Transtibial fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tear reduces posterior extrusion and physiological translation of the medial meniscus in middle-aged and elderly patients

Modified Mason-Allen vs Two Simple Stitch Fixation for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various suture configurations are available for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair. The modified Mason-Allen (MMA) technique has been proposed as a refixation technique for MMPRT instead of the conventional 2 simple stitches (TSS). This is in view of its superior biomechanical characteristics.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare MMA and TSS configuration techniques for MMPRT repair and identify any differences between the 2 techniques in terms of clinical outcomes, medial meniscal extrusion (MME), and postoperative healing.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: ("meniscus" OR "meniscal injuries") AND ("Mason-Allen" OR "simple stitch" OR "suture techniques"). Data pertaining to all patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, MME, postoperative healing, cartilage degeneration, and progression of knee osteoarthritis were extracted from each study. The pooled outcome data were analyzed using random- and fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

After abstract and full-text screening, 6 clinical studies were included. In total, there were 291 patients; 160 underwent MMA fixation, and 131 underwent the TSS technique. The majority of studies had similar surgical techniques regarding repair technique, suture material, tibial fixation, and number and position of tibial tunnels. There were no differences between the groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures at 14.2 months. Both techniques were also similar in the degree of postoperative MME and meniscal healing.

CONCLUSION

Both suture configurations were equivalent in terms of clinical outcomes, the extent of meniscal extrusion, and postoperative healing. The TSS technique may offer advantages in terms of faster learning curve and shorter operative time. However, randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes, longer follow-up and assessment of chondral degeneration, and presence of knee osteoarthritis are required to assess whether a true difference exists, as the majority of included studies were limited by their retrospective design.

Longitudinal changes in medial meniscus extrusion and clinical outcomes following pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears: a 3-year evaluation

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal changes in medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores at multiple time points up to 3 years after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs).

METHODS

This retrospective case series study included 64 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and four MRI evaluations (preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively). MME was measured during the same time points. Clinical scores were assessed four times: preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. Additionally, a multivariate analysis was performed on the change in MME (ΔMME) from the preoperative measurement point to 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The ΔMME per month from the preoperative measurement point to 3 months postoperatively, from 3 months to 1 year postoperatively, and from 1 to 3 years postoperatively were 0.30, 0.05, and 0.01 mm/month, respectively. All clinical scores significantly improved 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.001). In a multiple regression analysis for ΔMME from the preoperative measurement point to 3 years postoperatively, sex significantly affected the outcome (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Following pullout repair for MMPRTs with well-aligned lower extremities, although MME progression could not be entirely prevented, the rate of progression decreased over time, and clinical scores improved. In particular, MME progressed markedly during the first 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, sex had a significant influence on MME progression, suggesting that males may be able to expand the indications of pullout repair for MMPRTs.

Longitudinal changes in medial knee joint space narrowing after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Despite good clinical results, repair of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs) may not completely prevent knee osteoarthritis progression. This study evaluated changes in the medial joint space (MJS) during the first and second years after repair, compared to narrowing in the contralateral knee, using fixed-flexion view (FFV) radiographs.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients who underwent pull-out repair for a unilateral MMPRT were included. FFV radiographs were obtained pre-operatively and at the 1- and 2-year post-repair timepoints to evaluate changes in the MJS and Kellgren-Lawrence grade bilaterally. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The change in the MJS was greater in MMPRT knees than in contralateral knees during the first year (0.48 ± 0.80 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.49 mm, p < 0.001), but this difference lessened in the second year (0.09 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.07 ± 0.38 mm, p = 0.285). Kellgren-Lawrence grade progression in MMPRT knees was less in the second year. Clinical outcomes significantly improved at both 1 and 2 years post-repair than the pre-operative values (p < 0.001), with continued improvement in clinical outcomes in the second year. There was no significant correlation between patient characteristics and the change in the MJS from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Pull-out repair for MMPRTs did not completely prevent MJS narrowing, but the rate of narrowing decreased in the second year (mean, 0.09 mm) compared to that in the first year (mean, 0.48 mm). MJS narrowing in the second year after MM posterior root repair was comparable to that of the contralateral knee. Clinical outcomes further improved over the second year after repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Root Repair Has Superior Radiological and Clinical Outcomes Than Partial Meniscectomy and Nonoperative Treatment in the Management of Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compile and analyze structural and clinical outcomes after meniscus root tear treatment as currently described in the literature.

