[Primary fracture protheses and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex humeral head fractures : An alternative to joint-preserving osteosynthesis?]

Proximal humerus fracture and acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Proximal humerus fractures and injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are among the most common traumatic diseases of the upper extremity. Fractures of the proximal humerus occur most frequently in older people and are an indicator fracture of osteoporosis. While a large proportion of only slightly displaced fractures can be treated non-operatively, more complex fractures require surgical treatment. The choice of optimal treatment and the decision between joint-preserving surgery by means of osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic treatment is often a difficult decision in which both fracture morphology factors and individual factors should be taken into account. If endoprosthetic treatment is indicated, satisfactory long-term functional and clinical results have been achieved with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint occur primarily in young, athletic individuals. The common classification according to Rockwood divides the injury into 6 degrees of severity depending on the dislocation. This classification forms the basis for the decision on non-operative or surgical treatment. The indication for surgical treatment for higher-grade injuries is the subject of controversial debate in the latest literature. In chronic injuries, an autologous tendon transplant is also performed. Whereas in the past, treatment was often carried out using a hook plate, which was associated with complications, the gold standard today is minimally invasive treatment using Endobutton systems. This review provides an overview of the two injury patterns and discusses the various treatment options.

The influence of fracture severity on postoperative outcome and quality of life after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures

Objective:

For proximal humeral fractures open reduction und internal fixation (ORIF) with a fixed-angle plate is considered the gold standard for surgical management. However, it can lead to poor functional outcomes and is associated with postoperative complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of fracture severity by applying a new classification (simple versus complex) on clinical outcome and quality of life after ORIF of proximal humerus fractures.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective clinical study with an average follow-up period of 12 (SD 1) months after ORIF of proximal humeral fractures with a fixed-angle plate. The postoperative function and quality of life was measured using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Constant Score. Data was tested for statistical significance with the Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test. Based on the findings of this study a simplified fracture classification system has been developed.

Results:

Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 65 years (SD 12) with 69% being males were included. According to the Neer classification, 35% (n=25) non-displaced (“one-part fractures”), 19% (n=14) two-part fractures, 15% (n=11) three-part fractures and 31% (n=22) four-part fractures were detected. Regarding the AO/OTA classification, 18% (n=13) were type A fractures, 43% (n=31) type B and 39% (n=28) type C fractures. From these criteria we derived our own fracture classification, including 50% (n=36) simple and 50% (n=36) severe fractures. Patients with simple fracture types achieved significantly higher total values in the Constant Score as well as the OSS (p=0.008; p=0.013). The cumulative incidence of complications in the entire patient collective was 14% (n=10) with humeral head necrosis (n=5) occurring only in the severe fracture group.

Conclusions:

The postoperative clinical outcome as well as the incidence of humeral head necrosis after ORIF of proximal humeral fractures with a fixed-angle plate correlates with the fracture type and severity. The newly derived fracture classification into simple and severe fractures is suitable with regard to clinical results and complication rate. However, prospective studies comparing ORIF vs. conservative treatment of proximal humeral fractures of the same severity are required.

Level of Evidence:

III

Simultaneous Bilateral Proximal Humerus Fractures Treated with Single-Stage Bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Introduction

Simultaneous bilateral fractures of the proximal humerus are infrequent, and simultaneous bilateral three- or four-part fractures are even rarer. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is being used increasingly for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. However, treatment of simultaneous bilateral fractures of the proximal humerus is difficult because of concern about postoperative immobilization and rehabilitation. Case Presentation. A 75-year-old woman presented with bilateral shoulder pain subsequent to a fall on the street. Physical examination and radiographs showed simultaneous bilateral fractures of the proximal humerus. The right side fracture was classified as a four-part fracture and the left side fracture as a three-part fracture, according to Neer's classification. The right shoulder had a risk of avascular necrosis of the humeral head. For the left shoulder, the fracture type had caused ischemia of the humeral head. Single-stage bilateral RSA was performed 9 days after the injury. An abduction pillow was applied for 5 weeks postoperatively. Passive motion exercises were permitted starting at 4 weeks postoperatively, and active range of motion exercises were permitted at 6 weeks postoperatively. At the patient's most recent follow-up 30 months after surgery, the patient reported no restriction of the activities of daily living. Radiographs revealed no lucent line on the humerus and glenoid components, although bone resorption and superior retraction of the tuberosities on both sides were observed.

Conclusions

Single-stage bilateral RSA improved shoulder function, but healing of the greater tuberosity can affect the improvement in external rotation after the operation. Although a long-term follow-up is needed, single-stage bilateral RSA appears to be a viable treatment option.

Bone Allograft and Locking Plate for Severe Proximal Humeral Fractures: Early and Late Outcomes

Background

Early failure of osteosyntheses is common even with use of locking plates. In patients with comminuted fractures and epiphyseal osseous defects, we performed a series of osteosyntheses by locking plate in combination with an allograft bone augmentation. Because of encouraging short-term results in the literature, we assumed that the method could be a potential alternative to a reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Material/Methods

Twenty-six patients with a dislocated proximal humeral fracture (Neer IV/V/VI) were studied. A lyophilized allogeneic bone graft was used to reinforce the humeral head fragments before locking plate osteosynthesis. The outcomes of fractures were assessed with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley (Constant) scores, range of motion, a visual analog scale, and with radiological testing. The Constant-Murley scores were the endpoint of our study.

