The original Akagi line is the most reliable: a systematic review of landmarks for rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA

Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Purpose

For primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an increasing trend towards patient-specific alignment strategies such as kinematic alignment (KA) and inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), which by restoring native joint mechanics may yield higher patient satisfaction rates. Second, the most recent Australian joint registry report describes favourable revision rates for conventionally instrumented TKA compared to technology-assisted techniques such as those using navigation, robotics or custom-cutting blocks. The aim of this technique article is to describe in detail a surgical technique for TKA that: (1) utilises the principles of iKA and (2) uses conventionally instrumented guided resections thereby avoiding the use of navigation, robotics or custom blocks.

Methods

A TKA technique is described, whereby inverse kinematic principles are utilised and patient-specific alignment is achieved. Additionally, the patellofemoral compartment of the knee is restored to the native patellofemoral joint line. The sequenced technical note provided may be utilised for cemented or cementless components; cruciate retaining or sacrificing designs and for fixed or rotating platforms.

Results

An uncomplicated, robust and reproducible technique for TKA is described.

Discussion

Knee arthroplasty surgeons may wish to harness the emerging benefits of both a conventionally instrumented technique and a patient-specific alignment strategy.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Intraoperative reliability of the tibial anteroposterior axis "Akagi's Line" in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The tibial anatomical anteroposterior (AP) axis "Akagi's line" was originally defined on computed tomography (CT) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, its intraoperative reproducibility remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the intraoperative reproducibility of the Akagi's line and its effect on postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods

This prospective study included 171 TKAs. The rotational angle of the intraoperative Akagi's line relative to the original Akagi's line (RAA) defined on CT was measured. The RAA was calculated based on the tibial component rotational angles relative to the intraoperative Akagi's line measured using the navigation system and CT. The effects of RAA on postoperative clinical outcomes and rotational alignments of components were also evaluated.

Results

The mean absolute RAA (standard deviation) value was 5.5° (3.9°). The range of RAA was 22° internal rotation to 16° external rotation. Intraoperative Akagi's line outliers (RAA > 10°) were observed in 14% of the knees (24 knees). In outlier analysis, the tibial component rotation angle was externally rotated 6.5° (5.6°) in the outlier group and externally rotated 3.7° (4.2°) in the nonoutlier group (≤10°), with a significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, the outlier group (RAA > 10°) showed lower postoperative clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The original Akagi's line defined on CT showed insufficient reproducibility intraoperatively. The poor intraoperative detection of Akagi's line could be the reason for the tibial component rotational error and worse postoperative clinical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Coronal Knee Alignment and Tibial Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patients with End-Stage Osteoarthritis

Several studies have found a relationship between the rotational anatomy of the distal femur and the overall coronal lower limb alignment in knees with osteoarthritis (OA). Less is known about the rotation of the proximal tibia, especially in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), where one of the goals of the surgery is to achieve the appropriate component-to-component rotation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the coronal alignment of the lower extremity and the relative proximal tibial rotation. A prospective cohort study of patients with an end-stage OA scheduled for TKA was conducted. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan and a standing X-ray of both lower limbs. A relative femorotibial rotation was measured separately for mechanical and kinematic alignment. A statistically significant correlation was found between the tibial varus and the external tibial rotation (p < 0.001). Out of 14 knees with high tibial varus (>5°), 13 (93%) and 7 (50%) knees had >10° of femorotibial rotation for the mechanical and kinematic alignment landmarks, respectively. In order to keep the component-to-component rotation within the 10° margin, more internal rotation of the tibial component is required in knees with higher tibial varus.

High three-dimensional accuracy of component placement and lower limb alignment using a robotic arm-assisted system and gap-balancing instrument in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

It was hypothesized that robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) using additionally a gap-balancing instrumentation will show high accuracy in executing the planning in femoral and tibial component placement throughout the range of knee motion (ROM) during TKA surgery.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data were analysed for patients undergoing RA-TKA. A cruciate retaining cemented design was implanted using the MAKO® robotic system. Lower limb alignment at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of flexion was recorded at the beginning of surgery and finally after implantation of the components. A ligament tensioner was inserted after tibial precut to measure the extension and flexion gap, and final component placement was planned based on 3D CT images. Femoral and tibial component placement was measured in all three planes.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included (mean age 69.4 ± 9 years; 44 male, 60 female). The difference in component placement after planning and final implantation showed less valgus of 0.7° ± 1.4° (p < 0.001), less external rotation of 0.6° ± 1.9° (p = 0.001) and less flexion of 0.9° ± 1.8° (p < 0.001) for the femoral component. The tibial component was placed in more varus of 0.2° ± 0.9° (p = 0.056) and more posterior slope of 0.5° ± 0.9° (p < 0.001). The lower limb alignment in extension was 4.4° ± 5.2° of varus of the native knee and changed to 1.2° ± 1.9° of varus after TKA (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted TKA helps to achieve the target of alignment and component placement very close to the planning. It allows optimal component placement of off-the-shelf implants respecting patient's specific anatomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Multi-Planar Expansion of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee Classification? A Computed Tomographic Study Indicates No Significant Correlation With Alignment Parameters in Other Planes

BACKGROUND

The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification categorizes knee phenotypes based on constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle or aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO). This study aimed to determine if sagittal and rotational knee alignments vary among CPAK types in order to establish whether this classification should be expanded beyond coronal plane assessment.

METHODS

Coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment measurements were made and CPAK types were calculated from computed tomographic data of 437 patients (509 knees) who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Differences in femoral, tibial, and tibio-femoral angular measurements were compared across CPAK types, and correlations were made to aHKA and JLO. Nonparametric and linear regression tests were used to analyze between-type differences.

RESULTS

There were no differences in tibial slope or femoral rotational measures across CPAK phenotypes. However, CPAK Type III knees had a greater tibio-femoral rotation mean difference than CPAK Type I, II, IV, and V knees (P < .05). We also found increased femoral flexion in Type I knees when compared to Type VI knees (P = .01). The aHKA had a weak correlation with femoral flexion angle, and JLO had a weak correlation with femoral posterior condylar axis to tibial antero-posterior axis angle.

CONCLUSION

Few clinically important differences in sagittal and rotational alignments were found between CPAK types, indicating that CPAK phenotype has little correlation to 3-dimensional alignment characteristics. Need for an expansion of the CPAK classification beyond coronal plane alignment is not supported from these results.

3-dimensional computer tomography is more accurate than traditional long-leg radiographs in the planning and evaluation of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study on 121 knees

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accurate measuring tools are essential in preoperative planning and for the study of the association between postoperative alignment and clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to describe a simple method to measure preoperative hip-knee-femoral shaft (HKFS) angle and postoperative coronal alignment in TKA with the use of standard 3D CT and to compare preoperative HKFS angles and postoperative coronal alignment measured with the 3D CT technique and with standing long-leg hip-knee-ankle (HKA) radiographs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HKA radiographs and 3D CT were taken preoperatively and 3 months after the operation in 121 knees. The interrater reliability for the 3D CT method was calculated with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The preoperative HKFS angles and the postoperative deformity measured with the 2 methods were compared and illustrated on Bland-Altman plots, frequency tables, and by Cohen's kappa coefficients (k).

RESULTS

The 3D CT method was feasible in all knees and the ICC was excellent. Mean (SD, range) difference in HKFS angle measured on HKA radiographs and on 3D CT was -0.3° (0.9°, -4.1° to 2.4°). Mean (SD, range) difference in postoperative deformity was 0.1° (1.6°, -5° to 6°). The 95% limits of agreement were 1.4° and -2° for HKFS and ±3° for postoperative alignment. The agreement in outlier (≥ 3°) identification was moderate with a k (95% confidence interval) of 0.48 (0.32-0.64).

CONCLUSION

3-dimensional computer tomography was feasible and was shown to be more accurate than traditional long-leg radiographs.

The footprint of the anterior horn of medial meniscus: A novel and reliable landmark for the tibial vertical cut in Oxford mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Tibial vertical cut is crucial for rotational position and bony coverage in Oxford mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to determine whether the footprint of the anterior horn of medial meniscus (FAM) is a reliable landmark for tibial vertical cut.

