1
|
Larkin T, Martinez V, Scully T, Martinez D, Hayes C, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Upper Limb Spasticity: The Quality of Online Patient Resources. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:18-23. [PMID: 37256662 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to assess the quality, readability, content, accessibility, and structure of online resources for patients with upper limb spasticity. DESIGN This was a cross sectional study examined Internet searches across three search engines related to patient resources for upper limb spasticity. Search phrases for either hand or upper limb spasticity were used. The top 20 Websites from each search were evaluated using the four readability metrics and the DISCERN scale for quality assessment. YouTube videos with exact search phrases were evaluated using DISCERN. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS Thirty-six Websites and 33 videos met the inclusion criteria for this study. The average Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level of the Websites was 11.7 ± 3.1, showing low Website readability. According to this index, only two Websites were written at the suggested sixth-grade level (5.4%). With a maximum score of 75, the mean DISCERN score for both Websites and videos scored in the "good" range (53.5 ± 8 and 50.5 ± 6.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Current online resources for upper limb spasticity are good in quality but are written above the health literacy level of American citizens. Organizations should consider reviewing their present materials and developing high-quality patient education materials that are easier to understand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Larkin
- From the University of the Incarnate Word, School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, Texas (TL, VM, TS); University of Houston, Fertitta Family College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (DM); and UT Health San Antonio, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, San Antonio, Texas (CH, MV-G)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vågenes H, Pranić SM. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023; 21:44. [PMID: 37189154 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online information about PCOS lacks reliability for patients seeking information about the disease. Thus, we aimed to perform an updated analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on PCOS available online. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using the top five Google Trends search terms in English associated with PCOS, including "symptoms," "treatment," "test," "pregnancy," and "causes." Five separate searches in Bing, Yahoo, and Google were performed to obtain the first 10 unique webpages for each term that was categorized as commercial, non-profit organization, scientific resources, or private foundation. We used the 16-item DISCERN with Likert-responses (minimum 1, maximum 5) where the total is 80 and lowest is 16, clarity with the 32-item EQIP, where responses of no = 0 and yes = 1 (minimum 0, maximum 32), and accuracy scores with 1 denoting poor and 5 completely accurate information; low scores of each corresponded to poorly reported information. We assessed readability with Flesch-Kincaid reading ease index, where higher scores correspond to reading ease, and lower grades correspond to easier readability with Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning-Fog, Coleman-Liau index, automated readability index, New Dale-Chall Readability, and simple measure of gobbledygook. We additionally assessed word and sentence characteristics. We used Kruskal-Wallis test to compare scores according to webpage categories. RESULTS Out of 150 webpages, most were commercial (n = 85, 57%), followed by non-profit organizations (n = 44, 29%), scientific resources (n = 13, 9%) and private foundations (n = 6, 4%). Google webpages had higher median DISCERN score ([Md] = 47.0) than Bing ([Md] = 42.0) and Yahoo ([Md] = 43.0) webpages; P = 0.023. No difference in EQIP scores according to search engine was found (P = 0.524). Predominantly, webpages from private foundations had higher DISCERN and EQIP scores, although comparisons were not statistically significant (P = 0.456) and P = 0.653.). Accuracy and readability were similar across search engines and webpage categories (P = 0.915, range 5.0-5.0) and (P = 0.208, range 4.0-5.0). CONCLUSIONS Quality and clarity of the data were fair according to search engine and category. Accuracy of information was high, showing that the public may encounter accurate information about PCOS. However, the readability of the information was high, reflecting a need for more readable resources about PCOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Vågenes
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Shelly Melissa Pranić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia.
