Immunmodulatorische Stufentherapie der Multiplen Sklerose

Monomethyl Fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) for the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent neurologic autoimmune disorder affecting two million people worldwide. Symptoms include gait abnormalities, perception and sensory losses, cranial nerve pathologies, pain, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional aberrancies. Traditional therapy includes corticosteroids for the suppression of relapses and injectable interferons. Recently, several modern therapies-including antibody therapy and oral agents-were approved as disease-modifying agents. Monomethyl fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) is a recent addition to the arsenal available in the fight against MS and appears to be well-tolerated, safe, and effective. In this paper, we review the evidence available regarding the use of monomethyl fumarate (Bafiertam) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS.

Navigating choice in multiple sclerosis management

Background

With the advent of modern immunotherapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and the increasing amount of treatment options on the market, MS has evolved as a treatable disease. Yet, at the same time, new challenges for the treating neurologists arise.

Main body

This review article covers some of these challenges, including when and how to start treatment, treatment monitoring, and finally considerations on what the increasing choice in treatment options brings to disease management and longer-term planning. Among others, these important issues comprise pregnancy, treatment sequencing, switching or even stopping treatment.

Conclusion

The ultimate goal for navigating choices in RRMS management is to choose the right drug for the right patient at the right time Throughout the article, there is a strong focus on practical aspects and individual decision making in MS to meet the concept of personalized medicine.

Multiple Sclerosis Therapy With Disease-Modifying Treatments in Germany: The PEARL (ProspEctive phArmacoeconomic cohoRt evaluation) Noninterventional Study Protocol

Background

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) require long-term therapy and have a wide variety of needs for health-related support. The efficacy and safety of MS therapy, as assessed by both clinicians and patients, are important parameters that need to be considered. However, few studies combine data on efficacy and safety outcomes with pharmacoeconomic data.

Objective

Here, we present the study design of the ProspEctive phArmacoeconomic cohoRt evaluation (PEARL), a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional cohort study on patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with disease-modifying treatments (DMTs).

Methods

During a prospective observational phase of 24 months per patient, PEARL evaluated clinical and patient-perceived efficacy and safety measures, as well as pharmacoeconomic data on RRMS patients treated with DMTs—interferon beta and glatiramer acetate. Measurements of the patients' perceptions included the assessment of patient-reported quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and compliance. The study was planned to include 1800 outpatients from 180 German neurological practices who had continuously been treated with an approved DMT for at least 30 days. The primary statistical analyses of the PEARL study will be descriptive. Particular focus will be on specific subgroups, such as patients who switched DMTs during therapy and patients with disease worsening or disease activity. Subgroups will be compared using stratified analyses.

Results

Data collection for PEARL started in September 2010 and ended in July 2013. As of July 2015, the study is completed and is currently being analyzed and written up.

Conclusions

PEARL is evaluating both the health status and resource utilization of RRMS patients treated with DMTs in Germany. The combination of pharmacoeconomic data with clinical and patients' self-perceived efficacy and safety outcomes will add useful information to the currently incomplete picture of the overall RRMS burden in Germany.

Multiple sclerosis in Germany: data analysis of administrative prevalence and healthcare delivery in the statutory health system

Background

Healthcare-utilization data for multiple sclerosis (MS) are scarce in Germany. The Purpose of the study was to analyse administrative prevalence of MS, medication use and type of specialists involved in MS treatment in the outpatient setting in Bavaria.

Methods

Pseudonymized claims data from Bavarian Statutory Health Insurance (SHI)-accredited physicians were used. Administrative prevalence of MS was defined as having ≥1 MS diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, code G35) documented by a neurologist or psychiatrist, or ≥1 prescription for disease-modifying drugs (DMDs)). The administrative prevalence calculated for Bavaria was projected to Germany. DMD prescription and involvement of different specialities in health care service for MS patients was analysed.

Results

Administrative prevalence of MS in Bavaria increased from 0.123% to 0.175% of insured persons between 2005 and 2009; when projected, this yielded ~102,000–143,000 patients with MS in the German population. The percentage of patients receiving ≥1 DMD prescription increased from 45.5% to 50.5%. Patients with MS were mainly treated by neurologists in the ambulatory care setting.

Conclusions

These results provide important information on the administrative prevalence of MS in Bavaria and on healthcare provision for patients, which is relevant for resource planning in the healthcare sector.