Results

The Neer classification of the fractures was type IV in 4 patients, type V in 20 patients, and type VI in 2 patients. The mean DASH score was 52.85 (range, 4.17–79.3) and the mean Constant score was 39.26 (range, 17–88). We observed late necrosis of the humeral head in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), although early radiological follow-up showed that the humeral head had been anatomically reconstructed.

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up demonstrated inferior functional results, as displayed by poor Constant scores. There was a high incidence of necrosis, in spite of initial anatomical reconstruction. Biointegration of the allogeneic bone graft and revascularization of the humeral head fragments could be impaired in geriatric patients who have gross dislocation. Therefore, augmentation of the humeral head with allogeneic bone grafts cannot be recommended in these patients.

[Shoulder arthroplasty]

Arthroplasty of the shoulder joint leads to excellent clinical results if the indications are valid and the implantation is technically correct. Taking anatomical requirements and mechanical functions as well as material properties and developments in surgical techniques into account, articulations and anchoring systems have been developed which, as modular systems enable successful restoration of the biomechanics and consider the importance of the surrounding soft tissues. Scientific data show promising medium-term and long-term results in terms of functionality and pain reduction. Nevertheless, due to the limited bone stock for implant anchoring, especially loosening of the prosthesis or instability of the glenoid joint component, revision arthroplasty remains challenging. This review article summarizes the relevant aspects of shoulder arthroplasty.

Simultaneous bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty for bilateral four-part fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fracture is the third most common fracture in elderly people after fractures of proximal femur and distal radius. They typically occur after low-energy trauma in women affected by osteoporosis, bilateral involvement is rare and usually with a simple pattern of fracture. Bilateral four-part proximal humerus fractures are even less frequent, with only a few reports published previously, with all of them caused by a seizure or electrocution in patients < 65 years old.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 77-year-old right-handed female that sustained a bilateral simultaneous four-part humeral fracture secondary to accidental slip-and-fall occurred at home. Patient was treated with simultaneous bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) in our structure. Functional assessment was undertaken at 6- and 12-months follow-up (FU) after surgery, using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

OUTCOME

The simultaneous RSA procedure was well tolerated by the patient. Post-operative course was optimal with relatively low blood loss, rapid functional recovery, and fast pain relief. The CMS and DASH score were reasonably good at 6-months FU (right-left: 39-57 and 50.8-30.5, respectively) and they further improved at 1-year FU (right-left: 66-82 and 35.8-19.2, respectively). X-rays showed good position of the implants with no evidence of scapular notching at 1 year. Patient rated the overall satisfaction as good.

DISCUSSION

Bilateral four-part proximal humeral fractures are complex injuries difficult to manage. Optimal treatment is controversial, and it can be conservative or surgical, varying from open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to arthroplasty. However, this last option is still directed to only one side, preferring ORIF or conservative treatment for the contralateral. In case of comminute and displaced fractures, low bone quality, rotator cuff deficiencies and eccentric osteoarthritis, RSA is to prefer as a surgical option. For these reason, in selected cases of bilateral four parts proximal humerus fracture, especially when occurs in elderly patients, the simultaneous RSA implantation can represent a valid option to achieve an adequate functional result and a fast recovery. This is the first description, to our knowledge, in English literature of a simultaneous bilateral RSA.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: Is the glenoid implant problematic?

INTRODUCTION

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a key tool in the orthopedic trauma surgeon's arsenal, especially when faced with a proximal humerus fracture in older patients. However, few studies have focused on the glenoid side of RSA in this indication as the implant is placed in a generally healthy scapula.

HYPOTHESIS

Glenoid implants for RSA after trauma are well positioned and do not often cause complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study of 513 patients who underwent RSA because of a proximal humerus fracture. The mean follow-up was 55 months. Radiographs were used to assess the height and tilt of the glenoid implant, along with the development of scapular notching or loosening. The clinical outcomes were determined based on the Constant score.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, 44% of shoulders had scapular notching, 7% of which were severe (stages 3-4). This notching was progressive, with two resulting in loosening. The rate of severe notching was higher in patients with a high glenoid implant (62.5% vs. 42.3%, p=0.03) or glenosphere with superior tilt (58.3% vs. 37.8%, p=0.02). Nine patients had confirmed loosening and 63 had potential loosening. This was more common in cases with superior tilt (9.3% vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). Patients with a high glenoid implant had a lower Constant score (57 vs. 45, p<0.001). There fewer cases of severe notching when a lateralized glenoid implant was used (0% vs. 7%, p<0.05) and/or the humeral implant had a smaller neck-shaft angle (implants<155°: 3% vs. implants at 155°: 8.5%, p=0.03).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Glenoid loosening and severe scapular notching are related to poor positioning and/or incorrect orientation of the glenosphere. Implant selection is important, as there is little to no notching when less-angled humeral implants and lateralized glenoid implants are used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.