Prolactinemia is uncoupled from central D2/D3 dopamine receptor occupancy in amisulpride treated patients

Sexual dysfunctions associated with antipsychotic drug intake: a retrospective analysis of the FDA adverse events reporting system (FAERS)

Sexual dysfunctions (SD) are common and debilitating side effects of antipsychotics. The current study analyzes the occurrence of antipsychotic-related SD using data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). FAERS was queried for sexual dysfunction adverse events (encoded by 35 different MedDRA preferred terms) secondary to amisulpride, aripiprazole, chlorprothixene, clozapine, haloperidol, loxapine, olanzapine, pipamperone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone from 2000 to 2023. Disproportionality signal analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). During the observation period, 9203 cases of SD were reported in association with the antipsychotic drug use. Men reported these dysfunctions more frequently (68.4% of all cases) than women. Ziprasidone had the highest ROR for sexual dysfunction in FAERS, at 84.86 ; 95 % C I ( 77.50 , 92.94 ) ) , followed by aripirazole for sexual dysfunction ( R O R = 34.17 ; 95 % C I ( 32.06 , 36.43 ) ) . In general, aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, and quetiapine had higher risk signals across multiple adverse events (AEs), whereas chlorprothixene, loxapine, and amisulpride showed lower risk signals. The pathogenesis of SD does not appear to be limited to specific pathomechanisms and therefore not to specific substances. The differing report distributions by sex and the impact of polypharmacy on the symptoms warrant further investigations.

Discovery and Model-Informed Drug Development of a Controlled-Release Formulation of Nonracemic Amisulpride that Reduces Plasma Exposure but Achieves Pharmacodynamic Bioequivalence in the Brain

Nonracemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an investigational 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride and currently in clinical trials for the treatment of bipolar depression. During testing of SEP-4199, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) disconnect was discovered that prompted the development of a controlled-release (CR) formulation with improved therapeutic index for QT prolongation. Observations that supported the development of a CR formulation included (i) plasma concentrations of amisulpride enantiomers were cleared within 24-hours, but brain dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) occupancies, although achieving stable levels during this time, required 5 days to return to baseline; (ii) nonracemic amisulpride administered to non-human primates produced significantly greater D2R occupancies during a gradual 6-hour administration compared with a single bolus; (iii) concentration-occupancy curves were left-shifted in humans when nonracemic amisulpride was gradually administered over 3 and 6 hours compared with immediate delivery; (iv) CR solid oral dose formulations of nonracemic amisulpride were able to slow drug dissolution in vitro and reduce peak plasma exposures in vivo in human subjects. By mathematically solving for a drug distribution step into an effect compartment, and for binding to target receptors, the discovery of a novel PK/PD model (termed here as Distribution Model) accounted for hysteresis between plasma and brain, a lack of receptor saturation, and an absence of accumulation of drug occupancy with daily doses. The PK/PD disconnect solved by the Distribution Model provided model-informed drug development to continue in Phase III using the non-bioequivalent CR formulation with diminished QT prolongation as dose-equivalent to the immediate release (IR) formulation utilized in Phase II.

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Nicotine Reward and Aversion

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) regulate the rewarding actions of nicotine contained in tobacco that establish and maintain the smoking habit. nAChRs also regulate the aversive properties of nicotine, sensitivity to which decreases tobacco use and protects against tobacco use disorder. These opposing behavioral actions of nicotine reflect nAChR expression in brain reward and aversion circuits. nAChRs containing α4 and β2 subunits are responsible for the high-affinity nicotine binding sites in the brain and are densely expressed by reward-relevant neurons, most notably dopaminergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. High-affinity nAChRs can incorporate additional subunits, including β3, α6, or α5 subunits, with the resulting nAChR subtypes playing discrete and dissociable roles in the stimulatory actions of nicotine on brain dopamine transmission. nAChRs in brain dopamine circuits also participate in aversive reactions to nicotine and the negative affective state experienced during nicotine withdrawal. nAChRs containing α3 and β4 subunits are responsible for the low-affinity nicotine binding sites in the brain and are enriched in brain sites involved in aversion, including the medial habenula, interpeduncular nucleus, and nucleus of the solitary tract, brain sites in which α5 nAChR subunits are also expressed. These aversion-related brain sites regulate nicotine avoidance behaviors, and genetic variation that modifies the function of nAChRs in these sites increases vulnerability to tobacco dependence and smoking-related diseases. Here, we review the molecular, cellular, and circuit-level mechanisms through which nicotine elicits reward and aversion and the adaptations in these processes that drive the development of nicotine dependence. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Tobacco use disorder in the form of habitual cigarette smoking or regular use of other tobacco-related products is a major cause of death and disease worldwide. This article reviews the actions of nicotine in the brain that contribute to tobacco use disorder.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Non-racemic Amisulpride (SEP-4199) for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression

BACKGROUND

Non-racemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride:esamisulpride with a 5-HT7 and D2 receptor binding profile optimized for the treatment of bipolar depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-4199 for the treatment of bipolar depression.

