Variability of the location of the tibial tubercle affects the rotational alignment of the tibial component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Tibia rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Delphi consensus statements from European Knee Society (EKS)

Rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for ensuring optimal tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint function. Proper alignment minimizes the risk of tibiofemoral mismatch and patellofemoral instability, which can lead to increased joint stress and compromised kinematics. Traditionally, the tibial tubercle axis (TTA) has been the primary landmark for alignment. However, recent insights into knee three-dimensional anatomy reveal significant variability in TTA positioning, challenging its reliability. This study employs a Delphi consensus methodology among European Knee Society (EKS) experts to address key questions regarding tibial rotational alignment in TKA. Through a systematic literature review and expert discussions, a strong consensus was achieved on three main points: (1) optimal alignment should target both the perpendicularity of the anteroposterior tibial axis to the femoral flexion/extension axis and the accurate positioning of the tibial tubercle relative to the femoral trochlea; (2) while the TTA is effective in 70% of cases, its variability in 30% of knees necessitates alternative strategies; (3) current computer-assisted and robotic technologies do not significantly enhance alignment outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized assessment of rotational deformities and highlight the potential of advanced data analytics to improve future alignment strategies. The consensus underscores the complexity of achieving optimal tibial alignment and the need for continued research to refine surgical techniques and technologies.

Coronal Knee Alignment and Tibial Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients with End-Stage Osteoarthritis

Several studies have found a relationship between the rotational anatomy of the distal femur and the overall coronal lower limb alignment in knees with osteoarthritis (OA). Less is known about the rotation of the proximal tibia, especially in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), where one of the goals of the surgery is to achieve the appropriate component-to-component rotation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the coronal alignment of the lower extremity and the relative proximal tibial rotation. A prospective cohort study of patients with an end-stage OA scheduled for TKA was conducted. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and a standing X-ray of both lower limbs. A relative femorotibial rotation was measured separately for mechanical and kinematic alignment. A statistically significant correlation was found between the tibial varus and the external tibial rotation (p < 0.001). Out of 14 knees with high tibial varus (>5°), 13 (93%) and 7 (50%) knees had >10° of femorotibial rotation for the mechanical and kinematic alignment landmarks, respectively. In order to keep the component-to-component rotation within the 10° margin, more internal rotation of the tibial component is required in knees with higher tibial varus.

The use of virtual reality to assess the bony landmarks at the knee joint - The role of imaging modality and the assessor's experience

BACKGROUND

At present, extended reality technologies such as virtual reality (VR) have gained popularity in orthopedic surgery. The first aim of this study was to assess the precision of VR and other imaging modalities - computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - to localize bony landmarks near the knee joint. Secondly, the impact of the educational level of the assessor - medical master students, orthopedic residents, and orthopedic surgeons - on the precision with which landmarks near the knee joint could be localized was analyzed.

METHODS

We included a total of 77 participants: 62 medical master students, 10 orthopedic residents, and 5 orthopedic surgeons to analyze three cadaver legs. Every participant localized a series of sixteen bony landmarks on six different imaging modalities (CT, MRI, 3D-CT, 3D-MRI, VR-CT, VR-MRI).

RESULTS

Concerning the imaging modality, the inter- and intra-observer variability were lowest for 3D and VR, higher for MRI (respectively 7.6 mm and 6.9 mm), and highest for CT (respectively 9 mm and 8.7 m).Concerning the educational level of the assessor, inter- and intra-observer variability in VR were lowest for surgeons, (respectively 3.2 mm and 3.6 mm), higher for residents (respectively 5.9 mm and 6.5 mm) and medical students (respectively 5.9 mm and 5.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

VR can be considered a reliable imaging technique. Localization of landmarks tends to be more precise in VR and on 3D than on conventional CT and MRI images. Furthermore, orthopedic surgeons localize landmarks more precisely than orthopedic residents and medical students in VR.

Curve-on-curve technique does not improve tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty in comparison to tibial tuberosity technique with use of anatomical implants: randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

During the last years, main attention while performing total knee replacement was paid to femoral component alignment; however, there is still lack of studies concerning tibial baseplate rotational alignment, especially in terms of anatomical designs of knee prosthesis. Some recent studies proved that tibial baseplate malrotation might be a cause of knee pain and patients' dissatisfaction. The aim of this study was to compare tibial component rotation and its coverage on the tibial plateau achieved with curve-on-curve and tibial tuberosity techniques (t-t technique) with use of anatomic knee designs with asymmetric tibial baseplate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo total knee arthroplasty with use of the PERSONA PS (Zimmer Biomet) knee design with an asymmetric baseplate. The rotation of the tibial component was assessed and performed with two different techniques: curve-on-curve technique and tibial tuberosity technique. Tibial component rotation was measured on computed tomography (CT) scans using the method suggested by Benazzo et al. and designed for asymmetrical implants. For the measurement of the tibial bone coverage, the component surface area was outlined and measured on a proper CT section, then the tibial cut surface area was outlined and measured on a section just below the cement level. Pre- and post-operative range of motion was measured by another independent researcher 12 months post-operatively during follow-up visit.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in median value of tibial rotation angle: 7° (interquartile range (IQR) = 0-12) in curve-on-curve technique group vs 2° (IQR-1-7) in tibial tuberosity technique group, probability value (p) = 0.0041, with values above 0 meaning external rotation of the component. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of range of motion (ROM) with average values of 124.3° ± 13.0° for curve-on-curve technique and 125.6° ± 12.8° for t-t technique with p = 0.45. There was a statistically insignificant difference between both groups in terms of coverage percentage in slight favor for curve-on-curve technique (85.9 ± 4.2 vs 84.5 ± 4.8, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

In this study, no difference between the groups in terms of tibial bone coverage and range of motion was proved, even though both techniques differed significantly with values of tibial rotation. Future studies should be focused on influence of specific values of tibial rotation on patient-reported outcomes and survivorship of anatomic knee implants.

Which Asymmetric Tibial Component Is Optimally Designed for Calipered Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Calipered kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) restores the patient's prearthritic joint lines and sets internal-external rotation of the tibial component parallel to the flexion-extension (FE) plane, which is not a mechanical alignment (MA) target. Two asymmetric tibial components designed for MA set the tibial component to either a femoral component (FC) target or a tibial tubercle (TT) target. The study determined the optimal asymmetric tibial component to use with KA as the one with smaller IE deviation from the MA target, greater coverage of tibial resection, and lower incidence of cortical overhang. The study included 40 patients treated with bilateral calipered KA TKA with different asymmetric tibial components in opposite knees. A best-fit of a kinematic tibial template to the tibial resection set the template's slot parallel to the knee's FE plane. Each asymmetric tibial component's anterior-posterior (AP) axis was set parallel to the slot. Computer tomography analysis determined the IE deviation (-internal/+ external) of each tibial component from its MA target, tibial resection coverage by the baseplate and insert, and incidence of cortical overhang. The patient-reported Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) determined outcomes. The mean IE deviation from the MA target was 2 degrees external for the FC-target asymmetric tibial component and -8 degrees internal for the TT-target asymmetric tibial component (p < 0.001). Tibial resection coverage by the baseplate (insert) was 88% (84%) for the FC target and 84% (79%) for the TT target (p < 0.001 for baseplate and insert). The FC target insert covered 3 mm more of the posterolateral resection (p < 0.001). Posteromedial coverage was comparable. The incidence of cortical overhang was 2.5% for each baseplate. There was no difference in FJS and OKS. When performing calipered KA, the more optimal design was the asymmetric tibial component with the FC target because of the smaller deviation from its MA target and the greater coverage of the tibial resection by the baseplate and insert.

Different tibial rotational axes can be applied in combination according to the tibial tuberosity-posterior cruciate ligament distance in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance is representative of the true lateralization of tibial tuberosity in isolation and its influence on the accuracy of the Akagi line and medial third of the tibial tuberosity (MTTT).

