Surgical management of grade 3 medial knee injuries combined with cruciate ligament injuries

Nonoperative Management, Repair, or Reconstruction of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Combined Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries-Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is a common injury pattern and accounts for 20% of all ligamentous knee injuries. Despite advancements in surgical technique, there is no up-to-date consensus regarding the superiority of nonoperative versus operative management in higher-grade MCL tears of combined ACL-MCL injuries.

PURPOSE

To interpret recent literature on treatment options and to provide an updated evidence-based approach for management of combined ACL-MCL knee injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on outcomes following treatment of concomitant ACL and MCL injuries. A computerized search was conducted in PubMed, Embase.com, and Scopus.com. Authors independently assessed eligible studies and screened titles and abstracts. Articles reporting on patients with concomitant ACL and MCL injuries with or without concomitant procedures were included. Data regarding study design, sample size, patient age and sex, length of follow-up, timing of surgery, indications, surgical methods, concomitant procedures, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functional outcomes, including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and range of motion, were estimated via meta-analysis and compared statistically by surgical approach.

RESULTS

In total, 18 studies were included in the systematic review with level 1 to level 4 evidence, with a total of 1,534 cases, were included in the systematic review. Of these, 16 studies with sufficient statistical reporting including 997 cases with sufficient follow-up were included in meta-analysis. Three different approaches to combined ACL-MCL injuries were identified: ACL reconstruction with (1) nonoperative MCL, (2) MCL repair, and (3) MCL reconstruction. There was no statistical difference between nonoperative versus surgically managed MCL injuries for PROs, range of motion at final follow up, or quadriceps strength.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of combined injury in a delayed fashion facilitates return of range of motion and may allow time for low-grade MCL tears to heal. If residual valgus or anteromedial rotatory laxity remains after a period of rehabilitation, then concomitant surgical management of ACL and MCL injuries is warranted. Avulsion MCL injuries and Stener-type lesions may benefit from early repair techniques.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Shows High Rates of Return to Activity and Low Rates of Recurrent Valgus Instability: An Updated Systematic Review

Purpose

To examine the clinical outcomes and return to sport rates after treatment of combined, complete (grade III) injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL).

Methods

A literature search of the following databases was completed using key words related to combined ACL and (MCL) tears: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and SPORTDiscus. Level I-IV studies that examined patients with complete tears of the ACL and grade III tears of the MCL, diagnosed by either magnetic resonance imaging or clinical examination of valgus instability, were included. Study inclusion was determined by 2 independent reviewers. Patient demographics, treatment choices, and patient outcomes, including clinical examination (i.e., range of motion, hamstring strength) and subjective assessments (i.e., International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm scores, Tegner activity scores) were collected.

Results

Six possible treatment combinations were assessed. Good or excellent outcomes related to range of motion, knee stability, subjective assessments, and return to play were reported after ACL reconstruction regardless of MCL treatment. Those with combined ACL and MCL reconstruction returned to their previous level of activity at a high rate (range, 87.5%-90.6%) with low rates of recurrent valgus instability. Triangular MCL reconstruction with a posterior limb that serves to reconstruct the posterior-oblique ligament best-restored anteromedial rotatory stability of the knee when compared with anatomic MCL reconstruction (90.6% and 65.6%, respectively). Nonsurgical management of the ACL injury, regardless of MCL treatment, demonstrated low return to activity (29%) and frequent secondary knee injuries.

Conclusions

High rates of return to sport with low risk of recurrent valgus instability have been demonstrated after MCL reconstruction, and triangular MCL reconstruction can more effectively restore anteromedial rotatory instability compared with MCL repair. Restoration of valgus stability can be common after reconstruction of the ACL with or without surgical management of the MCL, although patients with grade III tibial-sided or mid-substance injuries were less likely to regain valgus stability with nonoperative treatment than femoral-sided injuries.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Comparative study of superficial medial collateral ligament reconstruction combined with posterior oblique ligament reconstruction or posteromedial capsule advance in grade III injuries of the medial compartment in a complex knee injury scenario

