Pharmacokinetic interaction studies of co-administration of ticagrelor and atorvastatin or simvastatin in healthy volunteers

Rhabdomyolysis with Co-Administration of Statins and Antiplatelet Therapies-Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

PURPOSE

While statins and antiplatelet therapies are largely prescribed together worldwide, limited information is available on the safety of their association regarding rhabdomyolysis occurrence. We aimed to assess the reporting of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with a combination of statin and antiplatelet therapy, compared to statin alone.

METHODS

We used the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to compare the rhabdomyolysis reporting between statin (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) plus antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) groups versus statin alone groups, for each statin and antiplatelet therapy. Study setting was restricted to patients aged 45 or older, including reports up until 1st September, 2021. We computed reporting Odds-Ratio (ROR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) to quantify the disproportionality between groups, adjusted on age and sex.

RESULTS

Among the 11,431,708 reports of adverse reactions, we extracted 9,489 cases of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with statins, of whom 2,464 (26%) were also treated with antiplatelet therapy. The reporting of rhabdomyolysis was increased when ticagrelor was associated with atorvastatin (ROR 1.30 [1.02-1.65]) or rosuvastatin (ROR 1.90 [1.42-2.54]) compared to the respective statin alone but did not change when aspirin, clopidogrel or prasugrel were considered.

CONCLUSION

Rhabdomyolysis reporting was increased when ticagrelor -but not other antiplatelet agents- was notified with the most prescribed statins in practice. This finding needs to be considered by physicians especially in high-risk patients.

A disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for ticagrelor

Background

Ticagrelor is a commonly used antiplatelet agent, but due to the stringent criteria for trial population inclusion and the limited sample size, its safety profile has not been fully elucidated.

Method

We utilized OpenVigil 2.1 to query the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and retrieved reports by the generic name "ticagrelor" published between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2023. Adverse drug events (ADEs) were classified and described according to the preferred terms and system organ classes in the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activity. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) were used to detect signals.

Results

The number of ADE reports with ticagrelor as the primary suspect drug was 12,909. The top three ADEs were dyspnea [1824 reports, ROR 7.34, PRR 6.45, information component (IC) 2.68], chest pain (458 reports, ROR 5.43, PRR 5.27, IC 2.39), and vascular stent thrombosis (406 reports, ROR 409.53, PRR 396.68, IC 8.02). The highest ROR, 630.24, was found for "vascular stent occlusion". Cardiac arrest (137 reports, ROR 3.41, PRR 3.39, IC 1.75), atrial fibrillation (99 reports, ROR 2.05, PRR 2.04, IC 1.03), asphyxia (101 reports, ROR 23.60, PRR 23.43, IC 4.51), and rhabdomyolysis (57 reports, ROR 2.75, PRR 2.75, IC 1.45) were suspected new adverse events of ticagrelor.

Conclusion

The FAERS database produced potential signals associated with ticagrelor that have not been recorded in the package inserts, such as cardiac arrest, atrial fibrillation, asphyxia, and rhabdomyolysis. Further clinical surveillance is needed to quantify and validate potential hazards associated with ticagrelor-related adverse events.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs: A Narrative Review

The modern history of cholesterol-lowering drugs started in 1972 when Dr. Akira Endo identified an active compound (compactin) that inhibited cholesterol biosynthesis from the culture broth of blue-green mold (Penicillium citrinum Pen-51). Since 1987, statins have represented the milestone for the treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. A new therapy for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia since the discovery of statins is ezetimibe, the first and only agent inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Ezetimibe was approved by the FDA in October 2002. A year later, the association between gain-of-function PCSK9 genetic mutations and hypercholesterolemia was reported, and this discovery opened a new era in lipid-lowering therapies. Monoclonal antibodies and small-interfering RNA approaches to reduce PCSK9 were developed and approved for clinical use in 2015 and 2022, respectively. Finally, the newly approved bempedoic acid, an oral adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase inhibitor that lowers LDL-C, is able to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in both primary and secondary prevention. In the present narrative review, we summarize the pharmacological properties and the clinical efficacy of all these agents currently used for a tailored therapy of hypercholesterolemia in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Ticagrelor Increases Exposure to the Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Substrate Rosuvastatin

Ticagrelor and rosuvastatin are often used concomitantly after atherothrombotic events. Several cases of rhabdomyolysis during concomitant ticagrelor and rosuvastatin have been reported, suggesting a drug-drug interaction. We showed recently that ticagrelor inhibits breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, 1B3, and 2B1-mediated rosuvastatin transport in vitro. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ticagrelor on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in humans. In a randomized, crossover study, 9 healthy volunteers ingested a single dose of 90 mg ticagrelor or placebo, followed by a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin 1 hour later. Ticagrelor 90 mg or placebo were additionally administered 12, 24, and 36 hours after their first dose. Ticagrelor increased rosuvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration 2.6-fold (90% confidence intervals: 1.8-3.8 and 1.7-4.0, P = 0.001 and P = 0.003), and prolonged its half-life from 3.1 to 6.6 hours (P = 0.009). Ticagrelor also decreased the renal clearance of rosuvastatin by 11% (3%-19%, P = 0.032). The N-desmethylrosuvastatin:rosuvastatin AUC0-10h ratio remained unaffected by ticagrelor. Ticagrelor had no effect on the plasma concentrations of the endogenous OATP1B substrates glycodeoxycholate 3-O-glucuronide, glycochenodeoxycholate 3-O-glucuronide, glycodeoxycholate 3-O-sulfate, and glycochenodeoxycholate 3-O-sulfate, or the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide substrate taurocholic acid. These data indicate that ticagrelor increases rosuvastatin concentrations more than twofold in humans, probably mainly by inhibiting intestinal BCRP. Because the risk for rosuvastatin-induced myotoxicity increases along with rosuvastatin plasma concentrations, using ticagrelor concomitantly with high doses of rosuvastatin should be avoided.

Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelet drugs

INTRODUCTION

Platelets play a key role in arterial thrombosis and antiplatelet therapy is pivotal in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current antiplatelet drugs target different pathways of platelet activation and show specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, implicating clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the role of platelets in hemostasis and cardiovascular thrombosis, and discusses the key pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions and reversal strategies of clinically used antiplatelet drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Antiplatelet therapies target distinct pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A₂ synthesis, adenosine diphosphate-mediated signaling, integrin α_IIbβ₃ (GPIIb/IIIa), thrombin-mediated platelet activation via the PAR1 receptor and phosphodiesterases. Key clinical drug-drug interactions of antiplatelet agents involve acetylsalicylic acid - ibuprofen, clopidogrel - omeprazole, and morphine - oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, all of which lead to an attenuated antiplatelet effect. Platelet function and genetic testing and the use of scores (ARC-HBR, PRECISE-DAPT, ESC ischemic risk definition) may contribute to a more tailored antiplatelet therapy. High on-treatment platelet reactivity presents a key problem in the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A treatment strategy involving early initiation of an intravenous antiplatelet agent may be able to bridge the gap of insufficient platelet inhibition in high ischemic risk patients with STEMI.

The Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Ticagrelor Leading to Rhabdomyolysis: A Case Report and Narrative Review

Objective

Drug interactions are a common cause of morbidity and mortality and may require prompt discontinuation of therapeutic regimens due to harmful side effects. Patients with acute coronary syndromes are likely to be prescribed multiple medications that are metabolized through the cytochrome P450 system, increasing the probability for drug interaction. Atorvastatin and simvastatin are both well known to interact with the oral P2Y12 agent ticagrelor. The purpose of this paper is to describe the interaction of ticagrelor with rosuvastatin leading to rhabdomyolysis, which is less clearly defined in the literature.

Method

We report a case of a 74-year-old male who presented with bilateral lower extremity weakness and difficulty ambulating for one month after being prescribed ticagrelor for a drug eluting stent, in the setting of already being on rosuvastatin. His clinical picture and laboratory findings were consistent with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis. His medications were adjusted to a regimen of clopidogrel and alirocumab. One month later, he returned to his baseline status.

Results

The mechanism of interaction between rosuvastatin and ticagrelor appears to be multifactorial. It may be caused by CYP450-mediated metabolism from a small amount of crossover between isoenzymes. Ticagrelor may also cause acute kidney injury, increasing the concentration of rosuvastatin. Other mechanisms of interaction include genetic differences in the organic anion transporter polypeptides and transportation through p-glycoprotein.

Conclusion

Future pharmacokinetic studies are warranted to better understand the interaction.

Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Interventional Neuroradiology: Current Status and Perspectives

In the field of interventional neuroradiology, antiplatelet agents are commonly used to prepare patients before the implantation of permanent endovascular materials. Among the available drugs, clopidogrel is the most frequently used one, but resistance phenomena are considered to be relatively common. Prasugrel and ticagrelor were recently added to the pharmacologic arsenal, but the safety of these agents in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures is still a subject of discussion. The cumulative experience with both drugs is less extensive than that with clopidogrel, and the experience with patients in the neurology field is less extensive than in the cardiology domain. In the present article, we provide a narrative review of studies that investigated safety issues of oral P2Y12 inhibitors in interventional neuroradiology and discuss potential routes for future research.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Approved and Investigational P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists

Coronary artery disease remains the major cause of mortality worldwide. Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are cornerstone treatments for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Clopidogrel has long been the gold standard but has major pharmacological limitations such as a slow onset and long duration of effect, as well as weak platelet inhibition with high inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There has been a strong need to develop potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists with more favorable pharmacological properties. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent and have a faster onset of action; however, they have shown an increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is highly potent and has a very rapid onset and offset of effect; however, its indication is limited to P2Y12 antagonist-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development, namely vicagrel and selatogrel. Vicagrel is an analog of clopidogrel with enhanced and more efficient formation of its active metabolite. Selatogrel is characterized by a rapid onset of action following subcutaneous administration and developed for early treatment of a suspected acute myocardial infarction. This review article describes the clinical pharmacology profile of marketed P2Y12 receptor antagonists and those under development focusing on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction liability.

Effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats

CONTEXT

Rivaroxaban and ticagrelor are two common drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. However, the drug-drug interaction between them is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats both in vivo and in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sensitive and reliable UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of rivaroxaban in rat plasma. Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into ticagrelor pre-treated group (10 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and control group. The pharmacokinetics of orally administered rivaroxaban (10 mg/kg, single dose) with or without ticagrelor pre-treatment was investigated with developed UPLC-MS/MS method. Additionally, Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes were also used to investigate the drug-drug interaction between these two drugs in vitro.

RESULTS

The C _max (221.34 ± 53.33 vs. 691.18 ± 238.31 ng/mL) and the AUC_(0-t) (1060.97 ± 291.21 vs. 3483.03 ± 753.83 μg·h/L) of rivaroxaban increased significantly (p < 0.05) with ticagrelor pre-treatment. The MRT_(0-∞) of rivaroxaban increased from 4.41 ± 0.79 to 5.97 ± 1.11 h, while the intrinsic clearance decreased from 9.93 ± 2.55 to 2.89 ± 0.63 L/h/kg (both p < 0.05) after pre-treated with ticagrelor. Enzyme kinetic study indicated that ticagrelor decreased rivaroxaban metabolic clearance with the IC₅₀ value of 14.04 μmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vivo and in vitro results demonstrated that there is a drug-drug interaction between ticagrelor and rivaroxaban in rats. Further studies need to be carried out to verify whether similar interactions truly apply in humans and whether these interactions have clinical significance.

