Socioeconomic inequalities and Black/White disparities in US cocaine-involved overdose mortality risk

Multilevel Factors Impacting Substance Use Treatment Access, Engagement, and Racial Equity Among Opioid Overdose Survivors in Boston, MA

BACKGROUND

There are well-documented racial/ethnic inequities in drug-related overdoses and access to evidence-based opioid use services nationally and in Boston, MA.

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively explore the drivers of racial/ethnic inequities in access to opioid use disorder treatment and services in Boston.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Using purposive sampling, researchers recruited 59 opioid overdose survivors in Boston who self-identified as Black, Hispanic or Latino/a/x, and/or White.

APPROACH

Interviewers administered a socio-demographic and drug use survey, and used a semi-structured interview guide to explore experiences with and perspectives on substance use treatment and services.

KEY RESULTS

Participants' racial/ethnic identities were distributed across three subgroups: non-Hispanic Black (n = 18; 31%), non-Hispanic White (n = 18; 31%), and Latino/a/x (n = 23; 39%). Qualitative analysis identified multiple themes that were organized into four social-ecological levels after analysis. At the individual level, some participants emphasized the importance of personal responsibility and individual motivation in determining access to services. Participants expressed a range of perspectives about using medication for opioid use disorder treatment; Black and Latino/a/x participants were more likely than White participants to have critical perspectives. At the interpersonal level, experiences of bias, stigma, and racism from staff in healthcare and treatment settings were common. At the program/process level, participants described challenges connecting to services following overdose and barriers within specific programs, with Black and Latino/a/x participants experiencing particular gaps. At the systems level, the limited availability of housing, employment, and mental health care negatively impacted treatment access and engagement.

CONCLUSION

A racism lens was used during data interpretation to apply the themes at a broader population level. Through this lens, the identified barriers can be understood to have a disproportionate impact on people of color. Findings call for programmatic and policy solutions that address racism, break down stigma, and ensure equitable access to evidence-based services and social supports.

Worsening trends in the frequency of methamphetamine and other stimulant use between treatment admission and discharge

BACKGROUND

Treatment for methamphetamine and other stimulants can be effective but treatment attrition and continued use are very high. Abstinence is the conventional outcome used to evaluate treatment success, but defining treatment success in this way misses opportunities to promote improved health even when abstinence is not achieved. Reducing methamphetamine and stimulant use without abstinence is associated with many positive outcomes. However, little is known about drug use patterns during treatment or trends in use over time.

METHODS

We used the Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharges (TEDS-D) to identify treatment episodes that had a stimulant drug indicated as the primary substance of use (2017-2021; N=251,841; methamphetamine, cocaine, other amphetamines, or other stimulants). Our outcome was the change in the frequency of drug use between admission and discharge (decreased use with abstinence, decreased use without abstinence, increased use). We used multiple logistic regression to model a change in drug use frequency, predicted by year, stimulant type, and their interaction.

RESULTS

Nearly two-thirds of the sample (60 %) had methamphetamine indicated as the primary stimulant of use. There was a decrease in the predicted rate of abstinence over time and worsening trends were strongest among those using methamphetamine. Daily and periodic drug use at both admission and discharge (no change in use) became worse over time, particularly for those using methamphetamine.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcomes worsened over time and declined fastest among those reporting methamphetamine. Abstinence was rare and most treatment clients did not change their drug use behavior. We recommend a renewed focus on evidence-based harm reduction while the nation's treatment systems continue grappling with the stimulant crises.

Naloxone Administration and Survival in Overdoses Involving Opioids and Stimulants: An Analysis of Law Enforcement Data from 63 Pennsylvania Counties

Background

In consideration of rising deaths from opioid-stimulant-involved overdoses in the United States, this study explored rates of naloxone administration and survival in opioid overdoses with versus without stimulants co-involved.

Methods

The study used data from the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, focusing on 26,635 suspected opioid-involved overdose events recorded by law enforcement and other first responders in 63 Pennsylvania counties from January 2018 to July 2024. Relative frequencies and chi-square tests were first used to compare suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants (cocaine or methamphetamine) co-involved. Next, mediation analyses tested naloxone administration as a mediator of the association between stimulant co-involvement (in opioid overdoses) and survival.

Results

Naloxone was reportedly administered in 72.2% of the opioid-no-cocaine overdoses, compared to 55.1% of the opioid-cocaine-involved overdoses, and 72.1% of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses vs. 52.4% of the opioid-methamphetamine-involved overdoses. With respect to survival rates, 18.0% of the opioid-no-cocaine overdoses ended in death, compared to 41.3% of the opioid-cocaine overdoses; 18.1% of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses ended in death, versus 42.9% of the opioid-methamphetamine overdoses. In mediation analyses (adjusted for demographics, county, year, and other drug co-involvement), naloxone administration mediated 38.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 31.3%-46.0%) of the association between cocaine co-involvement and survival and 39.2% (95% CI, 31.3%-47.1%) of the association between methamphetamine co-involvement and survival.

Conclusions

Among suspected opioid overdose events recorded in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, stimulant co-involvement was associated with lower naloxone administration and higher fatality, with naloxone partially mediating the association between stimulant co-involvement and death.