METHODS

A review was conducted to identify studies published since 2011 on efficacy of repair, meniscectomy, and nonoperative management in the treatment of meniscus root tears. Patient cohorts were grouped into treatment categories, with medial and lateral root tears analyzed separately; data were collected on patient demographics, structural outcomes including joint space width, degree of medial meniscal extrusion, progression to total knee arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria. Heterogeneity was measured using the I-statistic, and outcomes were summarized using forest plots without pooled means.

RESULTS

The 56 included studies comprised a total of 3,191 patients. Mean age among the included studies ranged from 24.6 to 65.6 years, whereas mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 125.9 months. Heterogeneity analysis identified significant differences between studies. Change in joint space width ranged from -2.4 to -0.6 mm (i.e., decreased space) after meniscectomy (n = 186) and -0.9 to -0.1 mm after root repair (n = 209); change in medial meniscal extrusion ranged from -0.6 to 6.5 mm after root repair (n = 521) and 0.2 to 4.2 mm after meniscectomy (n = 66); and event rate for total knee arthroplasty ranged from 0.00 to 0.22 after root repair (n = 205), 0.35 to 0.60 after meniscectomy (n = 53), and 0.27 to 0.35 after nonoperative treatment (n = 93). Root repair produced the greatest numerical increase in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores of the 3 treatment arms. In addition, root repair improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (range: 22-32), Sports and Recreational Activities (range: 23-36), Quality of Life (range: 22-42), and Symptoms subscales (range: 10-19), in studies with low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature reporting on the treatment of meniscus root tears is heterogenous and largely limited to Level III and IV studies. Current evidence suggests root repair may be the most effective treatment strategy in lessening joint space narrowing of the knee and producing improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Augmentation of a Nonanatomical Repair of a Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Centralization Using Three Knotless Anchors May Be Associated With Less Meniscal Extrusion and Better Compressive Load Distribution in Mid-Flexion Compared With Non-Anatomical Root Repair Alone in a Porcine Knee Model

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanics of the centralization augmentation using knotless soft anchors to a nonanatomical transtibial pull-out root repair in a porcine medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) model.

METHODS

Porcine knee joints (N = 10) were used to perform one of the following procedures: (1) intact; (2) MMPRT; (3) nonanatomical root repair; (4) nonanatomical root repair with centralization using 2 anchors: anchors were inserted at the posterior medial collateral ligament (MCL) border and 10 mm anterior to the posterior MCL border; and (5) nonanatomical root repair with centralization using 3 anchors: another anchor was placed 10 mm posterior to the posterior MCL border. Contact area on the medial meniscus (MM), contact pressure in the MM and tibial cartilage, and MM extrusion were evaluated at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° knee flexions under 200 N compressive force.

RESULTS

MM extrusion at the posterior MCL border was significantly reduced after root repair with centralization using 3 anchors than after root repair alone at 30° (-0.063 mm vs 1.5 mm, P = .017), 45° (0.21 mm vs 1.7 mm, P = .018), and 60° (0.78 mm vs 2.3 mm, P = .019). There were no significant differences in MM extrusion between the root repair alone and root repair with centralization using 2 anchors at all flexion angles. The contact area in the middle and posterior MM was significantly greater after centralization with 3 anchors than after root repair alone at all flexion angles (except the posterior MM at 90°). The mean contact pressure in the tibial cartilage was significantly lower after centralization with 3 anchors than after root repair at all angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of a nonanatomical repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear with centralization using three knotless anchors may be associated with less meniscal extrusion and better compressive load distribution between 30° and 60° flexion compared with nonanatomical root repair alone in a porcine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biomechanical study at time zero suggests that the addition of centralization using 3 knotless anchors may reduce MM extrusion and restore the load-distributing function of the MM.

