Implantatallergieregister – ein erster Erfahrungsbericht

Understanding immune-mediated cobalt/chromium allergy to orthopaedic implants: a meta-synthetic review

BACKGROUND

The frequency of primary joint replacement surgery continues to increase worldwide. While largely considered biologically inert entities, an increasing body of evidence continues to validate a not insignificant incidence of allergic reactions to such implants. Little previous work has explored genuinely immune-mediated reactivity in this context. In the absence of a contemporary published summary on the topic, this paper explored the current state of understanding of cobalt/chromium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically suggested.

METHODS

A structured, systematic literature review was performed by following PRISMA search principles to provide an updated review of this area.

RESULTS

Thirty-six topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting lower tiers of scientific evidence with a lack of homogeneous quantitative data to facilitate valid cohort comparisons. Largely, the available literature represented small case series' or expert opinions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing clinical awareness and acknowledgement of true allergy to joint replacement components, this review highlighted that the evidence base underpinning the diagnosis and management of such patients is limited. Both patient-reported metal allergy or skin patch testing are grossly unreliable methods and show almost no correlation with true immune reactivity. Recent studies suggested a potential role for patient-specific in vitro cellular activation testing and/or targeted genetic testing when cobalt/chromium allergy is clinically suspected. However, while likely representing the contemporary "best available" approaches both can be costly undertakings, are not yet universally available, and still require broader validation in non-research settings before wider uptake can be championed.

Allergic reaction and metal hypersensitivity after shoulder joint replacement

PURPOSE

Metal ion release may cause local and systemic effects and induce hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of our study is first to determine if implant-related hypersensitivity correlates to patient symptoms or not; second, to assess the rate of hypersensitivity and allergies in shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Forty patients with shoulder replacements performed between 2015 and 2017 were studied with minimum 2-year follow-up; no patient had prior metal implants. Each patient underwent radiographic and clinical evaluation using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), 22 metal and cement haptens patch testing, serum and urine tests to evaluate 12 metals concentration, and a personal occupational medicine interview.

RESULTS

At follow-up (average 45 ± 10.7 months), the mean CMS was 76 ± 15.9; no clinical complications or radiographic signs of loosening were detected; two nickel sulfate (5%), 1 benzoyl peroxide (2.5%) and 1 potassium dichromate (2.5%) positive findings were found, but all these patients were asymptomatic. There was an increase in serum aluminum, urinary aluminum and urinary chromium levels of 1.74, 3.40 and 1.83 times the baseline, respectively. No significant difference in metal ion concentrations were found when patients were stratified according to gender, date of surgery, type of surgery, and type of implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder arthroplasty is a source of metal ion release and might act as a sensitizing exposure. However, patch test positivity does not seem to correlate to hypersensitivity cutaneous manifestations or poor clinical results. Laboratory data showed small constant ion release over time, regardless of gender, type of shoulder replacement and implant used.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Preliminary Study on Immediate Postoperative CT Images and Values of the Modular Polyetheretherketone Based Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Observational First-in-Human Trial

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is now frequently performed and is highly successful. However, patient satisfaction after TKA is often difficult to achieve. Because of the presence of metallic prosthetic knee joints, there is a lack of imaging tools that can accurately assess the patient's postoperative prosthetic position, soft tissue impingement, and periprosthetic bone density after TKA. We conducted a clinical trial of the world's first totally modular polyetheretherketone (PEEK) TKA and determined the bone density values in the stress concentration area around the prosthesis based on postoperative computed tomography data to reconstruct a three-dimensional model of the PEEK prosthetic knee joint after implantation. Based on the model, the overhang of the prosthesis was measured at various locations on the prosthesis.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PEEK-based TKA were postoperatively assessed with radiography and computed tomography (CT). Hounsfield units (HUs) for the different components of the quantitative CT assessment were measured separately.

