Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in prolapse repair: A prospective study on pre-emptive uterosacral/cervical block

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been introduced in gynecology. Postoperative pain management after vaginal procedures remains a relevant issue. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-emptive uterosacral/cervical block (PUCB) for postoperative pain control in patients with uterovaginal prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor repair. We also evaluated the impact on the length of recovery.

METHODS

This was a pilot study analyzing 40 women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse repair through uterosacral ligament suspension. Patients who chose to undergo PUCB were considered as cases, otherwise as controls. After general or spinal anesthesia induction, the treatment group received the PUCB with ropivacaine plus clonidine injections at 2, 4, 8, and 10 o'clock of the cervix. The control group did not receive additional treatment. Pain intensity was measured at rest and after forceful cough at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in pain values at 1 h (rest and forceful cough) and 24 h (forceful cough) in the PUCB group. The incidence of moderate/severe pain was inferior in the PUCB group at 1 h (rest) and 24 h (rest and forceful cough). There were no differences in terms of the use of rescue opioids (0% vs. 5%; P = 0.311) and length of hospital stay (2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6; P = 0.180).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we demonstrated the impact of pre-emptive uterosacral/cervical block on pain control up to 24 h after surgery. Clonidine as a sensory blockade extender appears promising in enhancing the efficacy of local anesthetics.

A systematic review of uterine cervical elongation and meta-analysis of Manchester repair

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to consolidate current research on cervical elongation, a common but often overlooked complication in pelvic organ prolapse and hysteropexy procedures. It seeks to define, diagnose, and manage cervical elongation, aiming to establish standardized criteria and strategies to enhance clinical outcomes for this condition.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was executed utilizing the keywords: "cervical elongation," "long cervix uteri," "Manchester," and "cervical amputation". Data were gathered and organized in an Excel spreadsheet, with the analysis conducted according to each category, methodology, or reference range.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All types of study designs with full-text availability, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, case reports, and systematic reviews, were considered for inclusion. Included studies were fully accessible in English and focused on the topic of interest. Exclusions were made for studies addressing cervical elongation not pertinent to pelvic organ prolapse, and publications such as secondary analyses, case reports, literature reviews, and opinion papers.

RESULTS

Out of 108 relevant studies, only 63 defined their inclusion criteria; of these, 57 were utilized for the narrative review and 8 were used in a meta-analysis comparing the Manchester operation with vaginal hysterectomy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging offers the highest sensitivity in measuring cervical elongation, its practical limitations and high cost necessitate the use of the more feasible Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q), particularly effective for stage 2 and 3 prolapse cases. The POP-Q point C emerges as a pivotal marker for identifying cervical elongation, with specific measurements indicating the condition's presence. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure presents a viable management option for isolated cervical elongation, showing fewer complications and comparable recurrence rates to vaginal hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the diagnostic and definitional diversity of cervical elongation within populations experiencing pelvic organ prolapse. It emphasizes the critical role of preoperative cervical evaluation, particularly in patients with uterine descensus for selecting the most appropriate surgical intervention.

Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Vaginal vault prolapse is one of the main reasons for reoperation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Effective correction of the vaginal apex is essential for lasting repair for these women. Apical suspension of the sacrospinous ligament is probably one of the main vaginal treatments still offered to patients today. We proposed an evaluation of the functional and anatomical results of long-term sacrospinous ligament fixation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year results of sacrospinous ligament suspension as primary repair for apical prolapse and to evaluate long-term side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed 10-year follow-up after prolapse repair using sacrospinous ligament suspension. A subjective recurrence was identified as the postoperative occurrence of swelling symptoms based on a particular item on the Italian Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. An objective recurrence was defined as a postoperative decline to stage II or below in any compartment based on the POP-Q system or the requirement for additional surgery. The assessment of postoperative subjective satisfaction was conducted using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation. Objective recurrence was remarkably high, as it was observed in 17 (56.7%) patients. Subjective recurrence was reported by ten (33.3%) women, and reintervention occurred in two (6.7%) of patients. From the point of view of quality of life, according to the PGI-I, twenty-three (76.7%) patients described some degree of improvement after surgery, four (13.3%) described their status as unmodified, and three (10%) reported some form of worsening after primary treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal repair with sacrospinous fixation is a long-lasting option for prolapse repair, with improvement in every POP-q parameter. Some degree of anterior recurrence, recurrence of symptoms with swelling, or an overall worsening of quality of life after surgery is possible.