Insufficient restoration of meniscal extrusion by transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears

PURPOSE

The long-term changes in the dynamics of the medial meniscus after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are not completely understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of transtibial pullout repair on MMPRTs and whether the effects would be sustained.

METHODS

Nineteen knees with MMPRTs that were treated by trans-tibial pullout repair were enrolled in this study. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured by ultrasonography during knee extension (no weight-bearing with the knee at 0° extension: NW0°) and 90° flexion (no weight-bearing with the knee at 90° flexion: NW90°) with the patient in the supine position and with full weight-bearing (FW0°) preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score.

RESULTS

The difference in MME with NW0° was not statistically significant between the preoperative (3.4 ± 1.0 mm) and 12-month postoperative (3.7 ± 0.6 mm) time points. The MME with NW90° at 3 (2.1 ± 0.7 mm) and 12 months (2.9 ± 0.6 mm) postoperatively were significantly lower than the preoperative values (3.4 ± 0.8 mm) (P < 0.05). However, the value significantly increased from 3 to 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The MME with FW0° at 12 months postoperatively (4.3 ± 0.6 mm) was significantly larger than that at pre-operatively (3.6 ± 0.9 mm) (P < 0.05). All the patients' clinical conditions were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively when compared to their preoperative clinical conditions.

CONCLUSION

Surgery did not reduce the extrusion in the no weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions at knee extension, and these values increased in the postoperative period. In addition, while the surgery reduced the extrusion in the knee flexion position, the restoration achieved by the surgery was not sustained in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Concomitant posterior anchoring further reduces posterior meniscal extrusion during pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Transtibial pullout repair improves the clinical outcomes of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRTs); however, reducing MM extrusion remains challenging. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the role of additional posterior anchoring (PA) during pullout repair in reducing the severity of MM extrusion compared to pullout repair alone.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pullout repair with two-cinch stitches (TCS) only or TCS combined with PA (TCS-PA)-deployment of an additional suture anchor in the posteromedial corner of MM-were included retrospectively. MM medial and posterior extrusion (MMME and MMPE), MM extrusion and remaining volume (MMEV and MMRV), and corresponding ratios were evaluated pre-operatively and three months post-operatively using a three-dimensional meniscal model at 10° and 90° of knee flexion and compared within and between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 15 and 16 patients treated with TCS and TCS-PA, respectively, were enrolled. At 90° knee flexion, both techniques significantly reduced MMPE (TCS: 4.2 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.05; TCS-PA: 3.7 ± 0.8 mm to 2.8 ± 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) at three months post-operatively. TCS-PA reduced MMPE more significantly than TCS alone (p < 0.05). Only TCS-PA significantly improved the MMEV and MMRV ratios (39.6 ± 8.9% to 28.1 ± 6.0%, p < 0.05 and 60.4 ± 8.9% to 71.9 ± 6.0%, p < 0.05, respectively). Significance was not found in all other comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques improved MMPE at knee flexion at the three month follow-up, with TCS-PA providing significantly superior results. Our findings support the evidence that the application of PA may be an effective surgical option for alleviating persistent MMPE.

Meniscal Extrusion Measurements After Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Meniscal extrusion has become increasingly utilized when evaluating meniscus root abnormalities. However, no consensus definition or approach exists on how to measure extrusion.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of heterogeneity in meniscal extrusion measurement techniques and reported extrusion values in knees with posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs). We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion measurement techniques would vary considerably throughout reported studies, with resultant wide-ranging published extrusion values.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The inclusion criteria consisted of all clinical and cadaveric studies reporting on meniscal extrusion after PMMRTs, excluding studies lacking data in full extension, those presenting only semiquantitative analyses, articles reporting only differences in meniscal extrusion, and review articles.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were included. Imaging modality types included magnetic resonance imaging (89%), 3-dimensional reconstruction with computed tomography (7%), linear displacement transducers (2%), and a combination of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (2%). The 3 most commonly used landmarks to acquire coronal images for meniscal extrusion measurements were the medial collateral ligament (38%), the midpoint of the anterior-posterior length of the medial meniscus (23%), and the middle of the medial femoral condyle (19%). The pooled mean extrusion values according to the measurement location were 3.5 ± 0.7 mm, 3.9 ± 0.8 mm, and 4.5 ± 2.1 mm, respectively, with no significant differences noted between the modality types (P = .23). The pooled mean meniscal extrusion from all included studies was 3.2 ± 2.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation exists in measurement techniques for meniscal extrusion, particularly as it relates to the coronal cross-sectional reference location. Further studies should aim to provide clear descriptions of the measurement method and have uniform measurement methodology to allow comparisons and pooling between studies.