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the combined reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and the posterior oblique ligament (POL) with the reconstruction of the sMCL associated with the advancement of the posteromedial capsule in a complex knee injury scenario. We hypothesized that both techniques would present similar knee stability and failure rates.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study designed to compare the results of the two reported techniques for grade III MCL instability. Patients undergoing MCL reconstruction associated with anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, or both, from 2010 to 2019, were included. The following parameters were evaluated: demographic data, type of graft, time from injury to surgery, associated meniscus injuries, follow up time, mechanism of trauma, postoperative objective IKDC, subjective IKDC and Lysholm scales, range of motion, reconstruction failure and complications.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were evaluated, 37 of whom underwent reconstruction of the sMCL and POL, and 41 of whom underwent reconstruction of the sMCL with advancement of posteromedial structures. There was no difference in any preoperative variable. Patients undergoing reconstruction of the sMCL + advancement had greater loss of flexion (Group 1 3.4 ± 4.6 vs Group 2 8.4 ± 7.9; P = 0.002) and more individuals with flexion loss greater than 10° (Group 1, seven patients (18.9%) vs Group 2, 17 patients (41.5%); P = 0.031). Postoperative knee stability, failures and complications were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques presented good functional results and low rates of complications. However, the advancement technique showed greater flexion loss, which should be considered when choosing the best surgical option.

Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Augmentation With Bioinductive Scaffold: Surgical Technique and Indications

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee; however, only a minority of cases require surgical intervention. Classically, isolated grade I and II MCL injuries are treated nonoperatively whereas isolated grade III injuries may be treated with surgery. High-grade MCL injuries are frequently associated with concomitant knee ligamentous injuries, particularly the anterior cruciate ligament. Nonetheless, MCL repair or reconstruction is generally reserved for patients with persistent valgus instability after failed nonoperative management. Synthetic and biological implants are increasing in popularity to augment repairs and reconstructions for biomechanical reinforcement and promotion of the native healing response to hasten rehabilitation. The BioBrace (Biorez, New Haven, CT) is a bioinductive scaffold composed of highly porous type I collagen and bioresorbable poly(L-lactide) microfilaments, providing an environment for soft-tissue regeneration and mechanical support. The purpose of this article is to describe the surgical technique and relative indications for the BioBrace in knee MCL ligament repairs and reconstructions.

Comparative Outcomes Occur After Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Augmented Repair vs Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have reported good short-term results for superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) reconstruction, whether an augmented MCL repair is clinically equivalent remains unclear.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between randomized groups that underwent sMCL augmentation repair and sMCL autograft reconstruction. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences in objective or subjective outcomes between groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively enrolled between 2013 and 2019 from 3 centers. Grade III sMCL injuries were confirmed via stress radiography. Patients were randomized to anatomic sMCL reconstruction versus augmented repair with surgical treatment, determined after examination under anesthesia confirmed sMCL incompetence. Postoperative visits occurred at 6 weeks and 6 months for repeat evaluation, with repeat stress radiography at final follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures were obtained pre- and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. The primary outcome measure was side-to-side difference on valgus stress radiographs at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The two 1-sided t test procedure was used to test clinical equivalence for side-to-side difference in valgus gapping, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measures between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were prospectively enrolled into this study. Of these, 50 patients had 6-month stress radiograph data, while 40 had 1-year postoperative valgus stress radiograph data. The mean (SD) patient age was 38.0 years (14.2), and body mass index was 25.0 (3.6). Preoperative valgus stress radiographs demonstrated 3.74 mm (1.1 mm) of increased side-to-side gapping overall, while it was 4.10 mm (1.46 mm) in the MCL augmentation group and 3.42 mm (0.55 mm) in the MCL reconstruction group. Postoperative valgus stress radiographs at an average of 6 months were obtained in 50 patients after surgery, which showed 0.21 mm (0.81 mm) for the MCL augmentation group and 0.19 mm (0.67 mm) for the MCL reconstruction group (P = .940). At final follow-up (minimum 1 year), median (interquartile range) Lysholm scores were significantly higher in the reconstruction group (90 [83-99]) as compared with the repair group (80 [67-92]) (P = .031). Final International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were also significantly higher for the reconstruction group (85 [68-89]) versus the repair group (72 [60-78] (P = .039). Postoperative Tegner scores were not significantly different between the repair group (5 [3.5-6]) and the reconstruction group (5.5 [4-7]) (P = .123). Patient satisfaction was also not significantly different between repair (7.5 [5.75-9.25]) and reconstruction groups (9.0 [7-10]) (P = .184).

CONCLUSION

This study found no difference in objective outcomes between an sMCL augmentation repair and a complete sMCL reconstruction at 1 year postoperatively, indicating equivalence between these procedures. Patient-reported clinical outcomes favored the reconstruction over a repair. In addition, this study demonstrated that anatomic-based treatment of MCL tears with an early knee motion program had a very low risk of graft attenuation and a low risk of arthrofibrosis.

Treatment of Combined Injuries to the ACL and the MCL Complex: A Consensus Statement of the Ligament Injury Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG)

Background:

Different indications and treatment options for combined injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) are not clearly defined.