METHODS

Patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar I depression were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with SEP-4199 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d. The primary endpoint was change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 6. The primary efficacy analysis population consisted of patients in Europe and US (n = 289); the secondary efficacy analysis population (ITT; n = 337) included patients in Japan.

RESULTS

Endpoint improvement in MADRS total score was observed on both the primary analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.054; effect size [ES], 0.31) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.054; ES, 0.29), and on the secondary (full ITT) analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.016; ES, 0.34) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.024; ES, 0.31). Study completion rates were 81% on SEP-4199 200 mg/d, 88% on 400 mg/d, and 86% on placebo. SEP-4199 had low rates of individual adverse events (<8%) and minimal effects on weight and lipids; median increases in prolactin were +83.6 μg/L on 200 mg/d, +95.2 μg/L on 400 mg/d compared with 0.0 μg/L on placebo.

LIMITATIONS

The study excluded patients with bipolar II depression and serious psychiatric or medical comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Study results provide preliminary proof of concept, needing confirmation in subsequent randomized trials, for the efficacy of non-racemic amisulpride in bipolar depression.

Discovery of Nonracemic Amisulpride to Maximize Benefit/Risk of 5-HT7 and D2 Receptor Antagonism for the Treatment of Mood Disorders

In contrast to the dose‐occupancy relationship in the treatment of schizophrenia, the minimal effective level of dopamine receptor 2 (D2R) blockade for antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression is unknown. Lower doses aimed at reducing extrapyramidal side effects must be balanced against the need to retain the therapeutic benefit of D2R blockade on emergent cycling, mixed, manic, anxiety, and/or psychotic symptoms. Dose‐reductions intended to lower D2R blockade, however, could also decrease concomitant serotonin receptor antagonism and its potential benefit on depressive symptoms. Here, we uncoupled the potential antidepressant activity in amisulpride, driven by 5‐HT7 receptor (5‐HT7R) antagonism, from the D2R‐mediated antipsychotic activity by discovering that each enantiomer favors a different receptor. Aramisulpride was more potent at 5‐HT7R relative to esamisulpride (Ki 47 vs. 1,900 nM, respectively), whereas esamisulpride was more potent at D2R (4.0 vs. 140 nM). We hypothesized that a nonracemic ratio might achieve greater 5‐HT7R‐mediated antidepressant effects at a lower level of D2R blockade. The dose‐occupancy relationship of esamisulpride at D2R was determined by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in human volunteers. Separately the dose‐relationship of aramisulpride was established in humans using suppression of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep as a marker of 5‐HT7R antagonism. These results led to the discovery of an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride (SEP‐4199) that maximizes the potential for antidepressant benefit of aramisulpride via 5‐HT7R and reduces esamisulpride to minimize D2R‐related extrapyramidal side effects while still retaining D2R‐mediated effects predicted to provide benefit in bipolar depression. The antidepressant efficacy of SEP‐4199 was recently confirmed in a proof‐of‐concept trial for the treatment of bipolar depression (NCT03543410).

A systematic review and combined meta-analysis of concentration of oral amisulpride

AIMS

Amisulpride, a first-line schizophrenia treatment, has shown large interindividual variability in plasma/serum levels, often outside the reference range (100-320 ng/mL). This study aims to clarify the impact of dose, sex, age and related factors for the interpatient variability in amisulpride plasma/serum concentration.

METHODS

Both English and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to May 16, 2019, using the terms: amisulpride and (plasma OR serum OR blood OR "drug monitoring" OR concentration). Studies reporting concentrations and either a dose, associated factor, clinical outcome or side effect were included.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1628 participants were eventually included. Eligible articles yielded data on drug concentration and dose, averaging 333.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 294.5-373.3) ng/mL and 636.2 (95% CI: 549.7-722.6) mg/d, respectively. The calculated mean concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52-0.67) (ng/mL)/mg. Subgroup analysis suggested that female patients on combined lithium-amisulpride have higher concentration levels and C/D ratios. Age was slight positive associated with C/D ratio while not for plasma level. Smoker patients have high concentration level than nonsmoking patients but not for C/D. Responsive and nonresponsive groups did not differ in concentration and C/D.

CONCLUSION

Pooled concentration levels of amisulpride were higher than recommended with wide individual variation, especially in older patients, female patients and patients taking amisulpride combined with lithium. The specific therapeutic reference range for amisulpride may require reconstruction, which should consider the influence of age, sex, kidney function, drug-drug interactions, different dose regimens and sampling times in future study.

Prolactin response to antipsychotics: An inpatient study

Background

Antipsychotic medication, stress, gender, and age are factors that influence prolactin levels in patients with psychosis. The aim of the study was to investigate the level of prolactin response to antipsychotic treatment in acute patients, taking into account the total duration of psychosis.

