1
|
Nedogoda SV, Barykina IN, Salasyuk AS, Lutova VO, Popova EA. Individualisation of basal insulin therapy of type 2 diabetes: evidence from large randomized controlled trials. DIABETES MELLITUS 2022. [DOI: 10.14341/dm12774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Initiation of insulin therapy with basal insulin analogues has become the standard of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Timely administration of insulin allows not only to slow down the progression of type 2 diabetes, but also to reduce the frequency and severity of complications associated with it. This paper reviews the efficacy and safety of the use of the latest basal insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes from the perspective of current clinical guidelines, and also reviews updated data on the efficacy and safety of therapy by various members of the class. In this paper a review of the efficacy and safety of latest basal insulin analogues use in T2DM from the standpoint of current clinical guidelines has been carried out, and updated data on the efficacy and safety of therapy by various members of the class have been reviewed, taking into account their impact on the risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability. The available data indicate that insulin degludec 200 U/mL may be the drug of choice for those at high risk of developing severe forms of hypoglycemia. Since severe hypoglycemia and high glycemic variability are important risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality, it has been shown that a differentiated approach to insulin therapy in the treatment of T2DM is currently advisable, taking into account the effect on the risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kishor Sharma J, Sharma D, Gupta A. A glorious past, dynamic present and a promising future: Insulin at 100. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2022; 52:59-64. [DOI: 10.1177/14782715221088981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been 100 years since insulin was discovered. Insulin therapy remains the cornerstone for the management of diabetes. Advances in human physiology, pathology, molecular biology, biotechnology, biomedical engineering and devices have added tremendously to the journey of one of the greatest discoveries of modern medicine. Epidemiology of diabetes has gone through a major shift in a century; many oral drugs have been introduced for the management of type 2 diabetes; glucose monitoring has also gone through a sea change with the availability of novel parameters like continuous glucose monitoring, as has insulin delivery, with the availability of insulin pumps and the artificial pancreas. In this article, we look into historical facts, challenges, limitations and future developments of insulin therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amit Gupta
- Centre for Diabetes Care, Greater Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vargas-Uricoechea H, Aschner P. Comparative efficacy and safety of basal insulins: A review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021; 15:102318. [PMID: 34695771 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM To provide an update on the usefulness of basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS We conducted a literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE, BIOSIS, Scopus, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Springer Online Archives Collection until June 2021. RESULTS All basal insulins are similar in efficacy, with only small differences among them in terms of the risk of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS For type 2 diabetes mellitus, all basal insulins have a similar efficacy, with some advantage of Glar-300 and Deg-100 in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia compared to Glar-100.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea
- Director of Metabolic Diseases Study Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad del Cauca, Carrera 5 # 13N-36, Popayán, Cauca, Colombia.
| | - Pablo Aschner
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Research Advisor of the San Ignacio University Hospital and Scientific Director of the Colombian Diabetes Association, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blonde L, Bailey T, Sullivan SD, Freemantle N. Insulin glargine 300 units/mL for the treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes in the real world: A review of the DELIVER programme. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:1713-1721. [PMID: 33881797 PMCID: PMC8362061 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has shown that second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues, insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and insulin degludec (IDeg), provide similar glycaemic control, with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia compared with the first-generation BI analogue insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the highly selected participants and frequent follow-up of RCTs may not be truly representative of real-life clinical practice. It is important to assess the safety and effectiveness of these second-generation BI analogues in real-life clinical practice settings. The DELIVER programme utilized electronic healthcare records from the United States to compare clinical outcomes in people with T2D who received either Gla-300 or other BI analogues in real-world clinical practice. This review provides a concise overview of the results of the DELIVER studies. Overall, Gla-300 provided similar antihyperglycaemic effectiveness and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia versus the first-generation BI analogues Gla-100 and insulin detemir in people with T2D who had switched BIs. In those who were insulin-naïve, initiation with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was associated with significantly better antihyperglycaemic effectiveness and similar or lower hypoglycaemic risk. Both glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk were also shown to be similar with Gla-300 and IDeg, in people who had switched BIs and in those who were insulin-naïve. In addition, the DELIVER 2 study reported that people with T2D who switched to Gla-300 had reduced healthcare resource utilization, with an overall saving of US$1439 per person per year compared with those who switched to another BI analogue. Overall, the real-world DELIVER programme showed that the glycaemic control with a low risk of hypoglycaemia observed with Gla-300 in RCTs was also seen in standard clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Blonde
- Frank Riddick Diabetes Institute, Department of EndocrinologyOchsner Medical CenterNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | | | - Sean D. Sullivan
- The CHOICE Institute, School of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Danne
- Diabetes-Zentrum für Kinder and Jugendliche, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Jan Bolinder
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lefever E, Vliebergh J, Mathieu C. Improving the treatment of patients with diabetes using insulin analogues: current findings and future directions. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:155-169. [PMID: 33249944 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1856813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of insulin replacement in insulin-deficient people (type 1 diabetes, pancreatic causes of diabetes, long-standing type 2 diabetes) is to approximate the physiologic insulin action profile as closely as possible. However, short-acting human insulins start too slow and act too long, causing postprandial hyperglycemia and delayed hypoglycemia, while the insulin action profile of long-acting human insulins is too variable in duration and strength of action, leading to insufficient basal insulin covering and peak insulin levels after injection causing early nocturnal hypoglycemia. Insulin analogues were designed to overcome these shortcomings. In insulin-resistant people (type 2 diabetes), insulin analogues contribute to more efficient and safer insulin supplementation. Areas covered: In this review, we describe the unmet needs for insulin therapy, the currently available short- and long-acting insulin analogues and some considerations on cardiovascular outcomes, use in special populations, and cost-effectiveness. Finally, we discuss what is new in the field of insulin analogues. Expert opinion: The development of insulin analogues is an important step in diabetes treatment. Despite many patients meeting their glycemic targets with the newest analogues, hypoglycemic episodes remain a major problem. More physiologic insulin regimens, with glucose-sensitive or organ-targeting insulin analogues may be the answer to these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline Lefever
