Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women

Integrating post-fracture care into the primary care setting (interFRACT): Protocol for a mixed-methods study to co-design a care program to improve rates of osteoporosis and fracture treatment

INTRODUCTION

Despite evidence showing that timely diagnosis and appropriate pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis reduces subsequent fracture rates, osteoporosis remains significantly underdiagnosed and undertreated. The large and ongoing treatment gap for osteoporosis and associated fragility fractures could be addressed by considering systematic approaches for post-fracture care in the primary care setting. This study will develop the Integrating Post-Fracture Care into Primary Care (interFRACT) care program that aims to enhance diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and improve initiation and adherence to fracture prevention strategies for older adults in the primary care setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This mixed-methods study will follow an established co-design approach that involves six steps; the first three aim to gain an understanding of the consumer experience and needs, while the latter three focus on how to improve that experience through design and action. This will include: development of a Stakeholder Advisory Committee to provide guidance on all aspects of study design, including implementation, evaluation and dissemination; interviews with primary care physicians to explore beliefs and attitudes towards osteoporosis and fracture treatment; interviews with consumers (older adults with a diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or fragility fracture) to identify current needs for osteoporosis treatment and fracture prevention; a series of co-design workshops to develop the components of the interFRACT care program based on published guidance and findings from interviews; and a feasibility study with primary care physicians to determine the usability and acceptability of the interFRACT care program.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: HEAG-H 56_2022). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international conferences, and collated in reports for participating primary care practices.

The osteoporosis treatment gap in Switzerland between 1998 and 2018

The annual number of patients treated for osteoporosis between 1998 and 2018 in Switzerland increased until 2008 and steadily decreased thereafter. With a continuously growing population at fracture risk exceeding an intervention threshold, the treatment gap has increased and the incidence of hip fractures has stopped declining in the past decade.

INTRODUCTION

The existence of an osteoporosis treatment gap, defined as the percentage of patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures exceeding an intervention threshold but remaining untreated, is widely acknowledged. Between 1998 and 2018, new bone active substances (BAS) indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis became available. Whether and if so to what extent these new introductions have altered the treatment gap is unknown.

METHODS

The annual number of patients treated with a BAS was calculated starting from single-drug unit sales. The number of patients theoretically eligible for treatment with a BAS was estimated based on four scenarios corresponding to different intervention thresholds (one based solely on a bone mineral density T score threshold and three FRAX-based thresholds) and the resulting annual treatment gaps were calculated.

RESULTS

In Switzerland, the estimated number of patients on treatment with a BAS increased from 35,901 in year 1998 to 233,381 in year 2018. However, this number grew regularly since 1998, peaked in 2008, and steadily decreased thereafter, in timely coincidence with the launch of intravenous bisphosphonates and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab. When expressed in numbers of untreated persons at risk for osteoporotic fractures exceeding a given intervention threshold, the treatment gaps were of similar magnitude in 1998 (when the first BSAs just had become available) and 2018. There was a strong association, which does not imply causation, between the proportion of patients treated and hip fracture incidence.

CONCLUSION

In Switzerland, the osteoporosis treatment gap has increased over the past decade. The availability of new BAS has not contributed to its decrease.

