1
|
Foster JA, Hawk GS, Landy DC, Griffin JT, Bernard AC, Oyler DR, Southall WGS, Muhammad M, Sierra-Arce CR, Mounce SD, Borgida JS, Xiang L, Aneja A. Does Scheduled Low-Dose Short-Term NSAID (Ketorolac) Modulate Cytokine Levels After Orthopaedic Polytrauma? A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Orthop Trauma 2024; 38:358-365. [PMID: 38506517 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether scheduled low-dose, short-term ketorolac modulates cytokine concentrations in orthopaedic polytrauma patients. METHODS DESIGN Secondary analysis of a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Single Level I trauma center from August 2018 to October 2022. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Orthopaedic polytrauma patients between 18 and 75 years with a New Injury Severity Score greater than 9 were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive 15 mg of intravenous ketorolac every 6 hours for up to 5 inpatient days or 2 mL of intravenous saline similarly. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS Daily concentrations of prostaglandin E2 and interleukin (IL)-1a, IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-10. Clinical outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, pulmonary complications, and acute kidney injury. RESULTS Seventy orthopaedic polytrauma patients were enrolled, with 35 participants randomized to the ketorolac group and 35 to the placebo group. The overall IL-10 trend over time was significantly different in the ketorolac group ( P = 0.043). IL-6 was 65.8% higher at enrollment compared to day 3 ( P < 0.001) when aggregated over both groups. There was no significant treatment effect for prostaglandin E2, IL-1a, or IL-1b ( P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Scheduled low-dose, short-term, intravenous ketorolac was associated with significantly different mean trends in IL-10 concentration in orthopaedic polytrauma patients with no significant differences in prostaglandin E2, IL-1a, IL-1b, or IL-6 levels between groups. The treatment did not have an impact on clinical outcomes of hospital or intensive care unit length of stay, pulmonary complications, or acute kidney injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Foster
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Gregory S Hawk
- Dr Bing Zhang Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Jarod T Griffin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew C Bernard
- Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Douglas R Oyler
- Pharmacy Practice & Science Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Wyatt G S Southall
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Maaz Muhammad
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Samuel D Mounce
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; and
| | - Jacob S Borgida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lusha Xiang
- US Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, TX
| | - Arun Aneja
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zeng T, Ye JZ, Qin H, Xu QQ. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:2056-2064. [PMID: 38680254 PMCID: PMC11045511 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i12.2056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, the optimal method for JIA has not yet been developed. AIM To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions. METHODS We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang without restriction for publication date or language at August, 2023. Any RCTs that comparing the effectiveness of NSAIDs with each other or placebo for JIA were included in this network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was used to rank the treatments. P value less than 0.05 was identified as statistically significant. RESULTS We included 8 RCTs (1127 patients) comparing 8 different instructions including meloxicam (0.125 qd and 0.250 qd), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid and 6 mg/kg bid), piroxicam, Naproxen (5.0 mg/kg/d, 7.5 mg/kg/d and 12.5 mg/kg/d), inuprofen (30-40 mg/kg/d), Aspirin (60-80 mg/kg/d, 75 mg/kg/d, and 55 mg/kg/d), Tolmetin (15 mg/kg/d), Rofecoxib, and placebo. There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding ACR Pedi 30 response. The SUCRA shows that celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) ranked first (SUCRA, 88.9%), rofecoxib ranked second (SUCRA, 68.1%), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid) ranked third (SUCRA, 51.0%). There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding adverse events. The SUCRA shows that placebo ranked first (SUCRA, 88.2%), piroxicam ranked second (SUCRA, 60.5%), rofecoxib (0.6 mg/kg qd) ranked third (SUCRA, 56.1%), meloxicam (0.125 mg/kg qd) ranked fourth (SUCRA, 56.1%), and rofecoxib (0.3 mg/kg qd) ranked fifth (SUCRA, 56.1%). CONCLUSION In summary, celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) was found to be the most effective NSAID for treating JIA. Rofecoxib, piroxicam, and meloxicam may be safer options, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger trials with higher quality studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Zeng
- College of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jian-Zhong Ye
- College of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Hui Qin
- College of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Qian-Qian Xu
- College of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ehrnthaller C, Hoxhaj K, Manz K, Zhang Y, Fürmetz J, Böcker W, Linhart C. Preventing Atrophic Long-Bone Nonunion: Retrospective Analysis at a Level I Trauma Center. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2071. [PMID: 38610836 PMCID: PMC11012355 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Among the risk factors for nonunion are unchangeable patient factors such as the type of injury and comorbidities, and factors that can be influenced by the surgeon such as fracture treatment and the postoperative course. While there are numerous studies analyzing unchangeable factors, there is poor evidence for factors that can be affected by the physician. This raises the need to fill the existing knowledge gaps and lay the foundations for future prevention and in-depth treatment strategies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to illuminate knowledge about nonunion in general and uncover the possible reasons for their development; Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 327 patients from 2015 to 2020 from a level I trauma center in Germany. Information about patient characteristics, comorbidities, alcohol and nicotine abuse, fracture classification, type of osteosynthesis, etc., was collected. Matched pair analysis was performed, and statistical testing performed specifically for atrophic long-bone nonunion; Results: The type of osteosynthesis significantly affected the development of nonunion, with plate osteosynthesis being a predictor for nonunion. The use of wire cerclage did not affect the development of nonunion, nor did the use of NSAIDs, smoking, alcohol, osteoporosis and BMI; Conclusion: Knowledge about predictors for nonunion and strategies to avoid them can benefit the medical care of patients, possibly preventing the development of nonunion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ehrnthaller
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
| | - Klevin Hoxhaj
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
| | - Kirsi Manz
- Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IBE), Medizinische Fakultät, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany;
| | - Yunjie Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
| | - Julian Fürmetz
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Straße 8, 82418 Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Böcker
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
| | - Christoph Linhart
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (K.H.); (Y.Z.); (J.F.); (W.B.); (C.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rowe ET, Takagi-Stewart J, Ramtin S, Pennington M, Ilyas AM. The Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Union Rates Following Joint Arthrodesis: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e56312. [PMID: 38629002 PMCID: PMC11020629 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used and prescribed medications because of their important role in reducing inflammation and pain, in addition to their non-addictive properties and safety profiles. However, some studies have documented an association between NSAIDs and delayed union or nonunion of joint arthrodesis procedures due to a potential inhibition of the bone's inflammatory healing response. As a result, some orthopedic surgeons hesitate to prescribe NSAIDs after an arthrodesis procedure. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to review all relevant literature regarding the effect of NSAIDs on union rates after arthrodesis and determine if NSAID therapy increases the risk of non-union in the setting of arthrodesis procedures. The study hypothesis was that NSAIDs would not have a significant effect on the risk of nonunion after arthrodesis. A thorough systematic review of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science identified 3,050 articles to be screened. The variables of interest encompassed demographic factors, procedural details, type and administration of NSAIDs, the number of patients exposed to NSAIDs with and without successful union (case group), as well as the number of patients who did not receive NSAIDs with and without successful union (control group). All the data were analyzed using a maximum likelihood random-effects model. The number of non-union events versus routine healing from each study was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of successful healing after arthrodesis procedures with versus without NSAID therapy. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. NSAID exposure showed an increased risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures; however, this did not meet statistical significance (OR, 1.48; confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 2.30). A sub-analysis of pediatric and adult studies showed a significant increase in non-union risk in adults (OR, 1.717; CI, 1.012 to 2.914) when removing the pediatric cohort (p = 0.045). This meta-analysis provides evidence that NSAIDs can increase the risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures in adults. However, the study did not identify a risk of nonunion, delayed union, or both following arthrodesis procedures in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emerson T Rowe
- Orthopedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - Sina Ramtin
- Hand Department, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Margaret Pennington
- Division of Hand Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Asif M Ilyas
- Orthopedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Razak A, Corman B, Servider J, Mavarez-Martinez A, Jin Z, Mushlin H, Bergese SD. Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:191-200. [PMID: 38155560 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2298824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spine surgery is one of the most common types of surgeries performed in the United States; however, managing postoperative pain following spine surgery has proven to be challenging. Patients with spine pathologies have higher incidences of chronic pain and resultant opioid use and potential for tolerance. Implementing a multimodal plan for postoperative analgesia after spine surgery can lead to enhanced recovery and outcomes. AREAS COVERED This review presents several options for analgesia following spine surgery with an emphasis on multimodal techniques to best aid this specific patient population. In addition to traditional therapeutics, such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and opioids, we discuss intrathecal morphine administration and emerging regional anesthesia techniques. EXPERT OPINION Several adjuncts to improve analgesia following spine surgery are efficacious in the postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides sustained analgesia and can be instilled intraoperatively by the surgical team under direct visualization. Local anesthetics deposited under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist trained in regional techniques also provide the opportunity for single injections or continuous analgesia via an indwelling catheter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Razak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Corman
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - John Servider
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ana Mavarez-Martinez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Harry Mushlin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ryan PM, Scherry H, Pierson R, Wilson CD, Probe RA. NSAID use in orthopedic surgery: A review of current evidence and clinical practice guidelines. J Orthop Res 2024. [PMID: 38273720 DOI: 10.1002/jor.25791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a valuable class of medications for orthopedic surgeons and often play a pivotal role in pain control. However, there are many common stipulations resulting in avoidance of its use in the treatment of musculoskeletal disease. This review summarizes the mechanism of action of NSAIDs as well as provides an overview of commonly used NSAIDs and the differences between them. It provides a concise summary on the osseous effects of NSAIDs with regard to bone healing and heterotopic ossification. Most of all, it serves as a guide or reference for orthopedic providers when counseling patients on the risks and benefits of NSAID use, as it addresses the common stipulations encountered: "It irritates my stomach," "I have a history of bariatric surgery," "I'm already on a blood thinner," "I've had a heart attack," and "I've got kidney problems" and synthesizes both current research and society recommendations regarding safe use and avoidance of NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan Pierson
