Assessment of a glycine uptake inhibitor in animal models of effort-related choice behavior: implications for motivational dysfunctions

Auditory brainstem responses are resistant to pharmacological modulation in Sprague Dawley wild-type and Neurexin1α knockout rats

Sensory processing in the auditory brainstem can be studied with auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) across species. There is, however, a limited understanding of ABRs as tools to assess the effect of pharmacological interventions. Therefore, we set out to understand how pharmacological agents that target key transmitter systems of the auditory brainstem circuitry affect ABRs in rats. Given previous studies, demonstrating that Nrxn1α KO Sprague Dawley rats show substantial auditory processing deficits and altered sensitivity to GABAergic modulators, we used both Nrxn1α KO and wild-type littermates in our study. First, we probed how different commonly used anesthetics (isoflurane, ketamine/xylazine, medetomidine) affect ABRs. In the next step, we assessed the effects of different pharmacological compounds (diazepam, gaboxadol, retigabine, nicotine, baclofen, and bitopertin) either under isoflurane or medetomidine anesthesia. We found that under our experimental conditions, ABRs are largely unaffected by diverse pharmacological modulation. Significant modulation was observed with (i) nicotine, affecting the late ABRs components at 90 dB stimulus intensity under isoflurane anesthesia in both genotypes and (ii) retigabine, showing a slight decrease in late ABRs deflections at 80 dB stimulus intensity, mainly in isoflurane anesthetized Nrxn1α KO rats. Our study suggests that ABRs in anesthetized rats are resistant to a wide range of pharmacological modulators, which has important implications for the applicability of ABRs to study auditory brainstem physiology.

Astrocytic lactate dehydrogenase A regulates neuronal excitability and depressive-like behaviors through lactate homeostasis in mice

Alterations in energy metabolism are associated with depression. However, the role of glycolysis in the pathogenesis of depression and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unexplored. Through an unbiased proteomic screen coupled with biochemical verifications, we show that the levels of glycolysis and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), a glycolytic enzyme that catalyzes L-lactate production, are reduced in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) of stress-susceptible mice in chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) model. Conditional knockout of LDHA from the brain promotes depressive-like behaviors in both male and female mice, accompanied with reduced L-lactate levels and decreased neuronal excitability in the dmPFC. Moreover, these phenotypes could be duplicated by knockdown of LDHA in the dmPFC or specifically in astrocytes. In contrast, overexpression of LDHA reverses these phenotypic changes in CSDS-susceptible mice. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that L-lactate promotes neuronal excitability through monocarboxylic acid transporter 2 (MCT2) and by inhibiting large-conductance Ca²⁺-activated potassium (BK) channel. Together, these results reveal a role of LDHA in maintaining neuronal excitability to prevent depressive-like behaviors.

Pharmacokinetic profile of bitopertin, a selective GlyT1 inhibitor, in the rat

Bitopertin, a selective glycine transporter 1 (GlyT₁) inhibitor, has been extensively studied for the treatment of schizophrenia, with known safety and tolerability profiles in the clinic. Whereas several rodent experiments have been reported, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of bitopertin in rodents has not been extensively reported, as only two studies disclosed limited PK parameters in male rats after oral administration. Here, we determined the PK profile of bitopertin in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Blood samples were taken serially, before and after sub-cutaneous (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) or intra-venous (0.1 mg/kg) administration. Plasma levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with heat-assisted electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-HESI MS/MS). Subsequently, PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), time (T_max) to maximal plasma concentration (C_max), clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V_z), as well as half-life (T_1/2). Following sub-cutaneous injection, bitopertin exhibited dose-dependent AUC_0-∞ (439.6-34,018.9 ng/mL) and T_max (3.7-24.0 h), a very long terminal T_1/2 (35.06-110.32 h) and low CL (0.07-0.13 L/h/kg), suggesting that bitopertin is slowly absorbed and eliminated in the rat. The observed relationship between dose and the extent of drug exposure (AUC) was linear. Following administration of all sub-cutaneous doses, measured bitopertin plasma levels were comparable to levels achieved with doses already administered in the clinic. We hope that our results will be useful in the design of pre-clinical experiments in which this drug will eventually be administered sub-cutaneously.