Purpose:

To perform a modified Delphi process with the Committee for Ligament Injuries of the German Knee Society (DKG) in order to structure and optimize the process of treating a combined injury to the ACL and MCL.

Study Design:

Consensus statement.

Methods:

Scientific questions and answers were created based on a comprehensive literature review using the central registers for controlled studies of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane including the terms medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, MCL, ACL, and outcome used in various combinations. The obtained statements passed 3 cycles of a modified Delphi process during which each was readjusted and rated according to the available evidence (grades A-E) by the members of the DKG Ligament Injuries Committee and its registered guests.

Results:

The majority of answers, including several questions with >1 graded answer, were evaluated as grade E (n = 16) or C (n = 10), indicating that a low level of scientific evidence was available for most of the answers. Only 5 answers were graded better than C: 3 answers with a grade of A and 2 answers with a grade of B. Only 1 answer was evaluated as grade D. An agreement of >80% (range, 83%-100%) among committee members was achieved for all statements.

Conclusion:

The results of this modified Delphi process offer a guideline for standardized patient care in cases of combined injuries to the ACL and MCL.

Ultrasound-based evaluation revealed reliable postoperative knee stability after combined acute ACL and MCL injuries

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are often combined with lesions of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcome of combined acute ACL and MCL lesions using functional US and clinical examination.

Methods

Patients aged > 18 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with concomitant operative (group 1) or non-operative treatment of the MCL (group 2) between 2014 and 2019 were included after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Grade II MCL injuries with dislocated tibial or femoral avulsions and grade III MCL ruptures underwent ligament repair whereas grade II injuries without dislocated avulsions were treated non-operatively. Radiological outcome was assessed with functional US examinations. Medial knee joint width was determined in a supine position at 0° and 30° of knee flexion in unloaded and standardized loaded (= 15 Dekanewton) conditions using a fixation device. Clinical examination was performed and patient-reported outcomes were assessed by the use of the subjective knee form (IKDC), Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity scale.

Results

A total of 40 patients (20 per group) met inclusion criteria. Mean age of group 1 was 40 ± 12 years (60% female) with a mean follow-up of 33 ± 17 months. Group 2 showed a mean age of 33 ± 8 years (20% female) with a mean follow-up of 34 ± 15 months. Side-to-side differences in US examinations were 0.4 ± 1.5 mm (mm) in 0° and 0.4 ± 1.5 mm in 30° knee flexion in group 1, and 0.9 ± 1.1 mm in 0° and 0.5 ± 1.4 mm in 30° knee flexion in group 2, with no statistically significant differences between both groups. MCL repair resulted in lower Lysholm scores (75 ± 19 versus 86 ± 15; p < 0.05). No significant differences could be found for subjective IKDC or Tegner activity scores among the two groups.

Conclusion

A differentiated treatment concept in combined ACL and MCL injuries based on injury patterns leads to reliable postoperative ligamentous knee stability in US-based and clinical examinations. However, grade II and III MCL lesions with subsequent operative MCL repair (group 1) result in slightly poorer subjective outcome scores.

Level of evidence

Retrospective cohort study; Level III

The posteromedial corner of the knee: an international expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation

PURPOSE

To establish recommendations for diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of posteromedial corner (PMC) knee injuries using a modified Delphi technique.

METHODS

A list of statements concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment and rehabilitation of PMC injuries was created by a working group of four individuals. Using a modified Delphi technique, a group of 35 surgeons with expertise in PMC injuries was surveyed, on three occasions, to establish consensus on the inclusion or exclusion of each statement. Experts were encouraged to propose further suggestions or modifications following each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. The final document included statements reaching consensus in round three.

RESULTS

Thirty-five experts had a 100% response rate for all three rounds. A total of 53 items achieved over 75% consensus. The overall rate of consensus was 82.8%. Statements pertaining to PMC reconstruction and those regarding the treatment of combined cruciate and PMC injuries reached 100% consensus. Consensus was reached for 85.7% of the statements on anatomy of the PMC, 90% for those relating to diagnosis, 70% relating to classification, 64.3% relating to the treatment of isolated PMC injuries, and 83.3% relating to rehabilitation after PMC reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

A modified Delphi technique was applied to generate an expert consensus statement concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation practices for PMC injuries of the knee with high levels of expert agreement. Though the majority of statements pertaining to anatomy, diagnosis, and rehabilitation reached consensus, there remains inconsistency as to the optimal approach to treating isolated PMC injuries. Additionally, there is a need for improved PMC injury classification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Simultaneous Bilateral Rupture of the Patellar Tendon and Medial Collateral Ligament: A Case Report and Literature Review

