Validation of a new method based on ultrasound velocity dilution to measure cardiac output in paediatric patients

Quantitative assessment of left ventricular volume and function by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, ultrasound velocity dilution, and gated magnetic resonance imaging in healthy foals

OBJECTIVE

To compare measurements of left ventricular volume and function derived from 2-D transthoracic echocardiography (2DE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and the ultrasound velocity dilution cardiac output method (UDCO) with those derived from cardiac MRI (cMRI) in healthy neonatal foals.

ANIMALS

6 healthy 1-week-old Standardbred foals.

PROCEDURES

Foals were anesthetized and underwent 2DE, TEE, and cMRI; UDCO was performed simultaneously with 2DE. Images acquired by 2DE included the right parasternal 4-chamber (R4CH), left apical 4- and 2-chamber (biplane), and right parasternal short-axis M-mode (M-mode) views. The longitudinal 4-chamber view was obtained by TEE. Measurements assessed included left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), ejection fraction, stroke volume (LVSV), cardiac output (CO), and cardiac index (CI). Bland-Altman analyses were used to compare measurements derived from biplane, R4CH, and M-mode images and UDCO with cMRI-derived measurements. Repeatability of measurements calculated by 3 independent reviewers was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Compared with cMRI, all 2DE and TEE modalities underestimated LVEDV and LVESV and overestimated ejection fraction, CO, and CI. The LVSV was underestimated by the biplane, R4CH, and TEE modalities and overestimated by UDCO and M-mode methods. However, the R4CH-derived LVSV, CO, and CI were clinically comparable to cMRI-derived measures. Repeatability was good to excellent for measures derived from the biplane, R4CH, M-mode, UDCO, and cMRI methods and poor for TEE-derived measures.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

All assessed modalities yielded clinically acceptable measurements of LVEDV, LVESV, and function, but those measurements should not be used interchangeably when monitoring patient progress.

Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Clinical assessment of cardiac output by interpretation of indirect parameters has proven to be inaccurate, irrespective of the level of experience of the clinician. Objective cardiac output monitoring is feasible in newborn infants in intensive care. The most promising methods include transthoracic echocardiography, transcutaneous Doppler, electrical biosensing technologies, transpulmonary ultrasound dilution, and arterial pulse contour analysis. Simultaneous assessment of blood pressure and cardiac output enables the identification of the earliest stage of shock. Comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring is pivotal for an individualized pathophysiology-based hemodynamic management.

Indirect Calorimetry Overestimates Oxygen Consumption in Young Children: Caution is Advised Using Direct Fick Method as a Reference Method in Cardiac Output Comparison Studies

Direct Fick method is considered a standard reference method for estimation of cardiac output. It relies on indirect calorimetry to measure oxygen consumption. This is important as only a minor measurement error in oxygen consumption can result in false estimation of cardiac output. A number of studies have shown that indirect calorimetry overestimates oxygen consumption in adults. The aim of this prospective single center observational method comparison study was to compare the determination of oxygen consumption by indirect calorimetry and reverse Fick method in pediatric patients. Forty-two children mean age 352 days (range 30 to 1303 days) and mean weight 7.1 kg (range 2.7-13.6 kg) undergoing corrective cardiac surgery were included in the study. The mean (standard deviation) oxygen consumption by reverse Fick method was 43.5 (16.2) ml/min and by indirect calorimetry 49.9 (18.8) ml/min (p < 0.001). Indirect calorimetry overestimated the reverse Fick oxygen consumption by 14.7%. Bias between methods was 6.5 (11.3) ml/min, limits of agreement (LOA) - 15.7 and 28.7 ml/min and percentage error of 47.7%. A significant bias and large percentage error indicates that the methods are not interchangeable. Indirect calorimetry and the direct Fick method should be used with caution as a reference method in cardiac output comparison studies in young children.

Neonatal Hemodynamics: From Developmental Physiology to Comprehensive Monitoring

Maintenance of neonatal circulatory homeostasis is a real challenge, due to the complex physiology during postnatal transition and the inherent immaturity of the cardiovascular system and other relevant organs. It is known that abnormal cardiovascular function during the neonatal period is associated with increased risk of severe morbidity and mortality. Understanding the functional and structural characteristics of the neonatal circulation is, therefore, essential, as therapeutic hemodynamic interventions should be based on the assumed underlying (patho)physiology. The clinical assessment of systemic blood flow (SBF) by indirect parameters, such as blood pressure, capillary refill time, heart rate, urine output, and central-peripheral temperature difference is inaccurate. As blood pressure is no surrogate for SBF, information on cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance should be obtained in combination with an evaluation of end organ perfusion. Accurate and reliable hemodynamic monitoring systems are required to detect inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation at an early stage before this result in irreversible damage. Also, the hemodynamic response to the initiated treatment should be re-evaluated regularly as changes in cardiovascular function can occur quickly. New insights in the understanding of neonatal cardiovascular physiology are reviewed and several methods for current and future neonatal hemodynamic monitoring are discussed.