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joke Vliebergh
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Battelino T, Edelman SV, Nishimura R, Bergenstal RM. Comparison of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs: A Review of the Evidence from Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:20-30. [PMID: 32700970 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Many people with insulin-treated diabetes continue to experience inadequate glycemic control and a high incidence of hypoglycemic events, despite improvements in therapeutic strategies. While glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is currently recognized as the gold-standard for assessing glycemic control, the measure reflects mean blood glucose levels over a period of time, does not inform on acute glycemic deviations, and can be unreliable in certain populations. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) facilitates the acquisition of blood glucose data around the clock and, importantly, predicts and/or captures acute hyper- and hypoglycemic episodes. In light of the recent publication of the Time in Range (TIR) International Consensus Group report on key CGM metrics, we performed a review of current CGM evidence for second-generation basal insulins in both people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The identified studies highlight the varied CGM-related metrics used to assess basal insulins, which complicate comparisons. Furthermore, all studies had small sample sizes and typically were of short duration, which may account for the lack of statistically significant between-treatment differences observed. Differences were seen in the titration approaches used and the settings in which participants were observed. These results highlight the need for further studies of second-generation basal insulin analogs that are designed to capture the standard metrics proposed by the TIR consensus group, with additional consideration given to sample size and study duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadej Battelino
- UMC-University Children's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
D'Souza SC, Kruger DF. Considerations for Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Patients During Hospitalization: A Narrative Review of What We Need to Know in the Age of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:2775-2790. [PMID: 33000382 PMCID: PMC7526709 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00920-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
With the availability of second-generation basal insulin analogs, insulin degludec (100 and 200 units/ml [degludec]) and insulin glargine 300 units/ml (glargine U300), clinicians now have long-acting, efficacious treatment options with stable pharmacokinetic profiles and associated low risks of hypoglycemia that may be desirable for many patients with type 2 diabetes. In this narrative review, we summarize the current evidence on glycemic control in hospitalized patients and review the pharmacokinetic properties of degludec and glargine U300 in relation to the challenges these may pose during the hospitalization of patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving outpatient regimens involving these newer insulins. Their increased use in clinical practice requires that hospital healthcare professionals (HCPs) have appropriate protocols to transfer patients from these second-generation insulins to formulary insulin on admission, and ensure the safe discharge of patients and transition back to degludec or glargine U300. However, there is no guidance available on this. Based on the authors' clinical experience, we identify key issues to consider when arranging hospital care of such patients. We also summarize the limited available evidence on the potential utility of these second-generation basal insulin analogs in the non-critical inpatient setting and identify avenues for future research. To address current knowledge gaps, it is important that HCPs are educated about the differences between standard formulary insulins and second-generation insulins, and the importance of clear communication during patient transitions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ragonese M, Larosa M, Angotti S, Annese S, Cruciani L, Dainelli M, Lucisano G, Prosperini G, Sacco M, Salomone E, Saponara C, Semprini R, Rossi MC, Nicolucci A. Clinical Outcomes of Switching to Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml from Other Basal Insulins in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Italy: A Real-World Study. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11:2283-2298. [PMID: 32813262 PMCID: PMC7509008 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00902-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary aim was to provide real-world evidence of the outcomes after the switch to glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) from other basal insulins (first or second generation) in Italy. METHODS Multicenter, observational, retrospective study based on electronic medical records. RESULTS Overall, 953 T2DM insulin ± OAD treated people switched to Gla-300 or Gla-100 from January 2015 to July 2018. Three clinically relevant cohorts were identified: patients switching to Gla-300 from first-generation basal insulin (cohort 1), patients switching to Gla-300 from degludec-100 (Deg-100) (cohort 2), and those switching to Gla-100 from any basal insulin (cohort 3). The three cohorts differed in terms of age, diabetes duration, and metabolic control. HbA1c changes after 6 months from the switch were - 0.27% (95% CI - 0.38; - 0.16), - 0.06% (95% CI - 0.31; 0.19), and - 0.30% (95% CI - 0.51; - 0.09) in the three cohorts, respectively. FPG significantly decreased in cohort 1 (- 14.07 mg/dl, 95% CI - 20.25; - 7.89), while body weight significantly decreased in cohort 2 (- 1.47 kg, 95% CI - 2.55; - 0.39). Doses of insulin marginally changed during the follow-up (+ 0.89 U in basal insulin daily dose in cohort 1 and + 2.07 U in short-acting insulin daily dose in cohort 2). CONCLUSIONS Switching to Gla-300 from first-generation basal insulin in the real world is associated with improvements in metabolic control despite a suboptimal titration of both basal and short-acting insulins. Inertia in insulin titration documented in the Gla-100 cohort is also observed with the second-generation basal insulin. The switch to Gla-300 from Deg-100 was associated with a decrease in body weight of - 1.47 kg despite a slight increase in short-acting insulin daily doses of about + 2 U.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Lucisano
- CORESEARCH-Center for Outcome Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Prosperini
- CORESEARCH-Center for Outcome Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Michele Sacco
- CORESEARCH-Center for Outcome Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Maria Chiara Rossi
- CORESEARCH-Center for Outcome Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy
| | - Antonio Nicolucci
- CORESEARCH-Center for Outcome Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|