Methods

A total of 135 osteoarthritis patients with varus knees who undergoing computed tomography scans were enrolled to establish three-dimension models of the knees. Tibial width (TW), tibial tuberosity lateralization (TTL), posterior cruciate ligament lateralization (PCLL), knee rotation angle (KRA) and tibial rotational axes were measured and investigated their correlations with TT-PCL distance. Based on the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the influence of TT-PCL distance on the distributions of mismatch angles of tibial rotational axes was investigated with a safe zone (-5° to 10°).

Results

TT-PCL distance was in significantly positive correlation with TW (r = 0.493; P < 0.001) and TTL (r = 0.378; P < 0.001) which was different with PCLL (r = 0.147; P = 0.009) and KRA (r = -0.166; P = 0.054). All tibial rotational axes were significantly positively correlated with TT-PCL distance (P < 0.001). The mismatch angles between the vertical line of the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) and the Akagi line and MTTT were -1.7° ± 5.3° and 7.6° ± 5.6° respectively. In terms of the optimal cut-off value of 19 mm for TT-PCL distance, the Akagi line applied as tibial rotational axis ensures 87.3% of the positions of tibial components within the safe zone when TT-PCL distance > 19 mm, and MTTT ensures 83.3% when TT-PCL distance ≤ 19 mm.

Conclusion

TT-PCL distances cannot reflect the true lateralization of tibial tuberosity in isolation but can aid in the combination of the Akagi line and MTTT in varus knees. The patients with TT-PCL distance > 19 mm are recommended to reference the Akagi line for tibial rotational alignment. MTTT is recommended to the patients with TT-PCL distance ≤ 19 mm. The study will aid surgeons in deciding which reference may be used by measuring TT-PCL distance using a preoperative CT.

The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance does not truly reflect the lateralization of the tibial tubercle

PURPOSE

The role of the tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) in recurrent patellar instability (RPI) remains unclear. This study aims to confirm the validity of the TT-TG and TT-PCL in predicting RPI and to verify whether the TT-PCL can truly reflect the lateralization of the tibial tubercle.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with RPI and 50 controls were recruited and underwent magnetic resonance imaging examinations. The TT-TG, TT-PCL, and tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL) were measured independently by two authors in a blinded and randomized fashion. T-test was used for parametric variances and the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used for non-parametric variances. Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between the defined measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the reliability of the measurements.

RESULTS

All defined measurements showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. The TT-TG distance, TT-PCL distance, and TTL were significantly greater in the PI group than in the control group. The AUC was highest for the TT-TG distance compared with that for the TT-PCL distance, and TTL were 0.798, 0.764, and 0.769, with the calculated cut-off value of 12.5 mm, 16.5 mm, and 66.1 percentages. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.595) between the TT-TG distance and TTL, and a weak correlation (r = 0.430) between the TT-PCL distance and TTL.

CONCLUSION

Both the TT-TG distance and TT-PCL distance can be measured with excellent reliability on magnetic resonance imaging. The TT-TG distance, rather than the TT-PCL distance, has a better performance in predicting RPI. Most interestingly, the TT-PCL distance cannot reflect the real lateralization of TT. This study provides new information to evaluate TTL in patients with RPI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Different rotational alignment of tibial component should be selected for varied tibial tubercle locations in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to identify how the accuracy of the tibial rotation reference axes varied in populations with different tibial tubercle locations. We hypothesized that the accuracy of the axes of tibial rotation would be affected by the changes of tibial tubercle locations.

METHODS

Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), medial third of the patellar tendon (1/3MPT), medial third of the tibial tuberosity (1/3MTT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (MTT) and Akagi line were drawn. The angle between SEA and horizontal line with the angle between the four tibial rotation axes and the horizontal line was compared by T test. Then, the correlation between TTTG with the angles between the four axes and SEA vertical lines was analyzed. The TTTG was divided into three subgroups (TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, TTTG ≥ 15 mm), then t test was performed for the angles between the vertical lines of the SEA and the four rotation axes of the tibia in each group.

RESULTS

Among the four tibial rotation axes, only the difference between MTT and the line perpendicular to SEA had no statistical significance (NS.). The four tibial rotational axes were all positively correlated with TTTG (p < 0.001). When TTTG ≥ 15 mm, Akagi line was 2.5° ± 6.9°internally rotated to the line perpendicular to SEA, while the 1/3MPT and MTT was 0.9° ± 5.3°and 1.3° ± 5.9°externally rotated to the line perpendicular to the SEA when TTTG < 10 mm and 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MTT showed the best consistency with SEA. TT-TG had a significant positive correlation with all four tibial rotational axes. In patients with TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm and TTTG ≥ 15 mm, the 1/3MPT, MTT and Akagi line demonstrated good alignment consistency with SEA, respectively.

Gender differences affect the location of the patellar tendon attachment site for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of referring different locations of the patellar tendon attachment site and the geometrical center of the osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment and observe the influences of gender differences on the results.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of 135 osteoarthritis patients (82 females and 53 males) with varus deformity was obtained to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) models preoperatively. The medial boundary, medial one-sixth, and medial one-third of the patellar tendon attachment site were marked on the tibia. These points were projected on the tibial osteotomy plane and connected to the geometrical center (GC) of the osteotomy plane or the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to construct six tibial rotational axes (Akagi line, MBPT, MSPT1, MSPT2, MTPT1 and MTPT2). The mismatch angle between the vertical line of the SEA projected on the proximal tibial osteotomy surface and six different reference axes was measured. In additional, the effect of gender differences on rotational alignment for tibial component were assessed.

Results

Relative to the SEA, rotational mismatch angles were − 1.8° ± 5.1° (Akagi line), − 2.5° ± 5.3° (MBPT), 2.8° ± 5.3° (MSPT1), 4.5° ± 5.4° (MSPT2), 7.3° ± 5.4° (MTPT1), and 11.6° ± 5.8° (MTPT2) for different tibial rotational axes in all patients. All measurements differed significantly between the male and female. The tibial rotational axes with the least mean absolute deviation for the female or male were Akagi line or MSPT, respectively. There was no significant difference in whether the GC of the osteotomy surface or the midpoint of PCL termination was chosen as the posterior anatomical landmark when the medial boundary or medial one-sixth point of the patellar tendon attachment site was selected as the anterior anatomical landmark.

Conclusion

When referring patellar tendon attachment site as anterior anatomical landmarks for tibial rotational alignment, the influence of gender difference on the accuracy needs to be taken into account. The geometric center of the tibial osteotomy plane can be used as a substitute for the middle of the PCL termination when reference the medial boundary or medial one-sixth of the patellar tendon attachment site.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03248-5.

Study on the morphological characteristics and rotational alignment axis of placement plane of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty for hemophilia-related knee arthritis

Background

Abnormal epiphyseal growth plate development of the proximal tibia in hemophilia patients leads to notable morphological changes in the mature knee joint. This study aimed to compare the morphological characteristics of tibial component placement cut surface in patients with hemophilic arthritis (HA) and osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the tibial component rotational alignment axis’ best position for HA patients.

Methods

Preoperative computed tomography scans of 40 OA and 40 HA patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were evaluated using a three-dimensional (3D) software. The tibial component’s placement morphological parameters were measured. The tibial component’s rotational mismatch angles were evaluated, and the most appropriate 0°AP axis position for HA patients was investigated.

Results

In the two groups, the morphology was significantly different in some of the parameters (p < 0.05). The tibial component rotational mismatch angles were significantly different between both groups (p < 0.05). The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon was the point through which 0°AP axis passed for the HA patients. Similarly, the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle was also the point through which the 0°AP axis passed.

Conclusions

The ratio of the anteroposterior length to the geometric transverse length of the placement section of the tibial component in HA patients was smaller than that in OA patients. The medial 9.26° of the medial 1/3 of the patellar tendon or the medial 13.02° of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle seem to be an ideal reference position of the rotational alignment axis of the tibial component for HA patients.

