Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral side retained stump technique reduces enlargement of the femoral bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Enlargement of the bone tunnel has become an unavoidable early complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, whether it is a single or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Preservation of the ACL stump in ACL reconstruction reduces enlargement of the bone tunnel. The purpose of this study was to investigate the question of whether single-bundle ACL reconstruction using the ACL femoral side retained stump technique reduces enlargement of the femoral tunnel.

METHODS

Forty patients who underwent single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL were included in this study. The patients were categorized into a Remnant preservation group (Group R) and the Non-remnant preservation group (Group N). In the Remnant preservation group, a high-flexion femoral side retained stump technique was used intraoperatively for the establishment of the femoral side bone tunnel, and in the Non-remnant preservation group, the conventional femoral positioning method was used (we used a femoral positioning drill for localization and drilling of the femoral bone tunnel), and MRI of the operated knee joints was performed at 6 months postoperatively. We measured the internal diameter of the femoral bone tunnel at 5 mm from the intra-articular outlet of the femoral bone tunnel on an MRI scan image perpendicular to the femoral bone tunnel. The size of the tunnel was compared between the intraoperative drilling of the bone tunnel and the size of the bone tunnel at 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative clinical assessment was Lysholm score.

RESULTS

After a 6-month follow-up of 40 patients, the diameter of the femoral tunnel at a distance of 5 mm from the inner opening of the femoral tunnel was 10.96 ± 0.67 mm and 10.11 ± 0.62 mm in patients of group N and group R, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).The diameter of the femoral tunnel at 6 months postoperatively in group N and group R compared to the intraoperative bone tunnel increased by 2.58 ± 0.24 mm and 1.94 ± 0.31 mm, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).The femoral tunnel enlargement rates of group N and group R were 30.94 ± 3.00% and 24.02 ± 5.10%, respectively, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ACL femoral side retained stump technique does not sacrifice the ideal location of the femoral tunnel and is able to preserve the possible benefits of the ACL stump: reduced femoral tunnel enlargement.

Decreased femur tunnel widening after augmented suspensory fixation compared to suspensory fixation for single bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction

Background

Tunnel widening after Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring graft is known to occur at follow-up. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of suspensory fixation augmentation using an interference screw on tunnel widening in single-bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Methods

48 patients who had single bundle ACL reconstruction with femoral fixed loop fixation technique in 15 knees, and, fixed loop with augmented aperture (bio screw) fixation in 33 knees were analyzed. The width of the tunnel was measured using radiographs immediate post-op and at follow-up within 1 year. Computerized Tomogram (CT) measurements of the tunnels and functional scores were also done with overall follow-up for the fixed loop group being 21.33 months (Standard Deviation (SD)11.14) and the Augmentation group 9.12 months (SD 3.83).

Results

Midpoint femur tunnel widening was reduced in the augmentation group, with measurements of 0.74 (SD 1.05) mm Antero Posterior (AP) and 1.01 (SD 1.04) mm in the Lateral view, compared to 1.54 (SD 1.48) mm AP and 1.79 (SD1.47 mm) in the Lateral for the fixed button group. The radiological widening was considerably less in the augmentation group with a p-value of 0.07. AP aperture widening in the augmentation group was 1.25(SD 1.10 mm), and 1.09(SD0.98) mm in the lateral view. The fixed button-only group measured 1.53 (SD1.30) mm in the AP, and 1.65 (SD 1.29) mm in the lateral view, both of which were not statistically significant. The follow-up Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were similar for the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel midpoint and aperture widening were reduced with the fixed loop with aperture (bio screw) augmentation technique for hamstring grafts in single bundle ACL fixation within 1 year with comparable functional scores.

Level of evidence

4.

Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to examine tunnel widening and clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using two different fixation methods: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside ACLR with suspensory cortical buttons.

METHODS

Tunnel widening was assessed using volumetric and diameter measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans directly after surgery, as well as 6 months and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed after 5 years with instrumented tibial anteroposterior translation measurement (KT-1000), single-leg hop testing, and the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the study population consisted of 21 patients, 12 of whom underwent screw fixation and 9 of whom had button fixation. 3 patients with all-inside ACLR had sustained early repeat ruptures within 6 months after surgery and had to be excluded from the further analysis. With screw fixation, the tibial tunnel volume changed significantly more over time compared to all-inside button fixation, with a larger initial increase at 6 months (from postoperative 2.9 ± 0.2 to 3.3 ± 0.2 cm3 at 6 months versus 1.7 ± 0.1 to 1.9 ± 0.2 cm3) and a greater final decrease over 2-5 years postoperatively (from 3.1 ± 0.2 to 1.9 ± 0.2 cm3 versus 1.8 ± 0.2 ± 0.1 to 1.3 ± 0.1 cm3) (P < 0.001). The femoral tunnel volume remained comparable between the two groups throughout the follow-up period, with an initial 1.6 ± 0.1 cm3 in both groups and 1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1 after 5 years in the screw and button groups, respectively (P ≥ 0.314). The maximum tibial and femoral tunnel diameters were significantly larger with screw fixation at all four time points. Tibial diameters measured 11.1 ± 0.2, 12.3 ± 0.3, 12.3 ± 0.4, and 11.2 ± 0.4 mm in the screw group versus 8.1 ± 0.3, 8.9 ± 0.3, 9.1 ± 0.4 and 8.2 ± 0.5 mm in the button group (P < 0.001). Femoral diameters measured 8.6 ± 0.2, 10.5 ± 0.4, 10.2 ± 0.3, and 8.9 ± 0.3 versus 7.3 ± 0.3, 8.4 ± 0.4, 8.4 ± 0.3, 7.5 ± 0.3, respectively (P ≤ 0.007). Four patients (33%) in the screw group exceeded a diameter of 12 mm on the tibial side after 5 years versus none in the button group (not significant, P = 0.104). Tibial anteroposterior translation measurement with KT-1000 after 5 years was 2.3 ± 2.4 mm in the screw group versus 3.2 ± 3.5 mm in the button group (not significant, P = 0.602). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the other clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnels in ACLR with screw fixation were associated with a larger increase in tunnel volume within the first 2 years and a greater decrease up to 5 years after surgery, while femoral tunnel volumes did not differ significantly. On the tibial side, the need for staged revision ACLR may be greater after biodegradable interference screw fixation if repeat ruptures occur, especially within the first 2 years after primary ACLR. Concerns may remain regarding a higher graft failure rate with all-inside ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

RCT CONSORT

NCT01755819.

Low Femoral Tunnel Widening Incidence Rate After ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Graft with Press-Fit Fixation

Background

Femoral tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction is a common phenomenon. We hypothesized that using a patellar tendon graft with a press-fit fixation technique without any fixation device reduces the incidence of femoral tunnel widening.

Methods

This study was conducted on 467 patients with ACL surgery between 2003 and 2015. Two hundred and nineteen of them had an ACL surgery with patellar tendon (PT) graft, and two hundred and forty-eight of them with hamstring tendon (HS). Exclusion criteria were history of previous ACL reconstruction of either knee, multiple ligament injury, or evidence of osteoarthritis on radiographs. The femoral tunnels were measured on the anteroposterior (ap) and lateral radiographs 6 months after the operation. Two independent orthopedic surgeons measured all radiographs twice and recorded the tunnel widenings. We hypothesized that using an implant-free press-fit technique with PT graft can reduce the femoral tunnel widening incidence rate.

Results

The mean incidence rate of the tunnel widening in the HS group was, on the AP and the lateral femoral views, 88% (n = 217) and 83% (n = 205), while in the PT group, 17% (n = 37) and 2% (n = 4), respectively. There was a significant difference both on AP and lateral radiographs (HS vs. PT: fem. AP: 89% vs. 17% p < 0.001; HS vs. PT: fem. lat: 84% vs. 2% p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The femoral tunnel widening incidence rate during an ACL reconstruction is significantly less when using PT tendon with femoral press-fit fixation than when using HT tendon with suspensory fixation method.

Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique.

METHODS

In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage.

RESULTS

Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening.

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion-which is of importance in case of revision surgery-an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm.

Human Trials on the Prevention of Tunnel Widening by the Emdogain in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an established procedure, some problems remain, such as bone tunnel widening after ACLR. In animal studies, Emdogain (EMD) prevented tunnel widening by promoting tendon-bone healing. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of EMD on the prevention of tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in humans. Methods Nineteen patients who underwent ACLR were included. Seven patients in the EMD group were administered EMDs into the femoral tunnel during ACLR, while 12 patients in the control group were not administered EMDs. After surgery, at two and four weeks and three, six, and 12 months, femoral and tibial tunnel widening were evaluated on computed tomography images. Anteroposterior laxity and clinical scores such as the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were assessed before surgery and 12 months postoperatively. Results Tunnel widening on the femoral side was significantly smaller in the EMD group than in the control group at two weeks. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months. There were no significant differences in anteroposterior laxity and clinical scores between the groups before and 12 months after surgery. Conclusion EMD administration into the bone tunnel did not prevent tunnel widening at 12 months after ACLR, although tunnel widening of the femoral tunnel was reduced by EMD administration in the early phase.

Comparison of two different types of hybrid Tibial fixations for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective comparative cohort study

Background

Previous studies have compared different kinds of fixations for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Nevertheless, there is no optimal method to date. To the best of authors’ knowledge, there is no article discussing the combination of adjustable suspensory device and interference screw for hybrid tibial fixation.