Intraoperative Fluorescent Ureter Visualization for Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of ureteral navigation using intra-ureteric indocyanine green (ICG) and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging during transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for prolapse repair to reduce the risk of iatrogenic ureteral injury.

METHODS

A cystoscope was inserted into the bladder, the tip of a 6-F open-end ureteral catheter was inserted into the ureteral orifices, and ICG was instilled into the ureters. The ureteral path was then clearly identified using NIRF imaging. Sutures were safely placed in the uterosacral ligaments at the level of the ischial spine, taking advantage of direct ureteral visualization.

RESULTS

At the end of the procedure, diagnostic cystoscopy was performed to confirm ureteral patency. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-ureteric ICG-NIRF imaging represents a simple, inexpensive, and reproducible trick for intraoperative ureteral detection, and could reassure surgeons during difficult operations, for instance, in the case of severe prolapse and/or when ureteral course abnormalities are expected.

Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous reviews on hysterectomy versus uterine-sparing surgery in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair did not consider that the open abdominal approach or transvaginal mesh use have been largely abandoned.

OBJECTIVES

To provide up-to-date evidence by examining only studies investigating techniques currently in use for POP repair.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized and non-randomized studies comparing surgical procedures for POP with or without concomitant hysterectomy. Studies describing open abdominal approaches or transvaginal mesh implantation were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A random effect meta-analysis was conducted on extracted data reporting pooled mean differences and odds ratios (OR) between groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included. Hysterectomy and uterine-sparing procedures did not differ in reoperation rate (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.74-1.17), intraoperative major (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.79-2.26) and minor (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.79-2.4) complications, postoperative major (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.85-2.37) and minor (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.9-1.53) complications, and objective (OR 1.38; 95% CI 0.92-2.07) or subjective (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.8-1.88) success. Uterine preservation was associated with a shorter operative time (-22.7 min; 95% CI -16.92 to -28.51 min), shorter hospital stay (-0.35 days, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.65 days), and less blood loss (-61.7 mL; 95% CI -31.3 to -92.1 mL). When only studies using a laparoscopic approach for both arms were considered, no differences were observed in investigated outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No major differences were observed in POP outcomes between procedures with and without concomitant hysterectomy. The decision to preserve or remove the uterus should be tailored on individual factors.

Impact of Mannitol Bladder Distension in the Intraoperative Detection of Ureteral Kinking During Pelvic Floor Surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Ureteral injuries are the most feared complications of gynecological surgery and therefore intraoperative recognition is of the utmost importance. Intraoperative cystoscopy represents the diagnostics of choice to investigate ureteral patency thanks to the direct visualization of ureteral flows after administration of infusion mediums. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of saline versus mannitol intraoperative cystoscopy in terms of false negatives in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and high uterosacral ligament suspension for POP. Patients were divided in two groups based on the use of saline or mannitol medium for intraoperative cystoscopy. Postoperative daily control of serum creatinine was performed until discharge, as well as urinary tract imaging, in symptomatic patients.

RESULTS

A total of 925 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy followed by high USL suspension for POP. Saline and mannitol medium were used in 545 patients and 380 patients respectively. Postoperative ureteral injuries were identified in 12 patients, specifically in 2% of the saline group and in 0.3% of the mannitol group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mannitol instead of saline as a bladder distension medium was able to significantly reduce the occurrence of postoperative ureteral sequelae.