Oral anti-diabetic drugs as endocrine disruptors in vitro - No evidence for additive effects in binary mixtures

Diabetes is one of the World's most concerning health problems and millions of patients are using anti-diabetic drugs (ADDs) in order to control blood glucose. The in vitro H295R steroidogenesis assay was implemented to investigate endocrine effects of three ADDs, metformin (MET), glimepiride (GLIM), sitagliptin (SIT) and the cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin (SIM) individually and in three binary mixtures. Steroid hormones were analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Mixture effects were assessed by applying the Concentration Addition (CA) model. All tested drugs and binary mixtures interrupted the H295R steroidogenesis with different potency. The effects of MET:GLIM on the steroidogenesis were overall similar to the steroidogenic profile of GLIM, however effects were less pronounced. The binary mixture of MET:SIT showed overall minor effects on steroid production and only at very high concentrations. The SIM:SIT mixture showed inhibition downstream from cholesterol, which was attributed to the effects of SIM. The CA model partly predicted the effect of MET:SIT on some steroids but significantly overestimated the effects of MET:GLIM and SIM:SIT. Thus, the applicability of the CA model was limited and cocktail effects appeared to be intermediate responses of individual drugs, rather than additive. The complexity of dynamic pathways such as steroidogenesis appears to significantly reduce the use of the CA model. In conclusion, more dynamic models are needed to predict mixture effects in complex systems.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between dronedarone and ticagrelor following oral administration in rats

Dronedarone and ticagrelor have high co-administration potential in patients with both acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation. The objective of the present in vivo study was to investigate the potential interaction between dronedarone (5 and 10 mg/kg) and ticagrelor (5 and 10 mg/kg) when administered orally to rats. Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly distributed into eight groups; consisting of a dronedarone only group, a ticagrelor only group, a dronedarone with ticagrelor-pretreatment group, and a ticagrelor with dronedarone-pretreatment group. Pharmacokinetic exposure (AUC_inf = 1472 ng·h/mL) associated with administration of 10 mg/kg of dronedarone increased significantly, with delayed T _max in the group that received ticagrelor-pretreatment when compared to the dronedarone only group (AUC_inf = 723 ng·h/mL). In addition, pharmacokinetic exposure (AUC_inf = 2391 ng·h/mL) associated with administration of 10 mg/kg of ticagrelor increased significantly, with increased K _el (0.31 h^-1) and decreased V _z/F (14.6 L/kg) in the dronedarone-pretreatment group when compared to the ticagrelor only group (AUC_inf = 1616 ng·h/mL; K _el = 0.21 h^-1; V _z/F  =  31.3 L/kg). Results of our study suggest that further investigation of a potential interaction between dronedarone and ticagrelor in humans is justified and that caution may need to be exercised when dronedarone and ticagrelor pharmacotherapies concomitantly.

Statins and Elderly: From Clinical Trials to Daily Practice

Elderly patients represent a rising social problem, due to the exponential growth of persons in these age groups and their atherothrombotic burden. The management of this population still raises several challenges, requiring a balance between elevated cardiovascular risk, clinical complexity, frailty and co-morbidities. Statins represent the main pillar in cardiovascular prevention, lowering serum cholesterol and reducing mortality and ischemic events, especially in high-risk patients. Yet, elderly patients have often been excluded from major clinical trials of statins, thus limiting the experience with these drugs in advanced age. Moreover, important barriers to the use of statins in the elderly exist due to potential risks attributed to altered metabolism, comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions and financial constraints. This situation has led to a "statin paradox", since high-risk elderly patients, that would most benefit from the use of statins, may be undertreated with these drugs in real life. The vague indications provided by guidelines mean that this issue is still debated, especially regarding primary prevention. Nevertheless, the benefits in outcome offered by statins cannot be neglected. Efforts should be made in order to focus on the importance of statin use in the elderly and to provide clinicians with adequate tools for case by case decisions.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Atorvastatin Incorporating Delayed Gastric Emptying and Acid-to-Lactone Conversion

The drug-drug interaction profile of atorvastatin confirms that disposition is determined by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs). Drugs that affect gastric emptying, including dulaglutide, also affect atorvastatin pharmacokinetics (PK). Atorvastatin is a carboxylic acid that exists in equilibrium with a lactone form in vivo. The purpose of this work was to assess gastric acid-mediated lactone equilibration of atorvastatin and incorporate this into a physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model to describe atorvastatin acid, lactone, and their major metabolites. In vitro acid-to-lactone conversion was assessed in simulated gastric fluid and included in the model. The PBPK model was verified with in vivo data including CYP3A4 and OATP inhibition studies. Altering the gastric acid-lactone equilibrium reproduced the change in atorvastatin PK observed with dulaglutide. The model emphasizes the need to include gastric acid-lactone conversion and all major atorvastatin-related species for the prediction of atorvastatin PK.

Effect of Ticagrelor, a Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inhibitor, on the Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Rats

Tadalafil is a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate. Because there are few data on drug-drug interactions, it is advisable to take sufficient consideration when co-administering tadalafil with CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. This study was conducted to assess the effect of ticagrelor, a CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of tadalafil after oral administration to rats. A total of 20 Sprague–Dawley male rats were randomly divided into the non-pretreated group and ticagrelor-pretreated group, and tadalafil was orally administered to each group after pretreatment with or without ticagrelor. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points after oral administration of tadalafil. As a result, systemic exposure of tadalafil in the ticagrelor-pretreated group was significantly increased compared to the non-pretreated group (1.61-fold), and the clearance of tadalafil in the ticagrelor-pretreated group was significantly reduced than the non-pretreated group (37%). The prediction of the drug profile through the one-compartment model could explain the differences of pharmacokinetic properties of tadalafil in the non-pretreated and ticagrelor-pretreated groups. This study suggests that ticagrelor reduces a CYP3A-mediated tadalafil metabolism and that tadalafil and a combination regimen with tadalafil and ticagrelor requires dose control and specific pharmacotherapy.

Assessment of the Risk of Rhabdomyolysis and Myopathy During Concomitant Treatment with Ticagrelor and Statins

The introduction of ticagrelor, one of the first directly-acting oral antiplatelet drugs, provided new possibilities in the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor in dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin over clopidogrel for prevention of stent thrombosis in patients with ACS. Moreover, in the management of ACS, lipid-lowering treatment with high-intensity statin therapy is advised for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events over the long term. Despite the apparent advantages of combined antiplatelet and lipid-lowering treatments, a possible interaction between statins and ticagrelor may lead to myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. In this review, relevant information was gathered on the ticagrelor-statin interaction that might lead to this life-threatening condition. This review focuses on the most widely used statins—simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin. Possible mechanisms of this interaction are discussed, including CYP3A4 isoenzymes, organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATPs), P-glycoprotein and glucuronidation. PubMed database was searched for relevant case reports and all data gathered from the introduction of ticagrelor to March 2018 are presented and discussed. In summary, co-administration of statins and ticagrelor was found to be relatively safe in routinely prescribed doses. However, caution should be exercised, especially in elder populations.