Methods

In total, 66 patients (n = 34, adjustable suspensory device and interference screw; n = 32, cortical screw and interference screw) were analyzed. Their International Knee Documentation Committee score and Tegner activity level scale were evaluated before and after a 2-year follow-up. The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score was evaluated after a 2-year follow-up. Physical exams such as range of motion, anterior knee pain (VAS > = 3) and Lachman test were assessed before and at least 12 months after surgery. To evaluate tunnel widening, anteroposterior and lateral view radiography was conducted 1 day and at least 12 months after surgery. A more than 10% change was considered tibial tunnel widening. Mann–Whitney U test, independent t test, paired t test, Fisher’s exact test and chi-squared test were used to compare the variables. Linear and logistic regression models were applied to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

No variable except gender (P = 0.006) showed significant difference with regard to demographic data. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding post-operative physical exams. Patients who used adjustable suspensory device and interference screw had lower post-operative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (adjusted β − 8.194; P = 0.017), Tegner activity level scale (adjusted β − 1.295; P = 0.001) and pre-operative degrees of knee flexion (adjusted β − 2.825; P = 0.026). Less percentage of tunnel widening in the lateral view of radiographs was seen in patients in group of adjustable suspensory device and interference screw (adjusted β − 1.733; P = 0.038). No significant difference was observed in the anteroposterior view of radiographs (adjusted β − 0.667; P = 0.26).

Conclusion

In these 66 patients, we observed less tibial tunnel widening and lower post-operative functional scores in the group of adjustable suspensory device and interference screw. Both groups displayed similar outcomes of physical exams as well as improvement after operation. The proposed method may become an alternative option. Nonetheless, the quality of our study is still limited, and thus further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and further application.

Trial registration

Joint Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (No: N201805094).

Study design

Prospective comparative cohort study; Level of evidence, II.

Effects of the Ankle Flexion Angle During Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruction on Ankle Kinematics, Laxity, and In Situ Forces of the Reconstructed Graft

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the ankle flexion angle during anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) reconstruction on ankle kinematics, laxity, and in situ force of a graft.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric ankles were evaluated using a 6-degrees of freedom robotic system to apply passive plantar flexion and dorsiflexion motions and multidirectional loads. A repeated measures experiment was designed using the intact ATFL, transected ATFL, and reconstructed ATFL. During ATFL reconstruction (ATFLR), the graft was fixed at a neutral position (ATFLR 0 degrees), 15 degrees of plantar flexion (ATFLR PF15 degrees), and 30 degrees of plantar flexion (ATFLR PF30 degrees) with a constant initial tension of 10 N. The 3-dimensional path and reconstructed graft tension were simultaneously recorded, and the in situ force of the ATFL and reconstructed grafts were calculated using the principle of superposition.

RESULTS

The in situ forces of the reconstructed grafts in ATFLR 0 degrees and ATFLR PF 15 degrees were significantly higher than those of intact ankles. The ankle kinematics and laxity produced by ATFLR PF 30 degrees were not significantly different from those of intact ankles. The in situ force on the ATFL was 19.0 N at 30 degrees of plantar flexion. In situ forces of 41.0, 33.7, and 21.9 N were observed at 30 degrees of plantar flexion in ATFLR 0, 15, and 30 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ATFL reconstruction with the peroneus longus (PL) tendon was performed with the graft at 30 degrees of plantar flexion resulted in ankle kinematics, laxity, and in situ forces similar to those of intact ankles. ATFL reconstructions performed with the graft fixed at 0 and 15 degrees of the plantar flexion resulted in higher in situ forces on the reconstructed graft.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Fixing the ATFL tendon graft at 30 degrees of plantar flexion results in an in situ force closest to that of an intact ankle and avoids the excessive tension on the reconstructed graft.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Asian Patients with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Gracilis Tendon Grafts: A Matched-Control Comparison

For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient patients, using a single bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft for the double-bundle concept is one of the suitable approaches for acquiring better stability and reducing bone tunnel enlargement compared with the use of hamstring grafts. At least 10-mm width of BPTB autograft is needed to achieve this concept; however, it is larger than one-third of the patellar tendon width for small or middle physique patients. This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of BPTB and gracilis (G) composite autografts for primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction in Asian athletes. Thirty-two Asian patients undergoing double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 7.0 to 7.5 mm of BPTB and 5.0 to 5.5 mm of G composite grafts were compared with 43 double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft cases. The BPTB graft was used for the anteromedial bundle (AMB), with the G graft for the posterolateral bundle (PLB). Percentage of femoral bone tunnel enlargement compared with the original size was determined by computed digital radiographs on the first postoperative day and at 12 months in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. Standard clinical evaluations, including the limb symmetry index (LSI), were also performed. Less PLB tunnel enlargement was found in the BPTB + G group than in the hamstring group in the AP (101.9 ± 22.9 vs.113.7 ± 20.6%, p = 0.031) and lateral views (104.4 ± 18.1 vs. 120.6 ± 23.4%, p < 0.01).There was no significant difference between the groups in 12-month postoperative clinical outcomes (Lysholm's score, Tegner's activity level scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation score).The side-to-side difference was significantly less in the BPTB + G group (0.2 ± 1.3 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.026). Despite the small sizes of the BPTB and G grafts, there was no significant difference in the knee extensor LSI between the groups (92.9 ± 10.1 vs. 93.3 ± 12.2%, p = 0.707), whereas the knee flexor LSI was significantly higher in the BPTB + G group (97.7 ± 14.8 vs. 90.1 ± 13.3%, p = 0.033). Double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a small size BPTB and G composite graft procedure provided good clinical outcomes and significantly less femoral bone tunnel enlargement than the hamstring procedure 12 months after surgery. It is thus a useful surgical option for ACL-deficient Asian athletes. This study reflects level of evidence III.

Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Femoral Tunnel Widening After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Transportal and Outside-In Techniques

Background:

Previous studies have suggested that increased mechanical stress due to acute graft bending angle (GBA) is associated with tunnel widening and graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Few studies have compared the GBA between the outside-in (OI) and the transportal (TP) techniques.

Purpose:

To evaluate the influence of GBA on clinical outcomes and tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with OI versus TP technique.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included in the study were 56 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction (n = 28 in the OI group and n = 28 in the TP group). Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner score, and knee laxity) 1 year postoperatively were evaluated. Computed tomography scans at 5 days and 1 year postoperatively were used for imaging measurements, and the femoral tunnel was divided into the proximal third, middle, and aperture sections. The GBA and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured using image analysis software and were compared between groups. A correlation analysis was performed to determine if the GBA affected clinical outcomes or tunnel widening.

Results:

No significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes between the groups. The GBA of both the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral bundles were more acute in the OI group compared with the TP group (P < .05). The CSA at the AM tunnel aperture increased significantly in the OI group (84.2% ± 64.3%) compared with the TP group (51.4% ± 36.7%) (P = .04). However, there were no differences in the other sections. In the Pearson correlation test, GBA was not correlated with tunnel widening or clinical outcomes.

Conclusion:

Regardless of technique, the GBA did not have a significant influence on tunnel widening or clinical outcomes. Considering a wider AM tunnel aperture, a more proximal and posterior AM tunnel position might be appropriate with the OI technique.

[Influence of lateral posterior tibial slope on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To investigate the influence of lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the effect of tibial tunnel expansion on knee joint function.

Methods

A clinical data of 52 patients with ACL rupture, who underwent arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 20 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 14-64 years). There were 22 cases of left knee and 30 cases of right knee. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 to 30 days, with an average of 15.9 days. The knee function was evaluated by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score before operation and at 3 and 6 months after operation. At 3 and 6 months after operation, the LPTS and the width of exit, middle segment, entrance, and 2 cm from the exit of the articular surface of the tibial tunnel were measured based on MRI. The expansion of tibial tunnel was calculated and graded (degrees 0-3). According to LPTS, the patients were divided into group A (<6.0°), group B (6°-12°), and group C (>12°), and the difference in the expansion of tibial tunnel between groups was compared.

Results

All the 52 patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 7.1 months). The IKDC and Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05); and the difference of knee scores between 3 and 6 months after operation was significant ( P<0.05). The tibial tunnel expanded after operation, and the relative expansion at the exit and the middle segment showed significant difference between 3 months and 6 months after operation ( P<0.05). The expansion degree of tibial tunnel was rated as degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 28 cases, degree 2 in 16 cases, and degree 3 in 3 cases at 3 months after operation, and degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 20 cases, degree 2 in 25 cases, and degree 3 in 2 cases at 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in IKDC and Lysholm scores between patients with different expansion degrees of tibial tunnels ( P>0.05). The LPTS of 52 patients ranged from -0.8° to 18.7° (mean, 10.6°); there were 7 cases in group A, 24 cases in group B, and 21 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender, preoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores, and initial width of tibial tunnel between groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expansion of tibial tunnel at exit and middle segment between groups at 3 months after operation ( P>0.05), and there was significant difference at 6 months after operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

After anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, the tibial tunnel would expand to some extent in a short time. LPTS had a significant effect on tibial tunnel expansion, and the larger the angle was, the more obvious the expansion of the proximal tibial tunnel was. However, early knee function is not affected by tibial tunnel expansion.