The stability of repaired meniscal root can affect postoperative cartilage status following medial meniscus posterior root repair

BACKGROUND

Transtibial pullout repair yields beneficial clinical outcomes in patients with medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear. However, the relationship between repaired meniscal root healing status and postoperative clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate changes in articular cartilage damage and clinical scores after pullout repair using two simple stitches (TSS).

METHODS

Thirty-three patients who underwent pullout repair using TSS were assessed. Healing status was assessed by a semi-quantitative second-look arthroscopic scoring system comprising three evaluation criteria (width of bridging tissues, stability of the repaired root, and synovial coverage), 1 year postoperatively. MM medial extrusion (MMME) and cartilage damage were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The medial compartment was divided into 8 zones (A-H) for comparison of preoperative and 1-year postoperative cartilage damage. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and visual analogue scale pain score.

RESULTS

Although cartilage damage did not aggravate significantly in most medial compartment areas, MMME progressed at 1 year postoperatively. No statistical differences were observed in cartilage damage between the central-to-medial area of the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau area at 1 year postoperatively. Regarding semi-quantitative healing scores, the stability score was significantly correlated with the International Cartilage Repair Society grade at 1 year postoperatively. All 1-year and 2-year clinical scores significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores.

CONCLUSION

Regarding TSS repair, stability of repaired meniscal root negatively correlated with cartilage damage in the medial compartment loading area. All 1-year and 2-year clinical scores significantly improved than those of the preoperative scores. Achieving MM stability is crucial for suppressing cartilage degeneration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV case series study.

Shear stress in the medial meniscus posterior root during daily activities

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears have been reported to occur in middle-aged patients with minor trauma. However, the injury mechanism of MMPR tears remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear stress in the MMPR during daily activities using a finite-element analysis.

METHODS

Subject-specific finite-element models of the knee joint of a healthy middle-aged subject were developed from computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images. A three-dimensional motion capture system "VICON" was used to capture four daily activities: walking, jogging, descending stairs, and landing. The knee joint reaction force was estimated using the AnyBody modeling system. Based on these procedures, the shear stress in the MMPR was calculated during each motion. The shear stress in the lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) was also measured to compare the stress between the MMPR and LMPR.

RESULTS

The shear stress in the MMPR increased as the knee flexion angle increased during each motion. Descending stairs caused more than two-fold greater stress in the MMPR than walking and a similar or greater amount of stress than jogging. The LMPR tended to receive more shear stress than the MMPR throughout each motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that descending stairs confers almost the same amount of shear stress to the MMPR as jogging. The results of the present study may suggest that descending motion of the knee is an important cause of MMPR tear, and the initiation of descending stairs should be delayed after MMPR repair.

Toe-out gait inhibits medial meniscus extrusion associated with the second peak of knee adduction moment during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Background

A medial meniscus extrusion (MME) gradually expands during activities of daily living according to the mechanical stress on the medial compartment of the knee. Increase in MME occurs during the stance phase of the gait cycle, which is key for its expand. The knee adduction moment (KAM) represents the mechanical stress on the medial compartment; however, the relationship between the increase in MME and KAM is still unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between MME during gait and KAM.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with medial knee osteoarthritis and 11 healthy middle-aged adults were recruited. Three-dimensional motion analysis system and ultrasonography were used to measure the KAM and MME in the stance phase. The increase in MME was identified as the difference in MME between the maximum and minimum (ΔMME). Patients with knee osteoarthritis performed two conditions as normal and toe-out gait. The difference in KAM and ΔMME between conditions were evaluated.

Results

ΔMME was correlated with the KAM second peak in normal gait of knee osteoarthritis patients (r = 0.51, p < 0.05). Toe-out gait reduced the KAM second peak and the ΔMME, and these reductions were correlated (r = 0.50, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Toe-out gait immediately inhibited the expansion of MME associated with the KAM second peak.

