1
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Colla Ruvolo C, Hoeh B, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Graefen M, Preisser F, Becker A, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after salvage radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:874945. [PMID: 36059656 PMCID: PMC9437357 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.874945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To test the effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). Material and methods We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER, 2004–2016) to identify SRP patients of all race/ethnicity background. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models addressed CSM according to race/ethnicity. Results Of 426 assessable SRP patients, Caucasians accounted for 299 (69.9%) vs. 68 (15.9%) African-Americans vs. 39 (9.1%) Hispanics vs. 20 (4.7%) Asians. At diagnosis, African-Americans (64 years) were younger than Caucasians (66 years), but not younger than Hispanics (66 years) and Asians (67 years). PSA at diagnosis was significantly higher in African-Americans (13.2 ng/ml), Hispanics (13.0 ng/ml), and Asians (12.2 ng/ml) than in Caucasians (7.8 ng/ml, p = 0.01). Moreover, the distribution of African-Americans (10.3%–36.6%) and Hispanics (0%–15.8%) varied according to SEER region. The 10-year CSM was 46.5% in African-Americans vs. 22.4% in Caucasians vs. 15.4% in Hispanics vs. 15.0% in Asians. After multivariate adjustment (for age, clinical T stage, lymph node dissection status), African-American race/ethnicity was an independent predictor of higher CSM (HR: 2.2, p < 0.01), but not Hispanic or Asian race/ethnicity. The independent effect of African-American race/ethnicity did not persist after further adjustment for PSA. Conclusion African-Americans treated with SRP are at higher risk of CSM than other racial/ethnic groups and also exhibited the highest baseline PSA. The independent effect of African-American race/ethnicity on higher CSM no longer applies after PSA adjustment since higher PSA represents a distinguishing feature in African-American patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Mike Wenzel,
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Colla Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czechia
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Graefen M, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of lymph node dissection on cancer-specific survival in salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Prostate 2021; 81:339-346. [PMID: 33666271 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that lymph node dissection (LND) at salvage radical prostatectomy may be associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and we tested this hypothesis. METHODS We relied on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (2004-2016) to identify all salvage radical prostatectomy patients. Categorical, as well as univariate and multivariate Cox regression models tested the effect of LND (LND performed vs. not), as well as at its extent (log-transformed lymph node count) on CSM. RESULTS Of 427 salvage radical prostatectomy patients, 120 (28.1%) underwent LND with a median lymph node count of 6 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-11). According to LND status, no significant or clinically meaningful differences were recorded in PSA at diagnosis, stage and biopsy Gleason score at diagnosis, except for age at prostate cancer diagnosis (LND performed 63 vs. 68 years LND not performed, p < .001). LND status (performed) was an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; p = .03). Similarly, lymph node count (log transformed) also independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.60; p = .01). After the 7th removed lymph node, the effect of CSM became marginal. The effect of N-stage on CSM could not be tested due to insufficient number of observations. CONCLUSIONS Salvage radical prostatectomy is rarely performed and LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is performed in a minority of patients. However, LND at salvage radical prostatectomy is associated with lower CSM. Moreover, LND extent also exerts a protective effect on CSM. These observations should be considered in salvage radical prostatectomy candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Graefen M, Becker A, Kluth LA, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Salvage Radical Prostatectomy: Baseline Prostate Cancer Characteristics and Survival Across SEER Registries. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e255-e263. [PMID: 33849813 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test for baseline prostate cancer characteristics and survival differences after salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) across 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries from 2004 to 2016. METHODS We tabulated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), cT stage, age, and SRP rates across individual SEER registries. Kaplan-Meier and competing risks regression methodologies depicted cancer-specific mortality and other cause mortality. Finally, overall mortality was compared with predicted life expectancy. RESULTS Overall, 428 SRP patients (2004-2016) were identified in the SEER database. Median follow-up duration was 74 months (interquartile range [IQR], 31-114). The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (IQR, 61-73 years) with a median PSA at diagnosis of 8.8 ng/mL (IQR, 5.4-18.6 