METHODS

The FAM and the line through FAM and the edge of anterior cruciate ligament insertion (FAMA line) were identified by dissection five knee joint specimens. The angle between FAMA line and standard Akagi's line was measured. From 2022 to 2023, 64 patients (74 knees) diagnosed as anteromedial osteoarthritis were included to undergo primary Oxford medial UKA by two surgeons (Group 1 and 2), using FAMA line as a landmark for tibial vertical cut. The anteroposterior (AP) length, mediolateral (ML) length of tibial cut and tibial prothesis were measured by vernier caliper. ML/AP ratio was also calculated, and data were compared intragroup and intergroup. Mediolateral position and external rotation of tibial components were assessed postoperatively.

RESULTS

FAMA line was parallel to standard Akagi's line. No significant differences were found in AP and ML lengths between tibial cut and tibial component (AP different value = 0.007 ± 0.154 cm, P = 0.674, ML different value = 0.020 ± 0.195 cm, P = 0.155). The ML/AP ratio was similar between the two groups (P = 0.141, 0.646, 0.255, 0.607, 0.384, size AA ∼ D). No significant difference was found in mediolateral position (0.87 ± 0.03 vs. 0.86 ± 0.03, P = 0.156) and external rotation (6.88 ± 2.08 vs. 6.68 ± 2.22, P = 0.746) of the tibial component between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The FAM is a reliable landmark for tibial vertical cut in Oxford UKA.

Is the Akagi Line a Reliable Landmark for Adjusting the Rotational Axis of the Tibial Component in Patients with Patellofemoral Instability?

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate whether the Akagi line is a reliable anatomic landmark for adjusting the rotational axis of the tibial component in patients with patellofemoral (PF) malalignment.

Materials and methods

This retrospective case-control study included 86 patients with PF instability and 129 controls. On the superimposed axial CT images, TT-TG, TT-PCL, nTT-TG, nTT-PCL, knee joint rotation, and the angle between the Akagi line and surgical transepicondylar axis (Akagi/sTEA angle) were measured. In addition, a modified Akagi line, drawn 1 cm medial to the patellar tendon attachment, was defined, and the angle between the new Akagi line and sTEA (mAkagi/sTEA angle) was also measured and compared between groups.

Results

There were 86 patients (47 females, 39 males) in the case group and 129 patients (56 females, 73 males) in the control group with a mean age of 35.7 ± 17.9 years and 41.1 ± 18.8 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Radiologic variables of PF alignment (TT-TG, TT-PCL, nTT-TG, nTT-PCL, and knee joint rotation) were significantly abnormal in the case group (p < 0.001 for all variables). The Akagi/sTEA angle was significantly higher in the case group, resulting in 89.5% external malrotation of the tibial component (> 10°). However, the tibial component was 96.5% aligned correctly (between 10° external and 3° internal rotation) in the control group. Using the modified Akagi line significantly improved the rotational alignment, and normal tibial rotation increased to 93.3% of the case group. The Akagi/sTEA angle strongly correlated with the knee rotation (rho: 0.735, p: 0.001), TT-TG (rho: 0.715, p: 0.001) and nTT-TG (rho: 0.783, p: 0.001). But the TT-PCL (rho: 0.459, p: 0.001) and nTT-PCL (rho: 0.589, p: 0.001) had a medium correlation.

Conclusions

The Akagi line might cause unacceptable external rotation of the tibial component in patients with PF malalignment. The use of the modified Akagi line described in this study may be a solution for the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components in TKA.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Kinematic comparison between the knee after bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and the native knee: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Although bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) is expected to provide kinematics similar to those of the normal knee, there are limited data available for comparison of the kinematics of the knee after BCS-TKA with those of the normal knee. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether the knee after BCS-TKA are the same as those of the native knee.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen cadavers underwent TKA using a BCS-type prosthesis with navigation system. Anteroposterior translation of the femur and internal rotation of the tibia were evaluated using the navigation system.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in anteroposterior translation of the femur between the native knee and the knee after BCS-TKA in the early flexion phase (0°-30°) or in the deep flexion phase (over 100°). In the middle flexion phase (40°-90°), the knee after BCS-TKA was placed significantly more anteriorly than the native knee. The knee after BCS-TKA also showed a gradual internal rotation pattern similar to that of the native knee but the total tibial internal rotation angle was significantly smaller than that of the native knee. At each angle from 0° to 120° of flexion, internal rotation of the knee after BCS-TKA was significantly greater than that of the native knee.

CONCLUSION

Kinematics of BCS-TKA is close to that of the native knee. However, there is a statistically significant difference in AP position of the femur during mid flexion and initial rotational position of the tibia between the BCS-TKA knee and the native knee.

The language of knee alignment : updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From 'mechanical' to 'adjusted mechanical' to 'restricted kinematic' to 'unrestricted kinematic' - and how constitutional alignment relates to these - there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102-108.

A computed tomographic evaluation of femoral and tibial rotational reference axes in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

 The surgical trans epicondylar axis (sTEA) is considered the gold standard for optimum rotation of the femoral component; however, no consensus exists on tibial component positioning. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship of sTEA to various femoral and tibial reference axes in varus osteoarthritis (OA) knees and (ii) to study the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the axis relationships.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 The study was done on preoperative computerised tomogram (CT) scans of 110 varus knees to assess the rotational relationships respectively of femoral side sTEA with whitesides line (WSL), posterior condylar axis (PCA), clinical trans epicondylar axis (cTEA) and on the tibial side sTEA with posterior tibial margin (PTM), anterior condylar axis (ACA), Akagi's line and line from the geometric centre of the tibial plateau to 1/3rd tibial tubercle (line GC 1/3rd TT).

RESULTS

 On the femoral side the mean angles of sTEA with WSL, PCA, cTEA were 95.64° ± 2.85°, 1.77° ± 1.88°, 4.19° ± 0.99° respectively. On the tibial side, the mean angles of sTEA with, PTM, ACA, Akagi's line, and line GC 1/3rd TT were 1.10° ± 4.69°, 11.98° ± 4.51°, 2.43° ± 4.35°, 16.04° ± 5.93° respectively.

CONCLUSION

 Contrary to the generalization, TEA has variable relationships. The surgical trans epicondylar axis was not at the assumed 3° of external rotation to PCA in 85% of knees, nor perpendicular to WSL in >95% of knees. Of the four tibial axes, Akagi's line was the least variable with sTEA. Furthermore, surgeons should also be aware of the multiple reference axes and the range of deviation from sTEA to optimize the rotational alignment of components.

Correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

50 TKA patients from a regional hospital were enrolled in the study. The following component alignments were measured from radiological data acquired within 1 week after surgery: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial distal femoral angle (MDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral flexion-extension angle (FEA), tibial slope angle (TSA), femoral rotational angle (FRA) and tibial rotational angle (TRA). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system was used to assess clinical outcomes after 1 year, with patients being divided into three groups (excellent, good and not good) according to the HSS scores. Difference analysis and linear correlation analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed significant differences in MDFA (p = 0.050) and FEA (p = 0.001) among the three patient groups. It was also found that the total HSS had only a moderate correlation with FEA (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), but FEA had a positive linear correlation with pain scores (r = 0.347, p = 0.013), function scores (r = 0.535, p = 0.000), ROM scores (r = 0.368, p = 0.009), muscle scores (r = 0.354, p = 0.012) and stability scores (r = 0.312, p = 0.028). A larger MDFA was associated with lower FE deformity scores (r = -0.289, p = 0.042) and the TSA had a positive influence on the ROM (r = 0.436, p = 0.002). Also, changes in FRA produced a consequent change in the FE deformity score (r = 0.312, p = 0.027), and the muscle strength scores increased as TRA increased (r = 0.402, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the FEA plays a significant role in clinical outcomes after TKA. Surgical techniques and tools may need to be improved to accurately adjust the FEA to improve joint functionality and patient satisfaction.

Different rotational alignment of tibial component should be selected for varied tibial tubercle locations in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to identify how the accuracy of the tibial rotation reference axes varied in populations with different tibial tubercle locations. We hypothesized that the accuracy of the axes of tibial rotation would be affected by the changes of tibial tubercle locations.