Understanding and Addressing Widening Racial Inequalities in Drug Overdose

The fourth wave of the United States overdose crisis-driven by the polysubstance use of fentanyl with stimulants and other synthetic substances-has driven sharply escalating racial/ethnic inequalities in drug overdose death rates. Here the authors present a detailed portrait of the latest overdose trends and synthesize the literature to describe where, how, and why these inequalities are worsening. By 2022 overdose deaths among Native and Black Americans rose to 1.8 and 1.4 times the rate seen among White Americans, respectively. This reflects that Black and Native Americans have been disproportionately affected by fentanyl and the combination of fentanyl and stimulants at the national level and in virtually every state. The highest overdose deaths rates are currently seen among Black Americans 55-64 years of age as well as younger cohorts of Native Americans 25-44 years of age. In 2022-the latest year of data available-deaths among White Americans decreased relative to 2021, whereas rates among all other groups assessed continued to rise. Moving forward, Fundamental Cause Theory shows us a relevant universal truth of implementation science: in socially unequal societies, new technologies typically end up favoring more privileged groups first, thereby widening inequalities unless underlying social inequalities are addressed. Therefore, interventions designed to reduce addiction and overdose death rates that are not explicitly designed to also improve racial/ethnic inequalities will often unintentionally end up worsening them. Well-funded community-based programs, with Black and Native leadership, providing harm reduction resources, naloxone, and medications for opioid use disorder in the context of comprehensive, culturally appropriate healthcare and other services, represent the highest priority interventions to decrease inequalities.

Racial, Ethnic, and Regional Disparities in Cocaine-Involved Overdose Deaths in the US, 1999-2020

BACKGROUND

Social inequalities among underrepresented communities may lead to higher overdose mortality involving cocaine use. We assessed the temporal trends in cocaine-involved overdose mortality rate in the US by race, ethnicity, and geographic region from 1999 to 2020.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study among adults in the US using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (1999 to 2020). To identify cocaine-involved overdose decedents, we used the International Classification of Diseases Code, 10th Revision-T40.5. We used Joinpoint regression to examine the trends in age-adjusted cocaine-involved overdose mortality rates (AAMR) by race, ethnicity, and geographic region and estimated annual percentage changes (APC).

RESULTS

Overall, cocaine-involved overdose mortality trends increased (APC, 11.3%; 95% CI, 0.6, 23.2) from 2017 to 2020. The latest trends have remained stable among Non-Hispanic Whites since 2017 (APC, 4.3%; 95% CI, -5.7%, 15.4%) but have significantly increased among Non-Hispanic Blacks (APC, 27.2%; 95% CI, 22.1%, 32.5%), Hispanics (APC, 26.9%; 95% CI, 20.6%, 33.5%), and American Indians/Alaska Natives (APC, 24.1%; 95% CI, 16.5%, 32.2%).

CONCLUSION

Cocaine-related overdose deaths in the US significantly increased between 2017 and 2020, but the increase was among racial and ethnic minorities and not among Non-Hispanic Whites. These findings suggest a need to address the US' longstanding racial and ethnic healthcare inequities.

Substance Use Treatment Utilization Among Individuals With Substance Use Disorders in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings on the Role of Polysubstance Use, Criminal Justice Involvement, and Mental Illness From the National Survey on Drug Use and Health

This study used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health to assess a nationally representative sample (N = 4596) weighted to represent 35.2 million adults with DSM-5 criteria-determined substance use disorders (SUDs). This study explored substance use treatment utilization in 2020, emphasizing populations with high vulnerability (e.g., criminal justice involvement (CJI) through parole or probation, polysubstance use, severe mental illness, and HIV/STI). Substance use treatment was broadly defined (any inpatient, outpatient/doctor's office, self-help/other for alcohol/drugs). Our results indicated that among adults with SUDs in 2020, 7 million (20%) had multiple SUDs, 1.75 million (5%) had CJI, 5.3 million (15%) had a severe mental illness, and 1.8 million (5%) had a diagnosis of HIV/STI in the last year. Only 7% of individuals with SUD sought any substance use treatment in the past year. CJI (aOR: 13.39, 95% CI: [7.82, 22.94]), serious mental illness (aOR: 3.27, 95% CI: [1.93, 5.55]), and having both 2 (aOR: 2.10, 95% CI: [1.29, 3.42]) or 3 or more SUDs (aOR: 3.46, 95% CI: [1.82, 6.58]) were all associated with a greater likelihood of receiving treatment. Marriage (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: [0.25, 0.74]) and having an income twice the poverty threshold (aOR: 0.53, 95% CI: [0.29, 0.94]) were associated with reduced odds of receiving any substance use treatment. Compared to those 18 to 25, older individuals had increased odds (2-4 times) of receiving treatment. Interventions are crucially needed to increase access to treatment among those with SUDs.

Race-Related and Mental Health Factors of Powder Cocaine Use Among Black Incarcerated Men

Incarceration disproportionately impacts Black men in the United States, which can have compounding effects on mental health and substance use among this population. Cocaine use, in particular, carries higher severity of dependence and overdose risks among Black Americans, though research examining cocaine use correlates among Black incarcerated men is limited. The present study examines race-related and mental health correlates of powder cocaine use among a sample of incarcerated Black men (n = 208) using the General Strain Theory. Specifically, the present study was a secondary analysis examining race-related stress, psychological distress (i.e., anxiety and depression), and stigma about receiving psychological help as correlates of lifetime powder cocaine use. Results indicated that the likelihood of lifetime powder cocaine use was higher among those reporting lifetime psychological distress and greater race-related stress. Stigma about receiving psychological help was not significantly associated with lifetime powder cocaine use among this sample. Results of this study have important implications for substance use treatment interventions. Identifying adaptive coping strategies to manage anxiety and depression symptoms and race-related stress among incarcerated Black men may help reduce rates of cocaine use among this population and increase successful reintegration into the community post-incarceration.