- Washington University Orthopaedics, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iyer S, Steinhaus ME, Kazarian GS, Zgonis EM, Cunningham ME, Farmer JC, Kim HJ, Lebl DR, Huang RC, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Qureshi S, Girardi FP, Rawlins BA, Beckman JD, Varghese JJ, Muzammil H, Lafage R, Sandhu HS. Intravenous Ketorolac Substantially Reduces Opioid Use and Length of Stay After Lumbar Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:73-80. [PMID: 37737686 PMCID: PMC10872662 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of intravenous ketorolac (IV-K) on hospital opioid use compared with IV-placebo (IV-P) and IV acetaminophen (IV-A). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Controlling postoperative pain while minimizing opioid use after lumbar spinal fusion is an important area of study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing 1 to 2 level lumbar fusions between April 2016 and December 2019 were included. Patients with chronic opioid use, smokers, and those on systemic glucocorticoids or contraindications to study medications were excluded. A block randomization scheme was used, and study personnel, hospital staff, and subjects were blinded to the assignment. Patients were randomized postoperatively. The IV-K group received 15 mg (age > 65) or 30 mg (age < 65) every six hours (q6h) for 48 hours, IV-A received 1000 mg q6h, and IV-P received normal saline q6h for 48 hours. Demographic and surgical details, opioid use in morphine milliequivalents, opioid-related adverse events, and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. The primary outcome was in-hospital opioid use up to 72 hours. RESULTS A total of 171 patients were included (58 IV-K, 55 IV-A, and 58 IV-P) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, with a mean age of 57.1 years. The IV-K group had lower opioid use at 72 hours (173 ± 157 mg) versus IV-A (255 ± 179 mg) and IV-P (299 ± 179 mg; P = 0.000). In terms of opiate use, IV-K was superior to IV-A ( P = 0.025) and IV-P ( P = 0.000) on ITT analysis, although on per-protocol analysis, the difference with IV-A did not reach significance ( P = 0.063). When compared with IV-P, IV-K patients reported significantly lower worst ( P = 0.004), best ( P = 0.001), average ( P = 0.001), and current pain ( P = 0.002) on postoperative day 1, and significantly shorter LOS ( P = 0.009) on ITT analysis. There were no differences in opioid-related adverse events, drain output, clinical outcomes, transfusion rates, or fusion rates. CONCLUSIONS By reducing opioid use, improving pain control on postoperative day 1, and decreasing LOS without increases in complications or pseudarthrosis, IV-K may be an important component of "enhanced recovery after surgery" protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravisht Iyer
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Michael E. Steinhaus
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Gregory S. Kazarian
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evangelia M Zgonis
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Matthew E. Cunningham
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James C. Farmer
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Darren R. Lebl
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Russel C. Huang
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Frank J. Schwab
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz Qureshi
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Federico P. Girardi
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Bernard A. Rawlins
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James D. Beckman
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey J. Varghese
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Hamna Muzammil
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Harvinder S. Sandhu
- Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen B, Pu B, Li S, Gong Y, Dong H. The role of NSAID in mediating the effect of genetically predicted major depressive disorder on osteomyelitis: A Mendelian randomization study. J Affect Disord 2023; 341:62-66. [PMID: 37634817 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteomyelitis and major depressive disorder (MDD) are significant health concerns with potential interconnections. However, the underlying mechanisms linking these conditions remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the potential mediating role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) medication in the association between MDD and the risk of osteomyelitis. METHODS We utilized summary data from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) mediation analysis. Instrumental variables were selected based on genome-wide significance, and instrumental strength was assessed using F-statistics. Univariable and multivariable MR analyses were conducted to estimate causal effects and proportions mediated by NSAID medication. RESULTS The univariable MR analysis revealed significant associations between MDD and osteomyelitis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.874) and between MDD and NSAID medication (OR = 1.36, 95 % CI 1.24-1.49). In the multivariable MR analysis, the direct effect of MDD on osteomyelitis was OR 1.35 (95 % CI: 1.09, 1.67) after adjusting for NSAID medication. The proportion of mediation by NSAID medication was 23 % (95 % CI: 0.05 %, 38.6 %). CONCLUSION This MR study provides evidence for a genetically predicted causal association between MDD, NSAID medication, and osteomyelitis. The findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach in managing individuals with comorbid depression and osteomyelitis, considering the potential risks and benefits of NSAID medication. Future research should address limitations and explore additional mediators and confounding factors to enhance understanding of this complex relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baixing Chen
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bin Pu
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Shaoshuo Li
- Wuxi Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuxi, China.
| | - Yu Gong
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hang Dong
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paladini A, Rawal N, Coca Martinez M, Trifa M, Montero A, Pergolizzi J, Pasqualucci A, Narvaez Tamayo MA, Varrassi G, De Leon Casasola O. Advances in the Management of Acute Postsurgical Pain: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e42974. [PMID: 37671225 PMCID: PMC10475855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the millions of surgeries performed every year around the world, postoperative pain remains prevalent and is often addressed with inadequate or suboptimal treatments. Chronic postsurgical pain is surprisingly prevalent, and its rate varies with the type of surgery, as well as with certain patient characteristics. Thus, better clinical training is needed as well as patient education. As pain can be caused by more than one mechanism, multimodal or balanced postsurgical analgesia is appropriate. Pharmacological agents such as opioid and nonopioid pain relievers, as well as adjuvants and nonpharmacologic approaches, can be combined to provide better and opioid-sparing pain relief. Many specialty societies have guidelines for postoperative pain management that emphasize multimodal postoperative analgesia. These guidelines are particularly helpful when dealing with special populations such as pregnant patients or infants and children. Pediatric pain control, in particular, can be challenging as patients may be unable to communicate their pain levels. A variety of validated assessment tools are available for diagnosis. Related to therapy, most guidelines agree on the fact that codeine should be used with extreme caution in pediatric patients as some may be "rapid metabolizers" and its use may be life-threatening. Prehabilitation is a preoperative approach that prepares patients in advance of elective surgery with conditioning exercises and other interventions to optimize their health. Prehabilitation may have aerobic, strength-training, nutritional, and counseling components. Logistical considerations and degree of patient adherence represent barriers to effective prehabilitation programs. Notwithstanding all this, acute postoperative pain represents a clinical challenge that has not yet been well addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Paladini
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Donahue GS, Hagemeijer NC, Johnson AH. Republication of "How Will the Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Community Respond to the Growing Opioid Epidemic?". FOOT & ANKLE ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 8:24730114231193423. [PMID: 37566702 PMCID: PMC10411272 DOI: 10.1177/24730114231193423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
In the midst of the current opioid crisis, it has become critically important to properly manage opioid-prescribing patterns for the treatment of postoperative pain. There is currently a scarcity of literature specifying prescription and consumption patterns following orthopedic surgery and specifically foot and ankle surgery. Clinical guidelines for postoperative pain management are deficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne Holly Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Menger MM, Stief M, Scheuer C, Rollmann MF, Herath SC, Braun BJ, Ehnert S, Nussler AK, Menger MD, Laschke MW, Histing T. Diclofenac, a NSAID, delays fracture healing in aged mice. Exp Gerontol 2023; 178:112201. [PMID: 37169100 DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as diclofenac, belong to the most prescribed analgesic medication after traumatic injuries. However, there is accumulating evidence that NSAIDs impair fracture healing. Because bone regeneration in aged patients is subject to significant changes in cell differentiation and proliferation as well as a markedly altered pharmacological action of drugs, we herein analyzed the effects of diclofenac on bone healing in aged mice using a stable closed femoral facture model. Thirty-three mice (male n = 14, female n = 19) received a daily intraperitoneal injection of diclofenac (5 mg/kg body weight). Vehicle-treated mice (n = 29; male n = 13, female n = 16) served as controls. Fractured mice femora were analyzed by means of X-ray, biomechanics, micro computed tomography (μCT), histology and Western blotting. Biomechanical analyses revealed a significantly reduced bending stiffness in diclofenac-treated animals at 5 weeks after fracture when compared to vehicle-treated controls. Moreover, the callus tissue in diclofenac-treated aged animals exhibited a significantly reduced amount of bone tissue and higher amounts of fibrous tissue. Further histological analyses demonstrated less lamellar bone after diclofenac treatment, indicating a delay in callus remodeling. This was associated with a decreased number of osteoclasts and an increased expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) during the early phase of fracture healing. These findings indicate that diclofenac delays fracture healing in aged mice by affecting osteogenic growth factor expression and bone formation as well as osteoclast activity and callus remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian M Menger
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Stief
- Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Claudia Scheuer
- Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Mika F Rollmann
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Steven C Herath
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Benedikt J Braun
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ehnert
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas K Nussler
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Michael D Menger
- Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Matthias W Laschke
- Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Tina Histing
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jang HD, Kim EH, Lee JC, Choi SW, Kim HS, Cha JS, Shin BJ. Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Review Update 2022. Asian Spine J 2022; 16:934-946. [PMID: 36573301 PMCID: PMC9827207 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2022.0441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
A vertebral fracture is the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) cause a variety of morbidities and deaths. There are currently few "gold standard treatments" outlined for the management of OVFs in terms of quantity and quality. Conservative treatment is the primary treatment option for OVFs. The treatment of pain includes short-term bed rest, analgesic medication, anti-osteoporotic medications, exercise, and a brace. Numerous reports have been made on studies for vertebral augmentation (VA), including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. There is still debate and controversy about the effectiveness of VA in comparison with conservative treatment. Until more robust data are available, current evidence does not support the routine use of VA for OVF. Despite the fact that the majority of OVFs heal without surgery, 15%-35% of patients with an unstable fracture, persistent intractable back pain, or severely collapsed vertebra that causes a neurologic deficit, kyphosis, or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Because no single approach can guarantee the best surgical outcomes, customized surgical techniques are required. Surgeons must stay current on developments in the osteoporotic spine field and be open to new treatment options. Osteoporosis management and prevention are critical to lowering the risk of future OVFs. Clinical studies on bisphosphonate's effects on fracture healing are lacking. Teriparatide was intermittently administered, which dramatically improved spinal fusion and fracture healing while lowering mortality risk. According to the available literature, there are no standard management methods for OVFs. More multimodal approaches, including conservative and surgical treatment, VA, and medications that treat osteoporosis and promote fracture healing, are required to improve the quality of the majority of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae-Dong Jang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Eung-Ha Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dongkang Hospital, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Jae Chul Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea,Corresponding author: Jae Chul Lee Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04401, Korea Tel: +82-32-621-5114, Fax: +82-32-621-5018, E-mail:
| | - Sung-Woo Choi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hak Soo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joong-Suk Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Joon Shin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tanna NK, Ong T. Pharmacological options for pain control in patients with vertebral fragility fractures. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2022; 8:93-97. [PMID: 36268497 PMCID: PMC9577215 DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This review considers the evidence base and current knowledge for pharmacological treatment options that are available for pain control in patients with vertebral fractures sustained after a low trauma incident. Due care needs to be taken when considering prescribed options for pain control. The decision should be based on first establishing whether the presentation is one of acute severe pain at the time of a new vertebral fragility fracture incident or whether the complaint is one of the debilitating, longer term chronic back pain syndrome, accompanied by a clinical suspicion of a possible new fracture. The article also presents currently debated questions in this important area of clinical and patient care and will be of interest to the readership worldwide.