RESULTS

Ten patients (nine female and one male) aged 59-74 (mean 66.9, median 67) years were included. The HU values were as follows: PEEK prosthesis mean 182.95, standard deviation (SD) 4.90, coefficient of variation (CV) 2.68; polyethylene mean -89.41, SD 4.14, CV -4.63; lateral femoral osteochondral mean 192.19, SD 55.05, CV 28.64; lateral tibial osteochondral mean 122.94, SD 62.14, CV 42.86; medial femoral osteophyte mean 180.76, SD 43.48, CV 24.05; and medial tibial osteophyte mean 282.59, SD 69.28, CV 24.52. Analysis of the data at 1, 3, and 6 months showed that the mean PE (p = 0.598) and PEEK (p = 0.916) measurements did not change with the time of measurement. There was a decrease in bone mineral density in the lateral tibia at 3 months (p = 0.044). Otherwise, there was no significant change in bone density in other regions (p = 0.124-0.803). There was no overhang in all femoral prostheses, whereas there were two cases of overhang in tibial prostheses. Overhang measurements do not differ significantly across time points. The overhang measurements were not significantly different at all time points (p = 0.186-0.967).

CONCLUSION

PEEK knee joint prosthesis has excellent CT compatibility. The change in periprosthetic bone volume during the follow-up period can be determined using the HU value after CT scan, while the prosthesis position can be assessed. This assessment may potentially guide future improvements in knee prosthesis alignment techniques and artificial knee prosthesis designs.

Prospective Mid-Term Results of a Completely Metal-Free Ceramic Total Knee Endoprosthesis: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions are suspected to cause premature aseptic loosening in susceptible patients after total knee arthroplasty. In response, metal-free implants have been developed. The aim of this prospective, observational midterm study was the assessment of a completely metal-free ceramic knee replacement system as a concise follow-up of a previous report.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients, with anamnestic suspected or documented allergy to the metal used in prosthetic alloys, participated in this 4-year follow-up of the metal-free BPK-S (Peter Brehm) total knee replacement system with ceramic femoral and tibial components. Clinical assessment included Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score, Euro Quol-5D-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-VAS), and perioperative or postoperative complications and need for revision. The position of the implant, signs of loosening, and leg alignment were assessed radiographically.

RESULTS

All postoperative clinical scores improved significantly from baseline to 48-month follow-up examination. The Oxford Knee Score improved from 39 to 15 points. The KSS improved from 99 to 195 points (the KSS knee score 42.5 to 96 and the KSS function score 60 to 100). The EQ-5D improved from 12 to 7 points; the EQ-VAS improved from 52.5 to 97 points. No allergic reactions could be detected. Radiologically, a median preoperative varus deformity of 5° improved to 0° at 4-year follow-up. Radiolucent lines appeared around uncemented areas with no clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The fully metal-free BPK-S Integration ceramic knee replacement system exhibits excellent immuno-allergological compatibility, offering a safe option for patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions to metallic materials. Full cementation of all components is recommended to avoid radiolucent lines around the implant.

Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

DIAGNOSES

We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment.

OUTCOMES

The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion.

LESSONS

No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.

Implant allergy

Osteosynthesis materials or artificial joint replacement make part of clinical routine. In case of complaints mostly mechanical causes or infections are found. Metals like nickel, chromium and cobalt or bone cement components like acrylates and gentamicine may however potentially cause intolerance reactions to implants. Correspondingly, eczema, delayed wound/bone healing, recurrent effusion, pain or implant loosening have been described as manifestation of implant allergy. In contrast to the high incidence of cutaneous metal allergy, allergies associated with implants are rare. Diagnosis of metal implant allergy is based on excluding differential diagnoses – in particular infection – and on a combined approach of allergological diagnostics by patch test and histopathology of periimplant tissue. Risk factors for allergic sensitization to implants or triggering periimplant allergic reactions in the case of preexisting cutaneous metal allergy are unknown. Despite the risk of developing complications being unclear, titanium-based osteosynthesis materials are recommended for metal-allergic patients and the use of metal-metal couplings in arthroplasty is rather not recommended for such patients. If a regular, potentially applicable CoCr-polyethylene articulation is preferred, the patient has to be well informed and has to give his written consent.

First clinical study of a novel complete metal-free ceramic total knee replacement system

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel metal-free ceramic total knee replacement system.

