Urinary profile of methylprednisolone acetate metabolites in patients following intra-articular and intramuscular administration

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: The Reversible Metabolism and Tissue-Specific Partitioning of Methylprednisolone and Methylprednisone in Rats

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of methylprednisolone (MPL) exhibited tissue-specific saturable binding and reversible conversion with its metabolite, methylprednisone (MPN). Blood and 11 tissues were collected in male rats after intravenous (i.v.) bolus doses of 50 mg/kg MPL and 20 mg/kg MPN and upon i.v. infusion of MPL and MPN at 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/h per kg. The concentrations of MPL and MPN were simultaneously measured. A comprehensive physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was applied to describe the plasma and tissue profiles and estimate PK parameters of the MPL/MPN interconversion system. Both dosed and formed MPL and MPN were in rapid equilibrium or achieved steady-state rapidly in plasma and tissues. MPL tissue partitioning was nonlinear, with highest capacity in liver (322.9 ng/ml) followed by kidney, heart, intestine, skin, spleen, bone, brain, muscle, and lowest in adipose (2.74 ng/ml) and displaying high penetration in lung. The tissue partition coefficient of MPN was linear but widely variable (0.15∼5.38) across most tissues, with nonlinear binding in liver and kidney. The conversion of MPL to MPN occurred in kidney, lung, and intestine with total clearance of 429 ml/h, and the back conversion occurred in liver and kidney at 1342 ml/h. The irreversible elimination clearance of MPL was 789 ml/h from liver and that of MPN was 2758 ml/h with liver accounting for 44%, lung 35%, and kidney 21%. The reversible metabolism elevated MPL exposure in rats by 13%. This highly complex PBPK model provided unique and comprehensive insights into the disposition of a major corticosteroid. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our dual physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) study and model of methylprednisolone/methylprednisone (MPL/MPN) with multiple complexities reasonably characterized and parameterized their disposition, and provided greater insights into the interpretation of their pharmacodynamics in rats. Drug knowledge gained in this study may be translatable to higher-order species to appreciate the clinical utility of MPL. The complex model itself is instructive for advanced PBPK analysis of drugs with reversible metabolism and/or nonlinear tissue partitioning features.

Current Insights and Molecular Docking Studies of the Drugs under Clinical Trial as RdRp Inhibitors in COVID-19 Treatment

Study Background & Objective: After the influenza pandemic (1918), COVID-19 was declared a Vth pandemic by the WHO in 2020. SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA-enveloped single-stranded virus. Based on the structure and life cycle, Protease (3CLpro), RdRp, ACE2, IL-6, and TMPRSS2 are the major targets for drug development against COVID-19. Pre-existing several drugs (FDA-approved) are used to inhibit the above targets in different diseases. In coronavirus treatment, these drugs are also in different clinical trial stages. Remdesivir (RdRp inhibitor) is the only FDA-approved medicine for coronavirus treatment. In the present study, by using the drug repurposing strategy, 70 preexisting clinical or under clinical trial molecules were used in scrutiny for RdRp inhibitor potent molecules in coronavirus treatment being surveyed via docking studies. Molecular simulation studies further confirmed the binding mechanism and stability of the most potent compounds.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Docking studies were performed using the Maestro 12.9 module of Schrodinger software over 70 molecules with RdRp as the target and remdesivir as the standard drug and further confirmed by simulation studies.

RESULTS

The docking studies showed that many HIV protease inhibitors demonstrated remarkable binding interactions with the target RdRp. Protease inhibitors such as lopinavir and ritonavir are effective. Along with these, AT-527, ledipasvir, bicalutamide, and cobicistat showed improved docking scores. RMSD and RMSF were further analyzed for potent ledipasvir and ritonavir by simulation studies and were identified as potential candidates for corona disease.

CONCLUSION

The drug repurposing approach provides a new avenue in COVID-19 treatment.

A preliminary study on urinary excretion patterns of methylprednisolone after oral and intra-articular administration and effect on endogenous glucocorticosteroids profile

INTRODUCTION:

The use of glucocorticosteroids (GCs) through oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or rectal routes is prohibited in sports. Its use is permitted through inhalation, topical and intra-articular route of administration. Methylprednisolone (MP) is available for use by different routes for anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive purposes. To discriminate its intake by permitted & forbidden routes, a reporting level of 30 ng/ml is set by World Anti-Doping Agency. The aim of this study was to compare MP's excretion profile following oral & intra-articular administration & to evaluate its effect on endogenous GCs profile.

