1
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Peterson S, Vijh R, Price M, Schuetz C, Erickson D, Riches L, Landry G, McGrail K, Austin J, Bryan S. A Canadian Simulation Model for Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol. Pharmacoecon Open 2024; 8:493-505. [PMID: 38528312 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00481-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, often recurrent condition and a significant driver of healthcare costs. People with MDD often receive pharmacological therapy as the first-line treatment, but the majority of people require more than one medication trial to find one that relieves symptoms without causing intolerable side effects. There is an acute need for more effective interventions to improve patients' remission and quality of life and reduce the condition's economic burden on the healthcare system. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing could deliver these objectives, using genomic information to guide prescribing decisions. With an already complex and multifaceted care pathway for MDD, future evaluations of new treatment options require a flexible analytic infrastructure encompassing the entire care pathway. Individual-level simulation models are ideally suited for this purpose. We sought to develop an economic simulation model to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of PGx testing for individuals with major depression. Additionally, the model serves as an analytic infrastructure, simulating the entire patient pathway for those with MDD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Key stakeholders, including patient partners, clinical experts, researchers, and modelers, designed and developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of the clinical pathways of adults with MDD in British Columbia (BC), including all publicly-funded treatment options and multiple treatment steps. The Simulation Model of Major Depression (SiMMDep) was coded with a modular approach to enhance flexibility. The model was populated using multiple original data analyses conducted with BC administrative data, a systematic review, and an expert panel. The model accommodates newly diagnosed and prevalent adult patients with MDD in BC, with and without PGx-guided treatment. SiMMDep comprises over 1500 parameters in eight modules: entry cohort, demographics, disease progression, treatment, adverse events, hospitalization, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (payoff), and mortality. The model predicts health outcomes and estimates costs from a health system perspective. In addition, the model can incorporate interactive decision nodes to address different implementation strategies for PGx testing (or other interventions) along the clinical pathway. We conducted various forms of model validation (face, internal, and cross-validity) to ensure the correct functioning and expected results of SiMMDep. CONCLUSION SiMMDep is Canada's first medication-specific, discrete-time microsimulation model for the treatment of MDD. With patient partner collaboration guiding its development, it incorporates realistic care journeys. SiMMDep synthesizes existing information and incorporates provincially-specific data to predict the benefits and costs associated with PGx testing. These predictions estimate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, resource utilization, and health gains of PGx testing compared with the current standard of care. However, the flexible analytic infrastructure can be adapted to support other policy questions and facilitate the rapid synthesis of new data for a broader search for efficiency improvements in the clinical field of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary Bunka
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sonya Cressman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tania Conte
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rohit Vijh
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Morgan Price
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christian Schuetz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David Erickson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Psychology Department, Fraser Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adelakun AR, De Vera MA, McGrail K, Turgeon RD, Barry AR, Andrade JG, MacGillivray J, Deyell MW, Kwan L, Chua D, Lum E, Smith R, Loewen P. Development and Application of an Attribute-Based Taxonomy on the Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Switching in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delphi Study. Adv Ther 2024:10.1007/s12325-024-02859-0. [PMID: 38658484 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02859-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often switch between oral anticoagulants (OACs). It can be hard to know why a patient has switched outside of a clinical setting. Medication attribute comparisons can suggest benefits. Consensus on terms and definitions is required for inferring OAC switch benefits. The objectives of the study were to generate consensus on a taxonomy of the potential benefits of OAC switching in patients with AF and apply the taxonomy to real-world data. METHODS Nine expert clinicians (seven clinical pharmacists, two cardiologists) with at least 3 years of clinical and research experience in AF participated in a Delphi process. The experts rated and commented on a proposed taxonomy on the potential benefits of OAC switching. After each Delphi round, ratings were analyzed with the RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness method. Median ratings, disagreement index, and comments were used to modify the taxonomy. The resulting taxonomy from the Delphi process was applied to a cohort of patients with AF who switched OACs in a population-based administrative health dataset from 1996 to 2019 in British Columbia, Canada. RESULTS The taxonomy was finalized in two Delphi rounds, reaching consensus on five switch benefit categories: safety, effectiveness, convenience, economic considerations, and drug interactions. Safety benefit (a switch that could lower the risk of adverse drug events) had three subcategories: major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Effectiveness benefit had four subcategories: stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality. Real-world OAC switches revealed that more OAC switches had convenience (72.6%) and drug interaction (63.0%) benefits compared to effectiveness (SSE 22.0%, ischemic stroke 11.1%, MI 3.1%, all-cause mortality 10.1%), safety (major bleeding 24.3%, GI bleeding 10.6%, ICH 48.5%), and economic benefits (12.1%). CONCLUSIONS The Delphi-based taxonomy identified five criteria for the beneficial effects of OAC switching, aiding in characterizing real-world OAC switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adenike R Adelakun
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- UBC Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mary A De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- UBC Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- UBC School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, Canada
- UBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ricky D Turgeon
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- UBC Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Arden R Barry
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada
- Jim Pattison Outpatient Care and Surgery Centre, Surrey, Canada
| | - Jason G Andrade
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Marc W Deyell
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Leanne Kwan
- Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, Canada
| | | | - Elaine Lum
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Peter Loewen
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
- UBC Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, Canada.
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Price M, Schuetz C, Riches L, Landry G, Erickson D, McGrail K, Peterson S, Vijh R, Hoens AM, Austin J, Bryan S. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided treatment for major depression. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1499-E1508. [PMID: 37963621 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomic testing to identify variations in genes that influence metabolism of antidepressant medications can enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects of pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder. We sought to establish the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomic testing to guide prescription of antidepressants. METHODS We developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of care pathways for major depressive disorder in British Columbia, Canada, to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic testing from the public payer's perspective over 20 years. The model included unique patient characteristics (e.g., metabolizer phenotypes) and used estimates derived from systematic reviews, analyses of administrative data (2015-2020) and expert judgment. We estimated incremental costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for a representative cohort of patients with major depressive disorder in BC. RESULTS Pharmacogenomic testing, if implemented in BC for adult patients with moderate-severe major depressive disorder, was predicted to save the health system $956 million ($4926 per patient) and bring health gains of 0.064 life-years and 0.381 QALYs per patient (12 436 life-years and 74 023 QALYs overall over 20 yr). These savings were mainly driven by slowing or avoiding the transition to refractory (treatment-resistant) depression. Pharmacogenomic-guided care was associated with 37% fewer patients with refractory depression over 20 years. Sensitivity analyses estimated that costs of pharmacogenomic testing would be offset within about 2 years of implementation. INTERPRETATION Pharmacogenomic testing to guide antidepressant use was estimated to yield population health gains while substantially reducing health system costs. These findings suggest that pharmacogenomic testing offers health systems an opportunity for a major value-promoting investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mary Bunka
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Louisa Edwards
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sonya Cressman
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Tania Conte
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Morgan Price
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Christian Schuetz
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Linda Riches
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ginny Landry
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - David Erickson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kim McGrail
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sandra Peterson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Rohit Vijh
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Alison M Hoens
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jehannine Austin
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Stirling Bryan
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoben M, Hogan DB, Poss JW, Gruneir A, McGrail K, Griffith LE, Chamberlain SA, Estabrooks CA, Maxwell CJ. Comparing quality of care outcomes between assisted living and nursing homes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:3467-3479. [PMID: 37428008 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While assisted living (AL) and nursing home (NHs) residents in share vulnerabilities, AL provides fewer staffing resources and services. Research has largely neglected AL, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study compared trends of practice-sensitive, risk-adjusted quality indicators between AL and NHs, and changes in these trends after the start of the pandemic. METHODS This repeated cross-sectional study used population-based resident data in Alberta, Canada. Using Resident Assessment Instrument data (01/2017-12/2021), we created quarterly cohorts, using each resident's latest assessment in each quarter. We applied validated inclusion/exclusion criteria and risk-adjustments to create nine quality indicators and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs): potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use, pain, depressive symptoms, total dependency in late-loss activities of daily living, physical restraint use, pressure ulcers, delirium, weight loss, urinary tract infections. Run charts compared quality indicators between AL and NHs over time and segmented regressions assessed whether these trends changed after the start of the pandemic. RESULTS Quarterly samples included 2015-2710 AL residents and 12,881-13,807 NH residents. Antipsychotic use (21%-26%), pain (20%-24%), and depressive symptoms (17%-25%) were most common in AL. In NHs, they were physical dependency (33%-36%), depressive symptoms (26%-32%), and antipsychotic use (17%-22%). Antipsychotic use and pain were consistently higher in AL. Depressive symptoms, physical dependency, physical restraint use, delirium, weight loss were consistently lower in AL. The most notable segmented regression findings were an increase in antipsychotic use during the pandemic in both settings (AL: change in slope = 0.6% [95% CI: 0.1%-1.0%], p = 0.0140; NHs: change in slope = 0.4% [95% CI: 0.3%-0.5%], p < 0.0001), and an increase in physical dependency in AL only (change in slope = 0.5% [95% CI: 0.1%-0.8%], p = 0.0222). CONCLUSIONS QIs differed significantly between AL and NHs before and during the pandemic. Any changes implemented to address deficiencies in either setting need to account for these differences and require monitoring to assess their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Hoben
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David B Hogan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jeffrey W Poss
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Gruneir
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lauren E Griffith
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Chamberlain
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Colleen J Maxwell
