Sun Z, Li J, Cui H, Ruan H, Wang W, Fan C. A new pathologic classification for elbow stiffness based on our experience in 216 patients.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;
29:e75-e86. [PMID:
31678024 DOI:
10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. This study aimed to develop a new pathologic classification to further understand and standardize elbow arthrolysis from a new perspective, as well as to determine clinical outcomes.
METHODS
Extension-flexion dysfunction was classified into 4 types: EFI, tethers alone; EFII, tethers with blocks; EFIII, articular malformation; and EFIV, bony ankylosis. Forearm rotation dysfunction was classified into 3 types: FRI, contracture alone; FRII, radial head malunion or nonunion; and FRIII, proximal radioulnar bony ankylosis. A total of 216 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included and categorized preoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by the same chief surgeon; different types underwent specific procedures. Patient data, elbow motion, and functional scores were analyzed.
RESULTS
Mean range of motion (ROM) increased from 40° preoperatively to 118° at final follow-up; 88% of patients regained ROM of 100° or greater. The forearm rotation arc (FRA) with forearm rotation dysfunction increased from a preoperative mean of 76° to 128°; 82% of patients regained an FRA of 100° or greater. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) increased from 63 to 91 points; the proportion of patients with good or excellent results was 95%. EFI patients had the best ROM (129°) and MEPI (93 points) and EFIV patients achieved the most-changed ROM (116°), whereas EFIII patients had the worst ROM (104°) and MEPI (84 points) and the least-changed ROM (64°). The FRA was best in FRI patients (142°), followed by FRII patients (118°), and worst in FRIII patients (82°); in contrast, the changed FRA was greatest in FRIII patients (82°), followed by FRII patients (64°), and least in FRI patients (37°).
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that the proposed pathologic classification provides a new perspective on the understanding and standardization of elbow arthrolysis, providing satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Collapse