Methods

Thirty-eight primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were performed on 34 patients using the metal-free BPK-S ceramic total knee replacement system with both the femoral and tibial components of an alumina/zirconia ceramic composite. The clinical outcome was evaluated pre- and postoperatively at 3 (n = 32 TKA) and 12 months (n = 32 TKA) using the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Oxford Knee Score and the EQ-5D. Safety analysis was performed by radiological examination and assessment of adverse events.

Results

Postoperatively, the KSS, Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D improved significantly at 3 and 12 months (p < 0.001). Non-progressive partial radiolucent lines were observed in six cases, but there was no osteolysis and no implant loosening. Induction or exacerbation of allergies did not occur during the follow-up.

Conclusions

The metal-free BPK-S ceramic total knee replacement system proved to be a safe and clinically efficient alternative to metal implants in this short-term follow-up study.

Allergic reactions in arthroplasty: myth or serious problem?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component in patients who received endoprosthetic surgery at our institution. Also, we aimed to assess the portion related to allergic reactions in endoprosthetic revisions and to follow-up those patients after allergic reaction related revisions.

METHODS

We selected patients with a pre-operative known sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component for a post-operative allergic reaction. All patients who received revision surgery because of a potential allergic reaction were followed up post revision surgery.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifty-five patients were pre-operative known to have a sensitisation to chromium, cobalt, nickel, or a cement component. Six hundred eighty-two patients (79.8 %) received a primary arthroplasty, and 173 patients (20.2 %) received a revision surgery. Seventeen patients (2.0 %) were revised because of allergic reactions. Allergic reactions were the cause for approximately 0.2 % of all endoprosthetic revisions and for 9.8 % of revisions in patients with sensitisation to one of the reviewed components. Potential allergens were strictly avoided in the replaced prosthesis. Outcome scores improved post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The allergic patient should be thoroughly informed about potential reactions resulting from implant choice. Our study can serve as risk assessments by quantifying the incidence of allergic reactions due to endoprosthetic treatment.

Prospective multi-centre study on a composite ceramic femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: Five-year clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Enhanced wear resistance of ceramics in general and improved mechanical characteristics of composite ceramics in terms of strength and resistance meet the demands for application in TKA. The aim of this prospective international multi-centre study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes of an unconstrained TKA with a composite ceramic femoral component.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients (109 knees) underwent TKA with the MULTIGEN-PLUS Ceramic Knee at seven centres in three European countries. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months, using HSS, WOMAC, SF-36 and standardised radiographs.

RESULTS

Mean HSS and WOMAC increased significantly from 55.1±11.5 (21-83) and 48.1±16.6 (3-90) preoperatively to 85.6±9.6 (49-98) and 73.3±20.4 (17-100) at 60 months. Mean SF-36 showed significant improvements in patients' quality of life (49.1±17.6 (12-96) preoperatively versus 67.7±23.1 (12-100) at 60 months). Non-progressive radiolucent lines (<1 mm) were observed around the femoral component in four cases. Neither implant migration nor loosening were registered. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 96.0% at 60 months (92.1-100%, CI 95%).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year implant survival rate of the ceramic knee is comparable to other metallic and ceramic unconstrained TKA systems. Although the assessment of long-term implant survivorship is still pending, the ceramic implants represent a promising solution for patients with allergies against metallic components and furthermore for the general osteoarthritis population due to enhanced wear resistance.

Clinical and diagnostic challenges of metal implant allergy using the example of orthopaedic surgical implants: Part 15 of the Series Molecular Allergology

The focus of this review are allergic reactions to orthopaedic-surgical metal implants. The spectrum of metal implant associated potential allergic reactions encompasses eczema, impaired wound and fracture healing, infection-mimicking reactions, effusions, pain and loosening. Nickel, cobalt and chromium seem to be the predominant eliciting allergens. Despite the growing number of respective publications the topic „metal implant allergy“ remains a diagnostic challenge. Initially, differential diagnoses should always be excluded in cooperation with surgery collegues. It is recommended to perform a combined evaluation of medical history, clinical findings, patch testing and histology. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) can indicate metal sensitization, but it needs careful interpretation. Allergists can provide a substantial contribution to this interdisciplinary topic.