- Cochrane Croatia, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Divakova O, Panayi D, Khan Z, Doumouchtsis SK. A rapid systematic review of postpartum bladder care guidelines and recommendations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:2634-2642. [PMID: 36222025 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2126751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
New pathways for the management of postpartum voiding dysfunction and postpartum urinary retention should be considered to shorten hospital stays and promote early discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic. This rapid systematic review aimed to identify relevant national and international guidelines, and summarise available recommendations on postpartum bladder care that are relevant to women's care and management at the time of the pandemic. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane from inception till September 2021. Hand-searching of national and international specialist societies' websites was performed. We identified one international technical consultation, one international society's report of recommendations and two national guidelines. Guidelines stated that postnatal women should not be left more than 6 hours without voiding and assessed for postpartum urinary retention. As the cut-off of 150 ml for the diagnosis of significant postvoid residual volume is commonly used with no reported adverse outcomes, it could be beneficial to adopt this instead of 100 ml as further unnecessary interventions can be avoided. Such changes can reduce the number of women staying in the hospital. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation for the management of postpartum urinary retention could be considered as an option during the COVID-19 pandemic aiming to shorten hospital stays and avoid further attendances. Optimised bladder care has become more relevant during the coronavirus pandemic by striving towards self-care, community-based and remote care. We propose consideration of intermittent self-catheterisation in cases of postpartum urinary retention enabling self-care and avoidance of hospital visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Divakova
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust, St Helier Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carshalton, UK
| | - Demetri Panayi
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust, St Helier Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carshalton, UK
| | - Zainab Khan
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust, St Helier Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carshalton, UK
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
- St Helier Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carshalton, UK
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N. S. Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
- St George's University of London, London, UK
- School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA
- School of Medicine, Ross University, Miramar, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Loganathan J, Ghai V, Ilaalagan R, Doumouchtsis SK. Vulvodynia: What is available online? A systematic review of information on the internet. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:2112-2121. [PMID: 35699223 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM This review aimed to evaluate the quality of medicalinformation online for patients relating to vulvodynia. To our knowledge no evaluation of online patient information exists regarding vulvodynia and, at present, there is no standardized or validated method of evaluating medical information on the internet. METHODS A clearly defined protocol was developed to generate keywords relating to vulvodynia. The three most popular search engines worldwide; google.com, yahoo.com, and bing.com, were searched in September 2020. Three assessors evaluated eligible webpages for accuracy, credibility, readability, and reliability. RESULTS Forty-five webpages were eligible with 38% given HON certification or Information Standard approval. Only one webpage achieved a DISCERN score of ≥63 indicating excellent reliability. No webpages scored a maximum 10 points for credibility. Eleven percent of webpages were rated "accurate" with score 17 or above. The modal Flesch Kincaid Grade Level was 9 with only 15.6% having a readability grade level of 8 or less. CONCLUSIONS It has been shown in previous studies that patient information available online pertaining to gynecological conditions is frequently inaccurate, with limited regulation and low reliability, and our findings are in agreement with this. As patients increasingly look to the internet for medical information and education, we as clinicians, need to ensure the resources available are of a high standard and regulated. Without ensuring safe and effective healthcare resources, we risk misinformation which can negatively impact clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemina Loganathan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
| | - Vishalli Ghai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK
| | | | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Epsom, UK.,St George's University of London, London, UK.,Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research "N.S. Christeas", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.,School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten.,School of Medicine, Ross University, Miramar, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Markaryan DR, Lukyanov AM, Garmanova TN, Agapov MA, Kubyshkin VA. [Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2022:127-132. [PMID: 35658144 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2022061127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A review of the current national and foreign literature is devoted to epidemiology, risk factors, causes, diagnosis and modern treatment approaches for fecal incontinence (FI). Incidence of FI in early and delayed period after childbirth is 30% or more. At the same time, up to 87% of postpartum injuries of anal sphincter remain undiagnosed. Importantly, routine caesarean section does not reduce the risk of incontinence. In addition to typical complaints of spontaneous gas and stool, diagnosis of FI after childbirth includes transrectal ultrasound, MRI, anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. Survey of proctologists from different regions of Russia revealed a high demand from medical community for educational programs devoted to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with postpartum perineal injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A M Lukyanov