High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair

Background and Objectives: Uterosacral ligaments (USLs) suspension is a well-studied, safe, and long-lasting technique for central compartment correction. Preliminary clinical experiences showed encouraging data for this technique, also for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse surgical treatment. However, up-to-date evidence for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair through high uterosacral ligaments suspension is limited. Consequently, with this study, we aimed to assess the efficiency, complications frequency, and functional results of native-tissue repair through USLs in vaginal vault prolapse. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study. Women with symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse (≥stage 2) who underwent surgery with transvaginal native-tissue repair by high uterosacral ligaments were included. Patient characteristics, preoperative assessment, operative data, postoperative follow-up visits, and re-interventions were collected from the hospital's record files. High uterosacral ligament suspension was performed according to the technique previously described by Shull. A transverse apical colpotomy at the level of the post-hysterectomy scar was performed in order to enter the peritoneal cavity. USLs were identified and transfixed from ventral to dorsal with three absorbable sutures. Sutures were then passed through the vaginal apex and tightened to close the transverse colpotomy and suspend the vaginal cuff. At the end of the surgical time, a diagnostic cystoscopy was performed in order to evaluate ureteral bilateral patency. Using the POP-Q classification system, we considered an objective recurrence as the descensus of at least one compartment ≥ II stage, or the need for a subsequent surgery for POP. The complaint of bulging symptoms was considered the item to define a subjective recurrence. We employed PGI-I scores to assess patients' satisfaction. Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients corresponding to the given period were analyzed. No intraoperative complications were observed. We observed one postoperative hematoma that required surgical evacuation. Thirty-three patients completed a minimum of one-year follow-up (mean follow-up 21.7 ± 14.6 months). Objective cure rate was observed in 25 patients (75.8%). No patients required reintervention. The most frequent site of recurrence was the anterior compartment (21.2%), while apical compartment prolapse relapsed only in 6% of patients. An improvement in all POP-Q parameters was recorded except TVL which resulted in a mean 0.5 cm shorter. Subjective recurrence was referred by 4 (12.1%) patients. The mean satisfaction assessed by PGI-I score was 1.6 ± 0.8. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that native-tissue repair through high USL suspension is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Objective, subjective, functional, and quality of life outcomes were satisfactory, with minimal complications.

Intraoperative ultrasound assessment of ureteral patency after uterosacral ligaments apical suspension for prolapse surgical repair: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare power Doppler ultrasound diagnostic performance with reference standard cystoscopy in evaluating ureteral patency in a population at high risk of ureteral lesions.

METHODS

We analyzed 100 women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse repair. All ultrasound scans were obtained, at the end of the procedures, before cystoscopic evaluation. Bilateral simultaneous ureteral jet evaluation with power Doppler was performed at the level of the ureterovesical junctions with a pulse repetition frequency set to detect low flow for a maximum of 3 min.

RESULTS

According to the reference standard urethrocystoscopy, at least one ureter not ejaculating was observed in 6% of patients, for a total of seven ureters jets not visualized. No false-negative results were obtained. Ultrasound with power Doppler showed 100% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity in detecting the lack of ureteral jet. The negative predictive value was 100%, and the positive predictive value was 46.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound with power Doppler represents an effective and reliable non-invasive screening test to exclude ureteral kinking and reduce the need for intraoperative cystoscopy.

Italian validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The use of validated Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires is useful in the standardization and interpretation process of pelvic floor patient symptoms, due to their functional nature and high prevalence. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory QoL questionnaire (PFDI-20) serves both as a symptom inventory and a measure of the degree of bother and distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms. It includes items related to pelvic organ prolapse and lower gastrointestinal and bladder dysfunction.

METHODS

After consensus translation and a comprehension test, the Italian version of the questionnaire was submitted to patients reporting bowel, bladder, or pelvic disorders (cases) and to asymptomatic women (controls). Cases received the questionnaire once again 2 weeks later by email.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients answered the questionnaire. Construct validity was demonstrated by discriminating between cases and controls. Convergent validity was demonstrated for each domain (F < 0.001). In-ernal consistency reliability showed a satisfactory range (0.816-0.860).

CONCLUSIONS

The PFDI-20 allows a comprehensive assessment of the effect of pelvic floor disorders on the quality of life of women. Moreover, the PFDI-20 represents a very solid QoL tool, since it has been extensively used in literature, and its use is highly recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence. The present study demonstrated good features for the Italian version of the PFDI-20 questionnaire.

