High prevalence of all complex Segond avulsion using ultrasound imaging

Segond fracture: an indicator for increased risk of lateral meniscus injury in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and anatomic distribution of meniscus injury in patients who have sustained acute ACL injuries with and without concomitant Segond fracture. We hypothesized that patients who have sustained a torn ACL with a concomitant Segond fracture would have a higher incidence of lateral meniscal injuries than patients with an isolated ACL injury.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Segond fractures were identified on knee radiographs. Inclusion criteria were age 18-40, injury during sports activity, and reconstruction within 90 days of injury. Sports activity, anatomic location of meniscus injury, and meniscus treatment were documented. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of meniscus injury/treatment.

RESULTS

There were 25 of 603 (4.1%) patients who had an ACL tear with concomitant Segond fracture. The incidence of lateral meniscus injury in the Segond group (72%) was significantly higher than in the non-Segond cohort (49%; p = 0.024). A significantly smaller proportion of medial meniscus injuries among patients with Segond fractures were repaired (23.1%) compared to the non-Segond group (54.2%; p = 0.043). Multivariate analysis found patients with Segond fractures to have increased odds of lateral meniscus injury (OR 2.68; [1.09, 6.60], p = 0.032) and were less likely to have medial meniscus injuries repaired (OR 0.35; [0.15, 0.81], p = 0.014). Additionally, males had increased odds of lateral meniscus injury (OR 1.54; [1.08 - 2.91], p = 0.017), which were more likely to require repair (OR 1.48; [1.02, 2.14], p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Among acute ACL injuries, the incidence of lateral meniscus injury is greater among patients with Segond fractures. Patients with Segond fracture were less likely to undergo repair of medial meniscal injuries.

Comparative use of ultrasound and radiography for the detection of fractures: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Background

Traditionally, X-rays have remained the standard modality for bone fracture diagnosis. However, other diagnostic modalities most notably ultrasound have emerged as a simple, radiation-safe, effective imaging tool to diagnose bone fractures. Despite the advantages, there is a prevalent scarcity of literature recognizing its significance in bone trauma management. This review investigates the effectiveness of ultrasound in the diagnosis of various bone fractures when compared to conventional radiography such as X-rays.

Methodology

Electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, and Web of Science (WOS) were reviewed for observational studies and review articles from the years 2017-2022 utilizing MESH terminology in a broad term search strategy. The search returned a total of 248 articles. After removal of duplicates, abstract, and full-text screening this systematic review ultimately utilized data from 31 articles. All searches were performed and analyzed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology and were conducted during August 2022. In accordance with the guidelines for assessing the quality of included systematic reviews, we used the AMSTAR 2020, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/MS9/A241 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A data extraction form based on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review group's extraction template for quality assessment and evidence synthesis was used for data extraction. The information extracted included details such as author information, database, journal details, type of study, etc. Studies included will be classified into long bones, short bones, pneumatic bones, irregular bones, ankle and knee, stress fractures, hip fractures, POCUS, and others. All included studies considered bias and ethical criteria and provided valuable evidence to answer the research question.

Results

The search returned a total of 248 articles, with 192 articles remaining after the removal of duplicates. Primary screening of the title and abstract articles from the database search and additional sources identified 68 relevant articles for full-text screening. This systematic review ultimately used data from 33 articles of the remaining articles we included all of them because they had more than 70% certainty, using the STROBE tool for observational articles, narrative reviews with the ENTREQ guide, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses with the PRISMA guide; however, two articles were excluded at the eligibility stage because of risk of bias.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides insightful evidence on safety and effectiveness of ultrasound in diagnosing fractures when compared to the conventional imaging modalities such as X-rays. This shall promote further large-scale, multi-centre research that can eventually guide clinic practice in diagnosing and managing various bone fractures.