Development of an LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of ticagrelor and its active metabolite during concomitant treatment with atorvastatin

A combination of antiplatelet drugs with high-intensity statin therapy is a standard in patients with coronary events. Concomitant treatment with ticagrelor, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, and CYP3A4-metabolized statins such as atorvastatin, might lead to an increased risk of muscle-related adverse events. Therefore, investigation of concentrations of these compounds in clinical samples is necessary. For this purpose, an LC-MS/MS method was developed for simultaneous determination of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX), as well as 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, which is the main metabolite of atorvastatin. Protein precipitation was used for sample preparation and afterwards the analytes were separated on a Kinetex XB-C18 column with an isocratic elution (water and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, 57:43, v/v). Detection was performed on a triple-quadrupole MS with multiple-reaction-monitoring via electrospray ionization. The method was fully validated according to the EMA's recommendations. Determination was possible within ranges: 1.25-2000 ng/mL for ticagrelor, 1.25-1000 ng/mL for its AR-C124910XX, 1.25-50 ng/mL for atorvastatin and 1.14-45.73 for 2-hydroxyatorvastatin. Within and between-run accuracy, expressed as a relative error, was within 0.05-10.56% for all analytes, while within and between-run precision, expressed as coefficient of variation, was within 0.61-9.91%. Ticagrelor, atorvastatin and their main metabolites were found to be stable in acetonitrile stock solutions, and in plasma samples stored for 24 h at room temperature, 1 month at -25 °C, after 3 cycles of freezing and thawing, and in processed samples stored as a dry residue for 24 h at 4 °C and for 24 h in autosampler at room temperature. This simple and rapid method allowed simultaneous determination of the analytes for the first time. The procedure was applied for the pharmacokinetic study of ticagrelor, its active metabolite AR-C124910XX, and 2-hydroxyatorvastatin in patients simultaneously treated with ticagrelor and atorvastatin.

Antioxidant properties of drugs used in Type 2 diabetes management: could they contribute to, confound or conceal effects of antioxidant therapy?

OBJECTIVES

This is a narrative review, investigating the antioxidant properties of drugs used in the management of diabetes, and discusses whether these antioxidant effects contribute to, confound, or conceal the effects of antioxidant therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search for articles reporting trials, or observational studies on the antioxidant effect of drugs used in the treatment of diabetes in humans or animals was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Ovid. Data were extracted, including data on a number of subjects, type of treatment (and duration) received, and primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcomes were reporting on changes in biomarkers of antioxidants concentrations and secondary outcomes were reporting on changes in biomarkers of oxidative stress.

RESULTS

Diabetes Mellitus is a disease characterized by increased oxidative stress. It is often accompanied by a spectrum of other metabolic disturbances, including elevated plasma lipids, elevated uric acid, hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and central obesity. This review shows evidence that some of the drugs in diabetes management have both in vivo and in vitro antioxidant properties through mechanisms such as scavenging free radicals and upregulating antioxidant gene expression.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes has been shown to exert an antioxidant effect..

Rosuvastatin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis - Possible Role of Ticagrelor and Patients' Pharmacogenetic Profile

Up to the beginning of 2018, a total of eight cases describing rare but clinically important drug interactions between rosuvastatin and ticagrelor which resulted in rhabdomyolysis have been noted in the Global World Health Organization (WHO) adverse drug reaction (ADR) database (VigiBase) as well as in available literature. There are several possible factors which could contribute to the onset of rhabdomyolysis: old age, initially excessive rosuvastatin dose, drug-drug interactions (DDI) on metabolic enzymes (CYPs and UGTs) and drug transporter levels (ABCB1, ABCG2, OATP1B1) and pharmacogenetic predisposition. We reviewed all available cases plus the case of an 87-year-old female Croatian/Caucasian patient who developed rhabdomyolysis following concomitant treatment with rosuvastatin and ticagrelor. The results of the pharmacogenetic analysis indicated that the patient was a carrier of inactivating alleles CYP2C9*1/*3, CYP3A4*1/*22, CYP3A5*3/*3, CYP2D6*1/*4, UGT1A1*28/*28, UGT2B7 -161C/T, ABCB1 3435C/T and ABCB1 1237C/T which could have added to the interactions not only between ticagrelor and rosuvastatin but also other concomitantly prescribed medicines, such as amiodarone and proton pump inhibitors. In this case report, the possible multifactorial causes for rhabdomyolysis following concomitant use of rosuvastatin and ticagrelor such as old age, polypharmacy, renal impairment, along with pharmacogenetics will be discussed.

Ticagrelor - toward more efficient platelet inhibition and beyond

Novel antiplatelet drugs, including ticagrelor, are being successively introduced into the therapy of atherothrombotic conditions due to their superiority over a standard combination of clopidogrel with acetylsalicylic acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A P2Y12 receptor antagonist, ticagrelor, is unique among antiplatelet drugs, because ticagrelor inhibits the platelet P2Y12 receptor in a reversible manner, and because it demonstrates a wide palette of advantageous pleiotropic effects associated with the increased concentration of adenosine. The pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor comprise cardioprotection, restoration of the myocardium after an ischemic event, promotion of the release of anticoagulative factors and, eventually, anti-inflammatory effects. Beyond the advantageous effects, the increased concentration of adenosine is responsible for some of ticagrelor's adverse effects, including dyspnea and bradycardia. Large-scale clinical trials demonstrated that both standard 12-month therapy and long-term use of ticagrelor reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with ACS, but at the expense of a higher risk of major bleeding. Further trials focused on the use of ticagrelor in conditions other than ACS, including ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease and status after coronary artery bypass grafting. The results of these trials suggest comparable efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in extra-coronary indications, but firm conclusions are anticipated from currently ongoing studies. Here, we summarize current evidence on the superiority of ticagrelor over other P2Y12 antagonists in ACS, discuss the mechanism underlying the drug-drug interactions and pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor, and present future perspectives of non-coronary indications for ticagrelor.