Bilateral rupture of the patellar tendon is considered an uncommon and rare musculoskeletal injury. The association of this lesion with medial collateral ligament tear appears to be exceedingly rare. We present the case of a combined rupture of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the patellar tendon of both knees in a 48-year-old man, after falling 2 meters down an embankment. While there are numerous publications concerning associated MCL tears and other knee ligaments, a combination of MCL tear with a patellar tendon rupture is very rare. In addition, our case presents the first case recorded in the literature, involving both knees of a patient. The clinical case is described and discussed following a review of the literature. The symmetrical knee injury was treated with a primary direct repair of the MCL tears and using a suture anchor fixation of the patellar tendon ruptures, which was reinforced by a stainless steel wire and an autograft of the ipsilateral quadriceps tendon.

Single-bundle MCL reconstruction with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare knee kinematics and kinetics following either single bundle, modified triangular or double-bundle reconstruction of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Using a cadaveric model (n = 10), the knee kinematics and kinetics following three MCL reconstructions (single-bundle (SB), double-bundle (DB), modified triangular) with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction were compared with the intact and deficient knee state. The knees were tested under (1) an 89-N anterior tibial load, (2) 5 N-m internal and external rotational tibial torques, and (3) a 7 N-m valgus torque.

RESULTS

Anatomic ACL reconstruction with SB MCL reconstruction was able to restore anterior tibial translation and external rotation to intact knee values but failed to the internal and valgus rotatory stability. Anatomical DB MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) and the modified triangular MCL reconstruction (with SB ACL reconstruction) restored all knee kinematics to the intact value.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that clinical presentation with combined ACL and severe sMCL injury, single-bundle MCL with single-bundle ACL reconstruction does not restore knee kinematics. Anatomical double-bundle MCL reconstruction may produce slightly better biomechanical stability than the modified triangular MCL reconstruction, but the modified triangular reconstruction might be more clinically practical with the advantages of being less invasive and technically simpler while at the same time can restore a nearly normal knee joint.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Medial Collateral Ligament, and Posterior Oblique Ligament Reconstruction Through Single Tibial Tunnel Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts

Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries are the most common type of combined ligamentous injury of the knee. The optimal treatment for these combined injuries is controversial. Combined ACL and MCL-posterior oblique ligament (POL) reconstruction avoids late anteromedial rotatory instability and chronic valgus instability of the knee and decreases the increased stress on the ACL graft. Graft choice (hamstring tendon autograft, quadriceps bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, or Achilles tendon allograft) and anatomic restoration of the medial and posteromedial corner of the knee are challenges of this combined reconstruction. This article describes a technique that allows combined ACL and MCL-POL reconstruction. The hamstring tendons from the contralateral limb are tripled and used as the ACL graft. The gracilis tendon from the ipsilateral limb is doubled and used as the MCL-POL graft. The semitendinosus tendon of the ipsilateral limb is preserved. After ACL reconstruction, the MCL-POL graft is suspended on the ACL graft at the distal end of the tibial tunnel and the graft limbs are used for open reconstruction of the MCL and POL. Three interference screws (Arthrex, Naples, FL) and 1 metal staple are used for graft fixation of this combined reconstruction.

Ultrasound-Guided Suture Tape Augmentation and Stabilization of the Medial Collateral Ligament

Management of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries usually consists of time and conservative management; however, patients are typically immobilized and need extensive time to return to sport. Although the MCL has been shown to have the ability to heal given time, surgical management is still sometimes needed to provide stability to the knee. Operative techniques vary in methodology, but are typically highly invasive and technically demanding. In the event of multiligamentous or severe injuries, reinforcing the MCL with an ultrahigh-strength, 2-mm-wide suture tape allows for early functional rehabilitation, permitting the native MCL tissue to heal and avoiding late reconstructions. This technical report details an ultrasound-guided technique for the percutaneous suture tape augmentation and stabilization of the MCL with or without repair. Ultrasound allows for anatomic percutaneous placement of the sockets, as opposed to landmark palpation guidance that has proven to be unreliable. This is a simple, quick procedure that provides instant stability to the MCL with or without operating on the ligament itself, allowing patients to return to activity faster with the reduced risk of reinjury due to less muscle atrophy and loss of function.

Medial collateral ligament reconstruction is necessary to restore anterior stability with anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics and graft forces in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction combined with one of two superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) reconstruction techniques (parallel or triangular vector sMCL reconstruction).

