[Hebephrenia - a viable psychopathological construct?]

One hundred and fifty years of hebephrenia. A review

INTRODUCTION

The publication of Hecker's article on hebephrenia in 1871 was a fundamental milestone for clinical psychiatry. Despite the initial recognition, many voices were raised against this diagnostic category and its limits were attenuated throughout the 20th century until its disappearance at the beginning of this century (along with the other subtypes of schizophrenia) in the DSM and ICD.

DISCUSSION

However, given the consistency of the clinical picture, there is the possibility of other criteria emerging that would lead its systematic study to continue or recommence. In this sense, the concepts of deficit schizophrenia, hebephrenia as a replacement for schizophrenia as a whole, and Leonhard's hebephrenias as systematic schizophrenias stand out. This article discusses the main diagnostic conflicts of the category of hebephrenia over time, with emphasis on the problems of recent decades.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of hebephrenia has begun to be revalued in recent years, and the concepts of deficit schizophrenia, of hebephrenia as a major category, and of systematic hebephrenias allow further investigation of this foundational picture of clinical psychiatry.

One Hundred and Fifty Years of Hebephrenia. A Review

INTRODUCTION

The publication of Hecker's article on hebephrenia in 1871 was a fundamental milestone for clinical psychiatry. Despite the initial recognition, many voices were raised against this diagnostic category and its limits were attenuated throughout the 20th century until its disappearance at the beginning of this century (along with the other subtypes of schizophrenia) in the DSM and ICD.

DISCUSSION

However, given the consistency of the clinical picture, there is the possibility of other criteria emerging that would lead its systematic study to continue or recommence. In this sense, the concepts of deficit schizophrenia, hebephrenia as a replacement for schizophrenia as a whole, and Leonhard's hebephrenias as systematic schizophrenias stand out. This article discusses the main diagnostic conflicts of the category of hebephrenia over time, with emphasis on the problems of recent decades.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of hebephrenia has begun to be revalued in recent years, and the concepts of deficit schizophrenia, of hebephrenia as a major category, and of systematic hebephrenias allow further investigation of this foundational picture of clinical psychiatry.

[Psychotic disorders in ICD-11: the revisions]

Psychotic disorders in ICD-11: the revisions Abstract. This article provides an overview of the main changes to the chapter "Schizophrenia or Other Primary Psychotic Disorders" (6A2) from ICD-10 to ICD-11 and compares them with the psychosis chapter of DSM-5. These changes include abandoning the classical subtypes of Schizophrenia as well as of the special significance of Schneider's first-rank symptoms, resulting in the general requirement of two key features (one must be a positive symptom) in the definition of "Schizophrenia" (6A20) and the allowance for bizarre contents in "Delusional Disorder" (6A24), which now includes "Induced Delusional Disorder" (F24). Further introduced are the focus on the current episode, the restriction of "Acute and Transient Psychotic Disorder" (6A23) to the former Polymorphic Disorder Without Schizophrenic Symptoms (F23.0), the diagnosis of delusional "Obsessive-Compulsive or Related Disorders" (6B2) exclusively as Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders, the specification of "Schizoaffective Disorder" (6A21), and the formulation of a distinct subchapter "Catatonia" (6A4) for the assessment of catatonic features in the context of several disorders. In analogy to DSM-5, ICD-11 now includes the optional category "Symptomatic Manifestations of Primary Psychotic Disorders" (6A25) for the dimensional quantification of symptoms. Again, developmental aspects remain unattended in in the ICD-11-definitions of psychotic disorders.