38.1%), 7 cases (9.2%) of muscle contractures, 3 cases (7.9%) of joint stiffness, 13 cases (17.1%) of axial deviation, 2 cases (2.6%) of delayed union, one case (1.3%) of nonunion, and none (0%) of transport gap re-fracture. One patient (1.3%) was scheduled for knee arthroplasty when bone transport treatment ended.

Conclusions

Bone transport using an external rail fixator was a practical method to treat the femoral bone defects, since the satisfactory rate of bone union and limb function recovery. Complications of distal femoral bone transport were more severe than the proximal and intermedia, but the rate of complication was the least of the three groups. Soft-tissue-related complications were more likely to occur in the intermediate bone transport.

Limb reconstruction in a resource-limited environment

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage and reconstruction are often challenging and even more so in the limited resource setting. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the strategies for addressing the unique obstacles and opportunities of limb reconstructive surgery in resource-limited environments globally.

METHODS

We review (1) the global burden and dimension of the problem, (2) the relevance of orthopedic forums and communication, (3) free and open-access software for deformity analysis and correction, (4) bidirectional learning opportunities, and the value of fellowships and mentoring between resource-rich and resource-limited countries, and (5) how societies like SICOT can help to tackle the problem. Finally, case examples are presented to demonstrate the choice of surgical implants, their availability in regions with limited resources, and how the universal principles of limb reconstruction can be applied, irrespective of resource availability.

RESULTS

Limb reconstruction can often be life-changing surgery with the goals of limb salvage, improved function, and ambulation. The contradiction of relatively few severe limb deformities in high-income countries (HICs) with abundant resources and the considerable burden of limb deformities in resource-limited countries is striking. Free, open access to education and software planning tools are of paramount importance to achieve this goal of limb reconstruction. Bidirectional learning, i.e., knowledge exchange between individual surgeons and societies with limited and abundant resources, can be reached via fellowships and mentoring. The presented cases highlight (1) fixator-assisted wound closure obliviating the need for plastic surgery, (2) open bone transport, and (3) hinged Ilizarov frames for correction of severe deformities. These cases underline that optimal clinical outcome can be achieved with low-cost and readily available implants when the principles of limb reconstruction are skillfully applied.

DISCUSSION

Limb lengthening and reconstruction are based on universally applicable principles. These have to be applied regardless of the planning tool or surgical implant availability to achieve the goals of limb salvage and improved quality of life.

Risk factors of pin tract infection during bone transport using unilateral external fixator in the treatment of bone defects

Background

The bone transport using the unilateral external fixator, one of the Ilizarov techniques, is widely practiced in lower limb reconstructive surgery. Pin tract infection (PTI), one of most common complication, has become the important postoperative problems which plague clinicians gradually.

Methods

A group of 130 patients who received bone transport surgery for tibia or femur defects using the unilateral external fixation (Orthofix limb reconstruction system, Verona, Italy) and met the inclusion criteria were selected for the study from 2015 to 2019. Regular pin tract care was performed twice a day, and the conditions of the pin tract were evaluated by the same observer using clinical appearance criteria. The Saw’s classification of PTI was used to assess the condition around screws. After the data were significant by the T-test or Pearson’s Chi-square test analyzed, odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression tests to describe factors associated with the diagnosis of PTI.

Results

Ninety-one males and thirty-nine females with a mean age of 43 years (range 28–58 years) were included in this cohort. 7816 observations were documented from 12 to 36 months, and 58 cases (44.6%) of PTI (thirty-nine cases in grade 1, 17 cases in grade 2, and 2 cases in grade 3). The top five risk factors were agricultural work (OR 1.86, CI 0.94–2.39), non-urban living (OR 1.75, CI 1.24–3.26), male (OR 1.71, CI 1.02–2.31), smoking (OR 1.53, CI 0.76–1.89), and diabetes (OR 1.26, CI 1.12–2.64). No long-term sequelae were observed at the latest clinical visit.

Conclusion

Occupation, gender, living environment (non-urban), smoking, and diabetes were the top five significant risk factors for PTI in the period of bone transport using unilateral external fixation. Awareness of predictable risk factors of PTI is beneficial to avoid or early detect the severe complications which can affect the effectiveness.

Antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded hybrid transport versus traditional Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of large tibial defects after trauma

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded hybrid transport (ACSLHT) and traditional Ilizarov bone transport (TIBT) in the treatment of large tibial defects after trauma.