Tibial component rotation alters soft tissue balance in a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Our aim was to understand whether using different landmarks for tibial component rotation influenced articular contact pressures in a balanced total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twelve patients underwent TKA (Triathlon CR, Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ) and contact pressures were assessed using a wireless sensor. Robotic arm assisted TKA using a functional alignment technique was performed, with balanced gaps between medial and lateral compartments. Compartment pressures were measured with the trial tibial component rotated to Akagi's line and to Insall's axis respectively. Rotating the tibial component to Akagi's line resulted in a significantly greater proportion of knees being balanced and lower contact pressures than when the tibial component was rotated to Insall's axis at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion (p < 0.05). Medial compartment pressures were significantly increased in 10° of flexion, as were lateral compartment pressures in all positions when the tibial component was aligned to Insall's axis (p < 0.05). The mean difference in rotation observed with the two landmarks was 6.9° (range 4.1-9.1°). Rotational alignment of the tibial component using Akagi's line reduced contact pressures, improved balance and reduced the need for soft tissue release when compared with Insall's axis in robotic arm assisted TKA.

Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component referring to the tibial tubercle during total knee arthroplasty: the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove can be an aid

Background

There is no consensus on anatomic landmarks or reference axes with which to accurately align rotational position of tibial component. Using the tibial tubercle, commonly referring to the Akagi line and the Insall line, for anatomic reference was widely accepted. However, it is unknown about the predictors that may affect the reliability of using the tibial tubercle for aligning tibial component rotation. The aims of our study were (1) to investigate the reproducibility and accuracy of using the tibial tubercle for aligning tibial component rotation and (2) to determine predictors resulting in discrepancies of the tibial component rotation when referring to the tibial tubercle.

Method

A total of 160 patients with osteoarthritis were recruited before total knee arthroplasty. The angle α formed by the tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis and the Akagi line and the angle β formed by the tibial AP axis and the Insall line were measured to quantify the discrepancies of the Akagi line and the Insall line. Independent variables, including the tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL), and knee rotation angle (KRA), hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and tibial bowing (TB), were measured. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression analysis were calculated to assess relationships between independent variables and the two defined angles.

Results

All defined measurement were available for 140 patients. The Akagi line rotated internally with 1.03° ± 4.25° in regard to the tibial AP axis. The Insall line rotated externally in regard to the tibial AP axis with 7.93° ± 5.36°. Three variables, including TT-TG, TT-PCL, and KRA, tended to be positively correlated with the angle α and the angle β. In terms of a cutoff of TT-TG = 9 mm, 100% cases and 97% cases for using the Akagi line and Insall line, respectively, were located in the defined safe zone (− 5° to 10°).

Conclusion

The tibial tubercle (the Akagi line and Insall line) is found to be a useful and promising anatomic landmark for aligning the tibial component rotation. The TT-TG, with a cutoff value of 9 mm, is helpful to choose the Akagi line or Insall line, alternatively.

Kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The purpose of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Eligible randomized controlled trials regarding the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with KA and MA were included for the analysis.

Results

A total of 1112 participants were included in this study, including 559 participants with KA and 553 patients with MA. This study revealed that the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score (knee and combined), and knee flexion range were better in the patients with kinematic alignment than in the mechanical alignment. In terms of radiological results, the femoral knee angle, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, and joint line orientation angle were significantly different between the two techniques. Perioperatively, the walk distance before discharge was longer in the KA group than in the MA group. In contrast, other functional outcomes, radiological results, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complication rates were similar in both the kinematic and mechanical alignment groups.

Conclusions

The KA technique achieved better functional outcomes than the mechanical technique in terms of KSS (knee and combined), WOMAC scores, and knee flexion range.

PROSPERO trial registration number CRD42021264519. Date registration: July 28, 2021.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03097-2.

The Lateral Knee Radiograph: A Detailed Review

Initial imaging evaluation for a variety of knee pathologies often begins with a radiographic series. Depending on the specific indication, this will include at least two different projections of the knee. In most cases, these are the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the affected knee, and sometimes with the contralateral knee for comparison. Typically, knee pathologies visible on lateral view can also be appreciated on the anteroposterior view. However, several pathologic processes occur in anatomic locations typically obscured on other projections because of superimposed osseous structures. Examples of these pathologies include injuries involving the quadriceps or patellar tendons, avulsion fractures involving anterior or posterior structures, and many soft-tissue injuries. Knowledge of the relevant anatomy and typical pathologies typically visualized on the lateral radiograph of the knee is imperative to avoid overlooking these disease processes.

The personalized Berger method is usable to solve the problem of tibial rotation

Purpose

The revision of any total knee replacement is carried out in a significant number of cases, due to the excessive internal rotation of the tibial component. The goal was to develop a personalized method, using only the geometric parameters of the tibia, without the femoral guidelines, to calculate the postoperative rotational position of tibial component malrotation within a tolerable error threshold in every case.

Methods

Preoperative CT scans of eighty-five osteoarthritic knees were examined by three independent medical doctors twice over 7 weeks.

The geometric centre of the tibia was produced by the ellipse annotation drawn 8 mm below the tibial plateau, the sagittal and frontal axes of the ellipse were transposed to the slice of the tibial tuberosity. With the usage of several guide lines, a right triangle was drawn within which the personalized Berger angle was calculated.

Results

A very good intra-observer (0.89-0.925) and inter-observer (0.874) intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was achieved. Even if the average of the personalized Berger values were similar to the original 18° (18.32° in our case), only 70.6% of the patients are between the clinically tolerable thresholds (12.2° and 23.8°).

Conclusion

The method, measured on the preoperative CT scans, is capable of calculating the required correction during the planning of revision arthroplasties which are necessary due to the tibial component malrotation. The personalized Berger angle isn’t altered during arthroplasty, this way it determines which one of the anterior reference points of the tibia (medial 1/3 or the tip of the tibial tuberosity, medial border or 1/6 or 1/3 or the centre of the patellar tendon) can be used during the positioning of the tibial component.

Level of evidence

Level II, Diagnostic Study (Methodological Study).

Biomechanical Comparison of Kinematic and Mechanical Knee Alignment Techniques in a Computer Simulation Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty Model

Several concepts may be used to restore normal knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. One is a kinematically aligned (KA) technique, which restores the native joint line and limb alignment, and the other is the use of a medial pivot knee (MPK) design, with a ball and socket joint in the medial compartment. This study aimed to compare motions, contact forces, and contact stress between mechanically aligned (MA) and KA (medial tilt 3° [KA3] and 5° [KA5]) models in MPK. An MPK design was virtually implanted with MA, KA3, and KA5 in a validated musculoskeletal computer model of a healthy knee, and the simulation of motion and contact forces was implemented. Anteroposterior (AP) positions, mediolateral positions, external rotation angles of the femoral component relative to the tibial insert, and tibiofemoral contact forces were evaluated at different knee flexion angles. Contact stresses on the tibial insert were calculated using finite element analysis. The AP position at the medial compartment was consistent for all models. From 0° to 120°, the femoral component in KA models showed larger posterior movement at the lateral compartment (0.3, 6.8, and 17.7 mm in MA, KA3, and KA5 models, respectively) and larger external rotation (4.2°, 12.0°, and 16.8° in the MA, KA3, and KA5 models, respectively) relative to the tibial component. Concerning the mediolateral position of the femoral component, the KA5 model was positioned more medially. The contact forces at the lateral compartment of all models were larger than those at the medial compartment at >60° of knee flexion. The peak contact stresses on the tibiofemoral joint at 90° and 120° of knee flexion were higher in the KA models. However, the peak contact stresses of the KA models at every flexion angle were <20 MPa. The KA technique in MPK can successfully achieve near-normal knee kinematics; however, there may be a concern for higher contact stresses on the tibial insert.