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoben M, Keefe J, McGrail K, Lacey A, Taylor D, Maxwell CJ. Letter to the Editor Re: Manis DR, Bronskill SE, Rochon PA, et al. Defining the Assisted Living Sector in Canada: An Environmental Scan. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(11):1871-1877.e1. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2023; 24:1094-1096. [PMID: 37247821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Hoben
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Janice Keefe
- Department of Family Studies and Gerontology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Allison Lacey
- Continuing Care Branch, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Deanne Taylor
- Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Canada; Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, BC, Canada; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Colleen J Maxwell
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoben M, Li W, Dampf H, Hogan DB, Corbett K, Chamberlain SA, McGrail K, Griffith LE, Gruneir A, Lane NE, Baumbusch J, Maxwell C. Caregiver Involvement and Concerns with Care of Residents of Assisted Living before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gerontology 2023; 69:839-851. [PMID: 37068467 DOI: 10.1159/000530622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family/friend caregivers play an essential role in promoting the physical and mental health of older adults in need of care - especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and especially in assisted living (AL) homes, where resident care needs are similarly complex as in long-term care homes but fewer staffing resources and services are available. However, little research is available on caregiver involvement and concerns with care of AL residents prior to and during waves 1 and 2 of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study addressed this important knowledge gap. METHODS This prospective cohort study used baseline and follow-up online surveys with primary caregivers to AL residents in Western Canada who were 65 years or older and had lived in the AL home for at least 3 months before Mar 1, 2020. Surveys assessed the following outcomes in the 3 months prior to and during waves 1 and 2 of the pandemic: sociodemographics, 5 ways of visiting or communicating with residents, involvement in 16 care tasks, concerns with 9 resident physical/mental health conditions, perceived lack of resident access to 7 care services, and whether caregivers felt well informed and involved with resident care. RESULTS Based on 386 caregiver responses, in-person visits dropped significantly in wave 1 of the pandemic and so did caregiver involvement in nearly all care tasks. While these rates increased in wave 2, most did not return to pre-pandemic levels. Correspondingly, caregiver concerns (already high before the pandemic) substantially increased in wave 1 and stayed high in wave 2. These were particularly elevated among caregivers who did not feel well informed/involved with resident care. CONCLUSIONS Restricted in-person visiting disrupted resident care and was associated with worse perceptions of resident health and well-being. Continued caregiver involvement in resident care and communication with caregivers even during lockdowns is key to mitigating these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Hoben
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wenshan Li
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hana Dampf
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David B Hogan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kyle Corbett
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Chamberlain
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lauren E Griffith
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Gruneir
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natasha E Lane
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer Baumbusch
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Colleen Maxwell
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rudoler D, Peterson S, Stock D, Taylor C, Wilton D, Blackie D, Burge F, Glazier RH, Goldsmith L, Grudniewicz A, Hedden L, Jamieson M, Katz A, MacKenzie A, Marshall E, McCracken R, McGrail K, Scott I, Wong ST, Lavergne MR. Changes over time in patient visits and continuity of care among graduating cohorts of family physicians in 4 Canadian provinces. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1639-E1646. [PMID: 36511867 PMCID: PMC9828986 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lack of patient access to family physicians in Canada is a concern. The role of recent physician graduates in this problem of supply of primary care services has not been established. We sought to establish whether career stage or graduation cohort were related to family physician practice volume and continuity of care over time. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of family physician practice from 1997/98 to 2017/18. We collected administrative health and physician claims data in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia. We included all physicians who registered with their respective provincial regulatory colleges as having a medical specialty of family practice or who had billed the provincial health insurance system for patient care as family physicians, or both. We used regression models to isolate the effects of 3-year categories of years in practice (at all career stages), time period and cohort on patient contacts and physician-level continuity of care. RESULTS Between 1997/98 and 2017/18, the median number of patient contacts per provider per year fell by between 515 and 1736 contacts in the 4 provinces examined. Median contacts peaked at 27-29 years in practice in all provinces, and median physician-level continuity of care increased until 30 or more years in practice. We found no association between graduation cohort and patient contacts or physician-level continuity of care. INTERPRETATION Recent cohorts of family physicians practise similarly to their predecessors in terms of practice volumes and continuity of care. Because family physicians of all career stages showed declining patient contacts, we suggest that system-wide solutions to recent challenges in the accessibility of primary care in Canada are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Rudoler
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - David Stock
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont.
| | - Carole Taylor
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Drew Wilton
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Doug Blackie
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Fred Burge
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Laurie Goldsmith
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Margaret Jamieson
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Adrian MacKenzie
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Emily Marshall
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Rita McCracken
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Kim McGrail
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Ian Scott
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sabrina T Wong
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| | - M Ruth Lavergne
- Faculty of Health Sciences (Rudoler), Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ont.; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Rudoler), Whitby, Ont.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail, Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Stock, MacKenzie), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (Taylor), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Wilton, Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; School of Leadership Studies (Blackie), Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC; Department of Family Medicine (Burge, Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; St. Michael's Hospital (Glazier), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Health Sciences (Goldsmith, Hedden), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; GoldQual Consulting (Goldsmith), Toronto, Ont.; Telfer School of Management (Grudniewicz), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Jamieson), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Departments of Family Medicine (Katz) and Community Health Sciences (Katz), Winnipeg, Man.; Nova Scotia Health Authority (MacKenzie, Marshall), Halifax, NS; Department of Family Medicine (Marshall), Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Family Practice (McCracken, Scott), and Centre for Health Education Scholarship (Scott), and School of Nursing (Wong), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; National Institute of Nursing Research (Wong), Bethesda, Md.; Tier II Primary Care (Lavergne), Canada Research Chairs Program, Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Norman WV, Darling E, Kaczorowski J, Dunn S, Schummers L, Law M, McGrail K. P031Mifepristone as a normal prescription rapidly increased rural and urban providers. Contraception 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
9
|
Adelakun A, Turgeon R, De Vera M, Harrison M, McGrail K, Salmasi S, Safari A, Loewen P. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A TAXONOMY ON THE BENEFITS OF ORAL ANTICOAGULANT SWITCHING IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. Can J Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.08.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
10
|
Paprica A, McGrail K, Crichlow M, Maillet DC, Kesselring S, Pow C, Scarnecchia T, Schull M. Public Engagement and other Essential Requirements for Data Trusts, Data Repositories and Other Data Collaborations. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [PMCID: PMC9645057 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
11
|
Lavergne MR, King C, Peterson S, Simon L, Hudon C, Loignon C, McCracken RK, Brackett A, McGrail K, Strumpf E. Patient characteristics associated with enrolment under voluntary programs implemented within fee-for-service systems in British Columbia and Quebec: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E64-E73. [PMID: 35105683 PMCID: PMC8812717 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of information on patient characteristics associated with enrolment under voluntary programs (e.g. incentive payments) implemented within fee-for-service systems. We explored patient characteristics associated with enrolment under these programs in British Columbia and Quebec. METHODS We used linked administrative data and a cross-sectional design to compare people aged 40 years or more enrolled under voluntary programs to those who were eligible but not enrolled. We examined 2 programs in Quebec (enrolment of vulnerable patients with qualifying conditions [implemented in 2003] and enrolment of the general population [2009]) and 3 in BC (Chronic disease incentive [2003], Complex care incentive [2007] and enrolment of the general population [A GP for Me, 2013]). We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of enrolment by neighbourhood income, rural versus urban residence, previous treatment for mental illness, previous treatment for substance use disorder and use of health care services before program implementation, controlling for characteristics linked to program eligibility. RESULTS In Quebec, we identified 1 569 010 people eligible for the vulnerable enrolment program (of whom 505 869 [32.2%] were enrolled within the first 2 yr of program implementation) and 2 394 923 for the general enrolment program (of whom 352 380 [14.7%] were enrolled within the first 2 yr). In BC, we identified 133 589 people eligible for the Chronic disease incentive, 47 619 for the Complex care incentive and 1 349 428 for A GP for Me; of these, 60 764 (45.5%), 28 273 (59.4%) and 1 066 714 (79.0%), respectively, were enrolled within the first 2 years. The odds of enrolment were higher in higher-income neighbourhoods for programs without enrolment criteria (adjusted odds ratio [OR] comparing highest to lowest quintiles 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.23] in Quebec and 1.67 [95% CI 1.64-1.69] in BC) but were similar across neighbourhood income quintiles for programs with health-related eligibility criteria. The odds of enrolment by urban versus rural location varied by program. People treated for substance use disorders had lower odds of enrolment in all programs (adjusted OR 0.60-0.72). Compared to people eligible but not enrolled, those enrolled had similar or higher numbers of primary care visits and longitudinal continuity of care in the year before enrolment. INTERPRETATION People living in lower-income neighbourhoods and those treated for substance use disorders were less likely than people in higher-income neighbourhoods and those not treated for such disorders to be enrolled in programs without health-related eligibility criteria. Other strategies are needed to promote equitable access to primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ruth Lavergne
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
| | - Caroline King
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Leora Simon
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Christine Loignon
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Rita K McCracken
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Austyn Brackett
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Kim McGrail
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| | - Erin Strumpf
- Department of Family Medicine (Lavergne), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (King, Simon, Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (King), Québec, Que.; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Peterson, McGrail), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Hudon) and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Loignon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Department of Family Practice (McCracken), University of British Columbia; Department of Family Medicine (McCracken), Providence Health Care; Patient Voices Network (Brackett), Vancouver, BC; Department of Economics (Strumpf), McGill University, Montréal, Que