Collapse
|
14
|
Goodnough LH, Ambrosi TH, Steininger HM, Butler MGK, Hoover MY, Choo H, Van Rysselberghe NL, Bellino MJ, Bishop JA, Gardner MJ, Chan CKF. Cross-species comparisons reveal resistance of human skeletal stem cells to inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:924927. [PMID: 36093067 PMCID: PMC9454294 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.924927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Fracture healing is highly dependent on an early inflammatory response in which prostaglandin production by cyclo-oxygenases (COX) plays a crucial role. Current patient analgesia regimens favor opioids over Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) since the latter have been implicated in delayed fracture healing. While animal studies broadly support a deleterious role of NSAID treatment to bone-regenerative processes, data for human fracture healing remains contradictory. In this study, we prospectively isolated mouse and human skeletal stem cells (SSCs) from fractures and compared the effect of various NSAIDs on their function. We found that osteochondrogenic differentiation of COX2-expressing mouse SSCs was impaired by NSAID treatment. In contrast, human SSCs (hSSC) downregulated COX2 expression during differentiation and showed impaired osteogenic capacity if COX2 was lentivirally overexpressed. Accordingly, short- and long-term treatment of hSSCs with non-selective and selective COX2 inhibitors did not affect colony forming ability, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation potential in vitro. When hSSCs were transplanted ectopically into NSG mice treated with Indomethacin, graft mineralization was unaltered compared to vehicle injected mice. Thus, our results might contribute to understanding species-specific differences in NSAID sensitivity during fracture healing and support emerging clinical data which conflicts with other earlier observations that NSAID administration for post-operative analgesia for treatment of bone fractures are unsafe for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Henry Goodnough
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Thomas H. Ambrosi
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Holly M. Steininger
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - M. Gohazrua K. Butler
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Malachia Y. Hoover
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - HyeRan Choo
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | | | - Michael J. Bellino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Julius A. Bishop
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Michael J. Gardner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Charles K. F. Chan
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stroud S, Katyal T, Gornitzky AL, Swarup I. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on fracture healing in children: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2022; 13:494-502. [PMID: 35633742 PMCID: PMC9125002 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications in the United States. Although they are safe and effective means of analgesia for children with broken bones, there is considerable variation in their clinical use due to persistent concerns about their potentially adverse effect on fracture healing.
AIM To assess whether NSAID exposure is a risk factor for fracture nonunion in children.
METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature reporting the effect of NSAIDs on bone healing. We included all clinical studies that reported on adverse bone healing complications in children with respect to NSAID exposure. The outcomes of interest were delayed union or nonunion. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies. A final table was constructed summarizing the available evidence.
RESULTS A total of 120 articles were identified and screened, of which 6 articles were included for final review. Nonunion in children is extremely rare; among the studies included, there were 2011 nonunions among 238822 fractures (0.84%). None of the included studies documented an increased risk of nonunion or delayed bone healing in those children who are treated with NSAIDs in the immediate post-injury or peri-operative time period. Additionally, children are likely to take these medications for only a few days after injury or surgery, further decreasing their risk of adverse side-effects.
CONCLUSION This systematic review suggests that NSAIDS can be safely prescribed to pediatric orthopaedic patients absent other contraindications without concern for increased risk of fracture non-union or delayed bone healing. Additional prospective studies are needed focusing on higher risk fractures and elective orthopaedic procedures such as osteotomies and spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stroud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Toshali Katyal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Benioff Children’s Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Alex L Gornitzky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States
| | - Ishaan Swarup
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA 94609, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dinesh TK, Shetty A, Dhyani VS, T S S, Dsouza KJ. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on well-being and work-related stress in the financial sector: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 2022; 11:79. [PMID: 35477582 PMCID: PMC9047319 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-01956-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Work-related stress is a common phenomenon, often noticed in the employees of the finance sector. It mirrors counter effects on the wellness of employees, their mental well-being, and physical health. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) raise awareness and attention to the present moment experiences by adopting coping skills. It is necessary to promote employee well-being and reduce work-related stress; hence, the need arises to associate between the level of mindfulness, employee well-being, and work-related stress. A systematic review on the effectiveness of MBIs in the finance sector is necessary to facilitate evidence for the future utility to reduce work-related stress and promote employee well-being. METHODS In this review, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized control trials, cohort, and cross-sectional and case-control studies that assess the effectiveness of MBIs on the employees in the finance sector will be considered. We propose to perform a literature search which will be conducted from the years 2000 to 2021 on CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search terms will include controlled and accessible terms such as mindfulness-based interventions, mindfulness training, workplace, employees, workers, well-being, employee wellness, occupational health, and finance sector. The outcomes will include the effect on employee well-being and reduction in work-related stress. Two researchers will independently conduct the screening and data extraction and assess the risk of bias. Based on the availability of data, a meta-analysis will also be performed. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines. "Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews" will be used to assess the quality of this review. DISCUSSION The review attempts to methodically analyse the effectiveness of MBIs among finance sector employees. It will foster to facilitate a detailed description and evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of MBIs on improving work-related stress, mindful awareness, and employee wellness and well-being in employees in the finance sector. The current study will provide an evidence base to researchers, academicians, and practitioners in the selection of mindfulness-based therapies for employees in the finance sector. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021249782.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tantri Keerthi Dinesh
- Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Ankitha Shetty
- Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Vijay Shree Dhyani
- Public Health Evidence South Asia (PHESA), Prasanna School of Public Health (PSPH), Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Shwetha T S
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Komal Jenifer Dsouza
- Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
How Do Drugs Affect the Skeleton? Implications for Forensic Anthropology. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11040524. [PMID: 35453723 PMCID: PMC9030599 DOI: 10.3390/biology11040524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Simple Summary Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly by assessing age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry and any unique identifying features. Whilst methods have been established to create this biological profile of the skeleton, these may be influenced by a number of factors. This paper, for the first time, provides an overview from a reading of the clinical and pharmacological literature to explore whether the intake of drugs can affect the skeleton and whether these may have implications for forensic anthropology casework. In effect, drugs such as tobacco, heroin, and prescription medications can alter bone mineral density, can increase the risk of fractures, destroy bone and changes to the dentition. By considering how drugs can affect the skeleton, forensic anthropologists can be aware of this when attempting to identify the deceased. Abstract Forensic anthropologists rely on a number of parameters when analyzing human skeletal remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry or population affinity, and any unique identifying features. During the examination of human remains, it is important to be aware that the skeletal features considered when applying anthropological methods may be influenced and modified by a number of factors, and particular to this article, prescription drugs (including medical and non-medical use) and other commonly used drugs. In view of this, this paper aims to review the medical, clinical and pharmacological literature to enable an assessment of those drug groups that as side effects have the potential to have an adverse effect on the skeleton, and explore whether or not they can influence the estimation of age-at-death, sex and other indicators of the biological profile. Moreover, it may be that the observation of certain alterations or inconsistencies in the skeleton may relate to the use of drugs or medication, and this in turn may help narrow down the list of missing persons to which a set of human remains could belong. The information gathered from the clinical and medical literature has been extracted with a forensic anthropological perspective and provides an awareness on how several drugs, such as opioids, cocaine, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, tobacco and others have notable effects on bone. Through different mechanisms, drugs can alter bone mineral density, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, increase the risk of fractures, osteonecrosis, and oral changes. Not much has been written on the influence of drugs on the skeleton from the forensic anthropological practitioner perspective; and this review, in spite of its limitations and the requirement of further research, aims to investigate the current knowledge of the possible effects of both prescription and recreational drugs on bones, contributing to providing a better awareness in forensic anthropological practice and assisting in the identification process of the deceased.
Collapse
|
18
|
Immune Modulatory Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in the Perioperative Period and Their Consequence on Postoperative Outcome. Anesthesiology 2022; 136:843-860. [PMID: 35180291 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are among the most commonly administered drugs in the perioperative period due to their prominent role in pain management. However, they potentially have perioperative consequences due to immune-modulating effects through the inhibition of prostanoid synthesis, thereby affecting the levels of various cytokines. These effects may have a direct impact on the postoperative outcome of patients since the immune system aims to restore homeostasis and plays an indispensable role in regeneration and repair. By affecting the immune response, consequences can be expected on various organ systems. This narrative review aims to highlight these potential immune system-related consequences, which include systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome, immediate and persistent postoperative pain, effects on oncological and neurologic outcome, and wound, anastomotic, and bone healing.