Ticagrelor Leads to Statin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Following acute coronary intervention in cardiology patients, the combined medical therapy with the platelet inhibitory drug ticagrelor and a statin medication (e.g., simvastatin) is recommended according to international guidelines. Yet combined therapeutic regimens have the potential of pharmacological interaction with both ticagrelor and simvastatin being metabolized by CYP3A4. Rhabdomyolysis is a known side-effect of statin therapy and combined therapy increases the susceptibility to this complication. CASE REPORT A 72-year-old patient presented to our Emergency Department with typical signs of rhabdomyolysis consisting of muscular cramps and pain in both legs and a significant elevation of creatinine kinase (CK). Five months prior to this presentation, he had been hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome followed by a coronary intervention of a high-grade left anterior descending artery stenosis. His long-term medication included simvastatin 20 mg daily, which he had taken for several years, and ticagrelor, which had been added to his medication following coronary intervention. The patient showed fast recovery of symptoms and rapid normalization of CK levels upon treatment change from ticagrelor to clopidogrel with a paused statin administration. CONCLUSIONS The combined use of ticagrelor with low dose simvastatin poses a risk for rhabdomyolysis even in patients with normal kidney function. Patients treated with ticagrelor might require changes in statin therapy and dose adjustments in order to avoid pharmacological interactions and higher risk for adverse effects.

Elevated Creatine Kinase due to Potential Drug Interaction With Ticagrelor and Atorvastatin

Purpose:

Ticagrelor and atorvastatin are commonly used medications in the management of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous intervention. This is a report of a patient case of a potential drug interaction leading to the use of alternative therapy.

Case Report:

A 58-year-old male presented for cardiac catheterization following an abnormal stress test. He underwent placement of a drug-eluting stent and was started on ticagrelor. Three months later, he was noted to have elevated creatine kinase (CK), thought to be related to a potential drug–drug interaction between ticagrelor and atorvastatin. Ticagrelor was discontinued and he was successfully transitioned to clopidogrel. CK returned to normal within weeks of this change.

Discussion:

Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated a potential interaction between ticagrelor and atorvastatin but have not been deemed clinically significant. To date, only one other case report has been published discussing this interaction and consideration of alternative therapy. This case report is unique, with ticagrelor being the only new medication added prior to the abnormal CK finding.

Conclusions:

A probable drug–drug interaction occurred with concomitant ticagrelor and atorvastatin. While this interaction may not always be clinically significant, it is reasonable to consider in patients who present with signs and symptoms of adverse effects.

Statin drug interactions and related adverse reactions: an update

INTRODUCTION

Statins reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease and their use is expanding, especially in elderly. Statins are prescribed on a long-term basis and may undergo drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with other drugs. Statins have different safety and tolerability, and this might affect the possibility of DDIs with other cardiovascular drugs, increasing the risk of statin-associated myopathy and hepatotoxicity. Polypharmacy and pharmacogenetic variability are potential causes of statin DDIs. Thus, the safety and adverse effects of statins, particularly in patients receiving multiple medications at risk of DDIs, are a matter of special concern.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this manuscript is to give an update on the potential statin DDIs and related adverse drug reactions (myopathy and hepatotoxicity), with special considerations on polypharmacy in elderly population, HIV patients, cardiovascular drugs and liver toxicities. The potential DDIs among statins and monoclonal antibodies including the recently approved PCSK9 inhibitors are also extensively discussed in the present review.

EXPERT OPINION

A better understanding of the incidence and clinical significance of statin DDIs will help physicians in fine-tuning the lipid-lowering therapeutic interventions thus providing their patients with an evidence-based, safe and cost-effective clinical support.

Ticagrelor-induced life-threatening bleeding via the cyclosporine-mediated drug interaction: A case report

RATIONALE

Ticagrelor has become one of the first-line antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients recommend by the guideline due to its more potent and predictable antiplatelet effect. However, bleeding is still a severe drug adverse reaction of ticagrelor therapy. We report a first case on ticagrelor-induced life-threatening bleeding via the cyclosporine-mediated drug interaction.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 58-year-old Chinese male who received cyclosporine 200 mg daily 5 years after renal transplantation. Ticagrelor was added for treating ACS. Unfortunately, gum bleeding and life-threatening bloody stool appeared 8 days later, accompanied with the sudden drop of blood pressure.

INTERVENTIONS

Ticagrelor was replaced with clopidogrel. Intravenous injection of proton pump inhibitor and agkistrodon snake venom hemocoagulase were used to stop the bleeding. Meanwhile, packed red blood cells and plasma were continuously transfused to maintain adequate blood volume.

OUTCOMES

The patient's bloody stool was well controlled after treatment.

LESSONS

The present case demonstrates that a potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) may lead to a life-threatening drug adverse reaction especially in special subjects. Therefore, regarding DDI, optimizing antiplatelet treatment should be considered for the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 receptor antagonist in this fragile population.

Severe Rhabdomyolysis due to Presumed Drug Interactions between Atorvastatin with Amlodipine and Ticagrelor

Atorvastatin and ticagrelor combination is a widely accepted therapy for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. However, rhabdomyolysis is a well-known rare side effect of statins which should be considered when treatments are combined with cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme inhibitors. We report a case of atorvastatin and ticagrelor associated severe rhabdomyolysis that progressed to multiorgan failure requiring renal replacement therapy, inotropes, intubation, and mechanical ventilation. Despite withdrawal of the precipitating cause and the supportive measures including renal replacement therapy, creatinine kinase increased due to ongoing rhabdomyolysis rapidly progressing to upper and lower limbs weakness. A muscle biopsy was performed to exclude myositis which confirmed extensive myonecrosis, consistent with statin associated rhabdomyolysis. After a prolonged ventilatory course in the intensive care unit, patient's condition improved with recovery from renal and liver dysfunction. The patient slowly regained her upper and lower limb function; she was successfully weaned off the ventilator and was discharged for rehabilitation. To our knowledge, this is a second case of statin associated rhabdomyolysis due to interaction between atorvastatin and ticagrelor. However, our case differed in that the patient was also on amlodipine, which is considered to be a weak cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor and may have further potentiated myotoxicity.

