Does hospital admission risk for depression vary across social groups? A population-based register study of 231,629 middle-aged Finns

Socioeconomic position and mental health care use before and after first redeemed antidepressant and time until subsequent contact to psychologist or psychiatrists: a nationwide Danish follow-up study

PURPOSE

The purpose was to investigate inequalities in access to care among people with possible depression.

METHOD

In this nationwide register-based cohort study of 30,593 persons, we observed the association between socioeconomic position (SEP, education/income) and mental health care use (MHCU) four months before the date of first redeemed antidepressant (Index Date/ID) and 12 months afterwards-and time to contact to psychologist/psychiatrist (PP). Logistic, Poisson, and Cox regression models were used, adjusted for sex, age, cohabitation, and psychiatric comorbidity.

RESULTS

Before ID, high SEP was associated with less GP contact (general practitioner), higher odds ratios for GP-Mental Health Counseling (GP-MHC), psychologist contact, and admissions to hospital. This disparity decreased the following 12 months for GP-MHC but increased for contact to psychologist; same pattern was seen for rate of visits. However, the low-income group had more contact to private psychiatrist. For the 25,217 individuals with no MHCU before ID, higher educational level was associated with almost twice the rate of contact to PP the following 12 months; for the high-income group, the rate was 40% higher. 10% had contact to PP within 40 days after ID in the group with higher education; whereas, 10% of those with a short education would reach PP by day 120. High-income group had faster access as well.

CONCLUSION

Being in high SEP was positively associated with MHCU, before and after ID, and more rapid PP contact, most explicit when measured by education. Co-payment for psychologist may divert care towards private psychiatrist for low-income groups.

Association of Income With the Incidence Rates of First Psychiatric Hospital Admissions in Finland, 1996-2014

IMPORTANCE

The association between income and mental health has long been a question of interest. Nationwide register data provide means to examine trends and patterns of these associations.

OBJECTIVES

To compare income-specific trends in the incidence rates of first psychiatric hospital admissions and to evaluate whether an income gradient exists in the incidence rates at all levels of household income.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based open cohort study used linked registry data from nationwide Finnish Hospital Discharge and Statistics Finland population registers to determine annual incidence rates of first psychiatric hospital admissions. All Finnish citizens (N = 6 258 033) living in the country at any time from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2014, contributed to 96 184 614 person-years at risk of first inpatient treatment for mental disorders. The analyses were conducted from August 1, 2018, through September 30, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Equivalized disposable income, sex, age group, reduction in income decile in the previous 3 years, urbanicity, educational level, and living alone status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Annual percentage changes in the age-standardized incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs).

RESULTS

Altogether, 186 082 first psychiatric inpatient treatment episodes occurred (93 431 [50.2%] men), with overall age-standardized incidence rates per 1000 person-years varying from 1.59 (95% CI, 1.56-1.63) in 2014 to 2.11 (95% CI, 2.07-2.15) in 2008. In the highest income deciles, a continuous mean decrease per year of 3.71% (95% CI, 2.82%-4.59%) in men and 0.91% (95% CI, 0.01%-1.80%) in women occurred throughout the study period, in contrast to the lowest deciles, where the trends first increased (1.31% [95% CI, 0.62%-2.01%] increase in men from 1996 to 2007 and 5.61% [95% CI, 2.36%-8.96%] increase in women from 1996 to 2001). In the adult population, an income gradient was observed at all levels of household income: the lower the income decile, the higher the adjusted IRRs compared with the highest decile. The IRRs in the lowest decile varied from 2.94 (95% CI, 2.78-3.11) to 4.46 (95% CI, 4.17-4.76). In other age groups, the gradient did not persist at the highest income deciles. Diagnosis-specific income gradient was steepest in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, with estimated IRRs of the lowest income decile of 5.89 (95% CI, 5.77-6.02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, clear negative income gradient in the incidence rates of first hospital-treated mental disorders was observed in the adult population of Finland. These findings suggest that reduction in the use of inpatient care has not taken place equally between different income groups.