Interferon-β1bin multiple sclerosis

In 1993, interferon (IFN)-beta(1b) for subcutaneous injection became the first US FDA-approved immunomodulatory treatment for multiple sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS. In this review of IFN-beta(1b), we first present a short introduction to multiple sclerosis and currently available therapeutics. We then summarize current knowledge about the biochemical structure of IFN-beta(1b), as well as pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, including data on putative mechanisms underlying therapeutic as well as adverse effects. Furthermore, a critical review of ongoing and recently published clinical trials investigating IFN-beta(1b) in multiple sclerosis will be provided. Main topics are: trials investigating IFN-beta(1b) after a first clinical event, at higher dosages or in comparison to once-weekly subcutaneous IFN-beta(1a) injections, 16 years of long-term follow-up, IFN-beta(1b) in Japanese patients, the role of neutralizing antibodies, biomarkers for the prediction of therapy response, IFN-beta(1b) and pregnancy, and IFN-beta(1b) treatment of children with multiple sclerosis. Finally, we discuss how novel drugs, especially monoclonal antibodies and orally administered immunosuppressants, might soon challenge the position of this well-established agent on the multiple sclerosis therapeutics market.

Immunoadsorption in steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis: clinical experience in 60 patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with a frequently relapsing or progressive course. For steroid-resistant relapse, plasma exchange (PE) has been established as guidelines-recommended treatment option. While PE is a non-selective extracorporeal blood purification process with elimination of plasma and subsequent substitution, immunoadsorption (IA) is a selective technique for the removal of autoantibodies and immune complexes with less adverse effects. So far there are only few reports on the treatment of MS by IA. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of IA as an escalation therapy in MS patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients with steroid-refractory MS relapse were treated by IA and analyzed retrospectively. Patients received six standardized IA sessions using a non-regenerable tryptophan immunoadsorber, at average 58 days after first indications of relapse. The treated plasma volume was two liters per IA session. Outcome was measured as improvement in relapse symptoms. From the pilot phase of the study comprising the first fourteen patients, detailed neurological examinations before and after IA such as Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Functional System Score (FS) and visual acuity are reported. Of the following 46 patients, only qualitative data regarding the therapeutic success, and in addition clinical data on tolerability, are presently available.

RESULTS

In 53 of 60 patients clinically relevant improvement of the main symptom of MS relapse was noted after IA, there was no change in six patients, deterioration in one. This corresponds to a response rate of 88%. Symptomatic improvement was first registered on average after the third IA. 87.5% of patients could be treated through a peripheral venous access. Only 12.5% needed a central venous catheter. In four of 396 single treatments (1%) significant complications occurred, mild side effects or discomfort were registered 16 times (4%). If peripheral venous access was chosen, missed puncture or puncture hematoma occurred in 22 cases (5.5%).

CONCLUSION

Immunoadsorption for the treatment of steroid-refractory MS relapse is safe and effective. The response rate was 88% and non-inferior to previous results with plasma exchange. Due to good tolerability, the treatment with immunoadsorption, which is usually possible through a peripheral venous access, can be performed on an outpatient basis.

[Interferon-β1b in multiple sclerosis therapy: more than 20 years clinical experience]

The introduction of interferon-β1b in 1993 in the USA and 2 years later in Europe made it possible for the first time to alter the course of the disease in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Subsequently, interferon-β1b was approved for the treatment of patients with active secondary progressive MS (1999) and early relapsing-remitting MS following a first demyelinating event (clinically isolated syndrome, CIS) (2006). Here we provide an overview of the clinical experience gathered during more than 20 years of interferon-β use focusing on long-term efficacy and safety and the impact of early initiation of treatment. Furthermore, the following aspects will be discussed: putative mechanisms of action of interferon-β, indications for a disease-modifying therapy, clinical relevance of neutralizing antibodies, importance of adherence in MS therapy, high versus low frequency therapy, combination therapies with interferon-β and safety of interferon-β in children and adolescents with MS and during pregnancy.

