Hemofiltration in septic patients is not able to alter the plasma concentration of cytokines therapeutically

CytoSorb® in burn patients with septic shock and Acute Kidney Injury on Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy is associated with improved clinical outcome and survival

BACKGROUND

In burn patients, septic shock and acute kidney injury (AKI) with use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) severely increase morbidity and mortality. Sorbent therapies could be an adjunctive therapy to address the underlying metabolic changes in inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines dysregulated production.

METHODS

A retrospectively observational study of 35 severe burn patients admitted to the Burn Center (Turin, Italy, from January 2017 to December 2022), who underwent CRRT for AKI-associated septic shock. Out of 35 patients, 11 were treated with CytoSorb® as adjunctive therapy to CRRT (Sorbent group) and 24 patients only with CRRT (Control group).

RESULTS

The application of CytoSorb® took place in a very dispersed way. Out of 11 patients, 7 started the CRRT together with the sorbent application. The patients of the sorbent group exhibited a significant reduction in norepinephrine use compared to that of the control group. A clinical improvement over the first 4 days of Cytosorb® was observed in both survivors and no survivors of the sorbent group, with significant norepinephrine decreased use on day 4 compared to day 1. In-hospital mortality was 45.4% and 70.8% in the sorbent and control group, respectively, and significantly better at Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 270 days (p = 0.0445). In both groups, all survivor patients recovered renal function at discharge, whereas no survivors did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive treatment with CytoSorb® for burn patients with AKI-CRRT and septic shock poorly responsive to standard therapy led to a significant clinical improvement, and was associated with a lower mortality rate compared to CRRT alone.

Effect of CytoSorb Coupled with Hemodialysis on Interleukin-6 and Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Excessive release of cytokines during systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) often leads to refractory hypotension and multiple organ failure with high mortality. Cytokine removal with hemoadsorption has emerged as a possible adjuvant therapy, but data on interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduction and outcomes in clinical practice are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CytoSorb hemoadsorption on laboratory and clinical outcomes in shocked patients with SIRS. We designed a retrospective analysis of all patients with SIRS treated with CytoSorb in intensive care units (ICU). IL-6, laboratory and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed at approximate time intervals during CytoSorb treatment in the whole cohort and in a subgroup with septic shock. Observed and predicted mortality rates were compared. We included 118 patients with various etiologies of SIRS (septic shock 69%, post-resuscitation shock 16%, SIRS with acute pancreatitis 6%, other 9%); in all but one patient, CytoSorb was coupled with renal replacement therapy. A statistically significant decrease in IL-6 and vasopressor index with an increase in pH and mean arterial pressure was observed from 6 h onward. The reduction of lactate became significant at 48 h. Results were similar in a subgroup of patients with septic shock. Observed ICU and in-hospital mortalities were lower than predicted by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (61% vs. 79%, p = 0.005) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II (64% vs. 78%, p = 0.031) scores. To conclude, hemoadsorption in shocked patients with SIRS was associated with a rapid decrease in IL-6 and hemodynamic improvement, with improved observed vs. predicted survival. These results need to be confirmed in a randomized study.

The Influence of HES on the Filtration Properties of Capillary Membrane Plasmaseparation

Plasmaseparation is a treatment under discussion for critically ill patients, especially in sepsis and multiorgan failure. These patients receive a variety of different fluid substitutes, including hydroxyethylstarch (HES). HES is known to influence rheological properties, but nothing is known about the possible interactions between HES and the plamaseparation procedure. We used an in vitro plasmaseparation circuit with heparinized porcine blood. Before priming the system, 2 liters of blood were supplemented by adding 100 ml of either NaCl 0.9% or HES (n=6 in each group). We monitored the transmembrane (TMP) and the filtration pressure (PF) and measured free plasma hemoglobin (free Hb) and platelet counts before and after the two hours plasmaseparation procedure. The final transmembrane pressure was significantly higher with HES substitution. In the HES group we found negative filtration pressures from the very beginning with a significant further decrease toward the end of the experiments. A significant increase in free Hb and decrease in platelet counts were noted only in the HES group. Volume substitution with HES leads to impaired filtration properties and deteriorated hemocompatibility in in vitro plasmaseparation. Further studies have yet to evaluate whether or not the effects described also occur under clinical conditions.