Collapse
|
19
|
Reduction of Opioid Consumption After Outpatient Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeries Using a Multimodal Pain Protocol. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e327-e335. [PMID: 34723860 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-01417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Because of the dearth of literature in the orthopaedic trauma population, we aimed to analyze how a multimodal pain protocol after outpatient surgery affects opioid consumption, pain scores, and patient satisfaction. METHODS This was a cohort study with a historical control at an urban level 1 trauma center. Forty consecutive outpatients were given a peripheral nerve block and a multimodal pain protocol between September 2019 and March 2020 and compared with 70 consecutive preprotocol patients who received a peripheral nerve block and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. The primary outcome was morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed. Our secondary aims were pain scores and satisfaction. RESULTS Patients in the protocol were younger (36.45 versus 45.09 years, P = 0.007), butthere was no difference in sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists, or surgical duration. There was a 59% reduction in opioids consumed in the first 4 days after surgery (3.83 MME versus 9.29 MME, P < 0.001). At the postoperative day-14 time point, protocol patients consumed a total of 5.59 MMEs, which is 40% less than just the first 4 days of the preprotocol (P = 0.02). Protocol patients assigned a higher rating of "least pain" on postoperative day 1 (1.24 versus 0.52, P = 0.04) but had higher satisfaction scores on day 1 (9.68 versus 8.54, P < 0.001) and day 2 (9.66 versus 8.61, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Implementation of a multimodal pain management protocol after outpatient orthopaedic trauma surgeries reduced opioid consumption by >50% in the first 4 days postoperatively. Additional studies are needed to refine the multimodal pain protocol used in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cheung CK, Adeola JO, Beutler SS, Urman RD. Postoperative Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery Pathways. J Pain Res 2022; 15:123-135. [PMID: 35058714 PMCID: PMC8765537 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s231774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Postoperative pain is a common but often inadequately treated condition. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) are increasingly being utilized to standardize perioperative care and improve outcomes. ERPs employ multimodal postoperative pain management strategies that minimize opioid use and promote recovery. While traditional opioid medications continue to play an important role in the treatment of postoperative pain, ERPs also rely on a wide range of non-opioid pharmacologic therapies as well as regional anesthesia techniques to manage pain in the postoperative setting. The evidence for the use of these interventions continues to evolve rapidly given the increasing focus on enhanced postoperative recovery. This article reviews the current evidence and knowledge gaps pertaining to commonly utilized modalities for postoperative pain management in ERPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher K Cheung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Janet O Adeola
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sascha S Beutler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Correspondence: Richard D Urman Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, CWN L1, Boston, MA, 02115, USATel +1 617 732 8210Fax +1 617 264 6841 Email
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Merkely G, Chisari E, Lola Rosso C, Lattermann C. Do Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Have a Deleterious Effect on Cartilage Repair? A Systematic Review. Cartilage 2021; 13:326S-341S. [PMID: 31216865 PMCID: PMC8808836 DOI: 10.1177/1947603519855770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to systematically review the available evidence regarding any plausible deleterious effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on chondrocytes, chondrocyte differentiation, and allograft or autograft incorporation after cartilage repair procedures. DESIGN Three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) were screened for eligible studies: investigating the effects of NSAIDs on chondrocytes, chondrogenic differentiation, or allograft/autograft incorporation. This evaluation included studies of any level of evidence, written in English, reporting clinical or preclinical results, published in peer review journals and dealing with our topic. All articles evaluating the effects of NSAIDs on either osteoarthritic (OA) chondrocyte samples or OA chondrocyte models were excluded. Moreover, articles about bone healing in which allograft or autograft incorporation was not investigated were also excluded. Methodologic quality assessment was performed for in vivo animal studies according to ARRIVE guidelines, and risk of bias of each included study was identified using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included in the review: 4 in vitro studies, 13 animal studies, and 1 human study. According to these studies NSAIDs have no detrimental effect on healthy mature chondrocytes; however, these drugs influence chondrocyte differentiation and graft incorporation and therefore may interfere with chondrogenesis and incorporation after transplantation of chondrocytes or osteochondral grafts. CONCLUSION The use of NSAIDs, systemic or local, after cartilage repair procedures should be avoided unless a substantial clinical benefit would otherwise be withheld from the patient. More human studies are needed to analyze the effect of NSAIDs on cartilage repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gergo Merkely
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Division of Sports Medicine, Center for Cartilage Repair, Brigham and Women’s
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Traumatology, Semmelweis
University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Emanuele Chisari
- Department of General Surgery and
Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University
Hospital Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Christian Lattermann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Division of Sports Medicine, Center for Cartilage Repair, Brigham and Women’s
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Oliver WM, Searle HKC, Ng ZH, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD. Factors associated with humeral shaft nonunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2283-2295. [PMID: 33636324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary aim was to identify patient and injury factors independently associated with humeral diaphyseal fracture nonunion after nonoperative management. The secondary aim was to determine the effect of management (operative/nonoperative) on nonunion. METHODS From 2008-2017, a total of 734 humeral shaft fractures (732 consecutive skeletally mature patients) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Follow-up was available for 663 fractures (662 patients, 90%) that formed the study cohort. Patient and injury characteristics were recorded. There were 523 patients (79%) managed nonoperatively and 139 (21%) managed operatively. Outcome (union/nonunion) was determined from medical records and radiographs. RESULTS The median age at injury was 57 (range 16-96) years and 54% (n = 359/662) were female. Median follow-up was 5 (1.2-74) months. Nonunion occurred in 22.7% (n = 119/524) of nonoperatively managed injuries. Multivariate analysis demonstrated preinjury nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; odds ratio [OR] 20.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-199.48; P = .009) and glenohumeral arthritis (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03-5.77; P = .043) were independently associated with an increased risk of nonunion. Operative fixation was independently associated with a lower risk of nonunion (2.9%, n = 4/139) compared with nonoperative management (OR for nonoperative/operative management 9.91, 95% CI 3.25-30.23; P < .001). Based on these findings, 5 patients would need to undergo primary operative fixation in order to avoid 1 nonunion. CONCLUSIONS Preinjury NSAIDs and glenohumeral arthritis were independently associated with nonunion following nonoperative management of a humeral diaphyseal fracture. Operative fixation was the independent factor most strongly associated with a lower risk of nonunion. Targeting early operative fixation to at-risk patients may reduce the rate of nonunion and the morbidity associated with delayed definitive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Oliver
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
| | - Henry K C Searle
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Zhan Herr Ng
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Samuel G Molyneux
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Timothy O White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Nicholas D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| | - Andrew D Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics - Trauma Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK; Centre for Population and Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Waelkens P, Alsabbagh E, Sauter A, Joshi GP, Beloeil H. Pain management after complex spine surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38:985-994. [PMID: 34397527 PMCID: PMC8373453 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex spinal procedures are associated with intense pain in the postoperative period. Adequate peri-operative pain management has been shown to correlate with improved outcomes including early ambulation and early discharge. OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after complex spine surgery. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES A systematic review using the PROcedure SPECific postoperative pain managemenT methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published in the English language from January 2008 to April 2020 assessing postoperative pain after complex spine surgery using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases. RESULTS Out of 111 eligible studies identified, 31 randomised controlled trials and four systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative and intra-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 specific-inhibitors or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intravenous ketamine infusion and regional analgesia techniques including epidural analgesia using local anaesthetics with or without opioids. Limited evidence was found for local wound infiltration, intrathecal and epidural opioids, erector spinae plane block, thoracolumbar interfascial plane block, intravenous lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS The analgesic regimen for complex spine surgery should include pre-operative or intra-operative paracetamol and COX-2 specific inhibitors or NSAIDs, continued postoperatively with opioids used as rescue analgesics. Other recommendations are intra-operative ketamine and epidural analgesia using local anaesthetics with or without opioids. Although there is procedure-specific evidence in favour of intra-operative methadone, it is not recommended as it was compared with shorter-acting opioids and due to its limited safety profile. Furthermore, the methadone studies did not use non-opioid analgesics, which should be the primary analgesics to ultimately reduce overall opioid requirements, including methadone. Further qualitative randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of these recommended analgesics on postoperative pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Waelkens
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology, KU Leuven and University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (PW), CHU Rennes, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Rennes, France (EA), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (AS), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (AS), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA (GPJ), the University Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, INRA, CIC 1414 NuMeCan, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Rennes, France (HB)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wildemann B, Ignatius A, Leung F, Taitsman LA, Smith RM, Pesántez R, Stoddart MJ, Richards RG, Jupiter JB. Non-union bone fractures. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7:57. [PMID: 34354083 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00289-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The human skeleton has remarkable regenerative properties, being one of the few structures in the body that can heal by recreating its normal cellular composition, orientation and mechanical strength. When the healing process of a fractured bone fails owing to inadequate immobilization, failed surgical intervention, insufficient biological response or infection, the outcome after a prolonged period of no healing is defined as non-union. Non-union represents a chronic medical condition not only affecting function but also potentially impacting the individual's psychosocial and economic well-being. This Primer provides the reader with an in-depth understanding of our contemporary knowledge regarding the important features to be considered when faced with non-union. The normal mechanisms involved in bone healing and the factors that disrupt the normal signalling mechanisms are addressed. Epidemiological considerations and advances in the diagnosis and surgical therapy of non-union are highlighted and the need for greater efforts in basic, translational and clinical research are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt Wildemann
- Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. .,Julius Wolff Institute and BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anita Ignatius
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University, Ulm, Baden Württemberg, Germany
| | - Frankie Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Lisa A Taitsman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - R Malcolm Smith
- Orthopedic trauma service, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Rodrigo Pesántez
- Departamento de Ortopedia Y Traumatología Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá - Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Jesse B Jupiter
- Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Massachussets General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Moussalem C, Ftouni L, Abou Mrad Z, Bsat S, Houshiemy M, Alomari S, Omeis I. Negative pharmacological effect on spine fusion: A narrative review of the literature of evidence-based treatment. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 207:106799. [PMID: 34304068 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Spine fusion surgery is commonly performed for diverse indications, the most frequent one being degenerative spine diseases. Despite the growing importance of this surgery, there is limited evidence concerning the effects of drugs on the process of spine fusion and healing. While asymptomatic sometimes, nonunion of the spine can have tremendous repercussions on the patients' quality of life and the healthcare system rendering it an "expensive complication". This literature review identifies the role of some perioperative drugs in spine fusion and reveals their potential role in pseudarthrosis of the spine. This review also benefits spine surgeons looking for current evidence-based practices. We reviewed the data related to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, vancomycin, bisphosphonates, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), pregabalin, and opioids. From the available experimental and clinical studies, we conclude that bisphosphonates might positively influence the process of spine fusion, while steroids and vancomycin have shown variable effects, and the remaining medications likely disturb healing and union of the spine. We recommend spine surgeons be cautious about the drugs they resort to in the critical perioperative period until further clinical studies prove which drugs are safe to be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Moussalem
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Louna Ftouni
- Faculty of Medicine, Beirut Arab University, P.O. Box 11-5020, Riad El Solh 1107 2809, Lebanon.