Methods and findings

The study was conducted on 170 acute patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder. Subjects were divided into three subgroups according to the duration of the psychosis (less than 5 years, between 5 and 10 years and more than 10 years of disorder duration). The initial prolactin response under antipsychotic treatment was measured, while the severity of the psychiatric symptoms was assessed with the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale). Hyperprolactinemia was found in 120 (70.6%) patients, amongst which 80 (66.7%) were females and 40 (33.3%) were males. The average increase in prolactinemia was 2.46 times the maximum value in women, and 1.59 times in men. Gender (β = 0.27, p<0.0001), type of antipsychotic medication according to potency of inducing hyperprolactinemia (β = -0.23, p<0.003), and the duration of psychosis over 10 years (β = -0.15, p = 0.04) significantly predicted prolactin levels, when age, diagnosis, antipsychotic category (conventional/atypical/combinations of antipsychotics), and BPRS total scores were controlled for.

Conclusions and relevance

Prolactin levels in patients treated with antipsychotic medication appeared to depend on patients’ gender, on the type of antipsychotic medication according to potency of inducing hyperprolactinemia, and on the duration of the psychosis. An increase in prolactin levels was associated with female gender, while the use of prolactin sparing antipsychotics and a duration of psychosis over 10 years were associated with lower prolactin levels.

Review of serum prolactin levels as an antipsychotic-response biomarker

Antipsychotics acting as antagonists at dopamine D2 receptors concentrated in the striatum are the cornerstone of effective treatment of psychosis. Substantial progress in treating persons with schizophrenia could be achieved by the identification of biomarkers which reliably determine the lowest efficacious dose of antipsychotics. Prolactin levels have been considered a promising treatment-response biomarker due to dopamine’s regulation of serum prolactin levels through D2 receptors in the hypothalamic-pituitary pathway. Prolactin secretion in response antipsychotic administration is associated with the antipsychotics affinity for D2 receptors. This review assesses the available literature on the use of serum prolactin levels as an antipsychotic-response biomarker. Articles were identified through PubMed as well as the reference lists of full text articles available online. Relevant publications were summarized briefly to define the limitations and utility of serum prolactin levels as a tool for improving antipsychotic dosing. Serum prolactin levels in combination with prolactin-inducing potencies for each antipsychotic may help identify the lowest effective dose of antipsychotic medications. , In addition to the fact that prolactin secretion is dependent on serum antipsychotic levels and not brain levels, recent findings show that prolactin release is independent of the β-arrestin-2 pathway and GSK3β regulation, one branch of the pathway that has been implicated in antipsychotic efficacy. Therefore, serum prolactin is an indirect biomarker for treatment response. Further investigations are warranted to characterize prolactin-antipsychotic dose-response curves and systematically test the utility of measuring prolactin levels in patients to identify a person’s lowest efficacious dose.

Dopamine D2/3- and μ-opioid receptor antagonists reduce cue-induced responding and reward impulsivity in humans

Increased responding to drug-associated stimuli (cue reactivity) and an inability to tolerate delayed gratification (reward impulsivity) have been implicated in the development and maintenance of drug addiction. Whereas data from animal studies suggest that both the dopamine and opioid system are involved in these two reward-related processes, their role in humans is less clear. Moreover, dopaminergic and opioidergic drugs have not been directly compared with regard to these functions, even though a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms might inform the development of specific treatments for elevated cue reactivity and reward impulsivity. In a randomized, double-blind, between-subject design we administered the selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist amisulpride (400 mg, n=41), the unspecific opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone (50 mg, n=40) or placebo (n=40) to healthy humans and measured cue-induced responding with a Pavlovian-instrumental transfer task and reward impulsivity with a delay discounting task. Mood was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Compared with placebo, amisulpride significantly suppressed cue-induced responding and reward impulsivity. The effects of naltrexone were similar, although less pronounced. Both amisulpride and naltrexone decreased average mood ratings compared with placebo. Our results demonstrate that a selective blockade of dopamine D2/D3 receptors reduces cue-induced responding and reward impulsivity in healthy humans. Antagonizing μ-opioid receptors has similar effects for cue-induced responding and to a lesser extent for reward impulsivity.

Addiction therapy. Refining deep brain stimulation to emulate optogenetic treatment of synaptic pathology

Circuit remodeling driven by pathological forms of synaptic plasticity underlies several psychiatric diseases, including addiction. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been applied to treat a number of neurological and psychiatric conditions, although its effects are transient and mediated by largely unknown mechanisms. Recently, optogenetic protocols that restore normal transmission at identified synapses in mice have provided proof of the idea that cocaine-adaptive behavior can be reversed in vivo. The most efficient protocol relies on the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluRs, which depotentiates excitatory synaptic inputs onto dopamine D1 receptor medium-sized spiny neurons and normalizes drug-adaptive behavior. We discovered that acute low-frequency DBS, refined by selective blockade of dopamine D1 receptors, mimics optogenetic mGluR-dependent normalization of synaptic transmission. Consequently, there was a long-lasting abolishment of behavioral sensitization.