Methods

Eighty-five patients with large tibial defects after trauma were selected for retrospective study. The range of tibial defects was 6–22 cm. After thorough debridement and infection controlled, bone transport technique was used to reconstruct tibial defects. Forty-four patients were treated with ACSLHT technique (the ACSLHT group), while the other 41 were treated with TIBT technique (the TIBT group). Time in external fixator was evaluated by EFI score. Enneking score was used to evaluate limb functions. SAS score was used to evaluate postoperative anxiety status. In addition, complication incidence was compared, including axis deviation, docking site nonunion, infection recurrence and so on.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative general data between ACSLHT and TIBT group. EFI score in ACSLHT and TIBT group was 0.6 ± 0.1 cm/month and 1.7 ± 0.3 cm/month, respectively (P < 0.05). Enneking score of ACSLHT and TIBT group was 86.5% and 75.1% (P < 0.05). SAS score of ACSLHT group was significantly lower than that of TIBT group (P < 0.05). Complication incidence in ACSLHT group was significantly lower than that in TIBT group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with TIBT group, ACSLHT group had shorter time in external fixator, better limb functions, lower postoperative anxiety score and lower complication incidence which is worth of clinical promotion.

International recognition of the Ilizarov bone reconstruction techniques: Current practice and research (dedicated to 100th birthday of G. A. Ilizarov)

The Ilizarov method is one of the current methods used in bone reconstruction. It originated in the middle of the past century and comprises a number of bone reconstruction techniques executed with a ring external fixator developed by Ilizarov GA. Its main merits are viable new bone formation through distraction osteogenesis, high union rates and functional use of the limb throughout the course of treatment. The study of the phenomenon of distraction osteogenesis induced by tension stress with the Ilizarov apparatus was the impetus for advancement in bone reconstruction surgery. Since then, the original method has been used along with a number of its modifications developed due to emergence of new fixation devices and techniques of their application such as hexapod external fixators and motorized intramedullary lengthening nails. They gave rise to a relatively new orthopedic subspecialty termed “limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery”. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we summarized the recent clinical practice and research in bone reconstruction by the Ilizarov method with a special focus on its modification and recognition by the world orthopedic community. The international influence of the Ilizarov method was reviewed in regard to the origin country of the authors and journal’s rating. The Ilizarov method and other techniques based on distraction osteogenesis have been used in many countries and on all populated continents. It proves its international significance and confirms the greatest contribution of Ilizarov GA to bone reconstruction surgery.

Management of post-traumatic femoral defects with a monorail external fixator over an intramedullary nail

PURPOSE

The management of limb-length discrepancy secondary to traumatic femoral bone loss poses a unique challenge for surgeons. The Ilizarov technique is popular, but is associated with long external fixator time and many complications. This retrospective study assessed outcomes of post-traumatic femoral defects managed by monorail external fixation over an intramedullary nail.

METHODS

Eight patients were included from October 2015 to May 2019 with post-traumatic femoral defects that underwent treatment with monorail fixator-assisted intramedullary nailing. Primary outcome was time to bone union and bone results according to ASAMI classification. Secondary outcomes were lengthening index, consolidation time and index, external fixator index (EFI), time to partial weight bearing(PWB) and full weight bearing (FWB), and complications. Patient reported outcome measures including EQ-5D-5L, SF-36, Oxford knee scores (OKS), and Oxford hip scores (OHS) were recorded after recovery.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 227 weeks. Average bone defect size was 9.69 cm. Average consolidation time and index were 11.35 months and 1.24 months/cm, respectively. Mean lengthening and external fixator index were 20.2 days/cm and 23.88 days/cm, respectively. On average, patients achieved FWB and bone union 56.25 weeks and 68.83 weeks after bone transport initiation, respectively. Two patients had docking site non-union, five patients had pin site infections, and two patients had osteomyelitis. EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores were compared to UK population norms (p = 0.104, p = 0.238, respectively). Average OKS was 32.17 and OHS was 34.00.

CONCLUSION

Monorail external fixation over an intramedullary nail is an effective option for post-traumatic femoral defects, reducing external fixator time and returning patients' quality of life to a level comparable with the normal population.

An alternative therapeutic strategy for infected large bone defect and massive soft-tissue loss of leg-is free flap reconstruction inevitable?

PURPOSE

This study aims to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a non-flap therapeutic strategy for the limb salvage of infected composite bone and soft-tissue defects of a leg, attempting to describe some new techniques regards the docking of bone ends.