METHODS

Surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), medial third of the patellar tendon (1/3MPT), medial third of the tibial tuberosity (1/3MTT), medial border of the tibial tuberosity (MTT) and Akagi line were drawn. The angle between SEA and horizontal line with the angle between the four tibial rotation axes and the horizontal line was compared by T test. Then, the correlation between TTTG with the angles between the four axes and SEA vertical lines was analyzed. The TTTG was divided into three subgroups (TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, TTTG ≥ 15 mm), then t test was performed for the angles between the vertical lines of the SEA and the four rotation axes of the tibia in each group.

RESULTS

Among the four tibial rotation axes, only the difference between MTT and the line perpendicular to SEA had no statistical significance (NS.). The four tibial rotational axes were all positively correlated with TTTG (p < 0.001). When TTTG ≥ 15 mm, Akagi line was 2.5° ± 6.9°internally rotated to the line perpendicular to SEA, while the 1/3MPT and MTT was 0.9° ± 5.3°and 1.3° ± 5.9°externally rotated to the line perpendicular to the SEA when TTTG < 10 mm and 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MTT showed the best consistency with SEA. TT-TG had a significant positive correlation with all four tibial rotational axes. In patients with TTTG < 10 mm, 10 mm ≤ TTTG < 15 mm and TTTG ≥ 15 mm, the 1/3MPT, MTT and Akagi line demonstrated good alignment consistency with SEA, respectively.

Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS) or robot-assisted surgery (RAS) enable more accurate rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared to conventional instrumentation, in terms of deviation from the planned target and the proportion of outliers from the target zone.

METHODS

The authors independently conducted three structured electronic literature searches using the PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 2007 to 2020. Studies were included if they compared rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate during TKA using conventional instrumentation versus PSI, CAS, and/or RAS, and reported deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate in terms of absolute angles and/or number of outliers. Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two researchers according to the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, that reported on 2925 knees, were eligible for this systematic review, of which 6 studies used PSI, and 9 used CAS. No studies were found for RAS. Of the studies that reported on angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment, most found smaller deviations using PSI (0.5° to 1.4°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.0° to 1.6°). All studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), found lower rates of outliers using PSI (0 to 22%) compared to conventional instrumentation (5 to 96%). Most studies reported smaller angular deviation from preoperatively planned rotational alignment using CAS (0.1° to 6.9°) compared to conventional instrumentation (1.1° to 7.8°). Of the studies that reported on proportions of outliers from a target zone (± 3°), most found fewer outliers using CAS (10 to 61%) compared to conventional instrumentation (17 to 78%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that both CAS and PSI can improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate by decreasing angular deviation from the preoperatively planned target and reducing the proportion of outliers from the target zone. The clinical relevance is that PSI and CAS can improve alignment, though the thresholds necessary to grant better outcomes and survival remain unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Gender differences affect the location of the patellar tendon attachment site for tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

This study was carried out to investigate the accuracy of referring different locations of the patellar tendon attachment site and the geometrical center of the osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment and observe the influences of gender differences on the results.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of 135 osteoarthritis patients (82 females and 53 males) with varus deformity was obtained to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) models preoperatively. The medial boundary, medial one-sixth, and medial one-third of the patellar tendon attachment site were marked on the tibia. These points were projected on the tibial osteotomy plane and connected to the geometrical center (GC) of the osteotomy plane or the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to construct six tibial rotational axes (Akagi line, MBPT, MSPT1, MSPT2, MTPT1 and MTPT2). The mismatch angle between the vertical line of the SEA projected on the proximal tibial osteotomy surface and six different reference axes was measured. In additional, the effect of gender differences on rotational alignment for tibial component were assessed.

Results

Relative to the SEA, rotational mismatch angles were − 1.8° ± 5.1° (Akagi line), − 2.5° ± 5.3° (MBPT), 2.8° ± 5.3° (MSPT1), 4.5° ± 5.4° (MSPT2), 7.3° ± 5.4° (MTPT1), and 11.6° ± 5.8° (MTPT2) for different tibial rotational axes in all patients. All measurements differed significantly between the male and female. The tibial rotational axes with the least mean absolute deviation for the female or male were Akagi line or MSPT, respectively. There was no significant difference in whether the GC of the osteotomy surface or the midpoint of PCL termination was chosen as the posterior anatomical landmark when the medial boundary or medial one-sixth point of the patellar tendon attachment site was selected as the anterior anatomical landmark.

Conclusion

When referring patellar tendon attachment site as anterior anatomical landmarks for tibial rotational alignment, the influence of gender difference on the accuracy needs to be taken into account. The geometric center of the tibial osteotomy plane can be used as a substitute for the middle of the PCL termination when reference the medial boundary or medial one-sixth of the patellar tendon attachment site.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03248-5.

Patellar dislocation is associated with increased tibial but not femoral rotational asymmetry

PURPOSE

Patellar dislocation is associated with a range of anatomical abnormalities affecting the trochlea, extensor mechanism and the tibia. The relationship between patellofemoral instability and rotational abnormalities of the posterior condyles, trochlear groove and proximal tibia has not been adequately determined. This study aimed to identify the frequency and severity of anatomical risk factors to determine their relative contribution to patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

A retrospective morphological study was undertaken comparing multiple anatomical measurements with magnetic resonance imaging of 50 patients with patellofemoral instability to an age- and gender-matched Control group (n = 50). Several techniques were assessed measuring both femoral and tibial axial asymmetry. A new measurement, tibial rotational asymmetry, comparing a line between the midpoints of the collateral ligaments to the axis between the patellar tendon and posterior cruciate ligament, was assessed for its association with patellofemoral instability.

RESULTS

Compared to the controls, the patellofemoral instability group demonstrated a significant difference in tibial rotational asymmetry, with a mean of 2.9° (SD 3.2°) externally rotated vs - 1.6° (SD 2.2°) in the control group. Significant differences were also demonstrated regarding the sulcus angle, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance, patellar size and the Insall-Salvati ratio. There were no differences between groups regarding the lengths of the posterior condyles, the heights of the trochlear ridges or lateralisation of the trochlear groove. Further analysis of the patellofemoral instability group revealed a subgroup of males with normal anatomy (7/50) and a subgroup of females with isolated patella alta (7/50).

CONCLUSION

Patellofemoral instability is associated with tibial rotational asymmetry due to lateralisation of the tibial tubercle. It is also associated with patella alta and reduced trochlear groove depth. The femoral axial shape is otherwise unchanged.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Soft-tissue landmarks for tibial baseplate rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric study

The tip of the tibial tubercle (TTT) is used to assess tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, it can be difficult to palpate and visualize intraoperatively. Several more easily accessible soft-tissue structures have been proposed as intraoperative assessments, including the patellar tendon's medial border (MBPT) and the junction of the medial third of the patellar tendon (mt-PT). No studies have described the relationship between the TTT and these proposed landmarks. The aims of the study were to (1) determine the relationship of the soft-tissue landmarks to the TTT and (2) identify any sex differences in these measures. Measurements of the position of these soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT were made on 56 cadaveric knees (28 female) by two observers at the level of the standard tibial cut (10 mm distal to the lateral tibial plateau). The results obtained were compared by sex and side. On average, 50.7% (SD 6.79, range 33.1%-63.1%) of the patellar tendon footprint was medial to the TTT. There were no significant differences between the sexes or left and right lower limbs. However, there was large variability in the position of all the soft-tissue landmarks relative to the TTT. The results indicate that, on average, the patellar tendon footprint is evenly spread around the TTT. However, there is a large variability in the anatomical relationship between the soft-tissue landmarks and the TTT. Caution is advised if relying on these structures intraoperatively.

Tibial component rotation alters soft tissue balance in a cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Our aim was to understand whether using different landmarks for tibial component rotation influenced articular contact pressures in a balanced total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twelve patients underwent TKA (Triathlon CR, Stryker Inc., Mahwah, NJ) and contact pressures were assessed using a wireless sensor. Robotic arm assisted TKA using a functional alignment technique was performed, with balanced gaps between medial and lateral compartments. Compartment pressures were measured with the trial tibial component rotated to Akagi's line and to Insall's axis respectively. Rotating the tibial component to Akagi's line resulted in a significantly greater proportion of knees being balanced and lower contact pressures than when the tibial component was rotated to Insall's axis at 10°, 45° and 90° of flexion (p < 0.05). Medial compartment pressures were significantly increased in 10° of flexion, as were lateral compartment pressures in all positions when the tibial component was aligned to Insall's axis (p < 0.05). The mean difference in rotation observed with the two landmarks was 6.9° (range 4.1-9.1°). Rotational alignment of the tibial component using Akagi's line reduced contact pressures, improved balance and reduced the need for soft tissue release when compared with Insall's axis in robotic arm assisted TKA.