Predictors for clinical deterioration of mental state in patients assessed by telephone-based mental health triage

Patient safety research focussing on recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration is gaining momentum in generalist health, but has received little attention in mental health settings. The focus on early identification and prompt intervention for clinical deterioration enshrined in patient safety research is equally relevant to mental health, especially in triage and crisis care contexts, yet the knowledge gap in this area is substantial. The present study was a controlled cohort study (n = 817) that aimed to identify patient and service characteristics associated with clinical deterioration of mental state indicated by unplanned admission to an inpatient psychiatric unit following assessment by telephone-based mental health triage. The main objective of the research was to produce knowledge to improve understandings of mental deterioration that can be used to inform early detection, intervention, and prevention strategies at the point of triage. The results of the study found that the clinical profile of admitted patients was one of complexity and severity. Admitted patients were more likely to have had complex psychiatric histories with multiple psychiatric admissions, severe psychotic symptoms, a history of treatment non-adherence, and poorer social functioning than non-admitted patients.

Depression-related treatment and costs in Germany: Do they change with comorbidity? A claims data analysis

BACKGROUND

Existing diverse bottom-up estimations of direct costs associated with depression in Germany motivated a detailed patient-level analysis of depression-related treatment (DRT), -costs (DRC) and Comorbidity.

METHODS

A large sickness fund's claims data was used to retrospectively identify patients aged 18-65 years with new-onset depression treatment between January 1st and February 15th 2010, and follow them until December 31st 2010, describe DRT, estimate associated DRC, and predict DRC with a generalised linear model.

RESULTS

A total of 18,139 patients were analysed. Mean direct DRC were €783. Predictors of DRC regarding psychiatric comorbidities were: "Delusion, psychotic disorders and personality disorders" (DRC-ratio 1.72), "Alcohol/drug addiction" (1.82), "abuse of alcohol/drugs" (1.57). Predictors of DRC regarding medical comorbidities were: "Rheumatoid arthritis" (0.77), "atherosclerosis" (0.65), "pregnancy" (0.66), and "Osteoarthritis" (1.87). Of all patients, 60.8% received their most intense/specialised DRT from a general practitioner, a medical specialist (23.7%), a psychotherapist (8.0%), a medical specialist and psychotherapist (2.9%), or in hospital (4.6%). Serious psychiatric comorbidity nearly tripled depression-related hospitalisation rates.

LIMITATIONS

Seasonal affective disorder and missing psychiatric outpatient clinic data must be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimated DRC are significantly below the assessment of the German national guideline. Differing definitions of observation period and cost attribution might explain differing German DRC results. Signs of hospital psychiatric comorbidity bias indicate overestimation of hospital DRC. Identified associations of DRC with certain medical diseases in older adults warrant further research. Up to one quarter of patients with severe depression diagnosis might lack specialist treatment.

Socioeconomic Position and Antidepressant Use as Predictors of Coronary Heart Disease Mortality: A Population-Based Registry Study of 362,271 Finns

OBJECTIVE

The interplay between depression and socioeconomic position (SEP) in predicting cardiovascular outcomes has rarely been examined. We investigated whether SEP modified the effect of antidepressant use on coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality.

METHODS

The data consisted of an 11% random sample of the Finnish population aged 40 to 79 years at the end of 1999 with an oversample of 80% of those who died in 2000 to 2007. Participants free of CHD at baseline (n = 362,271) were followed up for CHD mortality in 2000 to 2007. SEP was assessed via registry-based information on education, occupational position, and income. Antidepressant use served as a proxy for depression and was derived from registry data on prescription medication purchases in the 5-year period preceding baseline. Age- and sex-adjusted Cox regression models with sampling weights were used.

RESULTS

Individuals with antidepressant purchases in any year 1995 to 1999 had a higher risk of CHD deaths (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.62-1.75) than did those without purchases. Basic level of education (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 2.01-2.17), blue-collar occupations (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.65-1.75), and the lowest income tertile (HR = 2.79, 95% CI = 2.69-2.91) were related to increased relative risks for CHD mortality. No significant (p < .05) interactions emerged between the SEP indicators and antidepressant purchases indicating that the effect of antidepressant use on the relative risk for CHD was similar across varying levels of SEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that in a country with tax-funded universal health care services, low SEP does not exacerbate the adverse effects of depression-as measured by antidepressant treatment-on cardiovascular health.