METHODS

Twelve patients with infected large tibial bone defect (mean size 12.1 ± 2.8 cm) and massive soft-tissue loss (mean size 254.5 ± 60.2 cm²) who were treated with the non-flap therapeutic strategy between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated and analyzed. The results of bone and function were assessed by the Paley criteria. The exercise capacity of patients was evaluated based on the following four aspects: walking, running, jumping, squatting, and going up/down the stairs.

RESULTS

During the treatment, shortening and re-lengthening technique was applied in six patients, bone transport technique in 12, submarine technique (SMT) in six, balloon dilatation technique (BDT) in seven, and soft-tissue incarceration creating technique (SICT) in seven. The mean external fixation time (EFT) and external fixation index (EFI) were 675.6 ± 179.2 days (range, 366-1040 days) and 60.1 ± 13.9 days/cm (range, 47.0-95.5 days/cm), respectively. Soft-tissue defect was successfully repaired for all patients. After a mean follow-up of 43.5 ± 23.2 months (range, 13-103 months), bone result was classified as "excellent" in ten patients, as "good" in one and "poor" in one, while functional result was graded as "excellent" in four patients and "good" in eight.

CONCLUSIONS

The non-flap therapeutic strategy could be cautiously considered as an alternative treatment for the large lower limb composite defects.

Ilizarov bone transport using an intramedullary cable transportation system in the treatment of tibial bone defects

INTRODUCTION

Segmental tibia defects remain challenging for orthopedic surgeons to treat. The aim of this study was to demonstrate bone-related and functional outcomes after treatment of complex tibial bone defects using Ilizarov bone transport with a modified intramedullary cable transportation system (CTS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including all 42 patients treated for tibial bone loss via Ilizarov bone transport with CTS between 2005 and 2018. Bone-related and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system. Complication and failure rates were determined by the patients' medical files.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 45.5 ± 15.1 years. The mean bone defect size was 7.7 ± 3.4 cm, the average nonunion scoring system (NUSS) score was 59 ± 9.5 points, and the mean follow-up was 40.8 ± 24.4 months (range, 13-139 months). Complete bone and soft tissue healing occurred in 32/42 patients (76.2%). These patients had excellent (10), good (17), fair (2), and poor (3) results based on the ASAMI functional score. Regarding bone stock, 19 patients had excellent, 10 good, and 3 fair results. In total, 37 minor complications and 62 major complications occurred during the study. In 7 patients, bone and soft tissue healing occurred after CTS failure with either an induced membrane technique or classic bone transport; 3 patients underwent lower leg amputation. Patients with treatment failure were significantly older (57.6 vs. 41.8 years; p = 0.003). Charlson score and treatment failure had a positive correlation (Spearman's rho 0.43; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Bone transport using both intramedullary CTS and Ilizarov ring fixation is viable for treating patients with bone loss of the tibia and complex infection or soft tissue conditions. However, a high number of complications and surgical revisions are associated with the treatment of this severe clinical entity and should be taken into account.

The efficiency of internal fixation with bone grafting at docking sites after bone transport for treatment of large segmental tibial bone defects

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficiency of internal fixation with bone grafting after bone transport for treatment in large-segment bone defects of the lower-limbs.

METHODS

This prospective study recruited 100 patients with lower limb tibial segmental bone defects, and based on a random number table they were divided into a control group (n=50, simple bone transport surgery) or an observation group (n=50, internal fixation with bone grafting at docking site after bone transport). The fracture healing time, bone healing index, external fixation time in both groups were compared. The knee function, joint range of motion, and the function of the ankle and hindfoot before and after surgery were also analyzed and compared between the two groups respectively, as well as the rate of complications in both groups was calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with the preoperative condition of patients, the Lysholm knee scale, ROM score, and AHS scores of patients in the two groups were significantly increased 10 months after surgery, moreover, those scores of the observation group were higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The fracture healing time and external fixation time of patients were significantly declined in the observation group when compared to the control group, additionally, the bone healing index was also reduced significantly (P<0.05). When compared with patients in the control group, the ratios of bone healing and lower-limb functional recovery of patients in the observation group were significantly higher while the total complication incidence was decreased remarkably (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Internal fixation with bone grafting after bone transport can promote fracture healing, improve joint function, and reduce complications during treatment for a large segmental bone defects in the lower limbs.

Risk factors of ankle osteoarthritis in the treatment of critical bone defects using ilizarov technique

Background

Distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov external circular fixator has been applied in lower limb reconstructive surgery widely. The increasing ankle osteoarthritis (OA) progression and severity are often associated with the period of external fixator and the greater relative instability of the ankle joint, but few studies have quantified risk factors directly during this technique.

