1
|
Kasaai B, Thompson E, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Enrichment of core competencies to maximize health system impact: An analysis of an embedded research training program. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10399. [PMID: 38633024 PMCID: PMC11019376 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship is an embedded research training program that aims to prepare doctoral trainees and postdoctoral fellows for stronger career readiness and greater impact as emerging leaders within and beyond the academy, including in learning health systems (LHS). The program supports fellows to develop 10 leadership and research competencies that comprise the Enriched Core Competency Framework in Health Services and Policy Research through a combination of experiential learning, mentorship, and professional development training. This study tracks competency development of HSI fellows over time and examines fellows' perspectives on which program design elements support their competency development. Methods A competency assessment tool developed for the program was independently completed by 95 postdoctoral and 36 doctoral fellows (self-assessments) and their respective 203 dyad (academic and health system) supervisors in the 2017 to 2019 program cohorts, who independently rated the strength of fellows' 10 competencies at baseline and several points thereafter. Competency strength ratings were analyzed to understand change over time and differences in ratings across groups (between fellows' sex, supervisor type, and supervisor vs. fellow). Program design element ratings were examined to understand perspectives on their contribution toward fellows' competency development. Results Fellows' competency strength significantly improved in all 10 domains over time, based on independent assessments by the fellows and their dyad supervisors. Supervisors tended to rate the fellows' competency strength higher than the fellows did. Differences in competency ratings between male and female fellows (self-assessments) and between academic and health system supervisors were either negligble or not significant. Fellows identified all nine program design elements as enriching their competency development. Conclusion The HSI Fellowship provides an opportunity for fellows to develop the full suite of enriched core competencies and to prepare a cadre of emerging leaders with the skills and experience to contribute to the advancement of LHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahar Kasaai
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (IHSPR)TorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Erin Thompson
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (IHSPR)TorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (IHSPR)TorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)TorontoOntarioCanada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health SolutionsSt. Michael's HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
- Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Meghan McMahon
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (IHSPR)TorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chukwu OA, Nadigel J, Kasaai B, Boateng R, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Understanding the training, mentorship, and professional development priorities of early career embedded researchers. Int J Health Plann Manage 2024. [PMID: 38527109 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health systems are constantly evolving in response to existing and emerging health challenges and are increasingly adopting the Quintuple Aim to guide transformation and improvement efforts. Addressing health challenges and achieving the Quintuple Aim (enhancing patient experience, improving healthcare provider experience, promoting population health, optimising the value of healthcare services, and advancing health equity) may be enhanced with the use of a Learning Health Systems approach that fosters the real-time use of data and evidence to inform improvement efforts and harnesses embedded researchers to co-produce timely, relevant evidence to address priorities. Training programs have emerged to build embedded research capacity within health system organisations and have focused predominantly on the postdoctoral career stage, with little attention paid to the early career researcher (ECR) stage. The objective of this study was to understand ECR training and mentorship needs in the embedded research context to inform the creation new or adaptation of existing programs to build embedded ECR capacity. METHODS This study used a qualitative approach to garner insight from embedded and applied scholars and health systems leaders in Canada from various professional backgrounds and at various career stages using a combination of focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and an online survey. Thematic content analysis was used to examine the responses of study participants within the interview themes. RESULTS Twenty-six (26) participants were included in the study. Results were organised according to four key themes: (1) key competencies and skills needed by embedded ECRs; (2) additional training and capacity development needs; (3) training delivery approaches; and (4) enablers and challenges faced by embedded ECRs. Results highlight the importance of supporting ECRs to develop their leadership and organisational management capabilities; their knowledge of and ability to use research approaches that are well-suited to real-world, complex, evolving environments; and their opportunities to learn with and from each other and mentors. Results underscore the perceived importance of context, including being embedded in a supportive environment that values research and evidence and of academic incentives that recognise and value real-world research impact. The challenges of responding to shifting organisational and system priorities were identified. Additional insights from health systems leaders were also highlighted. CONCLUSION This study identified the multifaceted needs of embedded ECRs and the challenges they face within healthcare systems. Designing new programs or tailoring existing ones to address these needs would build their capacity, foster career progression, and ensure their impact as leaders of evidence-informed health system improvement which is crucial for achieving the Quintuple Aim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otuto Amarauche Chukwu
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Nadigel
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bahar Kasaai
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rhonda Boateng
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meghan McMahon
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shahaed H, Glazier RH, Anderson M, Barbazza E, Bos VLLC, Saunes IS, Auvinen J, Daneshvarfard M, Kiran T. Soins primaires pour tous: Le Canada peut s’inspirer de pays semblables ayant un niveau élevé de continuité relationnelle entre patientèle et centres de soins primaires. CMAJ 2024; 196:E359-E368. [PMID: 38499306 PMCID: PMC10948188 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221824-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Shahaed
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Michael Anderson
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Erica Barbazza
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Véronique L L C Bos
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Ingrid S Saunes
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Juha Auvinen
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Maryam Daneshvarfard
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande
| | - Tara Kiran
- Faculté de médecine Temerty (Shahaed) et Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Glazier, Kiran), Hôpital St. Michael, Université de Toronto; Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaines (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Institut du savoir Li Ka Shing, Hôpital St. Michael; Institut de recherche en services de santé (ICES Centre) (Glazier, Kiran); Institut des politiques de la gestion et de l'évaluation de la santé (Glazier, Kiran), Université de Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Département des politiques de la santé (Anderson), École londonienne d'économie et de sciences politiques, Londres, R.-U.; Département de santé publique et de médecine du travail (Barbazza, Bos), couverture sanitaire universelle (CSU) Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Pays-Bas; Grappe de recherche sur les services de santé (Saunes), Division des services de santé, Institut norvégien de santé publique, Oslo, Norvège; Unité de recherche sur la santé des populations (Auvinen), Université d'Oulu; Centre de recherches médicales (Auvinen), Hôpital universitaire d'Oulu et Université d'Oulu, Oulu, Finlande.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Premji K, Green ME, Glazier RH, Khan S, Schultz SE, Mathews M, Nastos S, Frymire E, Ryan BL. Characteristics of patients attached to near-retirement family physicians: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074120. [PMID: 38149429 PMCID: PMC10711930 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Population ageing is a global phenomenon. Resultant healthcare workforce shortages are anticipated. To ensure access to comprehensive primary care, which correlates with improved health outcomes, equity and costs, data to inform workforce planning are urgently needed. We examined the medical and social characteristics of patients attached to near-retirement comprehensive primary care physicians over time and explored the early-career and mid-career workforce's capacity to absorb these patients. DESIGN A serial cross-sectional population-based analysis using health administrative data. SETTING Ontario, Canada, where most comprehensive primary care is delivered by family physicians (FPs) under universal insurance. PARTICIPANTS All insured Ontario residents at three time points: 2008 (12 936 360), 2013 (13 447 365) and 2019 (14 388 566) and all Ontario physicians who billed primary care services (2008: 11 566; 2013: 12 693; 2019: 15 054). OUTCOME MEASURES The number, proportion and health and social characteristics of patients attached to near-retirement age comprehensive FPs over time; the number, proportion and characteristics of near-retirement age comprehensive FPs over time. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The characteristics of patients and their early-career and mid-career comprehensive FPs. RESULTS Patient attachment to comprehensive FPs increased over time. The overall FP workforce grew, but the proportion practicing comprehensiveness declined (2008: 77.2%, 2019: 70.7%). Over time, an increasing proportion of the comprehensive FP workforce was near retirement age. Correspondingly, an increasing proportion of patients were attached to near-retirement physicians. By 2019, 13.9% of comprehensive FPs were 65 years or older, corresponding to 1 695 126 (14.8%) patients. Mean patient age increased, and all physicians served markedly increasing numbers of medically and socially complex patients. CONCLUSIONS The primary care sector faces capacity challenges as both patients and physicians age and fewer physicians practice comprehensiveness. Nearly 15% (1.7 million) of Ontarians may lose their comprehensive FP to retirement between 2019 and 2025. To serve a growing, increasingly complex population, innovative solutions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Premji
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E Green
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shahriar Khan
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan E Schultz
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Mathews
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steve Nastos
- Economics, Policy & Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eliot Frymire
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bridget L Ryan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shahaed H, Glazier RH, Anderson M, Barbazza E, Bos VLLC, Saunes IS, Auvinen J, Daneshvarfard M, Kiran T. Primary care for all: lessons for Canada from peer countries with high primary care attachment. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1628-E1636. [PMID: 38049161 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Shahaed
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Michael Anderson
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Erica Barbazza
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Véronique L L C Bos
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Ingrid S Saunes
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Juha Auvinen
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Maryam Daneshvarfard
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tara Kiran
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Shahaed), and Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Daneshvarfard, Kiran), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; ICES Central (Glazier, Kiran); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Policy (Anderson), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Department of Public and Occupational Health (Barbazza, Bos), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cluster for Health Services Research (Saunes), Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Research Unit of Population Health (Auvinen), University of Oulu; Medical Research Center (Auvinen), Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lapointe-Shaw L, Salahub C, Austin PC, Bai L, Bhatia RS, Bird C, Glazier RH, Hedden L, Ivers NM, Martin D, Shuldiner J, Spithoff S, Tadrous M, Kiran T. Virtual Visits With Own Family Physician vs Outside Family Physician and Emergency Department Use. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2349452. [PMID: 38150254 PMCID: PMC10753397 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Virtual visits became more common after the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unclear in what context they are best used. Objective To investigate whether there was a difference in subsequent emergency department use between patients who had a virtual visit with their own family physician vs those who had virtual visits with an outside physician. Design, Setting, and Participants This propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted among all Ontario residents attached to a family physician as of April 1, 2021, who had a virtual family physician visit in the subsequent year (to March 31, 2022). Exposure The type of virtual family physician visit, with own or outside physician, was determined. In a secondary analysis, own physician visits were compared with visits with a physician working in direct-to-consumer telemedicine. Main Outcome and Measure The primary outcome was an emergency department visit within 7 days after the virtual visit. Results Among 5 229 240 Ontario residents with a family physician and virtual visit, 4 173 869 patients (79.8%) had a virtual encounter with their own physician (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [21.5] years; 2 420 712 females [58.0%]) and 1 055 371 patients (20.2%) had an encounter with an outside physician (mean [SD] age, 41.8 [20.9] years; 605 614 females [57.4%]). In the matched cohort of 1 885 966 patients, those who saw an outside physician were 66% more likely to visit an emergency department within 7 days than those who had a virtual visit with their own physician (30 748 of 942 983 patients [3.3%] vs 18 519 of 942 983 patients [2.0%]; risk difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.3%]; relative risk, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.63-1.69]). The increase in the risk of emergency department visits was greater when comparing 30 216 patients with definite direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits with 30 216 patients with own physician visits (risk difference, 4.1% [95% CI, 3.8%-4.5%]; relative risk, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.74-3.27]). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, patients whose virtual visit was with an outside physician were more likely to visit an emergency department in the next 7 days than those whose virtual visit was with their own family physician. These findings suggest that primary care virtual visits may be best used within an existing clinical relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Health Network and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Peter C. Austin
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Li Bai
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R. Sacha Bhatia
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Richard H. Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Noah M. Ivers
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Martin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Shuldiner
- Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheryl Spithoff
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Kiran
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rudoler D, Austin N, Allin S, Bjerre LM, Dolovich L, Glazier RH, Grudniewicz A, Laporte A, Martin E, Schultz S, Sirois C, Strumpf E. The impact of team-based primary care on medication-related outcomes in older adults: A comparative analysis of two Canadian provinces. Prev Med Rep 2023; 36:102512. [PMID: 38116285 PMCID: PMC10728440 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate if access to team-based primary care is related to medication management outcomes for older adults. Methods We completed two retrospective cohort studies using administrative health data for older adults (66+) in Ontario (n = 428,852) and Québec (n = 310,198) who were rostered with a family physician (FP) between the 2001/02 and 2017/18 fiscal years. We generated matched comparison groups of older adults rostered to an FP practicing in a team-based model, and older adults rostered to an FP in a non-team model. We compared the following outcomes between these groups: any adverse drug reactions (ADRs), any potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP), and polypharmacy. Average treatment effects of access to team-based care were estimated using a difference-in-differences estimator. Results The risk of an ADR was 22 % higher (RR = 1.22, 95 % CI = 1.18, 1.26) for older adults rostered to a team-based FP in Québec and 6 % lower (RR = 0.943, 95 % CI = 0.907, 0.978) in Ontario. However, absolute risk differences were less than 0.5 %. Differences in the risk of polypharmacy were small in Québec (RR = 1.005, 95 % CI = 1.001, 1.009) and Ontario (RR = 1.004, 95 % CI = 1.001, 1.007) and had absolute risk differences of less than 1 % in both provinces. Effects on PIP were not statistically or clinically significant in adjusted models. Interpretation We did not find evidence that access to team-based primary care in Ontario or Québec meaningfully improved medication management outcomes for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rudoler
- Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nichole Austin
- School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Sara Allin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lise M. Bjerre
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Audrey Laporte
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Health Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Martin
- Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Sirois
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Erin Strumpf
- Canadian Centre for Health Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Economics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McDonald T, Schultz SE, Green LA, Lethebe BC, Glazier RH. Family physician count and service provision in Ontario and Alberta between 2005/06 and 2017/18: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E1102-E1108. [PMID: 38016759 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Five million Canadians lack a family doctor or primary care team. Our goal was to examine trends over time in family physician workforce and service provision in Ontario and Alberta, with a view to informing policy discussions on primary care supply and delivery of services. METHODS We used cross-sectional analyses in Ontario and Alberta for 2005/06, 2012/13 and 2017/18 to examine family physician provision of service days by provider demographic characteristics and geographic location. A service day was defined as 10 or more clinic visits worth $20 or more on the same calendar day. We included all active family physicians who had evidence of billing in each fiscal year analyzed. RESULTS From 2005/06 to 2017/18, the number of family physicians increased by 35.3% in Ontario and 48.7% in Alberta; however, annual average service days per physician declined by 10.6% in Ontario and 5.9% in Alberta. The average daily patient volume remained stable in Ontario and declined in Alberta, and services per population kept pace modestly with population growth in both provinces. Rural areas had the smallest increases in physician counts and largest declines in average annual service days per physician. Physicians in both provinces who had graduated from medical school at least 30 years earlier accounted for more than one-third of the workforce in 2017/18. INTERPRETATION Ontario and Alberta experienced rapid growth in the number of family physicians, with the largest increases among those in late career and the lowest increases in rural areas. The decline in service provision among physicians overall and in subgroups in both provinces highlights the importance of measuring activity to inform workforce planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terrence McDonald
- Department of Family Medicine (McDonald), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; ICES Central (Schultz, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Green, Lethebe), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Clinical Research Unit (Lethebe), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Susan E Schultz
- Department of Family Medicine (McDonald), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; ICES Central (Schultz, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Green, Lethebe), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Clinical Research Unit (Lethebe), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Lee A Green
- Department of Family Medicine (McDonald), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; ICES Central (Schultz, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Green, Lethebe), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Clinical Research Unit (Lethebe), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Brendan Cord Lethebe
- Department of Family Medicine (McDonald), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; ICES Central (Schultz, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Green, Lethebe), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Clinical Research Unit (Lethebe), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family Medicine (McDonald), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; ICES Central (Schultz, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Green, Lethebe), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Clinical Research Unit (Lethebe), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lofters AK, Wu F, Frymire E, Kiran T, Vahabi M, Green ME, Glazier RH. Cancer Screening Disparities Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2343796. [PMID: 37983033 PMCID: PMC10660460 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening disparities existed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is unclear whether those have changed since the pandemic. Objective To assess whether changes in screening from before the pandemic to after the pandemic varied for immigrants and for people with limited income. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based, cross-sectional study, using data from March 31, 2019, and March 31, 2022, included adults in Ontario, Canada, the country's most populous province, with more than 14 million people, almost 30% of whom are immigrants. At both dates, the screening-eligible population for each cancer type was assessed. Exposures Neighborhood income quintile, immigrant status, and primary care model type. Main Outcomes and Measures For each cancer screening type, the main outcome was whether the screening-eligible population was up to date on screening (a binary outcome) on March 31, 2019, and March 31, 2022. Up to date on screening was defined as having had a mammogram in the previous 2 years, a Papanicolaou test in the previous 3 years, and a fecal test in the previous 2 years or a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the previous 10 years. Results The overall cohort on March 31, 2019, included 1 666 943 women (100%) eligible for breast screening (mean [SD] age, 59.9 [5.1] years), 3 918 225 women (100%) eligible for cervical screening (mean [SD] age, 45.5 [13.2] years), and 3 886 345 people eligible for colorectal screening (51.4% female; mean [SD] age, 61.8 [6.4] years). The proportion of people up to date on screening in Ontario decreased for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, with the largest decrease for breast screening (from 61.1% before the pandemic to 51.7% [difference, -9.4 percentage points]) and the smallest decrease for colorectal screening (from 65.9% to 62.0% [difference, -3.9 percentage points]). Preexisting disparities in screening for people living in low-income neighborhoods and for immigrants widened for breast screening and colorectal screening. For breast screening, compared with income quintile 5 (highest), the β estimate for income quintile 1 (lowest) was -1.16 (95% CI, -1.56 to -0.77); for immigrant vs nonimmigrant, the β estimate was -1.51 (95% CI, -1.84 to -1.18). For colorectal screening, compared with income quintile 5, the β estimate for quntile 1 was -1.29 (95% CI, 16 -1.53 to -1.06); for immigrant vs nonimmigrant, the β estimate was -1.41 (95% CI, -1.61 to -1.21). The lowest screening rates both before and after the COVID-19 pandemic were for people who had no identifiable family physician (eg, moving from 11.3% in 2019 to 9.6% in 2022 up to date for breast cancer). In addition, patients of interprofessional, team-based primary care models had significantly smaller reductions in β estimates for breast (2.14 [95% CI, 1.79 to 2.49]), cervical (1.72 [95% CI, 1.46 to 1.98]), and colorectal (2.15 [95% CI, 1.95 to 2.36]) postpandemic screening and higher uptake of screening in general compared with patients of other primary care models. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study in Ontario that included 2 time points, widening disparities before compared with after the COVID-19 pandemic were found for breast cancer and colorectal cancer screening based on income and immigrant status, but smaller declines in disparities were found among patients of interprofessional, team-based primary care models than among their counterparts. Policy makers should investigate the value of prioritizing and investing in improving access to team-based primary care for people who are immigrants and/or with limited income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha K. Lofters
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Eliot Frymire
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Queen’s, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Kiran
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mandana Vahabi
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E. Green
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Queen’s, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bayoumi I, Glazier RH, Jaakkimainen L, Premji K, Kiran T, Frymire E, Khan S, Green ME. Trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario, 2008-2018: an interrupted time-series analysis. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E809-E819. [PMID: 37669813 PMCID: PMC10482493 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attachment to a regular primary care provider is associated with better health outcomes, but 15% of people in Canada lack a consistent source of ongoing primary care. We sought to evaluate trends in attachment to a primary care provider in Ontario in 2008-2018, through an equity lens and in relation to policy changes in implementation of payment reforms and team-based care. METHODS Using linked, population-level administrative data, we conducted a retrospective observational study to calculate rates of patients attached to a regular primary care provider from Apr. 1, 2008, to Mar. 31, 2019. We evaluated the association of patient characteristics and attachment in 2018 using sex-stratified, adjusted, multivariable logistic regression models and used segmented piecewise regression to evaluate changing trends before and after implementation of a policy that restricted physician entry to alternate models. RESULTS Attachment increased from 80.5% (n = 10 352 385) in 2008 to 88.9% of the population (n = 12 537 172) in 2018, but was lower among people with low comorbidity, high residential instability, material deprivation, rural residence and recent immigrants. Inequities narrowed for recent immigrants, males and people with lower incomes over the study period, but disparities persisted for these groups. Attachment grew by 1.47% annually until 2014 (p < 0.0001), but was stagnant thereafter (annual percent change of 0.13, p = 0.16). INTERPRETATION Lack of sustained progress in attachment followed reduced levels of physician entry to alternate funding models. Although disparities narrowed for many groups over the study period, persistent gaps remained for immigrants and people with lower incomes; targeted interventions and policy changes are needed to address these persistent gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imaan Bayoumi
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Liisa Jaakkimainen
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Kamila Premji
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Tara Kiran
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Eliot Frymire
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Shahriar Khan
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| | - Michael E Green
- Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University; ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Frymire, Khan, Green), Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Glazier, Jaakkimainen, Premji, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Frymire, Khan, Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Felfeli T, Katsnelson G, Kiss A, Plumptre L, Paterson JM, Ballios BG, Mandelcorn ED, Glazier RH, Brent MH, Wong DT. Prevalence and predictors for being unscreened for diabetic retinopathy: a population-based study over a decade. Can J Ophthalmol 2023; 58:278-286. [PMID: 35577027 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the population-level predictors for being unscreened for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among individuals with diabetes in a developed country. DESIGN A retrospective population-based repeated-cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS All individuals with diabetes (types 1 and 2) aged ≥20 years in the universal health care system in Ontario were identified in the 2011-2013 and 2017-2019 time periods. METHODS The Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the relative risk (RR) comparison of subcategories stratified by the 2 cross-sectional time periods. RESULTS A total of 1 145 645 and 1 346 578 individuals with diabetes were identified in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively. The proportion of patients unscreened for DR declined very slightly from 35% (n = 405 967) in 2011-2013 to 34% (n = 455 027) in 2017-2019 of the population with diabetes (RR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.964-0.9693; p < 0.0001). Young adults aged 20-39 years of age had the highest proportion of unscreened patients (62% and 58% in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively). Additionally, those who had a lower income quintile (RR = 1.039; 95% CI, 1.036-1.044; p < 0.0001), were recent immigrants (RR = 1.286; 95% CI, 1.280-1.293; p < 0.0001), lived in urban areas (RR = 1.149; 95% CI, 1.145-1.154; p < 0.0001), had a mental health history (RR = 1.117; 95% CI, 1.112-1.122; p < 0.0001), or lacked a connection to a primary care provider (RR = 1.656; 95% CI, 1.644-1.668; p < 0.0001) had a higher risk of being unscreened. CONCLUSIONS This population-based study suggests that over 1 decade, 33% of individuals with diabetes are unscreened for DR, and young age, low income, immigration, residing in a large city, mental health illness, and no primary care access are the main predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Felfeli
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; ICES, Toronto, ON.
| | | | - Alex Kiss
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; ICES, Toronto, ON; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | | | - J Michael Paterson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; ICES, Toronto, ON
| | - Brian G Ballios
- Department of Ophthalmology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON; Department of Ophthalmology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Efrem D Mandelcorn
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Ophthalmology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; ICES, Toronto, ON; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Michael H Brent
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Ophthalmology, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | - David T Wong
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of Ophthalmology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lavergne MR, Rudoler D, Peterson S, Stock D, Taylor C, Wilton AS, Wong ST, Scott I, McGrail KM, McCracken RK, Marshall EG, MacKenzie A, Katz A, Jamieson M, Hedden L, Grudniewicz A, Goldsmith LJ, Glazier RH, Burge F, Blackie D. Changes in comprehensiveness of services delivered by Canadian family physicians: Analysis of population-based linked data in 4 provinces. Can Fam Physician 2023; 69:550-556. [PMID: 37582603 PMCID: PMC10426375 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6908550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe changes in the comprehensiveness of services delivered by family physicians across service settings and service areas in 4 Canadian provinces, to identify which settings and areas have changed the most, and to compare the magnitude of changes by physician characteristics. DESIGN Descriptive analysis of province-wide, population-based billing data linked to population and physician registries. SETTING British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. PARTICIPANTS Family physicians registered to practise in the 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 fiscal years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Comprehensiveness was measured across 7 service settings (home care, long-term care, emergency departments, hospitals, obstetric care, surgical assistance, anesthesiology) and in 7 service areas consistent with office-based practice (prenatal and postnatal care, Papanicolaou testing, mental health, substance use, cancer care, minor surgery, palliative home visits). The proportion of physicians with activity in each setting and area are reported and the average number of service settings and areas by physician characteristics is described (years in practice, sex, urban or rural practice setting, and location of medical degree training). RESULTS Declines in comprehensiveness were observed across all provinces studied. Declines were greater for comprehensiveness of settings than for areas consistent with office-based practice. Changes were observed across all physician characteristics. On average across provinces, declines in the number of service settings and service areas were highest among physicians in practice 20 years or longer, male physicians, and physicians practising in urban areas. CONCLUSION Declining comprehensiveness was observed across all physician characteristics, pointing to changes in the practice and policy contexts in which all family physicians work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ruth Lavergne
- Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS, and holds a Tier II Canada Research Chair in Primary Care.
