Surgical treatment of multiple knee ligament injuries in 44 patients: 2-8 years follow-up results

The known and unknown reality of knee dislocations: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Knee dislocations (KD) are limb threatening injuries known to cause significant dysfunction and disability. This review aims to summarize KD knowledge and uncover areas where more research is needed.

METHODS

The published literature was queried according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible for inclusion were clinical studies of knee dislocations. Studies published before 1990, or that focused on patellofemoral dislocation were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 132 studies involving 43,869 knee dislocations were analyzed. The majority of patients were young adult males, with high-velocity trauma, particularly motor vehicle accidents, being the most common cause. Substance use and alcohol involvement were commonly reported. The predominant KD types were KD III (54.8 %) and KD IV (20.5 %). Meniscal tears were observed in over 50 % of cases, while cartilage injuries were present in 26.7 %. Neurovascular complications were significant, with popliteal artery injuries in 7.8 % and peroneal nerve injuries in 15.3 % of patients. Acute ligament repairs (64.2 %) were more common than delayed repairs (35.8 %), although the average time to repair was 56.1 days. Complications included amputations (2.3 %), fatalities (1.9 %), compartment syndrome (2.7 %), deep infection (5.3 %), and heterotopic ossification (21.6 %). Despite these severe injuries, a substantial loss to follow-up (19 %) and underreporting of functional outcomes were noted, limiting the comprehensive assessment of long-term recovery. A notable percentage of patients did not return to work or sports, with many requiring a change in profession due to their injuries, but these outcomes were only reported in 10 or fewer studies.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant gaps in understanding the treatment strategies, financial burden, and long-term outcomes of knee dislocations. The incomplete data, particularly the high loss to follow-up rates and underreported functional outcomes, hinders the ability to make comprehensive assessments. Available results should thusly be interpreted with an understanding of the gaps in data, however return to sport and prior employment is often not achieved. Additionally, the potential influence of socioeconomic factors and substance abuse on treatment decisions and outcomes remains inadequately explored. Future research should focus on these areas to improve the management and prognosis of patients with knee dislocations, ensuring more accurate and thorough evaluations of long-term recovery and quality of life.

Timing of Surgery & Rehabilitation After Multiligamentous Knee Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of the current evidence of the timing of surgery and rehabilitation after multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) and offer insights into the ongoing multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the complexity of the MKLIs, they are usually treated surgically with the goal of either repairing or reconstructing the injured ligaments. Although the current literature on MLKIs is relatively extensive, the consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following surgery for MLKIs is still lacking. While current literature mostly suggests early treatment, there is also evidence preferring delayed treatment. Furthermore, evidence on the timing of postoperative rehabilitation is limited. Thus, the current multi-center randomized controlled study, the 'STaR trial', is expected to respond to these questions by adding new high-level evidence. The MLKIs are often associated with knee dislocation and constitute a highly complex entity, including concomitant injuries, such as neurovascular, meniscal, and cartilaginous injuries. The treatment of MLKIs usually aims to either repair or reconstruct the injured ligaments, however, there is no general consensus on the timing of surgery or rehabilitation following an MLKI surgery. This current review stresses the need for more high-level research to address the paucity of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of complex MLKIs.

Comparative study of the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of chronic multiligament knee injury

BACKGROUND

Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopaedic knee problem, usually following traumatic knee dislocation. Surgical management is preferred and has resulted in better clinical outcomes. However, the optimal surgical treatment protocol is continuously evolving. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of MLKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective comparative study was conducted between July 2020 and December 2023 at a government orthopaedic hospital in Nigeria. The inclusion criteria include males and females between 18 and 45 years of age who had one- or two staged knee reconstructions for MLKI and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The exclusion criteria were patients below 18 and above 45 years of age, those with previous knee surgery, those associated with femoral or tibia fractures, those with radiological evidence of osteoarthritis, and those with follow-ups less than 12 months. Clinical outcomes using the Lysholm scoring system and complication rate were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (26 in the OS group and 25 in the TS group) were studied. There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.86 and 0.57 for OS and TS, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.918).

CONCLUSION

One-stage and two-stage reconstruction of chronic MLKI give similar excellent clinical outcomes.

Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined 'a priori' if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Multiligament Knee Injuries in a Cohort Including Competitive Athletes With Long-Term Follow-Up

Background

There is a paucity of outcomes data on surgical reconstruction for multiligament knee injury (MLKI) in the orthopaedic literature.

Purpose

To examine functional and return-to-sports (RTS) outcomes and revision rates after single-stage reconstruction for MLKIs in a cohort containing a large proportion of competitive athletes over a 20-year period.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We identified all patients at our institution who underwent surgical reconstruction for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or bicruciate (ACL-posterior cruciate ligament) MLKI between 2001 and 2020 and had ≥2 years of postoperative outcome data. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, a surgical satisfaction survey, and questions about subsequent knee surgery and RTS administered via telephone. Summary statistics for all outcomes data were calculated, and predictors of IKDC scores at follow-up were examined using univariable linear regression.

Results

Out of 151 patients eligible for this study, outcomes data were collected in 119 patients (79%). The mean follow-up time was 8.3 ± 4.4 years, and the mean IKDC score at follow-up was 79 ± 17. A total of 83 competitive athletes were included; 62 of these athletes attempted to return to preinjury sport. Among the 62 who attempted RTS, 50 (81%) were successful, and 12 were unable to return due to limitations from their surgery. At follow-up, 112 of the overall cohort of 119 patients (94%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome, and 91% stated the surgery met or exceeded their expectations. In addition, 24% had subsequent ipsilateral knee operations after their index multiligament knee reconstruction. Older age at surgery and female sex were associated with worse IKDC scores at follow-up.

Conclusion

Despite the severity of the injuries in our cohort, we found high levels of patient-reported function and a high rate of successful RTS in the competitive athletes. Older age and female sex were associated with worse patient-reported knee function at follow-up.

Effect of Timing of Surgery on the Outcomes and Complications in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and A Meta-analysis

Background and Aims

Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI) are serious and challenging to manage. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of surgical timing on both early and long-term outcomes following an MLKI.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy was employed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were identified using a combination of relevant keywords encompassing "multi-ligament knee injury," "knee dislocation," "reconstruction," "repair," "surgery," and "timing," and their synonyms, along with appropriate Boolean operators. Selection of articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) adhered to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted utilizing data extracted from primary studies.

Results

Early surgery for MLKI demonstrated a significant advantage over delayed surgery, reflected by significantly higher Lysholm scores (Mean Difference [MD] 3.51; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.79, 5.22), IKDC objective scores (Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio [MH-OR] 2.95; 95% CI 1.30, 6.69), Tegner activity scores (MD 0.38; 95% CI 0.08, 0.69), and Mayer's ratings (MH-OR 5.47; 95% CI 1.27, 23.56). In addition, we found a significantly reduced risk of secondary chondral lesions (MH-OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.23, 0.48), lower instrumented anterior tibial translation in the early surgery group (MD -0.92; 95% CI -1.83, -0.01), but no significant difference was observed in the secondary meniscal tears, between the two groups. However, the early surgery group also exhibited a significantly increased risk of knee stiffness (MH-OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.22, 5.01) and a greater likelihood of requiring manipulation under anaesthesia (MH-OR 3.91; 95% CI 1.10, 13.87).

Conclusion

Early surgery for MLKI improves function, and stability, and reduces further articular cartilage damage, but increases the risk of stiffness.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01224-1.

Outcomes after multiligament knee injury worsen over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are devastating injuries that can have life-long consequences. A management plan requires the decision to perform surgery or not, timing of surgery, consideration of repair versus reconstruction, reconstruction technique and reconstruction graft choice. The purpose of this study was to analyze development of clinical outcomes of MLKIs over time at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Four databases were queried for surgical outcome-based studies of MLKIs published from 01/2000 through 09/2022 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Technique articles, nonoperative treatment, arthroplasty, pediatric and review articles were excluded. Study characteristics including design, number of patients, age, follow-up period, anatomical region and posterior-cruciate ligament (PCL)-based injury were collected. Primary outcomes were Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome scores and Tegner activity score. Random-effects model analysis was performed.