A patient with AKI after cardiac surgery

Up to 30% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery develop AKI, with 1% requiring RRT. AKI is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Postoperatively, even minimal changes in serum creatinine are associated with a substantial increase in mortality. No intervention has been definitely proven effective in reducing kidney injury. The successful prevention and management of AKI involves identifying patients at risk for AKI, recognizing subtle abnormalities in a timely manner, performing basic clinical assessments, and responding appropriately to data obtained. With that in mind, in this Attending Rounds, a woman with AKI in the setting of cardiac surgery is presented to highlight the use of history, physical exam, hemodynamic monitoring, laboratory data trends, and urine indices in establishing the correct diagnosis and appropriate management.

New insights regarding rationale, therapeutic target and dose of hemofiltration and hybrid therapies in septic acute kidney injury

Mediator removal from tissue (capillary blood compartment, CABC) and transport to the central circulation (central blood compartment, CEBC) must be effective. Effectiveness through a passive mechanism seems unlikely as the surface of CEBC (30 m(2)) is smaller than CABC (300 m(2)) whereby the former will be a limiting factor in passive transport. According to studies, a high exchange volume can induce an 80-fold increase in lymphatic flow. This results in displacement (active transport) of mediators to CEBC. Recent studies have shown that the delivered dose constitutes the mainstay of continuous renal replacement therapy. However, these results are not likely to change the recommendation: 35 ml/kg/h, adjusted for predilution, in septic acute kidney injury (AKI). Recently, studies were focusing on global intensive care unit AKI. In non-septic AKI, those studies show that 20-25 ml/kg/h was optimal. The DO-RE-MI trial underscored the importance of delivery which could be obtained by targeting doses between 5 and 10 ml/kg/h higher than prescribed. Until the IVOIRE trial becomes available, septic AKI should be treated by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration at 35 ml/kg/h. In non-septic AKI, 25 ml/kg/h remains optimal.

Effect of the intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury: a single-center randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication in patients with sepsis and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, the optimal intensity of renal replacement therapy for such patients is still controversial.

METHODS

From 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2009, we randomly assigned 280 patients with sepsis and AKI to continuous renal replacement therapy by high-volume hemofiltration (50 mL/kg/h, HVHF) or extra high-volume hemofiltration (85 mL/kg/h, EHVHF). The primary study outcome was death from any cause within 28, 60 and 90 days. Results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods and by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were given EHVHF and 139 were given HVHF. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and received treatment for an average of 9.38 days (EHVHF group) and 8.88 days (HVHF group). There were no significant differences between the groups in number of deaths at 28, 60 or 90 days. There were also no differences between the groups in renal outcome of survivors at 90 days. Multivariate analysis indicated that inotropic support by norepinephrine, time in hospital of >7 days, blood platelet count <8 × 10(9)/L, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score >25, total bilirubin >100 μmol/L, prothrombin time >18 s, serum creatinine <250 μmol/L and blood urea nitrogen >20 mmol/L were independent risk factors for death at 90 days after initiation of renal replacement therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sepsis and AKI, increasing the intensity of renal replacement therapy from 50 (HVHF) to 85 mL/kg/h (EHVHF) had no effect on survival at 28 and 90 days.

Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI))

Practice guidelines are systematically developed statements and recommendations that assist the physicians and patients in making decisions about appropriate health care measures for specific clinical circumstances taking into account specific national health care structures. The 1^st revision of the S-2k guideline of the German Sepsis Society in collaboration with 17 German medical scientific societies and one self-help group provides state-of-the-art information (results of controlled clinical trials and expert knowledge) on the effective and appropriate medical care (prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care) of critically ill patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The guideline had been developed according to the “German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal” of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF). In view of the inevitable advancements in scientific knowledge and technical expertise, revisions, updates and amendments must be periodically initiated. The guideline recommendations may not be applied under all circumstances. It rests with the clinician to decide whether a certain recommendation should be adopted or not, taking into consideration the unique set of clinical facts presented in connection with each individual patient as well as the available resources.

