High wear resistance of femoral components coated with titanium nitride: a retrieval analysis

Retrieval Analysis of Titanium Nitride Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants

BACKGROUND

The first generation of titanium nitride (TiN) coatings for orthopaedic implants was clinically introduced in the 1990s because of their promising biocompatibility, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance. This study evaluated the in vivo performance of early TiN-coated knee and hip implants, focusing on the bearing surfaces and mechanisms of in vivo damage.

METHODS

There were 13 TiN-coated implants (5 knee and 8 hip) retrieved from 8 patients as part of a multi-institutional implant retrieval program. The average implantation time was 4.25 years for knees and 17.5 years for hips. Implant revisions occurred for various reasons, including polyethylene wear, loosening, pain, infection, and instability. Components were examined using a semiquantitative scoring method, and surface roughness measurements were performed using white-light interferometry. Surface morphology, chemistry, and particle characterization were also assessed by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

For hips, mild corrosion was found on femoral head tapers, along with severe scratching on certain femoral heads. Knee implants exhibited low burnishing and scratching for both mechanisms. Roughness measurements (Sa) were 37.3 nm (interquartile range = 22.0 to 62.4) for hips and 85.3 nm (interquartile range = 66.3 to 110) for knees. The observed scratch depth in both hip and knee implants due to third-body particles ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 μm. The coating coverage remained intact in the majority of the implants, with 2 cases of small, localized cohesive chipping and substrate exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm the potential in vivo durability of early TiN coatings and will be useful in benchmarking wear tests for modern TiN-coated orthopaedic implants.

Isolation of TiNbN wear particles from a coated metal-on-metal bearing: Morphological characterization and in vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity in human osteoblasts

To improve the wear resistance of articulating metallic joint endoprostheses, the surfaces can be coated with titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN). Under poor tribological conditions or malalignment, wear can occur on these implant surfaces in situ. This study investigated the biological response of human osteoblasts to wear particles generated from TiNbN-coated hip implants. Abrasive particles were generated in a hip simulator according to ISO 14242-1/-2 and extracted with Proteinase K. Particle characteristics were evaluated by electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements. Human osteoblasts were exposed to different particle dilutions (1:20, 1:50, and 1:100), and cell viability and gene expression levels of osteogenic markers and inflammatory mediators were analyzed after 4 and 7 days. Using ICP-MS, EDS, and DLS measurements, ~70% of the particles were identified as TiNbN, ranging from 39 to 94 nm. The particles exhibited a flat and subangular morphology. Exposure to particles did not influence cell viability and osteoblastic differentiation capacity. Protein levels of collagen type 1, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand were almost unaffected. Moreover, the pro-inflammatory response via interleukins 6 and 8 was minor induced after particle contact. A high number of TiNbN wear particles only slightly affected osteoblasts' differentiation ability and inflammatory response compared to metallic particles. Nevertheless, further studies should investigate the role of these particles in peri-implant bone tissue, especially concerning other cell types.

Titanium nitride coating of pectus bar increases metal contamination after minimally-invasive repair of pectus excavatum

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies demonstrated a release of toxic metals, e.g. nickel and chromium, from stainless steel bars used for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). In the present study, we investigated the impact of titanium nitride coating on the metal release and exposure of MIRPE patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the courses of nickel and chromium levels in blood, urine and local tissue in patients undergoing MIRPE with a titanium nitride coated pectus bar between 03/2017 and 10/2018. Sample collection was scheduled prior to MIRPE, at defined postoperative time points and at bar removal. Additionally, we evaluated irritative symptoms. Results were compared to a control group who received uncoated stainless steel bars in a previous time period (03/2015-02/2017).