[Study on reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with autologous peroneus longus tendon under arthroscopy]

Objective

To discuss the effectiveness of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with autologous peroneus longus tendon under arthroscopy.

Methods

Between January 2016 and December 2018, 46 patients with PCL injuries were enrolled. There were 34 males and 12 females, with an average age of 40.7 years (range, 20-58 years). There were 43 cases of acute injury and 3 cases of old injury. The anterior drawer test and the posterior tibia sign were positive in 4 cases, the posterior drawer tests and the posterior tibia sign were positive in 46 cases, the varus stress tests were positive in 10 cases, and the valgus stress tests were positive in 6 cases. The difference of dial-test at 30° knee flexion between affected and healthy sides was (5.20±3.91)°. The tibia posterior displacement under posterior stress position was (12.03±2.38) mm. The Lysholm score of the knee joint was 36.68±7.89, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 33.58±5.97, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS) score of the ankle joint was 97.60±1.85. PCL was reconstructed with autologous peroneus longus tendon under arthroscopy, and the combined meniscus injury, posterolateral complex injury, and anterior cruciate ligament injury were all treated according to the degree of injury.

Results

All incisions healed by first intention. Forty patients were followed up 12-26 months, with an average of 16.0 months. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score of the knee joint was 84.85±7.03, and the IKDC score was 87.13±6.27, which were significant different from preoperative ones ( t=-13.45, P=0.00; t= -39.12, P=0.00); the AOFAS score of ankle joint was 93.98±2.14, which was not significant different from preoperative one ( t=8.09, P=0.90). The tibia posterior displacement under posterior stress position was (2.75±1.76) mm and the difference of dial-test at 30° knee flexion between affected and healthy sides was (1.75±2.09)°, which were significant different from preoperative ones ( t=29.00, P=0.00; t=4.96, P=0.00). The posterior drawer test and the posterior tibia sign were positive in 1 case and negative in 39 cases; the anterior drawer test and the varus and valgus stress tests were all negative.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of PCL with autologous peroneus longus tendon under arthroscopy can significantly improve the stability and function of the knee joint, with satisfactory clinical results.

The effect of soft tissue interposition of the Endobutton on clinical results and on its postoperative migration after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the possible consequences of soft tissue interposition of Endobutton on clinical outcomes and reoperation rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

We measured the distance between the centre of the Endobutton and the lateral femoral cortex on the postoperative first day anteroposterior X-rays of the 156 knees that underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Those with a distance less than 1 mm were regarded as Group 1 (118 patients), the ones between 1 mm and 2 mm were regarded as Group 2 (30 patients) and the ones more than 2 mm were regarded as Group 3 (8 patients). The movement of the Endobutton of more than 1 mm along the femoral tunnel axis on anteroposterior X-rays or its rotation by more than 5° on lateral X-rays during follow-up were considered migration. Clinical assessment scores (Lysholm, Tegner Activity Scale), clinical examination tests, and rates of Endobutton migration in the groups were analysed.

RESULTS

Eleven Endobuttons (9.3%) in Group 1, 26 Endobuttons (86.7%) in Group 2 and all of the 8 Endobuttons (100%) in Group 3 were observed to have migrated. Clinical results and examination tests showed no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2, whereas a significant difference was detected in Group 3 compared to Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue interposition is a major cause of Endobutton migration, and an interposition over 2 mm between the Endobutton and the lateral femoral cortex can negatively affect the outcomes after an anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

[Clinical study on reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament with platelet rich plasma combined with 3-strand peroneus longus tendons]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of the reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) with platelet rich plasma (PRP) and 3-strand peroneal longus tendons under arthroscope.

METHODS

Between June 2014 and December 2017, 58 patients with PCL rupture were randomly divided into two groups: the trial group (PRP assisted reconstruction of 3-strand peroneal longus tendons) and the control group (4-strand hamstring tendon reconstruction alone), 29 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury side, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, time from injury to operation, and preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score between the two groups ( P>0.05). Before operation, at 3 months and 12 months after operation, the IKDC score and Lysholm score of the two groups were recorded to evaluate the knee joint function, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was used to evaluate ankle function; KT-2000 examination (knee flexion of 90°, 30 lbs) was used to evaluate the difference of bilateral knee joint posterior relaxation at 12 months after operation, and MRI was used to evaluate ligament reconstruction; CT was used to evaluate the bone tunnel expansion of femur and tibia at 3 months and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

The operation was completed successfully in both groups, there was no complication in the donor tendon area. All the incisions healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The follow-up time of the trial group was 13-17 months, with an average of 15.0 months; that of the control group was 15-20 months, with an average of 15.4 months. At 3 and 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score when compared with preoperative score and between the two groups ( P>0.05). At 3 and 12 months after operation, the IKDC score and Lysholm score of the two groups were significantly improved, and further improvement was found at 12 months when compared with at 3 months ( P<0.05); the scores in the trial group were significantly better than those of the control group ( P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, the difference of the posterior relaxation of the bilateral knees in the trial group was less than 5 mm in 27 cases, 6-10 mm in 2 cases; in the control group was less than 5 mm in 20 cases, 6-10 mm in 6 cases, and >10 mm in 3 cases; the difference between the two groups was not significant ( Z=0.606, P=0.544). At 12 months after operation, MRI of knee joint showed that all patients had good PCL graft. The MRI score of the trial group was better than that of the control group ( t=2.425, P=0.019). CT examination at 3 and 12 months after operation showed that the bone tunnel expansion of femur and tibia in the trial group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

PRP combined with 3-stand peroneal longus tendons can significantly improve the function and stability of knee joint, effectively promote graft remodeling, and promote tendon bone healing, reduce the expansion of bone tunnel. The effectiveness is satisfactory.

ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation

PURPOSE

To compare tunnel widening and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with interference screw fixation and all-inside reconstruction using button fixation.

METHODS

Tunnel widening was assessed using tunnel volume and diameter measurements on computed tomography (CT) scans after surgery and 6 months and 2 years later, and compared between the two groups. The clinical outcome was assessed after 2 years with instrumented tibial anteroposterior translation measurements, hop testing and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner activity scores.

RESULTS

The study population at the final follow-up was 14 patients with screw fixation and 16 patients with button fixation. Tibial tunnels with screw fixation showed significantly larger increase in tunnel volume over time (P = 0.021) and larger tunnel diameters after 2 years in comparison with button fixation (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in femoral tunnel volume changes over time or in tunnel diameters after 2 years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcome scores.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside ACLR using button fixation was associated with less tibial tunnel widening and smaller tunnels after 2 years in comparison with ACLR using screw fixation. The need for staged revision ACLRs may be greater with interference screws in comparison with button fixation at the tibial tunnel. The clinical outcomes in the two groups were comparable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II. RCT: Consort NCT01755819.

Effect of Initial Graft Tension During Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruction on Ankle Kinematics, Laxity, and In Situ Forces of the Reconstructed Graft

BACKGROUND

Although a variety of surgical procedures for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) reconstruction have been reported, the effect of initial graft tension during ATFL reconstruction remains unclear.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study investigated the effects of initial graft tension on ATFL reconstruction. We hypothesized that a high degree of initial graft tension would cause abnormal kinematics and laxity.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric ankles were tested with a robotic system with 6 degrees of freedom to apply passive plantarflexion and dorsiflexion motions and a multidirectional load. A repeated measures experiment was designed with the intact ATFL, transected ATFL, and reconstructed ATFL at initial tension conditions of 10, 30, 50, and 70 N. The 3-dimensional path and reconstructed graft tension were simultaneously recorded, and the in situ forces of the ATFL and reconstructed graft were calculated with the principle of superposition.

RESULTS

Initial tension of 10 N was sufficient to imitate normal ankle kinematics and laxity, which were not significantly different when compared with those of the intact ankles. The in situ force on the reconstructed graft tended to increase as the initial tension increased. In situ force on the reconstructed graft >30 N was significantly greater than that of intact ankles. The in situ force on the ATFL was 19 N at 30° of plantarflexion. In situ forces of 21.9, 30.4, 38.2, and 46.8 N were observed at initial tensions of 10, 30, 50, and 70 N, respectively, at 30° of plantarflexion.

CONCLUSION

Approximate ankle kinematic patterns and sufficient laxity, even with an initial tension of 10 N, could be obtained immediately after ATFL reconstruction. Moreover, excessive initial graft tension during ATFL reconstruction caused excessive in situ force on the reconstructed graft.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study revealed the effects of initial graft tension during ATFL reconstruction. These data suggest that excessive tension during ATFL reconstruction should be avoided to ensure restoration of normal ankle motion.

Early weight-bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts induce femoral bone tunnel enlargement: a prospective clinical and radiographic study

BACKGROUND

Bone tunnel enlargement following primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with soft tissue graft might be a severe disadvantage for revision surgery. The postoperative rehabilitation protocol including the non-weight-bearing periods were different depending on the surgeon or institute. To determine the relationship between femoral bone tunnel enlargement and the postoperative non-weight-bearing period after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts.