| | - Zaki Abou Mrad
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Shadi Bsat
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Mohamad Houshiemy
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Safwan Alomari
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| | - Ibrahim Omeis
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aliuskevicius M, Østgaard SE, Vestergaard P, Rasmussen S. The Influence of Ibuprofen on the Healing of Nonsurgically Treated Colles' Fractures. Orthopedics 2021; 44:105-110. [PMID: 33373464 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20201216-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can delay bone healing. This knowledge is mainly derived from retrospective and animal studies. The authors therefore conducted a human study to investigate whether ibuprofen affects radiological, functional, densitometrical, and biochemical outcomes following a Colles' fracture, as well as the analgesic effect of ibuprofen. This was a single-center, triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a total of 96 patients. All of the patients received basic treatment with 1000 mg of acetaminophen 4 times daily. The placebo group received a placebo for 7 days. The 3-day ibuprofen group received 600 mg of ibuprofen 3 times daily for the first 3 days and a placebo for the following 4 days. The 7-day ibuprofen group received ibuprofen 3 times daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was the fragment migration for a period of 5 weeks. The secondary outcomes were changes in the wrist's range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; bone mineral density of the injured wrist; changes in serum CrossLaps (Roche Diagnostics) and osteocalcin; and analgesic effects. Analyses were performed according to an intention-to-treat approach. No significant differences in radiological migration or functional, densitometrical, and biochemical effects were established among the treatment groups (.06≤P≤.9). During the first 3 days, the pain score was lower (P=.02) in the ibuprofen groups than in the placebo group. The findings of this study offer an indication for ibuprofen as a bone-safe analgesic treatment after Colles' fracture and may be translated into other fields of cancellous bone fracture treatment. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):105-110.].
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used medications due to their prescription and nonprescription availability, various dosage formulations, and therapeutic efficacy. Although NSAIDs have many known benefits, their effects on gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, bone, and renal physiology limit their widespread and long-term use. This article provides an update on dosage formulations, product availability, and pertinent adverse effects and warnings regarding the use of NSAIDs, with an emphasis on nonaspirin NSAIDs.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanni KA, Truong CB, Johnson BS, Qian J. Comparative effectiveness and safety of eribulin in advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103375. [PMID: 34087344 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Eribulin is one of the few recommended chemotherapies for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We systematically searched MEDLINE Ovid, Cochrane Library, IPA, CINAHL, Web of Science and ProQuest Dissertations for studies evaluating eribulin versus non-eribulin regimens in LABC/MBC till January 15, 2021. Primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE), respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed or random-effects meta-analyses. Of 1183 publications identified, 13 studies were included in this review. Eribulin based therapy showed significantly increased OS [HR (95 % CI) = 0.77 (0.67-0.88)] compared to non-eribulin in both main and sensitivity analyses, as well as subgroup analyses according to receptor expression and line of therapy. Incidence of all-grade neutropenia was the only significant AE in eribulin than non-eribulin groups. Eribulin has a manageable toxicity profile and provides significant survival benefit in LABC/MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaniz Afroz Tanni
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
| | - Cong Bang Truong
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
| | - Brandon S Johnson
- Spencer Cancer Center, East Alabama Medical Center, Opelika, AL 36801, USA.
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schug SA. Do NSAIDs Really Interfere with Healing after Surgery? J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10112359. [PMID: 34072128 PMCID: PMC8198282 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Perioperative analgesia should be multimodal to improve pain relief, reduce opioid use and thereby adverse effects impairing recovery. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an important non-opioid component of this approach. However, besides potential other adverse effects, there has been a longstanding discussion on the potentially harmful effects of NSAIDs on healing after surgery and trauma. This review describes current knowledge of the effects of NSAIDs on healing of bones, cartilage, soft tissue, wounds, flaps and enteral anastomoses. Overall, animal data suggest some potentially harmful effects, but are contradictory in most areas studied. Human data are limited and of poor quality; in particular, there are only very few good randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but many cohort studies with potential for significant confounding factors influencing the results. The limited human data available are not precluding the use of NSAIDs postoperatively, in particular, short-term for less than 2 weeks. However, well-designed and large RCTs are required to permit definitive answers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan A Schug
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Medical School, University of Western Australia, 6000 Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ahn H, Park YK. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J 2021; 20:41. [PMID: 33952276 PMCID: PMC8101184 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-021-00698-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence demonstrate that sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and bone health are related; however, there has been only a few reviews on the link between SSBs and bone health. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association between SSBs consumption and bone health in chidren and adults. METHODS Relevant studies of SSBs and bone health published up to 15 March 2021 were searched using PubMed, the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and a reference search. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup analyses were performed to identify whether effects were modified by age, sex, measured skeletal sites, type of SSBs, and SSBs intake questionnaire. RESULTS Twenty-six publications including 124,691 participants were selected on the review. The results from this meta-analysis showed a significant inverse association between SSBs intake and bone mineral density (BMD) in adults (ES: -0.66, 95% CI: - 1.01, - 0.31, n = 4312). Eighteen of the 20 studies included in the qualitative-only review in children and adults supported the findings from the meta-analysis. When subgroup analysis was performed according to skeletal site, a large effect was found on whole body BMD (ES: -0.97, 95% CI: - 1.54, - 0.40). There was a moderate effect on BMD in females (ES: -0.50, 95% CI: - 0.87, - 0.13). There was a moderate or large effect on BMD in individuals aged under 50 years (under 30 years: ES: -0.57, 95% CI: - 0.97, - 0.17; 30 to 50 years: ES: -1.33, 95% CI: - 1.72, - 0.93). High consumption of carbonated beverages had a moderate effect on BMD (ES: -0.73, 95% CI: - 1.12, - 0.35). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed that SSBs consumption such as carbonated beverages were inversely related to BMD in adults. Qualitative review supported the results of meta-analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION This review was registered in the PROSPERO database under identifier CRD42020164428 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyejin Ahn
- Department of Gerontology (AgeTech-Service Convergence Major), Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Kyoung Park
- Department of Medical Nutrition (AgeTech-Service Convergence Major), Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 17104 Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Medical Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Obesity is associated with less favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:1483-1493. [PMID: 33474626 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06435-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature comparing the postoperative outcomes after following hip arthroscopy in obese and non-obese patients. METHODS Studies comparing the outcomes following hip arthroscopy of obese and non-obese patients were systematically identified via a computer-assisted literature search of Pubmed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing the outcome of hip arthroscopy in different body mass index (BMI) groups were included. Data including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), revision arthroscopy rate, conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and complications were collected. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assess the quality of each study quality. The effect of heterogeneity was quantified by calculating the I2 value. RESULTS A total of eight studies were finally included in the qualitative analysis, and three studies of high quality involving 373 hips were included in the quantitative assessment. All the studies defined obesity as a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2. The modified Harris Hip Score and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score were 5.1 (95% CI 1.1-9.1) and 9.0 (95% CI 5.0-13.1) points lower, respectively, in the obese group than in the non-obese group. The pooled odds ratios were 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-2.7) for revision arthroscopy, 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.6) for conversion to THA, and 3.2 (95% CI 1.2-8.6 for complications in favor of the non-obese group. The heterogeneity was low in all outcome assessments (I2 0-18%). CONCLUSION Obese patients had significantly lower PROMs than non-obese patients following hip arthroscopic surgery, and the THA conversion and complication rates were 2.4 times and 3.2 times higher, respectively. Understanding the effect of obesity on hip arthroscopy will allow appropriate surgical indications for surgery to be further refined and help obese patients to understand their individual risk profile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review of Level III-IV studies, Level IV.