A Best-Fit of an Anatomic Tibial Baseplate Closely Parallels the Flexion-Extension Plane and Covers a High Percentage of the Proximal Tibia

There are no reports of in vivo internal-external (I-E) rotational alignment and coverage of the proximal tibia after performing a best-fit method of an anatomically designed and asymmetrically shaped tibial baseplate during calipered kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that a best-fit plane sets the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis of the anatomic baseplate closely parallel to the flexion-extension (F-E) plane of the knee and covers a high percentage of the proximal tibia. A total of 145 consecutive primary TKAs were prospectively collected. The calipered KA method and verification checks set the positions and orientations of the components without ligament release in all knees without restrictions on the preoperative deformities. A best-fit method selected one of six trials of anatomic baseplates that maximized coverage and set I-E rotation parallel to and within the cortical edge of the proximal tibia. The angle between the transverse axes of the components (i.e., the deviation of the A-P axis of the anatomic baseplate from the F-E plane of the native knee) and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the proximal tibia were measured on postoperative computerized tomographic scans. The mean deviation of the anatomic baseplate from the F-E plane was 2-degree external ± 5 degrees. The mean coverage of the proximal tibia was 87 ± 6% (CSA of baseplate from the manufacturer/CSA of proximal tibia × 100). The anatomic baseplate and best-fit method adequately set I-E rotation of the baseplate closely parallel to the F-E plane of the knee and cover a high percentage of the proximal tibia.

Accuracy of intraoperative estimation of femoral stem anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty by using a digital protractor and a spirit level

Background

The femoral component anteversion during surgery is traditionally assessed by a visual assessment of the surgeon and has proven to be imprecise. We sought to determine the accuracy of a digital protractor and a spirit level to measure the stem anteversion during cementless THA.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted among 107 patients (114 hips) who underwent primary cementless THA via posterolateral approach. A pipe with a spirit level was attached to the tibial tubercle and intermalleolar midpoint. While the leg was held perpendicularly to the floor, stem anteversion was estimated by 3 methods: method A by visual assessment; method B by a digital protractor alone; and method C by a digital protractor combined with a spirit level. The angles were compared with the true anteversion measured by postoperative CT scan.

Results

The average anteversion by method C (22.8° ± 6.9°, range -2° to 40°) was significantly lower than method A (24.6° ± 5.2°, range 0° to 30°) (p=0.033), but not different from the true anteversion (22.1° ± 8.2°, range -5.4° to 43.1°) (p=0.445). There were no significant differences between method B (23.2° ± 8.2°, range -4° to 45°) and method A, C or the true anteversion. The mean deviation of the intraoperative estimation from the true anteversion was 0.8° ± 3.7° (range -7.1° to 8.0°) by method C; 1.2° ± 5.1° (range -8.8° to 14.3°) by method B; and 2.5° ± 7.4° (range -19.0° to 16.0°) by method A. Estimation error within 5° was found in 107 hips (93.9%) with method C; 86 hips (75.4%) with method B; and 59 hips (51.8%) with method A.

Conclusion

Accurate estimation of stem anteversion during cementless THA can be determined intraoperatively by the use of a digital protractor and a spirit level.

Trial registration

Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR 20180326003). Registered on 20 March 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Correlation of tibial component size and rotation with outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Tibial component design and positioning contribute more to patient satisfaction than previously realized. A surgeon needs to decide on the size and rotation, bearing in mind that coverage should be as high as possible, whilst malrotation and overhang should be avoided. No study investigates the impact of each of these components on clinical outcomes in a single cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year postoperative outcomes measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, as well as a previously validated rotational CT protocol. Coverage, rotation from Insall's axis, and overhang of an asymmetric tibial baseplate were measured, and positive and negative correlations to clinical outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 499 knees were analyzed. Patient average age was 68.4 years. Rotation within 7° internal and 5° external from Insall's axis was a "safe zone". Mean coverage was 76%. A total of 429 knees (94%) had a coverage of at least 70% and 102 knees (22%) greater than 80%. Overhang was detected in 23% of the cohort. Increased coverage was correlated to increased KOOS score and overhang correlated with a decreased KOOS score (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the individual role of three aspects of tibial component implantation properties in postoperative pain and short-term functional outcomes. Upsizing to the point of overhang with rotational tolerance of 7° internal and 3° external to Insall's axis demonstrates best patient reported outcomes. Overhang decreases the clinical outcome by the same margin as loss of 16% of coverage.

[Progress in the method of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the methods of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty, and provide reference for clinicians to select and further study the methods of tibial prosthesis rotation alignment.

METHODS

The advantages and disadvantages of various tibial prosthesis rotation alignment methods were analyzed and summarized by referring to the relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years.

RESULTS

There are many methods for tibial prosthesis rotation alignment, including reference to relevant anatomical landmarks, range of motion (ROM) technique, computer-assisted navigation, and personalized osteotomy. The inner one-third of the tibial tuberosity is a more accurate reference anatomical landmark, but the obesity, severe knee deformity and dysplasia have impacts on the precise placement of the tibial prosthesis. ROM technique do not need to refer to the anatomical landmark of the tibia, and aren't affected by landmark variation. It can be used for severe knee valgus deformity and the landmarks that are difficult to identify. However, it may cause internal rotation of tibial prosthesis. Computer- assisted navigation and personalized osteotomy can achieve more accurate alignment in sagittal, coronal, and rotational alignment of femoral prosthesis. However, due to the lack of reliable anatomical landmarkers related to tibia fixation, it is still controversial whether it can help the alignment of tibial prosthesis rotation.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon should master the methods of rotation and alignment of tibial prosthesis, make preoperative plans, select appropriate alignment methods for different patients, and achieve individualization. Meanwhile, several anatomical landmarkers should be referred to properly during the operation, which can be used to detect the correct placement of tibial prosthesis and avoid large rotation error.

Three-point Method to Guide the Tibial Resection and Component Placing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To introduce a three‐point method combining the midpoint of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to determine appropriate tibial resection and component placing during TKA and to compare this method with Insall's 1/3 method.

Methods

A consecutive series of 128 knees that underwent TKA from January 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed. In one group (64 knees), the medial 1/3 of tibial tubercle (the Insall's traditional method) was used for tibial component alignment. In the other group (64 knees), the three‐point line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midpoint of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL was used for tibial component alignment. Both groups used the anterior tibial tendon as the distal reference for tibial resection. The coronal alignment error of the tibial component was determined by the angle between the line parallel to the tibial component platform and the tibial mechanical axis measured on postoperative radiograph. The axial rotation error of the femoral or tibial component was the intersection angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and a line tangent to the posterior edge of the femoral or tibial component measured on CT. The coronal and axial alignment errors were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average coronal alignment error of the tibial component in the three‐point method group was 0.2° ± 1.4° versus − 0.9° ± 1.8°in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 37.3% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the femoral component was 0.2° ± 1.2° in the three‐point method group versus − 1.1° ± 1.7° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in three‐point method group decreased by 43.9% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the tibial component was 0.4° ± 1.4° versus − 1.4° ± 1.8° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 35.5% compared to the Insall's traditional method group. The rates of rotation outliers were significantly lower in the three‐point method group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL could be used as the reference for the tibial resection and component placing. This method appears to be more accurate than Insall's 1/3 method. The results of this study provide a candidate method for component orientation with little error.

Analysis of the effect of tibial torsion on tibial osteotomy in knee arthroplasty using a three-dimensional computed tomography-based modelling technique

Background

Extramedullary systems are commonly used in knee arthroplasty, with the rod location being determined from the tibial torsion line during surgery. The traditional method for tibial torsion measurement is not in accordance with clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate proximal and distal tibial torsion using 3-dimensional (3D) computed technology to establish a new evaluation method, as well as to investigate the association between tibial torsion and postoperative alignment deviation.

Methods

Fifty-five osteoarthritis tibias with >10°varus preoperatively were divided into valgus, neutral, and varus groups based on their postoperative alignment deviation. A new method based on clinical practice was built using a 3D tibial model. Proximal and distal tibial torsions were measured by both the new and traditional methods. In addition, tibial osteotomy that followed the intramedullary osteotomy system was simulated on the 3D model in the varus and valgus groups to investigate the association between tibial torsion and alignment deviation.

Results

Proximal tibial torsion was smaller and distal torsion was greater in the valgus group than the other two groups, according to the new method (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). No significant difference was found when comparing these torsions by the traditional method (p = 0.782 and p = 0.753, respectively). In the valgus group, the postoperative alignment deviation improved after simulated osteotomy guided by the intramedullary system, while no significant improvement was found in the varus group.