Clinical outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root repair: A midterm follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) cannot prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Conversions of knee arthroplasties are occasionally required following MMPRT repair. However, other knee-related surgical treatments following MMPRT repair are unclear. This study was aimed at investigating the midterm clinical outcomes and knee-related surgical events following MMPRT repair.

METHODS

Patients with MMPRT underwent pullout repair using FasT-Fix modified Mason-Allen (F-MMA) suturing with an all-inside meniscal repair device. Thirty-two patients with follow-up duration >2 years were enrolled. We assessed the clinical outcomes and postoperative surgical treatment of both knees.

RESULTS

F-MMA pullout repair improved all clinical evaluation scores in patients with MMPRT at a mean follow-up of 36.1 months. Postoperative arthroscopic debridement was required for one patient. An additional MMPRT repair was performed in one patient on second-look arthroscopy. None of the patients required ipsilateral knee arthroplasty. In the contralateral knees, one pullout repair of a newly developed MMPRT and two knee arthroplasties were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that F-MMA pullout repair yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, subsequent knee-related surgeries were observed in 6.3% of the pullout-repaired knees and 9.4% of the contralateral knees. Our results suggest that surgeons should be aware of the worsening and/or occurrence of contralateral knee joint disease, even when the postoperative clinical outcomes are satisfactory following MMPRT repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical significance and management of meniscal extrusion in different knee pathologies: a comprehensive review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The menisci are crescent-shaped, fibrocartilaginous structures that play a crucial role in the load transition and distribution of the contact forces along the tibiofemoral articulation. Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a radiological finding, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for which there has been growing interest in recent years. ME, in the coronary plane, is defined as the maximum distance of the most distal end of the meniscus from the border of the tibial plateau, where the tibial eminences are the most prominent, without taking into account the osteophytes. Although there is still controversy in the literature in respect of the optimal cutoff value, a threshold of 3 mm is considered significant. ME has no specific clinical finding or sign and it is encountered in many knee pathologies. It is associated with either rapidly progressive knee osteoarthritis or early onset of knee osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. In this review, we delineate the clinical significance of ME in various knee pathologies, as well as when, why and how it should be managed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elaborate on these topics.

Comparison of two simple stitches and modified Mason-Allen suture for medial meniscus posterior root tear based on the progression of meniscal posterior extrusion: A retrospective cohort study

Purpose: Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root (PR) tear leads to severe MM posterior extrusion (PE), resulting in rapid knee cartilage degeneration. MMPR repairs are recommended to reduce MMPE, especially during knee flexion. However, the difference in MMPE between different repair techniques remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate preoperative and postoperative MMPE following several pullout repair techniques. We hypothesized that a technique using two simple stitches (TSS) would be more useful than FasT-Fix-dependent modified Mason-Allen suture (F-MMA) to prevent the progression of MMPE in knee extension. Methods: This retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent MMPR repair. To compare MMPE, patients were divided into two groups according to the use of F-MMA while grasping the posterior capsule and TSS without grasping it. Open magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 10° and 90° knee flexion preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, and the MMPE of both groups was evaluated. Results: A significant difference was observed between preoperative and 3-month postoperative MMPE at 90° knee flexion in both groups (p < .01). A significant difference was observed in 3- and 12-month postoperative MMPE at 10° knee flexion between both groups (p = .04/.02), whereas no significant difference in the preoperative MMPE at 10° knee flexion was observed between them (p = .45). Conclusions: Both repairs were found to be useful to reduce MMPE in knee flexion. Further, F-MMA repair increased MMPE in knee extension, unlike TSS repair. These findings suggest that TSS might have more advantages for load distribution when standing or walking.