The segond fracture: A narrative review of the anatomy, biomechanics and clinical implications

The Segond fracture is commonly regarded as pathognomonic for significant intra-articular pathology such as an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. There is worsened rotatory instability in patients with concomitant ACL tear and Segond fracture. Current evidence does not suggest that a concomitant and unrepaired Segond fracture leads to worst clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction. However, there remains a lack of consensus on several aspects of the Segond fracture such as its exact anatomical attachments, ideal imaging modality for detection and indication for surgical treatment. There is currently no comparative study evaluating the outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction and Segond fracture fixation. More research is necessary to deepen our understanding and establish consensus on the role of surgical intervention.

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With a Concomitant Segond Fracture: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The Segond fracture can be observed in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. It is unclear whether the Segond fracture affects clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the presence of a concomitant Segond fracture affects clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction and to compare clinical outcomes when a Segond fracture is repaired surgically or left unrepaired.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were searched in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on July 27, 2020. Relevant studies regarding ACL injury with concomitant Segond fracture treated by primary ACL reconstruction were screened in duplicate. Data regarding patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were extracted. Descriptive data are presented, and a random-effects model was used to pool amenable data.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies examining 2418 patients (987 female; 40.8%), mean age 25.4 years, were included in this study. There were 304 patients with a Segond fracture (mean age, 28.1 years; 35.9% female) and 2114 patients without a Segond fracture (mean age, 25.1 years; 41.5% female). Four studies directly compared outcomes between patients with an unrepaired Segond fracture and no Segond fracture. One study reported 12 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of a Segond fracture. Among 4 studies, 11 of 292 (3.8%) graft failures/revision surgeries were reported in the groups that had Segond fracture, whereas 145 of 2114 (6.9%) graft failures/revision surgeries were reported in groups that did not have Segond fracture. No significant difference was observed in the risk of graft failure between the 2 groups, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.32-1.07; P = .08; I2 = 0%). No clinically significant differences were observed with regard to International Knee Document Committee score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and postoperative knee laxity between the group with Segond fracture and those without.

CONCLUSION

An unrepaired Segond fracture does not appear to have any significant negative effect on postoperative stability or risk of graft failure or revision surgery after ACL reconstruction. Future prospective studies may be warranted to confirm the finding that patients with combined ACL injury and Segond fracture may have outcomes comparable with those of ACL-injured patients without a Segond fracture when isolated ACL reconstruction is performed.

The anterolateral capsule is infrequently damaged as evaluated arthroscopically in patients undergoing anatomic ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Concomitant anterolateral complex (ALC) injury may contribute to persistent rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. There is no consensus on how to best identify concomitant ALC injury preoperatively, nor how well ALC injury identified on imaging modalities correlates with clinical examination of knee instability. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of concomitant ALC injury in ACL-injured knees, as determined by arthroscopy to preoperative radiography, ultrasound, and MRI.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients with a unilateral primary ACL injury who underwent individualized anatomic ACLR between June 2016 and May 2019 were enrolled. Preoperative imaging modalities, including X-ray, ultrasound, and MRI, were evaluated for concomitant ALC injury. Clinical examination under anesthesia, including the anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests were performed. Anterolateral capsule injury, as defined by hemorrhage and/or capsular tearing on diagnostic arthroscopy, was also determined. Correlative analyses of ALC injury incidence and severity were performed across imaging modalities and against clinical examination grades.

RESULTS

ALC injury incidence across imaging modalities was as follows: X-ray (3%), arthroscopy (19%), MRI (53%), and US (63%). The ALC injury rate on arthroscopy was significantly less than MRI (p < 0.001) or ultrasound (p < 0.001). ALC injury incidence and severity were significantly correlated between MRI and US grading scales (p = 0.02), but no correlations among other imaging modalities were found. Similarly, no imaging modality meaningfully correlated with physical examination maneuvers.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ALC injury varies across imaging modalities, with lower injury rates found on arthroscopy (19%) compared to MRI (53%) and US (63%). Increasing ALC injury severity grades on imaging does not predict increasing anterolateral knee laxity on clinical examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, retrospective case series.