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khan A, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Peacock S, Chan K, Burge F, McGrail K, Lawson B, Raymakers A, Barbera L. 42: Understanding End-of-Life Cancer Care in Canada: an Updated 12-Year Retrospective Analysis of Three Provinces’ Administrative Health Care Data. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08920-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
13
|
Seow H, Sutradhar R, Barbera LC, Guthrie D, McGrail K, Burge F, Peacock S, Chan KK. Does early palliative care reduce end-of-life hospital costs? A propensity-score matched, population-based, cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.12006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12006 Background: Few studies describe how early versus late palliative care affects end-of-life health services costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early vs not-early palliative care among cancer decedents on the combined costs of receiving aggressive care (ED/hospitalization) and supportive care (home care/physician home visit). Methods: Using linked administrative databases, we created a retrospective cohort of cancer decedents between 2004 -2014 in Ontario, Canada. We identified those who received “early” palliative care (palliative care service used in the hospital or community 12 to 6 months before death [exposure]). We used propensity score matching to identify a control group of “not-early” palliative care, hard matched on age, sex, cancer type and stage. The propensity score included region, year, treatment, etc. We examined differences in median costs (including hospital, ED, physician, and home care costs) between pairs in the last month of life. Results: We identified 144,306 cancer decedents, of which 37% received early palliative care in the exposure period. After propensity score matching, we created 36,238 pairs of decedents who received early and not-early palliative care. After matching the early and not-early groups had equal distributions of age, sex, cancer type (24% lung cancer) and stage (25% stage 3 or 4). Among those who received early palliative care, 56.3% used hospital in-patient care in the last month, whereas 66.7% of the control group (not-early palliative care) used in-patient care; considering only inpatient hospital costs, those receiving early palliative care used a median of $2,894 in the last month of life compared to the control group of $5,311 (p < 0.001). Overall median costs in the last month of life for patients in the early palliative care vs the control group was $11,129 vs. $10,598 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our population-based, propensity-score matched, cohort study of cancer decedents, receiving early palliative care reduced the median overall health system costs, especially via avoiding hospitalizations in the last month of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Dawn Guthrie
- Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Kelvin K. Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ark TK, Kesselring S, Hills B, McGrail K. Population Data BC: Supporting population data science in British Columbia. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPopulation Data BC (PopData) was established as a multi-university data and education resourceto support training and education, data linkage, and access to individual level, de-identified data forresearch in a wide variety of areas including human and community development and well-being.
ApproachA combination of deterministic and probabilistic linkage is conducted based on the quality andavailability of identifiers for data linkage. PopData utilizes a harmonized data request and approvalprocess for data stewards and researchers to increase efficiency and ease of access to linked data.Researchers access linked data through a secure research environment (SRE) that is equipped witha wide variety of tools for analysis. The SRE also allows for ongoing management and control ofdata. PopData continues to expand its data holdings and to evolve its services as well as governanceand data access process.
DiscussionPopData has provided efficient and cost-effective access to linked data sets for research. After twodecades of learning, future planned developments for the organization include, but are not limitedto, policies to facilitate programs of research, access to reusable datasets, evaluation and use of newdata linkage techniques such as privacy preserving record linkage (PPRL).
ConclusionPopData continues to maintain and grow the number and type of data holdings available for research.Its existing models support a number of large-scale research projects and demonstrate the benefitsof having a third-party data linkage and provisioning center for research purposes. Building furtherconnections with existing data holders and governing bodies will be important to ensure ongoingaccess to data and changes in policy exist to facilitate access for researchers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
High-performing and equitable healthcare systems are influenced by the strength of primary healthcare (PHC), which means that there should be special attention on this sector because we are changing how we monitor and improve overall care. Comprehensive data are the foundation for actionable information and are urgently needed in PHC because of the heterogeneity in both the demographics and the healthcare needs of the populations served. An ideal information system would combine multiple data sources such as electronic medical records (EMRs), administrative data and patient-reported information, drawing on the strengths of each to develop a comprehensive view of PHC. The purpose of this commentary is to draw attention to data gaps and offer suggestions about where and how this information could be obtained. Linked patient experience, EMRs and administrative data could be used in a learning health system to support decisions at the practice level and the jurisdictional level, where resources (financial and human) can be deployed to improve the quality of care, particularly when care is needed across sectors. The information gained from the analysis of these data are of high value for clinician/practice quality improvement efforts and for regional and jurisdictional health system planning and resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina T Wong
- Professor, Centre for Health Services Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sharon Johnston
- Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Bruyère Research Institute and Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON
| | - Fred Burge
- Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - Kim McGrail
- Professor, Centre for Health Services Research and School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alsabbagh MW, Kueper JK, Wong ST, Burge F, Johnston S, Peterson S, Lawson B, Chung H, Bennett M, Blackman S, McGrail K, Campbell J, Hogg W, Glazier R. Development of comparable algorithms to measure primary care indicators using administrative health data across three Canadian provinces. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1340. [PMID: 33644408 PMCID: PMC7893851 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Performance measurement has been recognized as key to transforming primary care (PC). Yet, performance reporting in PC lags behind even though high-performing PC is foundational to an effective and efficient health care system. OBJECTIVES We used administrative data from three Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia, to: 1) identify and develop a core set of PC performance indicators using administrative data and 2) examine their ability to capture PC performance. METHODS Administrative data used included Physician Billings, Discharge Abstract Database, the National Ambulatory Care and Reporting System database, Census and Vital Statistics. Indicators were compiled based on a literature review of PC indicators previously developed with administrative data available in Canada (n=158). We engaged in iterative discussions to assess data conformity, completeness, and plausibility of results in all jurisdictions. Challenges to creating comparable algorithms were examined through content analysis and research team discussions, which included clinicians, analysts, and health services researchers familiar with PC. RESULTS Our final list included 21 PC performance indicators pertaining to 1) technical care (n=4), 2) continuity of care (n=6), and 3) health services utilization (n=11). Establishing comparable algorithms across provinces was possible though time intensive. A major challenge was inconsistent data elements. Ease of data access, and a deep understanding of the data and practice context, was essential for selecting the most appropriate data elements. CONCLUSIONS This project is unique in creating algorithms to measure PC performance across provinces. It was essential to balance internal validity of the indicators within a province and external validity across provinces. The intuitive desire of having the exact same coding across provinces was infeasible due to lack of standardized PC data. Rather, a context-tailored definition was developed for each jurisdiction. This work serves as an example for developing comparable PC performance indicators across different provincial/territorial jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - ST Wong
- University of British Columbia
| | | | - S Johnston
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - W Hogg
- University of Ottawa, Montfort Hospital Research Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wada M, Chaudhury H, McGrail K, Whitehurst D, Lalji K. CLIENTS’ AND CAREGIVERS’ EXPERIENCES OF A COMMUNITY-BASED SUPPORT SERVICE PROGRAM “BETTER AT HOME”. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Wada
- Simon Fraser University STAR Institute
| | | | - K McGrail
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia
| | - D Whitehurst
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lavergne MR, Hedden L, Law MR, McGrail K, Ahuja M, Barer M. The impact of the 2008/2009 financial crisis on specialist physician activity in Canada. Health Econ 2018; 27:1859-1867. [PMID: 29920841 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Fee-for-service physicians are responsible for planning for their retirements, and there is no mandated retirement age. Changes in financial markets may influence how long they remain in practice and how much they choose to work. The 2008 crisis provides a natural experiment to analyze elasticity in physician service supply in response to dramatic financial market changes. We examined quarterly fee-for-service data for specialist physicians over the period from 1999/2000 to 2013/2014 in Canada. We used segmented regression to estimate changes in the number of physicians receiving payments, per-physician service counts, and per-physician payments following the 2008 financial crisis and explored whether patterns differed by physician age. The number of specialist physicians increased more rapidly in the period since 2008 than in earlier years, but increases were largest within the youngest age group, and we observed no evidence of delayed retirement among older physicians. Where changes in service volume and payments were observed, they occurred across all ages and not immediately following the 2008 financial crisis. We conclude that any response to the financial crisis was small compared with demographic shifts in the physician population and changes in payments per service over the same time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ruth Lavergne
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael R Law
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Megan Ahuja
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Morris Barer
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Performance measurement must be meaningful to those being asked to contribute data and to the clinicians who are collecting the information. It must be actionable if performance measurement and reporting is to influence health system transformation. To date, measuring patient experiences in all parts of the healthcare system in Canada lags behind other countries. More attention needs to be paid to capturing patients with complex intersecting health and social problems that result from inequitable distribution of wealth and/or underlying structural inequities related to systemic issues such as racism and discrimination, colonialism and patriarchy. Efforts to better capture the experiences of patients who do not regularly access care and who speak English or French as a second language are also needed. Before investing heavily into collecting patient experience data as part of a performance measurement system the following ought to be considered: (1) ensuring value for and buy-in from clinicians who are being asked to collect the data and/or act on the results; (2) investment in the infrastructure to administer iterative, cost-effective patient/family experience data collection, analysis and reporting (e.g., automated software tools) and (3) incorporating practice support (e.g., facilitation) and health system opportunities to integrate the findings from patient experience surveys into policy and practice. Investment into the infrastructure of measuring, reporting and engaging clinicians in improving practice is needed for patient/caregiver experiences to be acted upon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina T Wong
- Centre for Health Services Research and School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sharon Johnston
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | - Fred Burge
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - William Hogg
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Montfort Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Smith M, McGrail K, Schull M, Katz A, McDonald T, Paprica PA, Victor JC, Lix L, Chateau D, Diverty B. Pan-Canadian Real-World Health Data Network: Building a National Data Platform. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionResearchers and decision makers from across Canada use linked provincial administrative data for analysis and to address research and policy questions. Currently there are several impediments to working harmoniously across provincial boundaries. A group of academic and policy researchers are working to address these multi-jurisdictional obstacles.