Collapse
|
32
|
Qiu J, Li C, Dong Z, Wang J. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for low bone density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord 2021; 21:65. [PMID: 33849514 PMCID: PMC8045181 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00728-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review aimed to investigate whether diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for low bone density, as this might be important and necessary for doctors specialized in treating patients with low bone density. METHODS PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and SciELO were searched for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies that investigated the effects of diabetes mellitus on bone mineral density till January 2020. Data screening and extraction are done independently, whereas the methodological quality of the studies was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS A total of 14 studies that met the eligibility criteria including 24,340 participants were enrolled. The overall quality of the studies had a scale of over 6 points. The overall odds ratio (OR) regarding the risk of diabetes mellitus in low bone density patients was 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI)0.80-1.79, P = 0.30], and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OR = 0.69 [0.11, 4.55], P = 0.70). Subgroup analysis revealed that whether females or males, developed or developing countries, T2DM, studies after 2015, and quality over 7 points (all P values > 0.05) showed no significant differences with the risk of low bone density, except type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (OR = 3.83 [1.64, 8.96], P = 0.002), and studies before 2015 (OR = 1.76 [1.06, 2.92], P = 0.03), and quality below 7 points (OR = 2.27 [1.50, 3.43], P = 0.0001). Funnel plot showed no significant asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS These findings revealed no relationship between T2DM and low bone density, and also, the evidence between T1DM and low bone density is inadequate, requiring further analysis of well-designed cohort studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingying Qiu
- Department of Endocrinology, Shengzhou People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Shengzhou Branch, Zhejiang, China), No. 666, Dangui Road, Shengzhou, 312400 Zhejiang China
| | - Chengjiang Li
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang China
| | - Zhichun Dong
- Department of Endocrinology, Shengzhou People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Shengzhou Branch, Zhejiang, China), No. 666, Dangui Road, Shengzhou, 312400 Zhejiang China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Endocrinology, Shengzhou People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Shengzhou Branch, Zhejiang, China), No. 666, Dangui Road, Shengzhou, 312400 Zhejiang China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Licina A, Silvers A, Laughlin H, Russell J, Wan C. Pathway for enhanced recovery after spinal surgery-a systematic review of evidence for use of individual components. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:74. [PMID: 33691620 PMCID: PMC7944908 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01281-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS) has shown promising improvements in clinical and economical outcomes. We have proposed an ERSS pathway based on available evidence. We aimed to delineate the clinical efficacy of individual pathway components in ERSS through a systematic narrative review. Methods We included systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled studies, and observational studies in adults and pediatric patients evaluating any one of the 22 pre-defined components. Our primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). Following databases (1990 onwards) were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two authors screened the citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis was provided. We constructed Evidence Profile (EP) tables for each component of the pathway, where appropriate information was available. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta-analyses. GRADE system was used to classify confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of the pathway. Results We identified 5423 relevant studies excluding duplicates as relating to the 22 pre-defined components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. We included 664 studies in the systematic review. We identified specific evidence within the context of spinal surgery for 14/22 proposed components. Evidence was summarized in EP tables where suitable. We performed thematic synthesis without EP for 6/22 elements. We identified appropriate societal guidelines for the remainder of the components. Conclusions We identified the following components with high quality of evidence as per GRADE system: pre-emptive analgesia, peri-operative blood conservation (antifibrinolytic use), surgical site preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis. There was moderate level of evidence for implementation of prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery, multimodal perioperative analgesia, intravenous lignocaine and ketamine use as well as early mobilization. This review allows for the first formalized evidence-based unified protocol in the field of ERSS. Further studies validating the multimodal ERSS framework are essential to guide the future evolution of care in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01281-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Licina
- Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
| | - Andrew Silvers
- Monash Health, Clayton, Australia, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Russell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crispin Wan
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rabbani G, Shariful Islam SM, Rahman MA, Amin N, Marzan B, Robin RC, Alif SM. Pre-existing COPD is associated with an increased risk of mortality and severity in COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 15:705-716. [DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1866547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Golam Rabbani
- Bangladesh Betar (Radio), Ministry of Information, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | - Muhammad Aziz Rahman
- School of Health, Federation University Australia, Berwick, Australia
- Australian Institute of Primary Care and Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nuhu Amin
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Bushra Marzan
- School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | | | - Sheikh M. Alif
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jang HD, Kim EH, Lee JC, Choi SW, Kim K, Shin BJ. Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review. Asian Spine J 2020; 14:898-909. [PMID: 33373513 PMCID: PMC7788360 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and can increase morbidity and mortality. To date, the guidelines for managing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are limited in quantity and quality, and there is no gold standard treatment for these fractures. Conservative treatment is considered the primary treatment option for OVFs and includes pain relief through shortterm bed rest, analgesics, antiosteoporotic drugs, exercise, and braces. Studies on vertebral augmentation (VA) including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely reported, but there is still debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness of VA when compared with conservative treatment, and the routine use of VA for OVF is not supported by current evidence. Although most OVFs heal well, approximately 15%-35% of patients with unstable fractures, chronic intractable back pain, severely collapsed vertebra (leading to neurological deficits and kyphosis), or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Given that there is no single technique for optimizing surgical outcomes in OVFs, tailored surgical techniques are needed. Surgeons need to pay attention to advances in osteoporotic spinal surgery and should be open to novel thoughts and techniques. Prevention and management of osteoporosis is the key element in reducing the risk of subsequent OVFs. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are mainstay drugs for improving fracture healing in OVF. The effects of bisphosphonates on fracture healing have not been clinically evaluated. The intermittent administration of teriparatide significantly enhanced spinal fusion and fracture healing and reduced mortality risk. Based on the current literature, there is still a lack of standard management strategies for OVF. There is a need for greater efforts through multimodal approaches including conservative treatment, surgery, osteoporosis treatment, and drugs that promote fracture healing to improve the quality of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae-Dong Jang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Eung-Ha Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Jae Chul Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Woo Choi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyungbum Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Byung-Joon Shin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hung KC, Lin YT, Chen KH, Wang LK, Chen JY, Chang YJ, Wu SC, Chiang MH, Sun CK. The Effect of Perioperative Vitamin C on Postoperative Analgesic Consumption: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2020; 12:E3109. [PMID: 33053814 PMCID: PMC7600013 DOI: 10.3390/nu12103109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Because the analgesic effect of vitamin C against acute pain remains poorly addressed, this meta-analysis aimed at investigating its effectiveness against acute postoperative pain. A total of seven randomized controlled trials with placebo/normal controls were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. Pooled analysis showed a lower pain score (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.68, 95% CI: -1.01 to -0.36, p < 0.0001; I2 = 57%) and a lower morphine consumption (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -2.44 mg, 95% CI: -4.03 to -0.86, p = 0.003; I2 = 52%) in the vitamin group than that in the placebo group within postoperative 1-2 h. At postoperative 24 h, a lower pain score (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.19, p = 0.005; I2 = 81%) and lower morphine consumption (WMD = -6.74 mg, 95% CI: -9.63 to -3.84, p < 0.00001; I2 = 85%) were also noted in the vitamin group. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant reductions in pain severity and morphine requirement immediately (1-2 h) and 24 h after surgery for patients receiving intravenous vitamin C but not in the oral subgroup. These findings showed significant reductions in pain score and opioid requirement up to postoperative 24 h, respectively, suggesting the effectiveness of perioperative vitamin C use. Further large-scale trials are warranted to elucidate its optimal intravenous dosage and effectiveness against chronic pain in the postoperative pain control setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; (K.-C.H.); (Y.-T.L.); (L.-K.W.); (J.-Y.C.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City 71710, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Tsung Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; (K.-C.H.); (Y.-T.L.); (L.-K.W.); (J.-Y.C.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Center of General Education, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City 71710, Taiwan
| | - Kee-Hsin Chen
- Post-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11042, Taiwan;
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11042, Taiwan
- Center for Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11042, Taiwan
- Evidence-Based Knowledge Translation Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11042, Taiwan
| | - Li-Kai Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; (K.-C.H.); (Y.-T.L.); (L.-K.W.); (J.-Y.C.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City 71710, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Yin Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; (K.-C.H.); (Y.-T.L.); (L.-K.W.); (J.-Y.C.); (Y.-J.C.)
- Department of the Senior Citizen Service Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City 71710, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Jen Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; (K.-C.H.); (Y.-T.L.); (L.-K.W.); (J.-Y.C.); (Y.-J.C.)
- College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 71101, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Chun Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City 83301, Taiwan;
| | - Min-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City 83301, Taiwan;
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Opioid-free spine surgery: a prospective study of 244 consecutive cases by a single surgeon. Spine J 2020; 20:1176-1183. [PMID: 32320863 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT There have been no reported efforts to eliminate opioid use for elective spine surgery, despite its well-known drawbacks. PURPOSE We sought to test the hypothesis that opioid-free elective spine surgery, including lumbar fusions, can be performed with satisfactory pain control. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING This study analyzes prospectively collected data from a single surgeon's patients who were enrolled into an institutional spine registry. PATIENT SAMPLE We enrolled every consecutive surgical patient of author RAB between January 1, 2018 and July 13, 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES The postsurgical opioid use, pain scores, emergency room visits, and readmissions were tracked. METHODS We developed a comprehensive program for opioid-free pain control after elective spine surgery. In the initial stage, opioids were given "PRN" only, while in the second stage, they were avoided altogether. Student's t tests were performed to compare pain scores, and regression analyses were performed to understand drivers of opioid use and pain. RESULTS Two hundred forty-four patients were studied, a third of whom underwent lumbar fusions. In the initial stage, 47% of patients took no opioids from recovery room departure until 1-month follow-up. During the second stage, 88% of patients took no opioids during that period. Pain scores were satisfactory, and there was no association between postoperative opioid use and either procedural invasiveness or pain scores. However, preoperative opioid use was associated with a nearly fivefold increased risk of postoperative use. Ninety-three percent of lumbar fusion patients who were opioid-free before surgery did not take a single opioid in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION Opioid-free elective spine surgery, including lumbar fusions, is feasible and effective. We suggest that opioid-free spine surgery be offered to patients who are opioid-naïve or who can be weaned off before the operation.