RESULTS

12 patients received coated pectus bars (mean age 15.7 years). The control group included 28 patients. After implantation of a titanium nitride coated bar, significant increase in systemic nickel and chromium levels after one, two and three years was noted. In an interim analysis one year after MIRPE, we observed patients with coated bars to have significantly elevated trace metal values compared to the control group. This elevation persisted throughout the observation period. Tissue metal values were also significantly increased. Irritative symptoms occurred significantly more often in study patients compared to controls (50.0% vs. 14.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coating of pectus bars with titanium nitride failed to reduce metal contamination after MIRPE. Instead, it resulted in a significant increase of trace metal levels after MIRPE, compared to patients with stainless steel bars, which may be explained by wear of the coating and inter-component mobilization processes.

Stability of ceramic coatings on retrieved knee prostheses

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty, femoral components with coated or oxidized surfaces are commonly used as alternative to CoCrMo in metal sensitive patients. Data on the in vivo behaviour of different coating types is, however, rare. Aim of the study was the investigation of coating stability with respect to implant and patient specific parameters.

METHODS

Coating thickness and coating thickness reduction, respectively, was measured at 37 retrieved femoral components with TiNbN, TiN, ZrN or oxidized zirconium (OxZr) surface by the crater grinding method. The results were correlated to surface type, manufacturer, time in vivo of the implant, patient body weight and patient activity.

RESULTS

Mean coating thickness reduction in the overall retrieval collection was 0.6 μm ± 0.8 μm. There was no correlation between coating thickness reduction and coating type, time in vivo, patient body weight, and patient activity. If grouped according to manufacturers, implants of one manufacturer showed an increased coating thickness reduction. 10 of 37 retrievals exhibited coating abrasion with exposure of the underlying alloy. TiNbN coatings showed the highest incidence (9/17) of coating abrasion. No coating breakthrough was observed in the ZrN or OxZr surfaces.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that TiNbN coatings should be optimized to improve their wear resistance in the long-term.

"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants."

BACKGROUND

Nitride-based ceramic coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of knee components, harden the metal surface and reduce CoCrMo exposure and metal ion release. However, the theoretical advantages of these ceramic coatings in TKA have yet to be fully elucidated. This systematic review aimed to provide clinical evidence on mid-term outcomes of ceramic-coated knee prostheses in comparison with uncoated standard CoCrMo knee prostheses in primary TKA. The hypothesis was that ceramic-coated implants can be used in primary TKA with no inferior outcomes compared to uncoated CoCrMo implants.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all clinical studies regarding primary TKA with ceramic-coated knee prostheses. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 to October 2020 to identify relevant studies for the first qualitative analysis. Using PICOS eligibility criteria, a subgroup of the selected studies was used to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 retrospective comparative studies and 1 prospective cross-sectional study. Pooled data overall included 321 coated TKAs vs. 359 uncoated TKAs and a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-10 years). No significant difference in the implant survival risk ratio with revision or reoperation due to any reason was found between coated and uncoated TKAs, even considering the RCT study subgroup with a risk ratio of 1.02 (P = 0.34). No significant differences were found for postoperative complications, clinical scores, or metal blood concentrations at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the statement that ceramic-coated TKAs are not inferior to uncoated TKAs, showing comparable survival rates, complication rates and clinical outcomes. There is strong evidence that ceramic-coated TKA does not improve the clinical results or survival rate in comparison with uncoated TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II,  Therapeutic.

No clinical difference at mid-term follow-up between TiN-coated versus uncoated cemented mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Nitride-based ceramic coating was introduced into surgical implants to improve hardness, reduce abrasion, and decrease the risk of metal-induced adverse reactions, especially for patients with suspected or identified metal hypersensitivity. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a titanium nitride (TiN) coated prosthesis with a mobile bearing design.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched-cohort study from a single center, comparing clinical outcomes between patients receiving either a TiN-coated versus an uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) prostheses for primary total knee replacement. Seventeen patients received the TiN prosthesis between 2015 and 2019. These were matched 1:2 with patients receiving uncoated mobile-bearing knee prostheses with the same design manufacturer.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients in the TiN group had complete 5-year follow-up data and were compared with 34 patients from the CoCrMo group. The Knee Society Score was 170.6 ± 28.0 (Function subscore 83.7 ± 17.5 and Knee subscore 86.9 ± 13.8) in the TiN group and 180.7 ± 49.4 (Function subscore 87.5 ± 14.3 and Knee subscore 93.2 ± 9.6) in CoCrMo group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.19). One patient underwent a revision for instability requiring the removal of the implant in the TiN group and none in the CoCrMo group. The survival rates were 92.9% (CI95% 77.3-100.0) and 100.0% in the TiN group and CoCrMo group respectively (p = 1.0).