The dopamine stabilizer (-)-OSU6162 occupies a subpopulation of striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptors: an [(11)C]raclopride PET study in healthy human subjects

(-)-OSU6162 is a dopamine stabilizer that can counteract both hyperdopaminergic and hypodopaminergic states. In this study, D2/D3 receptor occupancy of (-)-OSU6162 in the human brain was investigated using positron emission tomography (PET). Twelve male healthy volunteers underwent [(11)C]raclopride PET scanning before and 1 h after a single oral dose of (-)-OSU6162 (15-90 mg). Blood samples for determination of (-)-OSU6162 and prolactin plasma levels were collected at Tmax. Parametric images of [(11)C]raclopride binding potential relative to nondisplaceable tissue (cerebellar grey matter) uptake (BPND) at baseline and after (-)-OSU6162 administration were generated using the simplified reference tissue model. MRI-based regions of interest were defined for the striatum, composed of caudate nucleus and putamen, and projected onto the co-registered parametric [(11)C]raclopride BPND image. Furthermore, three striatal subregions, ie, anterior dorsal caudate, anterior dorsal putamen, and ventral striatum, were defined manually and additionally analyzed. Plasma concentrations of (-)-OSU6162, ranging from 0.01 to 0.9 μM, showed a linear relationship with prolactin levels, reflecting blockade of pituitary D2 receptors. A concentration-dependent increase in striatal D2/D3 receptor occupancy was observed, reaching a value of about 20% at an (-)-OSU6162 plasma level of 0.2 μM, and which for higher concentrations leveled off to a maximal occupancy of about 40%. Findings were similar in the striatal subregions. The present data corroborate the notion that (-)-OSU6162 binds preferentially to a subpopulation of D2/D3 receptors, possibly predominantly extrasynaptic, and this may form the basis for the dopamine-stabilizing properties of (-)-OSU6162.

Differential modulation of reinforcement learning by D2 dopamine and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonism

The firing pattern of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is well known to reflect reward prediction errors (PEs), the difference between obtained and expected rewards. The PE is thought to be a crucial signal for instrumental learning, and interference with DA transmission impairs learning. Phasic increases of DA neuron firing during positive PEs are driven by activation of NMDA receptors, whereas phasic suppression of firing during negative PEs is likely mediated by inputs from the lateral habenula. We aimed to determine the contribution of DA D2-class and NMDA receptors to appetitively and aversively motivated reinforcement learning. Healthy human volunteers were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed an instrumental learning task under the influence of either the DA D2 receptor antagonist amisulpride (400 mg), the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine (20 mg), or placebo. Participants quickly learned to select ("approach") rewarding and to reject ("avoid") punishing options. Amisulpride impaired both approach and avoidance learning, while memantine mildly attenuated approach learning but had no effect on avoidance learning. These behavioral effects of the antagonists were paralleled by their modulation of striatal PEs. Amisulpride reduced both appetitive and aversive PEs, while memantine diminished appetitive, but not aversive PEs. These data suggest that striatal D2-class receptors contribute to both approach and avoidance learning by detecting both the phasic DA increases and decreases during appetitive and aversive PEs. NMDA receptors on the contrary appear to be required only for approach learning because phasic DA increases during positive PEs are NMDA dependent, whereas phasic decreases during negative PEs are not.

The effects of novel and newly approved antipsychotics on serum prolactin levels: a comprehensive review

Since the 1970s, clinicians have increasingly become more familiar with hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) as a common adverse effect of antipsychotic medication, which remains the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment for patients with schizophrenia. Although treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) as a group is, compared with use of the first-generation antipsychotics, associated with lower prolactin (PRL) plasma levels, the detailed effects on plasma PRL levels for each of these compounds in reports often remain incomplete or inaccurate. Moreover, at this moment, no review has been published about the effect of the newly approved antipsychotics asenapine, iloperidone and lurasidone on PRL levels. The objective of this review is to describe PRL physiology; PRL measurement; diagnosis, causes, consequences and mechanisms of HPRL; incidence figures of (new-onset) HPRL with SGAs and newly approved antipsychotics in adolescent and adult patients; and revisit lingering questions regarding this hormone. A literature search, using the MEDLINE database (1966-December 2013), was conducted to identify relevant publications to report on the state of the art of HPRL and to summarize the available evidence with respect to the propensity of the SGAs and the newly approved antipsychotics to elevate PRL levels. Our review shows that although HPRL usually is defined as a sustained level of PRL above the laboratory upper limit of normal, limit values show some degree of variability in clinical reports, making the interpretation and comparison of data across studies difficult. Moreover, many reports do not provide much or any data detailing the measurement of PRL. Although the highest rates of HPRL are consistently reported in association with amisulpride, risperidone and paliperidone, while aripiprazole and quetiapine have the most favorable profile with respect to this outcome, all SGAs can induce PRL elevations, especially at the beginning of treatment, and have the potential to cause new-onset HPRL. Considering the PRL-elevating propensity of the newly approved antipsychotics, evidence seems to indicate these agents have a PRL profile comparable to that of clozapine (asenapine and iloperidone), ziprasidone and olanzapine (lurasidone). PRL elevations with antipsychotic medication generally are dose dependant. However, antipsychotics having a high potential for PRL elevation (amisulpride, risperidone and paliperidone) can have a profound impact on PRL levels even at relatively low doses, while PRL levels with antipsychotics having a minimal effect on PRL, in most cases, can remain unchanged (quetiapine) or reduce (aripiprazole) over all dosages. Although tolerance and decreases in PRL values after long-term administration of PRL-elevating antipsychotics can occur, the elevations, in most cases, remain above the upper limit of normal. PRL profiles of antipsychotics in children and adolescents seem to be the same as in adults. The hyperprolactinemic effects of antipsychotic medication are mostly correlated with their affinity for dopamine D2 receptors at the level of the anterior pituitary lactotrophs (and probably other neurotransmitter mechanisms) and their blood-brain barrier penetrating capability. Even though antipsychotics are the most common cause of pharmacologically induced HPRL, recent research has shown that HPRL can be pre-existing in a substantial portion of antipsychotic-naïve patients with first-episode psychosis or at-risk mental state.

Osteoporosis associated with antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is one of the most common global mental diseases, with prevalence of 1%. Patients with schizophrenia are predisposed to diabetes, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and osteoporosis, than the normal. In comparison with the metabolic syndrome, for instance, there are little reports about osteoporosis which occurs secondary to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia. There are extensive recent works of literature indicating that osteoporosis is associated with schizophrenia particularly in patients under psychotropic medication therapy. As osteoporotic fractures cause significantly increased morbidity and mortality, it is quite necessary to raise the awareness and understanding of the impact of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia on physical health in schizophrenia. In this paper, we will review the relationship between schizophrenia, antipsychotic medication, hyperprolactinaemia, and osteoporosis.

Plasma amisulpride in relation to prescribed dose, clozapine augmentation, and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 2002-2010

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of dose and other factors on plasma amisulpride concentrations in clinical practice.

METHOD

Amisulpride therapeutic drug monitoring data 2002-2010 have been studied.

RESULTS

There were 296 samples (196 adult patients). Amisulpride was not detected in 10% of samples. In the remainder, the mean plasma amisulpride in relation to the prescribed dose (mg/day) was as follows: 100-200 (111 µg/L), 201-400 (254 µg/L), 400-800 (421 µg/L), and 800-1200 (494 µg/L). For prescribed doses up to 800 mg/day, only 51% of results were within 100-319 µg/L. There were no significant sex differences in mean plasma amisulpride or mean dose. The mean plasma amisulpride, but not the dose, was significantly higher in smokers. Linear regression analysis showed that dose explained only 42% of the variation in plasma amisulpride after log(10) transformation of both variables. There was no significant difference in the mean dose or mean plasma amisulpride in patients co-prescribed clozapine as compared with the remaining samples.

CONCLUSION

In practice, dose is a poor predictor of plasma amisulpride concentration. Therapeutic drug monitoring may not only help assess adherence, but also guide dosage.

Slow dissociation of partial agonists from the D₂ receptor is linked to reduced prolactin release

In this study we investigated the correlation between affinity, efficacy, peripheral receptor occupancy, and kinetic properties of D₂ dopamine receptor ligands with time-course evaluations of prolactin release in rat blood. We profiled typical and atypical antipsychotic antagonists at D₂ receptors, the partial agonist aripiprazole, and four novel partial agonist compounds with different properties. Clozapine and quetiapine revealed lower prolactin release and fast dissociation kinetics, linking fast dissociation and prolactin-sparing properties. Surprisingly, haloperidol, a highly prolactin-releasing antagonist, shared intermediate dissociation properties. Factors other than kinetic properties may thus contribute to prolactin-releasing properties of antagonists. Partial agonists sharing similar efficacies and receptor occupancies differed markedly in their ability to induce hyperprolactinaemia. Aripiprazole moderately released prolactin even at high receptor occupancies, with slow dissociation from D₂ receptors. Other compounds displaying low affinities and fast dissociations released prolactin substantially, although less than haloperidol. The effect augmented after repeated administrations. Compounds with high affinities and slow dissociation rates stimulated moderate prolactin release at high receptor occupancies, reaching a ceiling effect at 50-60% occupancy. Moreover, the effect developed tolerance. In conclusion, we investigated the affinity and kinetic properties of D₂ partial agonists associated with their ability to induce prolactin release in blood. We propose that for D₂ partial agonists, at comparable intrinsic activities and peripheral occupancies, the prolactin-releasing properties are linked to their kinetic rate properties. Differently from D₂ antagonists, partial agonists display slow dissociation and high affinity associated with a low prolactin release profile.