ng/mL) and 10% cT3-4 stage (0%-23.8%). Variability existed across individual SEER registries regarding age, PSA, cT stage, and annual number of SRPs (0-17), as well as cumulative numbers of SRPs (7-73) between 2004 and 2016. At 10 years, cancer-specific mortality was 23.2% vs. other cause mortality 19.3%. Finally, SRP patients exhibited higher 10-year overall mortality (43.3%) than predicted by life tables (31.8%). CONCLUSION SRP is rarely performed. In most SEER registries, SRP use is very occasional. More than 2 average annual SRPs were reported in only 5 of all registries. Nonetheless, across all registries, SRP patients showed marginal to moderate differences in PSA, cT stage, and age at diagnosis. However, at 10 years of follow-up, 1 of 5 SRP patients died of other causes and observed overall mortality was higher than expected (36%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tx; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kranz J, Reiss PC, Salomon G, Steffens J, Fisch M, Rosenbaum CM. Differences in Recurrence Rate and De Novo Incontinence after Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicourethral Stenosis and Bladder Neck Stenosis. Front Surg 2017; 4:44. [PMID: 28848735 PMCID: PMC5554361 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the recurrence rate and de novo incontinence after endoscopic treatment of vesicourethral stenosis (VUS) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and for bladder neck stenosis (BNS) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods Retrospective analysis of patients treated endoscopically for VUS after RP or for BNS after TURP at three German tertiary care centers between March 2009 and June 2016. Investigated endpoints were recurrence rate and de novo incontinence. Chi-squared tests and t-tests were used to model the differences between groups. Results A total of 147 patients underwent endoscopic therapy for VUS (59.2%) or BNS (40.8%). Mean age was 68.3 years (range 44–86), mean follow-up 27.1 months (1–98). Mean time to recurrence after initial therapy was 23.9 months (1–156), mean time to recurrence after prior endoscopic therapy for VUS or BNS was 12.0 months (1–159). Patients treated for VUS underwent significantly more often radiotherapy prior to endoscopic treatment (33.3 vs. 13.3%; p = 0.006) and the recurrence rate was significantly higher (59.8 vs. 41.7%; p = 0.031). The overall success rate of TUR for VUS was 40.2%, success rate of TUR for BNS was 58.3%. TUR for BNS is significantly more successful (p = 0.031). The mean number of TUR for BNS vs. TUR for VUS in successful cases was 1.5 vs. 1.8, which was not significantly different. The rate of de novo incontinence was significantly higher in patients treated for VUS (13.8 vs. 1.7%; p = 0.011). After excluding those patients with radiotherapy prior to endoscopic treatment, the recurrence rate did not differ significantly between both groups (60.3% for VUS vs. 44.2% for BNS; p = 0.091), whereas the rate of de novo incontinence (13.8 for VUS vs. 0% for BNS; p = 0.005) stayed significantly higher in patients treated for VUS. Conclusion Most patients with BNS are successfully treated endoscopically. In patients with VUS, the success rate is lower. Both stenoses differ with respect to de novo incontinence. Patients must be counseled regarding the increased risk of de novo incontinence after endoscopic treatment of VUS, independent of prior radiotherapy. Longer follow-up is warranted to address long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kranz
- Department for Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Philipp C Reiss
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joachim Steffens
- Department for Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens M Rosenbaum
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matei DV, Ferro M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Renne G, Crisan N, Bottero D, Mazzarella C, Terracciano D, Autorino R, De Cobelli O. Salvage radical prostatectomy after external beam radiation therapy: a systematic review of current approaches. Urol Int 2015; 94:373-82. [PMID: 25765848 DOI: 10.1159/000371893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer patients. Despite this, the rate of intraprostatic relapses after primary EBRT is still not negligible. There is no consensus on the most appropriate management of these patients after EBRT failure. For these patients, local salvage therapy such as radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy may be indicated. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this review were to analyze the eligibility criteria for careful selection of appropriate patients and to evaluate the oncological results and complications for each method. METHODS A review of the literature was performed to identify studies of local salvage therapy for patients who had failed primary EBRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS Most studies demonstrated that local salvage therapy after EBRT may provide long-term local control in appropriately selected patients, although toxicity is often significant. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that for localized prostate cancer recurrence after EBRT, the selection of a local treatment modality should be made on a patient-by-patient basis. An improvement in selection criteria and an integrated definition of biochemical failure for all salvage methods are required to determine which provides the best oncological outcome and least comorbidity.