Conclusion

According to this new tibial-rotation evaluation method, valgus deviation in knee arthroplasty was identified as the main cause for knees in which the proximal tibial internal torsion is too small and the distal external torsion is too great. The use of an intramedullary system may help reduce this deviation.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered.

Calipered Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Accurate Technique That Improves Patient Outcomes and Implant Survival

Kinematic alignment performed with caliper measurements and verification checks accurately co-align the femoral and tibial components with the 3 axes and joint lines of the native knee without ligament release and without restrictions on the degree of preoperative varus, valgus, flexion, and extension deformities and the degree of postoperative correction. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):126-135.].

The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA

PURPOSE

There is no present consensus on the most reliable anatomical landmarks or axes for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal was therefore to review the literature and compare accuracy and repeatability of different axes for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for articles that reported accuracy in terms of error or discrepancy from the trans-epicondylar axes (TEA), and/or repeatability in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient, of one or more axes used for tibial baseplate rotation in TKA. Twenty-one articles met criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated.

RESULTS

The selected articles evaluated 15 different axes, 13 for reliability, 12 for repeatability. The lowest errors or discrepancies from the projected TEA were reported for the original 'Akagi line' (posterior cruciate ligament posteriorly to medial border of tibial tuberosity), its variant using the sulcus of the tibial spines as anterior landmark, as well as the anterior tibial border and the curve-on-curve technique. The best inter-observer repeatabilities were reported for 'Akagi line' variants that use the geometric centre of the tibial plateau posteriorly and the medial border of the tibial tuberosity, or the medial sixth of the patellar tendon anteriorly. Considering accuracy and repeatability simultaneously, only two axes were found to satisfy both criteria consistently: the original 'Akagi line' and the anterior tibial border.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the small number of studies found, the collected evidence remains insufficient to recommend reference axes for intra-operative rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in TKA. A combination of two or more anatomical landmarks or projected axes could be used to ensure adequate tibial baseplate rotation, while considering individual patient morphology and implant design to optimize knee kinematics and prevent prosthetic overhang.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Increases in tibial force imbalance but not changes in tibiofemoral laxities are caused by varus-valgus malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned TKA

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to quantify the increase in tibial force imbalance (i.e. magnitude of difference between medial and lateral tibial forces) and changes in laxities caused by 2° and 4° of varus-valgus (V-V) malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and use the results to detemine sensitivities to errors in making the distal femoral resections. Because V-V malalignment would introduce the greatest changes in the alignment of the articular surfaces at 0° flexion, the hypotheses were that the greatest increases in tibial force imbalance would occur at 0° flexion, that primarily V-V laxity would significantly change at this flexion angle, and that the tibial force imbalance would increase and laxities would change in proportion to the degree of V-V malalignment.

METHODS

Kinematically aligned TKA was performed on ten human cadaveric knee specimens using disposable manual instruments without soft tissue release. One 3D-printed reference femoral component, with unmodified geometry, was aligned to restore the native distal and posterior femoral joint lines. Four 3D-printed femoral components, with modified geometry, introduced V-V malalignments of 2° and 4° from the reference component. Medial and lateral tibial forces were measured during passive knee flexion-extension between 0° to 120° using a custom tibial force sensor. Eight laxities were measured from 0° to 120° flexion using a six degree-of-freedom load application system.

RESULTS

With the tibial component kinematically aligned, the increase in the tibial force imbalance from that of the reference component at 0° of flexion was sensitive to the degree of V-V malalignment of the femoral component. Sensitivities were 54 N/deg (medial tibial force increasing > lateral tibial force) (p < 0.0024) and 44 N/deg (lateral tibial force increasing > medial tibial force) (p < 0.0077) for varus and valgus malalignments, respectively. Varus-valgus malalignment did not significantly change varus, internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior, and compression-distraction laxities from 0° to 120° flexion. At only 30° of flexion, 4° of varus malalignment increased valgus laxity 1° (p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSION

At 0° flexion, V-V malalignment of the femoral component caused the tibial force imbalance to increase significantly, whereas the laxities were relatively unaffected. Because tibial force imbalance has the potential to adversely affect patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction, surgeons should strive to limit errors in resecting the distal femoral condyles to within ± 0.5 mm which in turn limits the average increase in tibial force imbalance to 68 N. Because laxities were generally unaffected, instability resulting from large increases in laxity is not a clinical concern within the ± 4° range tested.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level II.

Variation in tibial tuberosity lateralization and distance from the tibiofemoral joint line: An anatomic study

BACKGROUND

To describe variation in tibial tuberosity position in a normal adult population and inter-rater reliability of measurements of tibial tuberosity position.

METHODS

Surface models of 161 proximal tibia specimens (83 female, 78 male; 80 black, 81 white; age 28.7years, SD 7.5) were created with a three-dimensional laser scanner. Percent lateralization, tuberosity-eminence angle, and distance from joint surface were measured for each specimen. Variation in tuberosity position by sex, race, age, height, and BMI was calculated. Multivariate regression was used to assess for demographic factors independently associated with tuberosity positioning.

RESULTS

Mean percent lateralization was 57.9% (SD 2.4, range 52.4-64.9%). Tuberosity-eminence angle mean was 11.03° (SD 2.8, range 0-18.7°). Percent lateralization and tuberosity-eminence angle were not influenced by sex, race, age, height or, BMI (p>0.05). Mean tuberosity distance from joint surface was 29.2mm (SD 3.5, range 16.6-38.6mm) and larger in males than females (30.7mm (SD 2.9), 27.6mm (SD 3.3); p<0.001). Tuberosity distance from joint surface increased 0.18mm on average per 1.0cm increase in height (p<0.001). Inter-rater reliability was high for distance from joint surface (Cronbach alpha=0.99) and percent lateralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial tuberosity percent lateralization falls in a narrow range for individuals, whereas tuberosity-eminence angle and distance from joint line are more variable. Inter-rater reliability is high for percent lateralization and distance for the joint surface. Distance of tibial tuberosity from joint surface is associated with sex and height.

Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance Shows no Change in Patients with or Without Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective

The primary aim of this study is to compare tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TTTG) distance in patients with or without knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, the variability of tibial tubercle according to trochlear groove was evaluated.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, TTTG distance was measured with two different methods on magnetic resonance (MR) images. TTTG distance was measured by the familiar method on 173 MR images, and by the novel method on 157 MR images of 175 patients totally. The patients were divided into two groups as group 1 (Kellgren Lawrence osteoarthritis grade <2) and group 2 (Kellgren Lawrence osteoarthritis grade ≥2). TTTG values measured by both methods were compared between groups. The coefficient of variation for all patients in TTTG values were calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

The mean age, sex distributions, and side ratios were different between groups. There was no statistical difference in TTTG values between group 1 and 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two measurement methods. The coefficient of variation for all patients in TTTG values were high (43.95% for familiar method and 44.64% for novel method). There was excellent interrater reliability for two measurement methods in both groups.

Conclusion

The TTTG distance is similar in patients with/without knee osteoarthritis. The position of the tibial tubercle according to the trochlear groove is variable, so the tibial tubercle may not be a good reference point for rotational position of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Medial tilting of the joint line in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty increases contact force and stress

BACKGROUND

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty is based on the concept to represent the premorbid joint alignment with cruciate-retaining implants, characterized by medial tilt and internal rotation. However, kinematic and kinetic effects of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with posterior-stabilized implants is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of medial tilting of the joint line with posterior-stabilized implants.

METHODS

A mechanical alignment model, and medial tilt 3° and 5° models were constructed. Knee kinematics and contact forces were simulated using a musculoskeletal computer simulation model. Contact stresses on the tibiofemoral joint and the post area were then calculated using finite element analysis.

FINDINGS

From 0° to 120° of knee flexion, greater external rotation of the femoral component was observed in medial tilt models (-0.6°, 1.8° and 4.2° in mechanical alignment, medial tilt 3° and medial tilt 5° models, respectively). The peak contact stresses on the tibiofemoral joint and the post area at 120° of knee flexion were higher in medial tilt models. The peak contact stresses on the post area in medial tilt 3° and 5° models were 2.2 and 3.8 times greater than that in mechanical alignment model, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Medial tilting of the joint line causes greater axial rotation even with posterior-stabilized implants, which can represent near-normal kinematics. However, medial tilting of the joint line in total knee arthroplasty with posterior-stabilized implants may have a higher risk for polyethylene wear at the tibiofemoral joint and post area, leading to subsequent component loosening.