MATERIALS & METHODS:

The MP was administered through oral and intra-articular route to different patients & urine samples were collected up to 100 h. The urine samples were hydrolyzed, extracted, and analyzed on Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/MS.

RESULTS:

MP levels in urine exceeded the reporting limit of 30 ng/ml after oral (8 mg) and intra-articular administration (80 mg) routes. After oral intake (8 mg), MP levels exceeded the reporting level up to 24 h. However, after intra-articular injection (80 mg), the MP could be detected above the reporting level up to 80 h.

CONCLUSION:

The findings reveal that the MP can exceed the reporting level in urine even after administration by permitted route (i.a.). Further analysis of four endogenous GCs (Cortisol, Cortisone, TH Cortisone, and 11-deoxycortisol) showed a decreased excretion following administration of MP by oral & intra-articular routes.

A novel approach to improve detection of glucocorticoid doping in sport with new guidance for physicians prescribing for athletes

The systemic effect of glucocorticoids (GCs) following injectable routes of administration presents a potential risk to both improving performance and causing harm to health in athletes. This review evaluates the current GC antidoping regulations defined by the World Anti-Doping Agency and presents a novel approach for defining permitted and prohibited use of glucocorticoids in sport based on the pharmacological potential for performance enhancement (PE) and risk of adverse effects on health. Known performance-enhancing doses of glucocorticoids are expressed in terms of cortisol-equivalent doses and thereby the dose associated with a high potential for PE for any GC and route of administration can be derived. Consequently, revised and substance-specific laboratory reporting values are presented to better distinguish between prohibited and permitted use in sport. In addition, washout periods are presented to enable clinicians to prescribe glucocorticoids safely and to avoid the risk of athletes testing positive for a doping test.

Elimination profiles of prednisone and prednisolone after different administration routes: Evaluation of the reporting level and washout periods to ensure safe therapeutic administrations

Prednisolone (PRED) and prednisone (PSONE) are prohibited in sports competitions when administered by systemic routes, and they are allowed by other routes for therapeutic purposes. There is no restriction of use in out-of-competition periods. The present study aimed to evaluate the urinary excretion of PRED, PSONE, and their most important metabolites after systemic and nonsystemic treatments in order to verify the suitability of the current reporting level of 30 ng/ml used to distinguish allowed and prohibited administrations and to establish washout periods for oral treatments performed in out-of-competition periods. PRED was studied after dermatological administration (5 mg/day for 5 days, n = 6 males) and oral administration (5 mg, n = 6 males; 10 mg, n = 2 males). PSONE was studied after oral administration (10 mg, n = 2 males; 30 mg, n = 1 male and 1 female). Concentrations in urine were measured using an LC-MS/MS method. Concentrations after dermatological treatment were low for all metabolites. After oral administration, concentrations were very high during the first 24 h after administration ranging from 1.6 to 2261 ng/ml and from 4.6 to 908 ng/ml for PRED and PSONE, respectively. Concentrations of most of the metabolites measured were lower than 30 ng/ml from 24 h after all oral administrations. New reporting levels are proposed for PRED and PSONE considering data of our study and other information published after nonsystemic administrations of the compounds. Washout periods of at least 24 h are recommended to ensure no false positives when oral treatments need to be performed in out-of-competition periods.

Elimination profiles of betamethasone after different administration routes: Evaluation of the reporting level and washout periods to ensure safe therapeutic administrations

Betamethasone (BET) is prohibited in sports competitions when administered by systemic routes, and it is allowed by other routes for therapeutic purposes. In out-of-competition periods, there is no restriction of use. The present work aimed to assess the urinary excretion of BET and its metabolites after allowed and prohibited administrations to verify the suitability of the current reporting level of 30 ng/ml used to distinguish allowed and prohibited administrations and to establish washout periods for oral and intramuscular (IM) administrations when out-of-competition treatments are needed. BET was administered to healthy volunteers by different routes: topical (10 mg/day for 5 days, n = 6 males), intranasal (320 μg/day for 3 days, n = 4 males and 4 females), oral (0.5 mg, n = 8 males) or IM (6 mg, n = 6 males, or 12 mg, n = 4 males and 4 females). Urine and plasma samples collected before and after administration were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among all studied metabolites, the parent drug was selected as the best discriminatory marker. After topical administration, BET concentrations were lower than 6.6 ng/ml. However, after intranasal treatment, some samples at concentrations close to or higher than 30 ng/ml were detected, suggesting the need to revise the current reporting level. Urinary concentrations after oral and intranasal administrations were similar, and after IM administration, concentrations were much higher. Taking into account all information, a urinary reporting level of 60 ng/ml is proposed. Washout periods of at least 48 and 96 h are recommended after oral and IM administrations, respectively.

Elimination profile of triamcinolone hexacetonide and its metabolites in human urine and plasma after a single intra-articular administration

Triamcinolone hexacetonide (THA) is a synthetic glucocorticoid (GC) used by intra-articular (IA) administration. GCs are prohibited in sports competitions by systemic routes, and they are allowed by other routes considered of local action (IA administration, among others). The aim of the present work was to study the metabolic profile of THA in urine and plasma following IA administration. Eight patients (4 males and 4 females) with knee osteoarthritis received an IA dose of THA (40 mg) in the knee joint. Spot urine and plasma samples were collected before injection and at different time periods up to day 23 and 10 post-administration, respectively. The samples were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Neither THA nor specific THA metabolites were detected in urine. Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and 6β-hydroxy-triamcinolone acetonide were the main urinary metabolites. Maximum concentrations wereobtained between 24 and 48 h after administration. Using the reporting level of 30 ng/mL to distinguish allowed from forbidden administrations of GCs, a large number of false adverse analytical findings would be reported up to day 4. On the other hand, TA was detected in all plasma samples collected up to day 10 after administration. THA was also detected in plasma but at lower concentrations. The detection of plasma THA would be an unequivocal proof to demonstrate IA use of THA. A reversible decrease was observed in plasma concentrations of cortisol in some of the patients, indicating a systemic effect of the drug.

Biorelevant release testing of biodegradable microspheres intended for intra-articular administration

Characterization of controlled release formulations used for intra-articular (IA) drug administration is challenging. Bio-relevant synovial fluids (BSF), containing physiologically relevant amounts of hyaluronic acid, phospholipids and proteins, were recently proposed to simulate healthy and osteoarthritic conditions. This work aims to evaluate the performance of different controlled release formulations of methylprednisolone (MP) for IA administration, under healthy and disease states simulated conditions. Microspheres differed in grade of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and in the theoretical drug content (i.e. 23 or 30% w/w). Their performance was compared with the commercially available suspension of MP acetate (MPA). Under osteoarthritic state simulated condition, proteins increased the MPA release and reduced the MPA hydrolysis rate, over 48 h. Regarding microspheres, the release patterns over 40 days were significantly influenced by the composition of BSF. The pattern of the release mechanism and the amount released was affected by the presence of proteins. Protein concentration affected the release and the concentration used is critical, particularly given the relevance of the concentrations to target patient populations, i.e. patients with osteoarthritis.

Bioanalytical techniques in discrimination between therapeutic and abusive use of drugs in sport

The discrimination between therapeutic and abusive use of drugs in sports is performed using threshold concentrations or reporting levels, and the detection of the substances in a sample is only reported as an adverse analytical finding when the concentration exceeds the threshold or the reporting level. In this paper, the strategies of discrimination and the analytical methods used for the main groups of substances where the distinction is needed (β-2 agonists, ephedrines, glucocorticoids and morphine) will be reviewed. Nowadays, LC–MS is the method of choice for the analysis of these substances and, in most of the cases, a simple dilution of the urine sample is performed before the chromatographic analysis.

Positive doping results caused by the single-dose local injection of triamcinolone acetonide

Triamcinolone acetonide (TA) is classified as an S9 glucocorticoid in the 2014 Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which caused it to be prohibited in-competition when administered orally, intravenously, intramuscularly or rectally. The Minimum Required Performance Level (MRPL) for the detection and identification of glucocorticoids is 30 ng/mL. Other common local injection routes, such as intraarticular, intratendinous, or intrabursal injection, are not prohibited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the TA and triamcinolone (T) concentrations in urine after a single injection of TA in patients to determine if it would produce a positive result. This study was performed on 40 patients with sports injuries or joint pains. TA was administered locally (doses varied from 12 to 80 mg). Samples were extracted using a solid-phase extraction column, followed by hydrolysis and liquid extraction using diethyl ether. The elution solvents were collected and dried. The dried residue was reconstituted and assayed by performing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in positive ionization mode using electrospray ionization and multiple-reaction monitoring as the acquisition mode. The results demonstrated that the concentrations of both TA and T in urine exceeded the MRPL (30 ng/mL) after a single local injection. We obtained positive results for TA in 25 patients, and a positive result for T in one patient. Furthermore, the metabolic situation of TA, a long-acting glucocorticoid, was not an exact linear model. The highest concentrations of TA and T appeared 1-4h after injection. This information could be useful for limiting the misuse of TA by athletes. We suggest that athletes be aware when using TA injections during a competition period and obtain approval for therapeutic use exemption prior to using TA.