Meniscal Root Repair Alone or Combined with Different Procedures After at Least 6 Months of Follow-Up: A Series of Cases

Purpose

To analyze clinical and functional outcomes of patients submitted to posterior meniscal root repair of the medial or lateral meniscus in different settings, with at least 6 months of follow-up.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective multicentric study assessing epidemiological characteristics and clinical-functional results of 22 patients who underwent meniscal root reinsertion (MRR) by transtibial technique. This study addressed different settings: isolated medial root repair, medial root repair associated with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and lateral root repair associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Results

Twelve patients had an isolated tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus and underwent MRR alone. Six patients had a varus axis >5°, undergoing MRR in addition to HTO in the same surgical procedure. Four patients underwent repair of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus associated with simultaneous reconstruction of the ACL. The main results of the study were observed in the improvement of the IKDC score from 27.7% preoperatively to 69.8% in the postoperative period (p < 0.0001) and the Lysholm score of 44.4 points preoperatively to 88.4 points in the postoperative period (p < 0.0001). Significant clinical and subjective improvements were also reported.

Conclusion

Medial meniscal root repair, associated or not with valgus tibial osteotomy (when indicated) and lateral meniscal root repair associated with ACL reconstruction, improved clinical, functional, and subjective results of the patients presented in this case series in the short term.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/8gGBDD95OIg

Medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A comparison among three surgical techniques in short-term clinical outcomes and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repairs lead to favorable clinical outcomes in patients with MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, there are few comparative studies in evaluating the superiority among several pullout repair techniques such as modified Mason-Allen suture, simple stitch, and concomitant posteromedial pullout repair. We hypothesized that an additional pullout suture at the MM posteromedial part would have clinical advantages in transtibial pullout repairs of the MMPRTs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness among several types of pullout repair techniques in patients with MMPRTs.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs of the MMPRTs were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups using different pullout repair techniques: a modified Mason-Allen suture using FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device (F-MMA, n = 28), two simple stitches (TSS, n = 30), and TSS concomitant with posteromedial pullout repair using all-inside meniscal repair device (TSS-PM, n = 25). Postoperative clinical outcomes and semi-quantitative arthroscopic meniscal healing scores (0-10 points) were evaluated at second-look arthroscopies.

RESULTS

No significant differences among the three groups were observed in patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores, except for preoperative Lysholm scores. At second-look arthroscopies, there were no significant differences among the three techniques in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the TSS-PM pullout repair technique did not show better scores in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healings compared with the F-MMA and TSS techniques. Our results suggest that the concomitant posteromedial pullout suture may have no clinical advantage in the conventional pullout repairs for the patients with MMPRTs.

Medial meniscus posterior root repair reduces the extruded meniscus volume during knee flexion with favorable clinical outcome

PURPOSE

The volume of medial meniscus (MM) extrusion at 10° and 90° knee flexions using three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assessed relevant clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were evaluated.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients who underwent MM posterior root repair were retrospectively reviewed. At 10° and 90° knee flexions, the meniscal extrusion distance and volume were measured using 3D meniscus models constructed by SYNAPSE VINCENT®. The correlation between Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Tegner activity, and pain visual analog scales and changes in MM extrusion were assessed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the MM medial extrusion were observed between 10° and 90° knee flexions postoperatively. MM posterior extrusion (MMPE) decreased significantly at 10° and 90° knee flexions postoperatively. At 90° knee flexion, the meniscus volume at the intra-tibial surface increased at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The MM extrusion volume increased slightly at 10° knee flexion; however, the volume decreased significantly at 90° knee flexion postoperatively. The change in MMPE significantly correlated with clinical scores. All 12-month clinical scores were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The progression of meniscus posterior extrusion and reduction of its volume at 90° knee flexion can be suppressed by MM posterior root repair. Postoperative clinical scores correlated with reductions of the posterior extrusion. Regarding clinical relevance, the dynamic stability of the meniscus can be maintained by MM posterior root repair, which is an effective therapeutic method for improving its clinical status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Accurate placement of a tibial tunnel significantly improves meniscal healing and clinical outcomes at 1 year after medial meniscus posterior root repair