Objectives and ApproachResearchers and data organizations from across Canada are working together as the Pan-Canadian Real-World Health Data Network PRHDN). PRHDN aims to: (1) create harmonized data, algorithms and analytic protocols, and (2) link administrative databases to other types of data, including electronic medical records, clinical trials records, “omics data” and records from pan-Canadian cohort studies. PRHDN’s vision is to construct a unified, documented infrastructure to advance pan-Canadian population-based research and analysis. This presentation incorporates material that is part of PRHDN’s response to a funding call to create national, collaborative infrastructure.
ResultsScientists and staff at PRHDN organizations will create three main categories of infrastructure: 1) Algorithms: Reusable processes, ideally in the form of documented code, which implement a common approach or definition, e.g. to define cases or to create derived variables; 2) Harmonized Common Data: Based on the Sentinel model, we will establish a standardized subset of harmonized common data that are analysis-ready; 3) Common Analytic Protocols: Complementing work of the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), we will establish processes for distributed analysis with common analytic protocols and meta-analysis of results to provide pan-Canadian estimates. Source data would remain within jurisdictional boundaries and only aggregate results would be pooled across jurisdictions. Details of these approaches will be presented.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThis initiative will improve coordinated access to distributed data from across Canada that is built once then used by many stakeholders for a variety of purposes including: research, benchmarking, performance monitoring to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement, multi-jurisdictional evaluations of novel interventions and inter-jurisdictional comparisons.
Collapse
|
21
|
Teng J, McGrail K, Bentley C, Burgess M, O'Doherty K. Public views and recommendations on the use of linked data for research: preliminary results from a public deliberation engagement. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe use of linked data for research is increasing, including in complexity of requests. Rules around access to and use of data necessarily trade-off risks related to privacy to achieve social benefits. Including informed and civic-minded public recommendations that consider different perspectives on privacy and benefit will improve related policy.
Objectives and ApproachPopulation Data BC is conducting a deliberative public engagement regarding the use of complex linked data for research. Members of the public will be provided with written materials and hear speakers outlining considerations from multiple perspectives in data access and use, including benefits for health research, risks to privacy, and implications for disability and minority groups. Participants in the deliberation will then discuss questions about the use of linked data and ideas around principles for that use in small and large groups, and develop recommendations for data sharing policies.
ResultsWe will be sharing our preliminary analysis of the public deliberation results at the conference. The public deliberation encourages the participants to develop policy recommendations that respect diversity of perspectives while negotiating constructive advice. It asks the group to make recommendations and to identify and explore issues on which the group has persistent disagreement. We will discuss insights into how the public values the use of data linkage and under what conditions such use becomes problematic. For example, we are hoping to gain insight about how publics determine if a project is in the public interest, or conversely, how a project may pose unacceptable harm.
Conclusion/ImplicationsChanges in available data and increasing ability to link data makes it essential to include public views in systems of data access governance. Understanding the hopes and concerns of the public regarding the use of linked data for research will help develop data access regulations that reflect wide public interests.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kesselring S, Galo J, Sanderson K, Wong S, Neuman M, Mintha J, McGrail K. BC Data ScoutTM: A New Tool To Investigate Datasets For Health Research. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionBC’s Ministry of Health (MOH) maintains many administrative databases with rich information and analytical potential. Researchers are keen to use these data for both discovery and applied research. Historically, limited views of data availability and populations therein have supported study feasibility. Therefore, we developed BC Data ScoutTM, a cohort browser.
Objectives and ApproachWe developed a cohort browser service to provide information to researchers planning a study using MOH data. The objective was to create a tool that is simple to use, provides quick results and is free to users to encourage its use. A better understanding of the data available can improve study quality and expand the user-base by giving researchers access to information not previously available during the planning stages. The tool will be evaluated by examining the number of requests received and a user satisfaction survey. Plans are in place to expand into additional data sources and extend query sophistication.
ResultsThe BC Data ScoutTM online tool provides cohort information in the form of highly aggregated, approximate results to researchers planning a study. It was developed by the MOH, the BC SUPPORT Unit and Population Data BC (PopData) and was launched in February 2018. The service is delivered by PopData. BC Data ScoutTM offers province-wide information for query, is accessible to a wide group of eligible researchers, and has data availability from the year 2000 onwards. Four types of MOH data are available for query: hospital data; physician data; pharmaceutical data; and demographics. In addition to determining study feasibility, the aggregate reports also help to further refine a full data access request and provide enough information to complete and strengthen a funding application.
Conclusion/ImplicationsBC Data ScoutTM will be beneficial for researchers planning to request data. This preliminary information may increase the chances of meaningful research studies to obtain funding, and the production of relevant, high-quality research results. BC will be among the first jurisdictions across Canada to offer this type of feasibility service.
Collapse
|
23
|
Teng J, McGrail K. Cultural and institutional barriers among data stewards regarding data access for research. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionIn British Columbia, the rules and procedures that data stewards follow to adjudicate data access requests (DAR) vary considerably. These variations can lead to discrepancies in the speed at which DARs are processed. With complex DARs involving numerous data stewards and data sets, the request may take over a year
Objectives and ApproachOur main goal was to understand the institutional and cultural factors that influence data stewards when processing a DAR. We wished to see in particular if risk aversion was playing a role when making decisions about data access. We interviewed 24 people representing 21 organizations in British Columbia. Most were data stewards, but we also interviewed people processing the data requests and also privacy advisors.
ResultsWe found that organizations varied greatly in terms of their skills and expertise regarding the rules and procedures around processing DARs. In particular, data stewards noted that they experienced differences in interpreting legislation, resulting in disagreements when they were working with other data stewards. In terms of risk aversion, data stewards stated they wished to encourage research, but in some cases followed unclear rules. Nearly all noted that there is little guidance provided for the job of “data steward” and either no or very little training when taking on these positions.
Conclusion/ImplicationsWhile there may be stated governmental policies promoting that linked data be used for research, ultimately it is the data stewards approving DARs that will determine access to data. Understanding how and why they make those decisions will help better implement data access policies.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kesselring S, Mander B, Djurdjev O, Moselle K, Portales-Casamar E, Schuckel V, Singer J, Sobolev B, Wong S, Brasher P, Cherban E, Young E, Sanderson K, Neuman M, Moran K, Enjo D, McGrail K. The BC SUPPORT Unit Data Platform: Offering Data-Related Services To Researchers In British Columbia. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and provinces co-fund local Units to increase the quality and quantity of patient-oriented research. These SUPPORT (Support for People and Patient-Oriented Research and Trials) Units include a prominent Data Plan component. The BC Plan is the result of collaboration between many organizational partners.