A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This systematic review (PROSPERO:CRD42022275789) is aimed at comparing qualitatively the success, recurrence, and complication rates of sacrocolpopexy with concomitant hysterectomy, hysteropexy, sacrospinous fixation (SSF) with and without vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and uterosacral fixation (USF) with and without VH.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies published from 2011, on women with apical pelvic organ prolapse requiring surgical interventions. Risk of bias was assessed via the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. The primary outcomes are the success and recurrence rate of each technique, for ≥12 months' follow-up. Findings were summarised qualitatively.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included. Overall significant findings for a high success and low recurrence rate are summarised as: minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) is superior to abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC); sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) is superior to USF + VH, which is superior to uterosacral hysteropexy and mesh hysteropexy (MHP). Significant findings related to complications include: MISC recorded a lower overall complication rate than ASC except in mesh exposure; USF + VH tends to perform better than SSHP and SSF, with SSHP performing better than MHP in faecal incontinence and overactive bladder rates.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to conclude that hysterectomy is superior to uterine-sparing approaches. MISC should be considered over ASC given similar efficacy and reduced complications. Superiority of MHP is unproven against native tissue hysteropexy. Further studies under standardised settings are required for direct comparisons between the surgical management methods.

Hysteropexy and Anterior Vaginal Native Tissue Repair in Women with Anterior and Central Compartment Prolapse: A Long Term Follow-Up

Although it is known that hysterectomy (HY) alone cannot resolve apical prolapse, vaginal hysterectomy (VH) remains the most common surgical procedure for this issue. In recent years, various procedures for uterine conservation have been proposed to avoid the surgical risks of HY. Furthermore, most women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) prefer uterine conservation in the absence of considerable benefit in uterine removal. In 2017, we proposed a new technique for hysteropexy and anterior vaginal native tissue repair (NTR) in women with cystocele and apical prolapse. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of this new procedure after at least 5 years of follow-up. We included only patients with stage II or greater prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall and a concomitant stage II uterine prolapse in accordance with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. A Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score ≤ 2 in addition with the absence of POP symptoms was defined as subjective success. A descensus with a maximum point of less than −1 in any compartment was considered objective cure. A total of 102 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled. At 60 months follow-up, 90 out of 102 patients (88%) were subjectively cured, whereas 88 out of the 102 (86%) patients were objectively cured. Subjective and objective cure rates persisted during the entire study period. Uni- and multivariate analysis of possible predictive factors associated with recurrence of prolapse showed that only a preoperative point C > 0 cm and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 were risk factors for failure. In conclusion, our study showed that hysteropexy with anterior vaginal native tissue repair may be an effective and safe option for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse and concomitant stage II uterine prolapse by at least 5 years of follow-up.

Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse

AIM

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the Manchester procedure (MP) with or without concomitant high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) for treating uterine prolapse. The primary outcomes were to compare the two methods for differences in perioperative complications and recurrence rates, and to explore whether MP combined with concomitant HUSLS is beneficial in reducing recurrence rates.

METHODS

A total of 98 uterine prolapse patients underwent MP or MP-HUSLS during the study period. Demographic data, perioperative, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to explore the effect of surgical methods on recurrence.

RESULTS

The MP-HUSLS group had a higher degree of apical compartment prolapse before the operation, but the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) values of points Ba and C in the MP-HUSLS group improved significantly compared with the MP group (p < 0.05). The operation time in the MP group was shorter than that in the MP-HUSLS group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or perioperative complications between the two groups. Twelve patients had subjective recurrence during follow-up, although 20 developed anatomical recurrence. After controlling for confounding factors, the MP group had a higher risk of recurrence in the anterior compartment than the MP-HUSLS (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.191, confidence interval: 1.195-14.701, p = 0.025). There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of the two groups' total, apical, and posterior compartments.

CONCLUSION

Compared with MP, MP-HUSLS seems more effective in treating uterine prolapse, with a higher location of the points C and Ba. However, further studies with large samples and long follow-up times need to confirm this result.

Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Vaginal hysteropexy can be performed via the uterosacral or the sacrospinous ligament(s), but little data exist comparing these routes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare prolapse recurrence, retreatment, and symptoms along with the incidence of adverse events between patients undergoing vaginal uterosacral hysteropexy and sacrospinous hysteropexy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vaginal uterosacral or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) between 2015 and 2019. Anatomic failure was the primary outcome, defined as prolapse beyond the hymen. Composite failure was defined as anatomic failure, bulge symptoms, and/or retreatment for prolapse.