Can kinematic tibial templates assist the surgeon locating the flexion and extension plane of the knee?

PURPOSE

We performed virtual feasibility and in-vivo validation studies to test whether the use of a kinematic tibial template (KTT) assists the surgeon in accurately locating the orientation of the F-E of the knee with low bias and high precision.

METHODS

With use of 166 3-dimensional bone models of normal knees, we designed seven KTTs that located the orientation of the F-E plane of the knee when best-fit within the cortical edge of the tibial resection. The virtual feasibility study asked 11 evaluators with different levels of surgical experience to use software and select, orient, and best-fit the KTT within the tibial resection of each bone model. The in-vivo validation study analyzed tibial component rotation on postoperative CT scans of 118 consecutive patients after one surgeon set the I-E rotation of the tibial component with a KTT when performing kinematically-aligned TKA. Bias and precision were computed as the mean and standard deviation of the differences between the A-P axis of the KTT and the F-E plane of the knee.

RESULTS

For the virtual feasibility study, the bias was 0.7° external and the precision was ±4.6° for 1826 KTT fittings, which were not affected by the level of surgical experience. For the in-vivo validation study, the bias was 0.1° external and the precision was ±3.9°.

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual feasibility and in-vivo validation studies suggest a KTT can assist the surgeon in accurately setting the I-E rotation of the tibial component parallel to the F-E plane of the knee when performing kinematically-aligned TKA.

Comparison of kinematic and mechanical alignment techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis compared clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

All studies comparing the operation time, change in hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes as assessed with various measurement tools, from direct interview to imaging methods, in patients who underwent primary TKA through the KA or MA technique were included.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.49-2.46; P = .69) did not differ significantly between the KA and MA techniques. The 2 groups were also similar in terms of change in hemoglobin (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.34; P = .91), length of hospital stay (95% CI: -0.04 to 0.55; P = .10), hip-knee-ankle angle (95% CI: -1.76 to 0.75; P = .43), joint line orientation angle (95% CI: -4.27 to 4.23; P = .99), tibial component slope (95% CI: -0.53 to 3.56; P = .15), and femoral component flexion (95% CI: -2.61 to 7.57; P = .34). In contrast, operation time (95% CI: -27.16 to -3.71; P = .01), overall functional outcome (95% CI: 6.59-11.51; P < .0001), knee anatomical axis (95% CI: -1.38 to -0.01; P = .05), femoral component relative to the mechanical axis (95% CI: -2.47 to -1.40; P < .0001), and tibial component relative to the mechanical axis (95% CI: 1.56-2.95; P < .0001) were significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, change in hemoglobin, length of hospital stay, hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line orientation angle, tibial component slope, or femoral component flexion between the KA and MA techniques for primary TKA. However, the KA technique resulted in a significantly shorter operation time and better overall functional outcome than the MA technique, even though the femoral component was placed in a slightly more valgus position relative to the mechanical axis and the tibial component in a slightly more varus position with the KA technique.

The medial border of the tibial tuberosity as an auxiliary tool for tibial component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to quantify the amount of ensuing internal rotation of the tibial component when positioned along the medial border of the tibial tubercle, thus establishing a reproducible intraoperative reference for tibial component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

The angle formed from the tibial geometric centre to the intersection of both lines from the middle of the tibial tuberosity and its medial border was measured in 50 patients. The geometric centre was determined on an axial CT slice at 10 mm below the lateral tibial plateau and transposed to a slice at the level of the most prominent part of the tibial tuberosity. Similar measurements were taken in 25 patients after TKA, in order to simulate the intraoperative appearance of the tibia after making its proximal resection.

RESULTS

This angle was found to be similar (n.s.) in normal and post-TKA tibiae [median 20.4° (range 15°-24°) vs. 20.7° (range 16°-25°), respectively]. In 89.3 % of the patients, the angle ranged from 17° to 24°. No statistical difference (p n.s.) was found between women and men in both normal [median -20.7° (range 16°-25°) vs. 19.9° (range 15°-24°)] and post-TKA tibiae [median 21.4° (range 19°-24°) vs. 20° (range 16°-25°)].

CONCLUSION

This study found that in 90 % of the patients, the medial border of the tibial tuberosity is internally rotated 17°-24° in relation to the line connecting the middle of the tuberosity to the tibial geometric centre. Since this anatomical landmark may be more easily identifiable intraoperatively than the commonly used "medial 1/3", it can provide a better quantitative reference point and help surgeons achieve a more accurate tibial implant rotational position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort and case control studies, Level III.

Does a positioning rod or a patient-specific guide result in more natural femoral flexion in the concept of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

Flexion of the femoral component in 5° increments downsizes the femoral component, decreases the proximal reach and surface area of the trochlea, delays the engagement of the patella during flexion, and is associated with a higher risk of patellar-femoral instability after kinematically aligned TKA. The present study evaluated flexion of the femoral component after use of two kinematic alignment instrumentation systems. We determined whether a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod inserted perpendicular to the distal femoral joint line in the axial plane and 8-10 cm into the distal femur anterior and posterior to the distal cortex of the femur in the sagittal plane or a femoral patient-specific cutting guide sets the femoral component in more natural flexion.

METHODS

Flexion of the femoral component was measured with respect to the sagittal femoral anatomic axis of the distal diaphysis and the sagittal femoral axis on rotationally controlled long-leg lateral computer scanograms. Measurements were performed on 53 consecutive patients treated with a kinematically aligned TKA performed with a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod, and 53 consecutive patients treated with a kinematically aligned TKA performed with a femoral patient-specific cutting guide.

RESULTS

The average flexion and variability (±standard deviation) of the femoral component of patients treated with a positioning rod was 1° ± 2° and 7° ± 4° with respect to the anatomic and mechanical axes, respectively, which was 5° less than the average flexion of the femoral component of patients treated with a femoral patient-specific cutting guide of 6° ± 4° and 12° ± 5° (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Because a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod sets the femoral component in 5° less flexion and with less variability than a femoral patient-specific cutting guide, we prefer this instrumentation system when performing kinematically aligned TKA to reduce the risk of patellar-femoral instability. Each surgeon should determine the repeatability of setting the flexion of the femoral component with this instrumentation system.

Preoperative Measurement of Tibial Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Accuracy of Postoperative Limb Alignment Restoration

Background:

Accuracy of implant placement in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial. Traditional extramedullary alignment instruments are fairly effective for achieving the desired mean tibial component coronal alignment. We modified the traditional tibial plateau resection technique and evaluated its effect on alignment restoration.

Methods:

Two hundred and eighty-two primary TKAs in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2014 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Group A consisted of 128 primary TKAs performed by one senior surgeon. Preoperative measurement of the tibial resection was conducted on radiographs, and the measured thicknesses of the lateral and medial plateau resection were used to place the tibial alignment guide. Group B consisted of 154 primary TKAs performed by the other senior surgeon, using a traditional tibial plateau resection technique. In all patients, an extramedullary guide was used for tibial resection, and preoperative and postoperative full-leg standing radiographs were used to assess the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral component alignment angle (FA), and tibial component alignment angle (TA). A deviation ≥3° was considered unsatisfactory. Data were analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test.

Results:

The mean postoperative HKA and TA angles were significantly different between Groups A and B (178.2 ± 3.2° vs. 177.0 ± 3.0°, t = 2.54, P = 0.01; 89.3 ± 1.8° vs. 88.3 ± 2.0°, t = 3.75, P = 0.00, respectively). The mean postoperative FA was 88.9 ± 2.5° in Group A and 88.9 ± 2.6° in Group B, and no significant difference was detected (t = 0.10, P = 0.92). There were 90 (70.3%) limbs with restoration of the mechanical axis to within 3° of neutral alignment and 38 (29.7%) outliers (>3° deviation) in Group A, whereas there were 89 (57.8%) limbs with restoration of the mechanical axis to within 3° of neutral alignment and 65 (42.2%) outliers (>3° deviation) in Group B. The severity of the preoperative alignment deformity was a strong predictor for postoperative alignment.