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture and associated Segond fracture: Incidence and effect on associated ligamentous and meniscal injuries

Introduction

The Segond fracture is an avulsion fracture of the lateral tibial plateau and is widely considered to be pathognomonic of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. In addition to ACL rupture, Segond fractures have also been noted to be associated with significant intra-articular pathology such as meniscal injuries as well as extra-articular pathology such as collateral ligament injuries. This is likely due to the fact that the presence of a Segond fracture may represent increased rotatory instability. Whilst several studies have demonstrated the association of a Segond fracture with significant intra-articular pathology, there is a paucity of literature assessing if the combination of an ACL rupture and Segond fracture gives rise to higher rates of concomitant ligamentous and meniscal injuries. The primary objective of this study is to determine if patients with ACL ruptures associated with Segond fractures have higher rates of concomitant ligamentous and meniscal injury, when compared to patients with ACL ruptures without a Segond fracture.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ACL reconstruction in a single institution between 2014 to 2018 was conducted. A review of the patients’ demographics, operative notes, and radiographs was performed. X-rays and MRI scans were double-read by a board-certified radiologist and Orthopaedic surgeon.

Results

A total of 414 subjects were included. The incidence of Segond fracture was 2.4%. The mean age was 24.7±7.4 (range 16 to 60) years and 26.7±7.6 (range 16 to 38) years in patients with and without Segond fractures respectively. 89.9% of patients suffered a non-contact mechanism of injury, with sports injuries being most common (79.5%). There was a significantly higher rate of isolated lateral meniscus tears in patients with Segond fractures compared to those without (50% v.s. 20.8%) based on pre-operative MRI. (p<0.05) There were no other significant differences in associated ligamentous injuries.

Conclusion

The incidence of Segond fracture associated with ACL rupture is 2.4%. There is a significantly higher risk of a concomitant isolated lateral meniscus tear in ACL ruptures associated with a Segond fracture. There is no significantly higher risk of concomitant ligamentous injuries in ACL ruptures associated with a Segond fracture.

Prevalence of Segond fractures associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and their influence on knee joint stability; A case-control study

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of Segond fractures and to compare knee stability between patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without Segond fractures pre- and postoperatively.

Methods

A total of 712 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2019. Exclusion criteria included patients with multi-ligament knee injuries, skeletally immature patients, osteoarthritis in the knee, combined surgery of high tibial osteotomy, lack of data, and loss to follow-up for at least 2 years. Segond fractures were confirmed using plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with Segond fractures were classified into Group S and without Segond fractures into Group N. Pre- and postoperative Lachman grades, pivot-shift grades, and assessment of side-to-side differences in anterior stability were evaluated.

Results

Five hundred and forty patients included in this study. There were 22 patients with Segond fractures. Of these, all 22 cases (4.1%) were identified on CT, but only 20 cases (3.7%) were identified on MRI and 18 cases (3.3%) on plain radiographs. There was no significant difference in preoperative Lachman grade or pivot-shift grade between Groups S and N (p = 0.662, p = 0.677, respectively). There was no significant difference in postoperative Lachman grade or pivot-shift grade between Groups S and N (p = 0.685, p = 0.390, respectively). There were no significant differences in preoperative (p = 0.398) or postoperative (p = 0.546) side-to-side differences of anterior stability between Groups S and N.

Conclusions

Segond fractures were confirmed in 4.1% of the cases on CT scans among patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Segond fractures did not affect preoperative or 2-year follow-up evaluations of knee stability. From these results, we concluded that Segond fractures did not affect the clinical outcomes of the primary ACL reconstruction and that it may not be necessary to treat Segond fractures.

The relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears

BACKGROUND

Segond fracture may be identified when an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is diagnosed, and it has historically been considered a sign of significant knee trauma indicating intra-articular injury. There are few studies on the correlation between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury in patients with ACL tears.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction (less than 1 month from the time of injury) between 2013 and 2020 was performed. The absence or presence of a Segond fracture was confirmed using preoperative radiographs. Demographic data (age, sex and body mass index), injury variables (time from injury and mechanism of injury) and arthroscopic features (meniscal or chondral injury) were analysed to investigate the relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients were included in the study. The incidence of Segond fractures was 12.4%. Among the patients with a Segond fracture, 15 patients were injured playing soccer (28.3%), 11 patients were injured playing basketball (20.8%), eight patients sustained the injury during racquet sports (15.1%), five patients (9.4%) were injured during less popular sports (such as skiing, ice-skating and boxing), and 14 patients (26.4%) were injured by contact mode of injury. A Segond fracture was a significant risk factor for lateral meniscus tears in patients with ACL tears (adjusted odds ratio, 1.938; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-3.481; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of Segond fractures in patients with acute ACL tears was higher than that reported in previous studies. A Segond fracture could increase the risk of a lateral meniscus tear in patients with an ACL tear.

Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for the Acute Evaluation and Management of Soccer Players

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) has many applications in the care of athletes. This article reviews the current literature and identifies research gaps regarding musculoskeletal US in the athletic training room setting to evaluate and manage soccer players. The best evidence for US in the training room setting is for diagnosis and prognosis of muscle injuries, where studies show that it is equivalent to other imaging modalities. US also has been used for injury risk prediction, although the data are mixed. Many applications of US are described in other sport settings and may have crossover applications to soccer.

High Incidence of Intra-articular Injuries With Segond Fractures of the Tibia in the Pediatric and Adolescent Population

BACKGROUND

Segond fractures (avulsion fractures of the proximal lateral tibia) are highly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in adult patients. This large case series of pediatric Segond fractures describes the associated intra-articular knee injuries to determine if these fractures have a high incidence of ACL tears or its equivalent injury in young patients.

METHODS

Institutional review board approved retrospective study at a tertiary children's hospital of patients under 19 years who were diagnosed with a Segond fracture between 2009 and 2019 was conducted. Demographics, clinical data, imaging features, associated injuries, and treatment information were collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (44 males and 9 females) with median age 15.4 (11.8 to 19) years with Segond fractures of the proximal tibia on radiographic imaging were included. Diagnosis of associated injuries was established based on clinical examination, radiology report, and arthroscopic findings. Median Segond fracture size was 2.0×9.0 mm measured on standard anteroposterior knee radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained in 49/53 (92.5%) patients. Associated injuries included ACL tears (39 patients, 73.6%), tibial spine fractures (9, 17.0%), and other injuries (5, 9.4%). 37/53 (69.8%) patients had meniscal injury. Three (5.7%) patients sustained multiligament injuries. All associated injuries were confirmed by either MRI/computerized tomography or direct operative examination. Among Segond fractures found with ACL tears, 12 (30.8%) were contact injuries, 30 (76.9%) were sports injuries. In associated tibial spine fractures, 7 (78%) injuries were contact in nature and were sports related. There was a statistically significant difference (P=0.013) in age, patients with tibial spine fractures (median 13.6 y) being younger than those with ACL tears (median 15.4 y). 12/53 (22.6%) had associated articular cartilaginous injuries, 3 of which were treated surgically. Overall, 81.1% of patients were treated operatively for associated intra-articular injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

This large case series of Pediatric Segond fractures suggests a high association with intra-articular injuries, specifically, ACL tears and its equivalent injury, that is, tibial spine fractures, the later more common in the younger patient population. An MRI is recommended in patients with a Segond fracture for characterizing the exact intra-articular injury to help plan the appropriate management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-prognostic.

Painful Palpation of the Tibial Insertion of the Anterolateral Ligament Is Concordant With Acute Anterolateral Ligament Injury

Background

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been shown to contribute to the rotational stability of the knee. However, no clinical sign specific to ALL injury has been described.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The primary aim of this study was to determine the concordance between pain elicited upon ALL palpation and ALL injury diagnosed by ultrasonography (US). The secondary aim was to look for a relationship between ALL injury and high-grade pivot shift. We hypothesized that an ALL lesion can be diagnosed clinically in an acute knee injury by palpating its tibial insertion.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

A total of 130 patients (89 men, 41 women; mean age, 27.2 ± 8.3 years) with an acute, isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury who were scheduled for ligament reconstruction were enrolled in this study. ALL palpation was carried out a mean 8.8 ± 3.2 days after injury. Preoperatively, ALL integrity was evaluated with US, and the pivot shift was determined under general anesthesia. The agreement between pain upon ALL palpation and ALL injury detected on US was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), along with 95% CIs.

