[Noninvasive protocol for surgical treatment of focal epilepsies]

Advances in Epilepsy Surgery

BACKGROUND

A large number of patients have epilepsy that is intractable and adversely affects a child's lifelong experience with addition societal burden that is disabling and expensive. The last two decades have seen a major explosion of new antiseizure medication options. Despite these advances, children with epilepsy continue to have intractable seizures. An option that has been long available but little used is epilepsy surgery to control intractable epilepsy.

METHODS

This article is a review of the literature as well as published opinions.

RESULTS

Epilepsy surgery in pediatrics is an underused modality to effectively treat children with epilepsy. Adverse effects of medication should be weighed against risks of surgery as well as risks of nonefficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss an approach to selecting the appropriate pediatric patient for consideration, a detailed evaluation including necessary evaluation, and the creation of an algorithm to approach patients with both generalized and focal epilepsy. We then discuss surgical options available including outcome data. New modalities are also addressed including high-frequency ultrasound and co-registration techniques including magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser therapy.

The Stereoelectroencephalography Methodology Applied to Epilepsies with a Visible Lesion

Resective epilepsy surgery relies on accurate preoperative localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), so presurgical evaluation is necessary to obtain the most accurate information from clinical, anatomic, and neurophysiologic aspects, with the ultimate goal of performing an individualized surgical treatment. The noninvasive methods of seizure localization are complementary and results must be interpreted in conjunction, in an attempt to compose localization hypotheses of the anatomic location of the EZ. Stereoelectroencephalography is an extraoperative invasive method that is applied in patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy in order to anatomically define the EZ and the related functional cortical areas.

The Stereo-Electroencephalography: The Epileptogenic Zone

The stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) methodology and technique was developed almost 60 years ago in Europe and it has proven its efficacy and safety over the last 55 years. The main advantage of the SEEG method is the possibility to study the epileptogenic neuronal network in its dynamic and tri-dimensional aspect, with an optimal time and space correlation with the clinical semiology. In this manuscript, the technical and methodological aspects of the SEEG will be discussed focusing on the planning of SEEG implantations, technical nuances, conceptualization of the epileptogenic zone, and the different methods of SEEG-guided surgical resections and ablations.

The Stereo-Electroencephalography Methodology

The stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) methodology and technique was developed almost 60 years ago in Europe. The efficacy and safety of SEEG has been proven. The main advantage is the possibility to study the epileptogenic neuronal network in its dynamic and 3-dimensional aspect, with optimal time and space correlation, with the clinical semiology of the patient's seizures. The main clinical challenge for the near future remains in the further refinement of specific selection criteria for the different methods of invasive monitoring, with the ultimate goal of comparing and validating the results (long-term seizure-free outcome) obtained from different methods of invasive monitoring.

Stereoelectroencephalography in children and adolescents with difficult-to-localize refractory focal epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Although stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has been shown to be a valuable tool for preoperative decision making in focal epilepsy, there are few reports addressing the utility and safety of SEEG methodology applied to children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To present the results of our early experience using SEEG in pediatric patients with difficult-to-localize epilepsy who were not considered candidates for subdural grid evaluation.

METHODS

Thirty children and adolescents with the diagnosis of medically refractory focal epilepsy (not considered ideal candidates for subdural grids and strip placement) underwent SEEG implantation. Demographics, electrophysiological localization of the hypothetical epileptogenic zone, complications, and seizure outcome after resections were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (60%) underwent resections after SEEG implantations. In patients who did not undergo resections (12 patients), reasons included failure to localize the epileptogenic zone (4 patients); multifocal epileptogenic zone (4 patients); epileptogenic zone located in eloquent cortex, preventing resection (3 patients); and improvement in seizures after the implantation (1 patient). In patients who subsequently underwent resections, 10 patients (55.5%) were seizure free (Engel class I) and 5 patients (27.7%) experienced seizure improvement (Engel class II or III) at the end of the follow-up period (mean, 25.9 months; range, 12 to 47 months). The complication rate in SEEG implantations was 3%.

CONCLUSION

The SEEG methodology is safe and should be considered in children/adolescents with difficult-to-localize epilepsy. When applied to highly complex and difficult-to-localize pediatric patients, SEEG may provide an additional opportunity for seizure freedom in association with a low morbidity rate.

[Epilepsy surgery]

Epilepsy surgery is an important therapeutic option for patients with epilepsy since one third of all epilepsy patients will still not be become seizure free despite newly developed antiepileptic drugs. Anterior temporal lobe resection is the most common procedure. Extratemporal resections require more complex diagnostics and often invasive evaluation which is not the case in most temporal epilepsy patients due to improved imaging (MRI, PET, SPECT). Electrical stimulation of the anterior thalamus has been available as a treatment option since last year.

