Anatomic repair and ligament bracing as an alternative treatment option for acute combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial or posterolateral corner-results of a multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

Combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial/-lateral corner (PMC/PLC) usually require surgical management. Literature shows controversy regarding the standards of treatment. Suture-augmented repair leads to excellent results in acute knee dislocations but has not been investigated clinically in combined PCL injuries. The purpose of this multicentre study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of this technique in acute combined PCL injuries.

MATERIALS & METHODS

N = 33 patients with acute combined PCL injuries involving the PMC/PLC were treated by one-stage suture repair with ligament bracing of the PCL and suture repair of the accompanying PMC/PLC injuries with/without ligament bracing or primary augmentation by semitendinosus autograft. Outcome was assessed by IKDC questionnaire, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale and KOOS. Additional PCL stress-radiography was performed.

RESULTS

N = 31 patients with combined PCL injuries (female: male = 7:24; age 39.1 ± 13.8 years) with a follow-up of 16.8 ± 9.6 months were finally evaluated. 18 had PMC injuries, 13 PLC injuries. 32.2% presented with accompanying meniscal tears (70% medial meniscus). 19.4% showed cartilage injuries grade III-IV. Complications included one infection and four knee stiffnesses. Three had symptomatic postoperative instability, all affiliated to the PLC group. The IKDC was 69.8 ± 16.5, Lysholm score 85 ± 14.4 and KOOS 89.7 ± 8.1. Median loss of activity (Tegner) was 0.89 ± 1.31. Comparing PMC and PLC, all scores showed a tendency towards more favourable outcomes in the PMC group (n.s.). Stress-radiography showed an overall side-to-side difference of 3.7 ± 3.8 mm. Subgroup evaluation showed statistically significant better results (p = 0.035) of PMC (2.5 ± 1.5 mm) versus PLC (5.8 ± 5.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage suture repair with ligament bracing is a viable technique for acute combined PCL injuries and predominantly leads to good and excellent clinical outcomes. Patients with PLC injuries show a tendency towards inferior outcomes and higher instability rates compared to PMC injuries. These results may help in therapy planning and counselling patients with these rare injury pattern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option-results of a multicentre study

PURPOSE

The literature shows no consensus regarding the best method and timing for the treatment of acute knee dislocations. Studies indicate that a one-stage procedure performed in the early stages of injury can lead to superior results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after performing early surgical repair with additional suture augmentation (ligament bracing) of all torn ligaments in acute knee dislocations.

METHODS

In this prospective multicentre study, 73 patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation were treated with one-stage ligament bracing within 10 days. Twenty-six patients sustained a type III medial dislocation, thirty-nine patients sustained a type III lateral dislocation, and eight patients presented a type IV dislocation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Within the follow-up evaluation, various scores were collected (International Knee Documentation Committee IKDC Score, Tegner Score and Lysholm Score). Additional stress radiography was performed (Telos™) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine knee dislocations (Schenck III and IV) with a follow-up at a mean of 14 ± 1.6 months were evaluated. The average IKDC score was 75.5 ± 14.5, the average Lysholm score was 81.0 ± 15.5, and the median loss of activity in the Tegner score was 1 (range 0-3) point. Stress radiographs showed side-to-side differences at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.3 mm for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of 2.9 ± 2.1 mm for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The operative revision rate (early and late) was 17.4%. In the early stage, one wound infection and one case of transient common peroneal nerve (CPN) paresis were successfully revised. In the later stage, four patients with knee stiffness and six cases with symptomatic knee instability needed reoperation. Patients without ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations or CPN showed good or excellent results in 87.5% according to the Lysholm score.

CONCLUSION

In cases of acute knee dislocation, primary ACL and PCL transosseous sutures with additional suture augmentation predominantly lead to good and excellent clinical results. Obese patients sustaining ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations and patients following injury to the CPN show inferior outcomes. In patients without ULV and CPN intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 10.1%. The obtained results and revision rates show that early primary suture repair is a promising option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective multicentre study, II.

[Lateral ankle ligament bracing]

OBJECTIVE

Covering the anatomic reconstruction (Broström procedure) with suture tape for more initial stability. Seat belt principle.

INDICATIONS

Mechanical lateral ankle instability: athletes in sports at risk, patients with uncertain compliance with respect to the postoperative treatment regimen, patients with poor tissue quality, patients with generalized laxity, and patients with failed previous repairs.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Known implant intolerance, local or systemic infection, local soft tissue affections, hemorrhagic disorders.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Epimalleolar 5 cm skin incision. Anatomic repair of the lateral capsuloligamentous structures to the anterior facet of the lateral malleolus (e.g. Broström repair). Dissection down to origin and insertion of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). Close proximal (fibula) and distal (talar neck) to the ATFL attachments to bone a 2.7 mm (fibular) and a 3.4 mm (talar) drill hole is created and taped with the respective tapes from the single use kit (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Placement of a 3.5 mm × 15.8 mm BioComposite SwiveLock® screw, preloaded with suture tape into the fibula. The free ends of this suture tape are inserted into a 4.75 mm × 19.1 mm SwiveLock® anchor, which is screwed into the talar drill hole under moderate tension of the suture tapes.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Immobilization for 4-5 days postoperatively in a leg and foot Scotchcast^TM. Then, full load bearing within 1-2 days in a stable shoe (OrthoTECH Stabil, OrthoTECH GmbH, Stockdorf, Germany) for 5 postoperative weeks for the day and a night splint (existing Scotchcast^TM). Sensorimotor training initiated in the third and running in the eighth postoperative week. Return to competition in sports at risk (football, basketball, volleyball) 10-12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Measured with the validated FAAM-G (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-German version) questionnaire, 9 patients had a preoperative activities of daily living subscale median (minimum-maximum) of 65 (30-100) and increased to 98 (78-100) 12 months postoperatively. Preoperative FAAM-G sport subscale results were 35 (0-75) and 100 (19-100) after 12 months. With the Sefton Grading System, 7 of 8 followed patients had an excellent result and had unrestricted ankle mobility and stable ankles (talar tilt and anterior talar drawer), which is comparable to published suture tape augmentation reports.

Acute MCL and ACL injuries: first results of minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with combined ACL single-bundle reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is an on-going discussion whether to operatively treat combined grade II and III lesions of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the acute phase rather than conservative treatment of the MCL lesion with a delayed unitary ACL replacement. Another issue is the question how to technically address these MCL lesions. The aim of this study was, therefore, to analyze the results of simultaneous ACL replacement (hamstrings) in a single-bundle technique with a simultaneous MCL ligament bracing procedure.

METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized trial,, 16 patients were included with grade II and III lesions of the MCL. Surgical treatment was performed within 14 days (mean 10.4 days, SD ±2.3 days) by one single expert orthopedic surgeon using the semitendinosus tendon and Rigidfix® system for femoral and tibial fixation and 3.5 mm screws with one 1.3 mm PDS Cord for minimal-invasive MCL ligament bracing with screw fixation. Knee stability was measured with the Rolimeter® and KT-1000®. MCL stability was assessed in clinically and radiographically with valgus stress projections.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 36.4 with six female and ten male patients. There were no surgical complications such as infections or healing disturbances. Mean operation time was 64 ± 6 min. The arthrofibrosis rate was 0 %. Medial knee stability was normal in full extension for all cases with no intra-individual side-to-side difference. Radiological assessed MCL stability revealed Δ values with a mean of 1.1 ± 1.3 mm compared to the contra-lateral side. The Lachman Test revealed a side-to-side difference of 1.6 mm with the KT-1000® and 2.6 ± 0.9 mm when measured with the Rolimeter®. Subjective clinical assessment revealed good results with a mean Lysholm Score of 89.1 points.

CONCLUSION

Acute ACL replacement and MCL ligament bracing with this novel technique revealed in this study good clinical results and objective restored knee stability without cases of knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis. The remarkable shortcoming is the small cohort number making further studies necessary.