Methods

The study was conducted on 236 patients who underwent bone transport surgery for tibias using the Ilizarov external circular fixator from 2008 to 2018. The cumulative incidence of ankle OA diagnoses in patients after the Ilizarov technique treatment was calculated and stratified by risk factors from preoperative and postoperative management. After the data were significant through the Mann-Whitney U test analyzed, odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to describe factors associated with the OA diagnosis including gender, age, BMI, location of bone defect, diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, the history of metal allergy and glucocorticoid intake, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-HF scale scores, defect size (DS), the type of bone transport, the bone union time, external fixator time (EFT), and external fixator index (EFI).

Results

There were 199 males and 37 females with a mean age of 47 years (range 28–59 years). Out of 236 patients, 49 had an additional treatment for ankle OA after the Ilizarov technique treatment of bone defects (average follow-up time 2.1 years, range 1.6–4.2 years). The incidence of postoperative ankle OA was 20.8 %, with 19 patients classified as K&L grade 3 and seven patients as grade 4. The top five risk factors included double-level bone transport (OR3.79, P = 0.005), EFI > 50days/cm (OR3.17, P = 0.015), age > 45years (OR2.29, P = 0.032), osteoporosis (OR1.58, P < 0.001), BMI > 25 (OR1.34, P < 0.001). Male, BMI > 25, diabetes, osteoporosis, and AOFAS ankle-HF scale scores are the independent risk factors.

Conclusions

Ilizarov external circular fixator is a safe and effective method of treatment for critical bone defects. The double level bone transport, EFI > 50days/cm, age > 45years, osteoporosis, BMI > 25 are the top five relevant risk factors of ankle OA. The probability of developing ankle OA among patients having three or more risk factors is 50–70 %.

Management of segmental bone defects of the upper limb: a scoping review with data synthesis to inform decision making

PURPOSE

Injuries to the long bones of the upper limb resulting in bone defects are rare but potentially devastating. Literature on the management of these injuries is limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of this study was to collate the most recent published work on the management of upper limb bone defects to assist with evidence based management when confronted with these cases.

METHODS

Following a preliminary search that confirmed the paucity of literature and lack of comparative trials, a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was conducted. A literature search of major electronic databases was conducted to identify journal articles relating to the management of upper limb long bone defects published between 2010 and 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 46 publications reporting on the management of 341 patients were reviewed. Structural autograft, bone transport, one-bone forearm and the induced membrane technique were employed in an almost equal number of cases. The implemented strategies showed similar outcomes but different indications and complication profiles were observed.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary techniques for the management of post-traumatic upper limb bone defects all produce good results. Specific advantages, disadvantages and complications for each modality should be considered when deciding on which management strategy to employ for each specific patient, anatomical location, and defect size.

One-stage debridement and bone transport versus first-stage debridement and second-stage bone transport for the management of lower limb post-traumatic osteomyelitis

Background

Treatment of lower limb post-traumatic osteomyelitis used to be a staged process, with radical debridement of bone and soft tissues at first stage, followed by a second-stage limb reconstruction operation to restore the limb integrity. Some studies recently reported that achieving infection eradication and limb reconstruction at single-stage seems to be an effective method for lower limb infection, but a comparative study remains lacking. This study aims to compare the results of radical debridement combined with a first/second-staged osteotomy and bone transport, for the management of lower limb post-traumatic osteomyelitis.

Methods

From January 2013 to June 2018, a total of 102 patients with lower limb post-traumatic osteomyelitis met the criteria were included for analysis, in which 70 patients received one-stage debridement, antibiotic-loaded implantation, metaphysis osteotomy and bone transport were named as one-stage group, while 32 patients with first-stage debridement and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation, second-stage osteotomy and bone transport were devised as two-stage group. The outcomes of hospitalization (hospital stay, costs of treatment, surgical time, antibiotic usage) and follow-up (infection-free, treatment failure, infection recurrence, external fixation index (EFI) and docking site union) between the two groups were retrospectively compared.