[Use of allergy implants in Germany: results of a survey]

In a representative survey among members of the working group for joint replacement (AE) in Germany (86.7% response) it was found that 0.6% of patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 1.2% of patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) may have a problem due to hypersensitivity to nickel or cobalt after implantation. Only one third of them may need revision surgery. Although patients with hypersensitivity are rare 84% of surgeons would prefer to use a specially coated allergy implant for knee arthroplasty patients. However, no long term results and few data on the topic of allergies and joint arthroplasty are available for these implants so that this has to be critically discussed with patients. Before a revision is performed it is recommended to perform knee arthroscopy to obtain tissue for microbiological and histopathological investigations. The second part of this questionnaire will look at the special question of how to deal with allergy patients based on constructed case examples.

Metal hypersensitivity and metal ion levels in patients with coated or uncoated total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study

PURPOSE

Metal ion release by orthopaedic implants may cause local and systemic effects and induce hypersensitivity reactions. Coated implants have been developed to prevent or reduce these effects. This study was initiated to investigate the safety of a novel coating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients undergoing primary TKA with no history of hypersensitivity and no other metal implant were randomised to receive either a coated or uncoated implant. Chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), molybdenum (Mb) and nickel (Ni) hypersensitivity patch testing and plasma ion concentrations were evaluated pre-operatively and one year post-operatively.

RESULTS

At the one year follow-up both groups demonstrated significant improvement in knee function and quality of life. One new weakly positive reaction to Co in the TKA group with coated implant and two doubtful skin reactions to Ni (one in each group) were noted. Even with sensitisation to implant materials no skin reactions were observed. Plasma metal ion concentrations did not increase and were not elevated at the one year follow-up in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitisation after TKA was rare and had no influence on clinical results. TKA with coated implant and standard TKA demonstrated no plasma metal ion elevation.

Third-body abrasive wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components in a knee simulator study

AIM

Total knee arthroplasties have reached a high grade of quality and safety, but most often fail because of aseptic implant loosening caused by polyethylene wear debris. Wear is generated at the articulating surfaces, e.g. caused by third-body particles. The objective of this experimental study was to determine the wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components under third-body wear conditions initiated by bone cement particles.


METHODS AND MATERIALS

Wear testing using a cemented unconstrained bicondylar knee endoprosthesis (Multigen Plus CR knee system) was performed in a knee wear simulator. Tibial polyethylene inserts were combined with the identical femoral component design, but made of two different materials (cobalt-chromium and ceramic). Bone cement debris including zirconium oxide particles was added every 500,000 cycles between the articulating surfaces. After 5 million load cycles, the amount of wear was determined gravimetrically and compared with results from standard wear test conditions. The surfaces of tibial inserts were also analyzed.


RESULTS

The average gravimetrical wear of the tibial polyethylene inserts in combination with 
cobalt-chromium and ceramic femoral components under third-body wear conditions amounted to 31.88 ± 4.53 mg and 13.06 ± 1.88 mg after 5 million cycles, respectively, and was higher than under standard wear test conditions in both cases.


CONCLUSIONS

The wear simulator test demonstrates that wear of polyethylene inserts under third-body wear conditions, in combination with ceramic femoral components, was significantly lower than with metallic femoral components.

Metal hypersensitivity testing in patients undergoing joint replacement: a systematic review

We report a systematic review and meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature focusing on metal sensitivity testing in patients undergoing total joint replacement (TJR). Our purpose was to assess the risk of developing metal hypersensitivity post-operatively and its relationship with outcome and to investigate the advantages of performing hypersensitivity testing. We undertook a comprehensive search of the citations quoted in PubMed and EMBASE: 22 articles (comprising 3634 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of positive tests increased after TJR, especially in patients with implant failure or a metal-on-metal coupling. The probability of developing a metal allergy was higher post-operatively (odds ratio (OR) 1.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 2.31)), and the risk was further increased when failed implants were compared with stable TJRs (OR 2.76 (95% CI 1.14 to 6.70)). Hypersensitivity testing was not able to discriminate between stable and failed TJRs, as its predictive value was not statistically proven. However, it is generally thought that hypersensitivity testing should be performed in patients with a history of metal allergy and in failed TJRs, especially with metal-on-metal implants and when the cause of the loosening is doubtful.

Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty: revision surgery using a ceramic femoral component - a case report

We present a case involving the revision of a total knee arthroplasty with a metal femoral component using a ceramic implant due to metal hypersensitivity. A 58-year-old female patient underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a standard metal bicondylar knee system. She suffered from persistent pain and strong limitations in her range of motion (ROM) associated with flexion during the early postoperative period. Arthroscopic arthrolysis of the knee joint and intensive active and passive physical treatment, in combination with a cortisone regime, temporarily increased the ROM and reduced pain. No signs of low grade infection or other causes of implant failure were evident. Histology of synovial tissue revealed lymphoplasmacellular fibrinous tissue, consistent with a type IV allergic reaction. Allergometry (skin reaction) revealed type IV hypersensitivity against nickel-II-sulfate and palladium chloride. Revision surgery of the metal components was performed with a cemented ceramic femoral component (same bicondylar design) and a cemented titanium alloy tibial component. Postoperative evaluations were performed 10days, and 3 and 12months after the revision surgery. There was an increased ROM in flexion to 90° at the 12month follow-up. No swelling or effusion was observed at all clinical examinations after the revision surgery. No pain at rest and moderate walking pain were evident. The presented case demonstrates that ceramic implants are a promising solution for patients suffering from hypersensitivity to metal ions in total knee arthroplasty.

Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Unconstrained Bicondylar Total Knee Endoprostheses with Anti-allergic Coating

Background:

Hypersensitivity reactions to implant materials have become more important in total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this retrospective comparative study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of unconstrained bicondylar total knee prostheses with and without anti-allergic titanium(niobium)nitrite (Ti(Nb)N) coating.

Methods:

Twenty-four patients (25 TKRs) underwent a preoperative clinical evaluation and then a postoperative evaluation after 26.2 months in the allergy group treated with coated implants (n=13 implants) and after 24.5 months in the control group treated with uncoated implants but identical geometry (n=12) using HSS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores. Radiological evaluations were performed using standard anterior-posterior (a.p.) and lateral X-rays.

Results:

During follow-up two patients of the allergy group had to undergo revision surgery due to non-implant-related reasons. A comparative analysis of both study groups showed a significant difference in the HSS scores at both evaluation time points (MW test p≤0.050); these findings are remarkable since the control group had a significantly lower score preoperatively (54.0 vs 65.0 points) and a significantly higher score (82.5 vs 75.0 points) postoperatively. The preoperative and postoperative WOMAC and SF-36 scores were comparable in both groups (MW test p≥0.052), although the postoperative increase in the score for the allergy group was lower. The radiological results were comparable in both groups and were unlikely to influence the results.

Conclusions:

This clinical study demonstrates the restricted outcome in postoperative function and quality of life in the allergy group compared to the control group.

Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants

Cutaneous reactions to metal implants, orthopedic or otherwise, are well documented in the literature. The first case of a dermatitis reaction over a stainless steel fracture plate was described in 1966. Most skin reactions are eczematous and allergic in nature, although urticarial, bullous, and vasculitic eruptions may occur. Also, more complex immune reactions may develop around the implants, resulting in pain, inflammation, and loosening. Nickel, cobalt, and chromium are the three most common metals that elicit both cutaneous and extracutaneous allergic reactions from chronic internal exposure. However, other metal ions as well as bone cement components can cause such hypersensitivity reactions. To complicate things, patients may also develop delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to metals (ie, in-stent restenosis, prosthesis loosening, inflammation, pain, or allergic contact dermatitis) following the insertion of intravascular stents, dental implants, cardiac pacemakers, or implanted gynecologic devices. Despite repeated attempts by researchers and clinicians to further understand this difficult area of medicine, the association between metal sensitivity and cutaneous allergic reactions remains to be fully understood. This review provides an update of the current knowledge in this field and should be valuable to health care providers who manage patients with conditions related to this field.