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - M A Agapov
- Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moussa R, Rada MP, Durnea C, Falconi G, Betschart C, Haddad JM, Sedgwick P, Doumouchtsis SK. Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacological management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) in women; a systematic review for the development of core outcome sets (COS). Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:1243-1250. [PMID: 35006311 PMCID: PMC9120103 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05040-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Evidence on OAB management remains suboptimal and methodological limitations in randomized control trials (RCTs) affect their comparability. High quality meta-analyses are lacking. This study aimed to compare selection and reporting of outcomes and outcome measures across RCTs as well as evaluate methodological quality and outcome reporting quality as a first stage in the process of developing core outcome sets (COS). METHODS RCTs were searched using Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, ICTRP and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to January 2020, in English language, on adult women. Pharmacological management, interventions, sample size, journal type and commercial funding were documented. Methodological and outcome reporting quality were evaluated using JADAD and MOMENT scores. RESULTS Thirty-eight trials (18,316 women) were included. Sixty-nine outcomes were reported, using 62 outcome measures. The most commonly reported outcome domains were efficacy (86.8%), safety (73.7%) and QoL (60.5%). The most commonly reported outcomes in each domain were urgency urinary incontinence episodes (UUI) (52.6%), antimuscarinic side effects (76.3%) and change in validated questionnaire scores (36.8%). A statistically significant correlation was found between JADAD and MOMENT (Spearman's rho = 0.548, p < 0.05) scores. This indicates that higher methodological quality is associated with higher outcome reporting quality. CONCLUSIONS Development of COS and core outcome measure sets will address variations and lead to higher quality evidence. We recommend the most commonly reported outcomes in each domain, as interim COS. For efficacy we recommend: UUI episodes, urgency and nocturia episodes; for safety: antimuscarinic adverse events, other adverse events and discontinuation rates; for QoL: OAB-q, PPBC and IIQ scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Moussa
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria Patricia Rada
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology, "luliu Hatieganu", University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Constantin Durnea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, UK
| | - Gabriele Falconi
- Complex Operative Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Jorge Milhem Haddad
- Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Philip Sedgwick
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, London, UK.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
- American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.
- Ross University, School of Medicine, Miramar, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khan K, Rada M, Elfituri A, Betschart C, Falconi G, Haddad JM, Doumouchtsis SK. Outcome reporting in trials on conservative interventions for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review for the development of a core outcome set. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 268:100-109. [PMID: 34894536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant risk of bias and limitations in outcome selections in trials evaluating conservative treatments for the management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) have been highlighted and preclude comparability of outcomes, synthesis of primary studies and high quality evidence. OBJECTIVES As systematic review of the reported outcomes is the first step in the process of development of a Core Outcome Set (COS), we aimed to systematically review reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) on conservative treatments for POP and develop an inventory of them for consideration as core outcome and outcome measures sets. We evaluated methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics and their associations among published RCTs. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review of RCTs identified from the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and MEDLINE (Pubmed). RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions for the management of POP were considered for inclusion. Outcomes and outcome measures were obtained from the RCTs and an inventory was created. Outcomes were grouped in domains and themes. Methodological quality, outcome reporting quality and publication characteristics were evaluated and statistically analysed. RESULTS Twenty-five trials (3179 women) were included and reported 31 outcomes and 50 outcome measures. Reporting rates of the outcomes investigated ranged between 4% and 56%. The most commonly reported outcome domains were patient reported symptoms, stage of POP expressed as POP-Q stage, and quality of life. Univariate analysis demonstrated no significant correlations of methodological and outcome reporting parameters. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to increase comparability of RCTs. Reporting standardized outcomes included in a COS for conservative interventions for POP will facilitate the comparability across RCTs. While the process of developing COS is in progress, we propose the interim use of the three most commonly reported outcomes in each domain: patient-reported outcomes (symptom distress including bowel and urinary symptoms, sexual function), stage of prolapse and quality of life parameters using validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire/Health related quality of life (PFIQ-7/HRQOL) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ-7).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimmee Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Maria Rada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Abdullatif Elfituri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Cornelia Betschart