The role of EEG in epilepsy: a critical review

Electroencephalography (EEG) is the most specific method to define epileptogenic cortex. Its sensitivity and specificity depend on several factors such as age and recording procedures, for example, sleep recordings and activation procedures (hyperventilation, photic stimulation). EEG reveals characteristic findings in several epilepsy syndromes. Rarely, epileptiform discharges are recorded in healthy, particularly young individuals. Ictal video/EEG recording is considered to be critical in localizing the epileptogenic zone. A careful analysis of the first clinical signs and symptoms of a seizure and of the evolution of the seizure symptomatology can provide important localizing clues. Although surface EEG recordings are less sensitive than invasive studies, they provide the best overview and, therefore, the most efficient way to define the approximate localization of the epileptogenic zone. Invasive recordings are used in patients in whom the epileptogenic zone either cannot be located with noninvasive diagnostic methods or is adjacent to eloquent cortex. The most commonly used invasive electrodes are stereotactically implanted depth electrodes and subdural strip or grid electrodes. Foramen ovale and epidural electrodes are of intermediate invasiveness, but less sensitive. Invasive electrodes are subject to sampling errors if misplaced and should be used only after exhaustive noninvasive evaluations have (1) failed to localize the epileptogenic zone and (2) led to a testable hypothesis regarding this localization. Invasive EEG studies are associated with additional risks that are justifiable only if there is a good chance of obtaining essential localizing information and on a potentially resectable area.

Epilepsy surgery: a critical review

The objective of surgical treatment of epilepsy is seizure control and improvement of quality-of-life of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Confirmation of the diagnosis of epilepsy and its medical intractability is the essential prerequisite for epilepsy surgery. After excluding nonepileptic events such as psychogenic pseudoseizures, the clinician must establish that adequate drug trials, including verification of compliance, have been performed. A careful diagnostic evaluation is mandatory to localize the epileptogenic zone. In this review we discuss the role of different diagnostic methods with respect to patient selection and surgical outcome. Furthermore, experimental approaches are mentioned and the reasons for failures of epilepsy surgery are critically discussed.

The Prognostic Value of [18F]FDG-PET in Nonrefractory Partial Epilepsy

PURPOSE

Regional abnormalities of cerebral glucose metabolism, as identified by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) have prognostic value regarding the outcome of epilepsy surgery in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. The value of FDG-PET abnormalities in nonrefractory patients has not been investigated systematically. This study examines whether FDG-PET could be used for early identification of nonrefractory epilepsy in patients who will become pharmacoresistant later during the course of their disease.

METHODS

We investigated interictal abnormalities of cerebral glucose metabolism by using FDG-PET in 125 consecutive patients with nonrefractory cryptogenic partial epilepsy and normal cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and we compared relative changes in seizure frequency in 90 patients after > or =2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Regional asymmetry of tracer distribution was seen in 43 of the 90 patients. Forty-one patients had regional glucose hypometabolism in the temporal and two patients in an extratemporal region. No difference between patients with and without a hypometabolic focus was found regarding seizure freedom after follow-up. This held true also for the subgroup of patients with epilepsy onset within 1 year before admission. Only patients with regional glucose metabolism showed an increase in seizure frequency. Multivariate analysis showed that only anticonvulsive treatment before index admission and the possibility of localizing the epileptogenic focus by using all available clinical and EEG data were independently associated with continuing seizures after a median follow-up period of 43 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional hypometabolism in FDG-PET is not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of successful anticonvulsant drug therapy in patients with nonrefractory partial epilepsy. Careful analysis of all routinely available clinical and neurophysiologic data has a much better predictive power to identify patients with medically refractory epilepsy early in the course of the disease. However, if PET data are available, they could help in identifying patients with a less benign course.

Usefulness of 3-D reconstructed images of the human cerebral cortex for localization of subdural electrodes in epilepsy surgery

Three-dimensional (3-D) images of 14 patients, in whom subdural electrodes were implanted for epilepsy surgery evaluation, were produced by fusing computerized tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance images (MRI) to determine the exact location of the electrodes. In 25% (198 of 806) of the subdural electrodes an exact location for resection strategy was not evident from the X-rays. The location of these electrodes ('doubtful location', DL) was compared to the 3-D images. Intraoperative inspection served as the gold standard. Concordance score was defined as good for 75-100% concordance, moderate for 50-75%, and poor for less than 50% concordance of the DL electrodes to the intraoperatively determined location. A comparative analysis of the 3-D images and X-ray films showed a highly significant difference (P < 0.0002) in favor of 3-D images. The concordance score for the DL electrodes in the 3-D images was good in 93% of the patients and moderate in 7%. In contrast, the concordance score was good in only 7% of the patients for the two-dimensional (2-D) skull films, moderate in 57%, and poor in 36%. Interobserver reliability was better for 3-D images (93%) than for the 2-D X-rays (43%). These findings suggest that 3-D images aid preoperative planning for resective epilepsy surgery.