RESULTS

At 4 geographically diverse referral centers, 147 patients underwent SSHP and 114 underwent uterosacral hysteropexy. The 1-year follow-up rate was 32% (83/261) with no difference between groups. There were 10 (3.8%) anatomic failures: 3 (2%) sacrospinous and 7 (6.1%) uterosacral (P = 0.109). There was no difference in bulge symptoms (9.9%), composite failure (13%), or median prolapse stage (2).The overall incidence of complications was low (7%; 95% confidence interval, 4.12%-10.43%) with a higher rate of ureteral kinking in the uterosacral group (7% vs 1.4%, P = 0.023). With a median follow-up of 17 months, 4.6% underwent subsequent hysterectomy and 6.5% had treatment for uterine/cervical pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

One year after hysteropexy, 1 in 3 patients were available for follow-up, and there were no differences in prolapse recurrence between patients who underwent uterosacral hysteropexy versus SSHP. The incidence of adverse events was low, and less than 5% of patients underwent subsequent hysterectomy for prolapse.

Analysis on Effects of Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy Combined with High Hysterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment for Uterine Prolapse

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic total hysterectomy combined with high hysterosacral ligament suspension on the treatment for uterine prolapse.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with uterine prolapse treated in our two hospitals from January 2019 to December 2021 were included in this study, which were divided into two groups through the number double-blind method, with 50 patients in each group. The control group was treated with transvaginal total hysterectomy, and the research group was treated with laparoscopic total hysterectomy combined with high hysterosacral ligament suspension. The surgical effect on patients was evaluated through the pelvic organ prolapse quantification method (POP-Q). The patients' adverse reactions were compared. The quality of sexual life was evaluated with the short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-31). And, the patients' quality of life was also evaluated with the pelvic floor distress inventory-short form 20 (PFDl-20).

Results

The surgical effect on the control group and the research group was 80.00% and 96.00%, respectively, with statistical significance (X 2 = 6.601, P < 0.001). The incidences of adverse reactions of the two groups were 4.00% and 6.00%, respectively, which were comparable (X 2 = 0.211, P =  0.646). The total PISQ-31 scores before surgery of the control group (97.07 ± 9.80) and the research group (97.02 ± 9.80) were comparable (t = 0.020, P = 0.984), and those after surgery were 112.55 ± 13.78 in the control group and 130.80 ± 17.42 in the research group, respectively, with statistical significance (t = 4.500, P < 0.001). And, the total PFDl-20 scores before surgery of the control group (72.50 ± 13.58) and the research group (72.50 ± 13.60) were comparable (t = 0.057, P = 0.098), and that after surgery were 56.10 ± 10.51 in the control group and 42.30 ± 8.05 in the research group, respectively, with statistical significance (t = 5.709, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic total hysterectomy combined with high hysterosacral ligament suspension has an ideal effect in patients with uterine prolapse, with few adverse reactions, effectively promoting the improvement of the quality of patients' sexual life and their life. This combination has the significance of active promotion in the clinic.

Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse

Introduction and hypothesis

There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy (SSLH).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women who underwent transvaginal uterine-preserving POP surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. Patients were included if they underwent either USLH or SSLH. POP recurrence was defined as a composite of subjective symptoms and/or retreatment. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess pelvic floor symptoms and patient satisfaction.

Results

A total of 47 women met the criteria. Mean age was 52.8 ± 12.5 years, and all had a preoperative POP-Q stage of 2 (55.3%) or 3 (44.7%). Thirty (63.8%) underwent SSLH and 17 (36.2%) underwent USLH. There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative data. There was no difference in composite recurrence (26.7% [8] vs 23.5% [4]) and retreatment (6.7% [2] vs 0%) retrospectively between SSLH and USLH groups at 22.6 months. Survey response rate was 80.9% (38) with a response time of 30.7 (28.0–36.6) months. The majority of patients (84.2%) reported POP symptom improvement, and both groups reported great satisfaction (89.5%). In respondents, 13.2% (5) reported subjective recurrence and 5.3% (2) underwent retreatment, with no differences between hysteropexy types. There were no differences in other pelvic floor symptoms.