METHODS

Twenty porcine knees were divided into two groups (n = 20), parallel or triangular vector sMCL reconstruction, with both groups having anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. The knees were tested under (1) an 89-N anterior tibial load, (2) 4 Nm internal and external rotational tibial torques, and (3) a 7 Nm valgus torque.

RESULTS

With ACL/sMCL co-injuries, single-bundle ACL reconstruction alone does not restore anterior, valgus, and internal stability. Triangular vector sMCL reconstruction better restored anterior stability, and parallel sMCL reconstruction better restored valgus stability.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that single-bundle ACL reconstruction alone was not able to restore anterior tibial translation, valgus rotation, and external rotation of the intact knee with combined ACL and sMCL injuries and sMCL reconstruction was also required. The combined ACL and parallel sMCL reconstruction better restored valgus and external rotation stability, while the combined ACL and triangular vector method better restored anterior tibial translation. With combined ACL and severe sMCL injury, both ligaments should be reconstructed. The two sMCL reconstruction techniques exhibited slightly different kinematics and graft force; however, there was not enough difference to recommend one over the other.

Primary Repair of the Medial Collateral Ligament With Internal Bracing

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is commonly injured in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Because the MCL has better healing capacity than the ACL, the general perception is that MCL injuries can be treated conservatively. Treating these injuries conservatively, however, can lead to residual valgus laxity. Furthermore, it delays time to surgery, which prevents acute treatment of concomitant ACL injuries using primary repair or acute reconstruction. Several treatment methods for MCL injuries have been proposed, including primary repair, augmented repair with autograft tissue, or primary reconstruction. In this surgical technique article, we present the technique of acute primary MCL repair with internal bracing with 2 limited incisions. With this technique, early surgical intervention is possible, and early rehabilitation is safe because of the internal bracing. Advantages include fast recovery, avoidance of muscle atrophy because of early mobilization, prevention of residual valgus instability, and maintenance of proprioception.

Permanent knee sensorimotor system changes following ACL injury and surgery

The cruciate ligaments are components of the knee capsuloligamentous system providing vital neurosensory and biomechanical function. Since most historical primary ACL repair attempts were unsuccessful, reconstruction has become the preferred surgery. However, an increased understanding of the efficacy of lesion-site scaffolding, innovative suturing methods and materials, and evolving use of biological healing mediators such as platelet-rich plasma and stem cells has prompted reconsideration of what was once believed to be impossible. A growing number of in vivo animal studies and prospective clinical studies are providing increasing support for this intervention. The significance of ACL repair rather than reconstruction is that it more likely preserves the native neurosensory system, entheses, and ACL footprints. Tissue preservation combined with restored biomechanical function increases the likelihood for premorbid neuromuscular control system and dynamic knee stability recovery. This recovery should increase the potential for more patients to safely return to sports at their desired intensity and frequency. This current concepts paper revisits cruciate ligament neurosensory and neurovascular anatomy from the perspective of knee capsuloligamentous system function. Peripheral and central nerve pathways and central cortical representation mapping are also discussed. Surgical restoration of a more physiologically sound knee joint may be essential to solving the osteoarthritis dilemma. Innovative rehabilitative strategies and outcome measurement methodologies using more holistic and clinically relevant measurements that closely link biomechanical and neurosensory characteristics of physiological ACL function are discussed. Greater consideration of task-specific patient physical function and psychobehavioral links should better delineate the true efficacy of all ACL surgical and non-surgical interventions. Level of evidence IV.

Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years After Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Partial-Thickness Quadriceps Tendon-Bone Autograft

This study reports outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after a technique using quadriceps tendon-bone autograft for medial collateral ligament reconstruction. This technique effectively restored medial stability in medial collateral ligament-deficient knees. It is particularly valuable when nonirradiated allograft is unavailable or harvesting medial knee restraints (semitendinosus) for medial collateral ligament reconstruction is to be avoided. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e557-e562.].

Acute MCL and ACL injuries: first results of minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with combined ACL single-bundle reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is an on-going discussion whether to operatively treat combined grade II and III lesions of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the acute phase rather than conservative treatment of the MCL lesion with a delayed unitary ACL replacement. Another issue is the question how to technically address these MCL lesions. The aim of this study was, therefore, to analyze the results of simultaneous ACL replacement (hamstrings) in a single-bundle technique with a simultaneous MCL ligament bracing procedure.

METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized trial,, 16 patients were included with grade II and III lesions of the MCL. Surgical treatment was performed within 14 days (mean 10.4 days, SD ±2.3 days) by one single expert orthopedic surgeon using the semitendinosus tendon and Rigidfix® system for femoral and tibial fixation and 3.5 mm screws with one 1.3 mm PDS Cord for minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with screw fixation. Knee stability was measured with the Rolimeter® and KT-1000®. MCL stability was assessed in clinically and radiographically with valgus stress projections.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 36.4 with six female and ten male patients. There were no surgical complications such as infections or healing disturbances. Mean operation time was 64 ± 6 min. The arthrofibrosis rate was 0 %. Medial knee stability was normal in full extension for all cases with no intra-individual side-to-side difference. Radiological assessed MCL stability revealed Δ values with a mean of 1.1 ± 1.3 mm compared to the contra-lateral side. The Lachman Test revealed a side-to-side difference of 1.6 mm with the KT-1000® and 2.6 ± 0.9 mm when measured with the Rolimeter®. Subjective clinical assessment revealed good results with a mean Lysholm Score of 89.1 points.

CONCLUSION

Acute ACL replacement and MCL ligament bracing with this novel technique revealed in this study good clinical results and objective restored knee stability without cases of knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis. The remarkable shortcoming is the small cohort number making further studies necessary.

Medial collateral ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft for chronic medial knee instability combined with multi-ligament injuries: a new technique

BACKGROUND

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the main static stabilizer of the medial knee. The surgical treatment was recommended in cases with serious medial collateral ligament insufficiency combined with multi-ligament injuries and chronic symptomatic medial instability. Several surgical techniques have been described for the MCL reconstruction, while potential problems including donor site morbidity, complicated procedure, and high risk of femoral tunnel collision were reported. In order to minimize such potential limitations, we describe a new medial reconstruction technique for MCL injury using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft.

METHODS

A longitudinal incision at the medial knee was made. The centers of femoral and tibial attachments were gained through repeated isometricity test. Then, the bone grooves were made around the femoral and tibial centers. The appropriate BPTB allograft was selected, and both ends were trimmed. The prepared bone blocks were embedded into the grooves and fixed with cancellous screws. The programmed rehabilitation exercises were performed after the operation.

RESULTS

A strong graft and bone-to-bone healing on both femoral and tibial attachment sites were obtained, and femoral tunnel collision during multi-ligament reconstruction was avoided. Satisfactory valgus and rotatory stability were gained.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel MCL reconstruction technique using BPTB allograft can be safely performed, and the clinical outcome was favorable with satisfactory valgus and rotatory stability. More cases and additional follow-up results are needed to verify the overall effect of this technique.

Collagen fibre and fibril ultrastructural arrangement of the superficial medial collateral ligament in the human knee

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the collagen fibre ultrastructural arrangement and collagen fibril diameters in the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) in the human knee. Considering sMCL's distinctive functions at different angles of knee flexion, it was hypothesized a significant difference between the collagen fibril diameters of each portion of the sMCL.

METHODS

Fourteen sMCL from seven fresh males (by chance because of the availability) cadavers (median age 40 years, range 34-59 years) were harvested within 12 h of death. sMCLs were separated into two orders of regions for analysis. The first order (divisions) was anterior, central and posterior. Thereafter, each division was split into three regions (femoral, intermediate and tibial), generating nine portions. One sMCL from each cadaver was used for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and morphometric analyses, whereas the contralateral sMCL was processed for light microscopy (LM) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

LM and SEM analyses showed a complex tridimensional architecture, with the presence of wavy collagen fibres or crimps. TEM analysis showed significant differences in median collagen fibril diameter among portions inside the anterior, central and posterior division of the sMCL (p < 0.0001 within each division). Significant differences were also present among the median [interquartile range] collagen fibril diameters of anterior (39.4 [47.8-32.9]), central (38.5 [44.4-34.0]) and posterior (41.7 [52.2-35.4]) division (p = 0.0001); femoral (38.2 [45.0-32.7]), intermediate (40.3 [47.3-36.1]) and tibial (40.7 [55.0-32.2]) region (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Human sMCL showed a complex architecture that allows restraining different knee motions at different angles of knee flexion. The posterior division of sMCL accounted for the largest median collagen fibril diameter. The femoral region of sMCL accounted for the smallest median collagen fibril diameter. The presence of crimps in the medial collateral ligament, previously identified in the rat, was confirmed in humans (taking into consideration differences between these two species).

Surgical Techniques for the Reconstruction of Medial Collateral Ligament and Posteromedial Corner Injuries of the Knee: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review reconstruction techniques of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and associated medial structures of the knee (e.g., posterior oblique ligament).