Measuring cardiac output in children undergoing cardiac catheterization: comparison between the Fick method and PRAM (pressure recording analytical method)

BACKGROUND

Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) is a novel, arterial pulse contour method for measuring cardiac output (CO). Validation studies of PRAM in children are few, and have shown contradictory results. The aim of the study was to compare the MostCare^® -PRAM vs the Fick method of cardiac output estimation (reference method).

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective observational study in 52 pediatric patients who underwent diagnostic right and left heart catheterization. Cardiac index (CI) measurements with the MostCare^® -PRAM vs the Fick method were obtained under hemodynamically stable conditions.

RESULTS

Forty CI measurements were performed. The data showed good agreement between CI_Fick and CI_PRAM : r² = 0.90 (P < 0.001), mean bias -0.075, limits of agreement from -0.56 to 0.41. The percentage error was 17%. Comparable results were obtained for patients <20 kg (r² = 0.87, P < 0.001), mean bias -0.135, limits of agreement from -0.35 to 0.62, percentage of error 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic right and left heart catheterization, the MostCare^® -PRAM was shown to estimate CI with a good level of agreement with the Fick method measurements.

Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Several minimally-invasive technologies are available for cardiac output (CO) measurement in children, but the accuracy and precision of these devices have not yet been evaluated in a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search of the medical literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science from its inception to June 2014 assessing the accuracy and precision of all minimally-invasive CO monitoring systems used in children when compared with CO monitoring reference methods. Pooled mean bias, standard deviation, and mean percentage error of included studies were calculated using a random-effects model. The inter-study heterogeneity was also assessed using an I(2) statistic. A total of 20 studies (624 patients) were included. The overall random-effects pooled bias, and mean percentage error were 0.13 ± 0.44 l min(-1) and 29.1 %, respectively. Significant inter-study heterogeneity was detected (P < 0.0001, I(2) = 98.3 %). In the sub-analysis regarding the device, electrical cardiometry showed the smallest bias (-0.03 l min(-1)) and lowest percentage error (23.6 %). Significant residual heterogeneity remained after conducting sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the various study characteristics. By meta-regression analysis, we found no independent effects of study characteristics on weighted mean difference between reference and tested methods. Although the pooled bias was small, the mean pooled percentage error was in the gray zone of clinical applicability. In the sub-group analysis, electrical cardiometry was the device that provided the most accurate measurement. However, a high heterogeneity between studies was found, likely due to a wide range of study characteristics.

Determination of cardiac output by ultrasound dilution technique in infants and children: a validation study against direct Fick principle

BACKGROUND

In critically ill children, monitoring of cardiac output (CO) is essential to guide haemodynamic management and facilitate cardiovascular therapy. The ultrasound dilution technique (UDT), a novel minimally invasive indicator method, was recently introduced to determine CO. We validated UDT against the 'gold standard' reference technique, the direct Fick principle, in infants and children.

METHODS

Twenty-six children (median age: 6 yr 2 months; median weight: 19.2 kg) underwent diagnostic heart catheterization. In each child, CO was determined by the Fick principle using direct measurement of oxygen consumption and invasive oximetry. Consecutively, haemodynamically stable conditions provided; three independent measurements of CO were conducted with UDT. CO values were compared using bias and limits of agreement calculated using the Bland-Altman approach and linear regression analysis for the complete study group and for a subgroup with body weight <20 kg (n=14).

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) CO values were 3.76 (1.73) litre min(-1) (range 1.38-6.97) for the direct Fick principle and 3.49 (1.72) litre min(-1) (range 1.31-7.00) for UDT. An excellent correlation (r=0.96) was found between both methods (P<0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good clinical agreement with a mean bias of 0.26 litre min(-1), limits of agreement of -0.66 and 1.19 litre min(-1), and percentage error of 25.9%. Comparable results were obtained for patients <20 kg (mean bias=0.19 litre min(-1), percentage error=25.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CO measurements by UDT agree favourably with Fick-derived CO data and both techniques were found to be equivalent and interchangeable. UDT represents a valid and applicable method for repetitive CO determinations in infants and children.