DISCUSSION

TiN-coated TKA with mobile bearing resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, and a low revision rate, and there was no complication related to the coated implant. The use of TiN-coated prostheses in case of confirmed or suspected metal allergy provides satisfactory short-term clinic outcomes.

The Impact of Bias and Nitrogen Pressure on TiNbN Coatings in Arc-PVD Processes—A Multifactorial Study

Titanium-based nitride physical vapour deposition (PVD) coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN), are state-of-the-art solutions for surface modifications of CoCrMo-based implants for patients who are hypersensitive to metallic ions such as cobalt, chromium and nickel. Variations of the process parameters during the cathodic arc evaporation are known to exhibit an impact on the surface properties of coatings. The aim of this study was to characterise the effect of the substrate bias and the nitrogen pressure on the surface properties of TiNbN coatings deposited on CoCrMo alloys in a limited parameter set. Eighteen parameter sets were coated with TiNbN. The substrate bias (−100 to −200 V) and the nitrogen pressure (0.3–3.0 Pa) were selected following a randomised, multifactorial response surface test design. The coating thickness, roughness, hardness and scratch resistance were measured following standardised procedures. The structure of the coating was analysed by SEM and XRD. The substrate bias and the pressure exhibited a significant impact on the coating thickness and the surface roughness. The grain growth was predominantly impacted by the bias. The parameter variation did not show any significant impact on the XRD, hardness or scratch test results.

Current status and future potential of wear-resistant coatings and articulating surfaces for hip and knee implants

Hip and knee joint replacements are common and largely successful procedures that utilise implants to restore mobility and relieve pain for patients suffering from e.g. osteoarthritis. However, metallic ions and particles released from both the bearing surfaces and non-articulating interfaces, as in modular components, can cause hypersensitivity and local tissue necrosis, while particles originating from a polymer component have been associated with aseptic loosening and osteolysis. Implant coatings have the potential to improve properties compared to both bulk metal and ceramic alternatives. Ceramic coatings have the potential to increase scratch resistance, enhance wettability and reduce wear of the articulating surfaces compared to the metallic substrate, whilst maintaining overall toughness of the implant ensuring a lower risk of catastrophic failure of the device compared to use of a bulk ceramic. Coatings can also act as barriers to inhibit ion release from the underlying material caused by corrosion. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of wear-resistant coatings for joint replacements - both those that are in current clinical use as well as those under investigation for future use. While the majority of coatings belong predominantly in the latter group, a few coated implants have been successfully marketed and are available for clinical use in specific applications. Commercially available coatings for implants include titanium nitride (TiN), titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), oxidized zirconium (OxZr) and zirconium nitride (ZrN) based coatings, whereas current research is focused not only on these, but also on diamond-like-carbon (DLC), silicon nitride (SiN), chromium nitride (CrN) and tantalum-based coatings (TaN and TaO). The coating materials referred to above that are still at the research stage have been shown to be non-cytotoxic and to reduce wear in a laboratory setting. However, the adhesion of implant coatings remains a main area of concern, as poor adhesion can cause delamination and excessive wear. In clinical applications zirconium implant surfaces treated to achieve a zirconium oxide film and TiNbN coated implants have however been proven comparable to traditional cobalt chromium implants with regards to revision numbers. In addition, the chromium ion levels measured in the plasma of patients were lower and allergy symptoms were relieved. Therefore, coated implants could be considered an alternative to uncoated metal implants, in particular for patients with metal hypersensitivity. There have also been unsuccessful introductions to the market, such as DLC coated implants, and therefore this review also attempts to summarize the lessons learnt.