Conclusions:

Using conventional surgical instruments, preoperative measurement of resection thickness of the tibial plateau on radiographs could improve the accuracy of conventional surgical techniques.

The relationship between the midpoints connecting the tibial attachments of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and the transepicondylar axis: In vivo three-dimensional measurement in the Chinese population

BACKGROUND

To determine the relationship between the midpoints connecting the tibial attachments of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL and PCL, APCL line) and the transepicondylar axis (TEA) in normal healthy Chinese, as well as the comparison with other rotational lines.

METHODS

Left knees of 17 male and 15 female healthy Chinese volunteers were scanned by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) respectively. 3D contours of each knee, the tibial attachments of ACL, PCL, the medial and lateral collateral ligaments were reconstructed separately from CT and MRI data. Using an iterative closest point algorithm, we superimposed them individually. The APCL line, the tibial posterior condylar line (PC line), the medial third of the tibial tubercle (1/3 line), the Akagi's line, and the midsulcus of the tibial spine (Midsulcus line), the clinical and surgical TEA (CTEA and STEA) were determined. The paired intersection angles of them were measured.

RESULTS

The mean angle CTEA with APCL line, Akagi's line, Midsulcus line, 1/3 line, and PC line, respectively, was 90.3°±2.9°, 95.0°±3.0°, 94.0°±3.9°, 102.4°±2.7°, and 87.1°±3.0°. The APCL-CTEA was significant different than other angles (p<0.001). The mean angle STEA to the above lines, respectively, was 94.8°±3.1°, 99.4°±3.1°, 98.5°±4.0°, 106.9°±2.9°, and 91.6°±3.2°. The PC line-STEA was significantly different than other angles (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

APCL line was the closest perpendicular to the CTEA in normal Chinese subjects comparing with other rotational lines.

The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The restoration of the physiological femoro-tibial joint line (JL) is important to obtain a good outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). However, its assessment is challenging. The ratio of the distance between the adductor tubercle (AT) JL (ATJL) and the trans-epicondylar femoral width (FW) was proposed as a reliable method. The purpose of this study was to check whether this ratio is a reliable tool to restore the prosthetic JL height in challenging prosthetic revision cases.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (mean age 65.8 years) were recruited. During surgery, FW was measured and ATJL distance was calculated using 0.53 (SD 0.03) as the ratio. After implant positioning, the obtained ATJL line was measured to verify the accuracy of the surgical procedure. Thirteen patients presented a healthy contralateral knee: a comparative radiograph examination was performed to verify the appropriateness of the restored JL height.

RESULTS

The intra-operatively calculated ATJL was not significantly different with respect to the measured ATJL obtained after prosthetic component implantation. The comparative analysis between the restored JL and the JL of the contralateral not operated knee was also not statistically significant, thus confirming the appropriateness of the restored JL height.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the method which uses an AT to JL distance/FW ratio to determine the JL level, previously applied in primary TKA, is valid when using intra-operatively acquired measurements in RTKA. This is clinically relevant since it represents a reliable tool which helps surgeons to restore the JL level in challenging prosthetic revision cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Influence of tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty on knee kinematics and retropatellar pressure: an in vitro study

PURPOSE

Although continuous improvements have been made, there is still a considerable amount of unsatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A main reason for this high percentage is anterior knee pain, which is supposed to be provoked by post-operative increased retropatellar peak pressure. Since rotational malalignment of the implant is believed to contribute to post-operative pain, the aim of this study was to examine the influence of tibial component rotation on knee kinematics and retropatellar pressure.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen knee specimens were tested in a weight-bearing knee rig after fixed-bearing TKA under a loaded squat from 20° to 120° of flexion. To examine tibial components with different rotations, special inlays with 3° internal rotation and 3° external rotation were produced and retropatellar pressure distribution was measured with a pressure-sensitive film. The kinematics of the patella and the femorotibial joint were recorded with an ultrasonic-based motion analysis system.

RESULTS

Retropatellar peak pressure decreased significantly from 3° internal rotation to neutral position and 3° external rotation of the tibial component (8.5 ± 2.3 vs. 8.2 ± 2.4 vs. 7.8 ± 2.5 MPa). Regarding knee kinematics femorotibial rotation and anterior-posterior translation, patella rotation and tilt were altered significantly, but relative changes remained minimal.

CONCLUSION

Changing tibial rotation revealed a high in vitro influence on retropatellar peak pressure. We recommend the rotational alignment of the tibial component to the medial third of the tibial tuberosity or even more externally beyond that point to avoid anterior knee pain after TKA.

Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose - Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been introduced to improve alignment and reduce outliers, increase efficiency, and reduce operation time. In order to improve our understanding of the outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation, we conducted a meta-analysis. Patients and methods - We identified randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patient-specific and conventional instrumentation in TKA. Weighted mean differences and risk ratios were determined for radiographic accuracy, operation time, hospital stay, blood loss, number of surgical trays required, and patient-reported outcome measures. Results - 21 RCTs involving 1,587 TKAs were included. Patient-specific instrumentation resulted in slightly more accurate hip-knee-ankle axis (0.3°), coronal femoral alignment (0.3°, femoral flexion (0.9°), tibial slope (0.7°), and femoral component rotation (0.5°). The risk ratio of a coronal plane outlier (> 3° deviation of chosen target) for the tibial component was statistically significantly increased in the PSI group (RR =1.64). No significance was found for other radiographic measures. Operation time, blood loss, and transfusion rate were similar. Hospital stay was significantly shortened, by approximately 8 h, and the number of surgical trays used decreased by 4 in the PSI group. Knee Society scores and Oxford knee scores were similar. Interpretation - Patient-specific instrumentation does not result in clinically meaningful improvement in alignment, fewer outliers, or better early patient-reported outcome measures. Efficiency is improved by reducing the number of trays used, but PSI does not reduce operation time.

Does Malrotation of the Tibial and Femoral Components Compromise Function in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Internal and external malrotation of the femoral and tibial components is associated with poor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We determined the degree of malrotation for both components in kinematically aligned TKA and whether this malrotation compromised function. Seventy-one patients (mean age 68 years) were followed after TKA. Malrotation was measured. Simple regression determined the association between malrotation and function. Even though the range of malrotation of the tibial component can be greater than that of the femoral component, the malrotation of the femoral and tibial components bounded by the ranges reported in this study is compatible with a well-functioning TKA.

Effect of rotational alignment on outcome of total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Poor outcomes have been linked to errors in rotational alignment of total knee arthroplasty components. The aims of this study were to determine the correlation between rotational alignment and outcome, to review the success of revision for malrotated total knee arthroplasty, and to determine whether evidence-based guidelines for malrotated total knee arthroplasty can be proposed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review including all studies reporting on both rotational alignment and functional outcome. Comparable studies were used in a correlation analysis and results of revision were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

846 studies were identified, 25 of which met the inclusion criteria. From this selection, 11 studies could be included in the correlation analysis. A medium positive correlation (ρ = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27-0.59) and a large positive correlation (ρ = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.73) were found between external rotation of the tibial component and the femoral component, respectively, and the Knee Society score. Revision for malrotation gave positive results in all 6 studies in this field.

INTERPRETATION

Medium and large positive correlations were found between tibial and femoral component rotational alignment on the one hand and better functional outcome on the other. Revision of malrotated total knee arthroplasty may be successful. However, a clear cutoff point for revision for malrotated total knee arthroplasty components could not be identified.

Knee alignment in the transverse plane during weight-bearing activity and its implication for the tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The alignment of the knee in the transverse plane is important to the biomechanical functions of the lower limb, and is also associated with the outcomes of the total knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the dynamic tibiofemoral alignment in the transverse plane during a weight-bearing activity.