| | - David Rudoler
- Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Ontario Tech University in Oshawa and Research Chair at the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences in Whitby
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Research analyst in the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver
| | - David Stock
- Senior health services researcher in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University
| | - Carole Taylor
- Data analyst in the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg
| | | | - Sabrina T Wong
- Senior investigator with the Division of Intramural Research of the National Institute of Nursing Research
| | - Ian Scott
- Associate Professor in the Department of Family Practice and Director of the Centre for Health Education Scholarship at the University of British Columbia
| | - Kimberlyn M McGrail
- Professor in the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research at the University of British Columbia
| | - Rita K McCracken
- Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia
| | - Emily Gard Marshall
- Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Primary Care Research Unit at Dalhousie University and with the Nova Scotia Health Authority
| | - Adrian MacKenzie
- Project executive for Health Workforce Planning with the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, co-Investigator with the WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning and Research, Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Community Health and Epidemiology at Dalhousie University, and an affiliate scientist with Nova Scotia Health
| | - Alan Katz
- Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Community Health Sciences at the University of Manitoba
| | - Margaret Jamieson
- Doctoral candidate in the Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, BC
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Associate Professor in the Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa
| | - Laurie J Goldsmith
- Adjunct Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser and the founder and Principal of GoldQual Consulting
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Senior core scientist with ICES, a Professor of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, and a family physician and scientist at St Michael's Hospital
| | - Fred Burge
- Professor and a faculty researcher in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University
| | - Doug Blackie
- Associate Faculty member at the School of Leadership Studies, Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC and a certified health care consultant
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wanigaratne S, Rayner J, Glazier RH, Stukel TA, Lu H, Gandhi S, Saunders NR, Hynie M, Kilibarda A, Guttmann A. Primary health care utilization in the first year after arrival by refugee sponsorship model in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287437. [PMID: 37494409 PMCID: PMC10370760 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Canada's approach to refugee resettlement includes government sponsorship, a pioneering private sponsorship model and a third blended approach. Refugees are selected and supported differently in each approach including healthcare navigation. Little is known about how well private sponsors facilitate primary care navigation and whether this changed during the large-scale 2015 Syrian resettlement initiative characterized by civic and healthcare systems engagement. METHODS AND FINDINGS Population-based cohort study of resettled refugees arriving in Ontario between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2017, with one-year follow-up, using linked health and demographic administrative databases. We evaluated associations of resettlement model (GARs, Privately Sponsored Refugees [PSRs], and Blended-Visa Office Referred [BVORs]) by era of arrival (pre-Syrian and Syrian era) and by country cohort, on measures of primary care (PC) navigation using adjusted Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. There were 34,591 (pre-Syrian) and 24,757 (Syrian era) resettled refugees, approximately half of whom were GARs. Compared with the reference group pre-Syrian era PSRs, Syrian PSRs had slightly earlier PC visits (mean = 116 days [SD = 90]) (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] = 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.23). Syrian GARs (mean = 72 days [SD = 65]) and BVORs (mean = 73 days [SD = 76]) had their first PC visit sooner than pre-Syrian era PSRs (mean = 149 days [SD = 86]), with respective aHRs 2.27, 95% CI 2.19-2.35 and 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99. Compared to pre-Syrian PSRs, Syrian GARs and BVORs had much greater odds of a CHC visit (adjusted odds ratios 14.69, 95% CI 12.98-16.63 and 14.08, 95% 12.05-16.44 respectively) and Syrian PSRs had twice the odds of a CHC visit. CONCLUSIONS Less timely primary care and lower odds of a CHC visit among PSRs in the first year may be attributed to selection factors and gaps in sponsors' knowledge of healthcare navigation. Improved primary care navigation outcomes in the Syrian era suggests successful health systems engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susitha Wanigaratne
- Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Rayner
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Therese A Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Natasha R Saunders
- Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michaela Hynie
- Department of Psychology/Centre for Refugee Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anja Kilibarda
- Columbia University Department of Political Science, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fitzsimon JP, Belanger C, Glazier RH, Green M, Peixoto C, Mahdavi R, Plumptre L, Bjerre LM. Clinical and economic impact of a community-based, hybrid model of in-person and virtual care in a Canadian rural setting: a cross-sectional population-based comparative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069699. [PMID: 37188465 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical and economic impact of a community-based, hybrid model of in-person and virtual care by comparing health-system performance of the rural jurisdiction where this model was implemented with neighbouring jurisdictions without such a model and the broader regional health system. DESIGN A cross-sectional comparative study. SETTING Ontario, Canada, with a focus on three largely rural public health units from 1 April 2018 until 31 March 2021. PARTICIPANTS All residents of Ontario, Canada under the age of 105 eligible for the Ontario Health Insurance Plan during the study period. INTERVENTIONS An innovative, community-based, hybrid model of in-person and virtual care, the Virtual Triage and Assessment Centre (VTAC), was implemented in Renfrew County, Ontario on 27 March 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was a change in emergency department (ED) visits anywhere in Ontario, secondary outcomes included changes in hospitalisations and health-system costs, using per cent changes in mean monthly values of linked health-system administrative data for 2 years preimplementation and 1 year postimplementation. RESULTS Renfrew County saw larger declines in ED visits (-34.4%, 95% CI -41.9% to -26.0%) and hospitalisations (-11.1%, 95% CI -19.7% to -1.5%) and slower growth in health-system costs than other rural regions studied. VTAC patients' low-acuity ED visits decreased by -32.9%, high-acuity visits increased by 8.2%, and hospitalisations increased by 30.0%. CONCLUSION After implementing VTAC, Renfrew County saw reduced ED visits and hospitalisations and slower health-system cost growth compared with neighbouring rural jurisdictions. VTAC patients experienced reduced unnecessary ED visits and increased appropriate care. Community-based, hybrid models of in-person and virtual care may reduce the burden on emergency and hospital services in rural, remote and underserved regions. Further study is required to evaluate potential for scale and spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Fitzsimon
- Arnprior and District Memorial Hospital, Arnprior Regional Health, Arnprior, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Green
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Roshanak Mahdavi
- Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lise M Bjerre
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Persaud N, Bedard M, Boozary A, Glazier RH, Gomes T, Hwang SW, Jüni P, Law MR, Mamdani M, Manns B, Martin D, Morgan SG, Oh P, Pinto AD, Shah BR, Sullivan F, Umali N, Thorpe KE, Tu K, Wu F, Laupacis A. Effect of Free Medicine Distribution on Health Care Costs in Canada Over 3 Years: A Secondary Analysis of the CLEAN Meds Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Health Forum 2023; 4:e231127. [PMID: 37234014 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Few interventions are proven to reduce total health care costs, and addressing cost-related nonadherence has the potential to do so. Objective To determine the effect of eliminating out-of-pocket medication fees on total health care costs. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial using a prespecified outcome took place across 9 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada (6 in Toronto and 3 in rural areas), where health care services are generally publicly funded. Adult patients (≥18 years old) reporting cost-related nonadherence to medicines in the past 12 months were recruited between June 1, 2016, and April 28, 2017, and followed up until April 28, 2020. Data analysis was completed in 2021. Interventions Access to a comprehensive list of 128 medicines commonly prescribed in ambulatory care with no out-of-pocket costs for 3 years vs usual medicine access. Main Outcome and Measures Total publicly funded health care costs over 3 years, including costs of hospitalizations. Health care costs were determined using administrative data from Ontario's single-payer health care system, and all costs are reported in Canadian dollars with adjustments for inflation. Results A total of 747 participants from 9 primary care sites were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 51 [14] years; 421 [56.4%] female). Free medicine distribution was associated with a lower median total health care spending over 3 years of $1641 (95% CI, $454-$2792; P = .006). Mean total spending was $4465 (95% CI, -$944 to $9874) lower over the 3-year period. Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, eliminating out-of-pocket medication expenses for patients with cost-related nonadherence in primary care was associated with lower health care spending over 3 years. These findings suggest that eliminating out-of-pocket medication costs for patients could reduce overall costs of health care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744963.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Bedard
- Department of Family Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Boozary
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen W Hwang
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Jüni
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael R Law
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Muhammad Mamdani
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Healthcare Analytics Research and Training at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Braden Manns
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Danielle Martin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven G Morgan
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Oh
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew D Pinto
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Baiju R Shah
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank Sullivan
- North York General Hospital, Toronto Western Family Health Team, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Population and Behavioral Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Norman Umali
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin E Thorpe
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Tu
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- North York General Hospital, Toronto Western Family Health Team, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fangyun Wu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas Laupacis
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aggarwal M, Kokorelias KM, Glazier RH, Katz A, Shiers-Hanley JE, Upshur REG. What is the role of primary care in the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out and the barriers and facilitators to an equitable vaccine roll-out? A rapid scoping review of nine jurisdictions. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065306. [PMID: 37076148 PMCID: PMC10123853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to: (1) examine the experience of nine global jurisdictions that engaged primary care providers (PCPs) to administer COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic; (2) describe how vaccine hesitancy and principles of equity were incorporated in the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out strategies and (3) identify the barriers and facilitators to the vaccine roll-out. DESIGN Rapid scoping review. DATA SOURCES Searches took place in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and PsycINFO, Google, and the websites of national health departments. Searches and analyses took place from May 2021 to July 2021. RESULTS Sixty-two documents met the inclusion criteria (35=grey literature; 56% and 27=peer reviewed; 44%). This review found that the vaccine distribution approach started at hospitals in almost all jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, PCPs were engaged at the beginning, and the majority included PCPs over time. In many jurisdictions, equity was considered in the prioritisation policies for various marginalised communities. However, vaccine hesitancy was not explicitly considered in the design of vaccine distribution approaches. The barriers to the roll-out of vaccines included personal, organisational and contextual factors. The vaccine roll-out strategy was facilitated by establishing policies and processes for pandemic preparedness, well-established and coordinated information systems, primary care interventions, adequate supply of providers, education and training of providers, and effective communications strategy. CONCLUSIONS Empirical evidence is lacking on the impact of a primary care-led vaccine distribution approach on vaccine hesitancy, adoption and equity. Future vaccine distribution approaches need to be informed by further research evaluating vaccine distribution approaches and their impact on patient and population outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristina Marie Kokorelias
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Katz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences University, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Ross E G Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kiran T, Green ME, Strauss R, Wu CF, Daneshvarfard M, Kopp A, Lapointe-Shaw L, Latifovic L, Frymire E, Glazier RH. Virtual Care and Emergency Department Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Patients of Family Physicians in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e239602. [PMID: 37115549 PMCID: PMC10148195 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic has played a role in increased use of virtual care in primary care. However, few studies have examined the association between virtual primary care visits and other health care use. Objective To evaluate the association between the percentage of virtual visits in primary care and the rate of emergency department (ED) visits. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used routinely collected administrative data and was conducted in Ontario, Canada. The sample comprised family physicians with at least 1 primary care visit claim between February 1 and October 31, 2021, and permanent Ontario residents who were alive as of March 31, 2021. All residents were assigned to physicians according to enrollment and billing data. Exposure Family physicians' virtual visit rate was the exposure. Physicians were stratified by the percentage of total visits that they delivered virtually (via telephone or video) during the study period (0% [100% in person], >0%-20%, >20%-40%, >40%-60%, >60%-80%, >80% to <100%, or 100%). Main Outcomes and Measures Population-level ED visit rate was calculated for each stratum of virtual care use. Multivariable regression models were used to understand the relative rate of patient ED use after adjusting for rurality of practice, patient characteristics, and 2019 ED visit rates. Results Data were analyzed for a total of 13 820 family physicians (7114 males [51.5%]; mean [SD] age, 50 [13.1] years) with 12 951 063 patients (6 714 150 females [51.8%]; mean [SD] age, 42.6 [22.9] years) who were attached to these physicians. Most physicians provided between 40% and 80% of care virtually. A higher percentage of the physicians who provided more than 80% of care virtually were 65 years or older, female individuals, and practiced in big cities. Patient comorbidity and morbidity were similar across strata of virtual care use. The mean (SD) number of ED visits was highest among patients whose physicians provided only in-person care (470.3 [1918.8] per 1000 patients) and was lowest among patients of physicians who provided more than 80% to less than 100% of care virtually (242.0 [800.3] per 1000 patients). After adjustment for patient characteristics, patients of physicians with more than 20% of visits delivered virtually had lower rates of ED visits compared with patients of physicians who provided more than 0% to 20% of care virtually (eg, >80% to <100% vs >0%-20% virtual visits in big cities: relative rate, 0.77%; 95% CI, 0.74%-0.81%). This pattern was unchanged across all rurality of practice strata and after adjustment for 2019 ED visit rates. In urban areas, there was a gradient whereby patients of physicians providing the highest level of virtual care had the lowest ED visit rates. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this study show that patients of physicians who provided a higher percentage of virtual care did not have higher ED visit rates compared with patients of physicians who provided the lowest levels of virtual care. The findings refute the hypothesis that family physicians providing more care virtually during the pandemic resulted in higher ED use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Kiran
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E Green
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Maryam Daneshvarfard
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lidija Latifovic
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eliot Frymire
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Queen's, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kasaai B, Thompson E, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Early Career Outcomes of Embedded Research Fellows: An Analysis of the Health System Impact Fellowship Program. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7333. [PMID: 37579439 PMCID: PMC10125101 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This descriptive study reports the early career outcomes of postdoctoral fellows who completed a novel embedded fellowship training program, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship. The program was designed to support impact-oriented career paths of doctoral graduates, build research capacity within health system organizations, and help to advance learning health systems in Canada. METHODS Employment of fellowship alumni upon completion of the program were tracked using internet searches of publicly accessible online sources and complemented with program survey data. RESULTS Descriptive analyses show that all 87 eligible alumni included in the study are currently employed (100% of 87), with 92% employed in Canada. Their employment spans several sectors, including in academic (37%), public (29%), healthcare delivery (17%), and private (14%) sectors. Altogether, 32% of alumni held hybrid roles with an affiliation in academia and another sector. The most common position types were senior scientist (42%), professorships (18%), and director, manager or administrator roles (12%). Program reporting data indicate that these employment outcomes are generally consistent with the group's career aspirations reported at the start of the fellowship program, and that the program receives high ratings from fellows in the extent it is believed to support their career preparedness and readiness (4.49 out of 5). CONCLUSION We find that HSI Fellow alumni are employed mostly in research-related roles in a range of sectors including, but not limited to academia, that they positively perceive the program's success in elevating their career readiness and potential to make an impact - suggesting that the program may help equip fellows with the skills, readiness and networks for a broad array of employment sectors and roles. The findings are a promising signal of the demand for research talent and the growing capacity for learning health systems in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahar Kasaai
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin Thompson
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meghan McMahon
- CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kukafka R, Salahub C, Bird C, Bhatia RS, Desveaux L, Glazier RH, Hedden L, Ivers NM, Martin D, Na Y, Spithoff S, Tadrous M, Kiran T. Characteristics and Health Care Use of Patients Attending Virtual Walk-in Clinics in Ontario, Canada: Cross-sectional Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e40267. [PMID: 36633894 PMCID: PMC9880810 DOI: 10.2196/40267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Funding changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic supported the growth of direct-to-consumer virtual walk-in clinics in several countries. Little is known about patients who attend virtual walk-in clinics or how these clinics contribute to care continuity and subsequent health care use. OBJECTIVE The objective of the present study was to describe the characteristics and measure the health care use of patients who attended virtual walk-in clinics compared to the general population and a subset that received any virtual family physician visit. METHODS This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada. Patients who had received a family physician visit at 1 of 13 selected virtual walk-in clinics from April 1 to December 31, 2020, were compared to Ontario residents who had any virtual family physician visit. The main outcome was postvisit health care use. RESULTS Virtual walk-in patients (n=132,168) had fewer comorbidities and lower previous health care use than Ontarians with any virtual family physician visit. Virtual walk-in patients were also less likely to have a subsequent in-person visit with the same physician (309/132,168, 0.2% vs 704,759/6,412,304, 11%; standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.48), more likely to have a subsequent virtual visit (40,030/132,168, 30.3% vs 1,403,778/6,412,304, 21.9%; SMD 0.19), and twice as likely to have an emergency department visit within 30 days (11,003/132,168, 8.3% vs 262,509/6,412,304, 4.1%; SMD 0.18), an effect that persisted after adjustment and across urban/rural resident groups. CONCLUSIONS Compared to Ontarians attending any family physician virtual visit, virtual walk-in patients were less likely to have a subsequent in-person physician visit and were more likely to visit the emergency department. These findings will inform policy makers aiming to ensure the integration of virtual visits with longitudinal primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christine Salahub
- Support, Systems, and Outcomes Department, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - R Sacha Bhatia
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Desveaux
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Better Health, Ontario Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Noah M Ivers
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Martin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sheryl Spithoff
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Women's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Kiran
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Austin N, Rudoler D, Allin S, Dolovich L, Glazier RH, Grudniewicz A, Martin E, Sirois C, Strumpf E. Team-based primary care reforms and older adults: a descriptive assessment of sociodemographic trends and prescribing endpoints in two Canadian provinces. BMC Prim Care 2023; 24:7. [PMID: 36627566 PMCID: PMC9832790 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Team-based primary care reforms aim to improve care coordination by involving multiple interdisciplinary health professionals in patient care. Team-based primary care may support improved medication management for older adults with polypharmacy and multiple points of contact with the healthcare system. However, little is known about this association. This study compares sociodemographic and prescribing trends among older adults in team-based vs. traditional primary care models in Ontario and Quebec. METHODS We constructed two provincial cohorts using population-level health administrative data from 2006-2018. Our primary exposure was enrollment in a team-based model of care. Key endpoints included adverse drug events (ADEs), potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs), and polypharmacy. We plotted prescribing trends across the observation period (stratified by model of care) in each province. We used standardized mean differences to compare characteristics of older adults and providers, as well as prescribing endpoints. RESULTS Formal patient/physician enrollment increased in both provinces since the time of policy implementation; team-based enrollment among older adults was higher in Quebec (47%) than Ontario (33%) by the end of our observation period. The distribution of sociodemographic characteristics was reasonably comparable between team-based and non-team-based patients in both provinces, aside from a persistently higher share of rural patients in team-based care. Most PIPs assessed either declined or remained relatively steady over time, regardless of model of care and province. Several PIPs were more common among team-based patients than non-team-based patients, particularly in Quebec. We did not detect notable trends in ADEs or polypharmacy in either province. CONCLUSIONS Our findings offer encouraging evidence that many PIPs are declining over time in this population, regardless of patients' enrollment in team-based care. Rates of decline appear similar across models of care, suggesting these models may not meaningfully influence prescribing endpoints. Additional efforts are needed to understand the impact of team-based care among older adults and improve primary care prescribing practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nichole Austin
- grid.55602.340000 0004 1936 8200Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - David Rudoler
- grid.266904.f0000 0000 8591 5963Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada ,grid.418647.80000 0000 8849 1617Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada ,grid.490416.e0000000089931637Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Canada
| | - Sara Allin
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- grid.418647.80000 0000 8849 1617Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada ,grid.415502.7St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- grid.28046.380000 0001 2182 2255University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Martin
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Caroline Sirois
- grid.23856.3a0000 0004 1936 8390Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Erin Strumpf
- grid.14709.3b0000 0004 1936 8649McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Saunders NR, Gandhi S, Wanigaratne S, Lu H, Stukel TA, Glazier RH, Rayner J, Guttmann A. Health Care Use and System Costs Among Pediatric Refugees in Canada. Pediatrics 2023; 151:190230. [PMID: 36458412 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-057441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resettled refugees land in Canada through 3 sponsorship models with similar health insurance and financial supports but differences in how resettlement is facilitated. We examined whether health system utilization, costs, and aggregate 1-year morbidity differed by resettlement model. METHODS Population-based matched cohort study in Ontario, 2008 to 2018, including pediatric (0-17 years) resettled refugees and matched Ontario-born peers and categorized refugees by resettlement model: (1) private sponsorship (PSRs), (2) Blended Visa Office-Referred program (BVORs), and (3) government-assisted refugee (GAR). Primary outcomes were health system utilization and costs in year 1 in Canada. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the associations between sponsorship model and major illnesses. RESULTS We included 23 287 resettled refugees (13 360 GARs, 1544 BVORs, 8383 PSRs) and 93 148 matched Ontario-born. Primary care visits were highest among GARs and lowest in PSRs (median visits [interquartile range], GARs 4[2-6]; BVORs 3[2-5]; PSRs 3[2-5]; P <.001). Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were more common among GARs and BVORs versus PSRs (emergency department: GARs 19.2%; BVORs 23.4%; PSRs 13.8%; hospitalizations: GARs 2.5%; BVORs 3.2%; PSRs 1.1%, P <.001). Mean 1-year health system costs were highest among GARs (mean [standard deviation] $1278 [$7475]) and lowest among PSRs ($555 [$2799]; Ontario-born $851 [9226]). Compared with PSRs, GARs (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.81) and BVORs (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.84) were more likely to have major illnesses. CONCLUSIONS Health care use and morbidity of PSRs suggests they are healthier and less costly than GARs and BVOR model refugees. Despite a greater intensity of health care utilization than Ontario-born, overall excess demand on the health system for all resettled refugee children is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Ruth Saunders
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.,Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Susitha Wanigaratne
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Therese A Stukel
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.,ICES, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Rayner
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Alliance for Healthier Communities, North York, Canada.,Western University, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, London, Canada
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.,Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bayoumi I, Whitehead M, Li W, Kurdyak P, Glazier RH. Association of physician financial incentives with primary care enrolment of adults with serious mental illnesses in Ontario: a retrospective observational population-based study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E1-E12. [PMID: 36627127 PMCID: PMC9842098 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial incentives may improve primary care access for adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (serious mental illness [SMI]). We studied the association between receipt of the SMI financial premium paid to primary care physicians and rostering of adults with SMI in different patient enrolment models (PEMs), including enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models with and without interdisciplinary team-based care. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving Ontario adults (≥18 yr) with SMI in PEM practices, in fiscal years 2016/17 and 2017/18. Using negative binomial models, we examined relations between rostering and the primary care model and the contribution of the incentive. Similar models were developed for adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and the general population. RESULTS Among 9730 physicians in PEM practices, 4866 (50.0%) received a premium and 448 319 (88.4%) people with SMI in PEMs were rostered. Compared with enhanced fee for service, the likelihood of rostering people with SMI was 3.0% higher for patients in capitation with team-based care (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.04), with similar results for capitation without team-based care (adjusted RR 1.00 95% CI 0.99-1.01). Rostering for people with diabetes was similar in team-based care (adjusted RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) but higher in capitation without team-based care (adjusted RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) and slightly higher for the Ontario population (team-based care 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.05, capitation without team-based care 1.03, 95% CI 1.03-1.04). INTERPRETATION Rostering of people with SMI was lower than for the general population. Additional policy measures are needed to address persisting inequities and to promote rostering of this underserved population with complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imaan Bayoumi
- ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Whitehead, Li), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Kurdyak, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Kurdyak), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Kurdyak), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Marlo Whitehead
- ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Whitehead, Li), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Kurdyak, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Kurdyak), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Kurdyak), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Wenbin Li
- ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Whitehead, Li), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Kurdyak, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Kurdyak), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Kurdyak), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Paul Kurdyak
- ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Whitehead, Li), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Kurdyak, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Kurdyak), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Kurdyak), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- ICES Queen's (Bayoumi, Whitehead, Li), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; ICES Central (Kurdyak, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Bayoumi), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Kurdyak), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Psychiatry (Kurdyak), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Glazier RH. Notre contribution à l’évolution du système de santé canadien pour en faire l’un des meilleurs au monde. Can Fam Physician 2023; 69:e1-e7. [PMID: 36693743 PMCID: PMC9873301 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6901e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H. Glazier
- Chercheur principal chevronné à l’ICES à Toronto, Ontario. Il est professeur au Département de médecine familiale et communautaire, à l’École de santé publique Dalla Lana et à l’Institut des politiques, de la gestion et de l’évaluation de la santé de l’Université de Toronto. Il est également médecin de famille et chercheur au MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, à l’Hôpital St Michael’s de Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ryan BL, Mondor L, Wodchis WP, Glazier RH, Meredith L, Fortin M, Stewart M. Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E45-E53. [PMID: 36649982 PMCID: PMC9851625 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multimorbidity require coordinated and patient-centred care. Telemedicine IMPACT Plus provides such care for complex patients in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing health care utilization and costs at 1-year postintervention for an intervention group and 2 control groups (RCT and propensity matched). METHODS Data for 82 RCT intervention and 74 RCT control participants were linked with health administrative data. We created a second control group using health administrative data-derived propensity scores to match (1:5) intervention participants with comparators. We evaluated 5 outcomes: acute hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs of all insured health care, 30-day hospital readmissions and 7-day family physician follow-up after hospital discharge using generalized linear models for RCT controls and generalized estimating equations for propensity-matched controls. RESULTS There were no significant differences between intervention participants and either control group. For hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs and readmissions, the relative differences ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-2.60) to 1.67 (95% CI 0.82-3.38) with intervention costs at about Can$20 000, RCT controls costs at around Can$15 000 and propensity controls costs at around Can$17 000. There was a higher rate of follow-up with a family physician for the intervention participants compared with the RCT controls (53.13 v. 21.43 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 2.48 [95% CI 0.98-6.29]) and propensity-matched controls (49.94 v. 28.21 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 1.81 [95% CI 0.99-3.30]). INTERPRETATION Despite a complex patient-centred intervention, there was no significant improvement in health care utilization or cost. Future research requires larger sample sizes and should include outcomes important to patients and the health care system, and longer follow-up periods. ONTARIO ClinicalTrials.gov : 104191.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget L Ryan
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.
| | - Luke Mondor
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Leslie Meredith
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Martin Fortin
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Moira Stewart
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Health System Performance Network (Mondor); ICES (Mondor, Wodchis); Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners (Wodchis), Mississauga, Ont.; Health System Performance Network and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier), University of Toronto, Toronto Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine (Meredith), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Fortin), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Stewart), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lavergne MR, Rudoler D, Peterson S, Stock D, Taylor C, Wilton AS, Wong ST, Scott I, McGrail KM, McCracken R, Marshall EG, MacKenzie A, Katz A, Jamieson M, Hedden L, Grudniewicz A, Goldsmith LJ, Glazier RH, Burge F, Blackie D. Declining Comprehensiveness of Services Delivered by Canadian Family Physicians Is Not Driven by Early-Career Physicians. Ann Fam Med 2023; 21:151-156. [PMID: 36973051 PMCID: PMC10042570 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe changes in the comprehensiveness of services delivered by family physicians in 4 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia) during the periods 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 and explore if changes differ by years in practice. We measured comprehensiveness using province-wide billing data across 7 settings (home, long-term care, emergency department, hospital, obstetrics, surgical assistance, anesthesiology) and 7 service areas (pre/postnatal care, Papanicolaou [Pap] testing, mental health, substance use, cancer care, minor surgery, palliative home visits). Comprehensiveness declined in all provinces, with greater changes in number of service settings than service areas. Decreases were no greater among new-to-practice physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Ruth Lavergne
- Dalhousie University, Department of Family Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M. R. L., F. B.)
- Canada Research Chairs Program, Tier II Primary Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M. R. L.)
- CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: M. Ruth Lavergne Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University 402-1465 Brenton St Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4
| | - David Rudoler
- Ontario Tech University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada (D. R.)
- Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Ontario, Canada (D. R.)
| | - Sandra Peterson
- The University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. P., S. T. W., K. M. M.)
| | - David Stock
- Dalhousie University, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (D. S., A. M.)
| | - Carole Taylor
- University of Manitoba, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (C. T.)
| | - Andrew S. Wilton
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A. S. W., R. H. G.)
| | - Sabrina T. Wong
- The University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. P., S. T. W., K. M. M.)
- National Institute of Nursing Research, Division of Intramural Research (this work was completed while at the University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (S. T. W.)
| | - Ian Scott
- The University of British Columbia, Department of Family Practice, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (I. S., R. M.)
- The University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (I. S.)
| | - Kimberlyn M. McGrail
- The University of British Columbia, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (S. P., S. T. W., K. M. M.)
| | - Rita McCracken
- The University of British Columbia, Department of Family Practice, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (I. S., R. M.)
| | - Emily G. Marshall
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (E. G. M., A. M.)
- Dalhousie University, Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (E. G. M.)
| | - Adrian MacKenzie
- Dalhousie University, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (D. S., A. M.)
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (E. G. M., A. M.)
| | - Alan Katz
- University of Manitoba, Department of Family Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (A.K.)
- University of Manitoba, Department of Community Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (A. K.)
| | - Margaret Jamieson
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M. J., R. H. G.)
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (L. H., L. J. G.)
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- University of Ottawa, Telfer School of Management, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (A. G.)
| | - Laurie J. Goldsmith
- Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada (L. H., L. J. G.)
- GoldQual Consulting, Ontario, Canada (L. J. G.)
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (A. S. W., R. H. G.)
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M. J., R. H. G.)
- St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (R. H. G.)
- University of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (R. H. G.)
| | - Fred Burge
- Dalhousie University, Department of Family Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M. R. L., F. B.)
| | - Doug Blackie
- Royal Roads University, School of Leadership Studies, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (D. B.)
- Doug Blackie Consulting, Inc, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (D. B.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Glazier RH. Our role in making the Canadian health care system one of the world's best: How family medicine and primary care can transform-and bring the rest of the system with us. Can Fam Physician 2023; 69:11-16. [PMID: 36693751 PMCID: PMC9873296 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.690111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H. Glazier
- Senior Core Scientist at ICES in Toronto, Ont. He is Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine; the Dalla Lana School of Public Health; and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto. He is also a family physician and Scientist at the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, both at St Michael’s Hospital in Toronto.,Correspondence Dr Richard H. Glazier; e-mail
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rudoler D, Peterson S, Stock D, Taylor C, Wilton D, Blackie D, Burge F, Glazier RH, Goldsmith L, Grudniewicz A, Hedden L, Jamieson M, Katz A, MacKenzie A, Marshall E, McCracken R, McGrail K, Scott I, Wong ST, Lavergne MR. Changes over time in patient visits and continuity of care among graduating cohorts of family physicians in 4 Canadian provinces. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1639-E1646. [PMID: 36511867 PMCID: PMC9828986 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of patient access to family physicians in Canada is a concern. The role of recent physician graduates in this problem of supply of primary care services has not been established. We sought to establish whether career stage or graduation cohort were related to family physician practice volume and continuity of care over time. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of family physician practice from 1997/98 to 2017/18. We collected administrative health and physician claims data in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We included all physicians who registered with their respective provincial regulatory colleges as having a medical specialty of family practice or who had billed the provincial health insurance system for patient care as family physicians, or both. We used regression models to isolate the effects of 3-year categories of years in practice (at all career stages), time period and cohort on patient contacts and physician-level continuity of care. RESULTS Between 1997/98 and 2017/18, the median number of patient contacts per provider per year fell by between 515 and 1736 contacts in the 4 provinces examined. Median contacts peaked at 27-29 years in practice in all provinces, and median physician-level continuity of care increased until 30 or more years in practice. We found no association between graduation cohort and patient contacts or physician-level continuity of care. INTERPRETATION Recent cohorts of family physicians practise similarly to their predecessors in terms of practice volumes and continuity of care. Because family physicians of all career stages showed declining patient contacts, we suggest that system-wide solutions to recent challenges in the accessibility of primary care in Canada are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rudoler
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - David Stock
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont.
| | - Carole Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Drew Wilton
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Doug Blackie
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Fred Burge
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Laurie Goldsmith
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Margaret Jamieson
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Adrian MacKenzie
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Emily Marshall
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Rita McCracken
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kim McGrail
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Ian Scott
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sabrina T Wong
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - M Ruth Lavergne
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thompson E, McMahon M, Loates K, Yarrow L, Rylett J, Glazier RH, Zelmer J. What We Have Heard: Next Steps for Long-Term Care Pandemic Preparedness in Canada. Healthc Q 2022; 25:53-58. [PMID: 36562585 DOI: 10.12927/hcq.2022.26977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
In this concluding article, Healthcare Excellence Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research reflect upon and respond to the lessons learned from the contributing articles in the special issue and summarize key takeaways for the next steps in evidence-informed pandemic preparedness in long-term care in Canada. The implications of their cross-organizational partnership for achieving collective impact now and in the future are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Thompson
- Project manager with the CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research in Toronto, ON
| | - Meghan McMahon
- Associate scientific director with the CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research in Toronto, ON
| | | | | | - Jane Rylett
- Scientific director with the CIHR Institute of Aging in London, ON
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Scientific director with the CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research in Toronto, ON
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kiran T, Green ME, Wu CF, Kopp A, Latifovic L, Frymire E, Moineddin R, Glazier RH. Family Physicians Stopping Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:460-463. [PMID: 36228068 PMCID: PMC9512549 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted 2 analyses using administrative data to understand whether more family physicians in Ontario, Canada stopped working during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years. First, we found 3.1% of physicians working in 2019 (n = 385/12,247) reported no billings in the first 6 months of the pandemic; compared with other family physicians, a higher portion were aged 75 years or older (13.0% vs 3.4%, P <0.001), had fee-for-service reimbursement (37.7% vs 24.9%, P <0.001), and had a panel size under 500 patients (40.0% vs 25.8%, P <0.001). Second, a fitted regression line found the absolute increase in the percentage of family physicians stopping work was 0.03% per year from 2010 to 2019 (P = 0.042) but 1.2% between 2019 to 2020 (P <0.001). More research is needed to understand the impact of physicians stopping work on primary care attachment and access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Kiran
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael E Green
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,ICES Queens, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Lidija Latifovic
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eliot Frymire
- Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,ICES Queens, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saxena FE, Bierman AS, Glazier RH, Wang X, Guan J, Lee DS, Stukel TA. Association of Early Physician Follow-up With Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2222056. [PMID: 35819782 PMCID: PMC9277500 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A better understanding of the association between early physician follow-up after discharge and adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients may inform interventions aimed at reducing readmission for common chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE To assess whether hospitalized patients with early physician follow-up after discharge had lower rates of overall and condition-specific readmissions within 30 days and 90 days of discharge. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted among Ontario, Canada, adults with first admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during 2005 to 2019. The exposure was follow-up visit with a primary care physician or relevant specialist within 7 days of discharge. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare patients with vs without early follow-up, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, weighting by propensity score-based overlap weights. Data were analyzed from January through July 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmissions, cardiac readmissions (readmission for AMI, CHF, or angina) for patients with cardiac conditions, and COPD-related readmissions for patients with COPD. Mortality at 30 days and 90 days was a secondary outcome. All percentages reported in Results are unweighted. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 450 746 patients, including 198 854 patients with AMI, 133 058 patients with CHF, and 118 834 patients with COPD; the median (IQR) age was 66 (56-77) years for AMI, 78 (68-85) years for CHF, and 73 (64-81) years for COPD, and there were 64 339 (32.35%) women, 62 575 (47.03%) women, and 59 179 (49.80%) women, respectively. There were 91 182 patients (45.85%), 56 491 patients (42.46%), and 40 159 patients (33.79%), respectively, who received an early follow-up visit. Overall, patients with early follow-up had higher rates of collaborative care (eg, CHF: 20 931 patients [37.85%] vs 11 101 of 76 567 patients [14.85%]) and visits to a specialist within 30 days (eg, CHF: 25 797 patients [45.67%] vs 20 548 patients [26.84%]). Those with early follow-up had lower 90-day readmission rates among patients with CHF (15 934 patients [28.21%] vs 23 121 patients [30.20%]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and among those with COPD (8784 patients [21.87%] vs 18 097 of 78 675 patients [23.00%]; aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Among patients with COPD, those with early follow-up had lower 90-day COPD-related readmission rates (4015 patients [10.00%] vs 8449 patients [10.74%]; aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96), and among patients with CHF, those with early follow-up had lower 90-day mortality rates (4044 patients [7.16%] vs 6281 patients [8.20%]; aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). There were no significant benefits at 30 days or for patients with AMI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that early follow-up in conjunction with a comprehensive transitional care strategy for hospitalized patients with medically complex conditions coupled with ongoing effective chronic disease management may be associated with reduced 90-day readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arlene S. Bierman
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Douglas S. Lee
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at the Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Therese A. Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McMahon M, Nadigel J, Kasaai B, Shahid N, Thompson E, Glazier RH. From Strategy to Implementation: Optimizing the Contribution of Health Services and Policy Research to Equitable Healthcare System Transformation. Healthc Pap 2022; 20:78-83. [PMID: 35759488 DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2022.26840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Institute of Health Services and Policy Research's (IHSPR) Strategic Plan 2021-2026 (CIHR IHSPR 2021) aims to accelerate healthcare system transformation to achieve the Quadruple Aim and health equity through research. This special issue features a collection of commentaries from academic and health system leaders who were invited to respond to IHSPR's strategic plan and share insights regarding the opportunities the plan presents and areas where more attention may be needed. The present paper features a response from the IHSPR team and outlines the next steps regarding implementation. IHSPR is deeply grateful to the commentary authors for their insight, advice and recommendations, which will help to inform the implementation of the plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan McMahon
- Associate Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Assistant Professor (status), Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Jessica Nadigel
- Associate Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Bahar Kasaai
- Project Lead, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Nida Shahid
- Project Officer, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Erin Thompson
- Project Manager, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McMahon M, Nadigel J, Thompson E, Shahid N, Kasaai B, Richard J, Glazier RH. Accelerating Health System Transformation through Research to Achieve the Quadruple Aim and Health Equity. Healthc Pap 2022; 20:9-24. [PMID: 35759481 DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2022.26847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Institute of Health Services and Policy Research's (IHSPR's) Strategic Plan 2021-2026: Accelerate Health Care System Transformation through Research to Achieve the Quadruple Aim and Health Equity for All (CIHR IHSPR 2021) outlines the Institute's key priority areas for investment and activity over the next five years. IHSPR used an evidence-informed strategic planning process that was pan-Canadian in scope and designed to elicit the health services and policy research priorities of decision makers, providers, researchers, patients, communities and the public. This paper outlines IHSPR's four key strategic priorities for supporting and optimizing research in transforming Canada's healthcare delivery systems over the next five years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan McMahon
- Associate Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Assistant Professor (status), Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Jessica Nadigel
- Associate Scientific Director CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Erin Thompson
- Project Manager, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Nida Shahid
- Project Officer, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Bahar Kasaai
- Project Lead, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Johanne Richard
- Administrative Assistant, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Scientific Director, CIHR Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pereira J, Hogg W, Graves E, Kljujic D, Archibald D, Oandasan I, Glazier RH. Practice Profiles and Patterns of Ontario Family Medicine Residents 5 Years After Residency Examinations: An Exploratory Study. Fam Med 2022; 54:97-106. [DOI: 10.22454/fammed.2022.758906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The primary goal of family medicine residency training is for graduates to provide high-quality, safe, and effective patient care for the population they serve when they enter practice. This study explores (a) the practice profiles, 5 years into practice, of residents who completed family medicine training in Ontario, Canada; and (b) relationships between performance on the College of Family Physicians of Canada’s (CFPC) Certification Examination in Family Medicine and quality of care provided 5 years into practice.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study with secondary data analysis. We merged CFPC examination data sets with the ICES (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) administrative database. We included physicians who passed the examination between the years 2000 and 2010 and practiced in Ontario after graduation. Practice profile indicators included practice type, continuity and comprehensiveness of care, patient rostering and panel size, and rurality index. We explored 11 indicators related to management of diabetes and cancer screening.
Results: We included a total of 1,983 physicians in the analyses. Five years after the examinations, 74.3% of the physicians were working in major urban centers, and 67.3% of the physicians were providing comprehensive primary care. We noted significant differences across the six medical schools in multiple practice profile indicators, and three indicators showed significant differences across the examination score quintiles.
Conclusions: Graduates of Ontario family medicine residency programs were providing care to a broad spectrum of the population 5 years after passing the examination, and they performed similarly across quality-of-care indicators regardless of examination scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Pereira
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Canada
| | - William Hogg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Erin Graves
- Institutes of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dragan Kljujic
- Research Department, College of Family Physicians of Canada
| | - Douglas Archibald
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivy Oandasan
- Education Department, College of Family Physicians of Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
- St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- and ICES, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kiran T, Moineddin R, Kopp A, Glazier RH. Impact of Team-Based Care on Emergency Department Use. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:24-31. [PMID: 35074764 PMCID: PMC8786428 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to assess the impact of team-based care on emergency department (ED) use in the context of physicians transitioning from fee-for-service payment to capitation payment in Ontario, Canada. METHODS We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess annual ED visit rates before and after transition from an enhanced fee-for-service model to either a team capitation model or a nonteam capitation model. We included Ontario residents aged 19 years and older who had at least 3 years of outcome data both pretransition and post-transition (N = 2,524,124). We adjusted for age, sex, income quintile, immigration status, comorbidity, and morbidity, and we stratified by rurality. A sensitivity analysis compared outcomes for team vs nonteam patients matched on year of transition, age, sex, rurality, and health region. RESULTS We compared 387,607 team and 1,399,103 nonteam patients in big cities, 213,394 team and 380,009 nonteam patients in small towns, and 65,289 team and 78,722 nonteam patients in rural areas. In big cities, after adjustment, the ED visit rate increased by 2.4% (95% CI, 2.2% to 2.6%) per year for team patients and 5.2% (95% CI, 5.1% to 5.3%) per year for nonteam patients in the years after transition (P <.001). Similarly, there was a slower increase in ED visits for team relative to nonteam patients in small towns (0.9% [95% CI, 0.7% to 1.1%] vs 2.9% [95% CI, 2.8% to 3.1%], P <.001) and rural areas (‒0.5% [95% CI, -0.8% to 0.2%] vs 1.3% [95% CI, 1.0% to 1.6%], P <.001). Results were much the same in the matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of team-based primary care may reduce ED use. Further research is needed to understand optimal team composition and roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Kiran
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Premji K, Sucha E, Glazier RH, Green ME, Wodchis WP, Hogg WE, Kiran T, Frymire E, Freeman TR, Ryan BL. Primary care bonus payments and patient-reported access in urban Ontario: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E1080-E1096. [PMID: 34848549 PMCID: PMC8648352 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rurality strongly correlates with higher pay-for-performance access bonuses, despite higher emergency department use and fewer primary care services than in urban settings. We sought to evaluate the relation between patient-reported access to primary care and access bonus payments in urban settings. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, secondary data analysis using Ontario survey and health administrative data from 2013 to 2017. We used administrative data to calculate annual access bonuses for eligible urban family physicians. We linked this payment data to adult (≥ 16 yr) patient data from the Health Care Experiences Survey to examine the relation between access bonus achievement (in quintiles of the proportion of bonus achieved, from lowest [Q1, reference category] to highest [Q5]) and 4 patient-reported access outcomes. The average survey response rate to the patient survey during the study period was 51%. We stratified urban geography into large, medium and small settings. In a multilevel regression model, we adjusted for patient-, physician- and practice-level covariates. We tested linear trends, adjusted for clustering, for each outcome. RESULTS We linked 18 893 respondents to 3940 physicians in 414 bonus-eligible practices. Physicians in small urban settings earned the highest proportion of their maximum potential access bonuses. Access bonus achievement was positively associated with telephone access (Q2 odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.42; Q3 OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63; Q4 OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.19-1.79; Q5 OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.50-2.33), after hours access (Q2 OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47; Q3 OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.74; Q4 OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.46-2.15; Q5 OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.52-2.32), wait time for care (Q2 OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.20; Q3 OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.41; Q4 OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.55; Q5 OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.32-2.00) and timeliness (Q2 OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.98-1.69; Q3 OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.94-1.77; Q4 OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.16-2.13; Q5 OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.38-2.82). When stratified by geography, we observed several of these associations in large urban settings, but not in small urban settings. Trend tests were statistically significant for all 4 outcomes. INTERPRETATION Although the access bonus correlated with access in larger urban settings, it did not in smaller settings, aligning with previous research questioning its utility in smaller geographies. The access bonus may benefit from a redesign that considers geography and patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila Premji
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont.
| | - Ewa Sucha
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Michael E Green
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - William E Hogg
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Tara Kiran
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Eliot Frymire
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Thomas R Freeman
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| | - Bridget L Ryan
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry (Premji, Freeman, Ryan), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Premji), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Sucha, Hogg), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.; ICES Toronto (Glazier, Kiran); Department of Family and Community Medicine and MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; ICES Queen's (Green); Department of Family Medicine (Green); Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green, Frymire), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Wodchis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute for Better Health (Wodchis), Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ont.; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Hogg), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Freeman), Department of Family Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ryan), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
White D, Carroll JC, Crann S, Shapiro M, Whitehead C, Freeman R, Glazier RH, Martin D, Kidd M. A Master Class in Family Doctor Leadership: Evaluating an Innovative Program. Fam Med 2021; 53:701-707. [PMID: 34587266 DOI: 10.22454/fammed.2021.512946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In family medicine, leadership is critical for health care delivery, advancing curricula, research, and quality improvement. Systematic reviews of leadership development programs in health care identify limitations, calling for innovative designs and rigorous assessment. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of applying master class principles to leadership development in academic family medicine. METHODS We used mixed methods to assess the impact of an innovative master class program on 15 emerging leaders in a large academic department of family medicine. The program consisted of five sessions where family physician masters shared their wisdom, techniques, and feedback with promising leaders. Quantitative evaluation involved participants' ratings of each session's content and delivery using a 5-point Likert scale. We assessed postcourse semistructured interviews with participants qualitatively using descriptive thematic content analysis. RESULTS Individual sessions were highly evaluated, with a combined mean of 4.82/5. Qualitative thematic analysis identified self-perceived increased effectiveness in leadership activities; increased confidence as a leader; increased motivation to be a leader; and perceptions of value from the program, contributing to what participants described as unexpected potential change within themselves. Themes related to effectiveness of the program were practical advice; networking; diverse topics; accessible speakers sharing personal stories; and small-group, informal, early-evening format. CONCLUSIONS Master class concepts can be adapted to leadership development in academic family medicine, with evidence of early positive impact on participants' self-perception of leadership skills and confidence. Further research is warranted to assess organizational impact and applicability to other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David White
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,and North York General Hospital
| | - June C Carroll
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara Crann
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Marla Shapiro
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,and North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Whitehead
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Risa Freeman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,and Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,and ICES, Toronto, Canada
| | - Danielle Martin
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,and Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Kidd
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lofters AK, O'Brien MA, Sutradhar R, Pinto AD, Baxter NN, Donnelly P, Elliott R, Glazier RH, Huizinga J, Kyle R, Manca D, Pietrusiak MA, Rabeneck L, Riordan B, Selby P, Sivayoganathan K, Snider C, Sopcak N, Thorpe K, Tinmouth J, Wall B, Zuo F, Grunfeld E, Paszat L. Correction to: Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1714. [PMID: 34548061 PMCID: PMC8456665 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11700-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A K Lofters
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. .,Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada. .,Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada. .,ICES, Toronto, Canada.
| | - M A O'Brien
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A D Pinto
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - N N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Donnelly
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,University of St. Andrews, Scotland, UK
| | - R Elliott
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - R H Glazier
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Huizinga
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - R Kyle
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - D Manca
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - L Rabeneck
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - B Riordan
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - P Selby
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - K Sivayoganathan
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - C Snider
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - N Sopcak
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - K Thorpe
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Tinmouth
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - B Wall
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - F Zuo
- Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Grunfeld
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Paszat
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haj-Ali W, Hutchison B, Moineddin R, Wodchis WP, Glazier RH. Comparing primary care Interprofessional and non-interprofessional teams on access to care and health services utilization in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:963. [PMID: 34521410 PMCID: PMC8439083 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06595-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many countries, including Canada, have introduced primary care reforms to improve health system functioning and value. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between receiving care from interprofessional primary care teams and after-hours access to care, patient-reported walk-in clinic visits and emergency department use. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study linking population-based administrative databases to Ontario’s Health Care Experience Survey (HCES) between 2012 and 2018. We adjusted for physician group characteristics as well as individual physician and patient characteristics while assessing the relationship between receiving care from interprofessional teams and the outcomes of interest. Results As of March 31st, 2015, there were 465 physician groups with HCES respondents of which 177 (38.0%) were interprofessional teams and 288 (62.0%) were non-interprofessional teams in the same blended capitation reimbursement model. In this period, there were 4518 physicians with HCES respondents, of whom 2131 (47.2%) were in interprofessional teams and 2387 (52.8%) were in non-interprofessional teams. There were 10,102 HCES respondents included in this study, of whom 42.4% were in interprofessional teams and 42.3% were in non-interprofessional teams. After adjustment, we found that being in an interprofessional team was associated with an increase in the odds of patients reporting same/next day access to care by 12.0% (OR = 1.12 CI = 1.00 to 1.24 p-value 0.0436) and a decrease in the odds of patients reporting walk-in clinic use by 16% (OR = 0.84 CI = 0.75 to 0.94 p-value 0.0019). After adjustment, there were no significant differences in patient-reported after-hours access to care and emergency department use. Conclusions Ontario has invested heavily in interprofessional primary care teams. As compared to patients in non-interprofessional teams, patients in interprofessional teams self-reported more timely access to care and less walk-in clinic use but no significant difference in self-reported access to after-hours care or in emergency department use. For jurisdictions aiming to expand physician voluntary participation in interprofessional teams, our study results inform expectations around access to care and health services utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wissam Haj-Ali
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada. .,Canadian Centre for Health Economics, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Brian Hutchison
- Departments of Family Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Rahim Moineddin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Trillium Health Partners, Institute for Better Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lofters AK, O'Brien MA, Sutradhar R, Pinto AD, Baxter NN, Donnelly P, Elliott R, Glazier RH, Huizinga J, Kyle R, Manca DM, Pietrusiak MA, Rabeneck L, Riordan B, Selby P, Sivayoganathan K, Snider C, Sopcak N, Thorpe K, Tinmouth J, Wall B, Zuo F, Grunfeld E, Paszat L. Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1496. [PMID: 34344340 PMCID: PMC8329623 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11452-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BETTER (Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care) intervention was designed to integrate the approach to chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care and demonstrated effective in a previous randomized trial. METHODS We tested the effectiveness of the BETTER HEALTH intervention, a public health adaptation of BETTER, at improving participation in chronic disease prevention and screening actions for residents of low-income neighbourhoods in a cluster randomized trial, with ten low-income neighbourhoods in Durham Region Ontario randomized to immediate intervention vs. wait-list. The unit of analysis was the individual, and eligible participants were adults age 40-64 years residing in the neighbourhoods. Public health nurses trained as "prevention practitioners" held one prevention-focused visit with each participant. They provided participants with a tailored prevention prescription and supported them to set health-related goals. The primary outcome was a composite index: the number of evidence-based actions achieved at six months as a proportion of those for which participants were eligible at baseline. RESULTS Of 126 participants (60 in immediate arm; 66 in wait-list arm), 125 were included in analyses (1 participant withdrew consent). In both arms, participants were eligible for a mean of 8.6 actions at baseline. At follow-up, participants in the immediate intervention arm met 64.5% of actions for which they were eligible versus 42.1% in the wait-list arm (rate ratio 1.53 [95% confidence interval 1.22-1.84]). CONCLUSION Public health nurses using the BETTER HEALTH intervention led to a higher proportion of identified evidence-based prevention and screening actions achieved at six months for people living with socioeconomic disadvantage. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03052959 , registered February 10, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Lofters
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. .,Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada. .,Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada. .,ICES, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | - M A O'Brien
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A D Pinto
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - N N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - R Elliott
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - R H Glazier
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Huizinga
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - R Kyle
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - D M Manca
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - L Rabeneck
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - B Riordan
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - P Selby
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - K Sivayoganathan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - C Snider
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - N Sopcak
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - K Thorpe
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Tinmouth
- Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - B Wall
- Durham Region Health Department, Whitby, Canada
| | - F Zuo
- Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Grunfeld
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Paszat
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jaakkimainen L, Bayoumi I, Glazier RH, Premji K, Kiran T, Khan S, Frymire E, Green ME. Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers. J Health Organ Manag 2021; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 34304401 PMCID: PMC8956282 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-05-2020-0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The authors developed and validated an algorithm using health administrative data to identify patients who are attached or uncertainly attached to a primary care provider (PCP) using patient responses to a survey conducted in Ontario, Canada. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a validation study using as a reference standard respondents to a community-based survey who indicated they did or did not have a PCP. The authors developed and tested health administrative algorithms against this reference standard. The authors calculated the sensitivity, specificity positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) on the final patient attachment algorithm. The authors then applied the attachment algorithm to the 2017 Ontario population. Findings The patient attachment algorithm had an excellent sensitivity (90.5%) and PPV (96.8%), though modest specificity (46.1%) and a low NPV (21.3%). This means that the algorithm assigned survey respondents as being attached to a PCP and when in fact they said they had a PCP, yet a significant proportion of those found to be uncertainly attached had indicated they did have a PCP. In 2017, most people in Ontario, Canada (85.4%) were attached to a PCP but 14.6% were uncertainly attached. Research limitations/implications Administrative data for nurse practitioner's encounters and other interprofessional care providers are not currently available. The authors also cannot separately identify primary care visits conducted in walk in clinics using our health administrative data. Finally, the definition of hospital-based healthcare use did not include outpatient specialty care. Practical implications Uncertain attachment to a primary health care provider is a recurrent problem that results in inequitable access in health services delivery. Providing annual reports on uncertainly attached patients can help evaluate primary care system changes developed to improve access. This algorithm can be used by health care planners and policy makers to examine the geographic variability and time trends of the uncertainly attached population to inform the development of programs to improve primary care access. Social implications As primary care is an essential component of a person's medical home, identifying regions or high need populations that have higher levels of uncertainly attached patients will help target programs to support their primary care access and needs. Furthermore, this approach will be useful in future research to determine the health impacts of uncertain attachment to primary care, especially in view of a growing body of the literature highlighting the importance of primary care continuity. Originality/value This patient attachment algorithm is the first to use existing health administrative data validated with responses from a patient survey. Using patient surveys alone to assess attachment levels is expensive and time consuming to complete. They can also be subject to poor response rates and recall bias. Utilizing existing health administrative data provides more accurate, timely estimates of patient attachment for everyone in the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liisa Jaakkimainen
- Primary Care and Health Systems, ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Imaan Bayoumi
- Department of Familty Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kamila Premji
- Central Ottawa Family Medicine Associates, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Tara Kiran
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michaels's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Eliot Frymire
- ICES, Queens University, Kingston, Canada.,Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Michael E Green
- ICES, Queens University, Kingston, Canada.,Departments of Family Medicine, Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Moin JS, Glazier RH, Kuluski K, Kiss A, Upshur REG. Examine the association between key determinants identified by the chronic disease indicator framework and multimorbidity by rural and urban settings. J Comorb 2021; 11:26335565211028157. [PMID: 34262879 PMCID: PMC8252380 DOI: 10.1177/26335565211028157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Multimorbidity, often defined as having two or more chronic conditions is a global phenomenon. This study examined the association between key determinants identified by the chronic disease indicator framework and multimorbidity by rural and urban settings. The prevalence of individual diseases was also investigated by age and sex. Methods The Canada Community Health Survey and linked health administrative databases were used to examine the association between multimorbidity, sociodemographic, behavioral, and other risk factors in the province of Ontario. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to conduct the main analysis. Results Analyses were stratified by age (20-64 and 65-95) and area of residence (rural and urban). A total sample of n = 174,938 residents between the ages of 20-95 were examined in the Ontario province, of which 18.2% (n = 31,896) were multimorbid with 2 chronic conditions, and 23.4% (n = 40,883) with 3+ chronic conditions. Females had a higher prevalence of 2 conditions (17.9% versus 14.6%) and 3+ conditions (19.7% vs. 15.6%) relative to males. Out of all examined variables, poor self-perception of health, age, Body Mass Index, and income were most significantly associated with multimorbidity. Smoking was a significant risk factor in urban settings but not rural, while drinking was significant in rural and not urban settings. Income inequality was associated with multimorbidity with greater magnitude in rural areas. Prevalence of multimorbidity and having three or more chronic conditions were highest among low-income populations. Conclusion Interventions targeting population weight, age/sex specific disease burdens, and additional focus on stable income are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Moin
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dalla Lana School of Public Health), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Central Site (ICES Central), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dalla Lana School of Public Health), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Kiss
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dalla Lana School of Public Health), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Central Site (ICES Central), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dalla Lana School of Public Health), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gomes T, Campbell TJ, Martins D, Paterson JM, Robertson L, Juurlink DN, Mamdani M, Glazier RH. Inequities in access to primary care among opioid recipients in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003631. [PMID: 34061846 PMCID: PMC8168863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stigma and high-care needs can present barriers to the provision of high-quality primary care for people with opioid use disorder (OUD) and those prescribed opioids for chronic pain. We explored the likelihood of securing a new primary care provider (PCP) among people with varying histories of opioid use who had recently lost access to their PCP. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data among residents of Ontario, Canada whose enrolment with a physician practicing in a primary care enrolment model (PEM) was terminated between January 2016 and December 2017. We assigned individuals to 3 groups based upon their opioid use on the date enrolment ended: long-term opioid pain therapy (OPT), opioid agonist therapy (OAT), or no opioid. We fit multivariable models assessing the primary outcome of primary care reattachment within 1 year, adjusting for demographic characteristics, clinical comorbidities, and health services utilization. Secondary outcomes included rates of emergency department (ED) visits and opioid toxicity events. Among 154,970 Ontarians who lost their PCP, 1,727 (1.1%) were OAT recipients, 3,644 (2.4%) were receiving long-term OPT, and 149,599 (96.5%) had no recent prescription opioid exposure. In general, OAT recipients were younger (median age 36) than those receiving long-term OPT (59 years) and those with no recent prescription opioid exposure (44 years). In all exposure groups, the majority of individuals had their enrolment terminated by their physician (range 78.1% to 88.8%). In the primary analysis, as compared to those not receiving opioids, OAT recipients were significantly less likely to find a PCP within 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.61, p < 0.0001). We observed no significant difference between long-term OPT and opioid unexposed individuals (aHR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.01, p = 0.12). In our secondary analysis comparing the period of PCP loss to the year prior, we found that rates of ED visits were elevated among people not receiving opioids (adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.22, p < 0.0001) and people receiving long-term OPT (aRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.48, p < 0.0001). We found no such increase among OAT recipients, and no significant increase in opioid toxicity events in the period following provider loss for any exposure group. The main limitation of our findings relates to their generalizability outside of PEMs and in jurisdictions with different financial incentives incorporated into primary care provision. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed gaps in access to primary care among people who receive prescription opioids, particularly among OAT recipients. Ongoing efforts are needed to address the stigma, discrimination, and financial disincentives that may introduce barriers to the healthcare system, and to facilitate access to high-quality, consistent primary care services for chronic pain patients and those with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Gomes
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Tonya J. Campbell
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
| | - Diana Martins
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - J. Michael Paterson
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - David N. Juurlink
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Muhammad Mamdani
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard H. Glazier
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Persaud N, Bedard M, Boozary A, Glazier RH, Gomes T, Hwang SW, Juni P, Law MR, Mamdani M, Manns B, Martin D, Morgan SG, Oh P, Pinto AD, Shah BR, Sullivan F, Umali N, Thorpe KE, Tu K, Laupacis A. Adherence at 2 years with distribution of essential medicines at no charge: The CLEAN Meds randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003590. [PMID: 34019540 PMCID: PMC8139488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to medicines is low for a variety of reasons, including the cost borne by patients. Some jurisdictions publicly fund medicines for the general population, but many jurisdictions do not, and such policies are contentious. To our knowledge, no trials studying free access to a wide range of medicines have been conducted. METHODS AND FINDINGS We randomly assigned 786 primary care patients who reported not taking medicines due to cost between June 1, 2016 and April 28, 2017 to either free distribution of essential medicines (n = 395) or to usual medicine access (n = 391). The trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, where hospital care and physician services are publicly funded for the general population but medicines are not. The trial population was mostly female (56%), younger than 65 years (83%), white (66%), and had a low income from wages as the primary source (56%). The primary outcome was medicine adherence after 2 years. Secondary outcomes included control of diabetes, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients taking relevant treatments and healthcare costs over 2 years. Adherence to all appropriate prescribed medicines was 38.7% in the free distribution group and 28.6% in the usual access group after 2 years (absolute difference 10.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 to 16.9, p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in control of diabetes (hemoglobin A1c 0.27; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.79, p = 0.302), systolic blood pressure (-3.9; 95% CI -9.9 to 2.2, p = 0.210), or LDL cholesterol (0.26; 95% CI -0.08 to 0.60, p = 0.130) based on available data. Total healthcare costs over 2 years were lower with free distribution (difference in median CAN$1,117; 95% CI CAN$445 to CAN$1,778, p = 0.006). In the free distribution group, 51 participants experienced a serious adverse event, while 68 participants in the usual access group experienced a serious adverse event (p = 0.091). Participants were not blinded, and some outcomes depended on participant reports. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that free distribution of essential medicines to patients with cost-related nonadherence substantially increased adherence, did not affect surrogate health outcomes, and reduced total healthcare costs over 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02744963.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Bedard