METHODS

Forty-two patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts were divided into two postoperative non-weight-bearing protocol groups: 1-week non-weight-bearing postoperatively (group A, n = 19); and 2-week non-weight-bearing (group B, n = 18). Five cases were excluded due to additional knee injury, pregnancy, and lost to follow-up. Bone tunnel enlargement was evaluated by computed digital radiographs (anteroposterior (A-P) and lateral views) taken on the first postoperative day and at 12 months. Each tunnel diameter was shown as a percentage to the maximum joint width of the proximal tibia in the A-P view, or a percentage of the maximum diameter of the patella in the lateral view. To determine the incidence of tunnel enlargement, percentage diameter changes of more than 10% were defined as an enlarged tunnel. The magnitude of tunnel enlargement and the standard clinical evaluation were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in the incidences of anteromedial and posterolateral bone tunnel enlargement, both in the A-P and lateral views (2 × 2 Chi-squared test). The magnitude of femoral posterolateral bone tunnel enlargement was significantly greater in group A in the A-P view (p = 0.01) and lateral view (p = 0.03) (Mann Whitney U-test). Twelve months after surgery, the Lysholm score and Tegner activity level scale were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, clinical and radiographical study showed that early weight-bearing protocol after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts might have the potential risk of significant postoperative femoral bone tunnel enlargement of the posterolateral bundle. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes by postoperative non-weight-bearing period. To reduce and prevent the femoral bone tunnel enlargement, the comprehensive management could be considered and required to establish the suitable early stage rehabilitation protocol after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number; UMIN000036212 . Scientific title: Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with two different postoperative non weight bearing periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts. Registered date: 15 Mar 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Femoral tunnel widening is similar between anteromedial portal and transtibial techniques following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is concern regarding the potential risk of femoral tunnel widening in the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique due to the acute graft-bending angle at the aperture and the more elliptical aperture shape of the femoral tunnel compared to the transtibial (TT) techniques. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the femoral tunnel widening between the AMP and TT techniques in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

It should be included the studies that reported on femoral tunnel widening in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction, using soft-tissue tendon graft, with AMP and/or TT techniques. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled changes of absolute millimeters of tunnel widening from the immediate postoperative status to the last follow-up did not differ significantly between the AMP and TT techniques at both the aperture [3.31 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.0. mm versus 2.9 mm, 95% CI 2.4-3.4 mm, P = n.s.] and the midportion (3.5 mm, 95% CI 0.8-6.3 mm versus 3.0 mm, 95% CI 2.2-3.9 mm, P = n.s.) of the femoral tunnel. No significant difference was observed between the two techniques in the relative percentage of femoral tunnel widening (AMP; 28.8%, 95% CI 14.8-42.9% vs. TT; 29.7%, 95% CI 15.6-43.7%, P = n.s.).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was observed between the AMP and TT techniques, both in absolute millimeter and relative percentage, in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This finding could alleviate the potential concerns associated with femoral tunnels being wider for the AMP than for the TT technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of three approaches for femoral tunnel during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A case controlled study

BACKGROUND

It is still controversial whether which femoral tunnel creation technique is best during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We aimed to clarify the features of three different techniques based on the femoral tunnel position created with the same tunnel-creating concept and the measurement data.

METHODS

The femoral tunnel of double-bundle (DB) ACLR was created using the behind-remnant approach in a remnant preserved manner following the policy of our institute. The trans-tibial approach (TT) was applied for all primary ACL injured cases until December 2012. The trans-portal approach (TP) was applied from January to September 2013, and the outside-in approach (OI) was indicated from October 2013 to March 2014. We compared the femoral tunnel aperture positions with the postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Additionally, the femoral tunnel length and the septum distance of each anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel were analyzed.

RESULTS

The AM tunnel aperture position of TT was significantly higher and shallower than that of TP in knee flexion position. The femoral tunnel length of TP was significantly shorter than that of TT and OI. The septum between each tunnel of OI trended wider than that of TT and TP.

CONCLUSIONS

The AM tunnel aperture position of TT runs the risk of a high and shallow position. TP runs the risk of insufficiently short tunnel length. It is important to apply each method flexibly to each case because no single best approach was found.

Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Tunnel Enlargement After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Hamstring Tendon

Background

The effects of remnant tissue preservation on tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not yet been established.

Hypothesis

The preservation of ACL remnant tissue may significantly reduce the degree and incidence of tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction, while the remnant-preserving procedure may not significantly increase the incidence of tunnel coalition after surgery.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A total of 79 patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Based on the Crain classification of ACL remnant tissue, 40 patients underwent the remnant-preserving procedure (group P), and the remaining 39 patients underwent the remnant-resecting procedure (group R). There were no differences between the 2 groups concerning all background factors, including preoperative knee instability and intraoperative tunnel positions. All patients were examined using computed tomography and a standard physical examination at 2 weeks and 1 year after surgery.

Results

During surgery, the femoral and tibial anteromedial (AM) tunnel sizes in both groups averaged 6.6 and 6.5 mm, respectively. The femoral and tibial posterolateral (PL) tunnel sizes in both groups averaged 6 and 6 mm, respectively. There were no differences in the intraoperative tunnel positions and tunnel sizes between groups. Concerning the femoral AM tunnel, the degree of tunnel enlargement in the oblique coronal and oblique axial views in group P was significantly less than that in group R (P = .0068 and .0323, respectively). Regarding the femoral AM tunnel cross-sectional area, the degree and incidence of tunnel enlargement in group P were significantly less than those in group R (P = .0086 and .0278, respectively). There were no significant differences in tunnel coalition between groups. In each group, there were no significant relationships between tunnel enlargement and each clinical outcome.

Conclusion

Remnant preservation in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction reduced enlargement of the femoral AM tunnel and did not increase the incidence of tunnel coalition. This is one of the advantages of remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction.

Steeper posterior tibial slope correlates with greater tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between posterior tibial slope (PTS) and tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL-R using quadriceps tendon autograft. Six months after surgery, each patient underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT). Tibial tunnel aperture location was evaluated using a grid method. Medial and lateral PTS (°) was measured based on a previously described method. To evaluate tibial tunnel widening, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tibial tunnel beneath the aperture was measured using CT axial slice. Nominal elliptical area was calculated using the diameter of a dilator during the surgery and the angle between the axial slice and the tunnel axis. Percentage of tunnel widening (%) was determined by dividing the CSA by the nominal area. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to explore the association between medial/lateral PTS and tibial tunnel widening (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Location of tibial tunnel aperture was 29.8 ± 6.3% in anterior-posterior direction, and 45.7 ± 2.1% in medial-lateral direction. Medial and lateral PTS were 3.7° ± 2.5° and 4.9° ± 2.4° respectively. Tibial tunnel widening was 97.2 ± 20.3%. Tibial tunnel widening was correlated with medial PTS (r = 0.558, P = 0.004) and lateral PTS (r = 0.431, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Steeper medial and lateral PTS correlated with greater tibial tunnel widening. The clinical relevance is that surgeons should be aware that PTS may affect tibial tunnel widening after ACL-R. Thus, subjects with steeper PTS may need to be more carefully followed to see if there is greater tibial tunnel widening, which might be important especially in revision ACL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Enhanced tendon-bone healing with acidic fibroblast growth factor delivered in collagen in a rabbit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model

Background

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of acidic fibroblast growth factor delivered in collagen (aFGF/collagen) for promoting tendon–bone interface healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in rabbits.

Methods

ACL reconstructions were performed in the right hind limbs of New Zealand rabbits. Each left long digital extensor tendon was harvested as an autograft, and collagen incorporating different concentrations of aFGF or same amount of collagen alone was applied at the tendon–bone interface after ACL reconstruction. The control group underwent ACL reconstruction only. There were high and low aFGF/collagen groups, collagen alone group, and control group (n = 21 rabbits per group). Histological and biomechanical analyses were performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively to evaluate the effect of aFGF/collagen on tendon–bone interface healing.

Results

Results of biomechanical tests showed that at both 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively, the elastic modulus and stiffness in both the high and low aFGF/collagen treatment groups were significantly higher than those in the control group and collagen alone group, with that in the high aFGF/collagen concentration group being the highest. Histological analysis showed that at 8 weeks, tightly organized Sharpey-like fibers were observed in both aFGF/collagen groups with new bone growth into the tendon in the high concentration group. At 12 weeks postoperatively, a fibrocartilage transition zone was observed in the bone tunnels in both aFGF/collagen groups, especially in the high aFGF/collagen group.

Conclusion

Application of the aFGF/collagen composite could enhance early healing at the tendon–bone interface after ACL reconstruction, especially with the use of a high aFGF/collagen concentration.

Effect of Initial Graft Tension During Calcaneofibular Ligament Reconstruction on Ankle Kinematics and Laxity

BACKGROUND

Although a variety of surgical procedures for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction have frequently been reported, little is known about the effects of initial graft tension. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate the effects of initial graft tension in calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) reconstruction. It was hypothesized that a high degree of initial graft tension would cause abnormal kinematics, laxity, and excessive graft tension.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric ankles were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system to apply passive plantarflexion-dorsiflexion motion and multidirectional loads. A repeated-measures experiment was designed with the CFL intact, CFL transected, and CFL reconstructed with 4 initial tension conditions (10, 30, 50, and 70 N). The 3-dimensional path and reconstructed graft tension were simultaneously recorded.

RESULTS

The calcaneus in CFL reconstruction with an initial tension of 70 N had the most eversion relative to the intact condition (mean eversion translations of 1.2, 3.0, 5.0, and 6.2 mm were observed at initial tensions of 10, 30, 50, and 70 N, respectively). The calcaneus also moved more posteriorly with external rotation as the initial tension increased. The reconstructed graft tension tended to increase as the initial tension increased.