Results

For outcomes of hospitalization, patients in the one-stage group had batter results on hospital stay (18.2 days versus 28.9 days, P ​< ​0.05), surgical time (164.8 ​min versus 257.4 ​min, P ​< ​0.05), cost of treatment (¥101726.1 versus ¥126718.8, P ​< ​0.05) and the course of antibiotic usage (10.3 days versus 12.0 days, P ​< ​0.05). During the follow-up, 87.1% (61/70) patients in the one-stage group compared to 93.8% (30/32) patients in the two-stage group achieved infection-free (P ​> ​0.05) without any additional debridement operation. 94.3% (66/70) patients in the one-stage group earned wound healing after the operation, comparing to 96.9% (31/32) patients healed in the two-stage group (P ​> ​0.05). Uncontrolled infection was observed on 4 (5.7%) patients in the one-stage group and 1 (3.1%) patients in the two-stage group (P ​> ​0.05), with a result of three achieved infection free in the one-stage group and one patient suffered from amputation in each group respectively. 5 (7.2%) patients in the one-stage group and 1 (3.2%) patient in the two-stage group encountered with infection recurrence (P ​> ​0.05) and were well-managed with re-debridement and antibiotics usage. Significance was not found between two groups on EFI (74.8 days/cm versus 69.0 days/cm, P ​> ​0.05) and docking site nonunion rate (14.5% versus 18.9%, P ​> ​0.05), indicating that bone transport in different stages played a less essential role on bone generation process. The other complications, such as prolonged aseptic drainage [24.3% (17/70) versus 21.9% (7/32)], re-fracture [5.8% (4/69) versus 3.2% (1/31)], pin-tract infection [23.2% (16/69) versus 19.4% (6/31)], joint stiffness and deformity [26.1% (18/69) versus 32.3% (10/31)], also showed less significance when comparing between two groups (P ​> ​0.05), suggesting that different transport stages play little role on complications formation.

Conclusions

One-stage radical debridement and bone transport was proven to be a safe and effective method for treating static (or near static) lower limb osteomyelitis.

Translational potential statement

Translational potential statement One-stage debridement and bone transport is sample, effective and time-saving, with similar complications compared to conventional two-stage protocol. This treatment protocol might provide an alternative for the treatment of static (or near static) lower limb osteomyelitis.

Infected bone defects in the lower limb. Management by means of a two-stage distraction osteogenesis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Although bone transport is generally accepted as the gold standard for the treatment of segmental septic bone defects, some aspects of its practical application are still open to debate. We present our results in this field and compare them with the series published so far.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed all our patients (2010-2018) that underwent a bone transport procedure in the lower limb due to a septic bone defect. We calculated the bone healing index (BHI), the external fixation index (EFI), the rate of complications and the clinical results. We statistically compared our results with 63 publications with a similar scope.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (30 M/5F) with a mean age of 40 years and a mean follow-up of 45 months were included. Bone segment was 24 T/11F and mean defect was 8.4 cm (7.34 T/ 10.73F). Mean global BHI was 45.62 days/cm (48.16 T/40.09F). Mean EFI was 2.37 months/cm. Results were excellent in 9 patients, good in 23 and bad in 3. Bone graft was used in 60% of the cases.

DISCUSSION

The size of our series is similar to previously published ones, although the mean age of our patients is higher and they present a larger bone defect. BHI of our series is similar to that of other series, although EFI is significantly higher. The number of complications is also in line with the existing literature.

CONCLUSION

The use of a two-stage technique for managing segmental bone defects of septic origin in the lower extremity is a valid alternative. Our series shows results comparable to the current literature.

Reconstruction of massive tibial bone and soft tissue defects by trifocal bone transport combined with soft tissue distraction: experience from 31 cases

BACKGROUND

Large post-traumatic tibial bone defects combined with soft tissue defects are a common orthopedic clinical problem associated with poor outcomes when treated using traditional surgical methods. The study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of trifocal bone transport (TFT) and soft-tissue transport with the Ilizarov technique for large posttraumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with massive posttraumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects from May 2009 to May 2016. All of the eligible patients were managed by TFT and soft-tissue transport. The median age was 33.4 years (range, 2-58 years). The mean defect of bone was 11.87 cm ± 2.78 cm (range, 8.2-18.2 cm) after radical resection performed by TFT. The soft tissue defects ranged from 7 cm × 8 cm to 24 cm × 12 cm. The observed results included bone union time, wound close time and true complications. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system was used to assess bone and functional results and postoperative complications were evaluated by Paley classification.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up after frame removal was 32 months (range, 12-96 months). All cases achieved complete union in both the elongation sites and the docking sites, and eradication of infection. The mean bone transport time was 94.04 ± 23.33 days (range, 63.7-147 days). The mean external fixation time was 22.74 ± 6.82 months (range, 14-37 months), and the mean external fixation index (EFI) was 1.91 ± 0.3 months/cm (range, 1.2-2.5 months/cm). The bone results were excellent in 6 patients, good in 14 patients, fair in 8 patients and poor in 3 patients. The functional results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 15 patients, fair in 5 patients and poor in 3 patients.

