1
|
Doorschodt TC, Smithuis FF, Helmerhorst GTT, Maas M. Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Overview and Practical Step-by-step Guide. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2024; 28:293-304. [PMID: 38768594 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a frequently encountered injury among athletes, often requiring surgical intervention to restore knee stability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ACL reconstruction is common, especially in the evaluation of clinical complications leading to knee instability, decreased range of motion, or pain. This article provides a detailed overview of normal and abnormal postoperative findings including a practical step-by-step guide for MRI assessment. MRI findings must be correlated with surgical technique, time interval from surgery to imaging, and clinical examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom C Doorschodt
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F Smithuis
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs T T Helmerhorst
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Maas
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kositsky A, Stenroth L, Barrett RS, Korhonen RK, Vertullo CJ, Diamond LE, Saxby DJ. Muscle Morphology Does Not Solely Determine Knee Flexion Weakness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Combined Experimental and Computational Modeling Study. Ann Biomed Eng 2024; 52:1313-1325. [PMID: 38421479 PMCID: PMC10995045 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03455-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The distal semitendinosus tendon is commonly harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, inducing substantial morbidity at the knee. The aim of this study was to probe how morphological changes of the semitendinosus muscle after harvest of its distal tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects knee flexion strength and whether the knee flexor synergists can compensate for the knee flexion weakness. Ten participants 8-18 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an ipsilateral distal semitendinosus tendon autograft performed isometric knee flexion strength testing (15°, 45°, 60°, and 90°; 0° = knee extension) positioned prone on an isokinetic dynamometer. Morphological parameters extracted from magnetic resonance images were used to inform a musculoskeletal model. Knee flexion moments estimated by the model were then compared with those measured experimentally at each knee angle position. A statistically significant between-leg difference in experimentally-measured maximal isometric strength was found at 60° and 90°, but not 15° or 45°, of knee flexion. The musculoskeletal model matched the between-leg differences observed in experimental knee flexion moments at 15° and 45° but did not well estimate between-leg differences with a more flexed knee, particularly at 90°. Further, the knee flexor synergists could not physiologically compensate for weakness in deep knee flexion. These results suggest additional factors other than knee flexor muscle morphology play a role in knee flexion weakness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a distal semitendinosus tendon graft and thus more work at neural and microscopic levels is required for informing treatment and rehabilitation in this demographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kositsky
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Lauri Stenroth
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Rod S Barrett
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rami K Korhonen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Christopher J Vertullo
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Knee Research Australia, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laura E Diamond
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - David J Saxby
- Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Speedtsberg MB, Zebis MK, Lauridsen HB, Magnussen E, Hölmich P. Anatomical retraction of the semitendinosus muscle following harvest of the distal semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:1706-1710. [PMID: 34471958 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06718-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Retraction of semitendinosus muscle has been reported after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with semitendinosus/gracilis-graft. However, very little data exist on the natural variation in side-to-side length symmetry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the side-to-side asymmetry of semitendinosus muscle length in individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using the semitendinosus/gracilis-graft compared to a group of healthy control subjects to establish the level of retraction that can confidently be ascribed the surgery. METHODS Eleven subjects aged 30 (19-39) years, with previous unilateral ACLR with the combined semitendinosus/gracilis tendon graft were recruited. Average follow-up was 6.8 years (0.3-13.0) after reconstruction. Ten healthy subjects aged 30 years (23-36) with no previous knee surgery served as controls. Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained of the thigh from 60 mm below the knee joint and 700 mm proximal to this point with a slice thickness of 5 mm with 5 mm inter-slice distance. Semitendinosus length was measured on both legs between the distal and proximal musculotendinous junction of the semitendinosus. Length difference between legs was calculated for all participants. Percentage of shortening was expressed relative to the healthy leg. RESULTS Subjects who had undergone ACLR had on average 81 mm (25%) shortening of the semitendinosus on the reconstructed leg compared to the non-reconstructed side. The healthy subjects all had less than 10 mm difference between legs (< 3%). The side-to-side difference was significantly different between the reconstructed patients and the healthy subjects (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This study indicates that retraction larger than 10 mm is a consequence of the tendon harvest and not natural variation. It also supports that persistent retraction of the semitendinosus muscle occurs following harvest of the semitendinosus tendon for ACL graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M B Speedtsberg