Ceramic Coating in Cemented Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Associated With Decreased Risk of Revision due to Early Prosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent and devastating causes of short-term revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In vitro evidence suggests ceramic surfaces demonstrate resistance to biofilm, but the clinical effect of bearing surface modifications on the risk of PJI remains unclear. This premier registry-based study examines the influence of ceramic bearing surface coatings on the outcome in cemented primary TKA.

METHODS

In total, 117,660 cemented primary TKAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis recorded in the German arthroplasty registry since 2012 were followed up for a maximum of 3 years. The primary endpoint was risk of revision for PJI on ceramic coated and uncoated cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral components. Propensity score matching for age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, depression and Elixhauser comorbidity index, and substratification on common design twins with and without coating was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 4637 TKAs (85.1% female) with a ceramic-coated femoral component were identified, 42 had been revised for PJI and 122 for other reasons at 3 years. No survival advantage due to the risk of revision for PJI could be determined for ceramic-coated components. Revision for all other reasons demonstrated a significant higher rate for TKAs with ceramic-coated components. However, the results of this were confounded by a strong prevalence (20.7% vs 0.3%) of metal sensitivity in the ceramic-coated group.

CONCLUSION

No evidence of reduced risk for PJI due to ceramic-coated implants in cemented primary TKA was found. Further analysis for revision reasons other than PJI is required.

No clinical difference between TiN-coated versus uncoated cementless CoCrMo mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty; 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Improvement of biomechanical properties of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) implant surface and reduction of adhesive wear is achieved by titanium-nitride (TiN) coating in vitro. Less pain, higher postoperative outcome scores and a lower revision rate after TKA with a TiN-coated CoCrMo TKA compared with uncoated CoCrMo TKA after 10-year follow-up was hypothesized.

METHODS

In a double-blinded RCT, 101 patients received a cementless mobile-bearing CoCrMo TKA, either TiN-coated or uncoated. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain and secondary outcome measures were the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), revision rate and adverse events. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years, postoperatively.

RESULTS

68 patients (67%) were available for 10-year follow-up. No difference was found in any of the assessed outcome measures with a mean decrease in VAS score (31.6 ± 22.9) and a mean increase in OKS (10.9 ± 8.4), KSS (29.3 ± 31.4), KSSK (26.4 ± 18.2) and KSSF (4.1 ± 22.9). Overall revision rate was 7% (coated 6% vs uncoated 8%) without additional revision procedures between 5 and 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The in vitro potential benefits of TiN coating did not result in better clinical outcome when compared to an uncoated cementless TKA. Pain, functional outcome and revision rates were comparable after 10-year follow-up. TiN-coated cementless TKA provides comparable good long-term results, similar to uncoated cementless CoCrMo TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, Therapeutic Study NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER: NL2887/NTR3033.

Retrieval study of commercially available knee implant coatings TiN, TiNbN and ZrN on TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6

BACKGROUND

Coated implant components for total knee arthroplasties are primarily used for metal-sensitive patients and are offered by different manufacturers. However, there is only little knowledge with respect to their coating design and supposed superior tribological performance. Our aim was to compare retrieved coated implants by identifying present damages, critical factors influencing the coating durability and their correlation to the clinical performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

28 retrieved knee endoprostheses from nine different manufacturers were analyzed for potential surface defects as well as the coating strategy for each manufacturer. The coating designs were investigated on preserved regions with regard to substrate and coating material, layer thickness and roughness using scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. Furthermore, the mechanical properties and adhesive strength of the layer were evaluated by nanoindentation and scratch testing. The friction performance of the coatings against ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) was investigated in a tribological test. In addition, clinical data were collected and evaluated for all patients.