[Accuracy of patellar tendon at the attachment as anatomic landmark for rotational alignment of tibial component]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of the modified Akagi line which referenced the patellar tendon at the attachment and the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface for tibial rotational alignment.

METHODS

Between July 2021 and December 2021, 72 patients who underwent three-dimension (3D) CT for varus osteoarthritis knees were enrolled. Among 72 patients, 18 were male and 54 were female with a mean age of 64.9 years (range, 47-84 years). The preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle ranged from 0° to 26°, with a mean of 9.3°. CT images were imported into Mimics 21.0 medical image control system to establish 3D models of the knees. The prominent point of lateral epicondyle and the medial epicondylar sulcus were identified in femoral 3D models to construct the surgical transepicondylar axis and the vertical line of its projection [anteroposterior (AP) axis]. In tibial 3D models, the patellar tendon at the attachment was used as anatomical landmarks to construct rotational alignment for tibial component, including the line connecting the medial border of the patellar tendon at the attachment (C) and the middle (O) of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion (Akagi line), the line connecting the point C and the geometric center (GC) of the tibial osteotomy plane [medial border axis of the patellar tendon (MBPT)], the line connecting the medial sixth point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and the point GC [medial sixth axis of the patellar tendon (MSPT)], the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point O [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 1 (MTPT1)], and the line connecting the medial third point of the patellar tendon at the attachment and point GC [medial third axis of the patellar tendon 2 (MTPT2)]. The angles between the five reference axes and the AP axis were measured, and the distribution of the rotational mismatch angles with the AP axis was counted (≤3°, 3°-5°, 5°-10°, and >10°).

RESULTS

Relative to the AP axis, the Akagi line and MBPT were internally rotated (1.6±5.9)° and (2.4±6.9)°, respectively, while MSPT, MTPT1, and MTPT2 were externally rotated (5.4±6.6)°, (7.0±5.8)°, and (11.9±6.6)°, respectively. There were significant differences in the rotational mismatch angle and its distribution between reference axes and the AP axis ( F=68.937, P<0.001; χ ²=248.144, P<0.001). The difference between Akagi line and MBPT showed no significant difference ( P=0.067), and the differences between Akagi line and MSPT, MTPT1, MTPT2 were significant ( P<0.012 5).

CONCLUSION

When the position of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion can not be accurately identified on total knee arthroplasty, MBPT can be used as the modified Akagi line in reference to the geometrical center point of the tibial osteotomy surface to construct a reliable rotational alignment of the tibial component.

A novel anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty: An upright weight-bearing computed tomography analysis

BACKGROUND

The traditional anteroposterior (AP) axis (i.e., Akagi's line) has been widely used as the tibial component AP axis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this AP axis has been defined based on computed tomography (CT) in a non-weight-bearing supine position. In this study, AP axes of the tibial plateau from upright CT in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions were determined and compared.

METHODS

This study included 43 knees from 23 healthy volunteers. CT images were obtained in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing standing positions using a 320-detector row upright CT scanner. The line perpendicular to surgical transepicondylar axis projected onto the tibia plateau was determined as the AP axis in upright weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Angular differences between these two conditions were measured.

RESULTS

The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 7.4 ± 4.3° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Distance between the traditional and upright weight-bearing AP axis was 2.9 ± 1.6 mm at the edge of the tibial plateau. The upright non-weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 3.5 ± 4.1° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Mean angular difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions was 3.9 ± 4.1°.

CONCLUSIONS

The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in 7.4° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis, showing one-seventh of the tibial tuberosity away from the medial border of the tibial tubercle, which represents a practical landmark for the tibial component AP axis during TKA.

Posterior rim loading of a low-conforming tibial insert in unrestricted kinematic alignment is caused by rotational alignment of an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment

PURPOSE

Because different targets are used for internal-external rotation, an asymmetric baseplate designed for mechanical alignment may lead to under-coverage and concomitant posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment following unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA. Recognizing that such loading can lead to premature wear and/or subsidence, our aim was to determine the cause(s) so that occurrence could be remedied. Our hypothesis was that baseplate design features such as asymmetric shape when aligned in KA would consistently contribute to posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment.

METHODS

Based on analysis of fluoroscopic images of 50 patients performing dynamic, weight bearing deep knee bend and step up and of postoperative CT images, five possible causes were investigated. Causes included internal rotation of the baseplate when positioned in KA; posterior position of the lateral femoral condyle at extension; internal tibial rotation with flexion; internal rotational deviation of the baseplate from the KA rotation target; and posterior slope.

RESULTS

The incidence of posterior rim loading was 18% (9 of 50 patients). When positioned in KA, the asymmetric baseplate left 15% versus 10% of the AP depth of the lateral compartment uncovered posteriorly for posterior rim loading and non-posterior rim loading groups, respectively (p = 0.009). The lateral femoral condyle at extension was more posterior by 4 mm for the posterior rim loading group (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior rim loading in the lateral compartment was caused in part by the asymmetric design of the tibial baseplate designed for mechanical alignment which was internally rotated when positioned in KA thus under-covering a substantial percentage of the posterior lateral tibia. This highlights the need for new, asymmetric baseplates designed to maximize coverage when used in KA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component referring to the tibial tubercle during total knee arthroplasty: the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove can be an aid

Background

There is no consensus on anatomic landmarks or reference axes with which to accurately align rotational position of tibial component. Using the tibial tubercle, commonly referring to the Akagi line and the Insall line, for anatomic reference was widely accepted. However, it is unknown about the predictors that may affect the reliability of using the tibial tubercle for aligning tibial component rotation. The aims of our study were (1) to investigate the reproducibility and accuracy of using the tibial tubercle for aligning tibial component rotation and (2) to determine predictors resulting in discrepancies of the tibial component rotation when referring to the tibial tubercle.

Method

A total of 160 patients with osteoarthritis were recruited before total knee arthroplasty. The angle α formed by the tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis and the Akagi line and the angle β formed by the tibial AP axis and the Insall line were measured to quantify the discrepancies of the Akagi line and the Insall line. Independent variables, including the tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), tibial tubercle to posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL), and knee rotation angle (KRA), hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and tibial bowing (TB), were measured. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression analysis were calculated to assess relationships between independent variables and the two defined angles.

Results

All defined measurement were available for 140 patients. The Akagi line rotated internally with 1.03° ± 4.25° in regard to the tibial AP axis. The Insall line rotated externally in regard to the tibial AP axis with 7.93° ± 5.36°. Three variables, including TT-TG, TT-PCL, and KRA, tended to be positively correlated with the angle α and the angle β. In terms of a cutoff of TT-TG = 9 mm, 100% cases and 97% cases for using the Akagi line and Insall line, respectively, were located in the defined safe zone (− 5° to 10°).

Conclusion

The tibial tubercle (the Akagi line and Insall line) is found to be a useful and promising anatomic landmark for aligning the tibial component rotation. The TT-TG, with a cutoff value of 9 mm, is helpful to choose the Akagi line or Insall line, alternatively.