RESULTS

After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3571 patients in 79 studies were included in the analysis. The mean age at surgery was 35.6 years. The mean follow-up was 4.06 years (range 2-12.7). The mean Lysholm score at 2-year follow-up was 86.09 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.90-89.28], with a yearly decrease of -0.80 [95% CI: -1.47 -0.13], (p = 0.0199). The mean IKDC at 2 years was 81.35 [95% CI: 76.56-86.14], with a yearly decrease of -1.99 [95% CI: -3.14 -0.84] (p < 0.001). Non-PCL-based injuries had a higher IKDC 83.69 [75.55-91.82] vs. 75.00 [70.75-79.26] (p = 0.03) and Lysholm score 90.84 [87.10-94.58] versus 84.35 [82.18-86.52] (p < 0.01) than PCL-based injuries, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to the present systematic review and meta-analysis of MLKIs with minimum 2-year follow-ups, the patients who suffered an MLKI can expect to retain around 80-85% of knee function at 2 years and can expect a yearly deterioration of knee function, depending on the score used. Inferior outcomes can be expected for PCL-based injuries at 2 years postoperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV meta-analysis.

Long-term Outcomes of Multiligament Knee Injuries in American Football Players

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes for isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in competitive American football athletes are well reported in the literature, but little data currently exist regarding multiligament knee injury (MLKI) reconstruction outcomes.

PURPOSE

To examine patient-reported and return-to-sport outcomes of competitive American football athletes who underwent primary, single-staged, multiligament knee reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We identified patients from our institution's prospectively collected data repository between 2001 and 2020 who underwent single-staged surgical reconstruction of an MLKI sustained during competitive participation in American football. We assessed patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and questions regarding surgical satisfaction and return to sport. Successful return to sport was defined as a return to preinjury level of competition. We summarized all outcome data and compared outcomes between 2-ligament and >2-ligament groups and between ACL-only MLKI injury and bicruciate MLKI injury groups using independent t test for IKDC scores and chi-square test for return to sport. Additionally, we evaluated predictors of postoperative IKDC scores using linear regression and predictors of return to sport using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Outcome data were successfully collected for 53 of 73 total eligible patients (73%; mean follow-up time, 7.7 ± 4.0 years; all male; mean age at surgery, 18.1 ± 2.7 years). The mean postoperative IKDC score was 84 ± 16. The most common level of preinjury competition was high school (n = 36; 68%), followed by college (n = 10; 19%). Seven patients did not return to sport competition at any level due to limitations from their knee surgery, and 82% of patients that attempted to return to preinjury level of sport were able to do so. A total of 50 patients (94%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgical outcome. The 2-ligament (n = 39) and >2-ligament (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .96) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Similarly, the ACL-MLKI injury (n = 39) and bicruciate MLKI injury (n = 14) groups did not significantly differ in IKDC scores (P = .89) or proportions with successful return to sport (P = .77). Age and body mass index were not significantly associated with IKDC scores or successful return to sport at follow-up (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study may represent the largest cohort of competitive American football athletes evaluated for longitudinal outcomes after multiligament knee reconstruction. Despite the severity of these injuries, we found good knee-related function and that the large majority of athletes who attempted to return to sport were successful. The majority of athletes (94%) were satisfied with their operative treatment.

Treating Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Operatively in the Acute Setting Is Potentially Advantageous

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) remains among the most common knee injury patterns in orthopaedics. Optimal treatment of grade III MCL injuries is still debated, especially when combined with ACL injury. Most patients with these severe injuries are treated conservatively for at least 6 weeks to allow for MCL healing, followed by delayed ACL reconstruction. Although acute treatment of the MCL was common in the 1970s, postoperative stiffness was frequently reported. Moreover, studies of such treatment failed to show clinical benefits of surgical over conservative treatment, and the MCL exhibited intrinsic healing capacity, leading to the consensus that all MCL injuries are treated conservatively. The current delayed treatment algorithm for ACL-MCL injuries has several disadvantages. First, MCL healing may be incomplete, resulting in residual valgus laxity that places the ACL graft at greater risk of failure. Second, delayed treatment lengthens the overall rehabilitation period, thereby prolonging the presence of atrophy and delaying return to preinjury activity levels. Third, the initial healing period leaves the knee unstable for longer and risks further intra-articular damage. Acute simultaneous surgical treatment of both ligaments has the potential to avoid these shortcomings. This article will review the evolution of treatment of ACL-MCL injuries and explain how it shifted toward the current treatment algorithm. We will (1) discuss why the consensus shifted, (2) discuss the shortcomings of the current treatment plan, (3) discuss the potential advantages of acute simultaneous treatment, and (4) present an overview of the available literature.

Intra-articular administration of adrenaline plus an irrigation pump system for visibility during the arthroscopic reconstruction of multiple knee ligaments without a tourniquet

Objective

Multiple ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare but severe systemic trauma. Single surgery in the acute setting is preferred, although with an extended operation time. To avoid the complications associated with a tourniquet, we herein describe a method for visibility without a tourniquet: intra-articular administration of adrenaline plus an irrigation pump system.

Study design

This is a cohort study with a level of evidence of 3.

Methods

From April 2020 to February 2022, 19 patients with MLKIs were reviewed retrospectively. All patients got intra-articular administration of adrenaline plus an irrigation pump system for visibility without a tourniquet. The following parameters were assessed: visibility, range of motion, knee stability, visual analog scale (VAS) score, range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC).

Results

All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. At the latest follow-up, the mean VAS score, ROM, Lysholm score, and IKDC were 1.79 ± 0.86, 121.21 ± 10.96, 88.16 ± 5.21, and 88.53 ± 5.06, respectively. The average Tegner activity level decreased significantly from preinjury to postoperation (5.16 ± 0.83 vs. 3.11 ± 0.88, P &lt; 0.001). Of the 19 patients, 17 (89.47%) had good knee function, while only two patients (10.53%) had asymptomatic knees with positive Lachman tests. A total of 17 patients (89.47%) had good or excellent visualization during arthroscopy. Of the 19 patients, three (15.79%) required an increased fluid pressure to achieve a clear operative view. Two patients converted to tourniquet inflation due to persistent intra-articular bleeding after using shavers.

Conclusions

The intra-articular administration of adrenaline plus an irrigation pump system is recommended as an alternative to a tourniquet to achieve a good visual field. Further evidence-based work with a larger sample is needed.

Early and Delayed Surgery for Isolated ACL and Multiligamentous Knee Injuries Have Equivalent Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early surgery for acute ligamentous injuries has recently shown good clinical and functional outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the advantages of early vs delayed surgery in patients undergoing isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or multiligament-injured knee (MLIK) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analyses of Level 1, 2, and 3 studies; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for studies reporting outcomes of timing of surgery after isolated ACL injury or in the MLIK setting using accelerated rehabilitation protocols. Two analyses were conducted to differentiate early and delayed treatment (3- and 6-week cutoffs). Collected outcomes included meniscal or chondral lesions, failure and reoperation rates, range of motion (ROM) deficits, other complications, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes. Outcomes were reported in risk ratios (RR) or mean differences with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

For timing of isolated ACL surgery, 16 studies were included with 2093 patients. High-grade evidence indicated that there were no differences in meniscal or chondral lesions, failure and reoperation rates, stiffness, ROM deficits, complications, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes between patients treated early and late (all P > .05). When including only studies that set no preoperative criteria for early surgery, the findings were similar. Regarding MLIK surgery, 14 studies were included with 1172 patients. Low evidence was noted for the following: patients treated early had significantly fewer meniscal injuries (RR, 0.7; P = .04) and chondral injuries (RR, 0.5; P < .001), while no differences were found in reoperation rates, complications, stiffness, ROM deficits, muscle strength, instrumented laxity, and functional outcomes between the groups. Other than higher Lysholm scores in the early group for the 3-week analysis (mean difference, 6.8; P = .01), there were no differences between cutoff analyses.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review with meta-analysis found no differences in clinical and functional outcomes between early and delayed surgery for isolated ACL injuries. For MLIK injuries, there were also no differences in surgical outcomes between early and delayed surgery.

Diagnosis and treatment strategies of the multiligament injured knee: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map the current literature evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published literature comprising studies reporting on at least one aspect in the diagnosis or treatment of MLKI in adults. Data were synthesised to form a descriptive analysis and thematic summary.

RESULTS

Overall, 417 studies were included. There was a substantial chronological increase in the number of studies published per year, with 70% published in the last 12 years. Of included studies, 128 (31%) were narrative reviews, editorials or technical notes with no original data. The majority of studies (n=239, 57%) originated from the USA; only 4 studies (1%) were of level I evidence. Consistent themes of contention included clinical assessment, imaging, operative strategy, timing of surgery and rehabilitation. There was a lack of gender and ethnic diversity reported within patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains insufficient high-level evidence to support definitive management strategies for MLKI. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting in current MLKI literature, precluding robust comparison, interpretation and pooling of data. Further research priorities include the development of expert consensus relating to the investigation, surgical management and rehabilitation of MLKI. There is a need for minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating MLKI.