Results

Distal palpation of the ALL tibial insertion elicited pain in 67 (51.5%) patients, and upon US the ALL was found to be damaged in 64 (49.2%) patients. The agreement between pain over the ALL tibial insertion and the ALL being damaged on US was excellent (ICC, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.730-0.855). Moreover, the clinical test had excellent sensitivity (92%; 95% CI, 88%-97%) and specificity (88%; 95% CI, 82%-93%). The agreement between pain at the ALL distal insertion and the pivot shift was good (ICC, 0.654; 95% CI, 0.543-0.742), and ALL palpation had excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying rotational instability (sensitivity, 88% [95% CI, 82%-93%]; specificity, 97% [95% CI, 94%-100%]).

Conclusion

Palpation of the ALL tibial insertion highly correlates with ultrasonographic evidence of an ALL injury in the context of an acute knee injury. This simple test should become part of our standard examination when evaluating patients with acute knee injuries.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Trauma to the Knee

Acute trauma to the knee is a common presentation seen in the emergency department. After a routine clinical examination, imaging is frequently performed to facilitate the diagnosis and almost always starts with radiographs. If clinically indicated, advanced cross-sectional imaging may then be performed for further evaluation. CT is often performed for preoperative planning of the complex tibial plateau and distal femur fractures. Currently, MRI is the study of choice for evaluation of bone marrow, internal derangements, and other soft-tissue injuries about the knee joint. In patients with knee dislocations, MR angiography may be performed simultaneously with MRI for evaluation of internal derangements and vascular injuries with less morbidity compared to conventional angiography. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Incidence and Prognostic Significance of the Segond Fracture in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The Segond fracture is an avulsion of the anterolateral tibia that can be found in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. It is currently unclear if the Segond fracture needs treatment or if it heals spontaneously and if it is associated with an increased risk of failure after ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To identify the incidence and spontaneous healing rate of Segond fractures in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and to examine the predictive value of the Segond fracture on the risk of undergoing revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a cohort undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction between 2002 and 2016 was performed. Radiographs from the time of injury and preoperative radiographs were evaluated for Segond fractures and healed Segond fractures. Descriptive data were extracted from an internal quality database. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate risk of revision surgery and to compare across subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1364 patients were included in the study. The incidence of Segond fractures was 7.4%. In addition, 10.4% of patients displayed signs of healed Segond fractures. In total, 15.2% of patients had either 1 or both findings. The overall healing response of the fracture was 35.6%. Those with Segond fractures were older (P = .014) and had a shorter interval from injury to surgery (P = .003) as compared with the rest of the cohort. The incidence of Segond fractures was significantly higher in those injured during downhill skiing as compared with other injury mechanisms (P = .04). The Segond fracture did not represent an increased risk of undergoing revision when compared with the control group (not significant).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of conventional Segond fractures in patients with ACL injury was found to be in accordance with former studies. Accounting for the high incidence of healed Segond fractures, a much higher incidence (15%) was seen. Although the spontaneous healing rate from initial radiographs to preoperative imaging was only 36%, the presence of Segond fractures did not represent a higher risk of undergoing revision surgery.

Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic ultrasound imaging in partial and complete anterior cruciate ligament tears: a retrospective study in 247 patients

Objectives

Dynamic ultrasound (US) imaging shows promising possibilities for accurate imaging in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and can be used as a point-of-care test. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic US imaging for detecting partial and complete ACL tears.

Methods

247 patients presenting with knee complaints, who underwent dynamic US imaging as well as arthroscopy for any intra-articular knee pathology, were retrospectively evaluated. We differentiated between partial and complete ACL tears.