CONCLUSION

Ankle kinematic patterns and laxity after CFL reconstruction tended to become more abnormal as the initial graft tension increased at the time of surgery. Moreover, excessive initial graft tension caused excessive tension on the reconstructed graft.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicated the importance of initial graft tension during CFL reconstruction. Overtensioning during CFL reconstruction should be avoided to imitate a normal ankle.

Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Hybrid Grafts in Patients Over 40 Years of Age: Comparisons Between Different Age Groups

Background:

Several recent studies have reported that favorable clinical results and a high level of patient satisfaction can generally be obtained with no increased risk of complications after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed in patients >40 years of age. However, no studies have yet clarified the age-based differences in clinical outcomes after double-bundle reconstruction.

Purpose:

To compare clinical outcomes after double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon hybrid grafts between patients in 2 different age groups: ≥40 years and <40 years.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted using 96 patients (48 men, 48 women ; mean age, 37 years) who underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction between 2008 and 2011. These patients were divided into 2 groups: group M included patients ≥40 years of age (n = 40 patients), and group Y included patients <40 years of age (n = 56 patients). All patients underwent the same anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2 years after surgery. Tunnel enlargement was also evaluated by computed digital radiography at 1 week and 2 years after surgery.

Results:

Mean postoperative side-to-side differences in anterior laxity were 0.5 ± 1.9 mm and 1.2 ± 1.5 mm in groups M and Y, respectively; there was a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .039). There were no significant differences between the groups in Lysholm knee scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, or peak muscle torque of the hamstring. On the other hand, peak muscle torque of the quadriceps was significantly lower in group M (81%) than in group Y (89%) (P = .025). With respect to femoral tunnel enlargement, the posterolateral tunnel in group M was significantly larger than that in group Y on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (P = .015 and P = .002, respectively).

Conclusion:

Equivalent clinical outcomes were seen between the 2 age groups after double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Postoperative anterior laxity was significantly less in older patients than in younger patients, however, older patients had significantly less quadriceps muscle strength than younger patients. Surgeons should be aware of residual muscle weakness and tunnel enlargement when performing double-bundle ACL reconstruction in older patients.

Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of femoral and tibial bone morphology on the amount of femoral and tibial tunnel widening after primary anatomic ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that tibial and femoral bone morphology would be significantly correlated with tunnel widening after anatomic ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients (mean age 21.8 ± 8.1 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft were enrolled. Two blinded observers measured the bone morphology of tibia and femur including, medial and lateral tibial posterior slope, medial and lateral tibial plateau width, medial and lateral femoral condyle width, femoral notch width, and bicondylar width on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Tibial and femoral tunnel width at three points (aperture, mid-section, and exit) were measured on standard anteroposterior radiograph from 1 week and 1 year postoperatively (mean 12.5 ± 2 months). Tunnel width measurements at each point were compared between 1 week and 1 year to calculate percent of tunnel widening over time. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze correlations between bone morphology and tunnel widening.

RESULT

Increase in lateral tibial posterior slope was the only independent bony morphology characteristics that was significantly correlated with an increased tibial tunnel exit widening (R = 0.58). For every degree increase in lateral tibial posterior slope, a 3.2% increase in tibial tunnel exit width was predicted (p = 0.003). Excellent inter-observer and intra-observer reliability were determined for the measurements (ICC = 0.91 and 0.88, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is an important preoperative anatomic factor that may predict tunnel widening at the tibial tunnel exit. In regard to clinical relevance, the results of this study suggest that lateral tibial posterior slope be measured preoperatively. In patients with increased lateral tibial posterior slope, more rigid graft fixation and a more conservative physical therapy regiment may be preferred. Level of evidence IV.

Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: Volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans

BACKGROUND

Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is influenced by the surgical and fixation techniques used. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate image modality for assessing tunnel widening, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might also be reliable for tunnel volume measurements. In the present study tunnel widening after ACLR using biodegradable interference screw fixation was compared with all-inside ACLR using button fixation, with tunnel volume changes being measured on CT and MRI scans.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to hamstring ACLR using a biodegradable interference screw or all-inside cortical button fixation. CT and MRI scanning were done at the time of surgery and six months after. Tunnel volume changes were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

On CT, femoral tunnel volumes changed from the postoperative state (100%) to 119.8% with screw fixation and 143.2% with button fixation (P=0.023). The changes in tibial tunnel volumes were not significant (113.9% vs. 117.7%). The changes in bone tunnel volume measured on MRI were comparable with those on CT only for tunnels with interference screws. Tibial tunnels with button fixation were significantly underestimated on MRI scanning (P=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside ACLR using cortical button fixation results in increased femoral tunnel widening in comparison with ACLR with biodegradable interference screw fixation. MRI represents a reliable imaging modality for future studies investigating tunnel widening with interference screw fixation.

Bone tunnel change develops within two weeks of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: A comparison of different postoperative immobilization periods using computed tomography

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone tunnel changes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction during the early postoperative period using computed tomography (CT), and to understand the impact of postoperative immobilization on these changes.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts were included. We subcategorized patients into two groups: patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction and had three days of knee immobilization (Group A, n=10); and patients with concomitant meniscus injuries who underwent ACL reconstruction and meniscus repair simultaneously (Group B, n=10) had their knees immobilized for two weeks after surgery. Bone tunnel enlargement was evaluated using CT imaging at one to three days, two weeks, one month, three months and six months after surgery. The cross-sectional area of the femoral and tibial tunnels was measured, and enlargement rate was calculated. The tunnel center location at two weeks after surgery was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean cross-sectional area adjacent to the joint space of the femoral and tibial tunnels significantly increased immediately after surgery, especially in the first month (P<0.01). However, after one to six months they were not increased (P>0.01). There was no significant difference in tunnel enlargement rate between group A and B. Tunnel center location changed even in the first two weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone tunnel enlargement following double-bundle ACL reconstruction occurred at an earlier time point after surgery than anticipated. Postoperative immobilization could not prevent bone tunnel enlargement, but might prevent tunnel migration.

How to evaluate bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction - a critical review

Background

Comparing different imaging modalities and methods for assessment tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction and providing a detailed evidence-based literature overview.

Methods

PubMed was searched from 1970 to 2016 using the terms "ACL reconstruction" and "tunnel" and "imaging" or "CT" or "computerized tomography" or "MRI" or "magnetic resonance imaging" or "radiographs". 647 studies were found. 575 articles were excluded due to absence of specific radiological measurement methods of tunnel widening and 40 due to repetition of a previously published radiological measurement method. 32 articles were included reporting interand intraobserver reliabilities of tunnel measurement methods after ACL reconstruction.

Results

A variety of different algorithms and measurement methods using radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or SPECT/CT evaluating tunnel position and bone tunnel enlargement have been described. Tunnel delination restricts an exact analysis using X-ray. Measurements using CT or MR were mostly obtained perpendicular to the tunnel axis or using specialized software for tunnel volume calculation in 3D.Based on the review the width of the femoral and tibial tunnels should be assessed perpendicular to the tunnel axis at different levels in relation to the joint. At least one measurement should be performed at the tunnel entrance, exit and midpoint of the tunnel.

Conclusion

CT should be considered the gold standard assessing tunnel widening in patients after ACL reconstruction. If specialized software is available calculating the tunnel volume, measurements should be preferably performed in 3D CT.

Level of evidence

II.

Morphological changes in tibial tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) is crucial for the reliable and accurate evaluation of tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the tibial tunnel enlargement at the tunnel aperture and inside the tunnel and to clarify the morphological change at the tunnel footprint 1 year after the anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) ACL reconstruction using 3D CT models.

Methods

Eighteen patients with unilateral ACL rupture were evaluated. The ATB ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosus tendon autograft was performed. 3D computer models of the tibia and the three tibial tunnels were reconstructed from CT data obtained 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery. The cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the two anterior and the one posterior tunnels were measured at the tunnel aperture and 5 and 10 mm distal from the aperture and compared between the two periods. The locations of the center and the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral edges of each tunnel footprint were also measured and compared between the two periods.

Results

The CSA of the posterior tunnel was significantly enlarged at the aperture by 40.4%, whereas that of the anterior tunnels did not change significantly, although the enlargement rate was 6.1%. On the other hand, the CSA was significantly reduced at 10 mm distal from the aperture in the anterior tunnels. The enlargement rate in the posterior tunnel was significantly greater than that in the anterior tunnels at the aperture. The center of the posterior tunnel footprint significantly shifted postero-laterally. The anterior and posterior edges of the posterior tunnel footprint demonstrated a significant posterior shift, while the lateral edge significantly shifted laterally. There was no significant shift of the center or all the edges of the anterior tunnels footprint.

Conclusions

The posterior tibial tunnel was significantly enlarged at the aperture by 40% with the morphological change in the postero-lateral direction reflected by the ACL fiber orientation 1 year after the ATB ACL reconstruction. The proper tibial tunnel location in the ACL reconstruction should be determined considering the tunnel enlargement in postero-lateral direction after surgery.

Biomechanical characteristics of the anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft

PURPOSE

To clarify 1) the force sharing between two portions of BTB graft in anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) reconstruction and 2) the knee stability in ART technique under anterior tibial load.