Objectives and ApproachA Data Advisory Committee comprised of eight organizational partners worked together for several months in 2016-2017 to develop BC’s provincial Data Plan. The Data Plan includes seven objectives; in general, the plan seeks to make additional data available for research, increase the speed and transparency of data access, and offer services to enable more efficient data use. The services resulting from the Data Plan are intended to improve support for the entire continuum of a research project, from developing a research question to analyzing the results. Several projects are part of Ministry of Health-led work developing a Health Data Platform.
ResultsThe projects initiated so far as part of the Data Plan include:
BC Data Scout\textsuperscript{TM}: an online tool that provides aggregate cohort information to inform research question development;
REDCap: software to support privacy-sensitive data collection and management;
INFORM: software to support data collection for complex clinical research studies and trials;
Direct Access: enables Population Data BC to access BC Ministry of Health databases so researchers have access to up-to-date data;
Streamlining: making the data request process more efficient;
New datasets: several projects that will provide new data sources, including patient experience and outcome measures and secondary use data drawn from electronic medical records; and
Inventory: an online catalog for all high-value and linkable data sets available to researchers.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThe services and tools included in BC’s Data Plan will help researchers develop and deliver world-class research and inform important health care decisions. The patient-oriented focus of these services help to ensure that research is done in partnership with patients and centered on research questions that matter to them.
Collapse
|
25
|
McGrail K, Jones K. Population Data Science: The science of data about people. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionSocietal and individual benefits of data-intensive science are substantial but raise challenges of balancing individual privacy and public good, while building appropriate governance and socio-technical systems to support data-intensive science. We set out to define a new field of inquiry to move collective interests forward.
Objectives and ApproachOur objectives were: 1. To create a concise definition of the emerging field of Population Data Science; 2. To highlight the characteristics and challenges of Population Data Science; 3. To differentiate Population Data Science from existing fields of data science and informatics; and 4. To discuss the implications and future opportunities for Population Data Science. Objectives 1 and 2 were met largely through International Population Data Linkage Network (IPDLN) member engagement, Objective 3 was evaluated via literature review, and Objective 4 was achieved through iterative and collective work on a peer-reviewed position paper.
ResultsWe define Population Data Science succinctly as the science of data about people. It is related to, but distinct from, the fields of data science and informatics. A broader definition includes four characteristics of: i) data use for positive impact on individuals and populations; ii) bringing together and analyzing data from multiple sources; iii) identifying population-level insights; and iv) developing safe, privacy-sensitive and ethical infrastructure to support research. One implication of these characteristics is that few individuals or organisations possess all of the requisite knowledge and skills comprising Population Data Science, so this is by nature a multi-disciplinary “team science” field. There is a need to advance various aspects of science, such as data linkage technology, various forms of analytics, and methods of public engagement.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThese implications are the beginnings of a research agenda for Population Data Science, which if approached as a collective field, will catalyze significant advances in our understanding of society, health, and human behavior and increase the impact of our research.
Collapse
|
26
|
Wong S, Katz A, Williamson T, Peterson S, Taylor C, McGrail K. Can Linked Electronic Medical Record and Administrative Data Help Us Identify Those Living With Frailty? Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionFrailty is a combination of factors that increase vulnerability to functional decline, dependence and/or death. Frailty cannot easily be defined by comorbidities or medical treatment alone. Accurate detection of frailty in practice and at a population level is needed. This may be achieved using a combination of data sources.
Objectives and ApproachWe construct algorithms that can identify frailty using electronic medical record (EMR) and administrative data. We linked EMR data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) nodes and the administrative (e.g. billings, hospitalizations) from Population Data BC and the Manitoba Health Policy Centre. Frailty was defined as individuals 65+ who were receiving home services, had specific chronic conditions, received specific diagnoses, and/or had specific lab or other clinical indicators. We describe sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors, prescribed medications, use and costs of healthcare for those identified as frail.
ResultsPeople were identified as frail in 2014 and all analysis was completed with 2015 data. Among those who were > 65 years, who had a record in both EMR and administrative data, 5\%-8\% (n=191 of 3,553, BC; n=2,396 of 29,382, MB) were identified as frail. There was a higher likelihood of being frail with increasing age and being a woman. In BC, those identified as frail have higher contacts with primary care (n=20 vs. n=10) and more days in hospital (n=7.4 vs. n=2.0) compared to those who are not frail. Twenty two percent of those identified as frail in 2014 died in 2015, compared to a mortality rate of 2\% among those who are not frail.
Conclusion/ImplicationsIdentifying and reporting on those who are frail in primary care as well as in communities could enable targeted communications with patients and families and community based resources in order to improve patient care, patients’ and caregivers’ quality of life and better use of the healthcare system.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jorm LR, McGrail K, Victor JC, Jones K, Ford D, Churches T. Secure data analysis environments: can we agree on criteria for “Appropriate secure access” to linked health data? Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Overall objectives or goalMany health data linkage ecosystems across the world have designed and implemented secure data analysis environments as one of their controls to protect patient privacy and confidentiality. These have been shaped by local legislation and data governance policies, available IT infrastructure and resources, and the skills and imagination of their architects. However, at present their various features and functionalities have not been reviewed, synthesised or contrasted. Burton et al [1] have proposed 12 criteria for Data Safe Havens in health and healthcare, which they conceptualise broadly as encompassing data governance and ethics, quality and curation of data repositories, and data security. Under this definition, secure analysis environments, which may or may not be integrated with data repositories, are a component of a Data Safe Haven, addressing the criterion “Appropriate secure access to individually identifying data”. To guide those building and operating these environments, and data custodians and stewards who need to assess their fitness-for-purpose, it would be of great value to discuss and agree an aggregate term (e.g. “Secure Data Lab”) that describes them, and to develop a more detailed set of criteria for what entails “Appropriate secure access” to linked health data.
The goal of this session is to describe and document the approaches that have been taken by flagship secure data analysis environments internationally, including their approaches to authentication, assigning permissions, managing the ingress and egress of files and auditing transactions, and their responses to emerging opportunities, including cloud computing and national and international data sharing. We will explore how the interplay of physical, technical and procedural controls have been combined to create existing models, and the extent to which these can balance each other and be applied with flexibility depending on perceived risk and regimes.
Session structurePrior to the session, we will develop a draft set of criteria for “Appropriate secure access” to linked health data. The session will comprise presentations describing existing secure analysis environments against the draft criteria, followed by a facilitated discussion. The secure data analysis environments that will be presented include:
UNSW Sydney E-Research Institutional Cloud Architecture (ERICA)
PopData BC Secure Research Environment (SRE)
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Data and Analytic Virtual Environment (IDAVE)
Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Gateway
Intended output or outcomeWe will write up the outcomes of the session as a scientific paper that proposes an aggregate term for secure data analysis environments for linked health data and a set of criteria for what entails “Appropriate secure access” to linked health data.
Presenters and Facilitators
Professor Louisa Jorm, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia
Dr Tim Churches, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Australia
Professor Kim McGrail, Population Data BC, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
J. Charles Victor, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
Dr Kerina Jones, Swansea University Medical School, Wales, United Kingdom
Professor David Ford, Swansea University Medical School, Wales, United Kingdom
1. Burton PR, Murtagh MJ, Boyd A, et al. Data Safe Havens in health research and healthcare. Bioinformatics 2015; 31(20): 3241–3248
Collapse
|
28
|
McGrail K, Wickham C, Hobby D, Schwartz J, Courtney D, Leshin R. Success in Schools: Meeting Professional Standards in School Meals Programs. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.06.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Jones K, McGrail K, Schnell R, Coeli C, Lee S. International Journal Population Data Science: development and future directions. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and rationaleThe International Journal of Population Data Science (IJPDS) was launched in April 2017. It is an electronic, open-access, peer reviewed journal, publishing articles on all aspects of research, development and evaluation connected with about people and populations. It represents an internationally unique vehicle for publishing a broader range of articles than most journals in related fields by including in scope: working papers, methodological developments, informative reports, and other pieces of interest, in addition to more traditional manuscripts. As such, it provides a focal point (and a home) for all areas of Population Data Science. The creation of the IJPDS was inspired by the IPDLN, and places great importance on the viewpoints and activities of Network members to guide the development of the journal.
ObjectiveInformation dissemination – stakeholder consultation – informing future directionsThe main objective of this collaborative session is to present the audience with an up-to-date summary of journal strategy and progress to date, and to use this forum to gain further viewpoints to better target future directions of the journal to meet the needs of those working in Population Data Science.
PlanThe session will comprise 5 sections:
A short presentation overviewing the journal, its historical origins, its remit and relationship to the IPDLN and Network members. Primary objectives of the journal and performance metrics from the first 18 months of operation will be presented.
Gauging audience opinion on:
What they like/dislike about the journal
What is working well/not so well
Feedback and discussion on the survey results
Discussions with audience in groups, each focusing on some/all of the following questions, and a question of their own choice if something arises:
How can we make IJPDS articles more accessible to the general reader/non-specialist researcher?Example options: short video/audio; general reader summaries; infographics; other
How can we increase the reach of, and interest in, the journal?
Open answers
What would you suggest as a special issue?These topics for group discussion will be posed to the session audience with the aim of using the feedback in defining our priorities for the coming year.
Feedback and summing up
The groups will be asked to give their feedback.
Feedback from the discussions and voting will be used to inform the next steps for IJPDS.
Facilitators
Kerina Jones, Founding Editor-in-Chief, Swansea University, Wales
Kim McGrail, Deputy Editor, University of British Columbia, Canada
Claudia Medina Coeli, Editorial Board member, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Brazil
Rainer Schnell, Editorial Board member, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Stephanie Lee, Journal Director of Operations, Swansea University, Wales
Collapse
|
30
|
Seow H, Qureshi D, Barbera L, McGrail K, Lawson B, Burge F, Sutradhar R. Benchmarking time to initiation of end-of-life homecare nursing: a population-based cancer cohort study in regions across Canada. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:70. [PMID: 29728091 PMCID: PMC5936018 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0321-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of early initiation of end-of-life care, particularly homecare nursing services. However, there is little research on variations in the timing of when end-of-life homecare nursing is initiated and no established benchmarks. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with a cancer-confirmed cause of death between 2004 and 2009, from three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Ontario). We linked multiple administrative health databases within each province to examine homecare use in the last 6 months of life. Our primary outcome was mean time (in days) to first end-of-life homecare nursing visit, starting from 6 months before death, by region. We developed an empiric benchmark for this outcome using a funnel plot, controlling for region size. Results Of the 28 regions, large variations in the outcome were observed, with the longest mean time (97 days) being two-fold longer than the shortest (55 days). On average, British Columbia and Nova Scotia had the first and second shortest mean times, respectively. The province of Ontario consistently had longer mean times. The empiric benchmark mean based on best-performing regions was 57 mean days. Conclusions Significant variation exists for the time to initiation of end-of-life homecare nursing across regions. Understanding regional variation and developing an empiric benchmark for homecare nursing can support health system planners to set achievable targets for earlier initiation of end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Danial Qureshi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Barbera
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Repka M, Lei S, Campbell L, Suy S, Voyadzis J, Kalhorn C, McGrail K, Subramaniam D, Collins S, Jean W, Collins B. EP-1209: Long-term outcomes following conventionally fractionated stereotactic boost for high-grade glioma. Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)31519-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
32
|
Seow H, Arora A, Barbera L, McGrail K, Lawson B, Burge F, Sutradhar R. Does access to end-of-life homecare nursing differ by province and community size?: A population-based cohort study of cancer decedents across Canada. Health Policy 2017; 122:134-139. [PMID: 29254648 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated the strong association between increased end-of-life homecare nursing use and reduced acute care utilization. However, little research has described the utilization patterns of end-of-life homecare nursing and how this differs by region and community size. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study of cancer decedents from Ontario, British Columbia, and Nova Scotia was conducted between 2004 and 2009. Provinces linked administrative databases which provide data about homecare nursing use for the last 6 months of life for each cancer decedent. Among weekly users of homecare nursing in their last six months of life, we describe the proportion of patients receiving end-of-life homecare nursing by province and community size. RESULTS Our cohort included 83,746 cancer decedents across 3 provinces. Patients receiving end-of-life nursing among homecare nursing users increased from weeks -26 to -1 before death by: 78% to 93% in British Columbia, 40% to 81% in Ontario, and 52% to 91% in Nova Scotia. In all 3 provinces, the smallest community size had the lowest proportion of patients using end-of-life nursing compared to the second largest community size, which had the highest proportion. CONCLUSIONS Differences in end-of-life homecare nursing use are much larger between provinces than between community sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Lisa Barbera
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Fred Burge
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pérez-Alea M, McGrail K, Sánchez-Redondo S, Ferrer B, Fournet G, Cortés J, Muñoz E, Hernandez-Losa J, Tenbaum S, Martin G, Costello R, Ceylan I, Garcia-Patos V, Recio JA. ALDH1A3 is epigenetically regulated during melanocyte transformation and is a target for melanoma treatment. Oncogene 2017; 36:5695-5708. [PMID: 28581514 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Revised: 04/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Despite the promising targeted and immune-based interventions in melanoma treatment, long-lasting responses are limited. Melanoma cells present an aberrant redox state that leads to the production of toxic aldehydes that must be converted into less reactive molecules. Targeting the detoxification machinery constitutes a novel therapeutic avenue for melanoma. Here, using 56 cell lines representing nine different tumor types, we demonstrate that melanoma cells exhibit a strong correlation between reactive oxygen species amounts and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) activity. We found that ALDH1A3 is upregulated by epigenetic mechanisms in melanoma cells compared with normal melanocytes. Furthermore, it is highly expressed in a large percentage of human nevi and melanomas during melanocyte transformation, which is consistent with the data from the TCGA, CCLE and protein atlas databases. Melanoma treatment with the novel irreversible isoform-specific ALDH1 inhibitor [4-dimethylamino-4-methyl-pent-2-ynthioic acid-S methylester] di-methyl-ampal-thio-ester (DIMATE) or depletion of ALDH1A1 and/or ALDH1A3, promoted the accumulation of apoptogenic aldehydes leading to apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition in immunocompetent, immunosuppressed and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Interestingly, DIMATE also targeted the slow cycling label-retaining tumor cell population containing the tumorigenic and chemoresistant cells. Our findings suggest that aldehyde detoxification is relevant metabolic mechanism in melanoma cells, which can be used as a novel approach for melanoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pérez-Alea
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - K McGrail
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - S Sánchez-Redondo
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - B Ferrer
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain.,Anatomy Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - G Fournet
- Institut de Chimie et Biochimie Moléculaire et Supramoléculaire, UMR-CNRS 5246, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard-Lyon1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - J Cortés
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology-VHIO, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - E Muñoz
- Clinical Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology-VHIO, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - J Hernandez-Losa
- Anatomy Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - S Tenbaum
- Stem Cells and Cancer Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Martin
- Advanced BioDesign, Parc Technologique de Lyon, Woodstock - Bâtiment Cèdre 1, Saint Priest, France
| | - R Costello
- Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Conception, Marseille, France
| | - I Ceylan
- Advanced BioDesign, Parc Technologique de Lyon, Woodstock - Bâtiment Cèdre 1, Saint Priest, France
| | - V Garcia-Patos
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain.,Dermatology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| | - J A Recio
- Biomedical Research in Melanoma-Animal Models and Cancer Laboratory-Oncology Program, Vall d'Hebron Research institute VHIR-Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona-UAB, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Langton J, Wong S, Peterson S, McGrail K. Developing population segments with different levels of complexity and primary health care needs: An analysis using health administrative data in British Columbia, Canada. Int J Popul Data Sci 2017. [PMCID: PMC8480705 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
35
|
Seow H, Pataky R, Lawson B, O'Leary EM, Sutradhar R, Fassbender K, McGrail K, Barbera L, Mpa MD, Burge F, Peacock SJ, Hoch JS. Temporal association between home nursing and hospital costs at end of life in three provinces. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 23:S42-51. [PMID: 26985145 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.2971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has demonstrated that increases in palliative homecare nursing are associated with a reduction in the rate of subsequent hospitalizations. However, little evidence is available about the cost-savings potential of palliative nursing when accounting for both increased nursing costs and potentially reduced hospital costs. METHODS Our retrospective cohort study included cancer decedents from British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia who received any palliative nursing in the last 6 months of life. A Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the association of increased nursing costs (in 2-week blocks) on the relative average hospital costs in the subsequent 2-week block and on the overall total cost (hospital costs plus nursing costs in the preceding 2-week block). RESULTS The cohort included 58,022 cancer decedents. Results of the analysis for the last month of life showed an association between increased nursing costs and decreased relative hospital costs in comparisons with a reference group (>0 to 1 hour nursing in the block): the maximum decrease was 55% for Ontario, 31% for British Columbia, and 38% for Nova Scotia. Also, increased nursing costs in the last month were almost always associated with lower total costs in comparison with the reference. For example, cost savings per person-block ranged from $376 (>10 nursing hours) to $1,124 (>4 to 6 nursing hours) in British Columbia. CONCLUSIONS In the last month of life, increased palliative nursing costs (compared with costs for >0 to 1 hour of nursing in the block) were associated with lower relative hospital costs and a lower total cost in a subsequent block. Our research suggests a cost-savings potential associated with increased community-based palliative nursing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - R Pataky
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC
| | - B Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - E M O'Leary
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - R Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON;; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - K Fassbender
- Department of Palliative Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - K McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - L Barbera
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - M D Mpa