Renal replacement strategies in the ICU

Acute renal failure (ARF) with the concomitant need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a common complication of critical care medicine that is still associated with high mortality. Different RRT strategies, like intermittent hemodialysis, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, or hybrid forms that combine the advantages of both techniques, are available and will be discussed in this article. Since a general survival benefit has not been demonstrated for either method, it is the task of the nephrologist or intensivist to choose the RRT strategy that is most advantageous for each individual patient. The underlying disease, its severity and stage, the etiology of ARF, the clinical and hemodynamic status of the patient, the resources available, and the different costs of therapy may all influence the choice of the RRT strategy. ARF, with its risk of uremic complications, represents an independent risk factor for outcome in critically ill patients. In addition, the early initiation of RRT with adequate doses is associated with improved survival. Therefore, the "undertreatment" of ARF should be avoided, and higher RRT doses than those in patients with chronic renal insufficiency, independent of whether convective or diffusive methods are used, are indicated in critically ill patients. However, clear guidelines on the dose of RRT and the timing of initiation are still lacking. In particular, it remains unclear whether hemodynamically unstable patients with septic shock benefit from early RRT initiation and the use of increased RRT doses, and whether RRT can lead to a clinically relevant removal of inflammatory mediators.

Renal replacement therapy in the treatment of acute renal failure-intermittent and continuous

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is increasingly used in intensive care as acute renal failure (ARF) is a common and constantly increasing complication in this setting. Different forms of RRT such as intermittent hemodialysis, continuous hemofiltration, or hybrid forms, which combine advantages of both, are available and will be discussed in this article. As a general survival benefit for neither method has been demonstrated, it is the task of the nephrologist or intensivist to choose the RRT strategy that is most advantageous for each individual patient. The choice of RRT might depend not only on the underlying disease, the time course of the disease, the etiology of ARF, the actual clinical status of the patient but also on the resources available and the cost of therapy. An adequate dose of RRT seems to result in improved survival in patients with ARF. However, clear guidelines on the dose of RRT and the timing of initiation are still lacking. Moreover, it will be discussed whether patients with sepsis and septic shock benefit from early RRT initiation, the use of increased RRT doses, and increased removal of inflammatory mediators by RRT.

Pilot study on the effects of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure

OBJECTIVE

High cutoff hemofilters are characterized by an increased effective pore size designed to facilitate the elimination of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. Clinical data on this new renal replacement modality are lacking.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital, intensive care units.

PATIENTS

: Thirty patients with sepsis-induced acute renal failure.

INTERVENTION

Patients were allocated to high cutoff (n = 20) or conventional (n = 10) hemofiltration in a 2:1 ratio. Median renal replacement dose was 31 mL/kg/hr. For high cutoff hemofiltration, a high-flux hemofilter with an in vivo cutoff point of approximately 60 kilodaltons was used. Conventional hemofiltration was performed with a standard high-flux hemofilter (PF11S). The impacts of high cutoff hemofiltration on the need for norepinephrine and on plasma levels and clearance rates for interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) were analyzed. Absolute values, but also adjusted values (expressed as proportion of baseline), were analyzed. The observation period was restricted to 48 hrs.

MAIN RESULTS

Apart from higher antithrombin III levels at entry into the study, main clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable between both groups. The median norepinephrine dose at entry into the study was 0.30 microg/kg/min in the high cutoff group and 0.21 microg/kg/min in the conventional hemofiltration group (p = .448). Only the high cutoff group showed a significant decline (p = .0002) in "adjusted" norepinephrine dose over time. Clearance rates for IL-6 and IL-1ra were significantly higher in the high cutoff hemofiltration group (p < .0001), which translated into a significant decline of the corresponding plasma levels (p = .0465 for IL-6; p = .0293 for IL-1ra).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, high cutoff hemofiltration has been shown to exert a beneficial effect on the need for norepinephrine in septic patients with acute renal failure. In addition, we demonstrate that high cutoff hemofiltration is superior to conventional hemofiltration in the elimination of IL-6 and IL-1ra from the circulating blood of septic patients.