Comparative Success of Repair Versus Reconstruction for Knee Extra-articular Ligament Injuries

Background

Surgical techniques and associated outcomes in treating acute and chronic extra-articular ligament knee injuries are in evolution, and there is question as to whether repair or reconstruction is optimal.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent surgery rate between surgical repair versus reconstruction for all extra-articular ligament injuries of the knee utilizing a large database. Our hypothesis was that overall surgical repair of both lateral and medial extra-articular knee injuries would have a higher revision rate than those treated by reconstruction.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The PearlDiver Mariner data set (2010-2019), with 122 million patients, was utilized to generate 2 patient cohorts: those who underwent surgical repair and those who underwent surgical reconstruction of a knee extra-articular ligament injury. All patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Rates of concomitant or subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction and rates of secondary procedures were assessed and compared between the 2 cohorts.

Results

In total, 3563 patients were identified: extra-articular ligament reconstruction was performed for 2405 (67.5%), and repair was performed for 1158 (32.5%). Cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed for 986 (27.7%), of which 888 of 986 (90.1%) were performed on the same day as their extra-articular ligament procedure. At 2-year follow-up, the reconstruction cohort had higher rates of revision surgery compared with the repair cohort (8.2% vs 2.5%; P < .001).

Conclusion

Using a large national database, knee extra-articular ligamentous reconstructions (those on both the lateral and the medial side) had a 3.3 times higher rate of revision surgery compared with repair at 2-year follow-up. Further study is needed to investigate the causes leading to revision surgery and to determine the optimal surgical treatment for both medial and lateral extra-articular knee ligament injuries.

Treatment of Knee Dislocation With Primary Repair and Suture Augmentation: A Viable Solution

Background:

Different surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of knee dislocation (KD). Nonoperative approaches are frequently combined with surgical reconstruction using auto- or allograft.

Purpose:

To evaluate the midterm results of primary surgical repair and suture augmentation to treat KD.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 22 patients (5 women, 17 men; mean age, 45 ± 15 years) with KD were evaluated at a mean of 49 ± 16 months after surgical treatment that included primary repair and suture augmentation. Magnetic resonance imaging, stress radiographs, and outcome scores were obtained at the follow-up. Clinical examination including hop tests and force measurements for flexion and extension was performed.

Results:

The mean difference in pre- to postinjury Tegner scores was –2 ± 1. The outcome scores showed mean values of 84 ± 15 (Lysholm), 73 ± 15 (International Knee Documentation Committee) and 65 ± 25 (Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury scale). Compared with the uninjured knee, the range of motion of the injured knee was reduced by 21° ± 12°. Twelve patients felt fit enough to perform hop tests and showed a mean deficit of 7% ± 17%° compared with the uninjured leg. The mean force deficit was 19% ± 18% for extension and 8% ± 16% for flexion. Stress radiographs revealed an 11 ± 7–mm higher anteroposterior translation on the injured side. Four patients had secondary ligament reconstructions due to persistent instability and 7 underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis due to stiffness. A significant increase of osteoarthritis was found for the medial, lateral, and patellofemoral compartments (P = .007, .004, and .006, respectively).

Conclusion:

Primary repair and suture augmentation of KD led to satisfactory clinical midterm results despite persistent radiological instability and a significant increase in osteoarthritis. This technique allows the return to activities of daily living without subjective instability in most nonathletic patients. Secondary ligament reconstructions should be performed if relevant instability persists to decrease the risk of secondary meniscal and cartilage damage.

High return to play rate following treatment of multiple-ligament knee injuries in 136 elite athletes

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to assess return to play rate and timing of elite athletes treated for multi-ligament knee injuries with modern surgical techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all professional or national/international level athletes treated for a multi-ligament knee injury by the senior author in the period from February 2001 to October 2019, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 136 elite athletes who underwent surgery of two or more knee ligaments. Outcomes measures were return to play (RTP), defined as return to elite level sport, return to play time, and further surgical procedures.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty (88.2%) athletes returned to elite level sport at an average of 12.8 months from operation. In unicruciate injuries, ACL and PCL-based injuries had similar return to play rates (89.1% vs. 87.5% respectfully, n.s.) although mean RTP time was longer in those with PCL-based injuries (15.2 vs. 11.9 months, p < 0.01). Bicruciate injuries had longer RTP times compared to unicruciate injuries (mean RTP 16.0vs. 12.4 months, p < 0.05) but were able to return at a similar rate (83.3% vs. 88.9%, n.s.). Medial and lateral sided injuries had similar RTP rates (89.3% vs. 87.9%, n.s.) though lateral sided injuries took longer before returning to play (13.4 vs. 11.6 months, p < 0.05). Further surgery was required in 54 (39.9%) patients including 25 (18.4%) manipulations under anaesthesia. Four (2.9%) of the athletes underwent revision ligament surgery.

CONCLUSION

Modern surgical techniques used in the treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries can lead to high return to play rates in elite athletes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Functional Outcomes of Delayed Surgical Reconstruction in Nonsport-Induced Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are among the most detrimental injuries, which can cause significant compromise of joint stability and function. Our aim was to investigate the functional outcomes of nonsport-induced MLKIs who presented late after injury and underwent delayed arthroscopic reconstruction. In a retrospective cohort of 18 MLKI patients (19 knees, January 2012-2018) who had undergone arthroscopic reconstruction, we assessed the knee range of motion, return to work/sport, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. The preoperative scores were retrieved from the patients' registry database. We reviewed their surgical notes and extracted the operation data, including the damaged ligaments, stages of the surgery, and associated meniscal injury. There were 14 males and 4 females with a mean age of 30.57 ± 10.31 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 17.31 ± 11.98 months. The most common injury was anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament (31.6%). The mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accidents (72.2%), falls (22.2%), and sports (5.6%). The reconstruction was either single (61.2%) or multiple stage (38.8%). The pre- and postoperative scores were 45.31 ± 7.30 versus 79.16 ± 11.86 IKDC, 3.84 ± 1.26 versus 8.37 ± 1.16 Tegner, and 60.42 ± 7.68 versus 89.42 ± 8.81 Lysholm, respectively. All the scores showed significant improvement at mean follow-up of 24.05 ± 9.55 months (p < 0.001). In conclusion, delayed arthroscopic reconstruction of MLKIs significantly improved the functional outcomes and return to work in patients presenting late to the orthopaedic clinic. There was no relationship between the demographic variables, mechanism of injury, number of injured ligaments, and the stages of surgery and the functional outcomes in this group of patients.

Long-term functional outcomes of multiligament knee reconstructions with lateral injuries

INTRODUCTION

Multiligament knee injuries are a rare but serious injury, affecting functional prognosis. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term clinical and laximetric outcomes of acute or chronic multiligament knee reconstructions, with lateral impairment, using autografts.

HYPOTHESIS

Autograft reconstructions give good long-term clinical and laximetric results.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective monocentric consecutive study was conducted in patients who had multiligament knee reconstructions. The criteria for inclusions were cruciate ligament lesions associated with lateral injuries, reconstructed using autografts, regardless of the time to surgery. A minimum follow-up of 5-years was required. Twenty-nine patients were analysed. The average age at surgery was 30.2±13 years. The patients were clinically reviewed at the last follow-up. Differential residual laxity was objectively assessed with comparative dynamic X-rays. Functional IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS scores were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 7.5±1.7 years. The lesions were divided into 12 KD-I, 16 KD-IIIL and 1 KD-IV, including 16 acute lesions (time to surgery <30-day) and 13 chronic lesions. At the last follow-up, the objective IKDC identified: 3 stage A, 15 stage B and 11 stage C. The average scores were: subjective IKDC 70.1±16, Lysholm 76.8±14 and KOOS: pain 71.6±20, symptoms 83.6±22, activity 90.6±20, sport 58.8±23, quality of life 60.0±30. Dynamic X-rays showed an average differential laxity of 2.8±2.6mm anteriorly, 5.0±2.2mm posteriorly, and 2.0±2.5mm in varus. Four cases required surgery: 3 arthrolysis procedures for stiffness and 1 joint lavage for sepsis.

DISCUSSION

With an average follow-up of 7.5 years, multiligament knee reconstructions using autografts with lateral involvement provide good long-term control of frontal and sagittal laxities. A comparison with allograft reconstructions is necessary to be able to potentially overcome the morbidity associated to donor sites.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; monocentric retrospective descriptive study.

