Reduced effects of tendon vibration with increased task demand during active, cyclical ankle movements

Time course and variability of tendinous vibration-induced postural reactions in forward and backward directions

Mechanical vibration of tendons induces large postural reactions (PR-VIB) but little is known about how these reactions vary within and between subjects. We investigated the intra- and inter-individual variability of PR-VIB and determined the reliability of center of pressure (COP) measures. Bipodal postural control (eyes closed) of 30 healthy adults were evaluated using a force platform under 02 conditions: bilateral VIB of the tibialis anterior (TA) and Achilles tendons (ACH-T) at 80 Hz. Each condition consisted of 03 trials of 30 s duration (Baseline: 10 s; VIB: 10 s; POST-VIB: 10 s). The Amplitude and Velocity of the COP in the antero-posterior/medio-lateral (AP/ML) directions were recorded and analyzed according to 5 time-windows incremented every 2 s of vibration (i.e. the first 2 s; 4 s; 6 s; 8 s & 10 s), whereas the COP position/AP was monitored every 0.5 s. All postural parameters increased significantly during TA and ACH-T vibration compared to the Baseline. The reliability of the COP measures showed good ICC scores (0.40-0.84) and measurement errors that varied depending on the duration of VIB time-windows. The COP position/AP reveals a lower intra- and inter-subject variability of PR-VIB in the first 2 s of VIB. The metrological characteristics of PR-VIB should be investigated further to guide their future use by clinicians and researchers.

Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning

Applying white noise vibration to the ankle tendons has previously been used to improve passive movement detection and alter postural control, likely by enhancing proprioceptive feedback. The aim of the present study was to determine if similar methods focused on the ankle plantarflexors affect the performance of both quiet standing and an active postural positioning task, in which participants may be more reliant on proprioceptive feedback from actively contracting muscles. Twenty young, healthy participants performed quiet standing trials and active postural positioning trials designed to encourage reliance on plantarflexor proprioception. Performance under normal conditions with no vibration was compared to performance with 8 levels of vibration amplitude applied to the bilateral Achilles tendons. Vibration amplitude was set either as a percentage of sensory threshold (n = 10) or by root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude (n = 10). No vibration amplitude had a significant effect on quiet standing. In contrast, accuracy of the active postural positioning task was significantly (P = .001) improved by vibration with an RMS amplitude of 30 μm. Setting vibration amplitude based on sensory threshold did not significantly affect postural positioning accuracy. The present results demonstrate that appropriate amplitude tendon vibration may hold promise for enhancing the use of proprioceptive feedback during functional active movement.

An exploratory investigation of the effects of whole-head vibration on jaw movements

The perturbing effects of vibration applied to head and body structures are known to destabilize motor control and elicit corrective responses. Although such vibration response testing may be informative for identifying sensorimotor deficits, the effect of whole-head vibration has not been tested on oromotor control. The purpose of this study was to determine how jaw movements respond to the perturbing effects of whole-head vibration during jaw motor tasks. Ten healthy adults completed speech, chewing, and two syllable repetition tasks with and without whole-head vibration. Jaw movements were recorded using 3D optical motion capture. The results showed that the direction and magnitude of the response were dependent on the task. The two syllable repetition tasks responded to vibration, although the direction of the effect differed for the two tasks. Specifically, during vibration, jaw movements became slower and smaller during the syllable repetition task that imposed speed and spatial precision demands, whereas jaw movements became faster and larger during the syllable repetition task that only imposed speed demands. In contrast, jaw movements were unaffected by the vibration during speech and chewing. These findings suggest that the response to vibration may be dependent on spatiotemporal demands, the availability of residual afferent information, and robust feedforward models.