Large-Pore Membrane Hemofiltration Increases Cytokine Clearance and Improves Right Ventricular-Vascular Coupling During Endotoxic Shock in Pigs

Hemodynamic improvement in patients suffering from both septic shock and renal failure who received hemofiltration suggested that an extrarenal epuration technique could be of interest in patients with septic shock alone. However, most of the studies using continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in this setting evidenced neither cytokine clearance nor significant reduction in their plasma level. Lack of significant clearance was explained in part by the small size of the membrane pores. Therefore, we investigated the effects of large-pore membrane hemofiltration (LPHF) during endotoxic shock in pigs on interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) clearances, and on right ventricular (RV)-vascular coupling. Thirteen anesthetized healthy pigs weighing 20-30 kg were divided into two groups. In the Endo group (n = 6), the pigs received a 0.5-mg/kg endotoxin infusion over a period of 30 mins from T0 to T30. In the EndoHF group (n = 7), LPHF (cutoff = 80 kDa) and an ultrafiltration rate of 45 mL/kg/h were started 30 mins after the end of the endotoxin infusion, from T60 to T240. In this model of porcine endotoxic shock, LPHF was responsible for a significant clearance of IL-6 (20 mL/min) and Il-10 (14 mL/min), and for an improvement in RV-vascular coupling.

Extracorporeal Therapies in the Treatment of Sepsis: Experience and Promise

Desire to restore the balance of body elements has enamored physicians since the ancient practice of bloodletting. More recently, extracorporeal techniques have been employed in both adults and children in treating sepsis. Extracorporeal therapies include continuous renal replacement (CRRT), plasma-based removal techniques, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These treatments could theoretically 1) provide immunohomeostasis of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and other sepsis mediators, 2) decrease organ microthrombosis through removal of pro-coagulant factors and modulating the impaired septic coagulation response in sepsis, and 3) provide mechanical support of organ perfusion during the acute septic episode to allow time for response to traditional sepsis therapies and antimicrobials. CRRT is beneficial in managing fluid overload and acute renal failure in sepsis. Removal of sepsis mediators through the technique is variable, and the outcome impact of CRRT on sepsis has not been definitively determined. High-flow CRRT has demonstrated benefit in septic adults. Intriguing early results suggest that plasma exchange could improve outcomes in both adults and children. Based on experience, ECMO is recommended for refractory septic shock in neonates and should be considered for use in children. Ongoing trials may help determine whether the promise of extracorporeal therapies translates into outcome improvement in septic children.

Renal replacement therapy with high-cutoff hemofilters: Impact of convection and diffusion on cytokine clearances and protein status

BACKGROUND

High-cutoff hemofilters are characterized by an increased effective pore size designed to facilitate the elimination of inflammatory mediators in sepsis. This study compares diffusive versus convective high-cutoff renal replacement therapy (RRT) in terms of cytokine clearance rates and effects on plasma protein levels.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with sepsis-induced acute renal failure were studied. A polyflux hemofilter with a cutoff point of approximately 60 kd was used for RRT. Patients were randomly allocated to either continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with an ultrafiltration rate of 1 L/h (group 1) or 2.5 L/h (group 2) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) with a dialysate flow rate of 1 L/h (group 3) or 2.5 L/h (group 4). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-1beta, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and plasma proteins were measured daily.

RESULTS

CVVH achieved significantly greater IL-1ra clearance compared with CVVHD (P = 0.0003). No difference was found for IL-6 (P = 0.935). Increasing ultrafiltration volume or dialysate flow led to a highly significant increase in IL-1ra and IL-6 clearance rates (P < 0.00001). Peak clearances were 46 mL/min for IL-1ra and 51 mL/min for IL-6. TNF-alpha clearance was poor for both RRT modalities. A significant decline in plasma IL-1ra and IL-6 clearance was observed in patients with high baseline levels. Protein and albumin losses were greatest during the 2.5-L/h hemofiltration mode.

CONCLUSION

High-cutoff RRT is a novel strategy to clear cytokines more effectively. Convection has an advantage over diffusion in the clearance capacity of IL-1ra, but is associated with greater plasma protein losses.

Effects of continuous venovenous haemofiltration-induced cooling on global haemodynamics, splanchnic oxygen and energy balance in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

A number of haemodialysis studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of cooler dialysates on global haemodynamics in chronic dialysis patients. However, the effects of continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH)-induced cooling on regional perfusion and energy metabolism in critically ill septic patients have not been well defined.