- Department of Family Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Boozary
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tara Gomes
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen W Hwang
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Juni
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael R Law
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Muhammad Mamdani
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Healthcare Analytics Research and Training at St Michael's Hospital and Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Braden Manns
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Danielle Martin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven G Morgan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul Oh
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew D Pinto
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Baiju R Shah
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank Sullivan
- Department of Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Population and Behavioral Science, University of St Andrews, Scotland
| | - Norman Umali
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin E Thorpe
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Tu
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas Laupacis
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED Multimorbidity has become highly prevalent around the globe and been associated with adverse health outcomes and cost of care. The built environment has become an important dimension in response to obesity and associated chronic diseases by addressing population sedentariness and low physical activity. OBJECTIVE The aim of the following study was to examine whether there was an increased risk for multimorbidity for those living in less walkable neighbourhoods. It was hypothesised that participants residing in less walkable neighbourhoods would have a higher risk for multimorbidity. SETTING City of Toronto and 14 neighbouring regions/municipalities within Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS Study participants who had completed the Canadian Community Health Survey between the year 2000 and 2012, between 20 and 64 and 65 and 95 years of age, residing within a neighbourhood captured in the Walkability Index, and who were not multimorbid at the time of interview, were selected. INTERVENTION The Walkability Index was the key exposure in the study, which is divided into quintiles (1-least, 5-most walkable neighbourhoods). Participants were retrospectively allocated to one of five quintiles based on their area of residency (at the time of interview) and followed for a maximum of 16 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Becoming multimorbid with two chronic conditions. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE Becoming multimorbid with three chronic conditions. RESULTS Risk for multimorbidity (two chronic conditions) was highest in least compared with most walkable neighbourhoods with an HR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.28, p=0.0230). While results showed an overall gradient response between decreased walkability and increased risk for multimorbidity, they were not statistically significant across all quintiles or in the older-adult cohort (65-95 years of age). CONCLUSION Study results seem to suggest that low neighbourhood walkability may be a risk factor for multimorbidity over time. More studies are needed to examine whether neighbourhood walkability is a potential solution for multimorbidity prevention at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Sina Moin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kerry Kuluski
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alex Kiss
- Department of Research Design and Biostatistics, Sunnybrooke Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ross Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
McMahon M, Creatore MI, Thompson E, Lay AM, Hoffman SJ, Finegood DT, Glazier RH. The Promise of Science, Knowledge Mobilization, and Rapid Learning Systems for COVID-19 Recovery. Int J Health Serv 2021; 51:242-246. [PMID: 33736515 DOI: 10.1177/0020731421997089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The health, economic, and social crises created by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been global in scope and inequitable in impact. The global road to recovery can be enhanced with robust, relevant, and timely scientific evidence. This commentary seeks to illustrate the power of science, scientific collaboration, and innovative research funding programs to inform pandemic recovery and inspire transformational changes for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future. Specifically, this commentary provides an introduction to the United Nations (UN) Research Roadmap for the COVID-19 Recovery that was published in November 2020. It introduces 5 scoping reviews that helped inform the UN Research Roadmap and that are now available open access within this series of special papers, and it provides an overview of an innovative research funding program that facilitated rapid mobilization and collaboration to produce the scoping reviews. The publication of the scoping reviews in this journal series will help complement and amplify the UN Research Roadmap by furthering knowledge mobilization efforts and informing COVID-19 recovery around the world, to ensure a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable postpandemic future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan McMahon
- Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, 27349Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marisa I Creatore
- 280092Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Erin Thompson
- Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, 27349Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Morgan Lay
- 280092Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven J Hoffman
- 280092Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Global Strategy Lab, Toronto, ON, Canada.,York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diane T Finegood
- 27349Canadian Health Services and Policy Research Alliance, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue, 1763Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,1763Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Institute of Health Services and Policy Research, 27349Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES (Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences) central, Toronto, ON, Canada.,MAP Centre of Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lane NE, Ling V, Glazier RH, Stukel TA. Primary care physician volume and quality of care for older adults with dementia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22:51. [PMID: 33750310 PMCID: PMC7945328 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01398-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Some jurisdictions restrict primary care physicians’ daily patient volume to safeguard quality of care for complex patients. Our objective was to determine whether people with dementia receive lower-quality care if their primary care physician sees many patients daily. Methods Population-based retrospective cohort study using health administrative data from 100,256 community-living adults with dementia aged 66 years or older, and the 8,368 primary care physicians who cared for them in Ontario, Canada. Multivariable Poisson GEE regression models tested whether physicians’ daily patient volume was associated with the adjusted likelihood of people with dementia receiving vaccinations, prescriptions for cholinesterase inhibitors, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics from their primary care physician. Results People with dementia whose primary care physicians saw ≥ 30 patients daily were 32% (95% CI: 23% to 41%, p < 0.0001) and 25% (95% CI: 17% to 33%, p < 0.0001) more likely to be prescribed benzodiazepines and antipsychotic medications, respectively, than patients of primary care physicians who saw < 20 patients daily. Patients were 3% (95% CI: 0.4% to 6%, p = 0.02) less likely to receive influenza vaccination and 8% (95% CI: 4% to 13%, p = 0.0001) more likely to be prescribed cholinesterase inhibitors if their primary care physician saw ≥ 30 versus < 20 patients daily. Conclusions People with dementia were more likely to receive both potentially harmful and potentially beneficial medications, and slightly less likely to be vaccinated by high-volume primary care physicians. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01398-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha E Lane
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 10th Floor , Vancouver, V5Z 1M9, Canada. .,ICES, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Vicki Ling
- ICES, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- ICES, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada.,MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Thérèse A Stukel
- ICES, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine At Dartmouth, 74 College Street, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Biswas A, Gilbert-Ouimet M, Mustard CA, Glazier RH, Smith PM. Combined Associations of Work and Leisure Time Physical Activity on Incident Diabetes Risk. Am J Prev Med 2021; 60:e149-e158. [PMID: 33248879 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examines the separate and combined relationships between occupational physical activity (characterized by nonaerobic activities such as heavy lifting and prolonged standing) and leisure time physical activity on future diabetes incidence. METHODS Data from Ontario respondents aged 35-74 years from the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey (N=40,507) were prospectively linked to the Ontario Diabetes Database for diabetes cases until 2017, with statistical analysis performed in 2019. Leisure time physical activity was self-reported and occupational physical activity estimated from occupation titles. The analytical sample consisted of 7,026 employed people without previous diabetes diagnoses, with 846 diabetes cases recorded. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate relationships over a median follow-up time of 13.7 years. RESULTS No relationships were observed between occupational physical activity and diabetes. High leisure time physical activity was associated with lower diabetes risk for low occupational physical activity and stationary jobs (hazard ratio=0.63, 95% CI=0.47, 0.85). No association was found for high leisure time physical activity on diabetes risk for high occupational physical activity (hazard ratio=1.07, 95% CI=0.73, 1.56) or low occupational physical activity with movement (hazard ratio=0.92, 95% CI=0.55, 1.55). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that physical activity recommendations exclusively recommending increased physical activity may only be effective for the sedentary part of the working population in reducing diabetes risk. Findings await confirmation in comparable prospective studies in other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviroop Biswas
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada
| | - Cameron A Mustard
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto and St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter M Smith
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Glazier RH, Green ME, Wu FC, Frymire E, Kopp A, Kiran T. Shifts in office and virtual primary care during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ 2021; 193:E200-E210. [PMID: 33558406 PMCID: PMC7954541 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.202303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, primary care changed dramatically as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to understand the degree to which office and virtual primary care changed, and for which patients and physicians, during the initial months of the pandemic in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This population-based study compared comprehensive, linked primary care physician billing data from Jan. 1 to July 28, 2020, with the same period in 2019. We identified Ontario residents with at least 1 office or virtual (telephone or video) visit during the study period. We compared trends in total physician visits, office visits and virtual visits before COVID-19 with trends after pandemic-related public health measures changed the delivery of care, according to various patient and physician characteristics. We used interrupted time series analysis to compare trends in the early and later halves of the COVID-19 period. RESULTS Compared with 2019, total primary care visits between March and July 2020 decreased by 28.0%, from 7.66 to 5.51 per 1000 people/day. The smallest declines were among patients with the highest expected health care use (8.3%), those who could not be attributed to a primary care physician (10.2%), and older adults (19.1%). In contrast, total visits in rural areas increased by 6.4%. Office visits declined by 79.1% and virtual care increased 56-fold, comprising 71.1% of primary care physician visits. The lowest uptake of virtual care was among children (57.6%), rural residents (60.6%) and physicians with panels of ≥ 2500 patients (66.0%). INTERPRETATION Primary care in Ontario saw large shifts from office to virtual care over the first 4 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Total visits declined least among those with higher health care needs. The determinants and consequences of these major shifts in care require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H Glazier
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Michael E Green
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Fangyun C Wu
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Eliot Frymire
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Alexander Kopp
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Tara Kiran
- ICES Central (Glazier, Wu, Kopp, Kiran); Primary Care and Health Systems (Glazier, Kiran, Kopp); St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Glazier, Kiran), Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine, and Health Services and Policy Research Institute (Green), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Health Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, and ICES Queen's (Frymire), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Glazier, Kiran), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vahabi M, Lofters AK, Kopp A, Glazier RH. Correlates of non-adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screen-eligible women: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:147-155. [PMID: 33392906 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01369-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers are cancers that can be detected early through screening. Despite organized cancer screening programs in Ontario, Canada participation remains low among marginalized populations. Although extensive research has been done about factors contributing to under-screening by cancer site, the predictors of under/never screened conjointly for all three types of cancer remain unknown. METHODS Using provincial-level linked administrative data sets, we examined Ontario women who were screen-eligible for all three types of cancer over a 36-month period (i.e., April 2014-March 2017) and determined how many were up to date on 0, 1, 2, and all three types of screenings. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to examine individual and structural predictors of screening with the group overdue for all screening being the reference group. RESULTS Of the 1,204,551 screen-eligible women, 15% were overdue for all. Living in the lowest income neighborhoods (AOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.45-0.47]), being recent immigrants (AOR 0.54 [95% CI 0.53-0.55]), having no primary care provider (AOR 0.17 [95% CI 0.16-0.17]), and having no contact with health care services (AOR 0.09 [95% CI 0.09-0.09]) significantly increased the likelihood of being overdue for all versus no screening type. CONCLUSIONS Considering that more than 15% of screen-eligible women in Ontario were overdue for all types of cancer screening, it is imperative to address structural barriers such as lack of a primary care provider. Innovative interventions like "one-stop shopping" where screening for different cancers can be offered at the same time could promote screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandana Vahabi
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, M5B 2K3, Canada.
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Aisha K Lofters
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Richard H Glazier
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Strauss R, Kurdyak P, Glazier RH. Mood Disorders in Late Life: A Population-based Analysis of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Consequences in Community-dwelling Older Adults in Ontario: Troubles de l'humeur en âge avancé : Une analyse dans la population de la prévalence, des facteurs de risque et des conséquences chez des adultes âgés vivant en milieu communautaire en Ontario. Can J Psychiatry 2020; 65:630-640. [PMID: 32436726 PMCID: PMC7457461 DOI: 10.1177/0706743720927812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental health issues in late life are a growing public health challenge as the population aged 65 and older rapidly increases worldwide. An updated understanding of the causes of mood disorders and their consequences in late life could guide interventions for this underrecognized and undertreated problem. We undertook a population-based analysis to quantify the prevalence of mood disorders in late life in Ontario, Canada, and to identify potential risk factors and consequences. METHOD Individuals aged 65 or older participating in 4 cycles of a nationally representative survey were included. Self-report of a diagnosed mood disorder was used as the outcome measure. Using linked administrative data, we quantified associations between mood disorder and potential risk factors such as demographic/socioeconomic factors, substance use, and comorbidity. We also determined associations between mood disorders and 5-year outcomes including health service utilization and mortality. RESULTS The prevalence of mood disorders was 6.1% (4.9% among males, 7.1% among females). Statistically significant associations with mood disorders included younger age, female sex, food insecurity, chronic opioid use, smoking, and morbidity. Individuals with mood disorders had increased odds of all consequences examined, including placement in long-term care (adjusted odds ratio [OR] =2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71 to 3.02) and death (adjusted OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.63). CONCLUSIONS Mood disorders in late life were strongly correlated with demographic and social/behavioral factors, health care use, institutionalization, and mortality. Understanding these relationships provides a basis for potential interventions to reduce the occurrence of mood disorders in late life and their consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Strauss
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, 7938University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Kurdyak
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (50010ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, 7938University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (50010ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|