METHODS

Eleven fresh cadaveric knees were used. First, anterior-posterior (A-P) laxity was measured with Knee Laxity Tester^® in response to 134 N of A-P tibial load at 20° on the normal knees. Then ART ACL reconstruction was performed with a BTB graft. For graft, the patellar bone plug and tendon portion was longitudinally cut into half as AM and PL portions. After the tibial bone plug was fixed at femoral aperture, AM/PL portions were connected to the tension-adjustable force gauges at tibial tubercle, and were fixed with 10 N to each portion at 20°. Then the tension was measured 1) under anterior tibial load of 134 N at 0, 30, 60, and 90°, and 2) during passive knee extension from 120 to 0°. Next the graft tension was set at 0, 10, 20, 30, or 40 N at 20°, and the A-P laxity was measured by applying A-P load of 134 N. By comparing the laxity for the normal knee, the tension to restore the normal A-P laxity (LMP) was estimated.

RESULTS

The AM force was significantly smaller at 0° and larger at 90° than the PL force under anterior load, while the force sharing showed a reciprocal pattern. During knee extension motion, the tension of both portions gradually increased from around 5 N to 20-30 N with knee extended. And the LMP was 1.6 ± 1.0 N with a range from 0.3 to 3.5 N.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of force sharing was similar to that in the normal ACL in response to anterior tibial load and during passive knee extension motion. LMP in this procedure was close to the tension in the normal ACL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, a controlled-laboratory study.

Tunnel widening in single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees

PURPOSE

The consequence of tunnel widening after ACL reconstructions is foremost of importance in case of revision surgery. Tunnel expansion leads to bone loss close to the joint, and additional surgery with bone grafting prior to revision surgery might be necessary. The purpose of the study was to measure widening of the tunnels in single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructed knees during the first year after surgery, detected by a novel, semi-automated 3D CT imaging modality. Our hypothesis was that there would be a difference between the initial tunnel size and the size measured one year post-operatively due to the tunnel widening process. Further, the purpose was to evaluate whether there were any differences in the amount of tunnel widening between the two surgical techniques.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent DB ACL reconstruction, and 22 patients who underwent SB ACL reconstruction, performed a CT scan of the bony tunnels, during their first days after surgery and one year post-operatively. The CT scans were transformed into 3D CT reconstructions, and the tunnels were measured with the "best-fit cylinder" method, measurements at the level of tunnel aperture and 10.0 mm from the joint line.

RESULTS

All tunnels in the DB and SB ACL reconstructed knees exhibited widening during the first year after the operation (p < 0.001). The SB femoral tunnels showed more widening compared to the DB femoral AM tunnels (1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6 mm) (p < 0.001), and the SB tibial tunnels widened more compared to the DB tibial PL tunnels (1.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6) (p < 0.043).

CONCLUSION

All tunnels widened during the first year after the ACL reconstruction with a larger amount of widening in the SB tunnels compared to the DB femoral AM tunnels and the DB tibial PL tunnels. This is the first study to detect tunnel widening in DB reconstructed knees through a semi-automated 3D CT imaging modality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level III.

ACL Surgical Technique — Staying Out of Trouble

The incidence of ACL tear and reconstruction has increased over time, and failure of ACL reconstruction is not perfectly defined among surgeons. Atraumatic failure of ACL surgery represents approximately 70% of causes, and occurs in diagnostic errors, technical errors and problems of ACL graft integrations. Regarding surgical technique, we should answer certain questions about our choice of surgery, tunnel position, graft type, graft suture, tensioning the graft, and how we deal with certain incidents or intraoperative accidents. The purpose of this article is to review the current information and trends of ACL reconstruction, and presents some tips and tricks we use in our current practice.

Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Widening following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Various Modalities of Fixation: A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Bone tunnel enlargement after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACL-R) is a well-accepted phenomenon but there are very few published data comparing the extent of tunnel widening by various methods of fixation after ACL-R.

AIM

To compare the femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL-R with different methods of fixation using CT scan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This one year prospective study included all patients with chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL-R using tripled hamstring tendon autograft. The graft was fixed to the tibial tunnel by Interference Screw (IFS) or Suture Disc (SD) and to the femoral tunnel by IFS, SD, Cross-Pin (CP) or Endo-button CL (Smith & Nephew). The widening of the tibial and femoral tunnels in different methods of fixation was assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at 12 months follow-up; and was compared using paired sample test.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included in the study of which 58 (92%) were males and 5 (8%) were females, with a mean age of 29.1 ± 5.9 years. The tibial tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.680 ± 1.08794 (19.37%) and 1.517 ± 0.94834 mm (17.39%) by IFS and SD methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening at one year follow-up was 1.294 ± 0.231, 1.809 ± 0.912, 1.320 ± 0.238, 1.779 ± 0.889 mm by IFS, SD, EB, and CP methods respectively. Femoral tunnel widening following suture disc method of fixation was very highly significant (p<0.001) in comparison with other methods.

CONCLUSION

Femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel widening varies with different methods of fixation and was maximum with suture disc method compared to others at one year follow-up after ACL-R.

Remnant-preserving, selective single-bundle augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: A technical note

BACKGROUND

To the best of our knowledge, there has been no detailed study on bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts for remnant-preserving, selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmentation. Therefore, we aimed to develop such a technique using a BTB graft.

METHOD

A total of five patients underwent surgery using the presented procedure. These patients were young, male, and with high body mass index, and hence required very high durability of reconstructed ACL. A femoral bone tunnel was created using the inside-out technique via an accessory far-medial portal, protecting the remnant using a probe, regardless of the presence of an anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) tunnel. A single tibial tunnel was drilled at the center of the AM or PL attachment and two transverse skin incisions were made in the ipsilateral knee. The central third of the patellar tendon attached to a patellar and tibial bone plug autograft with a width of seven millimeters was harvested by subcutaneous tunneling. The femoral side was fixed using a cortical fixation device for BTB and the tibial bone plug was fixed using an interference screw with the knee at an angle of 20° of flexion by applying maximal manual traction.

RESULTS

Bone tunnel enlargement, which was measured by computed digital radiography, was not observed in all cases. A BTB autograft for remnant-preserving, selective-bundle ACL augmentation offers reduced risk of tunnel enlargement.

CONCLUSION

The presented procedure might be considered one of the potentially available options for patients with ACL partial tear who require very high durability of reconstructed ACL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to apply the anatomic ACL reconstruction scoring checklist (AARSC) and to evaluate the degree to which clinical studies comparing single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions are anatomic.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was performed using the databases PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 1995 to January 2014 comparing SB and DB ACL reconstructions with clinical outcome measurements were included. The items from the AARSC were recorded for both the SB and DB groups in each study.

RESULTS

Eight-thousand nine-hundred and ninety-four studies were analysed, 77 were included. Randomized clinical trials (29; 38%) and prospective comparative studies (29; 38%) were the most frequent study type. Most studies were published in 2011 (19; 25%). The most commonly reported items for both SB and DB groups were as follows: graft type (152; 99%), femoral and tibial fixation method (149; 97% respectively), knee flexion angle during graft tensioning (124; 8%) and placement of the tibial tunnel at the ACL insertion site (101; 66%). The highest level of documentation used for ACL tunnel position for both groups was often one dimensional, e.g. drawing, operative notes or o'clock reference. The DB reconstruction was in general more thoroughly reported. The means for the AARSC were 6.9 ± 2.8 for the SB group and 8.3 ± 2.8 for the DB group. Both means were below a proposed required minimum score of 10 for anatomic ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial underreporting of surgical data for both the SB and DB groups in clinical studies. This underreporting creates difficulties when analysing, comparing and pooling results of scientific studies on this subject.

The mechanism of "killer turn" causing residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

The residual laxity after transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction has been reported by several authors. The sharp angle where the graft exits the tibial tunnel, which is known as "killer turn", is believed to be the main reason. The purpose of this study was to reveal the mechanism of "killer turn" and its effect on both graft and tunnel inlet.

Methods

A total of 60 New Zealand white rabbits were included. All transtibial PCL reconstructions were performed in vitro using Achilles tendon autograft. The cyclic loading tests were conducted when reconstructed knees were subjected to 1500 cycles of tensile force of 50 N with the angle of pull at 45° to the tibial plateau. The tunnel inlet enlargement, graft elongation, stiffness, graft displacement, load to failure, and failure site were all recorded and analysed.

Results

Fifty-eight New Zealand white rabbits were available for biomechanical evaluation. The subjects had significant graft elongation and tunnel enlargement. The graft displacement increased by a mean of 0.92 ± 0.36 mm (16.70%). At the 1500^th cycle, the grafts were significantly elongated by 5.59 ± 4.98%, and the tunnel inlet diameter was also significantly enlarged by 12.08 ± 4.31%. There was a linear correlation between total graft displacement and the two variables (R2 = 0.402, F = 18.515, p < 0.001). The coefficient for tunnel inlet enlargement was 0.419 (p = 0.006), and for graft elongation was 0.583 (p = 0.002). At the load-to-failure test, the failure load was 81.19 ± 20.13 N. Of the 58 grafts, 31 (53.45%) failed at the "killer turn", 13 (22.41%) for the para-tunnel fracture, seven (12.07%) for the graft pull-out, and the remaining seven (12.07%) for the rupture at the mounting site.