RESULTS

Our cohort of 28 retrieved knee endoprostheses exhibited different damage patterns in the articulating area with an incidence of 79% for discoloration and 21% for coating delamination. All coatings presented droplets, macropores and pinholes in preserved areas, which can be attributed to the coating and post-polishing processes. Interestingly, the adhesive strength was significantly increased by 60.4% for titanium nitride coatings on TiAl6V4 alloy in comparison to CoCr28Mo6 substrates. The friction behavior of titanium nitride coatings against UHMWPE is similar to uncoated CoCr28Mo6 alloy and lowest for the ZrN multi-layer coating with a reduction of 14%.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that manufacturing related coating deposition defects can cause wear due to adhesive failure and corrosion underneath the coating layers. Adhesive strength was identified as a critical factor for coating durability. Minor adhesive strength was present on CoCr28Mo6 cast alloy in comparison to good adhesion of Ti-based coatings on TiAl6V4 wrought alloy. Based on our findings, this is consistent to higher prevalence rates of CoCr28Mo6/TiNbN coatings for gross delamination and pitting damage with increasing implantation time.

Titanium-Nitride Coating Does Not Result in a Better Clinical Outcome Compared to Conventional Cobalt-Chromium Total Knee Arthroplasty after a Long-Term Follow-Up: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: The impact of titanium nitride (TiN) coating on implant components is controversial. TiN coating is proposed as having superior biomechanical properties compared to conventional cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy. This study compared long-term clinical data as well as meteoro-sensitivity in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with either CoCr alloy or TiN coating. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, the clinically approved cemented “low contact stress” (LCS) TKA with conventional CoCr coating, was compared to un-cemented TiN-coated “advanced coated system” (ACS) TKA. Propensity score matching identified comparable patients based on their characteristics in a one-to-one ratio using the nearest-neighbor method. The final cohort comprised 260 knees in each cohort, with a mean follow-up of 10.1 ± 1.0 years for ACS patients and 14.9 ± 3.0 years for the LCS group. Physical examinations, meteoro-sensitivity, and knee scoring were assessed. Results: The clinical and functional Knee Society Score (KSS) (82.6 vs. 70.8; p < 0.001 and 61.9 vs. 71.1; p = 0.011), the postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (2.9 vs. 1.4; p = 0.002), and the postoperative Tegner Score (2.6 vs. 2.2; p = 0.001) showed significant intergroup differences. The postoperative Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was similar (79.9 vs. 81.3; p = 0.453) between groups. Meteoro-sensitivity of the artificial joint was significantly more prevalent in the ACS patient cohort (56% vs. 23%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests that TiN coating does not provide improved clinical outcomes in this patient cohort after a long-term follow-up. Interestingly, sensitivity to weather changes were more correlated with un-cemented ACS implants.

The Effect of N, C, Cr, and Nb Content on Silicon Nitride Coatings for Joint Applications

Ceramic coatings deposited on orthopedic implants are an alternative to achieve and maintain high wear resistance of the metallic device, and simultaneously allow for a reduction in metal ion release. Silicon nitride based (SiN_x) coatings deposited by high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) have shown potential for use in joint replacements, as a result of an improved chemical stability in combination with a good adhesion. This study investigated the effect of N, C, Cr, and Nb content on the tribocorrosive performance of 3.7 to 8.8 µm thick SiN_x coatings deposited by HiPIMS onto CoCrMo discs. The coating composition was assessed from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and the surface roughness by vertical scanning interferometry. Hardness and Young's modulus were measured by nanoindentation and coating adhesion was investigated by scratch tests. Multidirectional wear tests against ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene pins were performed for 2 million cycles in bovine serum solution (25%) at 37 °C, at an estimated contact pressure of 2.1 MPa. Coatings with a relatively low hardness tended to fail earlier in the wear test, due to chemical reactions and eventually dissolution, accelerated by the tribological contact. In fact, while no definite correlation could be observed between coating composition (N: 42.6-55.5 at %, C: 0-25.7 at %, Cr: 0 or 12.8 at %, and Nb: 0-24.5 at %) and wear performance, it was apparent that high-purity and/or -density coatings (i.e., low oxygen content and high nitrogen content) were desirable to prevent coating and/or counter surface wear or failure. Coatings deposited with a higher energy fulfilled the target profile in terms of low surface roughness (Ra < 20 nm), adequate adhesion (L_c2 > 30 N), chemical stability over time in the tribocorrosive environment, as well as low polymer wear, presenting potential for a future application in joint bearings.