Review of Extensor Mechanism Injuries in the Dislocated Knee

Knee dislocations, aka multiligamentous injuries, are uncommon but devastating injuries often following high-energy trauma. Tears of the major knee stabilizers are well documented; however, injuries of the knee extensor mechanism are less commonly reported. The extensor mechanism is comprised of the patella, patellar tendon, and quadriceps tendons. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging modality of internal derangements of the knee due to its excellent soft tissue contrast. In this article, we will discuss the normal imaging findings of the extensor mechanism and review abnormalities following knee dislocation.

Cartilage and Meniscus Injuries Are More Common in Patients Undergoing Delayed Multiligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of meniscus and cartilage pathology in multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) and determine the relationship between surgical timing and injury mechanism with degree of intra-articular injury. Patients with surgically treated MLKIs over a 15-year period were retrospectively reviewed and grouped based on surgical intervention, time to intervention, and injury mechanism. The presence or absence of meniscus and chondral injury were recorded at the time of surgery. Surgical intervention within 6 weeks of injury was deemed acute, while surgery occurring more than 6 weeks from injury was classified as delayed. Over the 15-year study period, 207 patients with MLKIs were identified. Compared with acutely managed patients, the delayed intervention group had significantly more meniscus (p = 0.03) and cartilage (p < 0.01) pathology. Meniscus injury rates in MLKIs sustained during sporting activity did not differ from nonsporting injuries (p = 0.63). However, the nonsporting group had significantly more chondral injuries (p < 0.01). High-energy injury mechanism was associated with increased cartilage (p = 0.02), but not meniscus (p = 0.61) injury rates. In conclusion, surgical reconstruction of MLKIs delayed for more than 6 weeks was associated with increased meniscus and cartilage pathology.

Acute Versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background:

The optimal timing of surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries remains controversial.

Purpose:

To review the clinical and functional outcomes after acute and delayed surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We performed a search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2020. Eligible studies reported on knee dislocations, multiligament knee injuries, or bicruciate ligament injuries in adult patients (age, ≥18 years). In addition to comparing outcomes between acute and delayed surgical intervention groups, we conducted 3 subgroup analyses for outcomes within isolated knee injuries, knee injuries with concomitant polytrauma/fractures, and high-level (level 2) studies.

Results:

Included in the analysis were 31 studies, designated as evidence level 2 (n = 3), level 3 (n = 8), and level 4 (n = 20). These studies reported on 2594 multiligament knee injuries sustained by 2585 patients (mean age, 25.1-65.3 years; mean follow-up, 12-157.2 months). At the latest follow-up timepoint, the mean Lysholm (n = 375), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (n = 286), and Tegner (n = 129) scores for the acute surgical intervention group were 73.60, 67.61, and 5.06, respectively. For the delayed surgical intervention group, the mean Lysholm (n = 196), IKDC (n = 172), and Tegner (n = 74) scores were 85.23, 72.32, and 4.85, respectively. The mean Lysholm (n = 323), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 143) scores for our isolated subgroup were 83.7, 74.8, and 5.0, respectively. By comparison, the mean Lysholm (n = 270), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 206) scores for the polytrauma/fractures subgroup were 83.3, 64.5, and 5.0, respectively.

Conclusion:

The results of our systematic review did not elucidate whether acute or delayed surgical intervention produced superior clinical and functional outcomes. Although previous evidence has supported acute surgical intervention, future prospective randomized controlled trials and matched cohort studies must be completed to confirm these findings.

Incidence of Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications After Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction or Repair: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

BACKGROUND

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee are being increasingly recognized and treated in current orthopaedic practice. While there are numerous systematic reviews evaluating the management and outcomes after PLC injuries, there are limited data investigating complications after PLC reconstruction or repair.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature to determine the incidence of postoperative complications after the surgical treatment of PLC injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (2008-2019), Embase (2008-2019), and MEDLINE (2008-2019) were queried for literature reporting on PLC reconstruction or repair, with or without concomitant ligamentous or meniscal surgery. Data including type of surgery performed, concomitant procedures, and follow-up time were extracted. Complications recorded included intra- and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

After the intra- and postoperative complication data of 60 studies (1747 cases) were combined, surgical management of PLC injuries was associated with an intraoperative complication rate of 0.34% (range, 0%-2.8%) and a postoperative complication rate of 20% (range, 0%-51.2%). The most common postoperative complication was arthrofibrosis (range, 0%-20%). The overall infection rate was 1.3% (range, 0%-10%). Four cases of postoperative common peroneal nerve palsy were reported. Failure of reconstruction or repair was reported in 164 (9.4%) of all cases examined (range, 0%-37.1%).

CONCLUSION

Although the intraoperative rate of complications during PLC reconstructions is low, postoperative complications rates of 20% can be expected, including arthrofibrosis, infection, and neurovascular injury. PLC structures repaired or reconstructed failed in 9.4% of the cases.

Incidence of Associated Lesions of Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

The incidence of concomitant injuries, including meniscal and cartilage injuries, has not been adequately reported in previous studies on multiligament knee injury (MLKI) because their primary focal points have been the degree of ligament injury, treatment strategy, involvement of other soft tissues, and neurovascular injury.

Purpose:

To analyze the incidence of associated lesions in MLKIs, including medial and lateral meniscal injuries, cartilage lesions, and complications.

Study Design:

Systemic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched between inception and April 30, 2020. Studies were included if they reported the incidence rates of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears and cartilage injuries in cases of MLKIs. For the meta-analysis, data were extracted on clinical outcomes measured according to the number of medial and/or lateral meniscal tears, cartilage injuries, and complications.

Results:

A total of 45 studies were included in the MLKI analysis (3391 patients). The pooled rate of medial meniscal tears was 30.4% (95% CI, 24.1%-37.1%; P < .0001; I² = 85.8%). The pooled rate of lateral meniscal tears was 27.5% (95% CI, 20.3%-35.3%; P < .0001; I² = 89.6%). The pooled rate of cartilage injuries was 27.5% (95% CI, 22.1%-33.3%; P < .0001; I² = 86.8%). The pooled rates of peroneal nerve injuries, vascular injuries, and arthrofibrosis were 19.2% (95% CI, 14.2%-24.7%; P < .001; I² = 81.3%), 18.4% (95% CI, 13.2%-24.3%; P < .0001; I² = 81.0%), and 11.2% (95% CI, 8.1%-14.7%; P = .0018; I² = 54.0%), respectively.

Conclusion:

The pooled rates of meniscal tears and cartilage injuries concomitant with MLKIs were high, ranging from 27% to 30%, and the pooled rates of peroneal nerve injury, vascular injury, and arthrofibrosis were considerable, ranging from 11% to 19%. The influence of these associated lesions on clinical results should be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Postoperative Rehabilitation of Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare, and heterogeneous in presentation and treatment options. Consequently, optimal postoperative rehabilitation of MLKI remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the latest evidence for postoperative rehabilitation protocols following multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multidatabase search was conducted with the aid of a health sciences librarian. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screenings of studies evaluating postoperative rehabilitation protocols following MLKR. All included studies were then graded based on level of evidence, and data concerning patient demographics and rehabilitation protocols were extracted.

RESULTS

MLKR rehabilitation protocols differ widely in terms of weightbearing, bracing, initiation, and types of physical therapy, yet several established protocols were referenced frequently throughout the literature. Such protocols resulted in good outcomes, with patients returning to running in 6 to 12 months and returning to sport in 8 to 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The rare nature of MLKI hinders the ability to create a standardized rehabilitation protocol. However, early postoperative physical therapy and range of motion consistently lead to improved outcomes. Randomized studies are needed to determine optimal postoperative rehabilitation following MLKR.

Diagnosis and Management of Articular Cartilage and Meniscus Pathology in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries commonly occur in association with participation in sporting or recreational activities or due to a direct trauma. Cartilage and meniscal lesions are prevalent in PCL-injured knees with increasing likelihood and severity based on extent and duration of trauma to the knee. As such, comprehensive diagnostics should be performed to ascertain all related pathology, and patients should be thoroughly educated regarding treatment options, likely sequelae including posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and associated outcomes. Treatments should address the joint as an organ, ensuring stability, alignment, and functional tissue restoration are optimized by the most efficient and effective means possible. Compliance with patient- and procedure-specific postoperative management protocols is critical for optimizing successful outcomes for these complex cases. The objectives of this review article are to highlight the likelihood and importance of osteochondral and meniscal pathology in the PCL-injured knee, and to provide the best current evidence regarding comprehensive evaluation and management for PCL-injured knees with cartilage and/or meniscal comorbidities.

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Operative Treatment of Multiligament Knee Injury

Background:

Many factors can affect clinical outcomes and complications after a complex multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Certain aspects of the treatment algorithm for MLKI, such as the timing of surgery, remain controversial.