A New Reference Axis for Tibial Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new reference axis for tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and verify its reliability. A consecutive series of 80 knees that underwent TKA from 2018 to 2020 as well as 80 healthy knees were analyzed using a three-dimensional tibial model. A coordinate system was established based on the standard TKA tibial cut. The line connecting the lateral-tibial eminence and the medial 1/3rd of the tibial tubercle or the medial border of the tibial tubercle was identified as the lateral eminence line (LE line) and the medial lateral eminence line (MLE line), respectively. To evaluate the reliability of the new reference axis, Akagi's line, the medial third of the tibial tubercle (1/3 line) was compared with the LE and MLE lines by measuring the angle between the lines and the Z-axis. In the coronal view, the intersection angle (TPA), which is composed of the line connecting the center of the medial and lateral tibial plateau with the Z-axis, was measured. The mean angle between Akagi's line and the Z-axis in the healthy group and the osteoarthritis (OA) group was 87.57 ± 3.48° and 87.61 ± 3.47°, respectively. The mean angle between the LE line and Z-axis in the healthy and OA groups was 87.15 ± 4.13° and 86.78 ± 3.95°, respectively. A weak correlation was found between the TPA and Akagi's line and the 1/3 line. A moderate correlation was observed between the TPA and LE lines. There were no significant differences between the healthy and OA groups (P > 0.05) in any of the four reference axes. The LE line showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability and reproducibility. The novel and easily drawn LE line is a preferable option for tibial component rotational alignment in TKA.

Femoral matched tibia component rotation has little effect on the tibial torsion after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Tibiofemoral synchronization technique matches the rotational alignment of the tibial component to the femoral component during the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The rotational axis of the proximal tibia can be changed by this technique, which affects tibial torsion postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tibiofemoral synchronization technique affect the tibial torsion, and the lower limb rotation after primary TKA. It was hypothesised that the tibial torsion would change after primary TKA.

METHODS

Ninety-three posterior stabilised TKAs from 89 patients were included from January 2017 to December 2018. Mechanical hip-knee-ankle axis (mHKA), in plain radiographs, femoral anteversion, tibial torsion, femoral neck-malleolar angle (FNMA), and rotational alignment of the femoral and the tibial components in pre- and postoperative CT scans were measured by two blinded observers. The primary outcome was a postoperative change in femoral anteversion, tibial torsion and FNMA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Knee Society Knee Score (AKSKS)/Function Score (AKSFS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) preoperatively and at 1 year after TKA. Patients' perception of changes in the foot progression angle after TKA was investigated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean rotational mismatch between the femoral and the tibial component was 0.6 ± 3.2°. There was a significant decrease in femoral anteversion (9.5 ± 6.7° vs. 5.2 ± 6.6°, p < 0.001), and a significant increase in the FNMA (17.6 ± 9.7° vs. 21.8 ± 10.5°, p = 0.005) after TKA, while no significant change in tibia torsion was observed (25.4 ± 8.8° vs. 24.9 ± 9.3°, p = 0.739). AKSS (37.8 ± 15.1 vs. 92.8 ± 8.8, p < 0.001), AKSFS (53.9 ± 18.1 vs. 89.9 ± 5.3, p < 0.001), and OKS (18.0 ± 7.3 vs. 39.9 ± 4.8, p < 0.001) were significantly improved at 1 year after TKA. Ten knees (11%) had changes in tibial torsion greater than ± 10° postoperatively. Four of five patients who had changes in FNMA greater than 15° perceived the external rotation of the foot progression angle after TKA. All four patients had an increase in tibial torsion larger than 10°.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the tibiofemoral synchronization technique less likely affects the tibial torsion after primary TKA.

Importance of Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Surgical Transepicondylar Axis in Total Knee Arthroplasty

In total knee arthroplasty, the surgical transepicondylar axis (SEA) is one of the most reliable rotation axes for stabilizing of the patellofemoral joint. The SEA is identified with reference to the lateral epicondyle and the medial sulcus of the medial epicondyle. However, these two structures rarely appear on the same plane on computed tomography (CT), and it is necessary to take two points in separate images. Many surgeons measure the SEA on the same image (pseudo SEA) instead. We aimed to determine the difference between true SEAs and pseudo SEAs. A total of 31 normal knees and 24 varus knees were included in this study. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the femur were reconstructed from CT images, and a reconstructed plane was made using the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate system. Pseudo SEAs drawn in the plane passing through the lateral epicondyle and medial sulcus were defined as l-SEA and m-SEA, respectively. L-SEA, m-SEA, true SEA, and posterior condylar axis (PCA) were projected onto the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate plane and, "p l-SEA," "p m-SEA," "p true SEA," and "p PCA" were obtained. The true SEA angle was defined as the angle between p true SEA and p PCA. The l-SEA angle or m-SEA angle was defined as the angle between the p l-SEA or p m-SEA and p PCA, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between true SEA angle (2.64 ± 2.01 degrees) and pseudo SEA angle (l-SEA angle: 2.74 ± 2.07 degrees, m-SEA: 2.54 ± 2.19 degrees). Conversely, 12 knees in the normal group and 2 knees in the varus group had differences of more than 1 degree (p = 0.01). Among them, 6 knees in the normal group and 0 knees in the varus group had a difference of 2 degrees or more (p = 0.03). In most cases, pseudo SEA can be substituted for true SEA.

Finite element analysis of the tibial component alignment in a transverse plane in total knee arthroplasty

The research aims to analyze the tibial component rotation using the finite element method by resecting the tibia in a transverse plane at an angle between 1.5° (external rotation) and -1.5° (internal rotation). We used a three-dimensional scanner to obtain the tibia's geometrical model of a cadaveric specimen. We then exported the surfaces of the tibial geometrical model through the Computer-Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application (CATIA), which is a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) program. The CAD program three-dimensionally shaped the tibial component, polyethylene, and cement. Our analysis determined that the maximum equivalent stress is obtained in the case of proximal tibial resection at -1.5° angle in a transverse plane (internal rotation) with a value of 12.75 MPa, which is also obtained for the polyethylene (7.693 MPa) and cement (6.6 MPa). The results have shown that detrimental effects begin to occur at -1.5°. We propose the use of this finite element method to simulate the positioning of the tibial component at different tibial resection angles to appreciate the optimal rotation.

The personalized Berger method is usable to solve the problem of tibial rotation

Purpose

The revision of any total knee replacement is carried out in a significant number of cases, due to the excessive internal rotation of the tibial component. The goal was to develop a personalized method, using only the geometric parameters of the tibia, without the femoral guidelines, to calculate the postoperative rotational position of tibial component malrotation within a tolerable error threshold in every case.

Methods

Preoperative CT scans of eighty-five osteoarthritic knees were examined by three independent medical doctors twice over 7 weeks.

The geometric centre of the tibia was produced by the ellipse annotation drawn 8 mm below the tibial plateau, the sagittal and frontal axes of the ellipse were transposed to the slice of the tibial tuberosity. With the usage of several guide lines, a right triangle was drawn within which the personalized Berger angle was calculated.

Results

A very good intra-observer (0.89-0.925) and inter-observer (0.874) intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was achieved. Even if the average of the personalized Berger values were similar to the original 18° (18.32° in our case), only 70.6% of the patients are between the clinically tolerable thresholds (12.2° and 23.8°).

Conclusion

The method, measured on the preoperative CT scans, is capable of calculating the required correction during the planning of revision arthroplasties which are necessary due to the tibial component malrotation. The personalized Berger angle isn’t altered during arthroplasty, this way it determines which one of the anterior reference points of the tibia (medial 1/3 or the tip of the tibial tuberosity, medial border or 1/6 or 1/3 or the centre of the patellar tendon) can be used during the positioning of the tibial component.

Level of evidence

Level II, Diagnostic Study (Methodological Study).

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves the outlier of rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis using 3DCT measurements

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of prosthetic alignment with three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a robotic-assisted surgical technique versus a conventional TKA.

METHODS

41 TKAs were performed with a handheld robotic-assisted surgical procedure (Robot group) between 2019 and 2020. Another 41 patients underwent TKA with a conventional manual surgical procedure (Manual group) using the same prosthesis. The operation durations between both groups were investigated. 3DCT scans of the entire lower extremities were taken before and after the surgery and femoral and tibial alignments in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were measured using computer software. The differences in prosthetic alignment and translation between the preoperative 3DCT plan and postoperative 3DCT image were also measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the post-operative outliers of the femorotibial angle between the groups. In the tibial-axial plane, the mean of prosthetic alignment in the anteroposterior plane was 4.0° in the Robot group and 6.7° in the Manual group (p < 0.01). The rate of outliers for tibial-axial alignment in the Robot group was significantly less than in the Manual group (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in prosthetic translation in the proximal-distal, anterior-posterior and medial-lateral orientations between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a radiologic study using 3DCT, robotic-assisted TKA reduced the outliers for rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis in comparison to conventional TKA, which can lead to improved tracking of the femoral-tibial bearing surfaces.