Predicting brain occupancy from plasma levels using PET: superiority of combining pharmacokinetics with pharmacodynamics while modeling the relationship

Positron emission tomography (PET) studies of dopamine receptor occupancy can be used to assess dosing of antipsychotics. Typically, studies of antipsychotics have applied pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling alone to characterize the relationship between antipsychotic dose and its effect on the brain. However, a limitation of this approach is that it does not account for the discrepancy between the time courses of plasma concentration and receptor occupancy by antipsychotics. Combined pharmacokinetic-PD (PK-PD) modeling, by incorporating the time dependence of occupancy, is better suited for the reliable analysis of the concentration-occupancy relationship. To determine the effect of time on the concentration-occupancy relationship as a function of analysis approach, we measured dopamine receptor occupancy after the administration of aripiprazole using [(11)C]raclopride PET and obtained serial measurements of the plasma aripiprazole concentration in 18 volunteers. We then developed a PK-PD model for the relationship, and compared it with conventional approach (PD modeling alone). The hysteresis characteristics were observed in the competitor concentration-occupancy relationship and the value of EC(50) was different according to the analysis approach (EC(50) derived from PD modeling alone=11.1 ng/mL (95% confidence interval (CI)=10.1 to 12.1); while that derived from combined PK-PD modeling=8.63 ng/mL (95% CI=7.75 to 9.51)). This finding suggests that PK-PD modeling is required to obtain reliable prediction of brain occupancy by antipsychotics.

Hyperprolactinemia induced by low-dosage amisulpride in Korean psychiatric patients

AIM

Amisulpride at low dosages enhances dopaminergic neurotransmission by preferentially blocking presynaptic D2/D3 receptors. Thus, low dosages of amisulpride are expected not to increase prolactin levels. The aim of this study was to examine whether low dosages of amisulpride can increase serum levels of prolactin or not clinically in Korean patients.

METHOD

Serum prolactin levels were measured in 20 Korean patients (12 men and eight women) with various diagnoses who were treated with less than 300 mg of amisulpride per day.

RESULTS

The mean dosage of amisulpride was 195.0 ± 51.0 mg/day, and serum level of prolactin was 76.1 ± 43.4 ng/mL. The prolactin level was significantly higher in women (110.7 ± 49.3 ng/mL) than in men (53.1 ± 15.9 ng/mL) after administering amisulpride (P = 0.021), while the dosage of amisulpride did not differ significantly between men (200.0 ± 42.6 mg/day) and women (187.5 ± 64.1 mg/day) (P = 0.576).

CONCLUSIONS

The low dosages of amisulpride elevate serum prolactin level in the majority of patients. This finding indicates that the dose-reduction of amisulpride has little effect to relieve amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia at therapeutic dosages. Clinicians should monitor serum prolactin level even when low dosages of amisulpride are administered.

Clomipramine-induced serum prolactin as a marker for serotonin and dopamine turnover: results of an open label study

Central nervous system (CNS) monoamine deficits have been linked to a number of pathological conditions such as major depressive disorder. Individual biological variations in 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) might account for the variation in responses of neurotransmitter systems observed after the administration of clomipramine. The prolactin response to clomipramine has been widely used to assess CNS functioning. This open label study investigates the prolactin response induced by clomipramine in the plasma of healthy volunteers and whether it is related to changes in monoamine metabolites. The effects of clomipramine challenge on prolactin, 5-HIAA, HVA and MHPG were measured in 12 healthy volunteers. Samples were drawn directly before and 50 min after clomipramine infusion. A statistically significant increase in serum prolactin concentrations was measured in women 50 min after CMI infusion, but not in men. We found no significant increases in the serum monoamine metabolite concentrations 50 min after CMI infusion. Changes in HVA and 5-HIAA correlated statistically significantly and positively with the amount of prolactin release in the whole sample. Furthermore, positive correlations were found between ∆(50-0 min) 5-HIAA and ∆(50-0 min) HVA, although we did not find a correlation between ∆(50-0 min) prolactin and ∆(50-0 min) MHPG after clomipramine challenge. The pronounced prolactin release in healthy adult women might indicate a higher physiological sensitivity. Correlations between intra-individual changes in HVA, 5-HIAA and serum prolactin might indicate a central nervous effect of clomipramine on monoamine turnover. We conclude that monoamine changes in relation to prolactin response after clomipramine challenge may be suitable for characterizing the relationship between central serotonergic and dopaminergic function.

Nelfinavir induces radiation sensitization in pituitary adenoma cells

Pituitary adenomas with local invasion and high secretory activity remain a therapeutic challenge. The HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir is a radiosensitizer in multiple tumor models. We tested nelfinavir as a radiosensitizer in pituitary adenoma cells in vitro and in vivo. We examined the effect of nelfinavir with radiation on in vitro cell viability, clonogenic survival, apoptosis, prolactin secretion, cell cycle distribution, and the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. We evaluated tumor growth delay and confirmed nelfinavir's effect on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway in a hind-flank model. Nelfinavir sensitized pituitary adenoma cells to ionizing radiation as shown by viability assays and clonogenic assay with an enhancement ratio of 1.2 (p < 0.05). There is increased apoptotic cell death, as determined by annexin-V expression and cleaved caspase-3 levels. Nelfinavir does not affect prolactin secretion or cell cycle distribution. In vivo, untreated tumors reached 4-fold volume in 12 days, 17 days with nelfinavir treatment, 27 days with radiation 6 Gy, and 41 days with nelfinavir plus radiation (one-way ANOVA p < 0.001). Decreased phospho-S6 on Western blotting in vitro and immunohistochemistry in vivo demonstrated nelfinavir inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Our data suggests a promising combination therapy with nelfinavir plus radiation in pituitary adenomas, which should be investigated in clinical studies.