Purpose:

To determine the risk factors for common complications after MLKI reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on 134 patients with MLKI who underwent reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients included in the review had a planned surgical reconstruction of >1 ligament based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Complications were categorized as (1) wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement, (2) arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions, (3) deep venous thrombosis, (4) need for removal of hardware, and (5) revision ligament surgery. The potential risk factors for complications included patient characteristics, injury pattern categorized according to Schenck classification (knee dislocation [KD] I–KD IV), and timing of surgery. Significant risk factors for complications were analyzed by t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test.

Results:

A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; of these, 29.6% experienced at least 1 complication. Smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.28-8.02]; P = .01) and planned staged surgery (OR, 2.71 [95% CI, 1.04-7.04]; P = .04) significantly increased the overall risk of complication, while increased time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.998]; P < .01) significantly decreased the risk. Increasing time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-0.998]; P = .02) also led to a slightly but significantly decreased risk for arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion:

The study findings suggest that smoking, decreased time from injury to initial surgery, and planned staged procedures may increase the rate of complications. Further studies are needed to determine which changes in the treatment algorithm are most effective to reduce the complication rate in patients.

A systematic review comparing the results of early vs delayed ligament surgeries in single anterior cruciate ligament and multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and incidence of concomitant injuries in patients undergoing early vs delayed surgical treatment of single anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and multiligament knee injury (MLKI).

METHODS

A literature search using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus from their inception to April 30, 2020 was conducted. Studies with levels I to IV evidence reporting the incidence of meniscus or cartilage injury according to early vs delayed surgery in single ACL injuries and MLKIs were included. In the meta-analysis, data based on the number of meniscus and cartilage injuries were extracted and pooled. Lysholm and Tegner scores were analyzed using two-sample Z-tests to calculate the non-weighted mean difference (NMD). A meta-regression analysis was also performed to determine the effect of single ACL injury and MLKI/study design.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies on single ACL injury and 14 studies on MLKI were included in this analysis. In the analysis, there were significant decreases in Lysholm score (NMD - 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 7.37 to - 3.23]) and Tegner score (NMD - 0.25 [95% CI - 0.45 to - 0.05]) and increases in risk of meniscus tear (odds ratio [OR] 1.73 [95% CI 1.1-2.73], p = 0.01) and cartilage injury (OR 2.48 [95% CI 1.46-4.2], p = 0.0007) in the delayed surgery group regardless of single ACL injury or MLKI. The result of the meta-regression analysis indicated that single ACL injury and MLKI/study design were not significant moderators of overall heterogeneity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that delayed ACL surgery significantly resulted in a higher risk of meniscus tear and cartilage injury and decreased Lysholm and Tegner scores compared to early ACL surgery. The Lysholm scores in the delayed MLKI surgery group were significantly decreased, but the risks of meniscus tear and cartilage injury in the delayed MLKI surgery group remained unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis.

Concomitant periarticular fractures predict worse patient-reported outcomes in multiligament knee injuries: a matched cohort study

AIM

There is a shortage of high-level evidence regarding periarticular fractures affect outcomes after MLKIs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether concomitant periarticular fractures with mutliligament knee injuries (MLKIs) predict worse patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) when compared to MLKIs without concomitant periarticular fractures after surgical repair and/or reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who sustained MLKIs from January 1, 2009 to June 1, 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients aged 18-65 years with grade III injuries of two or more knee ligaments and 1-year minimum follow-up were included. Patients with injuries or surgeries to either knee before their MLKIs were excluded. Radiographs and computed tomography imaging obtained at the time of injury were used to detect concomitant periarticular fractures. Patients with and without concomitant periarticular fractures were matched on a 1:2 basis, respectively. Multiple PROMs were collected, including the IKDC Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The independent t-test was used to compare PROMs between patients with and without periarticular fractures.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (10 males, 8 females) with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (range 1.1-8.6 years) were included in the final analysis, with six patients having MLKIs and concomitant periarticular fractures. Compared to patients with isolated ligamentous MLKIs (n   =  12), patients with concomitant periarticular fracture (n = 6) demonstrated significantly worse outcomes on the IKDC-SKF (54.2 ± 13.3 vs. 74.0 ± 19.6, p = 0.04) and KOOS-Sports and Recreation subscale (41.2 ± 32.4 vs. 70.8 ± 19.4, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a periarticular fracture predicted significantly worse clinical outcomes in the setting of MLKI. These findings may be useful in determining the prognosis of MLKI with concomitant periarticular fractures treated with surgical repair and/or reconstruction.

Multiligament knee injuries treated by one-stage reconstruction using allograft: Postoperative laxity assessment using stress radiography and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) leads to better outcomes but there are controversies about optimal surgical strategies. Debates remain about timing of surgery: acute, staged or delayed and about graft choice: autograft, allograft or a combination of both. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study aiming to evaluate postoperative laxity using stress radiographs and clinical outcomes after one-stage reconstructions of injured ligaments using non-irradiated, fresh-frozen allografts.

HYPOTHESIS

MLKIs treated by one-stage reconstructions using non-irradiated, fresh-frozen allograft may lead to satisfactorily postoperative laxity and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between November 2013 and July 2015, 23 patients with MLKIs underwent one-stage reconstruction using allograft. Knee injuries were defined according Schenk classification of Knee Dislocation (KD). Patients were evaluated using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative anterior, posterior, varus, and valgus laxities were assessed using stress radiographs and expressed as side-to-side differences (SSD) in millimeters.

RESULTS

Three of 23 patients were lost to follow-up. There were 6 KD-I, 12 KD-III, and 2 KD-IV lesions, 12 lateral-side and 10 medial-side lesions, and 13 acute and 7 chronic cases. Three patients had associated neurovascular injuries. Mean follow-up was at 29.4±6.1 months. Mean valgus SSD was 0.2mm±1.4mm (range, -2.1-2.2mm), mean varus SSD was 1.4mm±2.5mm (range, -1.7-6.0mm), mean posterior SSD was 7.2mm±3.9mm (range, 1.2-16.0mm), mean anterior SSD was 3.6mm±5.1mm (range, -4.8-16.8mm). Overall IKDC ratings were: 4 grade A, 3B, 7C, and 6D. Three patients complained of postoperative instability, with an IKDC rating of D. The mean subjective IKDC score was 67.2±19.6, the mean Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was 77.3±16.5, and the mean KOOS results were 78.5±16.6 for pain, 67.7±17.4 for symptoms, 86.5±14.2 for daily activities, 56±25.4 for sports, and 47.2±28.6 for quality of life. Nineteen of 20 patients returned to sport-6 to the same level. One patient underwent an arthroscopic arthrolysis due to postoperative arthrofibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using non-irradiated allografts for one-stage reconstructions of all the injured ligaments in MLKIs is effective and safe. Anteroposterior stability was difficult to restore, but patients returned to their daily activities and sometimes to their sports activity at the same preinjury level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The Effect of Irreducible Dislocation on Functional Outcomes in Knees With Multiligament Injuries: A Matched-Cohort Analysis

Background:

Most cases of bicruciate knee dislocation (KD) with associated posteromedial disruption (KD-IIIM) are reducible, but some cannot be reduced by closed reduction because of soft tissue incarceration.

Purpose:

To compare the clinical characteristics and functional outcomes of KD-IIIM injuries in patients with or without incarceration of soft tissue requiring open or arthroscopic reduction.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study of patients with KD was conducted between January 2013 and December 2017 at a single large institution. We applied a 1:2 matching ratio between patients with irreducible KD-IIIM injuries (irreducible group; n = 14) and those with reducible KD-IIIM injuries (control group; n = 28). There were 13 patients in the irreducible group and 25 in the control group who completed follow-up (≥2 years) and were included in our analysis. The efficacy of treatment in patients with KD was evaluated based on range of motion, the Tegner score, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.

Results:

At the end of follow-up, the mean Tegner score was 4.5 (range, 4-6), the mean Lysholm score was 79.2 (range, 60-95), and the mean IKDC score was 78.6 (range, 60.9-95.4) in the irreducible group. The respective results in the control group were 4.6 (range, 3-8), 83.1 (range, 39-100), and 80.6 (range, 42.5-96.6). These scores did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Similarly, mean range of motion was similar between groups (irreducible, 118.1°; control, 124.8°). In the irreducible group, the acute subgroup showed significantly higher Lysholm and IKDC scores than the chronic subgroup, while the acute and chronic subgroups in the control group showed no significant differences in these respective outcome scores.

Conclusion:

In the present study, the treatment of irreducible KD led to similar functional outcomes compared with reducible KD. However, the treatment of chronic irreducible KD led to worse outcomes compared with acute irreducible KD, and therefore, urgent reduction is recommended in these patients.