Efficacy Analysis of Selection of Distal Reference Point for Tibial Coronal Plane Osteotomy during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review

Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. The tibial platform osteotomy must take full account of the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the rotational alignment of the tibial prosthesis. During surgery, individual differences in the coronal alignment of the tibia need to be taken into account as poor alignment after surgery can lead to rapid wear of the tibial platform, reducing the longevity of the prosthesis and adversely affecting quality of life. Intraoperative tibial osteotomies are often performed using extramedullary alignment. When an extramedullary alignment approach is used, the proximal tibial osteotomy guide is usually placed in the medial third of the tibial tuberosity. There is no consensus on the most reliable anatomical landmarks or axes for achieving distal tibial coronary alignment. Anatomical points or reference axes that are highly reproducible and precise need to be identified. From available data it appears that most surgeons use the extensor hallucis longus tendon, the second metatarsal, and the anterior tibial cortex to determine the distal localization point. However, its accuracy has not been confirmed in clinical and radiographic data, and the alignment concept and preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty has paid more attention to rotational alignment, but there are few studies on the coronal alignment of the tibia. This article reviews the recent use of the distal tibial coronal osteotomy reference point in total knee arthroplasty. However, due to there being only a small number of studies available, the evidence collected is insufficient to prove that a certain reference axis has obvious advantages and a combination of different reference points is needed to achieve the ideal lower extremity force line angle.

Considerable inter-individual variability of tibial geometric ratios renders bone-implant mismatch unavoidable using off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the variability in tibial geometric ratios among knees of different sexes and races to determine whether commercially-available tibial baseplates accommodate the morphologic diversity. The hypothesis was that anthropometric studies report considerable variability of tibial geometric ratios among sexes and races.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two authors independently conducted an electronic search using MEDLINE^® and Embase^® on 28 January 2021 for clinical studies reporting on tibial geometric ratios. Tibial geometric ratios, as reported by the clinical studies, were represented by plotting their means and two standard deviations for comparison to two symmetric and two asymmetric commercially-available tibial baseplates.

RESULTS

A total of 27 articles that reported on a combined total of 20,944 knees were eligible for data extraction. Variation in tibial aspect ratios was equal among sexes. The greatest variation in aspect ratio was observed among East Asians, followed by Caucasians, African-Americans, Indian and Middle Easterns. The variation in tibial asymmetry ratio was larger among men compared to women. The greatest variation in asymmetry ratio was observed among African-Americans, followed by Caucasians, East Asians, Indian and Middle Easterns. Bone-implant mismatch of > 3 mm overhang or > 4 mm under-coverage with four commercially-available tibial baseplates occurred in large proportions of knees due to variations in aspect ratio (in 17-100% of knees) and asymmetry ratio (in 7-100% of knees).

CONCLUSION

Anthropometric studies reported considerable inter-individual variability of tibial geometric ratios, which exceeded effects of sexual dimorphism and racial diversity. Bone-implant mismatch may be unavoidable in a large proportion of knees, when considering that a surgeon generally only uses one or a few TKA brands. These findings support the drive towards patient-specific implants to potentially achieve accurate bone-implant fit by implant customisation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of implant positioning evaluation on a CT-based three-dimensional postoperative matching system for total knee arthroplasty

Background

The evaluation of postoperative total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment mainly relies on measurement data obtained from plain radiographs. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to document the intra- and inter-observer reliability in assessment of TKA component positioning after surgery using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) image matching system.

Methods

Fourteen knees from 14 patients who received primary TKA were included, and images were analyzed by blinded readers not associated with the surgeries. The examiner digitized the reference points according to defined landmarks, and the designated size component was superimposed to the 3D reconstructed CT model for measurement. In addition to the evaluation of implant position against the coronal and sagittal lower limb mechanical axes that were defined based on bony landmarks, implant position against axes connecting implant-based reference points that are easier to indicate was evaluated.

Results

The overall intra- and inter-observer reliabilities determined by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the implant alignment measurement for both femoral and tibial components were good (ICC > 0.60), except in the direction of femoral flexion and extension, for both mechanical and implant-based axes. The difference between implant alignment measurements according to the traditional mechanical axis and the implant-based axis ranged between means of 0.08^o and 1.70^o and were statistically significantly different.

Conclusions

The postoperative evaluation of implant position in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D-CT image matching is reliable and has good reproducibility except for the sagittal alignment assessment of the femoral component. The measured implant position according to the traditional mechanical axis and the implant-based axis were slightly but significantly different.

A new technique for determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effectiveness of our new technique "Range of motion-anatomical (ROM-A) technique" which is the combination of the self-positioning technique "Range of motion (ROM) technique" and the anatomical landmarks technique in determining the tibial component (TC) rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 103 knees who underwent TKA. The ROM-A technique was consisted of two steps. First, the TC was set and marked by the ROM technique in knee extension. Second, the TC was set according to the marking in the knee flexion and the component rotational angle relative to the anatomical tibial anteroposterior (AP) axis was adjusted between 0° and 10° external rotation using the navigation system. The rotational angle of TC relative to the anatomical AP axis was measured using postoperative computed tomography. Moreover, the hypothetical rotational angle of the TC in the ROM technique was calculated only from the intraoperative difference between the two techniques.

RESULTS

The actual rotational angle by the ROM-A technique was externally rotated 3.0°, and the rotational outlier occurred in 3.0%. A significant difference in outlier rate was observed between the two techniques (p = 0.03). The hypothetical rotational angle of TC determined by the ROM technique (the first step only in the ROM-A technique) was externally rotated 4.6° and the TC rotational outlier (difference to AP axis: >10°) occurred in 11.7%.

CONCLUSION

Using the ROM-A technique, the TC was finally fixed in almost all targeted rotational positions, and this technique could reduce the anatomical rotational outlier compared with the ROM technique.

Preoperative tibiofemoral rotational alignment is a risk factor for component rotational mismatch in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial components is reported to be a risk factor for unsuccessful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the rotational mismatch can still occur even when each component is aligned within the desired angle. Therefore, there may be other unknown factors. This study aims to investigate a risk factor for component rotational mismatch in TKA. The authors hypothesized a significant correlation between the rotational mismatch angle and not only the rotational alignments of components, but also the preoperative tibiofemoral rotation angle.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included 79 knees who underwent TKA. Computed tomography images were obtained preoperatively and 2 weeks after surgery for the component positional measurement. The postoperative component rotational mismatch angle between the tibial and femoral components and the rotational alignment of each tibial and femoral component to anatomical axes was evaluated. In addition, the preoperative rotational angle between the tibia and femur bones and patients' demographics were also investigated. The correlation between the postoperative component rotational mismatch angle and perioperative variables was analyzed to identify risk factors for component rotational mismatch.

RESULTS

The mean component rotational mismatch angle was 1.8° of internal rotation of the tibial component relative to the femoral component, and the angle ranged from 11.3° of internal rotation to 7.3° of external rotation of the tibial component. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the preoperative rotational alignment between the tibia and femur and the rotational alignment of each component were influential factors in the postoperative component rotational mismatch angle.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative tibiofemoral rotational alignment and the rotational alignment of each tibial and femoral component and are risk factors for the postoperative component rotational mismatch in TKA.

The use of an asymmetrical tibial tray in TKA optimises tibial rotation when fitted to the posterior tibial plateau border

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of positioning an asymmetrical tibial tray relative to the posterior tibial edge and to analyse the relationship between the posterior fit and tibial rotation after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesised that an asymmetrical tray would adjust to the posterior border of the tibial plateau with proper tibial rotation.

METHODS

Ninety-three consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using a Persona fixed-bearing system (63 varus deformities and 30 valgus deformities) and a 3-month follow-up CT scan. An independent examiner measured different variables: the femoral angle between the clinical epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar line of the femoral component, the tibial angle between the posterior borders of the tibial tray and the tibial plateau, and the tibial rotation with respect to the femoral component. These measurements were also compared between varus and valgus subgroups.