Collapse
|
6
|
Singla N, Singla AK. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management. Turk J Urol 2014; 40:1-8. [PMID: 26328137 PMCID: PMC4548645 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2014.222014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Urinary incontinence after prostatectomy or radiation is a devastating problem in men and remains the most feared complication following the treatment of localized prostate cancer. With an increasing number of radical prostatectomies performed globally for prostate cancer, the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life assumes an even greater importance. With the advent of male sling procedures, more men are now seeking treatment for incontinence. Since the introduction of the artificial urinary sphincter almost four decades ago, several surgical procedures have emerged to manage post-prostatectomy incontinence, including the male sling for milder forms of incontinence. Several of the newer procedures have shown promise in the United States; many others have been developed and utilized in other parts of the world, though they have not yet gained FDA approval in the United States. The present review seeks to illuminate the etiology, evaluation, and management of post-prostatectomy incontinence. An effort has been made to provide an algorithm to clinicians for appropriate surgical management. The surgical techniques of commonly performed procedures and their outcomes are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ajay K. Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel HRH, Amodeo A, Joseph JV. Salvage laparoscopic surgery in advanced prostate cancer: is it possible or beneficial? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 8:1509-13. [DOI: 10.1586/14737140.8.9.1509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
8
|
Alongi F, De Bari B, Campostrini F, Arcangeli S, Matei DV, Lopci E, Petralia G, Bellomi M, Chiti A, Magrini SM, Scorsetti M, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Salvage therapy of intraprostatic failure after radical external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013; 88:550-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2013] [Revised: 05/20/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
|
9
|
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Schmid H, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F, Heidenreich A. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2012.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
10
|
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Schmid H, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F, Heidenreich A. [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer]. Actas Urol Esp 2011; 35:565-79. [PMID: 21757258 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2011] [Accepted: 03/14/2011] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our aim is to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS The working panel performed a literature review of the new data emerging from 2007 to 2010. The guidelines were updated, and the levels of evidence (LEs) and/or grades of recommendation (GR) were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews. RESULTS Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists are the standard of care in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Although LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge, their clinical benefit remains to be determined. Complete androgen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5%. Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) results in equivalent oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in well-selected populations. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa, early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT. Relapse after local therapy is defined by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values > 0.2 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy (RP) and > 2 ng/ml above the nadir after radiation therapy (RT). Therapy for PSA relapse after RP includes salvage RT at PSA levels < 0.5 ng/ml and salvage RP or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in radiation failures. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) are of limited importance if the PSA is < 2.5 ng/ml; bone scans and CT can be omitted unless PSA is >20 ng/ml. Follow-up after ADT should include screening for the metabolic syndrome and an analysis of PSA and testosterone levels. Treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) includes second-line hormonal therapy, novel agents, and chemotherapy with docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) every 3 wk. Cabazitaxel as a second-line therapy for relapse after docetaxel might become a future option. Zoledronic acid and denusomab can be used in men with CRPC and osseous metastases to prevent skeletal-related complications. CONCLUSION The knowledge in the field of advanced, metastatic, and CRPC is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice. A full version is available at the EAU office or online at www.uroweb.org.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pfister D, Epplen R, Porres-Knoblauch D, Heidenreich A. Operative Korrekturmöglichkeiten der Anastomosenstriktur nach radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe A 2011; 50:1392-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2716-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
12
|
Ahallal Y, Shariat SF, Chade DC, Mazzola C, Reuter VE, Sandhu JS, Laudone VP, Touijer KA, Guillonneau BD. Pilot study of salvage laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer. BJU Int 2010; 108:724-8. [PMID: 21166755 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09924.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE • To evaluate feasibility, safety and oncological efficacy of salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pathology-proven biochemical recurrence after primary radiation therapy or cryotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS • This retrospective pilot study examined 15 patients from 2004 to 2010 with biochemical recurrence after external beam radiation therapy (N= 8), brachytherapy (N= 6) or cryotherapy (N= 1). • Patients were treated with salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (11 conventional, four robotic-assisted) with bilateral pelvic dissection. RESULTS • Median duration of surgery was 235 min. None of the following occurred: conversion to open surgery, transfusion, urethrovesical stenosis or perioperative or postoperative mortality. One patient presented with a rectal injury, repaired using uninterrupted sutures and a colostomy. One patient had anastomotic leak treated with prolonged Foley catheterization. • Pathological stage was pT2a in three, pT2b in three, pT3a in four, pT3b in three and pT4 in two patients; two patients had nodal metastasis. Within an 8-month median follow-up, 11 patients were disease-free and three had persistent postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation; the remaining patient experienced PSA recurrence after 21 months. • Seven patients achieved continence (no pads) by 8.4 months (median), one patient manifested severe incontinence corrected by implanting an artificial sphincter, and seven patients with a 12.6-month mean follow-up continued to need one or two pads per day. • Erectile dysfunction was present in five patients before surgery and in 14 patients after surgery. CONCLUSION • Salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to offer a safe therapeutic alternative for patients failing primary radiation or cryotherapy. However, larger studies with longer-term data are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youness Ahallal