Predictors of admission and readmission to hospital for major depression: A community cohort study of 52,990 individuals

BACKGROUND

Our current knowledge about predictors of admission and re-admission to hospital as a result of major depressive disorder (MDD) is limited. Here we present a descriptive analysis of factors which are associated with MDD hospitalisations within a large population cohort.

METHODS

We linked participants of the Scottish Health Survey (SHS) to historical and prospective hospital admission data. We combined information from the SHS baseline interview and historical hospitalisations to define a range of exposure variables. The main outcomes of interest were: (1) first time admission for MDD occurring after the SHS interview; and (2) readmission for MDD. We used Cox regression to determine the association between each predictor and each outcome, after adjusting for age, gender and deprivation quintile.

RESULTS

52,990 adult SHS participants were included. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years per participant, we observed 530 first-time admissions for MDD. A relatively wide range of factors - encompassing social, individual health status, and lifestyle-related exposures - were associated with this outcome (p<0.05). Among the 530 participants exhibiting a de novo admission for MDD during follow-up, 118 were later re-admitted. Only older age (over 70) and a prior non-depression related psychiatric admission were associated with readmission for MDD.

LIMTATIONS

MDD was defined using records of International Classification of Disease hospital discharge codes rather than formal diagnostic assessments.

CONCLUSION

These findings have implications for mental health service organisation and delivery and should stimulate future research on predictive factors for admission and readmission in MDD.

Educational disparities in antipsychotic drug use among older people with and without dementia in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic drugs are commonly used to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. The aim was to investigate if socioeconomic position was associated with antipsychotic drug treatment among older adults with and without dementia.

METHOD

By record linkage of the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, Patient Register, and Educational Register, we obtained information on antipsychotics, dementia status, and educational level for 641,566 persons aged 75-89 year old in Sweden 2005.

RESULTS

Among persons diagnosed with dementia (n = 32 092), 21% used antipsychotics compared with 4% in the total sample (n = 641,566). Lower education was associated with a higher probability of antipsychotic use in the total sample (adjusted odds ratio [OR] low vs. high education: 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-1.64). In the dementia subpopulation, lower education was also associated with a higher likelihood of use of antipsychotics (adjusted OR(low vs. high) 1.43; 95% CI: 1.28-1.59).

CONCLUSION

People with dementia were five times more likely to use antipsychotic drugs than the general population of older adults. Also, lower education was associated with a higher use of antipsychotics, both in the general population and in the subgroup of persons with dementia. This finding highlights the importance of investigating healthcare inequalities also among cognitively impaired older adults.

Examining the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and mental health service use of immigrants in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

While newcomers are often disproportionately concentrated in disadvantaged areas, little attention is given to the effects of immigrants' postimmigration context on their mental health and care use. Intersectionality theory suggests that understanding the full impact of disadvantage requires considering the effects of interacting factors. This study assessed the inter-relationship between recent immigration status, living in deprived areas and service use for non-psychotic mental health disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

Matched population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada, where healthcare use data for 1999-2012 were linked to immigration data and area-based material deprivation scores.

PARTICIPANTS

Immigrants in urban Ontario, and their age-matched and sex-matched long-term residents (a group of Canadian-born or long-term immigrants, n=501,417 pairs).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

For immigrants and matched long-term residents, contact with primary care, psychiatric care and hospital care (emergency department visits or inpatient admissions) for non-psychotic mental health disorders was followed for 5 years and examined using conditional logistic regression models. Intersectionality was investigated by including a material deprivation quintile by immigrant status (immigrant vs long-term resident) interaction.

RESULTS

Recent immigrants in urban Ontario were more likely than long-term residents to live in most deprived quintiles (immigrants--males: 22.8%, females: 22.3%; long-term residents--both sexes: 13.1%, p<0.001). Living in more deprived circumstances was associated with greater use of mental health services, but increases were smaller for immigrants than for long-term residents. Immigrants used less mental health services than long-term residents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to existing research by suggesting that immigrant status and deprivation have a combined effect on recent immigrants' care use for non-psychotic mental health disorders. In settings where immigrants are over-represented in deprived areas, policymakers focused on increasing immigrants' access of mental health services should broadly address the influence of structural and cultural factors beyond the disadvantage.