RESULTS

For the varus and valgus subgroups, the mean postoperative femoral angle was 2.1º ± 1.2º and 2.5º ± 1.0º, respectively (n.s.). The mean posterior fitting angle of the tibial tray was 0.1º ± 2.4º and 1.4º ± 3.2º for the varus and valgus subgroups, respectively, with a significant difference between groups (p = 0.03). The tibial rotations with respect to the femoral component for the varus and valgus groups were 0.9º ± 3.3º and 2.2º ± 3.1º of external rotation, respectively (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that fitting an asymmetrical tibial tray to the posterior border of the tibial plateau could optimise tibial rotation. The posterior border was considered to be a reliable and easily identifiable landmark for proper tibial rotation and coverage during a primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patellar facet ratio affects knee pain, stair climbing and stair descent after TKA without patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

To determine whether knee pain or functional impairment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing are correlated with preoperative patellar morphology or postoperative patellar orientation. The hypotheses were that patellar shape, increased tilt and lateral displacement would be associated with pain and functional impairment.

METHODS

From a consecutive series of 152 knees that received a cemented postero-stabilized TKA, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were collected at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Uni- and multi-variable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the collected clinical scores and patient demographics and patellar morphology, measured from pre- and post-operative frontal, lateral and skyline view radiographs.

RESULTS

The OKS was 75 ± 23, whereas the KOOS pain, stair climbing, and descent were respectively 77 ± 24, 3.9 ± 1.1 and 3.8 ± 1.2. OKS was not associated with any radiographic outcomes, whereas KOOS pain was better for knees with larger medial patellar facets. The KOOS stair climbing and descent were also better for knees with larger medial patellar facets.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study partly confirm the hypotheses that pain and functional impairments after TKA without patellar resurfacing are associated with patellar shape. No association was revealed between postoperative patellar orientation and function nor pain. Quantitative consideration of patellar congruency could therefore prevent pain and improve function after TKA without patellar resurfacing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level III.

Proximal tibial morphology and risk of posterior tibial cortex impingement in patients with AA-sized Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty tibial implants

Background

In cases of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), an increase in anteroposterior and medial-lateral length is usually disproportional when comparing AA and A-sized tibial components. Asynchronous increments may cause tibial keel impingement leading to complications.

Methods

Radiographic measurements were performed in five patients with AA-sized tibial implants. The posterior cortex of proximal tibia had two angles recorded as ∠ M1 and ∠ M2. The minimum distance between the tibial component keel and outer margin of the posterior tibial cortex (mDKC) was measured, and the correlation between the preoperative posterior slope angle (PSA), ∠ M1, and mDKC was analyzed.

Results

All patients showed an acceptable component positioning. Only one patient had an mDKC of < 4 mm that fulfilled the criteria for the posterior tibial cortex at risk. The patient had an increased PSA and ∠ M1 compared to other patients. A negative correlation was found between preoperative PSA and mDKC (r = − 0.935, p = 0.0193); and ∠ M1 and mDKC (r = − 0.969, p = 0.0032). However, no stem tip pain, periprosthetic fracture, or component loosening were observed.

Conclusions

The distance between the tibial keel and posterior tibial cortex was reduced in AA-sized patients with a large PSA and ∠M1; therefore, the risk of the tibial cortex injury should be considered.

Assessing knee anatomy using Makoplasty software a case series of 99 knees

Background

Role of MAKOplasty software in determining femoral neck version, distal-femoral resection angle, tibial axis difference, distal-femoral rotation, medial/lateral tibial slope, and tibial tubercle alignment has yet to be fully explored.

Methods

Preoperative CT scans and plain films of 99 patients were obtained for each patient according to predetermined MAKO-protocol by four observers. Reliability analyses (Cronbach's Alpha-test) was performed to determine agreement between raters for angle measures.

Results

Anatomic measurements were similar to previously published literature, and cronbachs'alpha analysis demonstrated agreement amidst all observers.

Conclusion

MAKOplasty software produces similar results to anatomic measurements in planning for TKA with good reproducibility.

Three-point Method to Guide the Tibial Resection and Component Placing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective

To introduce a three‐point method combining the midpoint of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to determine appropriate tibial resection and component placing during TKA and to compare this method with Insall's 1/3 method.

Methods

A consecutive series of 128 knees that underwent TKA from January 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed. In one group (64 knees), the medial 1/3 of tibial tubercle (the Insall's traditional method) was used for tibial component alignment. In the other group (64 knees), the three‐point line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midpoint of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL was used for tibial component alignment. Both groups used the anterior tibial tendon as the distal reference for tibial resection. The coronal alignment error of the tibial component was determined by the angle between the line parallel to the tibial component platform and the tibial mechanical axis measured on postoperative radiograph. The axial rotation error of the femoral or tibial component was the intersection angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and a line tangent to the posterior edge of the femoral or tibial component measured on CT. The coronal and axial alignment errors were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average coronal alignment error of the tibial component in the three‐point method group was 0.2° ± 1.4° versus − 0.9° ± 1.8°in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 37.3% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the femoral component was 0.2° ± 1.2° in the three‐point method group versus − 1.1° ± 1.7° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in three‐point method group decreased by 43.9% compared to Insall's traditional method group. The average axial rotation error of the tibial component was 0.4° ± 1.4° versus − 1.4° ± 1.8° in the Insall's 1/3 method group (P < 0.001), and the mean absolute value in the three‐point method group reduced by 35.5% compared to the Insall's traditional method group. The rates of rotation outliers were significantly lower in the three‐point method group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The line connecting the midpoint of the PCL, the midsulcus of the tibial spines, and the midpoint of the ACL could be used as the reference for the tibial resection and component placing. This method appears to be more accurate than Insall's 1/3 method. The results of this study provide a candidate method for component orientation with little error.

[Adjusted mechanical alignment: operative technique-Tips and tricks]

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical alignment (MA) is a standardized procedure that aims to achieve a neutrally aligned leg axis. An alignment of the prosthesis closer to the patient's anatomy can be an approach for better clinical outcomes. The surgical technique of adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) presented here is a modified extension-gap-first technique that takes into account the natural ligamentous tension of the knee joint so that ligamentous releases can be avoided as far as possible.

INDICATION

The aMA technique can be used for primary and secondary varus gonarthrosis of up to 20° of varus.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The aim of the operation is to achieve a balanced ligament tension through a femoral osseous correction rather than ligament releases. TEA and the sulcus line are marked to control the ligament-based femoral rotation. The osteophytes are removed to ensure a reliable ligament tension. A quantitative ligament tensioner is stretched with great care, and gap width as well as medial and lateral ligament tension are read off. In order to correct an extension gap asymmetry, instead of the typical medial soft tissue release, the asymmetry is compensated by a special femoral cutting block. Now, the flexion gap is assessed, whereby the transverse femoral rotation follows the soft tissue tension. The tensioner adjusts a rectangular flexion gap with balanced ligament tension. After a final balancing of the gaps, the femoral preparation is completed and the trial components are inserted. Here, the rotation of the tibial component is set by repeated flexion-extension cycles.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The technique presented combines a measured-resection technique with individual ligament tension. The maximum deviation of the femoral alignment in the coronal plane from the neutral alignment is 2.5°. In order to avoid problems, it is recommended, as with the described technique, to achieve a component alignment based on the patient anatomy by adjusting the femoral component. The measured-resection technique carries the risk of flexion instability. With the gap-balancing technique symmetrical ligament tension can be achieved, assuming precise proximal tibial cuts. When aligning the femoral component rotation, flexion gap stability and patella tracking should be considered. Long-term studies of high case numbers are necessary to evaluate the good short-term results of the presented surgical technique.

Wiberg Type III patellae and J-sign during extension compromise outcomes of total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Understanding the risk factors associated with postoperative pain and worse outcome can guide surgeons on whether primary patellar resurfacing is warranted during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinical scores and pain after TKA without patellar resurfacing are correlated with patellar shape and postoperative patellar position and kinematics.

METHODS

Radiographs as well as anterior knee pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (pVAS) were collected pre- and postoperatively for 100 knees aged 68 ± 7.7 years that received uncemented TKA without patellar resurfacing. At a minimum follow-up of 12 months the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) as well as the flexion range of motion and the presence of J-sign during active extension were recorded. Uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the collected clinical scores and patient demographic and radiographic data.