Association between Outpatient Visits and Initiating Medication among Elderly Patients after an Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Purpose: A treatment gap exists in vertebral fracture (VF) patients. An outpatient visit is a necessary step to initiate treatment. The study aimed to evaluate factors associated with an outpatient visit following a VF diagnosis, and the association between the interval of an outpatient visit after VF diagnosis and its impact on prescribing of anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs). Methods: Subjects 65 years and older from Tianliao Township in Taiwan with newly diagnosed VF between 2009 and 2010 were included. Information about outpatient visits and AOMs prescriptions were derived from the National Health Insurance Research database and followed up for 2 years. Factors associated with outpatient visits and the initiation of AOMs were assessed using the multivariable Cox proportional regression model analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was analyzed to determine the predictive effects of the interval between an outpatient visit following the diagnosis of a new VF on initiating AOMs and the potential optimal cutoff point. Results: Of 393 participants, 42.2% had outpatient visits within 2 years after a new VF diagnosis, for which the mean interval was 4.8 ± 4.8 months. Patients who were female and reported a current use of supplements were positively associated with visits after a new VF diagnosis, but the bone mineral density (BMD) T-score was negatively associated with visits. Furthermore, 140 (35.6%) patients had initiated AOMs within 2 years after the diagnosis of a new VF. It was found that a higher BMD T-score and a longer interval between an outpatient visit following diagnosis was negatively associated with initiation of AOMs. The ROC curve analysis showed outpatient visits within 3 months after a VF diagnosis had the highest Youden index and maximum area under the curve. Conclusions: Patients who were female, were currently taking supplements, and those who had a lower BMD T-score were more likely to visit doctors after being diagnosed with a new VF. Furthermore, a lower BMD T-score and a shorter interval, within 3 months and not more than 8 months, between an outpatient visit following the diagnosis of VF increased the likelihood of being prescribed AOMs.

Medical management patterns in a US commercial claims database following a nontraumatic fracture in postmenopausal women

Among women ≥ 50 years with fracture, 76% had not received osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment at 6 months and only 14% underwent a DXA scan. Nearly half of all and 90% of hip fracture patients required surgery. Fractures cause substantial clinical burden and are not linked to osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis (OP) and OP-related fractures are a major public health concern, associated with significant economic burden. This study describes management patterns following a nontraumatic fracture for commercially insured patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified women aged ≥ 50 years having their first nontraumatic index fracture (IF) between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2019, from IQVIA's PharMetrics® Plus claims database. Medical management patterns at month 6 and medication use patterns at months 6, 12, and 24 following the IF were described.

RESULTS

Among 48,939 women (mean (SD) age: 62.7 (9.5) years), the most common fracture types were vertebral (30.6%), radius/ulna (24.9%), and hip (HF; 12.1%). By month 6, 76% of patients had not received an OP diagnosis or treatment, 13.6% underwent a DXA scan, and 11.2% received any OP treatment. Surgery was required in 43.1% of all patients and 90.0% of HF patients on or within 6 months of the fracture date. Among HF patients, 41.4% were admitted to a skilled nursing facility, 96.7% were hospitalized an average of 5.5 days, and 38.1% required durable medical equipment use. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was 14.3% among those hospitalized for the IF. Overall, 7.4%, 9.9%, and 13.2% had a subsequent fracture at months 6, 12, and 24, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide an overview of post-fracture management patterns using real-world data. OP was remarkably underdiagnosed and undertreated following the initial fracture. Nontraumatic fracture, particularly HF, resulted in substantial ongoing clinical burden.

Overview of fracture liaison services in the UK and Europe: standards, model of care, funding, and challenges

Fragility fractures represent a growing global problem, including in the United Kingdom and European countries. Reports demonstrate the benefits of national guidance and organized fragility fracture programs through fracture liaison services to deliver care to patients who sustain these injuries. The challenge of assembling multidisciplinary teams, providing routine screening of appropriate patients, and monitoring therapies where there is a known compliance problem, remains an obstacle to the success of fragility fracture treatment programs to all. Efforts should continue to introduce and maintain fracture liaison services through coordinated national approaches and advanced systems.

Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Development of 5-Year Prediction Models Using the FRISBEE Study

CONTEXT

Individualized fracture risk may help to select patients requiring a pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis. FRAX and the Garvan fracture risk calculators are the most used tools, although their external validation has shown significant differences in their risk prediction ability.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Using data from the Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry study, a cohort of 3560 postmenopausal women aged 60 to 85 years, we aimed to construct original 5-year fracture risk prediction models using validated clinical risk factors (CRFs). Three models of competing risk analysis were developed to predict major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), all fractures, and central fractures (femoral neck, shoulder, clinical spine, pelvis, ribs, scapula, clavicle, sternum).

RESULTS

Age, a history of fracture, and hip or spine BMD were predictors common to the 3 models. Excessive alcohol intake and the presence of comorbidities were specific additional CRFs for MOFs, a history of fall for all fractures, and rheumatoid arthritis for central fractures. Our models predicted the fracture probability at 5 years with an acceptable accuracy (Brier scores ≤ 0.1) and had a good discrimination power (area under the receiver operating curve of 0.73 for MOFs and 0.72 for central fractures) when internally validated by bootstrap. Three simple nomograms, integrating significant CRFs and the mortality risk, were constructed for different fracture sites. In conclusion, we derived 3 models predicting fractures with an acceptable accuracy, particularly for MOFs and central fractures. The models are based on a limited number of CRFs, and we constructed nomograms for use in clinical practice.

Lipopolysaccharide-Induced lncRNA TMC3-AS1 is Highly Expressed in Osteoporosis and Promotes Osteoblast Apoptosis by Suppressing the Formation of Mature miR-708

Background

LncRNA TMC3-AS1 expression is affected by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a contributor to osteoporosis (OS). Therefore, we hypothesized that TMC3-AS1 could inhibit osteoblast apoptosis and interact with miR-708, a regulator of osteoblast apoptosis in OS.

Methods

Differential expression of TMC3-AS1 and miR-708 (mature and premature) in OS patients and controls was analyzed using RT-qPCR. Subcellular location of TMC3-AS1 in osteoblasts was analyzed using subcellular fractionation assay. The direct interaction between TMC3-AS1 and premature miR-708 was analyzed using RNA pulldown assay. The role of TMC3-AS1 and miR-708 in the expression of each other was explored with overexpression assays. Cell apoptosis induced by LPS was analyzed using cell apoptosis assay.

Results

TMC3-AS1 and premature miR-708 were highly expressed in OS and were upregulated by LPS in osteoblasts. In contrast, mature miR-708 was under-expressed in OS and downregulated by LPS. TMC3-AS1 directly interacted with premature miR-708 and was detected in both the nuclear and cytoplasm fractions. TMC3-AS1 decreased premature miR-708 level and increased mature miR-708 level. Moreover, TMC3-AS1 increased LPS-induced cell apoptosis and suppressed the role of miR-708 in cell apoptosis.

Conclusion

TMC3-AS1 is highly expressed in OS and promotes LPS-induced osteoblast apoptosis by reducing miR-708 maturation.

Impact of non-hip fractures in elderly women: a narrative review

The association of hip fractures with adverse outcomes is well established, but for non-hip fractures this association still needs to be further investigated. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the state of the art with regards to the health impact of clinically relevant non-hip fracture locations in postmenopausal women. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from January 2010 until December 2020. Studies were included when the crude rates and/or relative risk of 1-year subsequent fractures and/or mortality were reported as well as the precise fracture site. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Regarding mortality rates, there was a high variability between studies, with higher rates for vertebral, proximal humerus and pelvic fractures. There was a small or no impact of wrist, ankle or tibia fractures. The mortality rate increased with age after vertebral, proximal humerus and wrist fractures. Moreover, proximal humerus and vertebral fractures were associated with a higher mortality risk. This narrative review indicates that, besides fractures of the hip, fractures of the vertebrae, proximal humerus or pelvis deserve more attention when trying to prevent adverse outcomes of osteoporosis. More studies on the topic of non-hip fractures are urgently needed.

Insufficient increase in bone mineral density testing rates and pharmacotherapy after hip and vertebral fracture: analysis of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan

Test and treatment rates for osteoporosis in Japan aimed at preventing secondary fragility fractures were insufficient. Those who suffered hip fractures had approximately half the rates of those who suffered vertebral fractures, with such rates being lower among those over 80 years old and males.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to examine the care gap for secondary fracture prevention in Japan given the few large-scale studies regarding the matter.

METHODS

Changes in bone mineral density testing (test rate) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy administration (treatment rate) rates before and after hip and vertebral fracture registration were examined using medical insurance data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan issued from April 2012 to March 2019.

