Joint gap produced by manual stress is dependent on the surgeon's experience and is smaller in flexion in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Functional preoperative assessment of coronal knee laxity better predicts postoperative patient outcomes than intraoperative surgeon-defined laxity in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Intraoperative laxity assessments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are subjective, with few studies comparing against standardised preoperative and postoperative assessments. This study compares coronal knee laxity in TKA patients awake and anaesthetised, preprosthesis and postprosthesis implantation, evaluating relationships to patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 49 TKA joints included preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans, stress radiographs and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) questionnaire results preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The imaging was used to assess functional laxity (FL) in awake patients, whereas computer navigation measured intraoperative surgical laxity (SL) preimplantation and postimplantation, with patients anaesthetised. Varus and valgus stress states and their difference, joint laxity, were measured.

RESULTS

SL was greater than FL in both preimplantation [8.1° (interquartile range, IQR 2.0°) and 3.8° (IQR 2.9°), respectively] and postimplantation [3.5° (IQR 2.3°) and 2.5° (IQR 2.7°), respectively]. Preimplantation, SL was more likely than FL to categorise knees as correctable to ±3° of the mechanical axis. Preoperative FL correlated with KOOS Symptoms (r = 0.33, p = .02) and quality of life (QOL) (r = 0.38, p = .01), whereas reducing medial laxity with TKA enhanced postoperative QOL outcomes (p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional coronal knee laxity assessment of awake patients is generally lower than intraoperative surgical assessments of anaesthetised patients. Preoperative SL may result in overcorrection of coronal TKA alignment, whereas preoperative FL better predicts postoperative patient outcomes and reflects the patients' native and tolerable knee laxity. Preoperative FL assessment can be used to guide surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview

Knee arthritis is a common degenerative joint disease, usually with joint swelling, chronic pain, and dysfunction as the main clinical manifestations. At present, the conservative treatment for knee arthritis is mostly using anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs, but the effect is mostly temporary, and can not prevent its progress and surgery is usually the last treatment method. Total knee arthroplasty, also known as TKA, is one of the most effective treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee that has progressed to the end stage. The inevitable human factor in conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) frequently results in poor positioning of the prosthesis during the reconstruction of the lower limb's biomechanical axis. This can lead to severe postoperative pain, accelerated wear of the prosthesis, early loosening, and other problems in the affected knee, which has always been a primary concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Over the course of the past few years, China has gradually begun to develop joint robots. The idea is to plan the surgical plan based on the anatomical structure of the affected limb before the operation, and then to use a mechanical arm and a visual system to assist in the implantation of the prosthesis while the operation is being performed. The treatment costs of robot-assisted technology, on the other hand, vary greatly, and there is still a relatively small amount of high-quality evidence on clinical efficacy. This is because the field of robotic-assisted technology is a relatively new one that has gradually developed over the past few years. In order to provide a fundamental reference for the application value of new treatment methods for advanced knee osteoarthritis, it is necessary to conduct an analysis of the current status of the application of joint robots, as well as the technical advantages and disadvantages that they bring.This narrative study delineates the historical context and current clinical application of robots in knee replacement surgery. An examination of the advantages and disadvantages of RATKA in comparison to TKA offers insights on the prospective application value of the technology.Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Intraoperative lateral laxity greater than 4° is associated with inferior functional improvement in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the impact of intraoperative lateral laxity at extension on clinical and functional outcomes 1 year after posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA).

METHODS

In total, 91 varus-type osteoarthritic knees that underwent PS-TKA using the medial preservation gap technique were included. After the femoral trial component placement and patellofemoral joint reduction, the soft-tissue balance was assessed using an offset-type tensor with a 40-lb joint-distraction force. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to the intraoperative lateral laxity at extension (i.e., varus ligament balance) using the mean ± 1 standard deviation: Groups A, ≤0°; B, 0-4°; and C, >4°. The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and 3-m timed up-and-go test (TUG) time 1-year postoperatively, and their improvements were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

While significant improvements were observed in all subscales of the 2011 KSS and TUG post-TKA (p < 0.05), the improvement of functional activities and TUG time were significantly lower in Group C than in Group B (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in symptom improvement, patient satisfaction or patient expectation scores among the groups.

CONCLUSION

An excessive lateral laxity (varus angle) >4° at extension was associated with lower improvement in functional ability 1-year postoperatively. Therefore, excessive intraoperative lateral laxity should be avoided in PS-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament-guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There is a lack of literature evaluating outcomes of the ligament-guided approach in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An improved comprehension of the distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns and their associations with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and implant survivorship could provide insights into its further application in daily practice.