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heidenreich A, Thüer D, Pfister D. [Locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy: radical salvage prostatectomy]. Urologe A 2010; 49:734-40. [PMID: 20237908 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-2064-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Radical salvage prostatectomy represents a secondary local treatment with curative intent in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer (PC) recurrences following radiation therapy. Preoperative risk factors predicting organ-confined disease are initial low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy, preoperative Gleason biopsy score<or=6, <or=50% biopsy cores involved with cancer, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time>12 months. Metastatic disease should be ruled out preoperatively by skeletal scintigraphy, abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and/or choline-PET/CT. Functionality of the lower urinary tract needs to be preoperatively evaluated by urethrocystoscopy and urodynamics. With appropriate patient selection, oncological control can be achieved in 80% of patients. A continence rate of 83%-96% depending on the type of previous radiation therapy is achievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dallinger B, Würnschimmel E. [Appearance of carcinosarcoma after radiotherapy for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Case report and review of the literature]. Urologe A 2010; 49:750-4. [PMID: 20237907 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-2217-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Carcinosarcoma of the prostate is an extremely rare tumor. In the case of rapid tumor progression, especially after radiation therapy to the pelvis or after hormone deprivation therapy because of prostate cancer, this tumor entity should be considered, and immediate histological confirmation is required. The only curative therapy is immediate radical surgical excision. We report about the first case of a carcinosarcoma after salvage radiation therapy for local recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate years after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Dallinger
- Urologische Abteilung, Krankenhaus Ried im Innkreis, Schlossberg 1, A-4910, Ried im Innkreis, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heidenreich A, Richter S, Thüer D, Pfister D. Prognostic Parameters, Complications, and Oncologic and Functional Outcome of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer after 21st-Century Radiotherapy. Eur Urol 2010; 57:437-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2008] [Accepted: 02/25/2009] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
16
|
Bailey DE, Wallace M. Critical review: is watchful waiting a viable management option for older men with prostate cancer? Am J Mens Health 2010; 1:18-28. [PMID: 19482780 DOI: 10.1177/1557988306294161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second-leading cause of death from cancer in U.S. men. For older men with early-stage prostate cancer, watchful waiting (also referred to as surveillance, expectant management, deferred/delayed therapy, or active monitoring) is a reasonable approach to aggressive therapy. The purpose of this article is to critically review published studies on the watchful waiting management option for prostate cancer within the past 5 years. The review of documented reports on watchful waiting reveals that there are both negative and positive indications toward watchful waiting. Further research is needed to change the perception of watchful waiting as a "do nothing" approach to the management of prostate cancer or a "death sentence" and to develop interventions that assist men to manage the uncertainty associated with living with prostate cancer to improve health and advance quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Bailey
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nuñez-Mora C, García-Mediero JM, Cabrera-Castillo PM. Radical Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy: Medium-Term Functional and Oncological Results. J Endourol 2009; 23:1301-5. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Nuñez-Mora
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Oncológico MD Anderson International España, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose M. García-Mediero
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Oncológico MD Anderson International España, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liatsikos E, Bynens B, Rabenalt R, Kallidonis P, Do M, Stolzenburg JU. Treatment of Patients after Failed High Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Salvage Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2008; 22:2295-8. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernard Bynens
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - Robert Rabenalt
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Minh Do
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Patients suffering from locally advanced prostate carcinoma are often stressed by debilitating local symptoms limiting their quality of life. At the same time life expectancy often exceeds several years, whereas urologists and oncologists tend to underestimate their patients' life expectancy. Cystoprostatectomy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma is a reasonable therapeutic option concerning frequency and kind of imminent complications and possibly alleviates or completely eliminates local symptoms in 80% or more. According to the literature cancer-specific 10-year survival rates are 38% or median cancer-specific survival lies between 24 and 31 months. The role of neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy has not yet been defined. Mostly after cystoprostatectomy due to locally advanced prostate carcinoma an ileal conduit is formed for urinary diversion, but also orthotopic neobladders or continent pouches are used. Incontinence rates for orthotopic neobladders may reach 50% and more. In synopsis cystoprostatectomy may be a viable therapeutic option for patients suffering from locally advanced prostate carcinoma. It surely is important that the indication for surgery is based on an individual decision.
