1
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gastrointestinal failure is a polymorphic syndrome with multiple causes. Managing the different situations from a practical, metabolic, and nutritional point of view is challenging, which the present review will try to address. RECENT FINDINGS Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) has been defined and has evolved into a concept of gastrointestinal dysfunction score (GIDS) built on the model of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and ranging from 0 (no risk) to 4 (life threatening). But there is yet no specific, reliable and reproducible, biomarker linked to it. Evaluating the risk with the Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) score is the first step whenever addressing nutrition therapy. Depending on the severity of the gastrointestinal failure and its clinical manifestations, nutritional management needs to be individualized but always including prevention of undernutrition and dehydration, and administration of target essential micronutrients. The use of fibers in enteral feeding solutions has gained acceptance and is even recommended based on microbiome findings. Parenteral nutrition whether alone or combined to enteral feeding is indicated whenever the intestine is unable to process the needs. SUMMARY The heterogeneity of gastrointestinal insufficiency precludes a uniform nutritional management of all critically ill patients but justifies its early detection and the implementation of individualized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette M Berger
- Service of Adult Intensive Care, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Southren DL, Nardone AD, Haastrup AA, Roberts RJ, Chang MG, Bittner EA. An examination of gastrointestinal absorption using the acetaminophen absorption test in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 36:853-862. [PMID: 34101267 PMCID: PMC8242470 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is prevalent in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The acetaminophen absorption test (AAT) has been previously described as a direct method for assessment of GI function. Our study determines whether the AAT can be used to assess GI function in critically ill COVID-19 patients, compared with traditional measures of GI function. DESIGN Retrospective observational study of critically ill patients with COVID-19. SETTING Three intensive care units at a tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS Twenty critically ill patients with COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS The results of AAT and traditional measures for assessing GI function were collected and compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Among the study cohort, 55% (11 of 20) of patients had evidence of malabsorption by AAT. Interestingly, all patients with evidence of malabsorption by AAT had clinical evidence of bowel function, as indicated by stool output and low gastric residuals during the prior 24 h. When comparing patients with a detectable acetaminophen level (positive AAT) with those who had undetectable acetaminophen levels (negative AAT), radiologic evidence of ileus was less frequent (20 vs 88%; P = .03), tolerated tube-feed rates were higher (40 vs 10 ml/h; P =.01), and there was a trend toward lower gastric residual volumes (45 vs 830 ml; P =.11). CONCLUSION Malabsorption can occur in critically ill patients with COVID-19 despite commonly used clinical indicators of tube-feeding tolerance. The AAT provides a simple, rapid, and cost-effective mechanism by which enteral function can be efficiently assessed in COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Southren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexa D Nardone
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adeniran A Haastrup
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Russel J Roberts
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marvin G Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward A Bittner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boullata JI. Enteral Medication for the Tube-Fed Patient: Making This Route Safe and Effective. Nutr Clin Pract 2020; 36:111-132. [PMID: 33373487 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The administration of medication through an enteral access device requires important forethought. Meeting a patient's therapeutic needs requires achieving expected drug bioavailability without increasing the risk for toxicity, therapeutic failure, or feeding tube occlusion. Superimposing gut dysfunction, critical illness, or enteral nutrition-drug interaction further increases the need for a systematic approach to prescribing, evaluating, and preparing a drug for administration through an enteral access device. This review will explain the fundamental factors involved in drug bioavailability through the gut, address the influencing considerations for the enterally fed patient, and describe best practices for enteral drug preparation and administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph I Boullata
- Department of Clinical Nutrition Support Services, Penn Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdul-Aziz MH, Alffenaar JWC, Bassetti M, Bracht H, Dimopoulos G, Marriott D, Neely MN, Paiva JA, Pea F, Sjovall F, Timsit JF, Udy AA, Wicha SG, Zeitlinger M, De Waele JJ, Roberts JA. Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper .. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1127-1153. [PMID: 32383061 PMCID: PMC7223855 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06050-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 526] [Impact Index Per Article: 131.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This Position Paper aims to review and discuss the available data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibacterials, antifungals and antivirals in critically ill adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This Position Paper also provides a practical guide on how TDM can be applied in routine clinical practice to improve therapeutic outcomes in critically ill adult patients.
Methods Literature review and analysis were performed by Panel Members nominated by the endorsing organisations, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC). Panel members made recommendations for whether TDM should be applied clinically for different antimicrobials/classes. Results TDM-guided dosing has been shown to be clinically beneficial for aminoglycosides, voriconazole and ribavirin. For most common antibiotics and antifungals in the ICU, a clear therapeutic range has been established, and for these agents, routine TDM in critically ill patients appears meritorious. For the antivirals, research is needed to identify therapeutic targets and determine whether antiviral TDM is indeed meritorious in this patient population. The Panel Members recommend routine TDM to be performed for aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin and voriconazole in critically ill patients. Conclusion Although TDM should be the standard of care for most antimicrobials in every ICU, important barriers need to be addressed before routine TDM can be widely employed worldwide. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06050-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd H Abdul-Aziz
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa and Hospital Policlinico San Martino - IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Hendrik Bracht
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - George Dimopoulos
- Department of Critical Care, University Hospital Attikon, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Deborah Marriott
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael N Neely
- Department of Paediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jose-Artur Paiva
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Federico Pea
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, SM Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
| | - Fredrik Sjovall
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jean F Timsit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Infection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution (IAME), Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Andrew A Udy
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sebastian G Wicha
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan J De Waele
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jason A Roberts
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia. .,Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Pharmacy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,Centre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
May F, Fourati S, Mekontso Dessap A, de Prost N. Antiviral treatment strategy should be individualized in critically ill patients with severe influenza. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1292-1293. [PMID: 32291461 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06032-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faten May
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor - Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.,Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Est Créteil, IMRB, Créteil, France
| | - Slim Fourati
- Département de Microbiologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Armand Mekontso Dessap
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor - Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.,Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Est Créteil, IMRB, Créteil, France
| | - Nicolas de Prost
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor - Albert Chenevier, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France. .,Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Est Créteil, IMRB, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|