[Administration of intravenous immunoglobulins in neurology. An evidence-based consensus: update 2010]

Our knowledge on the clinical efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in neurological diseases has greatly increased in the last 5 years. Liquid formulations with a higher concentration of IVIg have simplified administration. Despite a worldwide increase in plasma production it is still a valuable biological product which is why current indications must be continuously validated. Long-term efficacy of the preparation Gamunex could be demonstrated in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In acute myasthenic worsening a dose of 1 g IVIg/kg body weight appears to be sufficient for clinical stabilization. New indications, such as the postpolio syndrome or Alzheimer's disease are being explored in clinical trials. In addition to the consensus statement from 2004 the evidence for clinical use of IVIg has been re-evaluated and recommendations are given.

Anti-inflammatory effects of FTY720 do not prevent neuronal cell loss in a rat model of optic neuritis

In multiple sclerosis, long-term disability is caused by axonal and neuronal damage. Established therapies target primarily the inflammatory component of the disease, but fail to prevent neurodegeneration. Fingolimod (codenamed FTY720) is an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator with promising results in phase II trials in multiple sclerosis patients and is under further development as a novel treatment for multiple sclerosis. To evaluate whether FTY720 has neuroprotective properties, we tested this drug in a rat model of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced optic neuritis. FTY720 exerted significant anti-inflammatory effects during optic neuritis and reduced inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage; however, FTY720 treatment did not prevent apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the neurons that form the axons of the optic nerve. Consistent with this lack of effect on RGC survival, FTY720 treatment did not improve visual function, nor did it prevent apoptosis of RGCs in vitro. We observed a persistent activation of apoptotic signaling pathways in RGCs under FTY720 treatment, a possible underlying mechanism for the lack of neuroprotection in the presence of strong anti-inflammatory effects, Furthermore, FTY720 shifted the remaining inflammation in the optic nerve toward neurotoxicity by modest up-regulation of potential neurotoxic cytokines. We conclude that FTY720-induced anti-inflammation and axon protection did not of itself protect neurons from apoptotic cell death.

Multiple Sklerose

Die multiple Sklerose (MS) ist eine der häufigsten neurologischen Erkrankungen, für deren Ursache es bislang keine einheitliche Erklärung gibt. Grundpfeiler der Diagnostik ist die Klinik, ergänzt durch die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT). Eine Liquoruntersuchung zum Nachweis der entzündlichen Genese nachgewiesener multifokaler Störungen ist bei allen unklaren Fällen und bei älteren Patienten erforderlich. Zur Bestätigung und Verlaufskontrolle sind elektrophysiologische Verfahren hilfreich.

[Interferon β for multiple sclerosis. How much is good enough?]

Interferon β-1b (IFNB-1b, Betaferon®) was the first therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) showing efficacy in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Early studies suggested a dose-dependency of the clinical efficacy of IFNB-1b. However, until recently no reliable clinical data were available to assess the potential of higher dosing to increase therapeutic efficacy. In addition, no clinical trials have been conducted to directly compare the efficacy of IFNB-1b with that of glatiramer acetate, an alternative first line treatment option for relapsing-remitting MS. Just recently, the prospective, randomized, multicenter study BEYOND was published which addressed both issues. In this review the BEYOND trial is reviewed and placed in the context of advantages and disadvantages of currently available first line therapies for MS.

Adhesion molecules are promising candidates to establish surrogate markers for natalizumab treatment

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab is the first monoclonal antibody therapy approved for multiple sclerosis (MS). Its therapeutic mechanism is the blockade of the α4-integrin subunit of the adhesion molecule (AM) very late activation antigen-4 (VLA-4), which leads to an inhibition of immune cell extravasation into the central nervous system (CNS).

METHODS

We investigated changes in the expression levels of unblocked α4-integrin and further AM (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, -2, -3 (cICAM-1, -2, -3), leukocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)) on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) determined by flow cytometry from 25 patients with MS before the first natalizumab infusion and before the fourth infusion. In 15 MS patients AM expression was evaluated every 3 months over 1 year.

RESULTS

We found a significant decrease (p < 0.0001) of unblocked α4-integrin cell surface expression on all investigated PBMC subsets (T cells -61.7%, B cells -69.1%, monocytes/macrophages -46.4%) in the blood of MS patients after 3 months of natalizumab treatment. Moreover, a continuous decrease (p < 0.05) of unblocked α4-integrin expression levels was seen after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. As a secondary effect, expression levels of the other investigated AM were differentially affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show a sustained decrease of unblocked α4-integrin expression not only in all patients but also in all investigated PBMC subsets. This probably results in a continuously decreasing transmigration of PBMC into the CNS and may explain the improved clinical efficacy in the second treatment year and also the increasing risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy during long-term natalizumab therapy. We conclude that AM expression profiles are promising candidates for the development of a biomarker system to determine both natalizumab treatment response and patients at risk for opportunistic CNS infections.