Collapse
|
38
|
Tucker WA, Birt MC, Heddings AA, Horton GA. The Effect of Postoperative Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Nonunion Rates in Long Bone Fractures. Orthopedics 2020; 43:221-227. [PMID: 32379334 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200428-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with non-union in long bone fractures has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether NSAID exposure results in increased risk of non-union in operatively treated long bone fractures. The authors used International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients under a single-payer private insurance with operatively treated humeral shaft, tibial shaft, and subtrochanteric femur fractures from a large database. Patients were divided into cohorts based on NSAID use in the immediate postoperative period, and nonunion rates were compared. A cost analysis and a multivariate analysis were performed. Between 2007 and 2016, a total of 5310 tibial shaft, 3947 humeral shaft, and 8432 subtrochanteric femur fractures underwent operative fixation. Patients used NSAIDs in the first 90 days postoperatively in 900 tibial shaft, 694 humeral shaft, and 967 subtrochanteric femur fractures. In these patients, nonunion rates were 18.8%, 17.4%, and 10.4%, respectively. When no NSAIDs were used, the rates were 11.4%, 10.1%, and 4.6% for each fracture type, respectively (P<.05). Among patients taking NSAIDs, subtrochanteric femur fractures had a 2.4 times higher risk of nonunion and humeral shaft and tibial shaft fractures both had a 1.7 times higher risk of nonunion (P<.05). Multivariate analysis showed NSAID use to be an independent risk factor in all 3 types. Cost analysis showed a great increase in economic burden (P<.05). This study indicated that NSAID exposure was associated with fracture nonunion. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):221-227.].
Collapse
|
39
|
Tubog TD. Overview of multimodal analgesia initiated in the perioperative setting. J Perioper Pract 2020; 31:191-198. [PMID: 32508237 DOI: 10.1177/1750458920928843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite progress in pain management in the perioperative setting, the literature is full of evidence that managing postoperative pain is suboptimal. Since the mechanism of pain is complex, the use of multimodal technique allows clinicians to use a combination of two or more drugs targeting different areas of pain transmission because of surgery. As part of enhanced recovery initiatives after surgery, healthcare and professional organisations incorporate the use of multimodal analgesia in surgical guidelines to improve patient satisfaction. This review aims to understand and summarise the current body of evidence involving the most common pharmacological therapies to manage postoperative pain in the preoperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tito D Tubog
- Associate Program Director, Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Karateev AE, Lila AM, Zagorodnii NV, Amirdzhanova VN, Pogozheva EL, Filatova ES, Nesterenko VA. [Control of pain in the early post-traumatic period in the outpatient practice. Results of the multi-center observational study RAPTOR (Rational Analgesia PostTraumatic: an Observational Research)]. TERAPEVT ARKH 2020; 92:69-77. [PMID: 32598778 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2020.05.000678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Evaluate the frequency, nature and course of PTP, as well as the effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs in PTP in real clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS The assessment of the condition and need for NSAIDs (original meloxicam) in 1115 outpatient patients who suffered a fracture of the radius (32.2%), injury to the knee (35.2%) or ligaments of the ankle (32.6%); women/men 51.5 and 48.5%, average age 46.915.5 years. We evaluated the dynamics of pain intensity (on a numerical rating scale NRS 010) at rest and during movement, the preservation of moderate and severe pain, as well as the development of adverse drugs reactions (ADR) to NSAIDs 48 weeks after injury. RESULTS The average intensity of pain during movement decreased from 7.031.66 to 2.211.38 (p0.001), at rest from 4.462.07 to 0.710.989 (p0.001). The number of people with pain severity 4 in the NRS in 48 weeks after the radius fracture, injury of the knee and ligaments of ankle was 21.0, 16.9 and 11.9%, with moderate or severe impairment of the injured limb 40.4, 26.2 and 16.3%, respectively. The need for taking NSAIDs up to 7 days was noted in 43.3%, 714 days-in 41.8%, more than 2 weeks or constantly in 14.9% of patients. Weak or moderate ADR were observed in 20.8% of patients, mainly dyspepsia and hypertension. Discontinuation of NSAIDs due to ADR was required in only 2.6% of patients. Pain retention 4 in NRS was associated with initially expressed pain (7 in NRS) OR 2.75 (95% CI 0.834.13; p0.001) and the presence of osteoarthritis of knee and/or hip OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.032.34; p=0.039). CONCLUSION PTP decreases rapidly in most patients after a radius fracture, injury of the knee, and ankle ligament injury while taking the original meloxicam. However, in a significant part of patients, moderate or severe PTP persists after 48 weeks, which requires prolonged analgesic therapy and active rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A M Lila
- Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
| | - N V Zagorodnii
- Priorova National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Marongiu G, Dolci A, Verona M, Capone A. The biology and treatment of acute long-bones diaphyseal fractures: Overview of the current options for bone healing enhancement. Bone Rep 2020; 12:100249. [PMID: 32025538 PMCID: PMC6997516 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diaphyseal fractures represent a complex biological entity that could often end into impaired bone-healing, with delayed union and non-union occurring up to 10% of cases. The role of the modern orthopaedic surgeon is to optimize the fracture healing environment, recognize and eliminate possible interfering factors, and choose the best suited surgical fixation technique. The impaired reparative process after surgical intervention can be modulated with different surgical techniques, such as dynamization or exchange nailing after failed intramedullary nailing. Moreover, the mechanical stability of a nail can be improved through augmentation plating, bone grafting or external fixation techniques with satisfactory results. According to the "diamond concept", local therapies, such as osteoconductive scaffolds, bone growth factors, and osteogenic cells can be successfully applied in "polytherapy" for the enhancement of delayed union and non-union of long bones diaphyseal fractures. Moreover, systemic anti-osteoporosis anabolic drugs, such as teriparatide, have been proposed as off-label treatment for bone healing enhancement both in fresh complex shaft fractures and impaired unions, especially for fragility fractures. The article aims to review the biological and mechanical principles of failed reparative osteogenesis of diaphyseal fractures after surgical treatment. Moreover, the evidence about the modern non-surgical and pharmacological options for bone healing enhancement will discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marongiu
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Lungomare Poetto, Cagliari 09126, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Multimodal Pain Management and Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:580-589. [PMID: 31770340 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective population-based cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE Given the lack of large-scale data on the use and efficacy of multimodal analgesia in spine fusion surgery, we conducted a population-based analysis utilizing the nationwide claims-based Premier Healthcare database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Multimodal analgesia, combining different pain signaling pathways to achieve additive and synergistic effects, is increasingly emerging as the standard of care. METHODS Cases of posterior lumbar fusion surgery were extracted (2006-2016). Opioid-only analgesia was compared to multimodal analgesia, that is, systemic opioid analgesia + either acetaminophen, steroids, gabapentinoids, ketamine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, or neuraxial anesthesia (categorized into 1, 2, or >2 additional analgesic modes). Mixed-effects models measured associations between multimodal analgesia categories and outcomes, including opioid prescription dose, cost/length of hospitalization, and opioid-related complications. Odds ratios (ORs, or % change) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS Among 265,538 patients the incidence of multimodal analgesia was 61.1% (162,156); multimodal pain management-specifically when adding NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors to opioids-was associated with reduced opioid prescription (-13.3% CI -16.7 to -9.7%), cost (-2.9% CI -3.9 to -1.8%) and length of hospitalization (-7.3% CI -8.5 to -6.1%). Multimodal analgesia in general was associated with stepwise decreased odds for gastrointestinal complications (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.04; OR 0.84, CI 0.75-0.95; OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.96), whereas odds were increased for postoperative delirium (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.32; OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.59; OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.99-1.74), and counterintuitively- naloxone administration (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38; OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.37-1.77; OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.52-2.23) with increasing analgesic modes used: one, two, or more additional analgesic modes, respectively. Post-hoc analysis revealed that specifically gabapentinoid use increased odds of naloxone requirement by about 50%, regardless of concurrent opioid dose (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Although multimodal analgesia was not consistently implemented in spine fusion surgery, particularly NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors demonstrated opioid sparing effects. Moreover, results suggest a synergistic interaction between gabapentinoids and opioids, the former potentiating opioid effects resulting in greater naloxone requirement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
43
|
Hunter AM, Montgomery TP, Pitts CC, Moraes L, Anderson M, Wilson J, McGwin G, Shah A. Postoperative aspirin use and its effect on bone healing in the treatment of ankle fractures. Injury 2020; 51:554-558. [PMID: 31806383 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is hesitancy to administer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) within the postoperative period following fracture care due to concern for delayed union or nonunion. However, aspirin (ASA) is routinely used for chemoprophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is gaining popularity for use after treatment of ankle fractures. The current study examines the incidence of nonunion of operative ankle fractures and risk of DVT in patients who did and did not receive postoperative ASA. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients treated between 2008 and 2018 for ankle fractures requiring operative fixation by three Foot and Ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single institution. Demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative medical and surgical complications were compared between patients who did and did not receive ASA postoperatively. For both groups, union was evaluated by clinical exam as well as by radiograph, for those with 6-week, 12-week, or 24-week follow-up. RESULTS Five-hundred and six patients met inclusion criteria: 152 who received ASA and 354 who did not. Radiographic healing at six weeks was demonstrated in 95.9% (94/98) and 98.6% (207/210) respectively (p-value .2134). There was no significant difference in time to radiographic union between groups. The risk of postoperative DVTs in those with and without ASA was not significantly different (0.7% (1/137) vs 1.2% (4/323), respectively; p-value .6305). CONCLUSION Postoperative use of ASA does not delay radiographic union of operative ankle fractures or affect the rate of postoperative DVT. This is the first and largest study to examine the effect of ASA on time to union of ankle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Hunter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Tyler P Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Charles C Pitts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Leonardo Moraes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Matthew Anderson
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - John Wilson
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Gerald McGwin
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Ashish Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mir HR, Miller AN, Obremskey WT, Jahangir AA, Hsu JR. Confronting the Opioid Crisis: Practical Pain Management and Strategies: AOA 2018 Critical Issues Symposium. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:e126. [PMID: 31800430 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The United States is in the midst of an opioid crisis. Clinicians have been part of the problem because of overprescribing of narcotics for perioperative pain management. Clinicians need to understand the pathophysiology and science of addiction to improve perioperative management of pain for their patients. Multiple modalities for pain management exist that decrease the use of narcotics. Physical strategies, cognitive strategies, and multimodal medication can all provide improved pain relief and decrease the use of narcotics. National medical societies are developing clinical practice guidelines for pain management that incorporate multimodal strategies and multimodal medication. Changes to policy that improve provider education, access to naloxone, and treatment for addiction can decrease narcotic misuse and the risk of addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan R Mir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Florida, Florida Orthopedic Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anna N Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William T Obremskey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - A Alex Jahangir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Joseph R Hsu