Conclusion

The mechanism of "killer turn" compromising posterior stability was that the repetitive friction between graft and tunnel inlet not only attenuated the graft, but also enlarged the tunnel inlet, leading to the displacement of the graft.

Morphological changes in femoral tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Few studies investigated the enlargement inside the tunnel as well as the morphological change at the aperture after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, whereas the tunnel enlargement has been well documented. The purposes were to evaluate the change in the cross-sectional area along the femoral tunnel and to morphologically clarify the enlargement at the femoral tunnel aperture after anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included 15 patients with unilateral ACL rupture. ATB ACL reconstruction was performed using semitendinosus tendon autografts. Three-dimensional computer models of the femur and bone tunnels were reconstructed from computed tomography images obtained 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. The cross-sectional area at the aperture as well as inside the tunnel was compared between the two periods. Likewise, the location of tunnel walls and center in the tunnel footprint were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional area enlarged by 22.7 % for anteromedial/intermediate graft (P = 0.002) and 28.6 % for posterolateral graft (P = 0.002) at the aperture, while decreased by 36.2 % at 10 mm from the aperture for anteromedial/intermediate graft (P = 0.004). Both the anterior and posterior walls shifted anteriorly, while the distal wall shifted distally in both tunnels. Consequently, the center in the footprint significantly shifted anteriorly (4.9-6.6 %) and distally (2.2-2.6 %) in both tunnels.

CONCLUSIONS

The femoral tunnel enlargement occurred at the aperture after ATB ACL reconstruction, but did not occur in the middle of the femoral tunnel. The morphology at the aperture changed with time after surgery as the tunnel walls translated anteriorly and distally.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Bone Tunnel Diameter Measured with CT after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Double-Bundle Auto-Hamstring Tendons: Clinical Implications

Objective

To evaluate the correlation between bone tunnel diameter after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction measured by computed tomography (CT) using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and stability or clinical scores.

Materials and Methods

Forty-seven patients (41 men and 6 women, mean age: 34 years) who had undergone ACL reconstruction with the double bundle technique using auto-hamstring graft and had subsequently received CT scans immediately after the surgery (T1: range, 1-4 days, mean, 2.5 days) and at a later time (T2: range, 297-644 days, mean, 410.4 days) were enrolled in this study. The diameter of each tunnel (two femoral and two tibial) at both T1 and T2 were independently measured using MPR technique by two radiologists. Stability and clinical scores were evaluated with a KT-2000 arthrometer, International Knee Documentation Committee objective scores, and the Lysholm score. Statistical analysis of the correlation between the diameter at T2 or the interval diameter change ratio ([T2 - T1] / T1) and clinical scores or stability was investigated.

Results

The tibial bone tunnels for the anteromedial bundles were significantly widened at T2 compared with T1 (observer 1, 0.578 mm to 0.698 mm, p value of < 0.001; observer 2, 0.581 mm to 0.707 mm, p value of < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the diameter at T2 and stability or clinical scores and between the interval change ratio ([T2 - T1] / T1) and stability or clinical scores (corrected p values for all were 1.0). Intraobserver agreement for measurements was excellent (> 0.8) for both observers. Interobserver agreement for measurement was excellent (> 0.8) except for the most distal portion of the femoral bone tunnel for anterior medial bundle in immediate postoperative CT, which showed moderate agreement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.6311).

Conclusion

Neither the diameter nor its change ratio during interval follow-up is correlated with stability or clinical scores.

A modified quadrant method for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction using two-view plain radiographs

PURPOSE

A modified quadrant method was developed for description of femoral tunnel aperture positions on the sagittal plane after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, which can be measured by using two-view radiographs. The purpose of the study is to provide a new measurement method and to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of the method.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who had undergone a double-bundle ACL reconstruction were investigated. Two-view plain radiographs, a 45-degree-flexion posterior-anterior standing (Rosenberg) and a lateral view, were taken at 1 year postoperatively, and the femoral tunnel positions were measured. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was calculated by means of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the accuracy of the method was evaluated by comparing the measurement from three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

RESULTS

Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Inter-observer reproducibility of antero-medial (AM) tunnel position was almost perfect (ICC > 0.8) and that of postero-lateral (PL) tunnel was substantial (ICC > 0.7). The accuracy of the method was assessed by comparing the measurement from 3D-CT and was found to be almost perfect (ICC > 0.8). With the modified quadrant method, the average height of AM and PL tunnels were 17.8 and 44.4 %, respectively, and the depth of AM and PL tunnels were 25.5 and 36.7 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified quadrant method was found to have acceptable reproducibility and accuracy. The method is useful for describing the femoral tunnel aperture positions in ACL reconstruction because of its easiness and simplicity. By using this method, it is possible to analyse the femoral tunnel position even in the cases without CT analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Prospective comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement with 3 different postoperative immobilization periods after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of differing postoperative immobilization periods on femoral bone tunnel enlargement and clinical outcome after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring grafts.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients undergoing primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts were divided into 3 postoperative immobilization protocol groups: 2-day immobilization with the knee in 20° of flexion postoperatively (group A, n = 18); 1-week immobilization (group B, n = 17); and 2-week immobilization (group C, n = 16). Bone tunnel enlargement was determined by computed digital radiographs taken on the first postoperative day and at 24 months in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. Each tunnel diameter was shown as a percentage of the maximum joint width of the proximal tibia on the AP view or a percentage of the maximum diameter of the patella on the lateral view. To determine the incidence of tunnel enlargement, a percentage diameter change of more than 10% was defined as an enlarged tunnel. The standard clinical evaluation was also performed. This study used nonrandomized procedures.

RESULTS

In each group there were no significant differences in the incidence and magnitude of anteromedial and posterolateral bone tunnel enlargement on both the AP and lateral views (1-factor analysis of variance). Group C showed significantly less muscle strength in knee extension compared with the contralateral knee (85.3% ± 18.4%) than group A (93.7% ± 13.1%, P = .049) and group B (96.8% ± 12.9%, P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective radiographic study showed that femoral bone tunnel enlargement, in both the anteromedial and posterolateral tunnels, may occur after double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts despite different postoperative immobilization periods, with no significant difference in the incidence and magnitude among groups with differing postoperative immobilization periods. In addition, a 2-week immobilization period after surgery showed harmful effects, such as significantly less quadriceps muscle strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Outcome of anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using multistranded hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-one patients (mean age 28 ± 10 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction were examined. Using an outside-in femoral drill guide, an upper femoral tunnel for the anteromedial (AM) graft was created just below the superior articular cartilage margin of the medial wall of the lateral condyle through a small incision. A lower femoral tunnel for the posterolateral (PL) graft was drilled in the centre of the inferior-posterior half of the attachment area behind the resident's ridge in the same manner. Two tibial tunnels were created at the centre of the AM and PL bundle footprints of a normal ACL. Patients were evaluated at 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

According to the IKDC form, 52 knees (43 %) were graded as normal, 64 (53 %) as nearly normal, 1 (1 %) as abnormal and 4 (3 %) as graft rupture due to re-injury. Loss of knee extension of <5° was observed in one patient (1 %). Among 111 patients who were directly evaluated, none showed loss of flexion of <5°. Lachman sign was negative in 103 patients (93 %), while the pivot shift test result was negative or equivalent to that of the contralateral healthy knee in 103 patients (93 %). The mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-2000 arthrometer(®) was 0.9 ± 1.1 mm, and 94 % of patients showed a range between -1 and +2 mm.

CONCLUSION

The anatomical double-bundle outside-in ACL reconstruction provided a satisfactory short-term outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the outcome of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an allograft in comparison with ACL reconstruction using a double-bundle autograft or a single-bundle allograft.

METHODS

A total of 424 patients who accepted primary ACL reconstructions were divided randomly into three groups: double-bundle technique with autograft (DB-AU group, n = 154), double-bundle technique with allograft (DB-AL group, n = 128), and single-bundle technique with allograft (SB group, n = 142). The KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests were performed at 3, 12, and 36 months after surgery, and clinical outcome measurements include the Lysholm score and the IKDC rating scales. Radiological assessments evaluated arthritic changes and tunnel expansion at 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The KT-1000 test scores in the DB-AU and DB-AL groups were significantly better than those in the SB group at 12 and 36 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The pivot-shift tests scores in the DB-AU and DB-AL groups were significantly better than those in the SB group at the 3, 12, and 36 month follow-ups (P < 0.05). Based on the IKDC score and Lysholm score, there were no significant difference between the three groups during follow-up (P > 0.05). At 36 months postoperatively, 42.3 % of patients in the SB group showed a progression in arthritic changes, which was greater than in the DB-AU (29.2 %) and DB-AL (27.3 %) groups (P < 0.05). At 36 months, the rates of tunnel expansion in the DB-AU group and the DB-AL group were lower than in the SB group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can be used to achieve better anterior and rotational stability and has a lower rate of arthritic progression and tunnel expansion than the single-bundle procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Femoral marrow cavity bone harvesting used for arthroscopic refilling of misplaced or enlarged bone tunnels in revision ACL surgery: an arthroscopically supported technique with antegrade intramedullary bone harvesting by a reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system

PURPOSE

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery, refilling of misplaced or enlarged tunnels frequently requires bone harvesting from the iliac crest. Unfortunately, donor-site pain displays a relevant complication. In order to optimize patients' comfort, we developed a procedure combining minimally invasive intramedullary bone harvesting from the femur with arthroscopic tunnel refilling.