METHODS

Nine septic mechanically ventilated patients (age 40-69 years) were investigated during CVVH (ultrafiltration 30-35 ml/kg/h). Baseline data (=WARM 1) were collected when core temperature (Tc) was >37.5 degrees C; the second data set (=COLD) was obtained after 120 min of 'cooling'; and a third set (=WARM 2) was obtained after 120 min of 'rewarming'. During 'warming' (WARM 1 and 2, respectively), both substitution fluids (SFs) and 'returned' blood (RB) were warmed (37 degrees C), whereas during 'cooling', the SFs were at 20 degrees C and RB was not warmed. We measured hepatic venous (HV) haemoglobin oxygen saturation (ShvO(2)), blood gases, lactate and pyruvate. Gastric mucosal PCO(2) (PgmCO(2)) was measured by air tonometry and the gastric mucosal - arterial PCO(2) difference (PCO(2) gap) was calculated. Haemodynamic monitoring was performed with arterial and pulmonary arterial thermodilution catheters.

RESULTS

Tcs were significantly altered [WARM 1, 37.9 degrees C (37.6, 38.3); COLD, 36.8 degrees C (36.3, 37.1); WARM 2, 37.5 degrees C (37.0, 38.0); P<0.001; data are median, 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively]. Systemic vascular resistance significantly increased during cooling. As a result, mean arterial pressure increased. Cooling was associated with significant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, systemic oxygen delivery and consumption. ShvO(2) did not change [WARM 1, 51.0% (44.0, 59.5); COLD, 49.0% (42.0, 58.0); WARM 2, 51.0% (46.0, 57.0); P = NS]. The splanchnic oxygen extraction ratio, the HV lactate to pyruvate ratio, HV acid base status and PCO(2) gap remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Mild core cooling induced by CVVH may not affect hepatosplanchnic oxygen and energy balance in septic critically ill patients, even though it affects global haemodynamics.

Intermittent high permeability hemofiltration in septic patients with acute renal failure

OBJECTIVE

High permeability hemofiltration (HP-HF) is a new renal replacement modality designed to facilitate the elimination of cytokines in sepsis. Clinical safety data on this new procedure is still lacking. This study investigates the effects of HP-HF on the protein and coagulation status as well as on cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with septic shock. In addition, the clearance capacity for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is analyzed.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-center pilot trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixteen patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) induced by septic shock were studied.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated by intermittent high permeability hemofiltration (iHP-HF; nominal cut-off point: 60 kilodaltons). Intermittent HP-HF was performed over 5 days for 12 h per day and alternated with conventional hemofiltration.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Intermittent HP-HF proved to be a safe hemofiltration modality in regard to cardiovascular hemodynamics and its impact on the coagulation status. However, transmembrane protein loss occurred and cumulative 12-h protein loss was 7.60 g (IQR: 6.2-12.0). The filtration capacity for IL-6 was exceptionally high. The IL-6 sieving coefficient approximated 1 throughout the study period. The total plasma IL-6 burden, estimated by area under curve analysis, declined over time ( p<0.001 vs baseline). The TNF-alpha elimination capacity was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

High permeability hemofiltration is a new approach in the adjuvant therapy of sepsis that facilitates the elimination of cytokines. HP-HF alternating with conventional hemofiltration is well tolerated. Further studies are needed to analyze whether HP-HF is able to mitigate the course of sepsis.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration: effects on monocyte and lymphocyte immunophenotype in critically ill patients

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) increases HLA-DR expression on monocytes and T lymphocytes in critically ill patients. 24 septic (SP) and 10 non-septic (NSP) medical ICU patients with acute renal failure were studied prospectively. The ultrafiltration rate was 20-30 ml.kg(-1).h(-1). The total and differential white cell counts were measured and CD3+ lymphocyte count, HLA-DR expression on CD14+ monocytes and CD3+ lymphocytes were analysed by two-colour flow cytometry before, 4 and 24 h after CVVH initiation, respectively. CVVH did not influence leukocyte, granulocyte, total lymphocyte and CD3+ lymphocyte counts in both groups of patients. The percentage of HLA-DR+/CD14+ monocytes in SP revealed no changes, whereas it decreased after 4 h of CWH in NSP (p < 0.05). The percentage of HLA-DR+/CD3+ lymphocytes in SP decreased after 24 h (p < 0.05), whereas it remained unchanged in NSP. We conclude that CWH initiation is not associated with the increase of HLA-DR expression on CD14+ monocytes and T lymphocytes in critically ill patients with acute renal failure.