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ali MU, Usman M, Patel K. Effects of NSAID use on bone healing: A meta-analysis of retrospective case–control and cohort studies within clinical settings. TRAUMA-ENGLAND 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/1460408619886211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction This meta-analysis aims to determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is significantly associated with adverse bone healing outcomes within clinical settings, including trauma and elective spine settings. It will also explore bone healing outcomes with the type, route, dosage and duration of NSAID exposure and aims to demonstrate the effects of various other confounding factors on bone healing outcomes. Methods Electronic databases including MedLine, Embase and Cochrane were searched from January 1975 to December 2017. A distinct analysis of observational long bone and spine studies in adult populations was performed, assessing the effects of NSAID exposure on bone healing. Studies from paediatric population and randomised trials also underwent separate assessment in the synthesis. Meta-analysis was conducted in compliance with QUORUM and PRISMA guidelines. Results Quantitative assessment of observational studies suggested a significant risk of bone healing complications with NSAID exposure across each clinical group: long bone (p = 0.0004) and spine (p = 0.02). Analysis of paediatric studies revealed a non-significant association of poor outcomes with NSAID use (p = 0.36), while assessment of randomised trials demonstrated a statistically significant risk of complications following NSAID administration (p = 0.04). Meta-regression further suggested smoking to be a substantial confounder associated with adverse bone healing outcomes (p < 0.00001). Conclusion Inclusion of only fair and moderate-quality retrospective cohort and case–control studies in the current synthesis limits the clinical application of its findings and therefore warrants the need for further research. Thus, attempts to conduct high-quality prospective cohort and randomised trials to study the effects of NSAID use on bone healing would be very helpful and will provide a basis for more extensive research in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mehvish Usman
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Kuntal Patel
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang R, Bathon JM, Ward MM. Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs as Potential Disease-Modifying Medications in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 72:518-528. [PMID: 31705611 DOI: 10.1002/art.41164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first-line pharmacotherapy for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). In recent years, treatment options have expanded with the availability of biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-17 inhibitors. However, a treatment strategy that clearly prevents syndesmophyte formation has not been established. Observational studies of patients with ankylosing spondylitis indicated potential disease-modifying effects of NSAIDs, but two randomized trials came to different conclusions. More broadly, whether any of the currently available medications for axial SpA have an effect on spine radiographic progression, beyond symptom control, remains inconclusive. In this article, we will review clinical studies of the disease modification effects of NSAIDs and biologics in axial SpA; examine genetic, animal, and clinical evidence of the effects of NSAIDs on bone formation; and discuss how future studies may investigate the question of disease modification in axial SpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runsheng Wang
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Joan M Bathon
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Michael M Ward
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Haffner M, Saiz AM, Nathe R, Hwang J, Migdal C, Klineberg E, Roberto R. Preoperative multimodal analgesia decreases 24-hour postoperative narcotic consumption in elective spinal fusion patients. Spine J 2019; 19:1753-1763. [PMID: 31325627 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Effective postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery has been associated with shorter hospital stays, reduced rates of hospital readmissions due to pain, and decreased cost of care. Furthermore, preoperative multimodal analgesia regimens have been shown to decrease postoperative subjective pain measurements and narcotic consumption in patients undergoing spinal fusion and total arthroplasty surgeries. PURPOSE Compare the difference in effects on 24-hour postoperative narcotic consumption, reported pain, and early mobility with administration of preoperative celecoxib plus gabapentin, gabapentin alone, and a nonstandardized analgesia regimen in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery involving ≤5 levels. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review, Level of Evidence III. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 185 adult patients undergoing elective spinal fusion surgery involving ≤5 levels from 2013 to 2017 at one academic institution. Patients were excluded if the surgery was nonelective, for oncological purposes, or the patient was younger than 17 years old. OUTCOME MEASURES Twenty-four-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, 24-hour postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, postoperative day to ambulate, and postoperative day to clear physical therapy. METHODS A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were grouped by whether they had received preoperative celecoxib plus gabapentin, gabapentin alone, or neither of these medications. Opioid medication intake for the first 24 hours after the surgery end time was tabulated and converted to morphine equivalents. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were also averaged over the first 24 hours. Finally, physical therapy notes were reviewed to determine the time taken for the patient to first ambulate and to clear physical therapy. No external funding was procured for this research and the authors' conflicts of interest are not pertinent to the present work. RESULTS Twenty-four-hour postoperative morphine equivalent consumption was significantly lower in the celecoxib plus gabapentin group compared with control (p=.004). Patients in the celecoxib plus gabapentin group had significantly lower mean VAS scores (p=.002) and had earlier mobility postoperatively (p=.012) than those in the control group. Early mobility and time to physical therapy clearance did differ between the celecoxib + gabapentin group compared with the gabapentin alone group. The gabapentin group had a significantly higher 24-hour morphine dose equivalent (p=.013) and a significantly higher VAS average (p=.009) compared with the celecoxib + gabapentin group. Gabapentin given alone compared with control did not show statistically significant improved outcomes in postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, pain scores or physical therapy goals. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that administering a selective COX-2 inhibitor and GABA-analogue preoperatively can significantly decrease 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, VAS pain scores, and elapsed time to postoperative mobility in patients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery of ≤5 levels. Optimal standardized dosing and drug combination for preoperative multimodal analgesia remains to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Haffner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Augustine M Saiz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| | - Ryan Nathe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Joshua Hwang
- University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Christopher Migdal
- University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Rolando Roberto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Opioids and analgesics use after adult spinal deformity surgery correlates with sagittal alignment and preoperative analgesic pattern. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2019; 29:73-84. [PMID: 31493111 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06141-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores and sagittal parameters of adult spinal deformity (ASD)-operated patients in the context of their analgesic consumption especially opioids (narcotics) over the first year postoperative period. METHODS In total, 372 patients from a multicenter database were stratified into 3 groups at baseline: 241 patients in the minimal group (no analgesic, or NSAIDs/narcotics weekly or less), 64 in the NSAIDs every day group and 67 in the narcotics every day group. HRQOL and back and leg pain scores were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Also several sagittal alignment parameters were assessed. RESULTS Significant improvements in pain and HRQOL scores were observed across all 3 groups by 1 year (P < 0.05) postoperatively. While the minimal group had the best pre- and postoperative HRQOL scores, the NSAID group demonstrated the best improvement in HRQOL. Only the minimal group displayed continued improvement from 6 months to 1 year. 90%, 65% and 40% of minimal, NSAID and narcotic groups of patients, respectively, no longer took any analgesics at 1 year postoperatively. Alternatively, 36% of patients in the narcotics group continued to take narcotics at 1 year. Residual malalignment increased NSAIDs consumption in different groups at 1 year. CONCLUSION This study evaluated the analgesics use after ASD surgery in relation to the clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite important postoperative opioids consumption in the narcotics group, clinical outcome yet improved. Malalignment parameters demonstrated a predictive value in regard to NSAIDs' usage. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
|
49
|
Current Evidence for Acute Pain Management of Musculoskeletal Injuries and Postoperative Pain in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes. Clin J Sport Med 2019; 29:430-438. [PMID: 31460958 DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sports-related injuries in young athletes are increasingly prevalent with an estimated 2.6 million children and adolescents sustaining a sports-related injury annually. Acute sports-related injuries and surgical correction of sports-related injuries cause physical pain and psychological burdens on pediatric athletes and their families. This article aims to evaluate current acute pain management options in pediatric athletes and acute pain management strategies for postoperative pain after sports-related injuries. This article will also elucidate which areas of pain management for pediatric athletes are lacking evidence and help direct future clinical trials. DATA SOURCES We conducted a literature search through PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to provide an extensive review of initial and postoperative pain management strategies for pediatric sports-related musculoskeletal injuries. MAIN RESULTS The current knowledge of acute pain management for initial sports-related injuries, postoperative pain management for orthopedic surgeries, as well as complementary and alternative medical therapies in pediatric sports-related injuries is presented. Studies evaluating conservative management, enteral and nonenteral medications, regional anesthesia, and complementary medical therapies are included. CONCLUSIONS Adequate pain management is important for sports injuries in children and adolescents for emotional as well as physical healing, but a balance must be achieved to provide acceptable pain relief while minimizing opioid use and side effects from analgesic medications. More studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of nonopioid analgesic medications and complementary therapies in pediatric patients with acute sports-related injuries.
Collapse
|
50
|
Wilson JRF, Badhiwala JH, Moghaddamjou A, Martin AR, Fehlings MG. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy; A Review of the Latest Advances and Future Directions in Management. Neurospine 2019; 16:494-505. [PMID: 31476852 PMCID: PMC6790745 DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938314.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The assessment, diagnosis, operative and nonoperative management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) have evolved rapidly over the last 20 years. A clearer understanding of the pathobiology of DCM has led to attempts to develop objective measurements of the severity of myelopathy, including technology such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, biomarkers, and ancillary clinical testing. New pharmacological treatments have the potential to alter the course of surgical outcomes, and greater innovation in surgical techniques have made surgery safer, more effective and less invasive. Future developments for the treatment of DCM will seek to improve the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, improve the objectivity of clinical assessment, and increase the use of surgical technology to ensure the best outcome is achieved for each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie R F Wilson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jetan H Badhiwala
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ali Moghaddamjou
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan R Martin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|