METHODS

Patients with ACL reconstruction failure that were not eligible for one-step revision surgery but required tunnel refilling prior to the next ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively. Cancellous bone was harvested intramedullarily from the ipsilateral femur using the reamer-irrigator-aspirator system in a minimally invasive manner. Afterwards, the femoral and tibial tunnels were arthroscopically refilled using cones and push rods. Computer tomography (CT) analyses were carried out before and after the filling procedure. Pain levels were assessed during the entire follow-up. Patients undergoing iliac crest bone harvesting for other reasons served as a control group. Finally, the quality of the newly formed bone stock was evaluated in the subsequent ACL reconstruction procedure.

RESULTS

Five patients were included during a 6-month period. Prior to refilling, tunnel analysis revealed a mean tunnel volume of 7.9 cm(3) at the femur [SD ± 5.3 cm(3)] and of 6.7 cm(3) [SD ± 5.1 cm(3)] at the tibia. The CT analyses further revealed that graft failure was predominantly caused by tunnel misplacement. Post-operatively, pain levels due to intramedullary bone harvesting were significantly lower compared to iliac crest bone harvesting at every analysed time point. Three to five months after tunnel filling, CT analyses showed sufficiently incorporated bone stocks with filling rates of 75 % femoral and 94 % tibial. ACL revision surgery was performed 4-5 months after tunnel filling without any complication.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary bone harvesting from the ipsilateral femur combined with arthroscopic refilling of the bone tunnels ensures a high-quality bone stock for further ACL reconstruction. The clinical relevance is shown by the feasibility of this technique and the significantly reduced pain levels during post-operative recovery.

Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review

PURPOSE

To describe current evidence on single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in terms of differences in knee kinematics, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and graft failures.

METHODS

An electronic search was made using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 1995 to August 2011 were included, and an updated search was made in PubMed in July 2012. Therapeutic studies, level of evidence I-III, for isolated primary ACL tears written in English comparing single- and double-bundle reconstruction reporting clinical outcome were included. Quality appraisal based on Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was performed.

RESULTS

Of 7,154 potentially eligible studies, 60 papers were included (25 randomised controlled trials, 21 prospective comparative studies, 14 retrospective comparative studies), comprising 4,146 patients (2,072 single-bundle, 2,074 double-bundle). Minor differences were found between study types. An analysis of graft failures revealed fewer re-ruptures in double-bundle reconstruction than single-bundle, 19 and 44, respectively. Up to 45 % of the studies reported a superior outcome in double-bundle reconstruction in terms of antero-posterior laxity, measured with the Lachman, anterior drawer, KT-1000/2000 and navigation. Measurements of rotatory laxity revealed superior results in double-bundle reconstruction measured with pivot shift and navigation in 18/42 (8/15 anatomically reconstructed) and 9/20 studies, respectively. Patient-reported outcome measures and functional outcomes did not differ to a large extent; however, differences when identified were almost exclusively in favour of double-bundle reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, double-bundle reconstruction appears to have fewer re-ruptures and less antero-posterior and rotatory laxity. Furthermore, no differences were found in short-term patient-reported outcome measures or objective findings. However, detailed statistical analyses of the included studies divided into homogeneous groups are needed to avoid reporting bias and to confirm any statistical difference.

Measurements of bone tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2D versus 3D computed tomography model

BACKGROUND

Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires a precise evaluation of previous tunnel locations and diameters. Enlargement of the tunnels, despite not usually affecting primary reconstruction outcomes, plays an important role in revision ACL management. Three dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) models are reported to be the most accurate method for identifying the tunnel position and possible conflicts with a revision tunnel placement. However, the ability of 3D CT to measure the tunnel size is still not proven. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of measuring the size of the bone tunnels in ACL reconstructed knees with 3D CT compared to the traditional two dimensional (2D) CT method.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients had CT scans performed immediately following ACL reconstruction surgery. Their femoral tunnels size were measured by a standard 2D CT measurement and then compared with three novel 3D CT measuring methods: the best transverse section method, the best fit cylinder method and the wall thickness method. The drill size used during surgery was used as a control measure for the tunnel width. Intra-class correlation coefficients were obtained.

RESULTS

The intra-class correlation coefficient and respective 95% confidence interval range (ICC [95%CI]) for the three methods compared with the drill sizes were 0.899 [0.811-0.947] for the best transverse section method, 0.745 [0.553-0.862] for the best fit cylinder method, -0.004 [-0.081 to -0.12] for the wall thickness method and 0.922 [0.713-0.97] for the 2D CT method. The mean differences compared to the drill size were 0.02 mm for the best fit transverse section method, 0.01 mm for the best fit cylinder diameter method, 3.34 mm for the wall thickness method and 0.29 mm for the 2D CT method. The intra-rater agreement (ICC [95%CI]) was excellent for the best transverse section method 0.999 [0.998-0.999] and the 2D CT method 0.969 [0.941-0.984].

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D best transverse section method presented a high correlation to the drill sizes and high intra-rater agreement, and was the best method for ACL tunnel evaluation in a 3D CT based model.

Tunnel communication and increased graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of tunnel communication and increased graft signal intensity (SI) and clinical evaluation of knee stability and outcome after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients were evaluated with 1.5 T MRI and with clinical evaluation 2 years after DB ACL reconstruction. The MRI finding of tunnel communication was defined as the absence of a bony bridge between the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnels. The SI of the intra-articular portion of both grafts was analyzed on proton-density (PD)-weighted and T2-weighted images and graded on a scale, with I being a normal SI similar to that of the posterior cruciate ligament, II being > 50% of the graft having a normal SI, and III being < 50% of the graft having a normal SI. The clinical evaluation of knee stability and function included KT-1,000 arthrometric side-to-side difference, pivot shift test, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee evaluation scores. The association between the MRI findings and the clinical findings was calculated using the Fisher exact test and the 2-tailed t test.

RESULTS

Tunnel communication was seen in the femur in 10% of patients and in the tibia in 27% of patients. Increased graft SI was seen in 15% of the AM grafts and 59% of the PL grafts. No statistically significant association (P < .05) between the MRI findings of tunnel communication or increased graft SI and knee laxity was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI findings of tunnel communication or increased graft SI were not associated with knee laxity 2 years after DB ACL reconstruction. Tibial tunnel communication was associated with increased range of movement with flexion, and increased AM graft SI was associated with reduced range of flexion in the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Comparison of anatomic ACL reconstruction between selective bundle reconstruction and double-bundle reconstruction

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic results of preserved ligament remnants in the selective bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and totally sacrificed ligament remnant in the double-bundle ACL reconstruction in order to confirm the evidence of selective bundle reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study was conducted for comparison between preserved ligament remnants in the selective bundle ACL reconstruction and totally sacrificed ligament remnant in the double-bundle ACL reconstruction. From 2008 to 2010, 16 patients (group I) underwent selective bundle ACL reconstruction and 30 patients (group II) underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clinical, stability and radiologic results (tunnel locations of femoral tunnels using 3-D computed tomography and graft signal intensity using magnetic resonance imaging) were compared.

RESULTS

In comparison with functional results, no statistical differences in the Lysholm, Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were observed between the two groups (n.s.). In comparison with stability results between the two groups, no statistical differences were observed in the Lachman, pivot shift and anterior drawer stress tests using a Telos device at 30° and 90° flexed positions (n.s.). In evaluation of the femoral tunnel location, no statistical significant differences in the tunnel position were observed between the groups (n.s.). No statistically significant differences in signal intensity were observed between the two groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the double-bundle ACL reconstruction, selective bundle ACL reconstruction produced comparable clinical and radiologic results. Selective bundle ACL reconstruction could be performed instead of double-bundle ACL reconstruction if some intact bundle exists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Comparative study, Level III.

Tibiofemoral relationship following anatomic triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the tibiofemoral relationship sequentially before and after anatomic triple-bundle (TB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the same patients.

METHODS

Nine patients with complete unilateral ACL rupture participated in this study. Anatomic TB ACL reconstruction was performed using autogenous semitendinosus tendon grafts. Computed tomography images were obtained before surgery as well as 3 weeks and 6 months afterwards. During image acquisition, the patient's knees were fully extended in the supine position. Using three-dimensional computer models, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral displacement of the tibia relative to the femur were evaluated for each period, as were internal-external and varus-valgus rotation, followed by calculation of side-to-side differences in parameters. As the control group, 7 healthy volunteers were evaluated.

RESULTS

The tibia was located anteriorly by 1.4 ± 0.9 mm and rotated internally by 2.1 ± 1.7° before surgery, while the tibia was located posteriorly by 2.0 ± 1.2 mm and rotated externally by 3.4 ± 3.5° 3 weeks after surgery. Six months after surgery, there was no significant difference between the patient and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The anteriorly located and internally rotated tibia in ACL-deficient knees was over-constrained (posterior displacement and external rotation) 3 weeks after anatomic TB ACL reconstruction, but returned to the normal position 6 months afterwards. Therefore, anatomic tunnel placement, appropriate initial tension, and moderate rehabilitation can be the key for return to the normal tibiofemoral relationship after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV.