Influence of experimental history on nicotine self-administration in squirrel monkeys

Reinforcing and adverse observable effects of nicotine and minor tobacco alkaloids in squirrel monkeys

The most prevalent psychoactive chemical in tobacco smoke is nicotine, which has been shown to maintain tobacco consumption as well as cause acute adverse effects at high doses, like nausea and emesis. Recent studies in laboratory animals have suggested that many non-nicotine constituents of tobacco smoke (e.g., minor tobacco alkaloids) may also contribute to tobacco's overall reinforcing and adverse effects. Here, we used intravenous (IV) self-administration (n = 3) and observation (n = 4) procedures in squirrel monkeys to, respectively, compare the reinforcing and adverse observable effects of nicotine and three prominent minor tobacco alkaloids, nornicotine, anatabine, and myosmine. In self-administration studies, male squirrel monkeys were trained to respond under a second-order fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement and dose-effects functions for nicotine and each of the minor tobacco alkaloids nornicotine, anatabine, and mysomine were determined. Observation studies were conducted in a different group of male squirrel monkeys to quantify the ability of nicotine, nornicotine, anatabine, and mysomine to produce adverse overt effects, including hypersalivation, emesis, and tremors. Results show that nicotine and to a lesser extent nornicotine were readily self-administered, whereas anatabine and myosmine were not. In observation studies, all minor tobacco alkaloids produced adverse observable effects that were either comparable or more pronounced than nicotine. Collectively, the present results showing that nicotine and the minor tobacco alkaloids nornicotine, anatabine, and myosmine produce differential reinforcing and acute adverse observable effects in monkeys provides further evidence that these constituents may differently contribute to the psychopharmacological and adverse effects of tobacco consumption.

Oxycodone self-administration and reinstatement in male and female squirrel monkeys: Effects of alternative reinforcer availability

The use of non-drug alternative reinforcers has long been utilized as a component of therapeutic interventions for the management of substance use disorder; however, the conditions under which alternative reinforcers are most effective are not well characterized. This study evaluated the impact of varying the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on oxycodone self-administration and reinstatement in male and female squirrel monkeys. Subjects (n=4/sex) were trained under concurrent second-order schedules of reinforcement for intravenous oxycodone (0.001-0.1mg/kg/inj) on one lever, and sweetened condensed milk (5, 10, 20, 30% in water) on another. Oxycodone-primed reinstatement was evaluated by administering 0.32mg/kg oxycodone prior to sessions in which saline was available on the drug-paired lever. During oxycodone self-administration sessions, milk availability decreased oxycodone self-administration and preference in a concentration-dependent manner; low milk concentrations were more effective at decreasing oxycodone’s reinforcing potency in males. During reinstatement tests, milk significantly attenuated oxycodone-primed responding in both males and females; low milk concentrations were more effective at decreasing the priming effects of oxycodone in females. That alternative reinforcers differentially impacted self-administration and reinstatement in a sex-dependent manner suggests that treatment strategies that utilize alternative reinforcers may be more effective in males or females depending on when they are implemented.

Nicotine-like discriminative and aversive effects of two α4β2-selective nicotine agonists, ispronicline and metanicotine

An attempt to determine the receptor selective nature of some of nicotine's behavioral effects was undertaken through the evaluation of the ability of two nicotinic α4β2*-selective receptor agonists to produce nicotine-like effects and modify rates of responding in a discrimination assay and in an aversive stimulus assay. A group of eight rats was trained to discriminate the presence of 1 mg/kg nicotine base. Another group of 4-6 rats was trained to report the aversive effects of nicotine by selecting a lever that produced one food pellet over a second lever that produced two food pellets and an intravenous injection of nicotine. Ispronicline and metanicotine, two α4β2*-selective receptor agonists, increased selection of the nicotine-appropriate lever in a dose-related manner, up to a maximum of approximately 75%. The α4β2*-selective receptor antagonist, dihydro-beta-erythroidine blocked both the discriminative stimulus effects and the rate-suppressing effects of ispronicline, metanicotine, and small, but not large doses of nicotine. The nonselective antagonist, mecamylamine, antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of each of the three nicotine agonists as well as the rate-decreasing effects of nicotine and metanicotine. Mecamylamine did not modify the rate-decreasing effects of ispronicline. Both ispronicline and metanicotine as well as nicotine were avoided in the drug + food vs. food choice situation. The receptor-selective nature of ispronicline and metanicotine was hereby confirmed in a behavioral assay, as were earlier reports that the discriminative stimulus effects of relatively small doses of nicotine are likely mediated by activity at the α4β2* nicotine receptor.