RESULTS

The hip fracture group comprised 677,480 women and 264,003 men, the vertebral fracture group comprised 703,247 women and 251,542 men, and the mixed fracture group comprised 3614 women and 1055 men. Test rates were 14.1%, 25.3%, and 17.6% prior to fracture registration (pre-registration) and 22.3%, 43.6%, and 28.1% after fracture registration (post-registration) in the hip, vertebral, and mixed fracture groups, respectively. Moreover, pre-registration treatment rates were 21.2%, 33.5%, and 30.7%, while post-registration rates were 31.6%, 61.7%, and 46.6% in the hip, vertebral, and mixed fracture groups, respectively. All fracture groups showed a tendency for decreased post-registration test and treatment rates among those aged over 80 years old, with men having lower rates. Moreover, 184,180 (19.4% of whom received new treatment) and 707,263 (23.8% of whom received new treatment) patients with and without polypharmacy underwent treatment after registration, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To bridge the care gap following fractures, medical professionals should change their perception regarding osteoporosis treatment in patients with hip fractures, elderly individuals undergoing polypharmacy, and males.

Which treatment to prevent an imminent fracture?

Purpose

To provide a summarized state of the art of the relative efficacy and rapidity of action of pharmacological treatments to prevent imminent osteoporotic fractures.

Methods

We reviewed metanalyses (MA) and network metaanalyses (NMA) published during the last 10 years concerning the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. We compared the anti-fracture efficacy and the rapidity of action of various agents versus placebo and versus risedronate.

Results

All bisphosphonates decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures compared with placebo. Ibandronate is the only one without demonstrated efficacy against non-vertebral and hip fractures. Zoledronate, denosumab and anabolic therapy are associated with a higher fracture risk reduction than oral bisphosphonates. Compared with risedronate, which significantly reduces the rate of hip fractures, zoledronate, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab are more efficient for vertebral fractures but not for non-vertebral or hip fractures reduction. No studies have compared bone anabolic treatments with zoledronate or denosumab. Oral bisphosphonates significantly reduce fracture risk only after more than one year of therapy. A faster reduction of fracture risk is observed with zoledronate and denosumab, or with anabolic agents. For denosumab and anabolic agents, a sequential treatment is required to keep gains after treatment withdrawal.

Conclusions

In patients at high risk of imminent fracture, starting therapy with potent antiresorptive agents or with an anabolic agent seems most appropriate to promptly reduce the fracture risk. Available NMA/MA suggest that, compared to zoledronate and denosumab, anabolic agents have a higher efficacy for vertebral fractures but head-to-head studies are lacking.

•

The concept of imminent fracture has implications for the choice of therapy

•

We reviewed metanalyses and network metaanalyses published in the last 10 years

•

We compared the efficacy and rapidity of treatments to prevent imminent fractures

•

Potent antiresorptive and anabolic agents are most appropriate to promptly reduce fracture risk

•

Anabolic agents seem to be more efficient to reduce vertebral fracture risk

Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort

Multiple factors increase the risk of an imminent fracture, including a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and the fracture site. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate treatment.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is maximal during the first 2 years following an incident fracture. In this prospective cohort study, we looked at the incidence of recurrent fractures within 2 years after a first incident fracture and we assessed independent clinical risk factors (CRFs) increasing this imminent fracture risk.

METHODS

A total of 3560 postmenopausal women recruited from 2007 to 2013 were surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures. We identified patients who sustained a fracture during the first 2 years following a first incident fragility fracture. We quantified the risk of a new fracture and assessed independent CRFs, associated with an imminent fracture at various sites.

RESULTS

A recent fracture was a significant CRF for an imminent fracture (OR (95% CI): 3.7 (2.4-5.7) [p < 0.0001]). The incidence of an imminent fracture was higher in subjects above 80 years (p < 0.001). Other CRFs highly predictive in a multivariate analysis were osteoporosis diagnosis (p < 0.01), a central fracture as the index fracture (p < 0.01), and the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.05), with likelihood ratios of 1.9, 1.9, and 2.2, respectively. An imminent fracture was better predicted by a central fracture (p < 0.01) than by a major osteoporotic fracture. The hazard ratio was the highest for a central fracture.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a recent fracture, older age, osteoporosis, comorbidities, and fracture site were associated with an imminent fracture risk. These findings could be a first step in the development of a model to predict an imminent fracture and select patients most at need of immediate and most appropriate treatment.