The Psychopharmacology of Effort-Related Decision Making: Dopamine, Adenosine, and Insights into the Neurochemistry of Motivation

Effort-based decision making is studied using tasks that offer choices between high-effort options leading to more highly valued reinforcers versus low-effort/low-reward options. These tasks have been used to study the involvement of neural systems, including mesolimbic dopamine and related circuits, in effort-related aspects of motivation. Moreover, such tasks are useful as animal models of some of the motivational symptoms that are seen in people with depression, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and other disorders. The present review will discuss the pharmacology of effort-related decision making and will focus on the use of these tasks for the development of drug treatments for motivational dysfunction. Research has identified pharmacological conditions that can alter effort-based choice and serve as models for depression-related symptoms (e.g., the vesicular monoamine transport-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine and proinflammatory cytokines). Furthermore, tests of effort-based choice have identified compounds that are particularly useful for stimulating high-effort work output and reversing the deficits induced by tetrabenazine and cytokines. These studies indicate that drugs that act by facilitating dopamine transmission, as well as adenosine A_2A antagonists, are relatively effective at reversing effort-related impairments. Studies of effort-based choice may lead to the identification of drug targets that could be useful for treating motivational treatments that are resistant to commonly used antidepressants such as serotonin transport inhibitors.

Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research

Operant behavior is not only regulated by factors related to the quality or quantity of reinforcement, but also by the work requirements inherent in performing instrumental actions. Moreover, organisms often make effort-related decisions involving economic choices such as cost/benefit analyses. Effort-based decision making is studied using behavioral procedures that offer choices between high-effort options leading to relatively preferred reinforcers vs. low effort/low reward choices. Several neural systems, including the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system and other brain circuits, are involved in regulating effort-related aspects of motivation. Considerable evidence indicates that mesolimbic DA transmission exerts a bi-directional control over exertion of effort on instrumental behavior tasks. Interference with DA transmission produces a low-effort bias in animals tested on effort-based choice tasks, while increasing DA transmission with drugs such as DA transport blockers tends to enhance selection of high-effort options. The results from these pharmacology studies are corroborated by the findings from recent articles using optogenetic, chemogenetic and physiological techniques. In addition to providing important information about the neural regulation of motivated behavior, effort-based choice tasks are useful for developing animal models of some of the motivational symptoms that are seen in people with various psychiatric and neurological disorders (e.g., depression, schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease). Studies of effort-based decision making may ultimately contribute to the development of novel drug treatments for motivational dysfunction.

Caffeine Modulates Food Intake Depending on the Context That Gives Access to Food: Comparison With Dopamine Depletion

Caffeine is a methylxanthine consumed in different contexts to potentiate alertness and reduce fatigue. However, caffeine can induce anxiety at high doses. Caffeine is also a minor psychostimulant that seems to act as an appetite suppressant, but there are also reports indicating that it could stimulate appetite. Dopamine also is involved in food motivation and in behavioral activation. In the present series of experiments, we evaluated the effects of acute administration of caffeine on food consumption under different access conditions. CD1 male adult mice had access to highly palatable food (50% sucrose) in a restricted but habitual context, under continuous or intermittent access as well as under anxiogenic, or effortful conditions. Caffeine (2.5-20.0 mg/kg) increased intake at the highest dose under familiar continuous and intermittent access. However, this high dose reduced food intake in the dark-light paradigm. In contrast, a dopamine-depleting agent, tetrabenazine (TBZ; 1.0-8.0 mg/kg) did not affect food intake in any of those experimental conditions. In the T-maze-barrier task that evaluates seeking and taking of food under effortful conditions, caffeine (10.0 mg/kg) decreased latency to reach the food, but did not affect selection of the high-food density arm that required more effort, or the total amount of food consumed. In contrast, TBZ (4.0 mg/kg) reduced selection of the high food density arm with the barrier, thus affecting amount of food consumed. Interestingly, a small dose of caffeine (5.0 mg/kg) was able to reverse the anergia-inducing effects produced by TBZ in the T-maze. These results suggest that caffeine can potentiate or suppress food consumption depending on the context. Moreover, caffeine did not change appetite, and did not impair orientation toward food under effortful conditions, but it rather helped to achieve the goal by improving speed and by reversing performance to normal levels when fatigue was induced by dopamine depletion.