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline/PubMed Database (1966 to November 2013), reference list scanning and citation searches of included articles, and manual searches of high-impact journals (2000 to July 2013) and conference proceedings (2009 to July 2013) were performed to identify publications describing MCL reconstruction techniques of the knee. Exclusion criteria included (1) MCL primary repair techniques or advancement procedures, (2) lack of clear description of MCL reconstruction technique, (3) animal models, (4) nonrelevant study design, (5) and foreign language articles without available translation.

RESULTS

After review of 4,600 references, 25 publications with 359 of 388 patients (92.5%) were isolated for analysis, including 18 single-bundle MCL and 10 double-bundle reconstruction techniques. Only 2 techniques were classified as anatomic reconstructions, and clinical and objective outcomes (n = 28; 100% <3 mm side-to-side difference [SSD]) were superior to those with nonanatomic reconstruction (n = 182; 79.1% <3 mm SSD) and tendon transfer techniques (n = 114; 52.6% <3 mm SSD).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated that numerous medial reconstruction techniques have been used in the treatment of isolated and combined medial knee injuries in the existent literature. Many variations exist among reconstruction techniques and may differ by graft choices, method of fixation, number of bundles, tensioning protocol, and degree of anatomic restoration of medial and posteromedial corner knee restraints. Further studies are required to better ascertain the comparative clinical outcomes with anatomic, non-anatomic, and tendon transfer techniques for medial knee reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies and surgical techniques.

The role of the deep medial collateral ligament in controlling rotational stability of the knee

PURPOSE

The tibial insertion of the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) is frequently sacrificed when the proximal tibial cut is performed during total knee arthroplasty. The role of the dMCL in controlling the knee's rotational stability is still controversial. The aim of this study was to quantify the rotational laxity induced by an isolated lesion of the dMCL as it occurs during tibial preparation for knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

An isolated resection of the deep MCL was performed in 10 fresh-frozen cadaver knees. Rotational laxity was measured during application of a standard 5.0 N.m rotational torque. Maximal tibial rotation was measured at different knee flexion angles using an image-guided navigation system (Medivision Surgetics system, Praxim, Grenoble, France) before and after dMCL resection.

RESULTS

In all cases, internal and external tibial rotation increased after dMCL resection. Total rotational laxity increased significantly for all knee flexion angles, with an average difference of +7.8° (SD 5.7) with the knee in extension, +8.9° (SD 1.9) in 30° flexion, +7° (SD 2.9) in 60° flexion and +5.3° (SD 2.8) in 90° flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacrificing the tibial insertion of the deep MCL increases rotational laxity of the knee by 5°-9°, depending on the knee flexion angle. Based on our findings, new surgical techniques and implants that preserve the dMCL insertion such as tibial inlay components should be developed. Further clinical evaluations are necessary.

Management of Chronic Combined PCL Medial Posteromedial Instability of the Knee

Currently, there is no collective consensus on the most effective treatment method for medial collateral ligament injuries with or without associated structural deficiencies. An in-depth understanding of relevant anatomic structures and diagnostic tools is critical to determining an appropriate treatment strategy. This article presents an overview for management of chronic combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posteromedial instability of the knee, and the results of treatment within the context of the PCL-based multiple ligament injured knee. Recognition and correction of the varying types of posteromedial instability is the key to successful PCL reconstruction in combined PCL posteromedial instability. Reasons for failure of PCL reconstruction include failure to address associated collateral ligament instability, associated limb malalignment, and improper tunnel position. The principles of reconstruction in the combined PCL posteromedial injured knee are to identify and treat all pathology, accurately place tunnels to approximate ligament anatomic insertion sites, utilize strong graft material, employ mechanical graft tensioning, provide secure graft fixation, and perform a deliberate postoperative rehabilitation program. Results of treatment indicate that multiple techniques of posterior ligament reconstruction and posteromedial reconstruction are successful and return patients functional activity with long-term follow-up.

Simultaneous Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament in Patients With Chronic ACL-MCL Lesions: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

In cases of chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-medial collateral ligament (MCL) lesions, nonoperative treatment of the MCL lesion may lead to chronic valgus instability and rotatory instability. The optimal management for patients who have combined ACL-MCL injuries remains controversial.