Central nervous system drug evaluation using positron emission tomography

In conventional pharmacological research in the field of mental disorders, pharmacological effect and dose have been estimated by ethological approach and in vitro data of affinity to the site of action. In addition, the frequency of administration has been estimated from drug kinetics in blood. However, there is a problem regarding an objective index of drug effects in the living body. Furthermore, the possibility that the concentration of drug in blood does not necessarily reflect the drug kinetics in target organs has been pointed out. Positron emission tomography (PET) techniques have made progress for more than 20 years, and made it possible to measure the distribution and kinetics of small molecule components in living brain. In this article, we focused on rational drug dosing using receptor occupancy and proof-of-concept of drugs in the drug development process using PET.

Risk of osteoporosis and fracture incidence in patients on antipsychotic medication

INTRODUCTION

In patients suffering from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, antipsychotics are the mainstay of treatment worldwide. By blocking D(2) brain mesolimbic receptors, antipsychotics are believed to reduce and control psychotic experiences, but recent evidence has suggested that they may also have adverse effects on bone mineral architecture and fracture incidence.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviews current literature surrounding the use of antipsychotics and their effects on bone homeostasis. The primary medical search engines used for the study are Ovid MEDLINE (1950 - April 2010), EMBASE (1988 - April 2010) and PsychINFO (1987 - April 2010) databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Typical antipsychotics, in addition to the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and amisulpride, have been shown to increase serum prolactin levels in in vivo human studies. Results from animal and human in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that high concentrations of prolactin have been shown to adversely affect bone cell metabolism and accelerate the rate bone mineral density loss, thereby increasing fracture risk. Increasing awareness of the side effect profile of antipsychotic medications on bone metabolism may prompt clinicians to screen patients at high risk of antipsychotic-induced osteoporosis and provide treatment, which may reduce the incidence of potentially avoidable fractures.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of risperidone versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in treating schizophrenia

Monotherapy is recommended for schizophrenia treatment, but the risk-benefit issue of antipsychotic drug combination (except for clozapine) remains unclear. Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic drug, has a lower incidence of extrapyramidal syndrome but higher risks of prolactinemia and metabolic syndrome than haloperidol, a typical agent. This study compared efficacy and safety of risperidone monotherapy versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in schizophrenia. In this 6-week, double-blind study, patients were randomized to the combination group (2-mg/d risperidone plus 2-mg/d haloperidol, n = 46) or the monotherapy group (4-mg/d risperidone, n = 42). Efficacy assessments included Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and subscales, Calgary Depression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36. Safety was rigorously monitored. Response was defined as 30% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. The 2 treatment groups were similar in (1) demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline, (2) response rate, and (3) improvement in various psychopathological measures and quality of life at end point. The monotherapy group had a higher increase in prolactin levels (P = 0.04) and Simpson-Angus Scale scores (P = 0.04) and a higher percentage of biperiden use (P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group difference in changes in weight, vital signs, corrected QT interval, liver/renal function, fasting glucose level, and lipid profiles. The findings suggest that risperidone monotherapy may yield higher prolactin levels than a combination of low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol. The 2 treatment groups are similar in efficacy, life quality, and other safety profiles. Future long-term studies are warranted.

Hyperprolactinemia associated with psychotropics--a review

INTRODUCTION

Different classes of psychotropics can cause hyperprolactinemia to varying degrees. Among antipsychotics, typical agents and risperidone are the most frequent and significant offenders. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology, offending medications, assessment and management of hyperprolactinemia.

METHODS

We did a literature review between 1976 and 2008 using PubMed, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Cochrane database. Search terms used were prolactin, hyperprolactinemia, psychotropics, antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants and SSRIs.

RESULTS

Prolactin elevation is more common with antipsychotics than with other classes of drugs. Typical antipsychotics are more prone to cause hyperprolactinemia than atypical agents. Management options include discontinuation of offending medication, switching to another psychotropic, supplementing concurrent hormonal deficiencies and adding a dopamine agonist or aripiprazole.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians need to be alert about the potential for hyperprolactinemia and its manifestations with these medications. Prolactin levels need to be monitored and other causes of hyperprolactinemia ruled out in suspected cases.