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Tharp M, Hardacre M, Bennett R, Jones WT, Stuhldreher D, Vaught J. Prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy as salvage treatment of local failure after previous external or permanent seed irradiation for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2008; 7:231-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2007] [Revised: 03/24/2008] [Accepted: 03/26/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
22
|
van der Poel H, Moonen L, Horenblas S. Sequential treatment for recurrent localized prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97:377-82. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.20967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
23
|
Stolzenburg JU, Bynens B, Do M, Rabenalt R, Katsakiori PF, Liatsikos E. Salvage Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy After Failed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. Urology 2007; 70:956-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2007] [Revised: 04/28/2007] [Accepted: 06/26/2007] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
24
|
van der Poel HG, Beetsma DB, van Boven H, Horenblas S. Perineal Salvage Prostatectomy for Radiation Resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2007; 51:1565-71; discussion 1572. [PMID: 16949728 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2006] [Accepted: 08/08/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES No data are available on the use of perineal prostatectomy for salvage treatment of local recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Here we report on the clinical aspects and follow-up of salvage perineal prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-seven patients underwent a perineal salvage prostatectomy from 1997-2005 for biopsy-proven local recurrent prostate cancer after external beam (n=22) or brachyradiotherapy (n=5). Staging included physical examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and bone scan. RESULTS Mean PSA before surgery was 8.6 ng/ml (+/-2.8 ng/ml). Comparing clinical staging with final pathologic staging after salvage perineal prostatectomy showed a 67% clinical understaging. Mean blood loss was 677 cc, and perioperative morbidity consisted of prolonged anastomotic leakage (n=8), urosepsis (n=3), prolonged hematuria (n=3), urinary retention (n=2), and rectal perforation (n=1). One patient died during the postoperative course because of urosepsis and endocarditis. At an interval of at least 12 mo after surgery, 37% (10 of 27) and 7% (2 of 27) of patients reported normal continence and erectile function, respectively. Five patients died during a mean follow-up of 43 mo; two patients died of prostate cancer. Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 31% (95%CI, 25-42%). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis the serum PSA and PSA doubling time (PSADT) at the time of surgery were the best predictors of biochemical recurrence-free survival. No patient with a PSA>2 ng/ml and a PSADT<12 mo was without biochemical recurrence 2 yr after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Salvage perineal prostatectomy showed functional results that favorably compare with the retropubic approach, but considerable morbidity is still frequent. Proper patient selection therefore is mandatory. A serum PSA level of >2 ng/ml and PSADT<12 mo independently predict shorter biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following external beam radiation and interstitial radiation for prostate cancer, between 30% and 50% of the patients experience locoregional recurrence of their cancer. Although radical salvage prostatectomy is a secondary treatment option with curative intent, so far only a few hundred patients (<2%) worldwide have undergone this operation. The subject of this paper is a review of the world literature with reference to the frequency with this operation is performed and the technique, and also the prospects of success and possible complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS After radiotherapy, approximately 30% of biopsies are positive. Nonetheless, only 536 cases of salvage radical prostatectomy had been reported in the world literature up to 2005. The diagnosis of a local recurrence was always confirmed by rectal punch biopsy, pelvic CT and bone scintigraphy. Salvage radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing, with pelvic lymphadenectomy and, in some patients with cystectomy plus urinary diversion was the operative treatment applied. RESULTS Following secondary treatment after radiotherapy (RT), three parameters have been consistently identified as predictors of local failure: PSA nadir, time to nadir and PSA doubling time; clinical stage and type of first-line treatment are not helpful in predicting failure. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates are 77%, 71% and 28% for stages pT2, pT3a and pT3b/pN1, respectively. The success rate for salvage radical prostatectomy is thus similar to that for de novo radical prostatectomy for the same stages. In the past salvage radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy had a high complication rate. CONCLUSIONS A salvage radical prostatectomy with curative intent is a radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy also performed with curative intent. The reasons for the few literature reports of salvage RPX are: (1) oncological misgivings (too long a period of observation of PSA by the radiation oncologist/urologist; (2) misgivings to do with surgical technique, as the operation is technically challenging and involves a high risk of complications, especially incontinence. In recent times the comorbidity rate has become acceptable in cases in which the indications have been correctly observed. We believe that salvage prostatectomy should be considered only for patients in good general health whose life expectancy is over 10 years and who have recurrent cancer confirmed by punch biopsy 1 year or longer after the completion of radiotherapy and whose cancer was initially in an early (T1-2) clinical stage before their radiotherapy. Ideally, serum PSA should be less than 10 ng/ml both initially (before radiotherapy) and before salvage surgery. In addition, patients should be highly motivated and able to accept the surgical morbidity (50% incontinence rate).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Hautmann
- Urologische Universitätsklinik Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|