Results

Dynamic US imaging revealed 95 of 108 arthroscopically confirmed ACL tears (sensitivity 88%, specificity 82%, positive predictive value (PPV) 79%, negative predictive value (NPV) 90%, and diagnostic OR (DOR) of 33.3). Sensitivity of US in the detection of partial ACL tears was 52%, specificity 85%, PPV 52%, NPV 84% and DOR 5.8. Complete ACL tears were depicted with a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 89%, PPV of 63%, NPV of 95% and DOR 29.8. Multivariate regression analysis adjusting for age (dichotomised per 5 years) and previous knee surgery showed similar DOR.

Conclusion

The excellent NPV for complete ACL tears indicates that dynamic US imaging can be used as an initial imaging point-of-care test. However, the clinical presentation should be taken into account, especially in case of subtotal tears. Whereas it seems relatively easy to differentiate between (small) partial ACL tears, complete ACL tears and no tears, it seems to be difficult to differentiate subtotal tears from complete tears.

The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting

The structure and function of the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has created much controversy since the 're-discovery' of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its proposed role in aiding control of anterolateral rotatory laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee. A group of surgeons and researchers prominent in the field gathered to produce consensus as to the anatomy and biomechanical properties of the ALC. The evidence for and against utilisation of ALC reconstruction was also discussed, generating a number of consensus statements by following a modified Delphi process. Key points include that the ALC consists of the superficial and deep aspects of the iliotibial tract with its Kaplan fibre attachments on the distal femur, along with the ALL, a capsular structure within the anterolateral capsule. A number of structures attach to the area of the Segond fracture including the capsule-osseous layer of the iliotibial band, the ALL and the anterior arm of the short head of biceps, and hence it is not clear which is responsible for this lesion. The ALC functions to provide anterolateral rotatory stability as a secondary stabiliser to the ACL. Whilst biomechanical studies have shown that these structures play an important role in controlling stability at the time of ACL reconstruction, the optimal surgical procedure has not yet been defined clinically. Concern remains that these procedures may cause constraint of motion, yet no clinical studies have demonstrated an increased risk of osteoarthritis development. Furthermore, clinical evidence is currently lacking to support clear indications for lateral extra-articular procedures as an augmentation to ACL reconstruction. The resulting statements and scientific rationale aim to inform readers on the most current thinking and identify areas of needed basic science and clinical research to help improve patient outcomes following ACL injury and subsequent reconstruction.Level of evidence V.

A novel test for assessment of anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee: the tibial internal rotation test (TIR test)

Background

Rotational instability of the knee may persist after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, which may be due to insufficiency of anterolateral stabilizing structures. However, no reliable diagnostic tool or physical examination test is available for identifying patients with anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI). As shown in cadaveric studies, static internal rotation of the knee is increased in higher flexion angles of the knee after severing the anterolateral structures. This might also be the case in patients with an ACL-deficient knee and concomitant damage to the anterolateral structures. The objective of this study is to assess anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee during physical examination with a tibial internal rotation test.

Methods

ACL-injured knees of 52 patients were examined by two examiners and side-to-side differences were compared. Both lower legs were internally rotated by applying manual internal rotation torque to both feet in prone position with the knees in 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. For quantification of the amount of rotation in degrees, a torque adapter on a booth was used. Intra-rater, inter-rater and rater-device agreement were determined by calculating kappa (κ) for the tibial internal rotation test.

Results

Tibial internal rotation is increased in 19.2% of the patients with ACL injury according to the tibial internal rotation test. Good intra-rater agreement was found for the tibial internal rotation test, κ_C = 0.63 (95%CI -0.02-1.28), p = 0.015. Fair inter-rater agreement was found, κ_F = 0.29 (95%CI 0.02–0.57), p = 0.038. Good rater-device agreement was found, κ_C = 0.62 (95%CI 0.15–1.10), p = 0.001.