[Radiologically isolated syndrome: multiple sclerosis based solely on MRI findings?]

Incidental brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are the result of an increasing usage of MRI in the diagnostic work-up of patients. An adequate assessment of patients in which brain lesions typical for multiple sclerosis (MS) are determined but who have been asymptomatic so far is problematic, especially when Barkhof-Tintoré criteria for spatial dissemination are fulfilled and no other differential diagnosis can be confirmed. This entity, the so-called radiologically isolated syndrome, constitutes a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Two recent studies revealed that a subgroup of patients with radiologically isolated syndrome are at high risk for near-term development of MR-based progression and occurrence of the first clinical event. Hence, the radiologically isolated syndrome has to be classified as a possible preliminary phase of the clinical manifestation of MS in a subgroup of patients and entails in-depth therapeutic considerations. This article covers the current literature for this syndrome and, in the absence of official guidelines, provides a pragmatic diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patient management.

Characteristics of multiple sclerosis at onset and delay of diagnosis and treatment in Spain (the Novo Study)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease supposedly of autoimmune origin, with reactivity directed against myelin antigens. From the neuropathological point of view, MS produces inflammation, demyelination and axonal and neuronal degeneration. Inflammatory phenomena are predominant in the initial phase of the disease, followed later by neurodegenerative processes. Over the last decade, early treatment, during the most inflammatory phase of the disease, has been considered the best strategy to treat MS. Accordingly, we decided to determine the periods of delay between the first symptoms and the time to the first medical visit, the time to referral to a specialised MS unit, the delay in undertaking clinical and paraclinical tests, the diagnostic criteria used and the overall delay in diagnosis and treatment. The median time from onset of first symptoms to the first visit to a physician was 19.2 months, which represented the greatest delay. The median time between this initial medical consultation and the confirmation of the diagnosis by a specialised MS unit was 5.7 months, and the overall time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 24.9 months (2.08 years). The median time between onset of the first symptoms and the decision to give the first treatment was 2 years. The most important delay was that from symptom onset to the first medical visit, with the other delays being less. Thus, it is during this initial period that greater effort is required in order to reduce the time to diagnosis, by increasing awareness of the problem of MS among the general population and primary care physicians.

CIS case studies

The onset of multiple sclerosis presents in 85% of cases as a subacute clinical event, the so-called clinically isolated syndrome. This event involves either focal or multifocal brain regions, most frequently the optic nerve, brainstem or spinal cord. The initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis necessitates the demonstration of dissemination of pathology in time and space, as well as the exclusion of other alternative diagnoses, and can be challenging. Confirming a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis is a sensitive time for both patient and physician. The patient is faced with a difficult diagnosis and the physician must consider making difficult treatment decisions regarding therapy and follow-up care. This article presents a number of case studies that illustrate the diversity of presentation of clinically isolated syndrome and the challenges associated with confirming a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

National MS registries

This review gives an overview of national registries that are currently in use for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The large-scale registries described herein include the Danish MS Registry, the Norwegian MS Registry, the Swedish MS Registry, the Italian MS Database Network, the North-American NARCOMS Registry, and the German MS Registry. These MS registries are extremely helpful for studying disease characteristics in large populations and monitoring the long-term outcome of disease-modifying therapies. Furthermore, an almost complete ascertainment of cases provides information on the provision of treatments, services and supplies within a given area that may be used to compare different levels of health care within and between these regions. In the long-term, MS registries monitor the health care situation of MS patients over time including the implementation of guidelines relating to care and treatment, measure the improvements that have taken place, and reveal shortages and/or misalignment in health care services. The information gathered herein is not only useful for the long-term follow-up of the individual patient, but also for society as a whole by increasing understanding of and knowledge about MS and allowing national authorities and relevant parties to make informed and relevant decisions about MS.