Combined ACL-PCL-Medial and Lateral Side Injuries (Global Laxity)

The multiple ligament injured knee is a complex problem in orthopedic surgery. These injuries may or may not present as acute knee dislocations, and careful assessment of the extremity vascular and neurological status is essential because of the possibility of arterial and/or venous compromise, and nerve injury. These complex injuries require a systematic approach to evaluation and treatment. Physical examination and imaging studies enable the surgeon to make a correct diagnosis and formulate a treatment plan. Knee stability is improved postoperatively when evaluated with knee ligament rating scales, arthrometer testing, and stress radiographic analysis. Surgical timing depends upon the injured ligaments, vascular status of the extremity, reduction stability, and the overall health of the patient. The use of allograft tissue is preferred because of the strength of these large grafts, and the absence of donor site morbidity.

Time-sensitive ambulatory orthopaedic soft-tissue surgery paradigms during the COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose

Timing of surgery for orthopaedic injuries continues to evolve, as an improved understanding of biology, healing, and technological advances continues to challenge historical norms. With the growing COVID-19 pandemic stretching limited healthcare resources, postponing surgery becomes an inevitable and unenviable task for most orthopaedic surgeons, and a shift in outpatient paradigms is required to mitigate poor outcomes in patients.

Methods

A scoping review of five databases on surgical timing and orthopaedic soft-tissue injuries was performed. All randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort studies, retrospective case series, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions were included for review, with 65 studies meeting the inclusion criteria.

Results

Better outcomes appear to be associated with early surgery for subluxations (< 1 week), recurrent dislocations (> 2 episodes), ligamentous and tendinous injuries (< 2 weeks), and bony avulsion injuries (< 3 weeks). Spinal conditions with neurological compromise should be operated on within 24 hours and spinal instability within 72 hours to reduce the risk of complications and poor outcomes.

Conclusion

Most soft-tissue orthopaedic injuries can be managed with outpatient ambulatory surgery in a semi-elective setting. As the paradigm for outpatient surgery shifts due to technological advances and the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical for surgeons to time their surgery appropriately to maintain the high standards of orthopaedic practice.

Critical Evaluation of the Methodologic Quality of the Top 50 Cited Articles Relating to Knee Dislocation and Multiligamentous Knee Injury

Background:

Many studies have evaluated the management of knee dislocations (KDs) and multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs). However, no study to date has analyzed the quality of the most cited articles in this literature.

Hypothesis:

There is a positive correlation between the number of article citations in the KD and MLKI literature and their methodologic quality.

Study Design:

Systematic review.

Methods:

The Web of Science online database was searched to identify the top 50 cited articles in KD and MLKI care. Demographic data were recorded for each study. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS) and the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) were used to analyze the methodological quality of each article. Spearman correlation coefficients (r_s) were then calculated.

Results:

The articles identified were published between 1958 and 2015 in a wide variety of peer-reviewed journals (n = 16). The majority of study level of evidence (LOE) was of low quality (level 5, 16%; level 4, 54%; level 3, 16%; level 2, 14%). There were no studies of level 1 evidence. The mean MCMS and MINORS scores were 29.0 (SD, 19.1; range, 3-72) and 6.1 (SD, 3.7; range, 0-14), respectively. No significant correlation was identified between the number of citations and the publication year, LOE, MCMS, or MINORS (r_s = 0.123 [P = .396]; r_s = 0.125 [P = .389]; r_s = 0.182 [P = .204]; and r_s = 0.175 [P = .224], respectively). Positive correlations were observed between improved MCMS and MINORS scores and more recent year of publication (r_s = 0.43 [P = .002]; r_s = 0.32 [P = .022]) as well as improved study LOE (r_s = 0.65 [P < .001]; r_s = 0.67 [P < .001]).

Conclusion:

The top 50 cited articles on KD and MLKI care consisted of low LOE and methodological quality, with no existing level 1 articles. There was no significant correlation between the number of citations and publication year, LOE, or study methodological quality. Positive correlations were observed between later publication date and improved methodological quality.

Multiligamentous Knee Injuries in the Military Tactical Athlete

Multiligament knee injuries pose a significant challenge to military service members looking to return to active duty service. They represent a diverse injury pattern and recovery is often complicated by other ipsilateral extremity trauma and systemic injuries. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding the treatment of these injuries. Despite this, orthopedic surgeons are tasked with a young, active, high demand population looking to maximize their recovery after these complex injuries. We present a synthesis of the available civilian and military literature and provide an evidence-based review with considerations specific to a military population.

Major concern in the multiligament-injured knee treatment: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to address the treatment of multiligament knee injuries in three major aspects, specifically (1) surgical versus nonoperative treatment, (2) repair versus reconstruction of injured ligamentous structures, and (3) early versus late surgery of damaged ligaments.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a search on PubMed from 1966 to March 2016 using Levy's review as a starting-point, and the same terms "knee dislocation," "multiple ligament-injured knee," and "multiligament knee reconstruction." Study inclusion criteria were (1) levels I to IV evidence, (2) "multiligament" defined as disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments, (3) measures of functional and clinical outcomes, and (4) minimum of 12 months' follow-up, with a mean of at least 24 months.

RESULTS

Two high-level studies compared surgical treatment with nonoperative treatment. There was a higher Lyshom scores (85 v 67) in surgically treated patients, as well as higher excellent/good IKDC scores (69% v 64%) and return to sport (41% v 18%). There were four studies comparing repair with reconstruction of damaged structures, with similar mean Lysholm scores (84 v 84) and excellent/good IKDC scores (63% v 63%). Nevertheless, repair of the posterolateral corner had a higher failure rate (39% v 8%) and a lower return to sport activities (25% v 51%). Similarly, repair of the cruciates achieved decreased stability and range of motion. There were six studies comparing early surgery (within 3 weeks) with delayed surgery. Early treatment resulted in higher mean Lysholm scores (89 v 82) and a higher percentage of excellent/good IKDC scores (57% v 41%), as well as higher mean ROM (129° v 124°).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that the best treatment does not exist, but better functional and clinical outcomes have been achieved with reconstruction rather than repair. Surgery must be performed within the first three weeks. Delayed ACL reconstruction allows to reduce arthrofibrosis rate.

The use of allograft tissue in posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee reconstruction

PURPOSE

Currently both autograft and allograft tissues are available for reconstruction of posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee injuries. Decision-making is based on a complex interplay between anatomical structures, functional bundles and varying biomechanical requirements. Despite theoretically better biological healing and reduced risk of disease transmission autografts are associated with donor site morbidity as well as being limited by size and quantity. The use of allografts eliminates donor-site morbidity but raises cost and issues of clinical effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to review current concepts and evidence for the use of allografts in primary posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament reconstructions.

METHODS

A narrative review of the relevant literature was conducted for PCL, collateral ligament and multi-ligament knee reconstruction. Studies were identified using a targeted and systematic search with focus on recent comparative studies and all clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The rationale and principles of management underpinning the role of allograft tissue were identified and the clinical and functional outcomes were analysed. Finally, the position of postoperative physiotherapy and rehabilitation was identified.

RESULTS

The review demonstrated paucity in high quality and up-to-date results addressing the issue especially on collaterals and multi-ligament reconstructions. There was no significant evidence of superiority of a graft type over another for PCL reconstruction. Contemporary principles in the management of posterolateral corner, MCL and multi-ligament injuries support the use of allograft tissue.

CONCLUSION

The present review demonstrates equivalent clinical results with the use of autografts or allografts. It remains, however, difficult to generate a conclusive evidence-based approach due to the paucity of high-level research. When confronted by the need for combined reconstructions with multiple grafts, preservation of synergistic muscles, and adapted postoperative rehabilitation; the current evidence does offer support for the use of allograft tissue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Factors predictive of poorer outcomes in the surgical repair of multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of injury and treatment factors on clinical/functional outcomes in multiligament knee injuries (MLKI).

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients with confirmed and surgically treated MLKI who met inclusion criteria were scheduled for a follow-up visit to obtain: SF-12 and subjective feeling of normalcy between the operated and healthy knee, and IKDC, active range of motion (ROM), and stability exam (Lachman test, posterior drawer, and dial test at 30°). A chart review was used to obtain data on injury and treatment factors.