Conclusions

Although 1 in 4 women experienced subjective POP recurrence after transvaginal uterine-preserving prolapse repair and <5% underwent retreatment at 2 years, our results must be interpreted with caution given our small sample size. No differences in outcomes were identified between hysteropexy types; however, additional studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Both hysteropexy approaches were associated with great patient satisfaction.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-021-04987-5

Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate vaginal hysterectomy (VH) associated with vaginal native tissue repair (VNTR) using Campbell uterosacral ligament suspension (C-USLS) for the treatment of predominant uterine prolapse associated with cystocele.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including patients who underwent VH and C-USLS, without concomitant mesh, for primary urogenital prolapse between January 2011 and June 2018. We evaluated the anterior and apical prolapse recurrence rate, using a composite criterion (symptomatic, asymptomatic recurrence, POP-Q stage ≥ 2). We analyzed 2-year recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual satisfaction.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included. Eighty-three (88.3%) and 65 (69.1%) patients had stage ≥ 3 uterine prolapse and cystocele, respectively. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Prolapse recurrence rate was 21.3% including 3.2% of cystocele. Two-year recurrence-free survival was 80%. Age, body mass index, POP-Q stage and associated surgical procedure were not significantly associated with recurrence. Early complications were reported for 20 patients (21.2%), mostly grade ≤ 2 (95%). De novo LUTS were reported in 11 cases (11.7%). Preoperative stress urinary incontinence and urgency were cured for 12 (80%) and 29 (80.6%) patients, respectively. Sexual satisfaction rate for patients with preoperative sexual activity was 95.8%.

CONCLUSION

C-USLS following VH as primary treatment for predominant uterine prolapse with associated cystocele is a safe procedure with satisfying mid-term functional results. This VNTR could be an alternative in light of the worldwide market withdrawal of actual vaginal mesh.

Update in fertility-sparing native-tissue procedures for pelvic organ prolapse

Uterine-sparing prolapse surgery has been gaining back popularity with clinicians and patients. Although both prosthetic and native-tissue surgery procedures are described, the latter is progressively regaining a central role in pelvic reconstructive surgery, owing to a lack of mesh-related complications. Available native-tissue procedures have different advantages and pitfalls, as well as different evidence profiles. Most of them offer anatomical and subjective outcomes comparable with those of hysterectomy-based procedures. Moreover, native-tissue procedures in young women desiring childbearing allow to avoid synthetic material implantation, which may lead to potentially serious complications during pregnancy. As a consequence, we do think that offering a reconstructive native-tissue procedure for uterine preservation (with the exception of the Manchester procedure) is the safest option in women wishing for pregnancy. Sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy and high uterosacral ligament hysteropexy may be considered first-line options in consideration of the higher level of evidence and lack of adverse obstetrical outcomes.

Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?

AIMS

The aims of this study were to compare surgical results and suture-related complications after uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) with absorbable suture (AS) vs permanent suture (PS).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, clinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles that compared AS with PS for USLS. The primary outcomes were surgical success rate and suture-related complications (suture exposure/erosion and suture removal). Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was applied to conduct all analyses.

RESULTS

Four articles involving 647 patients were eventually included. Our findings demonstrated that AS had a similar surgical success rates in comparison with PS (RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06) and that no significant differences in anatomic failure rates were noted between two groups (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.65-1.86). Subgroup analyses in anatomic failure revealed no statistical differences in apical prolapse ≥1/2 TVL (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.48-1.75), recurrent prolapse beyond the hymen (RR = 1.18; 95% CI, 0.68-2.04), as well as in recurrent anterior, posterior or apical prolapse (P = .14, P = .08, P = .09, respectively). However, AS group indicated a lower risk in suture exposure/erosion (RR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.63) and lower suture removal rate (RR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to similar surgical results, less suture exposure/erosion and less suture removal, the current data supported that AS is as effective as PS, but with a better safety profile.

Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair

The lifetime risk of women for undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is estimated to be 11-19%, and 30% of these women will require subsequent reoperation over time. Following hysterectomy, 3.6 per 1,000 person-years need surgical correction of prolapse, and in two-thirds of these cases multi-compartment prolapse is present. In the last decades, vaginally synthetic meshes were widely used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. However, after the decision of the Food and Drug Administration in 2019 to stop selling all surgical mesh devices for transvaginal prolapse repair, native tissue (NT) vaginal repair seems to regain an important role in pelvic reconstructive surgery. In the literature, various surgical techniques have been described for apical repair, but the best surgical approach is still to be proven. This paper analyzes the current evidence from recent literature on NT vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) repair, with special focus on the safety and efficacy of the various vaginal techniques.