Gait parameter control timing with dynamic manual contact or visual cues

We investigated the timing of gait parameter changes (stride length, peak toe velocity, and double-, single-support, and complete step duration) to control gait speed. Eleven healthy participants adjusted their gait speed on a treadmill to maintain a constant distance between them and a fore-aft oscillating cue (a place on a conveyor belt surface). The experimental design balanced conditions of cue modality (vision: eyes-open; manual contact: eyes-closed while touching the cue); treadmill speed (0.2, 0.4, 0.85, and 1.3 m/s); and cue motion (none, ±10 cm at 0.09, 0.11, and 0.18 Hz). Correlation analyses revealed a number of temporal relationships between gait parameters and cue speed. The results suggest that neural control ranged from feedforward to feedback. Specifically, step length preceded cue velocity during double-support duration suggesting anticipatory control. Peak toe velocity nearly coincided with its most-correlated cue velocity during single-support duration. The toe-off concluding step and double-support durations followed their most-correlated cue velocity, suggesting feedback control. Cue-tracking accuracy and cue velocity correlations with timing parameters were higher with the manual contact cue than visual cue. The cue/gait timing relationships generalized across cue modalities, albeit with greater delays of step-cycle events relative to manual contact cue velocity. We conclude that individual kinematic parameters of gait are controlled to achieve a desired velocity at different specific times during the gait cycle. The overall timing pattern of instantaneous cue velocities associated with different gait parameters is conserved across cues that afford different performance accuracies. This timing pattern may be temporally shifted to optimize control. Different cue/gait parameter latencies in our nonadaptation paradigm provide general-case evidence of the independent control of gait parameters previously demonstrated in gait adaptation paradigms.

Proprioceptive feedback contributes to the adaptation toward an economical gait pattern

Humans generally prefer gait patterns with a low metabolic cost, but it is unclear how such patterns are chosen. We have previously proposed that humans may use proprioceptive feedback to identify economical movement patterns. The purpose of the present experiments was to investigate the role of plantarflexor proprioception in the adaptation toward an economical gait pattern. To disrupt proprioception in some trials, we applied noisy vibration (randomly varying between 40-120Hz) over the bilateral Achilles tendons while participants stood quietly or walked on a treadmill. For all 10min walking trials, the treadmill surface was initially level before slowly increasing to a 2.5% incline midway through the trial without participant knowledge. During standing posture, noisy vibration increased sway, indicating decreased proprioception accuracy. While walking on a level surface, vibration did not significantly influence stride period or metabolic rate. However, vibration had clear effects for the first 2-3min after the incline increase; vibration caused participants to walk with shorter stride periods, reduced medial gastrocnemius (MG) activity during mid-stance (30-65% stance), and increased MG activity during late-stance (65-100% stance). Over time, these metrics gradually converged toward the gait pattern without vibration. Likely as a result of this delayed adaptation to the new mechanical context, the metabolic rate when walking uphill was significantly higher in the presence of noisy vibration. These results may be explained by the disruption of proprioception preventing rapid identification of muscle activation patterns which allow the muscles to operate under favorable mechanical conditions with low metabolic demand.

Hip proprioceptive feedback influences the control of mediolateral stability during human walking

Active control of the mediolateral location of the feet is an important component of a stable bipedal walking pattern, although the roles of sensory feedback in this process are unclear. In the present experiments, we tested whether hip abductor proprioception influenced the control of mediolateral gait motion. Participants performed a series of quiet standing and treadmill walking trials. In some trials, 80-Hz vibration was applied intermittently over the right gluteus medius (GM) to evoke artificial proprioceptive feedback. During walking, the GM was vibrated during either right leg stance (to elicit a perception that the pelvis was closer mediolaterally to the stance foot) or swing (to elicit a perception that the swing leg was more adducted). Vibration during quiet standing evoked leftward sway in most participants (13 of 16), as expected from its predicted perceptual effects. Across the 13 participants sensitive to vibration, stance phase vibration caused the contralateral leg to be placed significantly closer to the midline (by ∼2 mm) at the end of the ongoing step. In contrast, swing phase vibration caused the vibrated leg to be placed significantly farther mediolaterally from the midline (by ∼2 mm), whereas the pelvis was held closer to the stance foot (by ∼1 mm). The estimated mediolateral margin of stability was thus decreased by stance phase vibration but increased by swing phase vibration. Although the observed effects of vibration were small, they were consistent with humans monitoring hip proprioceptive feedback while walking to maintain stable mediolateral gait motion.