RESULTS

The postoperative mean (SD) outcomes were: IKDC score 62.7 (25.9), flexion-extension ROM 125° (29°), and percentage of normalcy 74% (20%). The postoperative normal/nearly normal stability exam was: Lachman test 36 (95%) patients, posterior drawer at 90° 38 (97%) patients, and dial test of 39 (100%) patients. There were 24 (61.5%) and 23 (59%) patients with complications and reoperations, respectively. The presence of bicruciate injuries was associated with worse Lachman (p = 0.03) and posterior drawer tests (p = 0.03). Presence of injury to meniscal structures was associated with worse Lachman test (p = 0.03), lower percentage of normalcy (p = 0.02) and extension lag (p = 0.04). Injury to cartilage structures was associated with worse IKDC scores (p = 0.04). IKDC was lower in cases of posterolateral corner reconstruction (p = 0.03) and use of allograft tendons for reconstruction (p = 0.02); ROM was lower in allograft reconstruction (p = 0.02) and need for meniscal repair (p = 0.01). Bicruciate reconstruction led to worst posterior drawer test (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of MLKI might be negatively influenced by bicruciate ligament, meniscal, and cartilage injuries; with regards to treatment characteristics, need for posterolateral corner or bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of allografts, or need for meniscal repair may similarly diminish outcomes. While surgical treatment provides good overall function, ROM and stability, it rarely results in a "normal" knee and the chances of complications and reoperations are high.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional comparative study, Level III.

Early surgery of multiligament knee injuries may yield better results than delayed surgery: a systematic review

Importance

Multiligament knee injuries are rare, but can lead to significant functional limitations. Surgery has been shown to improve outcomes, however, there remains considerable debate regarding the optimal timing of surgery.

Objective

We aimed to determine whether early surgery in the setting of a multiligamentous knee injury was associated with superior functional outcomes when compared with surgery on a delayed basis.

Evidence review

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases was conducted up to March 2018. We identified studies with a sample size greater than 10 that included subjects with an injury to at least two of the four major knee ligaments and compared outcomes between early and delayed surgery. We assessed the methodological quality of each included study using the Newstead-Ottawa Scale.

Findings

We identified 11 eligible studies, including a total of 320 patients (195 early and 125 delayed). The mean time to surgery among patients treated early was 11.2 days in comparison to 294.8 days for the delayed group. Early surgery was found to have a statistically significantly higher Lysholm score (p<0.0001) and Meyers rating (p=0.02) when compared with delayed surgery. No statistically significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Scale, total arc of motion, loss of extension or loss of flexion were demonstrated between early and delayed surgery. Early surgery was noted to have a statistically significantly higher odds of requiring a manipulation under anaesthesia or arthrolysis (p=0.04), however, subsequent subgroup analysis showed no difference between early and delayed surgery when only studies employing an early range of motion protocol were pooled.

Conclusions and relevance

Based on the current body of literature, which primarily consists of level IV evidence, early surgery in the setting of multiligament knee injury may provide better functional outcomes without compromising range of motion when using early postoperative mobilisation protocols. Further studies of higher quality are required to corroborate these findings.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review.

Comparison of KD3-M and KD3-L Multiligamentous Knee Injuries and Analysis of Predictive Factors That Influence the Outcomes of Single-Stage Reconstruction in KD3 Injuries

Background:

The knee dislocation–3 (KD3) injury pattern is the most common form of multiligamentous injury. Medial KD3 (KD3-M) and lateral KD3 (KD3-L) are 2 anatomically different varieties of this injury.

Purpose:

To compare the surgical outcomes of KD3-M and KD3-L multiligamentous knee injury patterns and to determine the factors that could influence the outcomes after single-stage reconstruction.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A cohort of 45 patients with multiligamentous knee injuries (31 KD3-M, 14 KD3-L) who were operated on between 2011 and 2015 were compared. The cruciate ligaments were reconstructed, and the collateral ligaments were managed either conservatively or surgically depending on intraoperative laxity, tissue condition, injury site, and chronicity. The mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-72 months). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), and laxity on stress radiographs were compared. Various factors likely to influence the outcomes were also analyzed.

Results:

The mean IKDC score, Lysholm score, and knee flexion ROM for the 45 patients were 74.74, 87.66, and 126.78°, respectively. There was no significant difference between the KD3-M and KD3-L groups in terms of the postoperative IKDC score (P = .768), Lysholm score (P = .689), knee flexion ROM (P = .798), and laxity on stress radiographs (P = .011). Patients with a transient dislocation had better outcomes (76.51, 89.41, and 128.61°, respectively) than those with a frank dislocation (67.62, 80.66, and 119.44°) (P = .037, .007, and .043). The acute group had better outcomes (77.00, 89.51, and 127.86°) when compared with the subacute (66.26, 86.00, and 121.00°) and chronic groups (67.40, 76.40, and 125.00°) (P = .045, .006, and .486). Regression analysis showed the influence of these factors on outcomes. The presence or absence of dislocations, time frame in which surgery was performed, and follow-up duration were found to influence the outcome. All other factors had no bearing on outcomes. Two patients had knee stiffness and underwent arthrolysis.

Conclusion:

Despite anatomic and biomechanical differences between KD3-M and KD3-L injuries, single-stage management did not produce any significant difference in results. The presence of a frank dislocation, delay in surgery, and duration of follow-up were found to influence outcomes.

Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

Multiligament knee injuries have a strong association with periarticular soft-tissue and neurovascular injuries, which must not be overlooked in the initial evaluation of the patient. Even though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is imperative for a complete evaluation of the damaged ligamentous knee restraints, stress radiography aids in establishing the functional consequence of the MRI findings and may assist in directing reconstruction. Although cruciate ligament tears are generally reconstructed, a combined repair-reconstruction approach is most useful for collateral ligaments and extra-articular structures, with incorporation of local tissue into the reconstruction whenever possible. Regardless of the timing and operative technique chosen, patients with multiligament knee injuries are at high risk for complications and long-term disability.

Bilateral Multiligamentous Knee Injuries: A Case Report and Technique Review

Bilateral knee dislocations are rare musculoskeletal injuries. We report a case of a patient who sustained traumatic bilateral knee dislocations resulting in multiligamentous injuries to both knees. The patient subsequently underwent acute ligamentous reconstructions of both knees performed at 2 weeks and 3 weeks after the initial injury. One year after these procedures, the patient has achieved excellent functional outcomes and has returned to recreational sports.

Return to Work or Sport After Multiligament Knee Injury: A Systematic Review of 21 Studies and 524 Patients

PURPOSE

To systematically review multiligament knee injury (MLKI) outcome studies to determine overall rates of return to work or sport after MLKI and risk factors for lack of return to work or sport after MLKI.

METHODS

A search was performed of MLKI outcome studies from 1950 to March 1, 2017. Ninety-two studies were identified. All included reported return to work, return to sport, or Tegner activity scores. Rates of return to work or sport were determined for overall population and by obesity status, injury severity, and presence of peroneal nerve or vascular injury.

RESULTS

A total of 524 patients (21 studies) were included. Return to high-level sport was low (22%-33%). Return to any level of sport was 53.6% overall (178/332), with a higher rate reported in studies with all surgical patients (59.1%, 114/193 patients) versus studies with mixed surgical and nonoperative treatment (46.0%, 64/139 patients) (P = .02). Rate of return to work with little or no modifications was 62.1% (146/200) and return to any work was 88.4% (190/215). Obese patients had lower postoperative Tegner scores than a general population (obese: mean 1.7 ± 1.2; nonobese: mean 4.5 ± 1.0; P < .001). Among studies without Schenck grade IV and V injuries, return to work with no or minimal modifications (100%, 12/12 patients) was higher than studies including grade IV and V patients (66.0%, 70/106 patients) (P = .017). Return to any work was higher in studies without vascular injuries (96.3%, 105/109) versus those including them (80.2%, 85/106) (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Return to sport after MLKI occurs in approximately 60% of surgically treated patients, though return to high-level sport is lower. Return to work is frequently possible after MLKI though it may require workplace or job duty modifications. Obesity, nonoperative treatment, higher injury severity, and vascular injury are associated with poorer functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Complex knee injuries treated in acute phase: Long-term results using Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System artificial ligament

AIM

To present the long-term results of complex knee injuries, treated early using the Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System (LARS) artificial ligament to reconstruct posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

METHODS

From September 1997 to June 2010, thirty-eight complex knee injuries were treated, where early arthroscopic PCL reconstructions were undergone, using the LARS (Surgical Implants and Devices, Arc-sur-Tille, France) artificial ligament. Exclusion criteria were: Late (> 4 wk) reconstruction, open technique, isolated PCL reconstruction, knee degenerative disease, combined fracture or vascular injury and use of allograft or autograft for PCL reconstruction. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed with IKDC Subjective Knee Form, KOS-ADLS questionnaire, Lysholm scale and SF-12 Health Survey. Posterior displacement (PD) was measured with the Telos Stress Device.