Corticosteroids and plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis

Corticosteroids (CS) remain a mainstay of treatment for relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) and optic neuritis. Currently, there is not enough evidence that long-term corticosteroid treatment delays progression of long-term disability in patients with MS. Likewise, it is unclear whether there are, in fact, true differences among the various CS agents, doses, and their applications in specific pulse and tapering regimens.In some patients suffering from severe steroid-resistant relapses, the clinical response to CS treatment may be insufficient. Such patients may obtain clinical benefit from subsequent plasma exchange (PE). PE is increasingly considered as an individual treatment decision in patients with severe relapses not properly responding to CS. Because of the lack of appropriate studies, PE is not recommended as a permanent disease-modifying strategy in MS patients.

Monoclonal antibodies in the therapy of multiple sclerosis: an overview

With the generation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a new therapeutical concept has gained importance. MAbs aim against selective antigens and so have changed our treatment strategies from non-specific to specific. Four therapeuticals have gained importance in the therapy of multiple sclerosis (MS): One has already been approved for therapy (natalizumab), whereas the other three are either in clinical trials or are about to enter phase III studies. Currently, two phase III studies that evaluate the efficacy of alemtuzumab have begun with recruitment (MS CARE I and II). Another mAb (daclizumab) under study is directed to the interleukin-2alpha chain (CD25). Results of clinical trials are promising by reporting reduction of relapses and progression in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive MS accompanied by reduction of new lesions in magnetic resonance imaging. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of daclizumab in MS is going to be initiated. Trials with a humanised antibody directed against the cell surface molecule CD20 are under development. Although the future will emphasise this trend to mAbs, the risks should not be ignored as has been shown in recent news. Still, mAbs have the possibility to revolutionise therapeutical concepts in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, and will therefore be a useful addition to current therapeutic concepts.

Patient education program to enhance decision autonomy in multiple sclerosis relapse management: a randomized-controlled trial

Background

Contrary to strong recommendations for high-dose intravenous corticosteroid treatment for relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS), uncertainty remains about most aspects of relapse management. Oral corticosteroids administered by physicians or patients themselves or no corticosteroids also appear justifiable.

Objective

To evaluate an education program that aims to involve patients with MS in decisions on relapse management.

Methods

In three German MS centers, 150 patients with relapsing MS were randomly assigned to a single, 4-h group session or a standard information leaflet. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of relapses with oral or no corticosteroid therapy as an indicator of patient autonomy in treatment decision making. Other outcomes included perceived decision autonomy, quality of life, and disability status.

Results

In the intervention group (IG), 108/139 (78%) relapses were treated with oral or no corticosteroids compared with 101/179 (56%) in the control group; P < 0.0001. Patients’ perceived autonomy of treatment decision making was significantly higher in the IG; P < 0.0001. Quality of life, disability status, and adverse events of corticosteroid therapies were comparable.

Conclusion

The patient education program led to more autonomous decision making in patients with relapsing MS. Relevant changes in relapse management were observed.

Flupirtine as neuroprotective add-on therapy in autoimmune optic neuritis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that results in persistent impairment in young adults. During chronic progressive disease stages, there is a strong correlation between neurodegeneration and disability. Current therapies fail to prevent progression of neurological impairment during these disease stages. Flupirtine, a drug approved for oral use in patients suffering from chronic pain, was used in a rat model of autoimmune optic neuritis and significantly increased the survival of retinal ganglion cells, the neurons that form the axons of the optic nerve. When flupirtine was combined with interferon-beta, an established immunomodulatory therapy for MS, visual functions of the animals were improved during the acute phase of optic neuritis. Furthermore, flupirtine protected retinal ganglion cells from degeneration in a noninflammatory animal model of optic nerve transection. Although flupirtine was shown previously to increase neuronal survival by Bcl-2 up-regulation, this mechanism does not appear to play a role in flupirtine-mediated protection of retinal ganglion cells either in vitro or in vivo. Instead, we showed through patch-clamp investigations that the activation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels is involved in flupirtine-mediated neuroprotection. Considering the few side effects reported in patients who receive long-term flupirtine treatment for chronic pain, our results indicate that this drug is an interesting candidate for further evaluation of its neuroprotective potential in MS.