Involvement of Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes in the Behavioral Effects of Nicotinic Drugs in Squirrel Monkeys

Evidence suggests that the α4β2, but not the α7, subtype of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) plays a key role in mediating the behavioral effects of nicotine and related drugs. However, the importance of other nAChR subtypes remains unclear. The present studies were conducted to examine the involvement of nAChR subtypes by determining the effects of selected nicotinic agonists and antagonists in squirrel monkeys either 1) responding for food reinforcement or 2) discriminating the nicotinic agonist (+)-epibatidine (0.001 mg/kg) from vehicle. In food-reinforcement studies, nicotine, (+)-epibatidine, varenicline and cytisine all produced dose-dependent decreases in rates of food-maintained responding. The rate-decreasing effects of nicotine were antagonized by mecamylamine (nonselective), not appreciably altered by dihydro-β-erythroidine (α4β2 selective), and exacerbated by the nicotinic partial agonists, varenicline and cytisine. Results from discrimination studies show that non-nicotinic drugs did not substitute for (+)-epibatidine, and that except for lobeline, the nicotinic agonists produced either full [(+)-epibatidine, (-)-epibatidine, and nicotine] or partial (varenicline, cytisine, anabaseine, and isoarecolone) substitution for (+)-epibatidine. In interaction studies with antagonists differing in selectivity, (+)-epibatidine discrimination was substantively antagonized by mecamylamine, slightly attenuated by hexamethonium (peripherally restricted) or dihydro-β-erythroidine, and not altered by methyllycaconitine (α7 selective). Varenicline and cytisine enhanced (+)-epibatidine's discriminative-stimulus effects. Correlational analysis revealed a close correspondence between relative behavioral potencies of nicotinic agonists in both studies and their published relative binding affinities at α4β2 and α3β4, but not α7 nAChR, subtypes. Collectively, these results are consistent with the idea that the α4β2 and α3β4, but not α7 nAChR subtypes play a role in the behavioral effects of nicotinic agonists.

Attenuated nicotine-like effects of varenicline but not other nicotinic ACh receptor agonists in monkeys receiving nicotine daily

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic treatment can differentially impact the effects of pharmacologically related drugs that differ in receptor selectivity and efficacy.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The impact of daily nicotine treatment on the effects of nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR) agonists was examined in two groups of rhesus monkeys discriminating nicotine (1.78 mg·kg-1 base weight) from saline. One group received additional nicotine treatment post-session (1.78 mg·kg-1 administered five times daily, each dose 2 h apart; i.e. Daily group), and the second group did not (Intermittent group).

KEY RESULTS

Daily repeated nicotine treatment produced a time-related increase in saliva cotinine. There was no significant difference in the ED50 values of the nicotine discriminative stimulus between the Daily and Intermittent group. Mecamylamine antagonized the effects of nicotine, whereas dihydro-β-erythroidine did not. Midazolam produced 0% nicotine-lever responding. The nAChR agonists epibatidine, RTI-36, cytisine and varenicline produced >96% nicotine-lever responding in the Intermittent group. The respective maximum effects in the Daily group were 100, 72, 59 and 28%, which shows that the ability of varenicline to produce nicotine-like responding was selectively decreased in the Daily as compared with the Intermittent group. When combined with nicotine, both varenicline and cytisine increased the potency of nicotine to produce discriminative stimulus effects.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Nicotine treatment has a greater impact on the sensitivity to the effects of varenicline as compared with some other nAChR agonists. Collectively, these results strongly suggest that varenicline differs from nicotine in its selectivity for multiple nAChR subtypes.

Interactions between nicotine and drugs of abuse: a review of preclinical findings

Polysubstance abuse is common among substance-use disorder patients, and nicotine is one of the most commonly co-used substances. Epidemiological and clinical laboratory studies suggest that nicotine, when combined with other drugs of abuse, increases intake of one or both substances. This review focuses on the preclinical literature regarding nicotine's interaction with alcohol, stimulants (i.e., cocaine, amphetamines), opioids (i.e., morphine, heroin), and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The current understanding of how these various classes of abused drugs may interact with nicotine on behavioral, physiological, and pharmacological indices that may be important in maintaining co-use of one or both substances in human populations are highlighted. Suggestions as to future areas of research and gaps in knowledge are offered.