RESULTS

Seven patients were excluded; two because of co-existing knee osteoarthritis and the remaining five because of failure to attend the final follow-up. The sample consisted of 31 patients with mean age at the time of reconstruction 33.2 ± 12.5 years (range 17-61). The postoperative follow-up was on average 9.27 ± 4.27 years (range 5-18). The mean average IKDC and KOS scores were 79.32 ± 17.1 and 88.1 ± 12.47% respectively. Average PD was 3.61 ± 2.15 mm compared to 0.91 ± 1.17 mm in the uninjured knees (one with grade 1 + and two with grade 2 +). Dial test was found positive in one patient, whereas the quadriceps active drawer test was positive in three patients. None was tested positive on the reverse-pivot shift test. The range of motion (ROM) was normal in thirty knees, in comparison with the contralateral one. There was no extension deficit. Osteoarthritic changes were found in three knees (9.6%).

CONCLUSION

Early treatment of complex knee injuries, using LARS artificial ligament for PCL reconstruction sufficiently reduces posterior tibia displacement and provides satisfactory long-term functional outcomes.

Management of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Injuries: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tibial-sided avulsion injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) generally require surgical intervention. No consensus exists concerning the optimal surgical treatment approach for these injuries.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review investigating the open and arthroscopic surgical treatment modalities, outcomes, and complications of PCL tibial-sided bony avulsions.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing PubMed and EMBASE from 1975 to present outlining open versus arthroscopic surgical repair of PCL bony avulsion injuries and comparing subjective and objective postoperative patient-reported outcomes, including Tegner, IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), and Lysholm scoring systems, as well as rates of patient complications. The quest was performed in June 2016, and searched terms included posterior cruciate ligament, PCL, bony, avulsion(s), tibial-sided, open, and arthroscopic. Inclusion criteria included English-language studies involving surgical fixation strategies for PCL tibial-sided bony avulsions. Exclusion criteria included non-English language, case studies/case series, and subject matter not pertaining to PCL bony avulsions.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles comprising 637 patients met the criteria and were included in the final review. PCL injuries with a tibial-sided avulsion were the result of motor vehicle accidents in 68.4% of patients, with 59.0% of these injuries resulting from motorcycle accidents. The arthroscopic group had better IKDC grade A scores (78.9%), indicating a normal knee postoperatively, as compared with the open group (65.9%). The postoperative Lysholm scores were similar between the groups, with a mean of 95.0 in the arthroscopic group and 92.8 in the open group. The arthroscopic group also reported 100% return to preinjury level of activity, compared with 86.2% in the open group. The most common complication in both groups was arthrofibrosis, which was reported more often in the arthroscopic group (0%-35%) versus the open treatment group (0%-25%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with displaced tibial-sided PCL avulsion fractures treated operatively, surgical approaches render similar outcomes and risks. While the arthroscopic group had somewhat higher subjective and objective knee outcome scores, it demonstrated a slightly higher rate of arthrofibrosis. The clear advantage of the arthroscopic approach is that concomitant intra-articular injuries seen on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, such as meniscal tears or osteochondral loose fragments, can be addressed at the time of the index operation.

Surgical management of posterior knee dislocation associated with extensor apparatus rupture

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and functional results of patients who underwent surgical management for posterior knee dislocation associated with extensor apparatus rupture.

INTRODUCTION

Posterior knee dislocations associated with extensor apparatus ruptures are defined as rare but complicated injuries, which are difficult to return to the level of activity prior to the injury. The study demonstrated a hypothesis that good knee stability and early gain of range of motion could be achieved with deliberate design of the treatment protocol and proper application of the instruments.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with posterior knee dislocations associated with extensor apparatus ruptures were evaluated after reduction and repair of extensor apparatus. Following that, multiple-ligament reconstruction in association with use of a lateral knee-spanning external fixator was applied for at least six weeks. Ligament reconstructions were performed using allografts. Range of motion and knee stability were both measured at each follow-up evaluation at a mean time of 36months. The assessment was made using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale.

RESULTS

The mean Lysholm scale score was 87.6 (range 73-95), with excellent in 11 cases, good in two, and fair in two. In the final evaluation, the range of motion was a mean range of 123.4° (range 100-135).

CONCLUSION

The use of a lateral knee-spanning external fixator ensured the safety of repaired vessels, knee stability after reduction, and early rehabilitation with range of motion.

Early or delayed reconstruction in multi-ligament knee injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether early or delayed surgical intervention in patients with multi-ligament injuries results in better outcomes, is of current and controversial debate.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing early versus late surgical treatment of multi-ligament knee injuries.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies in the English and German literature. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing early or delayed surgical interventions for multi-ligament knee injuries, with a minimum follow-up of two years, reporting the primary clinical outcome using a validated functional scoring system and range of motion. Exclusion criteria were patients treated with multi-trauma, head injury, non-union, lower extremity fractures, or a documented history of previous knee injuries. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot, and the risk of bias was established using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ² and I₂ statistic.

RESULTS

Eight studies (n=260 patients) were included in the analysis. 149 patients were treated early with a mean of 10.6days; 111 patients were treated late with a mean of 294days. The pooled estimate for clinical outcome demonstrated that early surgery resulted in significantly higher Lysholm scores (SMD 0.669, 95% CI: 0.379 to 0.959, p=0.0001, I₂=0%). Thirty-one per cent of all patients with early surgery had a normal or near normal knee, whereas only 15% of patients with late reconstruction reported the knee to be normal or near normal. The pooled estimates for total ROM did not demonstrate a significant difference between the groups (SMD 0.113, 95% CI: -0.271 to 0.498, p=0.564, I₂=35.57%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that early surgical intervention in multi-ligament injuries of the knee produces a significantly superior clinical outcome, compared to late reconstruction. Although an overall trend of improved total range of knee motion was also demonstrated, this was very small and unlikely to be clinically relevant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current Concepts and Controversies in Rehabilitation After Surgery for Multiple Ligament Knee Injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this manuscript is twofold: (1) to review the literature related to rehabilitation after surgery for multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI) and after isolated surgery for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), posterolateral corner (PLC), and medial side of the knee and (2) to present a hierarchy of anatomic structures needing the most protection to guide rehabilitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

MLKIs continue to be a rare but devastating injury. Recent evidence indicates that clinicians may be providing too much protection from early weight bearing and range of motion, but an accelerated approach has not been rigorously tested. Consideration of the nature and quality of surgical procedures (repair and reconstruction) can help clinicians determine the structures needing the most protection during the rehabilitation period. The biomechanical literature and prior clinical experience can aid clinicians to better structure rehabilitation after surgery for MLKI and improve clinical outcome for patients.

Return to duty following combat-related multi-ligamentous knee injury

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective cohort study characterized injury patterns, treatment practices, and identified the return to duty (RTD) rate following combat-related multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated injury characteristics and treatment methods of 46 military service members who had sustained a MLKI during combat activity. The primary clinical outcome measure was ability to return to active military duty. Secondary outcomes included subjective pain score, knee motion, knee instability, and use of ambulatory assistive device.

RESULTS

The RTD rate was 41% (19/46). High-energy mechanism, neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, traumatic knee arthrotomy, and intra-articular femur fracture (Orthopedic Trauma Association Classification (OTA) 33-B/C) were all more prevalent in subjects who were unable to return to duty (p<0.05). Acute external fixator application and poor knee range of motion (ROM) were also associated with military separation (p=0.041 and p=0.016, respectively). The most common ligament injury pattern (n=9; 20%) was combined disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), posterolateral corner (PLC), and medial collateral ligament (MCL). However, number of ligaments injured was not associated with RTD status.

CONCLUSION

MLKIs sustained in a combat setting have a high incidence of associated lower extremity injuries. Certain associated injuries, such as intra-articular femur fracture, knee arthrotomy, neurovascular injury, and compartment syndrome may be more important than the severity of the knee ligamentous injury in determining RTD outcome.

An evidence-based algorithm for the management of common peroneal nerve injury associated with traumatic knee dislocation

Traumatic knee dislocation is a complex ligamentous injury that may be associated with simultaneous vascular and neurological injury.Although orthopaedic surgeons may consider CPN exploration at the time of ligament reconstruction, there is no standardised approach to the management of this complex and debilitating complication.This review focusses on published evidence of the outcomes of common peroneal nerve (CPN) injuries associated with knee dislocation, and proposes an algorithm for the management. Cite this article: Deepak Samson, Chye Yew Ng, Dominic Power. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of common peroneal nerve injury associated with traumatic knee dislocation. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:362-367. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.160012.