Retrieval analysis of TiN (titanium nitride) coated knee replacements: Coating wear and degradation in vivo

INTRODUCTION

Titanium nitride (TiN) coatings are used in joint arthroplasty to minimize wear and reduce the allergenic potential of metal implants, yet little is known about their performance in knee arthroplasty. This retrieval study examined TiN coated knee replacements to verify in vivo wear and degradation of the coating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included total and unicompartmental mobile bearing knee replacements retrieved from five patients (eight components) after 13-21 months due to aseptic loosening or infection. Implants were examined using scanning (SEM) and optical microscopy, surface damage was assessed using a semiquantitative scoring system, adhesion was determined using indentation technique testing, surface roughness was measured using contact profilometry.

RESULTS

Although good coating adhesion and no gross failure were observed on all retrievals, coating wear and roughening were evident on tibial bearing surfaces. Multiple microscopic defects (pinholes, craters, titanium droplets) were observed on all samples in SEM studies. Microscopic wear scars indicated that particulate defects significantly contributed to coating wear, acting as third bodies.

CONCLUSION

TiN coatings of knee replacements undergo wear and degradation related to presence of third bodies and microscopic defects on their surface. Since coating integrity may be compromised in vivo, such implants should be used with caution in metal sensitive patients.

Mid-term clinical and radiological results do not differ between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using titanium-nitride-coated posterior-stabilized prostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study was performed to prospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results between mobile-bearing (MB) and fixed-bearing (FB) TKAs using ceramic titanium nitride (TiN)-coated prostheses.

METHODS

Seventy MB and 70 FB TKAs using TiN-coated prostheses (ACS^®) were prospectively evaluated. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. Clinically, the Knee Society knee and function scores, WOMAC, and range of motion (ROM) were compared. Considering the possibility of a kinematic change in the polyethylene (PE) insert and a decrease in ROM following MB TKA, serial changes in the ROM were also compared. The thickness of the PE insert was compared according to the size of the femoral component. Radiographically, the alignment and positions of the components were compared.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the two groups in clinical scores or ROM (n.s.). The maximum flexion increased from 133.5° ± 8.3° to 137.6° ± 5.5° across all time points in the MB group. The serial maximum flexion angles did not differ between the two groups over time (n.s.). The average thickness of the PE insert was greater in the MB group (12.0 ± 1.9 vs. 11.2 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, p = 0.008), especially when a large femoral component was used (12.7 ± 1.9 vs. 11.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.005). The pre- and postoperative mechanical axes and positions of the components did not differ between the two groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

TiN-coated MB TKA showed no significant advantage over FB TKA. The selection of bearing design would be clinically insignificant when using the TiN-coated TKA prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

New alternate bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: A review of the current literature

As indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have expanded, the incidence of THA has increased among younger patients, who live longer and tend to place more strain on implants via higher activity levels. This demographical shift accentuates the importance of advancing innovation to ensure implant longevity for younger and more active patients. Future innovation, as it pertains to THA components, is likely to focus on modifying implant designs and tribology in conjunction with identification and application of newer biomaterials. By reviewing the literature for development status of various materials and novel design advancements in THA component outside of the standard highly cross-linked polyethylene, this investigation provided an update on the current and future status of design initiatives as they pertain to THA. Though the highlighted alternative bearing surfaces have shown promising in vitro and limited, yet encouraging clinical data, they lack larger and longer-term clinical trial results. Further research and innovation is warranted to identify the optimal bearing surface to most effectively accommodate for the trend of younger and more active patients undergoing THA. Implant longevity is crucial if the clinical success of THA is to be maintained.