Die transurethrale Elektroresektion der Prostata durch Weiterbildungsassistenten

The state of TURP through a historical lens

In 1926 Maximilian Stern introduced a new instrument to treat obstructions at the vesical orifice and baptized it resectoscope. With reference to astonishing historical statements about the new instrument and surgical technique made by the pioneers and their critics we will value why transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for most men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement. TURP is currently challenged by recently introduced new instruments and techniques claiming advantages over TURP. However, TURP offers an excellent balance between high efficacy in symptom relieve and low morbidity along with low costs and favorable long term outcome compared to other treatment options. We will outline these arguments demonstrating that even after a century has elapsed, since its introduction into the urologists armamentarium, TURP continues to stand the passage of time.

Impact of resident involvement in endoscopic bladder cancer surgery on pathological outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) pathology specimens which lack muscle are associated with clinical upstaging and may necessitate repeat resections, potentially delaying curative treatment. This study evaluated whether resident involvement in TURBT is associated with suboptimal perioperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All TURBTs performed at a Canadian healthcare institution from November 2011 to June 2014 were reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between intraoperative resident involvement and TURBT muscle presence. Among high-risk patients (high grade, ≥ T1 or carcinoma in situ) who underwent cystectomy, time from TURBT to cystectomy was compared between resident and attending urologists with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In total, 463 TURBTs were identified. In multivariable analyses, residents were less likely to obtain muscle in specimens for all TURBTs [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.59, p = 0.03] and the subset of 275 high-risk TURBTs (aOR 0.41, p = 0.006). Among patients who underwent cystectomy, time to cystectomy was delayed by a median of 23 days when residents were involved in the initial high-risk TURBT compared with attending urologists only (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single academic center series, intraoperative resident involvement was associated with a decreased rate of muscle presence in TURBT specimens and a prolonged time to cystectomy.

The Effect of Resident Involvement on Perioperative Outcomes in Transurethral Urologic Surgeries

OBJECTIVE

To conduct the first study of intra- and postoperative outcomes related to intraoperative resident involvement in transurethral resection procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder cancer in a large, multi-institutional database.

DESIGN

Relying on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files (2005-2012), we abstracted all cases of endoscopic prostate surgery (EPS) for benign prostatic hyperplasia and transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBTs). Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the effect of trainee involvement (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-2: junior, PGY 3-4: senior, PGY ≥ 5: chief or fellow) vs attending only on operative time and length of hospital stay, as well as 30-day complication, reoperation, and readmission rates.

RESULTS

In all, 5093 EPS and 3059 TURBTs for a total of 8152 transurethral resection procedures were performed during the study period for which data on resident involvement were available. In multivariable analyses, resident involvement in EPS or TURBT was associated with increased odds of prolonged operative times and hospital readmissions in 30 days independent of resident level of training. Resident involvement was not associated with overall complications or reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement in lower urinary tract surgeries is associated with increased readmissions. Strategies to optimize resident teaching of these common urologic procedures in order to minimize possible risks to patients should be explored.