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Falconi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Complex Operative Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Jorge Milhem Haddad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Urogynaecology Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK; Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N. S. Christeas, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece; St George's University of London, London, UK; American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA; Ross University, School of Medicine, Miramar, FL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsiapakidou S, Nygaard CC, Falconi G, Pape J, Betschart C, Doumouchtsis SK. Systematic review and appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on pelvic organ prolapse using the AGREE II tool. Neurourol Urodyn 2021; 40:1402-1413. [PMID: 34350610 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To systematically evaluate the content and quality of national and international clinical guidelines on pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS We searched medical databases and organizations websites, to identify national and international guidelines on diagnosis and management of POP. Five authors independently assessed guidelines using the validated AGREE II tool. Its six domains include (1) scope and purpose, (2) stakeholder involvement, (3) rigor of development, (4) clarity of presentation, (5) applicability, and (6) editorial independence. RESULTS Eight guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Three hundred and thirteen different recommendations were identified. One hundred and ninety-nine recommendations were comparable across guidelines. Thirty-one recommendations were not supported by research evidence. Assessment by history and physical examination using the POP quantification system and consideration of imaging were recommendations featuring in all guidelines. Conservative treatment recommendations namely pelvic floor muscle training and vaginal pessaries were also found in all guidelines. Regarding surgical management, patient counseling, treating only symptomatic POP, consideration of apical fixation during surgical treatment, and use of biological or synthetic implants in recurrent cases were recommendations in all guidelines. Overall, the highest median scores were in the domains "scope and purpose" and "rigor of development". The lowest median score was for applicability (28.3%). Although the median score of "editorial independence" was high (85.4%), variability was also substantial (interquartile range: 12.5-100). CONCLUSION We identified variations in quality and deficiencies in certain areas, especially "applicability" and "editorial independence." Improvements in these key domains may enhance the quality and clinical impact of clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Tsiapakidou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christiana Campani Nygaard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Medical School, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Gabriele Falconi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "San Bortolo" Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Janna Pape
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Betschart
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, London, UK
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S. Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten
- Ross University, School of Medicine, Miramar, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oman SP, Zaver H, Waddle M, Corral JE. Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cysts: DISCERN and Readability Test Analysis. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e25602. [PMID: 33724203 PMCID: PMC8088856 DOI: 10.2196/25602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cysts are a complex medical problem with several treatment options. Patients use web-based health information to understand their conditions and to guide treatment choices. Objective The goal of this study was to describe the quality and readability of publicly available web-based information on pancreatic cysts and to compare this information across website affiliations. Methods A Google search for “pancreatic cysts” was performed and the first 30 websites were evaluated. Website affiliations were classified as academic, media, nonprofit, government, or not disclosed. Information describing cancer risk was recorded. The DISCERN instrument measured the quality of content regarding treatment choices. Four standardized tests were used to measure readability. Results Twenty-one websites were included. The majority of the websites (20/21, 95%) described the cancer risk associated with pancreatic cysts. Nearly half of the websites were written by an academic hospital or organization. The average DISCERN score for all websites was 40.4 (range 26-65.5, maximum 80). Websites received low scores due to lack of references, failure to describe the risks of treatment, or lack of details on how treatment choices affect quality of life. The average readability score was 14.74 (range 5.76-23.85, maximum 19+), indicating a college reading level. There were no significant differences across website affiliation groups. Conclusions Web-based information for patients with pancreatic cysts is of moderate quality and is written above the reading level of most Americans. Gastroenterological, cancer treatment organizations, and physicians should advocate for improving the available information by providing cancer risk stratification, treatment impact on quality of life, references, and better readability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven P Oman
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Himesh Zaver
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Mark Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Juan E Corral
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsiapakidou S, Campani Nygaard C, Pape J, de Mattos Lourenço TR, Falconi G, Betschart C, Doumouchtsis SK. Evaluation of guidelines on the use of vaginal mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse using the AGREE II instrument. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 154:400-411. [PMID: 33486756 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the content and quality of national and international guidelines on vaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect from inception to March 2020 and organizations' websites. The quality of the guidelines was assessed independently by six appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS Five guidelines were included. Most guidelines recommended individualized treatments, clinical observation, and conservative treatment for asymptomatic women discouraging the use of mesh. Vaginal pessary and pelvic floor muscle training are unanimously considered effective treatments. Only two guidelines recommended weight loss. Each guideline recommended patient counseling supported by data on success rates and complications. Most guidelines highlighted the importance of a specialist experienced surgeon, multidisciplinary teams, and national/international registries. All guidelines highlighted potential benefits of the use of mesh and reported possible complications. The overall quality rating ranged between 4.2 and 6.3, suggestive of moderate to high quality. The highest mean score (92.5%) pertained to "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity of Presentation", and the lowest to "Editorial Independence" (18%). Three out of five guidelines were "strongly recommended" by the appraisers. CONCLUSION Although most guidelines were of moderate to high quality, methodological applicability, stakeholder involvement, and editorial independence were domains with low scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Tsiapakidou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christiana Campani Nygaard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Janna Pape
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thais R de Mattos Lourenço
- Department of Urogynecology, Discipline of Gynecology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriele Falconi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Complex Operative Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Cornelia Betschart
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.,St George's University of London, London, UK.,School of Medicine, American University of the Caribbean, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Googling fibroids: A critical appraisal of information available on the internet. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 250:224-230. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
12
|
A systematic review of internet-based information for individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon and patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2363-2367. [PMID: 32152916 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05023-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients are increasingly using internet-based information to inform healthcare utilization and treatment decisions. Our aim was to examine the quality and readability of internet-based information relating to Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review of three commonly used search engines (Google®, Yahoo®, and Bing®) using the terms "Raynaud's phenomenon" and "systemic sclerosis" separately. The first 30 websites per search engine were examined. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire and readability by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG Index, Coleman-Liau index, and Flesch Reading Ease score. RESULTS Fifty-two studies (30 RP and 22 SSc) were included after duplicates and exclusion criteria were applied. The overall quality of information was low for both SSc and RP (1.99 & 2.21), including in relation to reliability of the literature and information on treatment choices. Readability for RP and SSc was also poor (i.e., the texts were difficult to read) across all of the four methods examined. CONCLUSION Overall, RP and SSc internet-based information is of low quality and inadequate readability. The RP and SSc international community should strongly consider developing an information standard for internet-based resources for healthcare users. KEY POINTS • Patients with SSc and RP are increasingly using internet/online sources of information and support. • RP represents an important opportunity for the early diagnosis of SSc. • The overall quality and readability of internet-based RP and SSc information is poor. • Internet-based RP and SSc information requires improvement to facilitate early diagnosis and inform shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Vrachnis N, Doumouchtsis SK. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247:94-100. [PMID: 32087423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Several studies have investigated the importance of maternal, fetal factors and intrapartum characteristics in predicting severe perineal lacerations. The purpose of the present systematic review is to accumulate current evidence and provide estimated effect sizes for the various risk factors described. We reviewed Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar for published studies in the field for observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials. Two researchers independently assessed the included studies and documented outcomes. Data extraction was performed using a modified data form that was based in Cochrane`s data collection form for intervention reviews for RCTs and non-RCTs. Forty-three articles were selected for inclusion in the present systematic review. The analyzed population reached 716,031 parturient of whom 22,280 (3,1%) sustained third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. Several risk factors were identified. Instrumental delivery [RR 3.38 (2.21, 5.18)], midline episiotomy [RR 2.88 (1.79, 4.65)] and a persistent occiput posterior position [RR 2.73 (2.08, 3.58)] were associated with the higher risk of developing severe perineal lacerations. Mediolateral episiotomy did not increase, but was also not protective against perineal lacerations [RR 1.55 (0.95, 2.53)]. Several factors contribute to the development of severe perineal lacerations. The present meta-analysis presents accumulated data that may help physicians estimate risks and provide appropriate patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasilios Pergialiotis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Ioannis Bellos
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Fanaki
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Vrachnis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Stergios K Doumouchtsis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Braga A, Caccia G, Papadia A, Torella M. Atraumatic childbirth: is it a utopia? Int Urogynecol J 2019; 31:671-672. [PMID: 31828404 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04205-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Braga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Turconi 23 CP 1652, 6850, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
| | - Giorgio Caccia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Turconi 23 CP 1652, 6850, Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC Civico Hospital, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marco Torella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Faculty, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|