PURPOSE

A medial meniscus posterior root tear results in the loss of meniscal circumferential hoop stress and causes a pathological posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus. Although creating a tibial tunnel in the anatomic place improves postoperative medial meniscus posterior extrusion, no studies have evaluated the relationship between tibial tunnel position and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate how tibial tunnel positioning of medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair affects meniscal healing status and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with 64 medial meniscus posterior root tears (mean age 62.8 ± 7.9 years) who had undergone pullout repairs and second-look arthroscopies were included. All 62 patients were Lachman test negative. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using a rectangular measurement grid to assess the tibial tunnel centre and medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was undertaken to determine displacement distance from the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre to the tibial tunnel centre and a meniscal healing score, as well as clinical outcomes at 1 year post-repair.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel centres were located more anteriorly and medially than the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre (mean distance 5.0 ± 2.2 mm). The mean meniscal healing score was 6.7 ± 1.8 of 10 possible points. The 1-year postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative scores for all the items. There was a significant negative correlation in the absolute distance between the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre and the tibial tunnel centre with the meniscal healing score (ρ =  - 0.39, p = 0.002). Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between the distance between the medial meniscus posterior root attachment centre and the tibial tunnel centre in the mediolateral direction and patient-based clinical outcomes (ρ = 0.25-0.43, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Accurate placement of a tibial tunnel, especially in the mediolateral direction, significantly improved meniscal healing and clinical outcomes at 1 year following medial meniscus posterior root repair. Surgeons should create a medial meniscus posterior root tibial tunnel at the anatomic attachment with particular attention to the mediolateral position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: effects on the meniscus healing score and ICRS grade among patients with mild osteoarthritis of the knee

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) among patients with early osteoarthritis of the knee as measured by the meniscus healing score and to determine whether the meniscus healing score correlates with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade progression.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with mild osteoarthritic knees (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤ 2 and varus alignment < 5°) who underwent transtibial pullout repair less than 3 months after MMPRT onset were assessed. The association between meniscus healing scores at 1 year postoperatively and cartilage damage of the medial compartment (medial femoral condyle [MFC] and medial tibial plateau [MTP]) were evaluated. The MFC was divided into six zones (A to F) and the MTP into two zones (G and H). The mean ICRS grade for each zone was compared between the primary surgery and second-look arthroscopy. The correlation between cartilage damage and meniscus healing status at the time of second-look arthroscopy in each zone was analysed.

RESULTS

The mean time interval from injury to surgery was 63 days, and all clinical scores showed significant improvement. There were no significant differences in the extent of cartilage damage in areas B, C, E, or F (n.s.) for MFC or in areas G and H (n.s.) for MTP. The meniscus healing score and cartilage damage were correlated in the loading areas (B, C, E, and H; - 0.53, - 0.45, - 0.33, and - 0.38, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transtibial pullout repair of MMPRTs among patients with mild osteoarthritic knees improved the clinical outcomes and showed a negative correlation between high meniscus healing scores and ICRS grades in the medial compartment loading area. This study suggests that early surgery should be undertaken for patients with mild osteoarthritic knee who develop MMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Posterior Root Repair of Medial Meniscus Combined With Valgus Opening Wedge Tibial Osteotomy

The medial meniscal root tear, a particular meniscal injury at the level of its posterior bone insertion, leads to a loss of impact absorption and load distribution capacity, similar to total meniscectomy. Therefore, its repair is fundamental for knee joint longevity. This type of injury often occurs in middle-aged patients with lower limbs varus malalignment, which results in mechanical overloading of the medial compartment and induces premature cartilage wear out. The success of meniscal root repair, with meniscal bone reinsertion, depends on the correction and realignment of varus deformities greater than 5° for physiological levels. In this situation, corrective tibial osteotomy combined with meniscal repair is indicated. Our goal is to describe the step-by-step technique of the valgus opening wedge tibial osteotomy combined with the arthroscopic reinsertion of the posterior meniscal root in tibia during the treatment of a patient with varus deformity and medial meniscus root tear.