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON;; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - F Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - S J Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC;; BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - J S Hoch
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC;; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON;; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Faculty of Pharmacy, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON;; Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Seow H, Barbera L, Pataky R, Lawson B, O'Leary E, Fassbender K, McGrail K, Burge F, Brouwers M, Sutradhar R. Does Increasing Home Care Nursing Reduce Emergency Department Visits at the End of Life? A Population-Based Cohort Study of Cancer Decedents. J Pain Symptom Manage 2016; 51:204-12. [PMID: 26514717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite being commonplace in health care systems, little research has described home care nursing's effectiveness to reduce acute care use at the end of life. OBJECTIVES To examine the temporal association between home care nursing rate on emergency department (ED) visit rate in the subsequent week during the last six months of life. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of end-of-life cancer decedents in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2009 by linking administrative databases. We examined the association between home care nursing rate of one week with the ED rate in the subsequent week closer to death, controlling for covariates and repeated measures among decedents. Nursing was dichotomized into standard and end-of-life care intent. RESULTS Our cohort included 54,576 decedents who used home care nursing services in the last six months before death, where 85% had an ED visit and 68% received end-of-life home care nursing. Patients receiving end-of-life nursing at any week had a significantly reduced ED rate in the subsequent week of 31% (relative rate [RR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68, 0.71) compared with standard nursing. In the last month of life, receiving end-of-life nursing and standard nursing rate of more than five hours/week was associated with a decreased ED rate of 41% (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.58, 0.61) and 32% (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66, 0.70), respectively, compared with standard nursing of one hour/week. CONCLUSION Our study showed a temporal association between receiving end-of-life nursing in a given week during the last six months of life, and of more standard nursing in the last month of life, with a reduced ED rate in the subsequent week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lisa Barbera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reka Pataky
- British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Erin O'Leary
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Konrad Fassbender
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Melissa Brouwers
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Seow H, Sutradhar R, McGrail K, Fassbender K, Pataky R, Lawson B, Sussman J, Burge F, Barbera L. End-of-Life Cancer Care: Temporal Association between Homecare Nursing and Hospitalizations. J Palliat Med 2015; 19:263-70. [PMID: 26673031 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most cancer patients want to die at home, but scaleable models to achieve this are not well researched. Our objective was to investigate the temporal association of homecare nursing, especially by generalist nurses, with reduced end-of-life hospitalizations. METHODS We conducted a retrospective Canadian cohort study of end-of-life cancer decedents during 2004-2009 in Ontario (ON), Nova Scotia (NS), and British Columbia (BC), which have homecare systems that use generalist nurses to provide end-of-life care. Each province linked administrative databases to examine the association during the last six months of life between the homecare nursing rate and the hospitalization rate in the subsequent week, using standardized definitions and controlling for other covariates. We dichotomized nursing into standard and end-of-life care intent. RESULTS Our cohort included 83,827 cancer decedents. Approximately 55% of decedents were older than 70 and the most common cancer was lung. Nearly 85% of the cohort had at least one hospital admission. Receiving end-of-life compared to standard homecare nursing significantly reduced a patient's hospitalization rate by 34%, 33%, and 17% in ON, BC, and NS. In the last month of life patients having a standard nursing rate of greater than five hours compared to one hour per week had a significantly lower hospitalization rate (relative reduction of 15%-23%) across the three provinces. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a protective effect of nursing with an end-of-life intent on hospitalization across the last six months of life and of standard nursing in the last month. This finding's generalizability is strengthened, since the trends were similar across three different homecare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- 1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- 2 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,3 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- 4 School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Konrad Fassbender
- 5 Department of Oncology, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Reka Pataky
- 6 Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada .,7 British Columbia Cancer Research Centre , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- 8 Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jonathan Sussman
- 1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- 8 Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lisa Barbera
- 2 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,9 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haller MJ, Atkinson MA, Wasserfall CH, Brusko TM, Mathews CE, Hulme M, Cintron M, Shuster J, McGrail K, Posgai A, Schatz D. Mobilization without immune depletion fails to restore immunological tolerance or preserve beta cell function in recent onset type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 2015; 183:350-7. [PMID: 26462724 DOI: 10.1111/cei.12731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used to restore immune competence following chemoablative cancer therapy and to promote immunological tolerance in certain settings of autoimmunity. Therefore, we tested the potential of G-CSF to impact type 1 diabetes (T1D) progression in patients with recent-onset disease [n = 14; n = 7 (placebo)] and assessed safety, efficacy and mechanistic effects on the immune system. We hypothesized that pegylated G-CSF (6 mg administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 12 weeks) would promote regulatory T cell (Treg) mobilization to a degree capable of restoring immunological tolerance, thus preventing further decline in C-peptide production. Although treatment was well tolerated, G-CSF monotherapy did not affect C-peptide production, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) or insulin dose. Mechanistically, G-CSF treatment increased circulating neutrophils during the 12-week course of therapy (P < 0·01) but did not alter Treg frequencies. No effects were observed for CD4(+) : CD8(+) T cell ratio or the ratio of naive : memory (CD45RA(+)/CD45RO(+)) CD4(+) T cells. As expected, manageable bone pain was common in subjects receiving G-CSF, but notably, no severe adverse events such as splenomegaly occurred. This study supports the continued exploration of G-CSF and other mobilizing agents in subjects with T1D, but only when combined with immunodepleting agents where synergistic mechanisms of action have previously demonstrated efficacy towards the preservation of C-peptide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Haller
- Departments of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - M A Atkinson
- Departments of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - C H Wasserfall
- Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - T M Brusko
- Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - C E Mathews
- Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - M Hulme
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - M Cintron
- Departments of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - J Shuster
- Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - K McGrail
- Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - A Posgai
- Immunology, Pathology, and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - D Schatz
- Departments of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barbera L, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Chu A, Burge F, Fassbender K, McGrail K, Lawson B, Liu Y, Pataky R, Potapov A. Quality of end-of-life cancer care in Canada: a retrospective four-province study using administrative health care data. Curr Oncol 2015; 22:341-55. [PMID: 26628867 PMCID: PMC4608400 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of data comparing care at the end of life (eol) in cancer patients across Canada is poor. This project used identical cohorts and definitions to evaluate quality indicators for eol care in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. METHODS This retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents during fiscal years 2004-2009 used administrative health care data to examine health service quality indicators commonly used and previously identified as important to quality eol care: emergency department use, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, chemotherapy, physician house calls, and home care visits near the eol, as well as death in hospital. Crude and standardized rates were calculated. In each province, two separate multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with receiving aggressive or supportive care. RESULTS Overall, among the identified 200,285 cancer patients who died of their disease, 54% died in a hospital, with British Columbia having the lowest standardized rate of such deaths (50.2%). Emergency department use at eol ranged from 30.7% in Nova Scotia to 47.9% in Ontario. Of all patients, 8.7% received aggressive care (similar across all provinces), and 46.3% received supportive care (range: 41.2% in Nova Scotia to 61.8% in British Columbia). Lower neighbourhood income was consistently associated with a decreased likelihood of supportive care receipt. INTERPRETATION We successfully used administrative health care data from four Canadian provinces to create identical cohorts with commonly defined indicators. This work is an important step toward maturing the field of eol care in Canada. Future work in this arena would be facilitated by national-level data-sharing arrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Barbera
- Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - H. Seow
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - R. Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - A. Chu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - F. Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - K. Fassbender
- Department of Oncology, Division of Palliative Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| | - K. McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - B. Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - Y. Liu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON
| | - R. Pataky
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC
| | - A. Potapov
- Department of Oncology, Division of Palliative Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Barbera L, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Chu A, Burge F, Fassbender K, McGrail K, Lawson B, Liu Y, Pataky R, Potapov A. Quality Indicators of End-of-Life Care in Patients With Cancer: What Rate Is Right? J Oncol Pract 2015; 11:e279-87. [PMID: 25922219 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.004416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop data-driven and achievable benchmark rates for end-of-life quality indicators using administrative data from four provinces in Canada. METHODS Indicators of end-of-life care were defined and measured using linked administrative data for 33 health regions across British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. These were emergency department use, intensive care unit admission, physician house calls and home care visits before death, and death in hospital. An empiric benchmark was defined using indicator rates from the top-ranked regions to include the top decile of patients overall. Funnel plots were used to graph each region's age- and sex-adjusted indicator rates along with the overall rate and 95% confidence limits. RESULTS Rates varied approximately two- to four-fold across the regions, with physician house calls showing the greatest variation. Benchmark rates based on the top decile performers were emergency department use, 34%; intensive care unit admission, 2%; physician house calls, 34%; home care visits, 63%; and death in hospital, 38%. With the exception of intensive care unit admission, funnel plots demonstrated that overall indicator rates and their confidence limits were uniformly worse than benchmarks even after adjusting for age and sex. Few regions met the benchmark rates. CONCLUSION There is significant variation in end-of-life quality indicators across regions in four provinces in Canada. Using this study's methods-deriving empiric benchmarks and funnel plots-regions can determine their relative performance with greater context that facilitates priority setting and resource deployment. Applying this study's methods can support quality improvement by decreasing variation and striving for a target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Barbera