Pharmacogenetic Foundations of Therapeutic Efficacy and Adverse Events of Statins

Background: In the era of precision medicine, more attention is paid to the search for predictive markers of treatment efficacy and tolerability. Statins are one of the classes of drugs that could benefit from this approach because of their wide use and their incidence of adverse events. Methods: Literature from PubMed databases and bibliography from retrieved publications have been analyzed according to terms such as statins, pharmacogenetics, epigenetics, toxicity and drug–drug interaction, among others. The search was performed until 1 October 2016 for articles published in English language. Results: Several technical and methodological approaches have been adopted, including candidate gene and next generation sequencing (NGS) analyses, the latter being more robust and reliable. Among genes identified as possible predictive factors associated with statins toxicity, cytochrome P450 isoforms, transmembrane transporters and mitochondrial enzymes are the best characterized. Finally, the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) transporter seems to be the best target for future studies. Moreover, drug–drug interactions need to be considered for the best approach to personalized treatment. Conclusions: Pharmacogenetics of statins includes several possible genes and their polymorphisms, but muscular toxicities seem better related to SLCO1B1 variant alleles. Their analysis in the general population of patients taking statins could improve treatment adherence and efficacy; however, the cost–efficacy ratio should be carefully evaluated.

Ticagrelor: Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacogenetic Profile: An Update

Despite advancements in treatments for acute coronary syndromes over the last 10 years, they continue to be life-threatening disorders. Currently, the standard of treatment includes dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. The thienopyridine class of P2Y12 receptor antagonists, clopidogrel and prasugrel, have demonstrated efficacy. However, their use is associated with several limitations, including the need for metabolic activation and irreversible P2Y12 receptor binding causing prolonged recovery of platelet function. In addition, response to clopidogrel is variable and efficacy is reduced in patients with certain genotypes. Although prasugrel is a more consistent inhibitor of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel, it is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening and fatal bleeding. Ticagrelor is an oral antiplatelet agent of the cyclopentyltriazolopyrimidine class and also acts through the P2Y12 receptor. In contrast to clopidogrel and prasugrel, ticagrelor does not require metabolic activation and binds rapidly and reversibly to the P2Y12 receptor. In light of new data, this review provides an update on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profiles of ticagrelor in different study populations. Recent studies report that no dose adjustment for ticagrelor is required on the basis of age, gender, ethnicity, severe renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment. The non-P2Y12 actions of ticagrelor are reviewed, showing indirect positive effects on cellular adenosine concentration and biological activity, by inhibition of equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 independently of the P2Y12 receptor. CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genotypes do not appear to influence ticagrelor pharmacodynamics. A summary of drug interactions is also presented.

Simvastatin decreases steroid production in the H295R cell line and decreases steroids and FSH in female rats

Endocrine modulating effects of Simvastatin (SV) and its metabolite, Simvastatin β-hydroxy acid (SVA), were investigated in H295R cells and in female Sprague-Dawley (SPRD) rats. H295R cells were exposed to SV and SVA concentrations from 0 to 10μM for 48h. Four groups of SPRD rats received 0 (CT), 1.3 (L), 5.0 (M), and 20.0 (H)mg SV/kg bw/day for 14 days. 10 Steroids were investigated in H295R growth media, and in tissues and plasma from rats using GC-MS/MS. Plasma LH and FSH were quantified by ELISA. In the H295R assay, SV and SVA particularly decreased progestagens with IC50-values from 0.10-0.13μM for SV and from 0.019-0.055μM for SVA. In rats, SV decreased progestagens in ovaries, brain and plasma, and plasma FSH in the M (72.4% decrease) and H group (76.6% decrease). Because progestagens and gonadotropins are major players in fertility, administration of SV might exert negative effects on female reproduction.

Drug-drug interactions that interfere with statin metabolism

INTRODUCTION

Lipid-lowering drugs, especially hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), are widely used in the treatment and prevention of atherosclerotic diseases. The benefits of statins are well documented. However, myotoxic side effects, which can sometimes be severe, including myopathy or rhabdomyolysis, have been associated with the use of statins. In some cases, this toxicity is associated with pharmacokinetic alterations. Potent inhibitors of CYP 3A4 significantly increase plasma concentrations of the active forms of simvastatin, lovastatin and atorvastatin. Fluvastatin is metabolized by CYP2C9, while pravastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin are not susceptible to inhibition by any CYP.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the pharmacokinetic aspects of the drug-drug interaction with statins and genetic polymorphisms in CYPs, which are involved in the metabolism of statins, and highlights the importance of establishing a system utilizing electronic medical information practically to avoid adverse drug reactions.

EXPERT OPINION

An understanding of the mechanisms underlying statin interactions will help to minimize drug interactions and develop statins that are less prone to adverse interactions. Quantitatively analyzed information for the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering effects of statin based on electronic medical records may be useful for avoiding the adverse effect of statins.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor when treating non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

INTRODUCTION

ADP-induced platelet activation via P2Y12 receptor plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and acute coronary syndrome. The value of dual antiplatelet therapy with the addition of the thienopyridine clopidogrel to aspirin has been widely established. Prasugrel, another thienopyridine, has demonstrated more potent platelet inhibition and efficacy than clopidogrel, although this drug requires metabolic activation and is associated with increased risk of bleedings.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we discuss the role of ticagrelor in the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes treatment. We describe the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this drug and the extensive data obtained by preclinical and Phase II and III clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor, in addition to aspirin, for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes at moderate to high-risk regardless of initial therapeutic strategy. Benefit of ticagrelor, as regard mortality, may be related to off-target effects of the drug, especially those involving the metabolism of adenosine. Ticagrelor represents a cost-effective alternative in the spectrum of P2Y12 inhibitors; however, further studies are required to enable the physician to choose the most appropriate antiplatelet agent for each patient.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with clopidogrel: updated review and risk management in combination therapy

Background

Coprescribing of clopidogrel and other drugs is common. Available reviews have addressed the drug–drug interactions (DDIs) when clopidogrel is as an object drug, or focused on combination use of clopidogrel and a special class of drugs. Clinicians may still be ignorant of those DDIs when clopidogrel is a precipitant drug, the factors determining the degree of DDIs, and corresponding risk management.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to analyze the pharmacokinetic DDIs of clopidogrel and new P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors.