[Choice of early and escalation treatment options for multiple sclerosis]

Recent advances in understanding of the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) have led to the development of new treatment options. To date several immunomodulatory agents have been licensed for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. However, some debate remains on the optimal time point for initiating therapy. While there is general consensus on the benefit of an early treatment start, the issues of how to define "early MS" and how to identify patients with a "benign" disease course have not yet been finally addressed. Further open questions include the situations of treatment failure and therapeutic escalation. Here we summarize available data from studies on early treatment with immunomodulatory drugs for a first demyelinating event, also referred to as clinically isolated syndrome. Furthermore, options for the escalation of immunomodulatory therapy will be discussed, e.g. with the recently licensed monoclonal antibody natalizumab.

Complementary and alternative medicine for multiple sclerosis

We analyzed characteristics, motivation, and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in a large sample of people with multiple sclerosis. A 53-item survey was mailed to the members of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society, chapter of Baden-Wuerttemberg. Surveys of 1573 patients (48.5 ± 11.7 years, 74% women, duration of illness 18.1 ± 10.5 years) were analyzed. In comparison with conventional medicine, more patients displayed a positive attitude toward complementary and alternative medicine (44% vs 38%, P < 0.05), with 70% reporting lifetime use of at least one method. Among a wide variety of complementary and alternative medicine, diet modification (41%), Omega-3 fatty acids (37%), removal of amalgam fillings (28%), vitamins E (28%), B (36%), and C (28%), homeopathy (26%), and selenium (24%) were cited most frequently. Most respondents (69%) were satisfied with the effects of complementary and alternative medicine. Use of complementary and alternative medicine was associated with religiosity, functional independence, female sex, white-collar job, and higher education ( P < 0.05). Compared with conventional therapies, complementary and alternative medicine rarely showed unwanted side effects (9% vs 59%, P < 0.00001). A total of 52% stated that the initial consultation with their physician lasted less than 15 min. To conclude, main reasons for the use of complementary and alternative medicine include the high rate of side effects and low levels of satisfaction with conventional treatments and brief patients/physicians contacts.

Canadian treatment optimization recommendations (TOR) as a predictor of disease breakthrough in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with interferon β-1a: analysis of the PRISMS study

Background

Early intervention with an effective disease-modifying drug (DMD) offers the best chance of limiting the inflammatory process that contributes to irreversible axonal damage correlating with disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). It is equally important to ascertain fairly quickly whether patients are responding positively to the choice of therapy to allow time for either a treatment modification or a switch in treatment, a process we termed “treatment optimization”. Various treatment optimization recommendations (TOR) have been proposed to help decide when a patient taking an MS DMD might be showing a sub-optimal response. We have applied the clinical scheme proposed by the Canadian TOR to the patients involved in the Prevention of Relapses and disability by Interferon Subcutaneously in MS 4-year (PRISMS-4) study, who received interferon β-1a treatment for 4 years, with the TOR applied retrospectively at year 1.

Objective

The aim of this investigation was to examine whether these TOR were able to predict which patients would go on to develop disease breakthrough (defined as any relapses or disease progression), indicative of a sub-optimal response over the ensuing 3 years of study and therefore might have benefited from a change in treatment.

Results

We found 39% of patients receiving therapy experienced either a medium or high level of concern of breakthrough after a year of treatment, and 89% of these patients went on to develop further breakthrough over years 2–4. Although 67% of the 61% of patients having no or low-level concern after a year of treatment also experienced further disease breakthrough, it was significantly less than the medium or high group.

Conclusion

This study shows that the Canadian TOR may be an important tool for early treatment optimization.

The search for a balance between short and long-term treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is a lifelong, immune-mediated progressive disorder. The early age of onset and the chronic nature of the disease with accumulation of physical disability, demand a long-term ("lifelong") management, including disease-modifying immunomodulatory therapies and symptomatic treatments. The ultimate goal in the long-term management of multiple sclerosis is to prevent or delay the appearance of permanent neurological disability. Due to improvements in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, it is now possible to initiate treatment early in the disease process. To this end, first-line immunomodulatory treatments such as glatiramer acetate and beta-interferons are available that reduce the rate of relapses and disease activity as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. However, the short duration of clinical trials provides little information about long-term changes in disability over time. In the case of glatiramer acetate, a long-term, openlabel extension of the pivotal trial has provided prospective data on systematic regular follow-up of all patients who had ever received the drug during the original trial or its extension. Of 232 patients analysed, 108 were still participating in the study an average of ten years after treatment was initiated. Despite the limitations of open-label trials, this study has provided some evidence for a sustained reduction in frequency and severity of relapses and in the rate of accrual of disability. Such long-term data, which demonstrate safety, tolerability and sustained clinical benefit, help improve patient care and may contribute to patients taking a more positive view of treatment. Effective immunomodulatory treatment needs comprehensive information and education of the patient to establish long-term adherence, a critical determinant of long-term outcome. A multidisciplinary approach through a health care team is the optimal strategy, with encouragement to continue the therapy.

[Subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a in the treatment of multiple sclerosis]

During the last 10 years recombinant interferon-beta-1a administered subcutaneously has been the subject of several clinical trials in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), in secondary progressive MS (SPMS), as well as in clinically isolated syndromes. All of them met the criteria of evidence level class I. Consistent evidence for moderate immunomodulatory effects on clinical parameters of disease activity was gained, and even higher efficacy of IFN-beta-1a sc. on MRI activity of multiple sclerosis was proven. Indirect evidence confirmed the hypothesis of a dose-response curve for IFN-beta-1a formulations in MS. The higher efficacy of IFN-beta-1a 44 microg sc. TIW, however, also includes more adverse events such as injection site reactions, flu-like symptoms and a moderate immunogenicity. Current evidence does not allow a recommendation of IFN-beta-1a sc. as most effective first line therapy, because also the individual patient's choice in the route of administration and long-term effects of neutralizing antibodies to IFN-beta-1a sc. must be taken into account. In the long-term, IFN-beta-1a showed a beneficial safety-tolerability profile with 50 % of patients sticking to the initial immunomodulatory treatment. There were no teratogenic effects, IFN-beta-1a sc. did not enhance depressive symptoms. Data on inhibition of the progression of disease, however, remained inconclusive. Probable beneficial effects of IFN-beta-1a sc. on cognitive function or "chronic fatigue" have not been investigated yet.

Multiple sclerosis registry in Germany: results of the extension phase 2005/2006

INTRODUCTION

In 2001, a nationwide multiple sclerosis (MS) registry was initiated in Germany under the auspices of the German MS Society, (DMSG Bundesverband e.V.). The project aimed at collecting epidemiological data and information on health care provision for MS patients in Germany.

METHODS

After a 2-year pilot phase, the original entry mask was modified, and new centers were recruited, resulting in the registration of a total of 5821 patients in 2005 and 2006. Following a 2 stage quality control process, standardized data sets for 5445 patients (93.5%) were able to be analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean duration from onset of disease to diagnosis was 3.5 years. More than 70% of patients received immunomodulatory drugs, whereas symptomatic treatments were less commonly administered. The number of participating centers as of 31 December 2006 was 57 (29 neurological hospitals, 11 rehabilitation units, 13 specialized practitioners, and 4 regional MS centers).

DISCUSSION

The MS registry provides valuable data on patterns of care for MS patients in Germany, and may help to improve service provision and overall quality of life for these patients.

[Fumaric acid and its esters in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: studies and effects]

The currently licensed medications for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are only partially effective and require a parenteral route of administration. Thus there is a need for new, preferably orally available therapeutics. Such a substance could be fumaric acid and its esters (FAE). These compounds are already in use for treatment of psoriasis and are known to have an immunomodulatory effect. In addition there is a potential for neuroprotective effects as suggested by in vitro studies and experiments in the animal model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. A phase II clinical study in RRMS patients with the modified fumaric acid ester BG-12 showed as "proof of principle" in a frequent MRI design that FAE significantly reduce the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions after 24 weeks of treatment. Further phase III studies have been started to explore the long-term efficacy of this substance. The results of these studies will show if FAE can be another treatment option, maybe for combination therapy, in patients with MS.

„Syndrom“ multiple Sklerose

Manifestation und Verlauf der multifaktoriell bedingten Erkrankung multiple Sklerose (MS) als häufigster neuroinflammatorischer/-degenerativer Erkrankung des Nervensystems unterliegen mannigfaltigen genetischen und Umwelteinflüssen. Differenzialdiagnostik und (symptomorientierte) Therapie bedürfen neben modernen technischen Hilfsmitteln des erfahrenen Neurologen, um andere chronische entzündlich-degenerative Prozesse auszuschließen bzw. die Behandlung optimal anzupassen. Bemühungen, den komplexen genetischen MS-Beitrag aufzuklären, zeigen Teilerfolge in vertiefter Kooperation zwischen Klinik und Grundlagenforschung.