METHODS

A registry was reviewed for patients with a minimal 2-year follow-up who underwent robotic-assisted, ligament-guided, medial UKA between 2008 and 2016. Survivorship and postoperative PROMs were collected. CPAK phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns were determined. Survivorship, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala and patient satisfaction were compared between phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 618 knees were included at a mean follow-up of 4.1 [2.0-9.6] years. Four-year conversion to the TKA survival rate was 98.9% [98.4%-99.3%] and 94.3% [93.3%-95.3%] for all-cause revision. Patients with preservation of the CPAK phenotype (84.5 ± 14.9, 81.8 ± 15.5, p = 0.033) and restoration of prearthritic coronal alignment (84.1 ± 14.9, 81.7 ± 15.9, p = 0.045) had a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in survivorship or PROMs were observed between phenotypes or sagittal tibial wear patterns. Additionally, no difference in survival rates was observed between preserved or altered phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that preservation of CPAK phenotype and preservation of prearthritic coronal alignment yielded a significantly higher Kujala score. No other significant differences in PROMs or implant survivorship were observed, suggesting that robotic-assisted, ligament-guided medial UKA provides equal outcomes for all observed phenotypes and sagittal tibial wear patterns in medial compartment OA as long as preoperative CPAK phenotype is preserved postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Reliability of pre-resection ligament tension assessment in imageless robotic assisted total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Ligament tension balance is a major determinant for the success of total knee replacement (TKR). The present study aimed at determining the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in performing ligament tension assessment using an imageless robotic-assisted TKR.

METHODS

Twenty-four knees in 21 patients who received robotic-assisted TKR for end-stage varus osteoarthritis were examined. Three orthopedic specialists and six orthopedic trainees participated in the operations. Data from the ligament tension assessment were collected during the operations.

RESULTS

For the inter-rater reliability, "extension medial" and "flexion medial" had excellent reliability whilst "extension lateral" and "flexion lateral" had good-to-excellent reliability. For the intra-rater reliability, "extension medial" showed excellent reliability, "extension lateral" and "flexion medial" showed good-to-excellent reliability, and "flexion lateral" showed moderate-to-excellent reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted technology provides a reliable solution to improve ligament tension assessment. All ligament tension assessments with the use of the technology could demonstrate at least good-to-excellent reliability except for the intra-rater reliability of "flexion lateral".

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients

Purpose

One of the most common types of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) is type I, which is characterised by varus alignment and apex distal joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of changes in arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) with both postoperative joint laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with CPAK type I following mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Of 111 consecutive knees in 92 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA, 80 knees (72.0%) with CPAK type I phenotype preoperatively were evaluated. All TKAs were performed to achieve neutral MA by a medial stabilising gap balancing technique. Pre- to postoperative change in aHKA was defined as ΔaHKA. The 80 CPAK type I knees were divided into a larger ΔaHKA group (>7°) and a smaller ΔaHKA group (≤7°). PROMs, including the Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative joint laxity was assessed using a Telos arthrometer.

Results

Twenty-two knees showed a larger ΔaHKA, and postoperative lateral joint laxity in varus stress was significantly greater in these patients than in those with a smaller ΔaHKA (6.8° vs. 4.5°, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in PROMs (p = n.s.).

Conclusions

Postoperative lateral laxity was associated with larger aHKA changes than smaller aHKA changes in CPAK type I knees after TKA. However, no statistically significant differences in PROMs were found according to the amount of change in aHKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with an anatomically designed implant can restore constitutional coronal lower limb alignment

PURPOSE

Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA) may not restore the constitutional varus alignment in most patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to investigate (1) the extent to which constitutional lower limb alignment can be restored by rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant and (2) which lower limb alignment parameters are associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

This study included 60 patients who underwent rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant. Radiographic alignment parameters, including mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), coronal hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), coronal joint line obliquity (JLO), posterior tibial slope (PTS), single-leg standing knee flexion angle (KFA), sagittal JLO, and arithmetic HKA (aHKA), were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) was used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

The mLDFA, MPTA, and aHKA showed no significant differences before and after surgery. Coronal HKA and PTS have significantly changed from 8.1 ± 8.7° and 9.9 ± 8.6° preoperatively to 3.5 ± 3.1° and 2.5 ± 2.0° postoperatively, respectively (p < 0.001 for each comparison). The postoperative WOMAC total score was significantly correlated with the KFA (r = 0.4063, p = 0.0034) and sagittal JLO (r = -0.3435, p = 0.0157). Postoperative KFA is a causal factor for the increased postoperative WOMAC total score (r = 1.416, 95% confidence interval: 0.491-2.342, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

rKA-TKA using an anatomically designed implant can restore constitutional coronal lower limb alignment, while postoperative KFA and sagittal JLO were associated with poor PROMs. Care should be taken for the postoperative KFA because it is a risk factor for poor PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.