Results

Clopidogrel affects the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin, repaglinide, ferulic acid, sibutramine, efavirenz, and omeprazole. Low efficacy of clopidogrel is anticipated in the presence of omeprazole, esomeprazole, morphine, grapefruit juice, scutellarin, fluoxetine, azole antifungals, calcium channel blockers, sulfonylureas, and ritonavir. Augmented antiplatelet effects are anticipated when clopidogrel is coprescribed with aspirin, curcumin, cyclosporin, St John’s wort, rifampicin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The factors determining the degree of DDIs with clopidogrel include genetic status (eg, cytochrome P540 [CYP]2B6*6, CYP2C19 polymorphism, CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*1G, and CYP1A2-163C.A), species differences, and dose strength. The DDI risk does not exhibit a class effect, eg, the effects of clopidogrel on cerivastatin versus other statins, the effects of proton pump inhibitors on clopidogrel (omeprazole, esomeprazole versus pantoprazole, rabeprazole), the effects of rifampicin on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor and prasugrel, and the effects of calcium channel blockers on clopidogrel (amlodipine versus P-glycoprotein-inhibiting calcium channel blockers). The mechanism of the DDIs with clopidogrel involves modulating CYP enzymes (eg, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4), paraoxonase-1, hepatic carboxylesterase 1, P-glycoprotein, and organic anion transporter family member 1B1.

Conclusion

Effective and safe clopidogrel combination therapy can be achieved by increasing the awareness of potential changes in efficacy and toxicity, rationally selecting alternatives, tailoring drug therapy based on genotype, checking the appropriateness of physician orders, and performing therapeutic monitoring.

Ticagrelor: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety

Dual antiplatelet therapy, composed of aspirin plus a P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonist, is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A number of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonists are available for treating patients with ACS, including the thienopyridine compounds clopidogrel and prasugrel. Ticagrelor, the first of a new class of antiplatelet agents, is a noncompetitive, direct-acting P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonist. Unlike the thienopyridine compounds, ticagrelor does not require metabolism for activity. Also, whereas clopidogrel and prasugrel are irreversible inhibitors of the P2Y₁₂ receptor, ticagrelor binds reversibly to inhibit receptor signaling and subsequent platelet activation. In pharmacodynamic studies, ticagrelor demonstrated faster onset and more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. These properties of ticagrelor may contribute to reduced rates of thrombotic outcomes compared with clopidogrel, as demonstrated in a phase III clinical trial. However, in addition to bleeding, distinctive adverse effects of this new chemical entity have not been reported with the thienopyridine P2Y₁₂-receptor inhibitors. Although ticagrelor represents an advancement in P2Y₁₂-receptor inhibition therapy, a thorough understanding of this compound as an antiplatelet therapy remains to be elucidated.

How to manage prasugrel and ticagrelor in daily practice

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are next-generation antiplatelet agents that provide a rapider and more potent inhibition of platelet P2Y12 receptor than clopidogrel. In combination with aspirin, these new P2Y12 inhibitors are now the first line treatments for patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, these potent antiplatelet agents introduce a new paradigm in the daily management of antithrombotic drugs, particularly when an invasive procedure is planned. The pharmacology of these antiplatelet agents, and the results of the main clinical trials, are reviewed with a special focus on good prescription practices (indications, contra-indications, drug interactions), and on peri-operative management. Strategies are proposed for safely reducing the bleeding risk in elderly patients, in patients requiring concomitant oral anticoagulant therapy, or in patients with an increased haemorrhagic risk.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and statins: factors determining interaction strength and relevant clinical risk management

Background

Coadministration of 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs) with statins (or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitors) is common for patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. To reduce the risk of myopathy, in 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communication set a new dose limitation for simvastatin, for patients taking simvastatin concomitantly with amlodipine. However, there is no such dose limitation for atorvastatin for patients receiving amlodipine. The combination pill formulation of amlodipine/atorvastatin is available on the market. There been no systematic review of the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction (DDI) profile of DHP-CCBs with statins, the underlying mechanisms for DDIs of different degree, or the corresponding management of clinical risk.

Methods

The relevant literature was identified by performing a PubMed search, covering the period from January 1987 to September 2013. Studies in the field of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics that described DDIs between DHP-CCB and statin or that directly compared the degree of DDIs associated with cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4-metabolized statins or DHP-CCBs were included. The full text of each article was critically reviewed, and data interpretation was performed.

Results

There were three circumstances related to pharmacokinetic DDIs in the combined use of DHP-CCB and statin: 1) statin is comedicated as the precipitant drug (pravastatin–nimodipine and lovastatin–nicardipine); 2) statin is comedicated as the object drug (isradipine–lovastatin, lacidipine–simvastatin, amlodipine–simvastatin, benidipine-simvastatin, azelnidipine– simvastatin, lercanidipine–simvastatin, and amlodipine–atorvastatin); and 3) mutual interactions (lercanidipine–fluvastatin). Simvastatin has an extensive first-pass effect in the intestinal wall, whereas atorvastatin has a smaller intestinal first-pass effect. The interaction with simvastatin seems mainly driven by CYP3A4 inhibition at the intestinal level, whereas the interaction with atorvastatin is more due to hepatic CYP3A4 inhibition. The interaction of CYP3A4 inhibitor with simvastatin has been more pronounced compared with atorvastatin. From the current data, atorvastatin seems to be a safer CYP3A4-statin for comedication with DHP-CCB. There is no convincing evidence that amlodipine is an unusual DHP-CCB, either as a precipitant drug or as an object drug, from the perspective of CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism. Amlodipine may have interactions with CYP3A5 in addition to CYP3A4, which may explain its particular characteristics in comparison with other DHP-CCBs. The degree of DDIs between the DHP-CCB and statin and the clinical outcome depends on many factors, such as the kind of statin, physicochemical proprieties of the DHP-CCB, the dose of either the precipitant drug or the object drug, the sex of the patient (eg, isradipine–lovastatin), route of drug administration (eg, oral versus intravenous nicardipine–lovastatin), the administration schedule (eg, nonconcurrent dosing method versus concurrent dosing method), and the pharmacogenetic status (eg, CYP3A5-nonexpressers versus CYP3A5-expressers).