METHODS

Knee kinematics of weight-bearing flexion from 0° to 120° was obtained in 16 healthy subjects utilizing biplanar radiography and 3D-2D registration techniques. The anteroposterior axes of the femur at multiple flexion angles in the range of knee motion were used to calculate the anteroposterior axis of motion using the least square method. The latter was compared to six surface-derived anatomical axes in the proximal tibia which were most commonly reported in the literature. The relationship between the anteroposterior axis of motion and the tibial tubercle was also quantified.

FINDINGS

The anteroposterior axis of motion did not coincide with any of the six anatomical axes tested. Their orientations varied from 10.3° of external rotation to 9.9° of internal rotation in relation to the former. The anteroposterior axis of motion tended to intersect the tibial tubercle between the medial border and the medial 1/3 point.

INTERPRETATION

Instead of any of the tested anatomical axes, the transverse knee alignment during functional movements is associated with the medial 1/3 portion of the tibial tubercle. This region may be helpful for the rotational alignment of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: A case study on a single implant design

BACKGROUND

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of increasing interest because this method might improve postoperative patient satisfaction. In kinematic alignment the femoral component is implanted in a slightly more valgus and internally rotated position, and the tibial component is implanted in a slightly more varus and internally rotated position, than in mechanical alignment. However, the biomechanics of kinematically aligned TKA remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the kinematics and contact stresses of mechanically and kinematically aligned TKAs.

METHODS

A musculoskeletal computer simulation was used to determine the effects of mechanically or kinematically aligned TKA. Knee kinematics were examined for mechanically aligned, kinematically aligned, and kinematically aligned outlier models. Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact forces were measured using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Greater femoral rollback and more external rotation of the femoral component were observed with kinematically aligned TKA than mechanically aligned TKA. However, patellofemoral and tibiofemoral contact stresses were increased in kinematically aligned TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that kinematically aligned TKA produces near-normal knee kinematics, but that concerns for long-term outcome might arise because of high contact stresses.

Electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty-a single center, randomized, single-blind study comparing the results with conventional techniques

We report on the results of a randomized study (n=200) to compare total knee arthroplasty performed using conventional instrumentation or electromagnetic computer assisted surgical technique. 92% of navigated and 85% of conventional knees were implanted within ±3° from neutral mechanical alignment; there was no statistically significant difference between these proportions. There was also no difference in femoral or tibial rotation assessed by CT scan. At 1year follow up there was no statistical difference between the two groups in American Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Scores, patient satisfaction, quality of life, hospital length of stay, complication rates or other adverse events. Tourniquet time in the navigated group was longer. Proving value for navigation in total knee arthroplasty surgery remains a challenge.

The anteroposterior axis of the tibia in Korean patients undergoing total knee replacement

The aim of this study was to find anatomical landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee replacement (TKR) in a CT-based study. Pre-operative CT scanning was performed on 94 South Korean patients (nine men, 85 women, 188 knees) with osteoarthritis of the knee joint prior to TKR. The tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis was defined as a line perpendicular to the femoral surgical transepicondylar axis and passing through the centre of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The angles between the defined tibial AP axis and anatomical landmarks at various levels of the tibia were measured. The mean values of the angles between the defined tibial AP axis and the line connecting the anterior border of the proximal third of the tibia to the centre of the PCL was -0.2° (-17 to 14.1, sd 4.1). This was very close to the defined tibial axis, and remained so regardless of lower limb alignment and the degree of tibial bowing. Therefore, AP axis defined as described, is a reliable anatomical landmark for rotational alignment of tibial components.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1485–90.

Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography

PURPOSE

There is conflicting evidence whether custom instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves component position compared to standard instrumentation. Studies have relied on long-limb radiographs limited to two-dimensional (2D) analysis and subjected to rotational inaccuracy. We used postoperative computed tomography (CT) to evaluate preoperative three-dimensional templating and CI to facilitate accurate and efficient implantation of TKA femoral and tibial components.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a single-surgeon cohort of 78 TKA patients (51 custom, 27 standard) with postoperative CT scans using 3D reconstruction and contour-matching technology to preoperative imaging. Component alignment was measured in coronal, sagittal and axial planes.

RESULTS

Preoperative templating for custom instrumentation was 87 and 79 % accurate for femoral and tibial component size. All custom components were within 1 size except for the tibial component in one patient (2 sizes). Tourniquet time was 5 min longer for custom (30 min) than standard (25 min). In no case was custom instrumentation aborted in favour of standard instrumentation nor was original alignment of custom instrumentation required to be adjusted intraoperatively. There were more outliers greater than 2° from intended alignment with standard instrumentation than custom for both components in all three planes. Custom instrumentation was more accurate in component position for tibial coronal alignment (custom: 1.5° ± 1.2°; standard: 3° ± 1.9°; p = 0.0001) and both tibial (custom: 1.4° ± 1.1°; standard: 16.9° ± 6.8°; p < 0.0001) and femoral (custom: 1.2° ± 0.9°; standard: 3.1° ± 2.1°; p < 0.0001) rotational alignment, and was similar to standard instrumentation in other measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluated with CT, custom instrumentation performs similar or better to standard instrumentation in component alignment and accurately templates component size. Tourniquet time was mildly increased for custom compared to standard.

Maximizing tibial coverage is detrimental to proper rotational alignment

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the placement of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has focused on maximizing coverage of the tibial surface. However, the degree to which maximal coverage affects correct rotational placement of symmetric and asymmetric tibial components has not been well defined and might represent an implant design issue worthy of further inquiry.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using four commercially available tibial components (two symmetric, two asymmetric), we sought to determine (1) the overall amount of malrotation that would occur if components were placed for maximal tibial coverage; and (2) whether the asymmetric designs would result in less malrotation than the symmetric designs when placed for maximal coverage in a computer model using CT reconstructions.

METHODS

CT reconstructions of 30 tibial specimens were used to generate three-dimensional tibia reconstructions with attention to the tibial anatomic axis, the tibial tubercle, and the resected tibial surface. Using strict criteria, four commercially available tibial designs (two symmetric, two asymmetric) were placed on the resected tibial surface. The resulting component rotation was examined.

RESULTS

Among all four designs, 70% of all tibial components placed in orientation maximizing fit to resection surface were internally malrotated (average 9°). The asymmetric designs had fewer cases of malrotation (28% and 52% for the two asymmetric designs, 100% and 96% for the two symmetric designs; p < 0.001) and less malrotation on average (2° and 5° for the asymmetric designs, 14° for both symmetric designs; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Maximizing tibial coverage resulted in implant malrotation in a large percentage of cases. Given similar amounts of tibial coverage, correct rotational positioning was more likely to occur with the asymmetric designs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Malrotation of components is an important cause of failure in TKA. Priority should be given to correct tibial rotational positioning. This study suggested that it is easier to balance rotation and coverage with asymmetric tibial baseplates; clinical research will need to determine whether the observed difference affects patellar tracking, loosening rates, or the likelihood of revisions after TKA.

How frequent is rotational mismatch within 0°±10° in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

Rotational mismatch of the tibial component on the femoral component within 0°±10° is associated with better function after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Kinematically aligned TKA has gained interest; however, the percentage of kinematically aligned TKA within 0°±10° is unknown. The authors prospectively followed all patients who underwent TKA for primary osteoarthritis between December 2011 and April 2012 (194 patients, 195 knees). Each underwent kinematically aligned TKA with manual instruments. Aligning the anteroposterior axis of the tibial component parallel to the line that bisects the oval boundary of the lateral tibial condyle set internal/external rotation. Removing bone from the posterior femoral condyles equal in thickness to the femoral component after correction for cartilage wear set internal/external rotation and anteroposterior translation of the femoral component. Rotational mismatch of the tibial component on the femoral component was determined from a computed tomography scan of the knee. Ninety-seven percent of kinematically aligned TKA with fixed-bearing components had a rotational mismatch within 0°±10° (overall range, -11° to 11°). This percentage was higher and the range narrower than the 85% of TKA within 0°±10° and the -14° to 16° range reported for mechanically aligned TKA. The use of manual instruments to kinematically aligned TKA reliably limited rotational mismatch to within 0°±10°, which has been associated with better function.