CONCLUSION

TFT, in conjunction with soft tissue transport technique, can give good results in most patients (in this article, good and excellent results were observed in 64% of patients). Soft tissue transport is a feasible method in providing good soft tissue coverage on the bone ends. Although it has no advantages over microvascular techniques, it might be an good alternative in the absence of an experienced flap surgeon. Nonetheless, high-quality controlled studies are needed to assess its long-term safety and efficacy.

Treatment of diaphyseal forearm defects caused by infection using Ilizarov segmental bone transport technique

Background

The Ilizarov segmental bone transport technique can be applied in the reconstruction of the bone defects with less invasive fashion and more versatility compared to other methods, while most studies were focused on the lower extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ilizarov segmental bone transport technique in the treatment of diaphyseal forearm bone defects caused by infection.

Methods

This study included 12 patients with diaphyseal forearm bone defects caused by infection, who underwent bone transport procedures using the monolateral external fixator at our institution from January 2010 to January 2018, including 10 males and 2 females with a mean age of 39 years (range 23–57 years). Patient’s demographic data and clinical outcomes at least two years follow-up after removing the external fixator were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The functional results were evaluated by the questionnaire of Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the modified Mayo wrist score (MWS) at the final follow-up.

Results

There were 10 radii and 2 ulnae bone transport procedures collected. The average defect size was 5.1 cm (4-6.5 cm). All patients were successfully followed up with a mean period of 28.2 months (24 to 36 months) and achieved infection-free union. There was no recurrence of infection observed. The mean external fixation time was 232.6 days (182 to 276 days), and the mean external fixation index was 46.3 days/cm (40.9 to 61.8 days/cm). The mean DASH score was 30.6(18 to 49) preoperative, while 13.8 (5 to 26) at the final follow-up. The average modified MWS improved from 68.8 (55 to 80) pre-operatively to 83.8 (65 to 90) at the final follow-up. All the differences between the preoperative and final scores were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Almost all the patients achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes and were able to perform activities of daily living.

Conclusions

Ilizarov segmental bone transport technique is an alternative and effective method for the treatment of diaphyseal forearm bone defects caused by infection, and this method acquired satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Management of critical-sized bone defects in the treatment of fracture-related infection: a systematic review and pooled analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review determined the reported treatment strategies, their individual success rates, and other outcome parameters in the management of critical-sized bone defects in fracture-related infection (FRI) patients between 1990 and 2018.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on treatment and outcome of critical-sized bone defects in FRI was performed. Treatment strategies identified were, autologous cancellous grafts, autologous cancellous grafts combined with local antibiotics, the induced membrane technique, vascularized grafts, Ilizarov bone transport, and bone transport combined with local antibiotics. Outcomes were bone healing and infection eradication after primary surgical protocol and recurrence of FRI and amputations at the end of study period.

RESULTS

Fifty studies were included, describing 1530 patients, the tibia was affected in 82%. Mean age was 40 years (range 6-80), with predominantly male subjects (79%). Mean duration of infection was 17 months (range 1-624) and mean follow-up 51 months (range 6-126). After initial protocolized treatment, FRI was cured in 83% (95% CI 79-87) of all cases, increasing to 94% (95% CI 92-96) at the end of each individual study. Recurrence of infection was seen in 8% (95% CI 6-11) and amputation in 3% (95% CI 2-3). Final outcomes overlapped across treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION

Results should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective and observational design of most studies, the lack of clear classification systems, incomplete data reports, potential underreporting of adverse outcomes, and heterogeneity in patient series. A consensus on classification, treatment protocols, and outcome is needed to improve reliability of future studies.

Management of Osseous Defects in the Tibia: Utilization of External Fixation, Distraction Osteogenesis, and Bone Transport

The use of external fixators for distraction osteogenesis has revolutionized treatment options for segmental bone defects in the tibia. Following corticotomy, the latency phase allows the biologic environment to initiate healing, and optimized distraction rates produce regenerate. Regenerate consolidation can be improved with local and systemic biologic optimization. Consolidation time is often considered to be 3 to 4 times longer than distraction in adults. Soft tissue considerations are important during external fixation and distraction. Additionally, slow regenerate can be benefited by various techniques discussed in this article. Distraction osteogenesis is a beneficial tool for segmental bone defects.