Antipsychotic efficacy: relationship to optimal D2-receptor occupancy

Clinically important differences exist between antipsychotic agents and formulations in terms of safety and tolerability. Features of the biochemical interaction between the antipsychotic and the D2-receptor may underlie these differences. This article reviews current information on the relationship between antipsychotic receptor occupancy and clinical response. A literature search was performed using the keywords 'antipsychotic or neuroleptic', 'receptor' and 'occupancy' and 'dopamine' and 'D2' supplemented by the authors' knowledge of the literature. Imaging and clinical data have generally supported the hypotheses that optimal D2-receptor occupancy in the striatum lies in a 'therapeutic window' between approximately 65 and approximately 80%, however, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a drug should also be taken into account to fully evaluate its therapeutic effects. Additional research, perhaps in preclinical models, is needed to establish D2-receptor occupancy in various regions of the brain and the optimal duration of D2-receptor blockade in order to maximise efficacy and tolerability profiles of atypical antipsychotics and thereby improve treatment outcomes for patients with schizophrenia.

Amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia is reversible following discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Although amisulpride is considered to be a prolactin-raising atypical antipsychotic drug, a limited number of studies have documented the extent of its prolactin-elevating properties. In the present study the effect of amisulpride on plasma levels of prolactin and the reversibility of this untoward side effect were investigated.

METHODS

17 patients with various diagnoses received amisulpride (50-800 mg/day) or a combination of amisulpride plus other medication as needed. Plasma prolactin was determined 26.7+/-9.4 days (range: 13-50 days) after initiation of treatment and in 3 cases after a much longer period, and 14-51 days following its withdrawal.

RESULTS

All patients on amisulpride had hyperprolactinemia (mean+/-S.D. prolactin levels: 62.5+/-33.0 ng/ml) with females exhibiting considerably higher prolactin levels than males. Following amisulpride discontinuation prolactin levels were significantly (p<000) reduced (mean+/-S.D. prolactin levels: 12.3+/-6.7 ng/ml). No significant correlation was detected between prolactin levels and either amisulpride dosage or duration of administration.

CONCLUSION

Amisulpride has a pronounced prolactin-elevating effect which appears to be independent of dosage and duration of administration. Hyperprolactinemia rapidly reverses following amisulpride discontinuation.

How antipsychotics work-from receptors to reality

How does a small molecule blocking a few receptors change a patients' passionately held paranoid belief that the FBI is out to get him? To address this central puzzle of antipsychotic action, we review a framework linking dopamine neurochemistry to psychosis, and then link this framework to the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. Normal dopamine transmission has a role in predicting novel rewards and in marking and responding to motivationally salient stimuli. Abnormal dopamine transmission alters these processes and results in an aberrant sense of novelty and inappropriate assignment of salience leading to the experience of psychosis. Antipsychotics improve psychosis by diminishing this abnormal transmission by blocking the dopamine D2/3 receptor (not D1 or D4), and although several brain regions may be involved, it is suggested that the ventral striatal regions (analog of the nucleus accumbens in animals) may have a particularly critical role. Contrary to popular belief, the antipsychotic effect is not delayed in its onset, but starts within the first few days. There is more improvement in the first 2 weeks, than in any subsequent 2-week period thereafter. However, a simple organic molecule cannot target the complex phenomenology of the individual psychotic experience. Antipsychotics diminish dopamine transmission and thereby dampen the salience of the pre-occupying symptoms. Therefore, in the initial stage of an antipsychotic response, the patients experience a detachment from symptoms, a relegation of the delusions and hallucinations to the back of their minds, rather than a complete erasure of the symptoms. Only with time, and only in some, via the mediation of new learning and plasticity, is there a complete resolution of symptoms. The implications of these findings for clinical care, animal models, future target discovery and drug development are discussed.

Intracranial self-administration of cocaine within the posterior ventral tegmental area of Wistar rats: evidence for involvement of serotonin-3 receptors and dopamine neurons

The rewarding properties of cocaine have been postulated to be regulated, in part, by the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system. The present study assessed whether adult female Wistar rats would self-administer cocaine directly into the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Following guide cannulae surgery aimed at either the posterior or anterior VTA, subjects were placed in an operant box equipped with an active lever that caused the delivery of the infusate and an inactive lever that did not. Posterior and anterior VTA subjects were randomly assigned to one of six groups that self-administered either artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) or 25 to 400 pmol cocaine/100 nl in aCSF for the first four sessions, aCSF in sessions 5 and 6, and the acquisition dose of infusate during session 7. Additionally, the effects of increasing the time-out period, higher concentrations of cocaine, coadministration of a 5HT3 antagonist, and coadministration of a D2/3 agonist on self-infusion of cocaine were determined. Self-infusions were maintained when the time-out period was extended from 5 to 25 s. Coinfusion of a 5HT3 antagonist or D2/3 agonist blocked the self-infusion of cocaine. In contrast, rats did not self-administer 25 to 400 pmol/100 nl cocaine into the anterior VTA. Additionally, rats did not self-administer either 800 or 1600 pmol/100 nl cocaine into the posterior or anterior VTA. Overall, the data indicate that the VTA is functionally heterogeneous with regard to the rewarding actions of cocaine and that the reinforcing effects of cocaine within the posterior VTA are mediated by activation 5-HT3 receptors and DA neurons.