Conclusion

The tibial internal rotation test shows increased tibial internal rotation in a small amount of patients with ACL injury. Even though no gold standard for assessment of increased tibial internal rotation of the knee is available yet, the test can be of additional value. It can be used for assessment of internal rotatory laxity of the knee as part of ALRI in addition to the pivot shift test. No clinical implications should yet be based on this test alone.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40634-018-0141-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Influence of Segond Fracture on Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of Segond fractures using computed tomography (CT) and to investigate the effects of Segond fractures on the outcomes of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for isolated ACL injuries.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and July 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 383 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction, who underwent CT scans immediately after surgery, and who were available at 2 years of follow-up. The absence or presence of a Segond fracture was confirmed using CT. The following parameters were evaluated in all patients at the 2-year follow-up visit: clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score) and knee joint stability (anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on Telos stress radiographs).

RESULTS

Among 383 patients with primary ACL tears, a Segond fracture was confirmed in 8.9% (n = 34) using 3-dimensional CT. We placed 349 patients into the group with ACL tears without Segond fractures (group A) and the other 34 into the group with ACL tears with Segond fractures (group B). Between the 2 groups, there were no significant differences in the postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score (P = .97), Lysholm score (P = .17), or Tegner activity score (P = .95). No significant differences in the anterior drawer test (P = .28), Lachman test (P = .45), pivot-shift test (P = .14), and side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on Telos stress radiographs (P = .93) between the 2 groups were found preoperatively and postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a Segond fracture did not affect knee joint stability in patients with ACL tears. Moreover, the 2 groups did not show significant differences in clinical scores or knee joint stability after undergoing ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Combined ACL reconstruction and Segond fracture fixation fails to abolish anterolateral rotatory instability

The Segond fracture (SF) is considered pathognomonic of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. However, the anatomy of the soft-tissue attachments responsible for the avulsion of SFs has been a cause of controversy. A 31-year-old male patient presented with an injury to his right knee that resulted in ACL tear and a SF. Open SF fixation and arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were performed. The anatomical dissection demonstrated that the avulsion of SFs had occurred because of the tibial attachment of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) with an intact Iliotibial band. At 1-year postoperative follow-up, the ACL graft had restored anterior tibial translation to within normal limits. However, residual rotational knee laxity was observed. This finding highlights that patients with SF may be at increased risk of persistent instability after ACL reconstruction. Consideration should be given to recession of the fixation or augmentation of the ALL when dealing with this injury pattern.

Underappreciated Factors to Consider in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Current Concepts Review

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) are being performed with increasing frequency. While many of these will have successful outcomes, failures will occur in a subset of patients who will require revision ACLRs. As such, the number of revision procedures will continue to rise as well. While many reviews have focused on factors that commonly contribute to failure of primary ACLR, including graft choice, patient factors, early return to sport, and technical errors, this review focused on several factors that have received less attention in the literature. These include posterior tibial slope, varus malalignment, injury to the anterolateral ligament, and meniscal injury or deficiency. This review also appraised several emerging techniques that may be useful in the context of revision ACL surgery. While outcomes of revision ACLR are generally inferior to those of primary procedures, identifying these potentially underappreciated contributing factors preoperatively will allow the surgeon to address them at the time of revision, ideally improving patient outcomes and preventing recurrent ACL failure.

How to Test the Anterolateral Ligament With Ultrasound

Ultrasonography (US) is a nonirradiating, low-cost, real-time imaging modality that has very good spatial resolution. US can be used to view the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and injuries to the ALL. Several authors have sought to analyze the anterolateral aspect of the knee using US with varying luck. All of them analyzed the ALL statically only. The goal of this Technical Note is to describe in detail the technique that we use to analyze the anterolateral aspect of the knee in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament tear. We use a simple technique that starts by locating the tibial end of the ALL. The lateral inferior genicular artery is a reliable landmark in this context. The analysis is dynamic in addition to being static. To determine if the ALL is injured, we look for a lack of tension on the ALL when the knee is internally rotated and for a Segond fracture. We believe that it is essential to start evaluating the ALL by its tibial end. US analysis of the ALL forms the basis for developing an appropriate "à la carte" treatment for the patient's injury.