PURPOSE

To present a case series of 21 patients who underwent simultaneous ACL-MCL reconstruction with a 2- to 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

From October 2007 to December 2010, a total of 21 patients with chronic ACL-MCL injuries, for which the 2 ligaments were reconstructed during the same surgical procedure, were studied. All patients were available for follow-up for at least 2 years. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee scores, valgus and sagittal stability, anteromedial rotatory stability, range of motion, and complications were assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

At follow-up, valgus and sagittal laxity were not observed in any of the patients. The mean medial knee opening was significantly reduced to 0.80 ± 0.96 mm (range, -1.2 to 2.6 mm) postoperatively compared with 8.0 ± 1.3 mm (range, 6.1 to 10.7 mm) preoperatively (P < .01). The mean postoperative side-to-side difference measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer was reduced to 0.8 ± 0.9 mm (range, -1.2 to 2.3 mm) compared with 8.4 ± 1.6 mm (range, 6.2 to 13.2 mm) preoperatively (P < .01). Preoperative anteromedial instability was seen in 71% of patients (15/21), whereas none of the patients had anteromedial rotatory instability at the last follow-up. The mean IKDC subjective score improved overall from 45.3 ± 12.0 (range, 28.7-69.0) preoperatively to 87.7 ± 8.2 (range, 65.5-100.0) at the last follow-up (P < .01). Most patients (20/21) had normal or nearly normal range of motion of the knee joint; only 1 patient (5%) had a limitation of flexion of 15° compared with the contralateral knee at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic ACL-MCL lesions, simultaneous reconstruction of the ACL and MCL can significantly improve the medial, sagittal, and rotatory stability of the knee at short-term follow-up.

Tibial inlay reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament using Achilles tendon allograft for the treatment of medial instability of the knee

Although various surgical procedures have been described for the medical collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction, none can accurately reestablish its original anatomy and orientation. The purpose of this study was to present a technique restoring the anatomy and stability of the medial knee with an Achilles tendon allograft using a tibial inlay technique. The bone block was fixed into a cancellous trough created on the medial surface of the tibia with a cancellous screw and washer, while the tendinous portion was fixed into the femoral insertion site of the superficial MCL with a bioabsorbable interference screw. This technique can successfully reproduce the native anatomy and orientation of the MCL.

[Acute medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: diagnostics and therapy]

The medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) is the most commonly damaged ligamentous stabilizer of the human knee. The diagnostic algorithm comprises patient history, clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is important to distinguish between incomplete and complete ruptures of the MCL. For adequate treatment the classification and exact knowledge about concomitant injuries are important. A nonoperative treatment of incomplete ruptures (grades I and II) is widely accepted and usually results in a good clinical outcome but the treatment of complete ruptures (grade III) is a subject of controversy. Complete intraligamentous ruptures with a correct approximation of the stumps and intact dorsomedial joint capsule can also be treated nonoperatively with good and excellent results. In contrast, ruptures close to the abutment and bony avulsions tend to heal better through operative treatment. Dehiscence or dislocation of the ligament stumps in MRI is an indication for operative treatment. In the context of a multiligamentous injury or complex instability, the majority of authors suggest an operative stabilization. As the treatment of chronic instability can be challenging, the initial and adequate treatment of acute ruptures is of great importance.

[Minimally invasive augmentation of the medial collateral ligament with autologous hamstring tendons in chronic knee instability]

OBJECTIVE

Medial collateral ligament reconstruction in chronic unstable knees.

INDICATIONS

Chronic instability of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) isolated or in combination with multiligament injuries.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Refixable bony avulsions, limited range of motion, arthrofibrosis, severe valgus deformity, infections, critical soft tissue, lack of patient compliance and open growth plates.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Harvesting of the contralateral semitendinosus tendon and preparation. Supine position with leg in electric leg holder. Oblique skin incision above the pes anserinus parallel to the tendons. Placement of drill hole distal to the tibial insertion of the hamstrings in the footprint of the MCL. Tapering and fixation of the transplant. Subfascial tunneling and femoral fixation of the transplant distally to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) origin in 30° flexion under fluoroscopic control. Tibial fixation of the dorsal portion of the transplant (POL) ventral to the semimembranosus tendon footprint in full extension.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Limited weight bearing with 20 kg for 4-6 weeks, stabilizing brace with limited range of motion 0/0/90°.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients with a median age of 39 (18-70) years received an augmentation of the MCL complex due to a chronic instability using the described technique. Follow-up examination was performed after 16 (11-56) months. All patients reported a stable knee. The median value of the Lysholm score at follow-up was 90 (72-96) points and the Tegner score prior to trauma was 4 (2-6) points and 3 (2-6) points during follow-up. No grade 2 or 3 instability could be observed during follow-up. There were no complications using the above mentioned technique.