- Human Movement Analysis Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Amager, Denmark
- Sports Orthopedic Research Center - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Amager, Denmark
| | - M K Zebis
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Technology, University College Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - H B Lauridsen
- Human Movement Analysis Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Amager, Denmark
| | - E Magnussen
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Amager, Denmark
| | - P Hölmich
- Sports Orthopedic Research Center - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Amager, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhillon MS, Rajnish RK, Dhillon S, Kumar P. Is there significant regeneration of the hamstring tendons after harvest for ACL reconstruction? A systematic review of literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 16:208-218. [PMID: 33680834 PMCID: PMC7919951 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regeneration potential of Hamstring tendons after harvest assumes significant clinical relevance as its use has become widespread today. Methods which best assess the regeneration, extent and type of regeneration, plus issues related to functional loss are important for the surgeon to know. This review looks at the literature to find answers to the above questions. PURPOSE To summarize the evidence in support of hamstring tendon regeneration, and the most appropriate modality for evaluation of regeneration. Additionally, to evaluate the regeneration in terms of complete or partial, extent and its impact on strength deficit and functional outcomes. METHODS We did a systematic review of literature through specified search engines and identified 30 of 285 studies to be relevant (19 prospective and 11 retrospective). RESULTS Evaluation of above data suggests tissue regeneration at harvest sites does occur (78.9% of semitendinosus and 42.7% of gracilis tendons), but this regeneration is variable. No established definition of regeneration exists; MRI is an adequate tool to identify regeneration, while biopsy is confirmative. USG is a cost-effective screening method and can document distal progress of regenerate. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons regenerate at different rates and extents, and often fuse together, but there is no evidence to state that one regenerates better than the other. Proximal retraction of the muscle-tendon junction occurs, along with some atrophy, which affects function to a variable extent. Strength deficits may persist, but they may not convert to significant functional deficits. CONCLUSION There is variable hamstring regeneration after harvest, with poorly defined definition of "regeneration". Some changes in the muscle itself, abnormal distal insertion and absence of regeneration in some are documented, along with strength deficits. Although overall functional deficits have been reported to be minimal, a definite change in the anatomy of the medial hamstrings is a factor to be kept in consideration. More information is needed about the long-term consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep S. Dhillon
- Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institue of Medical Eduacation and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, PIN-174001, India
| | | | - Prasoon Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institue of Medical Eduacation and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hamstrings Muscle Morphology After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2021; 51:1733-1750. [PMID: 33638795 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01431-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hamstrings muscle morphology is determinant of muscle function (i.e. strength). Among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), less cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the ACLR-limb are associated with muscle weakness, and may contribute to lower rates of return to preinjury activity level and an increased risk for long-term sequelae. OBJECTIVES To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR. METHODS We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. RESULTS Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Flies A, Denecke T, Kraus N, Kruppa P, Provencher MT, Becker R, Kopf S. Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study. J Exp Orthop 2020; 7:19. [PMID: 32266508 PMCID: PMC7138873 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00236-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The gracilis tendon (GT) is a commonly used autologous graft in Orthopaedic surgery. The majority of information on knee function and outcomes after hamstring harvest is related to both semitendinosus and GT harvest. Little is known regarding isolated harvest of a GT. It was hypothesized that isolated GT harvest would lead to altered gait patterns (e.g. augmented anterior-posterior translation or rotation in the tibiofemoral joint) and consequently a higher prevalence of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears in knees. Methods GT harvesting was performed on patients with chronic acromioclavicular joint instability without previous knee injuries or surgeries. MRI of both knees and thighs were performed. Knee MRI were evaluated using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities, cross-sectional areas of different muscles, fatty infiltration of the gracilis muscle (GM) and GT regeneration were evaluated. The contralateral limb served as reference. The observers were blinded towards the identity of the patients and the operatively treated side. Results After a mean time of 44 months after surgery testing was performed on 12 patients. No significant side-to-side differences were found using WORMS, although there was a trend towards increased cartilage lesions after GT harvest (median healthy knee 4.8 and GT harvested knee 7.8 p = 0.086). Inter- and intraobserver repeatability was high with 0.899 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.708–0.960) and 0.988 (95% CI 0.973–0.995), respectively. A significant hypotrophy of the GM with a mean decrease of 25.3%, 18.4% and 16.9% occurred at 25% (p = 0.016), 50% (p = 0.007) and 75% (p = 0.002) of the length of the femur from distal. No compensatory hypertrophy of other thigh muscles or increased fatty infiltration of the GM was found. Tendon regeneration took place in eight out of 12 patients. In case of regeneration, the regenerated tendon inserted in a more proximal place. Conclusion Isolated harvest of the GT for shoulder procedures did not affect knee MRI significantly indicating therefore in general suitable graft utilization for surgeries outside of the knee. GT regenerated in most patients with just a more proximal insertion and a hypotrophy of the muscle belly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Flies
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natascha Kraus
- Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Philipp Kruppa
- Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Microsurgery/Hand surgery, Hospital Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany
| | | | - Roland Becker
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kopf
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Karagiannidis E, Kellis E, Galanis N, Vasilios B. Semitendinosus muscle architecture during maximum isometric contractions in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2017; 7:147-151. [PMID: 28717622 DOI: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most widely used graft as a replacement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the semitendinosus (ST) tendon graft. After harvesting for ACL reconstruction, the hamstring tendon regenerates in most people and becomes similar to normal. The effect of graft harvest on muscle morphology and function remains unclear. The present study aimed to examine the morphology of the ST during isometric contraction after harvesting the ST tendon for ACL reconstruction. METHODS Maximal isometric contractions of the knee flexors from two angular positions were performed by 8 participants, at least 1 year after ACL reconstruction with an ST tendon graft and 8 matched controls. Ultrasonographic images were used to measure the pennation angle and muscle thickness of the ST muscle. RESULTS There was not a statistically significant difference in pennation angle values between the control group and the group who underwent ACL reconstruction (p >0.05). Muscle thickness was significantly higher in the ACLR group compared with controls (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction display a higher ST muscle thickness but similar pennation angle compared with controls. This indicates that ACL reconstruction has an effect on ST muscle belly but effect on force generation capacity is rather limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IIb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evagelos Karagiannidis
- Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Kellis
- Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikiforos Galanis
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Baltzopoulos Vasilios
- Research Center for Sport and Exercise Sciences LIverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grassi A, Bailey JR, Signorelli C, Carbone G, Wakam AT, Lucidi GA, Zaffagnini S. Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A practical guide. World J Orthop 2016; 7:638-649. [PMID: 27795945 PMCID: PMC5065670 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i10.638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 06/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed worldwide. In this regard, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a useful pre-operative tool to confirm a disruption of the ACL and to assess for potential associated injuries. However, MRI is also valuable post-operatively, as it is able to identify, in a non-invasive way, a number of aspects and situations that could suggest potential problems to clinicians. Graft signal and integrity, correct tunnel placement, tunnel widening, and problems with fixation devices or the donor site could all compromise the surgical outcomes and potentially predict the failure of the ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, several anatomical features of the knee could be associated to worst outcomes or higher risk of failure. This review provides a practical guide for the clinician to evaluate the post-surgical ACL through MRI, and to analyze all the parameters and features directly or indirectly related to ACL reconstruction, in order to assess for normal or pathologic conditions.
Collapse
|