Steep medial tibial slope and prolonged delay to surgery are associated with bilateral medial meniscus posterior root tear

PURPOSE

Contralateral medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) can sometimes occur after primary surgeries for MMPRT and lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. The incidence rate and risk factors for contralateral MMPRT have not been well investigated, despite their clinical importance. Therefore, the incidence and predictors of bilateral MMPRT were aimed to be evaluated.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with bilateral MMPRT (group B) and 169 patients with unilateral MMPRT (group U) were enrolled in this study. Sex, age, body mass index, time between injury and surgery, and medial tibial slope angle (MTSA) were compared between the groups. MTSA was measured using lateral radiographs.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of bilateral MMPRT was 6.2% among all patients with MMPRTs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a prolonged time between injury and surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.01; P < 0.05) and steeper MTSA (OR, 1.85; 95% CI 1.21-2.64; P < 0.01) were significantly associated with the development of bilateral MMPRT. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that MTSA > 10.0° was associated with bilateral MMPRT, with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 69%.

CONCLUSION

A longer time between injury and surgery and steeper MTSA were risk factors for the development of bilateral MMPRT. Surgeons need to pay close attention to the contralateral knee in addition to the primary injured knees when treating knees with steep MTSA. Besides, early meniscal repair of primary MMPRT would be important to prevent the events of contralateral MMPRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the medial meniscus posterior extrusion at 90° of knee flexion following medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tibial tunnel position in pullout repair for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (MMPRT) on postoperative MM extrusion.

METHODS

Thirty patients (median age 63 years, range 35-72 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repairs for MMPRTs were included. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using a rectangular measurement grid for assessment of tibial tunnel position and MM posterior root attachment. Preoperative and postoperative MM medial extrusion (MMME) and posterior extrusion (MMPE) at 10° and 90° knee flexion were measured using open magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel centers were located more anteriorly and more medially than the anatomic center (median distance 5.8 mm, range 0-9.3 mm). The postoperative MMPE at 90° knee flexion was significantly reduced after pullout repair, although there was no significant reduction in MMME or MMPE at 10° knee flexion after surgery. In the correlation analysis of the displacement between the anatomic center to the tibial tunnel center and improvements in MMME, and MMPE at 10° and 90° knee flexion, there was a significant positive correlation between percentage distance and improvement of MMPE at 90° knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the nearer the tibial tunnel position to the anatomic attachment of the MM posterior root, the more effective the reduction in MMPE at 90° knee flexion. Our results emphasize that an anatomic tibial tunnel should be created in the MM posterior root to improve the postoperative MMPE and protect the articular cartilage in a knee flexion position. Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the MMPE at 90° of knee flexion after MM posterior root pullout repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Diagnostic performance of open MRI in the flexed knee position for the detection of medial meniscus ramp lesions

OBJECTIVES

To identify the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the knee-flexed position for the detection of meniscal ramp lesions in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients (mean age 24.5 ± 9.5 years; 21 males, 22 females) with an arthroscopically proven anterior cruciate ligament tear were included in this retrospective study. The presence of the following two important features on MRI was recorded: irregularity of the medial meniscus at the posterior margin, and complete fluid filling between the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the capsule margin. Findings obtained in arthroscopy served as the reference standard. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and inter-observer agreement were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixteen ramp lesions were noted on arthroscopy (37.2%). With an irregularity of the medial meniscus at the posterior margin on MRI, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 and 59.3% at 10° knee flexion and 93.8 and 85.2% at 90° flexion, respectively. The complete fluid filling sign on MRI showed sensitivity and specificity of 31.3 and 100% at 10° knee flexion and 87.5 and 100% at 90° flexion, respectively. The concordance between the two observers for the two MRI features was very good (k = 0.70-0.88).

CONCLUSION

MRI with the knee in the flexed position improves the diagnostic performance of the detection of meniscal ramp lesions compared with MRI with the knee in the extended position.

Posterior Meniscal Root Repair Using a Meniscal Suture Device

A greater understanding of the deleterious consequences that a meniscal root tear brings to the knee joint and how its surgical repair can be advantageous over the previously used treatment strategies brings the need for the development of surgical techniques that make the procedure less complex and more reproducible. When meniscal root rupture occurs, a mechanical overload occurs in the affected compartment similar to a total meniscectomy. Several authors have concluded that meniscal root reinsertion significantly improves postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction, regardless of age or laterality of the meniscal injury. The Meniscus 4 A-II device (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) allows stitching at the root of the medial and lateral menisci. In this article, we describe the surgical repair technique for posterior-medial and -lateral meniscal root tears using this meniscal suture device. This technique is fast and effective.