RESULTS

Postoperative OKS (79 ± 14.4) was worse for Wiberg Type III patellae (β = -11.4, P = .020, compared with Type II). Anterior pVAS (2 ± 2) was greater in knees with J-sign during extension (β = 2.8, P < .001). None of the other radiographic measurements (patellar tilt, congruence angle and lateral patellar displacement) were correlated with postoperative OKS or anterior pVAS.

CONCLUSION

Incongruent patellar shape (Wiberg Type III) is associated with worse clinical scores, and abnormal kinematics (J-sign) with increased pain after TKA without patellar resurfacing. The authors therefore recommend routine resurfacing for Wiberg Type III patellae, though further studies are required to confirm whether resurfacing truly improves clinical scores and pain in this subgroup.

Alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty is a well-documented phenomenon. Although many factors have been implicated, including modifiable and nonmodifiable patient factors, emphasis over the past decade has been on implant alignment and stability as both a cause of, and a solution to, this problem. Several alignment targets have evolved with a proliferation of techniques following the introduction of computer and robotic-assisted surgery. Mechanical alignment targets may achieve mechanically-sound alignment while ignoring the soft tissue envelope; kinematic alignment respects the soft tissue envelope while ignoring the mechanical environment. Functional alignment is proposed as a hybrid technique to allow mechanically-sound, soft tissue-friendly alignment targets to be identified and achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):276-279.

Improved mediolateral load distribution without adverse laxity pattern in robot-assisted knee arthroplasty compared to a standard manual measured resection technique

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains in its infancy, is expensive but offers the promise of improved kinematic performance through precise bone cuts, with minimal soft tissue disruption, based on pre-resection soft tissue behaviour. This cadaveric study examined load transfer, soft tissue performance and radiographic indices for conventional (sTKA) versus rTKA. The null hypothesis was there would be no difference between the two modes of implantation.

METHODS

Whole (ten) cadaveric limbs were randomised to receive either robotic (rTKA, N = 5) or conventional measured resection (sTKA, N = 5) knee arthroplasty. Laxity patterns were established using validated fixed sensors (Verasense) with manual maximum displacement for six degrees of freedom. Tibiofemoral load and contact points were determined dynamically using remote sensor technology for medial and lateral compartments through a functional arc of motion (0-110 degrees of motion). Final component position was assessed using pre- and post-implantation CT.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences for laxity were found (n.s.). The rTKA group exhibited consistently balanced mediolateral load throughout the full arc with significantly reduced overall total load across the joint (for distinct points of measurement, p < 0.05). Despite using flexion-extension and mediolateral gap balancing with measured resection, the sTKA group failed to achieve balance in at least three points of the flexion arc. Post-operative CT confirmed satisfactory component alignment with no significant differences for positioning between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This work found improved load sharing for rTKA when compared to conventional surgery for same donor knees. Laxity and CT determined final component positioning was not significantly different. The work supports the contention that robot-assisted TKA delivers improved tibiofemoral load sharing in time zero studies under defined conditions but such offers the promise of improved clinical performance and reduced implant wear.

Enhanced patella tracking in rotating platform total knee replacements, friend or foe? A case of iliotibial band impingement by rotating polyethylene insert

Rotating platform total knee replacement implants have been marketed to allow more precise approximation of normal knee kinematics and enhance patella tracking. At liberty of rotation, the distinct mobile polyethylene insert design does have its pitfalls in spite of purported merits. We report a case of lateral knee pain following rotating platform total knee replacement, attributable to iliotibial band impingement by the rotating polyethylene insert. Prompt treatment via arthroscopic release circumvented a traumatic and costly revision procedure.

Methods of intra- and post-operative determination of the position of the tibial component during total knee replacement

AIM OF THE STUDY

To identify the most reliable anatomical landmarks and imaging techniques for assessing the rotation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

An extensive literature review (from January 2016 to March 2019) was performed. We included studies about primary TKA with details concerning the anatomical landmarks used for implanting the tibial component and also imaging studies assessing tibial component rotation. The final selection comprises only thirty-five articles consistent with the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Extra-articular landmarks are not always reliable (even though the tibial tubercle is one of the most popular extra-articular landmarks used to assess the rotation of the tibial component), mainly because they vary and can lead to malrotation of the tibial component. Akagi's line (an intra-articular landmark) is considered to be the most reliable and easy to find during surgery and likewise is not affected by articular deformities. The anterior tibial cortex (intra-articular landmark) also proved to be accurate and reliable with the main advantage being that is palpable after tibial resection. Radiography provides a good and inexpensive option for imaging, but it is insufficient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used in some cases but not routinely for assessing TKA components or their orientation. Computed tomography (CT), used together with a well-defined protocol (Berger's method being the preferred choice), remains the "gold standard" for evaluating the rotation of the tibial component after TKA.

CONCLUSION

Currently, the most accurate and reliable anatomical landmarks are represented by Akagi's line and the anterior cortex of the tibia. Post-operatively, through CT and well-established protocols, the rotation of the tibial component can be accurately determined.

Intraoperative Tibial Anteroposterior Axis Could Not Be Replicated After Tibial Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effect of the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the proximal tibia defined at the cutting surface using an image-free navigation system in total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This prospective study included 68 patients (79 knees) who underwent total knee arthroplasty. The tibial AP axis was registered in the navigation system with reference to Akagi's line, connecting the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament to the medial border of the patellar tendon attachment at the tibial joint surface. After proximal tibial osteotomy, the AP axis was replicated as the AP(O) axis. We measured the difference between the AP axis defined at the joint surface and the AP(O) axis defined at the osteotomy surface.

RESULTS

The AP(O) axis at the osteotomy surface internally rotated 2.0° to the AP axis at the joint surface, and the AP(O) axis outlier (difference to AP axis: >3°) occurred in 54% (43 knees). In the >3° malrotation group, internal malrotation occurred in 37% (30 knees) and external malrotation occurred in 17% (13 knees). In the outlier analysis, the left knees were significantly found in the internal outlier group.

CONCLUSION

The tibial AP axis, connecting the middle of the posterior cruciate ligament to the medial border of the patellar tendon attachment defined at the tibial joint surface, could not be replicated at the tibial osteotomy surface. If the tibial components were set depending only on the AP axis defined at the osteotomy surface, the tibial components could internally rotate and have more outliers, especially in the left knees.

A proposed new rotating reference axis for the tibial component after proximal tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

During total knee arthroplasty, few rotating reference axes can be reliably used after tibial resection. We speculated that a line that passes through the lateral edge of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) at its tibial attachment after resection and the most prominent point of the tibial tubercle [after-tibial resection (ATR) line] will provide a good reference axis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between ATR and Akagi’s lines.

Materials and methods

In this case–control simulation study, we retrospectively evaluated 38 patients with varus knee and 28 patients with valgus knee. We defined the reference cutting plane as 10 mm distal from the lateral articular surface of the tibia in varus group and as 7 mm distal from the medial articular surface in the valgus group. We measured angles between Akagi’s line and the ATR line (ATR line angle) as well as between Akagi’s line and 1/3 Akagi’s line (1/3 Akagi’s line angle), which passes through the midpoint of PCL and the medial third of the patellar tendon. We used paired t-tests to determine the significance of differences between these angles, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Intra- and interclass correlation coefficients for the reproducibility of 1/3 Akagi’s line angle and ATR line angle were analyzed by two surgeons.

Results

We found that 1/3 Akagi’s line angle was 10.2° ± 1.3° in the varus group and 10.9° ± 1.3° in the valgus group (p = 0.017). The ATR line was positioned externally compared with Akagi’s line in all patients. Mean ATR line angles at 0°, 3° and 7° posterior slopes were 6.1° ± 1.9°, 5.8° ± 2.0° and 6.0° ± 1.7° in the varus group and 6.3° ± 2.3°, 6.2° ± 2.3° and 5.4° ± 2.1° in the valgus group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ATR line angle between the varus and valgus groups. (p = 0.34–0.67) Intra- and interclass correlation coefficients for the reproducibility of 1/3 Akagi’s line angle were 0.936 and 0.986 and those for the reproducibility of ATR line angle were 0.811 and 0.839.

Conclusions

The ATR line was positioned between Akagi’s line and 1/3 Akagi’s line in all patients and was a valid option for evaluating rotational tibial alignment after tibial resection.