Urinary profile of methylprednisolone and its metabolites after oral and topical administrations

Methylprednisolone (MP) is prohibited in sports competitions when administered by systemic routes; however its use by topical administration is allowed. Therefore, analytical approaches to distinguish between these different administration pathways are required. A reporting level of 30ng/mL was established for this purpose. However, the suitability of that reporting level for MP is not known. In the present work, excretion profiles of MP and different metabolites after oral and topical administrations have been compared. A method for the quantification of MP and the qualitative detection of fifteen previously reported metabolites has been validated. The method involved an enzymatic hydrolysis, liquid-liquid extraction and analysis by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. The method was found to be linear, selective, precise and accurate. The high sensitivity (limit of detection 0.1ng/mL) and linear range (0.1-250ng/mL) achieved allowed for the quantification of MP at both the low concentrations present after topical administration and the high concentrations detected after oral intake. The method was applied to samples collected after oral (4 or 40mg) and topical administration (10mg of MP aceponate/day for 5 consecutive days) to healthy volunteers. After oral administration, MP and all metabolites were detected in urines collected up to at least 36h. Only MP and five metabolites were detected in samples obtained after topical treatment. As expected, concentrations of MP after topical administration were well below current reporting level (30ng/mL), however 3 out of 4 samples in range 8-24h after the low oral dose (4mg) were also below that concentration. Taking into account metabolites detected after both administration routes, metabolites 16β,17α,21-trihydroxy-6α-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,11,20-trione (M8) and 17α,20α,21-trihydroxy-6α-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,11-dione (M11) are best markers to differentiate between topical and oral administrations. Their signals after topical administration were lower than those obtained in the first 48h after all oral doses.

Using complementary mass spectrometric approaches for the determination of methylprednisolone metabolites in human urine

RATIONALE

The metabolism of methylprednisolone is revisited in order to find new metabolites that could be important for distinguishing between different routes of administration. Recently developed liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) strategies for the detection of corticosteroid metabolites have been applied to the study of methylprednisolone metabolism.

METHODS

The structures of these metabolites were studied using two complementary mass spectrometric techniques: LC/MS/MS in product ion scan mode with electrospray ionization and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) in full scan mode with electron ionization. Metabolites were also isolated by semipreparative liquid chromatography fractionation. Each fraction was divided into two aliquots; one was studied by LC/MS/MS and the other by GC/MS after methoxyamine-trimethylsilyl derivatization.

RESULTS

The combination of all the structural information allowed us to propose a comprehensive picture of methylprednisolone metabolism in humans. Overall, 15 metabolites including five previously unreported compounds have been detected. Specifically, 16β,17α,21-trihydroxy-6α-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3,11,20-trione, 17α,20β,21-trihydroxy-6α-methylpregna-1,4-diene-3, 11-dione, 11β,17α,21-trihydroxy-6α-hydroxymethylpregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 11β,17α,20ξ,21-tetrahydroxy-6α-hydroxymethylpregna-1,4-diene-3-one, and 17α,21-dihydroxy-6α-hydroxymethylpregna-1,4-diene-3,11,20-trione are proposed as feasible structures for the novel metabolites. In addition to the expected biotransformations: reduction of the C20 carbonyl, oxidation of the C11 hydroxy group, and further 6β-hydroxylation, we propose that hydroxylation of the 6α-methyl group can also take place.

CONCLUSIONS

New metabolites have been identified in urine samples collected after oral administration of 40 mg of methylprednisolone. All identified metabolites were found in all samples collected up to 36 h after oral administration. However, after topical administration of 5 g of methylprednisolone aceponate, neither the parent compound nor any of the metabolites were detected.

SRMBUILDER: A USER-FRIENDLY TOOL FOR SELECTED REACTION MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS

With high sensitivity and reproducibility, selected reaction monitoring (SRM) has become increasingly popular in proteome research for targeted quantification of low abundance proteins and post translational modification. SRM is also well accepted in other mass-spectrometry based research areas such as lipidomics and metabolomics, which necessitates the development of easy-to-use software for both post-acquisition SRM data analysis and quantification result validation. Here, we introduce a software tool SRMBuilder, which can automatically parse SRM data in multiple file formats, assign transitions to compounds, match light/heavy transition/compound pairs and provide a user-friendly graphic interface to manually validate the quantification result at transition/compound/sample level. SRMBuilder will greatly facilitate processing of the post-acquisition data files and validation of quantification result for SRM. The software can be downloaded for free from as part of the software suite ProteomicsTools.