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Konrad Fassbender
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ying Liu
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Reka Pataky
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alex Potapov
- Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia; and Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bryan S, Davis J, Broesch J, Doyle-Waters M, Lewis S, McGrail K, McGregor M, Murphy J, Sawatzky R. Choosing Your Partner for the PROM: A Review of Evidence on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Primary and Community Care. Healthc Policy 2014. [DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2015.24035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
42
|
Bryan S, Davis J, Broesch J, Doyle-Waters MM, Lewis S, McGrail K, McGregor MJ, Murphy JM, Sawatzky R. Choosing your partner for the PROM: a review of evidence on patient-reported outcome measures for use in primary and community care. Healthc Policy 2014; 10:38-51. [PMID: 25617514 PMCID: PMC4748356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are assessments of health status from the patient's perspective. The systematic and routine collection and use of PROMs in healthcare settings adds value in several ways, including quality improvement and service evaluation. We address the issue of instrument selection for use in primary and/or community settings. Specifically, from the large number of available PROMs, which instrument delivers the highest level of performance and validity? For selected generic PROMs, we reviewed literature on psychometric properties and other instrument features (e.g., health domains captured). Briefly we summarize key strengths of the three PROMs that received the most favourable psycho-metric and overall evaluation. The Short-Form 36 has a number of strengths, chiefly, its strong psychometric properties such as responsiveness. The PROMIS/Global Health Scale scored highly on most criteria and warrants serious consideration, especially as it is free to use. The EQ-5D scored satisfactorily on many criteria and, beneficially, it has a low response burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stirling Bryan
- Director, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Professor, School of Population & Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jennifer Davis
- Post-Doctoral Fellow, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC
| | - James Broesch
- Post-Doctoral Fellow, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mary M Doyle-Waters
- Librarian, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC
| | - Steven Lewis
- President, Access Consulting Ltd, Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Saskatoon, SK
| | - Kim McGrail
- Assistant Professor, School of Population & Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Associate Director, Centre for Health Service & Policy Research, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Margaret J McGregor
- Associate, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Associate, Centre for Health Service & Policy Research, The University of British Columbia
| | - Janice M Murphy
- Research Consultant, Balfour, BC; and Rick Sawatzky, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Scientist, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Healthcare, Langley, BC
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Barbera LC, Sutradhar R, Burge F, McGrail K, Fassbender K, Lawson B, Pataky R, Potapov A, Peacock S, Chu A, Liu Y, Seow H. Quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care: What rate is right? J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.30_suppl.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
57 Background: Many publications use administrative health care data to describe quality of care indicators at the end of life (EOL). However, very little is available to help decide on optimal rates for these indicators. The purpose of this abstract is to develop data-driven and achievable benchmark rates for EOL quality indicators using administrative data from 4 provinces in Canada. Methods: Five quality indicators of EOL care were defined and measured using linked administrative data for each of the 33 regions across British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Nova Scotia. These were: emergency department (ED) use, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, physician house calls (MD) and nursing visits at home (RN) prior to death, and death in hospital (DH). First, an empiric benchmark was defined by determining indicator rates among the top ranked regions to include the top decile of patients overall. Second, funnel plots were used to graph the age and sex adjusted indicator rates for each region along with the overall average value and 95% confidence limits (CL) that accounted for region size. Results: There was significant variation in rates for each indicator among the regions. Minimum and maximum rates for ED, ICU, RN, MD and DH varied approximately 2 to 4 fold across the regions with MD showing the greatest variation. Benchmark rates based on the top decile performers were: ED 34%, ICU 2%, MD 34%, RN 63%, DH 38%. With the exception of ICU, funnel plots demonstrated that mean indicator rates and their 95% CL were uniformly worse than these benchmarks even after adjusting for age and sex. Additionally, few regions met the benchmark rates. Conclusions: There is significant variation in EOL quality indicators across regions in 4 provinces in Canada. The combination of these two methods allows each region to determine its performance relative to both a benchmark and the overall average. As a result, each region is then able to gauge their performance with greater context which facilitates priority setting and resource deployment. These two methods demonstrate how decreasing variation and striving for a target can drive quality improvement. Deriving benchmark values from ‘real world’ data offers the advantage of realistically achievable targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Reka Pataky
- BC Cancer Agency Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Anna Chu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ying Liu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bhandari R, Oermann E, Gurka M, Suy S, Kalhorn C, McGrail K, Collins B, Jean W, Collins S. Five Fraction Image-guided Radiosurgery for Benign Meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
45
|
McGrail K, Law M. Response to Dr. Majumdar. CMAJ 2010; 182:806. [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110-2065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
46
|
Hertzman C, McGrail K, Hirtle B. Overall pattern of health care and social welfare use by injured workers in the British Columbia cohort. Int J Law Psychiatry 1999; 22:581-601. [PMID: 10637759 DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2527(99)00027-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Hertzman
- Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Meddings DR, Hertzman C, Barer ML, Evans RG, Kazanjian A, McGrail K, Sheps SB. Socioeconomic status, mortality, and the development of cataract at a young age. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46:1451-7. [PMID: 9665575 DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)10138-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that senile cataract may serve as a marker for generalised tissue aging, since structural changes occurring in the proteins of the lens during cataract formation are similar to those which occur elsewhere as part of the aging process. An earlier analysis we carried out to test this hypothesis revealed a strong age-dependent relationship between undergoing cataract surgery and subsequent mortality. Relative risks for dying over 9 yr of follow-up were particularly increased for individuals who had developed cataract requiring operation between the ages of 50-65. This finding prompted us to test the hypothesis that younger patients undergoing surgery for cataract (those in which surgery was undertaken at 50-65 yr of age) would tend disproportionately to be resident in areas of generally lower socioeconomic status. A population-based linked health data resource containing data on all hospital separations in the province of British Columbia was used to examine this hypothesis. Linkage to Canadian census data was used to assign a socioeconomic decile to the area of residence for all individuals in British Columbia who either did, or did not, undergo cataract surgery over a 3 yr period, and were aged 50-95. Relative to those who resided in the highest socioeconomic areas, odds ratios for undergoing cataract surgery between 50 and 65 yr of age were significantly greater than 1 for the four lowest socioeconomic deciles. This association was observed despite a conservative bias in our setting that favoured those of higher socioeconomic status tending to receive earlier treatment. The results of this ecologic study prompt consideration of whether factors which have the dual attributes of being correlates of socioeconomic status and implicated in the development of cataract may play a role in mediating the processes involved in the well known association of socioeconomic status and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R Meddings
- Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Reduction cranioplasty can greatly improve the quality of life for selected patients with severe macrocephaly and can significantly diminish some of the difficulties in the long-term chronic care of others. Because of differences in age, cranial morphology and surgical goals, the surgical plan must be tailored to the individual patient. Three techniques for reduction cranioplasty, with the advantages and disadvantages of each, are described. Four patients, representing the spectrum of severe macrocephaly and also the problems associated with reduction cranioplasty, are presented. Surgical indications, tactical considerations and risks are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R Winston
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ogilvy CS, Chapman PH, McGrail K. Subdural empyema complicating bacterial meningitis in a child: Enhancement of membranes with gadolinium on magnetic resonance imaging in a patient without enhancement on computed tomography. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1992; 37:138-41. [PMID: 1347665 DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(92)90190-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Subdural empyema is a known yet infrequent complication of bacterial meningitis. Subdural effusions occur frequently with meningitis in children and usually resolve spontaneously or with subdural taps. Subdural empyema should be suspected when a patient fails to respond to antibiotic therapy or worsens neurologically. Computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast often show enhancement of subdural collections when an empyema exists. However, this is not true all of the time. We present a case of subdural empyema complicating bacterial meningitis in a 4 month old in which CT enhancement was not present yet magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with gadolinium demonstrated intense enhancement. For comparison, we present a second case of a child with sterile subdural effusions due to meningitis that demonstrates an absence of contrast enhancement on MRI studies. MRI scans with contrast may offer a more sensitive means of making an early diagnosis of subdural empyema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Ogilvy
- Neurosurgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114
| | | | | |
Collapse
|