Conclusion

Clinical professionals should enhance risk management regarding the combination use of two classes of drugs by increasing their awareness of the potential changes in therapeutic efficacy and adverse drug reactions, by rationally prescribing alternatives, by paying attention to dose adjustment and the administration schedule, and by review of the appropriateness of physician orders. Further study is needed – the DDIs between DHP-CCBs and statins have not all been studied in humans, from either a pharmacokinetic or a clinical perspective; also, the strength of the different pharmacokinetic interactions of DHP-CCBs with statins should be addressed by systematic investigations.

The effect of ticagrelor on the metabolism of midazolam in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

In vitro studies have demonstrated that ticagrelor, an oral antiplatelet agent, is a substrate, activator, and inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Thus, potential CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interactions may occur.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this article was to report study results on the effect of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam (oral midazolam study) and oral versus intravenous (IV) midazolam (oral/IV midazolam study). Secondary objectives included assessing the effect of midazolam on ticagrelor pharmacokinetic parameters, and the safety and tolerability of ticagrelor/midazolam coadministration.

METHODS

Two randomized crossover studies were conducted in healthy volunteers (n = 28 in each) with ticagrelor and midazolam. In the first study, volunteers received oral ticagrelor (400 mg daily) or placebo for 6 days, then oral midazolam (7.5 mg). The second study regimen was a single dose of ticagrelor 270 mg, then ticagrelor 180 mg BID for 6 days with a single oral (7.5 mg) or IV (2.5 mg) dose of midazolam.

RESULTS

After oral midazolam administration, ticagrelor significantly reduced the AUC(0-∞) of midazolam (30%-32%) and 4-hydroxymidazolam (42%-47%) but not 1-hydroxymidazolam. After administration of IV midazolam, ticagrelor reduced the AUC(0-∞) of midazolam (12%) and 4-hydroxymidazolam (23%) but not 1-hydroxymidazolam.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ticagrelor can weakly activate the metabolism of midazolam to its major 1'-hydroxy metabolite, and at the same time, seems to weakly inhibit midazolam 4'-hydroxylation. Furthermore, ticagrelor affects both hepatic and intestinal CYP3A activity.

Effect of ticagrelor on pulmonary function in healthy elderly volunteers and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is a direct-acting, reversibly binding, oral P2Y12 platelet inhibitor that reduces thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Dyspnea is one of the most commonly reported adverse events associated with ticagrelor.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of ticagrelor on pulmonary function in healthy elderly volunteers and asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

METHODS

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover, single-center studies were conducted: 1) healthy elderly volunteers (55-75 years; n = 12); 2) patients with mild asthma (n = 11) or mild-to-moderate COPD (n = 7). Subjects were randomized to receive ticagrelor (a single 450 mg dose, 180 mg 12 hours later, twice daily for 2 days, and once on day 4) or placebo, with a 7 day washout. Pulmonary function at rest and during exercise was monitored using similar schedules and assessments across the two studies.

RESULTS

Resting pulmonary function parameters, including respiratory rate, minute ventilation, or tidal volume, were similar between ticagrelor and placebo in any cohort. Furthermore, bronchospasm (as determined by spirometry and pulse oximetry), was not observed with either ticagrelor or placebo in any cohort. Perception of breathing was generally similar following ticagrelor or placebo. Exercise performance was not affected, and no clinically relevant differences were seen in pulmonary parameters during exercise for ticagrelor or placebo. There was no apparent relationship between plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its main metabolite and pulmonary function. Ticagrelor was well tolerated in all cohorts. Study limitations include the use of relatively few subjects without documented coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term administration of high doses of ticagrelor did not appear to alter pulmonary function at rest and during exercise in subjects at risk of (healthy elderly) or with respiratory impairment (mild asthma or mild-to-moderate COPD).

Effect of the CYP3A inhibitors, diltiazem and ketoconazole, on ticagrelor pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

Two open-label, two-period, crossover studies in healthy volunteers were designed to determine the pharmacokinetic interactions between ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, and a moderate (diltiazem) and a strong (ketoconazole) cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor.

METHODS

Seventeen volunteers received diltiazem (240 mg once daily) for 14 days. In the second study, ketoconazole (n = 14) 200 mg twice daily was given for 10 days. A single oral 90-mg ticagrelor dose was administered on day 8 (diltiazem) or day 4 (ketoconazole). In each study, volunteers received a single 90-mg oral dose of ticagrelor before or after washout (≥14 days). Pharmacokinetic parameters for ticagrelor, AR-C124910XX (primary metabolite), diltiazem, and ketoconazole were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with ticagrelor alone, diltiazem co-administration significantly increased the mean maximum concentration (C max) and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for ticagrelor by 69% and 174%, respectively. Diltiazem co-administration reduced C max by 38% but had no significant effect on AUC for AR-C124910XX. C max and AUC for ticagrelor were increased by 135% and 632%, respectively, by ketoconazole co-administration, whereas these parameters were reduced by 89% and 56%, respectively, for AR-C124910XX. Diltiazem and ketoconazole pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly affected by the presence of ticagrelor.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ticagrelor can be co-administered with moderate CYP3A inhibitors. However, co-administration of strong CYP3A inhibitors with ticagrelor is not recommended.